The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism.Hence it follows that,just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism,so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity,Rabbi Harry Waton,p.143-144)
We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
(The Jew,December 1925,Zinobit)
This book detail their plan for America,it is free on internet.
People like this guy are the reason we need a third party. I bet the only reason he was voted in was because the new yorkers didn't want to vote for a republican.
it5: In the 90's there were many who were greatly suspicious of expanded federal dominance and heavy-handed behavior. At the time, dems (and Schumer) were probably in favor of a strong central gov't and suspicious of "militias." Now, years later, I suspect many of those same Dems would be suspicious of a strong Bush gov't, seeing it as overly authoritarian, too threatening under the patriot act. I'm not sure "liberals" are your natural enemy on this, given their concerns for civil rights.
it5: A gov't official's stand on gun ownership doesn't mean he is a lying treasonous person. The point is, you can't win if you keep on impugning the guy's honor. There are many people who believe we would be better off if we confiscated every gun in the country. Schumer is not the devil, he's just a politician with a constituency.
it5: Again, you would need to explain "your lifestyle" for me to make sense of your remarks. Many people were outraged by the Weaver and Waco affairs, and many people who are utterly non-violent support gun ownership. Many people (I'm one) believe that enforcing an environmental regulation may involve appropriate payment to a land-owner. But Schumer was not responsible for the Weaver thing, he came into the picture after it happened.
it5: It doesn't surprise me that you are threatening illegal vigilante behavior and violence. You will, I suppose, do almost anything to avoid actually dealing with the issue, which is Gonzalez's record and what he has done to incur so much opposition to him.
it5: No, he's not. He's a U.S. Senator with an excellent record. Maybe you don't like some of the things he's done, but saying he's a whore and an idiot simply means you have no real argument.
it5l: If you believe it was a good idea to cause confusion about prisoner/detainee treatment, 1) I think you're a very small minority, and 2) you and I have got nothing more to discuss. Maybe I misread your comment, tho'. .
it5: Maybe, but then that is a hearing for whenever it happens. This one is probably about more than the U.S. atty's -- Gonzales was all too eager to muck up the rules for treatment of prisoners or detainees, saying the Geneva Accords were "quaint." I believe he is despised by many, who see those recommendations as horrible mistakes that have left our reputation in the world besmirched.
dan: Tut the point of hearings is to see what is going on, regardless of the technical legality of the firings. Both Repubs and Dems want to know what was going on there, either way.
Now go away, I got better things to do than talk with someone who so thoroughly disrespects others who give him the time of day (when obviously nobody else in your real life will) by name-calling.
I'm giving you far more attention and respect than you, who has yet to demonstrate that you have any respect for anyone (much less the law), warrant. Whatever "family" you do or don't have in law enforcement, that's them, not you. You couldn't produce ONE cop, EVER, to defend Weaver's or Koresh's blowing off a court summons. It is to laugh.
If anything, if you believe you were 'entrapped,' wouldn't that tell you that they're less likely to turn around and go home, that they're just itching to nail your ass for the flimsiest reason?
Try $100 thousand; the daughters (2) got $1 million apiece. The feds could have planted a thermonuclear weapon under Weaver's bed and phonied a page of him trying to sell it on Craig's List - Jumping bond, hole'ing up on an Idaho mountain with guns isn't going to get the court or the feds to turn their backs and forget about you.
What part of "YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR IN COURT....." don't you understand? Distrusting the govt doesn't give you a license to blow off the court! It's in court that Weaver would have had his opportunity if/when the govt couldn't make its case. Randy Weaver was ultimately found guilty, and went to prison! For blowing off the court!
Now, you can go ahead and be a total asswipe, rail about the feds and police brutality all you want, but if your own house isn't in order, if you've shown contempt for the law, you can be as righteously indignant as you want, but nobody is going to come to your rescue and take up your cause.
Weaver didn't "win" his lawsuit - the govt settled. Weaver was still found guilty by a jury ultimately and went to prison.
The same goes for Koresh and Waco.
The rule of law is real basic. If you think you've been wrongfully charged, you'll have your day in court. Had Randy Weaver just appeared in court when he promised to appear, his wife, son and dog would be alive today.
When you've been arraigned on weapons charges by the federal govt, are out on bail, fail to appear in federal court (deciding instead to "not have any more dealings with the courts of the federal govt"), hole up armed on remote mountain property, and expect it'll all go away (the feds, the charges) as if by magic, WHAT COLOR IS THE SKY ON YOUR PLANET?
Take a look at this letter (sent to Leahy and Conyers from DOJ employees) about what Bush & Rove have been up to in planning for a 1000 years of Reichpublican rule. YouTube doesn't allow url links so Google: "DOJ" "mcnulty" "ellston" "harvard" "yale" "anonymous". Chase down the .pdf that tpmuckraker uploaded.
Take a look at this letter (Google sent to Leahy and Conyers from DOJ employees) about what Bush & Rove have been up to in planning for a 1000 years of Reichpublican rule. YouTube doesn't allow url links so Google "DOJ" "mcnulty" "ellston" "harvard" "yale" "anonymous" and chase it down - tpm has uploaded a .pdf of the letter.
What's next? Are you going to defend Koresh at Waco, too? When law enforcement shows up at your door and says "Come out with your hands up" and they're met with "You ain't taking me alive, Copper!", what do you think is going to happen? The shootout at Ruby Ridge, while unfortunate & badly handled, with Randy Weaver, a white separatist nut job with weapons violations & charges up the wazoo, was an outcome any sane person could have predicted.
What's your source on that? If Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all of the border cases, and BushCo wasn't forthcoming in providing more, what could the possible reasons for lowered prosecution rates be? We already know that she and other US Attys had to lower the guidelines & raise the violation requirements without so much as a peep out of BushCo. What's your answer? Tick tock, lt4lee, thousands of lives are at stake.
You speak talking points without telling the whole story. Feinstein & Issa complained, first step, which led to identifying the problem. Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all the border cases. After not getting more help from Gonzales & Bush, Lam met with Issa & Sensenbrenner, chair of House Judiciary Committee and told them "Often it came down to prosecuting alien smugglers vs criminals who come to this country with previous arrests for rape and child molestation."
When Repubs go to war, at home or abroad, a lot of innocent people become collateral damage. Google "Steven Biskupic" "Georgia Thompson" and "Capital Times" for another example of this US Atty scandal.
You speak talking points without telling the whole story. Feinstein & Issa complained, first step, which led to identifying the problem. Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all the border cases. After not getting more help from Gonzales & Bush, Lam met with Issa & Sensenbrenner, chair of House Judiciary Committee and told them "Often it came down to prosecuting alien smugglers vs criminals who come to this country with previous arrests for rape and child molestation."
Not according to the evidence, as read into the record during Dianne Feinstein's round of questioning. Lam's record was exemplary, highest accolades, letters of commendation.
Not exactly. You don't fire US attys mid-term. We have a POTUS using the DOJ, which is supposed to be an independent agency, for partisan political dirty tricks. To bring false charges against Dems before elections and after the Dem loses, drop the charges. Rove did the same thing in TX. Congress has barely scratched the surface of what Bush has been doing. Keep watching.
Since no one in the Department of Justice can explain how some of the names got on the list of U.S. Attorneys to be fired, one can only conclude that this must have been a White House- orchestrated operation. In the Bush White House, 417 people speak with 30 different people in the Justice Department. Under Clinton, only four people in the White House spoke with three people in the Justice Department
Who gives a shit if they were fired. They serve at the pleasure of the president, period. If he wants to dismiss them, then so be it, this whole thing is a joke.
No, you are wrong. U.S. Attorneys are appointed by the President. Like most Presidential appointments they serve - in the vernacular of the Federal government - at the pleasure of the President.
Not exactly. The DOJ, while within the Executive Branch, is supposed to be independent of politics and the POTUS. Our system of justice, our democracy, depends on it. Once appointed, unless there is cause (and it doesn't look like there has been), if they're fired mid-term like this, it's because they refused to bend to partisan politics. No other POTUS has ever done this.
Yes, and so what? The practice is and always has been with good reason, if a POTUS wants to remove a US Atty midterm, it should be for cause. Because US attys, like judges, must be free to apply the law without political pressure. The DOJ is to be above partisan politics.
Yes, just as the president is subject to removal of his office by the United States Congress. However, you don't see the impeachment of a president merely because Congress disagrees with the president. This is a good conversation... nice to see things are staying civil.
It appears that Gonzales is a puppet, a figurehead. Bush & Rove have been using DOJ to secure Republican control of govt thru dirty tricks. Rove did this in TX, same thing. Having the govt bring false charges against Dems before elections in order to spin campaign ads, then after elections and the Dem loses, the charges are dropped because there was never anything to them.
dan: For any reason? They obviously cannot be fired because they're too interested in prosecuting some sort of case against a Republican, right? I mean, they _do_ work for us, the people, right?
the federal prosecutors can be fired for any freakin reason. if i worked for schumer and if he wanted me gone would he go to the rest of congress to ask permission?
To bad they dont act on it... Its a show... They are not doing anything ...People see them being drilled a LITTLE bit and think its being taken care of... Its not... YouTube is probably the way that most people get to even see this stuff...
This has been flagged as spam show
The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism.Hence it follows that,just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism,so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity,Rabbi Harry Waton,p.143-144)
We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
(The Jew,December 1925,Zinobit)
This book detail their plan for America,it is free on internet.
Who Is Esau-Edom.
MsMihailescu 1 year ago 2
People like this guy are the reason we need a third party. I bet the only reason he was voted in was because the new yorkers didn't want to vote for a republican.
aimsux3214 3 years ago
it5: In the 90's there were many who were greatly suspicious of expanded federal dominance and heavy-handed behavior. At the time, dems (and Schumer) were probably in favor of a strong central gov't and suspicious of "militias." Now, years later, I suspect many of those same Dems would be suspicious of a strong Bush gov't, seeing it as overly authoritarian, too threatening under the patriot act. I'm not sure "liberals" are your natural enemy on this, given their concerns for civil rights.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5: A gov't official's stand on gun ownership doesn't mean he is a lying treasonous person. The point is, you can't win if you keep on impugning the guy's honor. There are many people who believe we would be better off if we confiscated every gun in the country. Schumer is not the devil, he's just a politician with a constituency.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5: Again, you would need to explain "your lifestyle" for me to make sense of your remarks. Many people were outraged by the Weaver and Waco affairs, and many people who are utterly non-violent support gun ownership. Many people (I'm one) believe that enforcing an environmental regulation may involve appropriate payment to a land-owner. But Schumer was not responsible for the Weaver thing, he came into the picture after it happened.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5: It doesn't surprise me that you are threatening illegal vigilante behavior and violence. You will, I suppose, do almost anything to avoid actually dealing with the issue, which is Gonzalez's record and what he has done to incur so much opposition to him.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5: No, he's not. He's a U.S. Senator with an excellent record. Maybe you don't like some of the things he's done, but saying he's a whore and an idiot simply means you have no real argument.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5l: If you believe it was a good idea to cause confusion about prisoner/detainee treatment, 1) I think you're a very small minority, and 2) you and I have got nothing more to discuss. Maybe I misread your comment, tho'. .
nicholas9999 4 years ago
it5: Maybe, but then that is a hearing for whenever it happens. This one is probably about more than the U.S. atty's -- Gonzales was all too eager to muck up the rules for treatment of prisoners or detainees, saying the Geneva Accords were "quaint." I believe he is despised by many, who see those recommendations as horrible mistakes that have left our reputation in the world besmirched.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
dan: Tut the point of hearings is to see what is going on, regardless of the technical legality of the firings. Both Repubs and Dems want to know what was going on there, either way.
nicholas9999 4 years ago
SO much fun watching the elite talking heads fight for power to enslave us.
braincandy30 4 years ago
Now go away, I got better things to do than talk with someone who so thoroughly disrespects others who give him the time of day (when obviously nobody else in your real life will) by name-calling.
millonfloss 4 years ago
I'm giving you far more attention and respect than you, who has yet to demonstrate that you have any respect for anyone (much less the law), warrant. Whatever "family" you do or don't have in law enforcement, that's them, not you. You couldn't produce ONE cop, EVER, to defend Weaver's or Koresh's blowing off a court summons. It is to laugh.
millonfloss 4 years ago
If anything, if you believe you were 'entrapped,' wouldn't that tell you that they're less likely to turn around and go home, that they're just itching to nail your ass for the flimsiest reason?
millonfloss 4 years ago
Try $100 thousand; the daughters (2) got $1 million apiece. The feds could have planted a thermonuclear weapon under Weaver's bed and phonied a page of him trying to sell it on Craig's List - Jumping bond, hole'ing up on an Idaho mountain with guns isn't going to get the court or the feds to turn their backs and forget about you.
millonfloss 4 years ago
What part of "YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR IN COURT....." don't you understand? Distrusting the govt doesn't give you a license to blow off the court! It's in court that Weaver would have had his opportunity if/when the govt couldn't make its case. Randy Weaver was ultimately found guilty, and went to prison! For blowing off the court!
millonfloss 4 years ago
Now, you can go ahead and be a total asswipe, rail about the feds and police brutality all you want, but if your own house isn't in order, if you've shown contempt for the law, you can be as righteously indignant as you want, but nobody is going to come to your rescue and take up your cause.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Weaver didn't "win" his lawsuit - the govt settled. Weaver was still found guilty by a jury ultimately and went to prison.
The same goes for Koresh and Waco.
The rule of law is real basic. If you think you've been wrongfully charged, you'll have your day in court. Had Randy Weaver just appeared in court when he promised to appear, his wife, son and dog would be alive today.
millonfloss 4 years ago
When you've been arraigned on weapons charges by the federal govt, are out on bail, fail to appear in federal court (deciding instead to "not have any more dealings with the courts of the federal govt"), hole up armed on remote mountain property, and expect it'll all go away (the feds, the charges) as if by magic, WHAT COLOR IS THE SKY ON YOUR PLANET?
millonfloss 4 years ago
Take a look at this letter (sent to Leahy and Conyers from DOJ employees) about what Bush & Rove have been up to in planning for a 1000 years of Reichpublican rule. YouTube doesn't allow url links so Google: "DOJ" "mcnulty" "ellston" "harvard" "yale" "anonymous". Chase down the .pdf that tpmuckraker uploaded.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Take a look at this letter (Google sent to Leahy and Conyers from DOJ employees) about what Bush & Rove have been up to in planning for a 1000 years of Reichpublican rule. YouTube doesn't allow url links so Google "DOJ" "mcnulty" "ellston" "harvard" "yale" "anonymous" and chase it down - tpm has uploaded a .pdf of the letter.
millonfloss 4 years ago
What's next? Are you going to defend Koresh at Waco, too? When law enforcement shows up at your door and says "Come out with your hands up" and they're met with "You ain't taking me alive, Copper!", what do you think is going to happen? The shootout at Ruby Ridge, while unfortunate & badly handled, with Randy Weaver, a white separatist nut job with weapons violations & charges up the wazoo, was an outcome any sane person could have predicted.
millonfloss 4 years ago
What's your source on that? If Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all of the border cases, and BushCo wasn't forthcoming in providing more, what could the possible reasons for lowered prosecution rates be? We already know that she and other US Attys had to lower the guidelines & raise the violation requirements without so much as a peep out of BushCo. What's your answer? Tick tock, lt4lee, thousands of lives are at stake.
millonfloss 4 years ago
You speak talking points without telling the whole story. Feinstein & Issa complained, first step, which led to identifying the problem. Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all the border cases. After not getting more help from Gonzales & Bush, Lam met with Issa & Sensenbrenner, chair of House Judiciary Committee and told them "Often it came down to prosecuting alien smugglers vs criminals who come to this country with previous arrests for rape and child molestation."
millonfloss 4 years ago
When Repubs go to war, at home or abroad, a lot of innocent people become collateral damage. Google "Steven Biskupic" "Georgia Thompson" and "Capital Times" for another example of this US Atty scandal.
millonfloss 4 years ago
You speak talking points without telling the whole story. Feinstein & Issa complained, first step, which led to identifying the problem. Lam didn't have enough asst prosecutors to try all the border cases. After not getting more help from Gonzales & Bush, Lam met with Issa & Sensenbrenner, chair of House Judiciary Committee and told them "Often it came down to prosecuting alien smugglers vs criminals who come to this country with previous arrests for rape and child molestation."
millonfloss 4 years ago
Not according to the evidence, as read into the record during Dianne Feinstein's round of questioning. Lam's record was exemplary, highest accolades, letters of commendation.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Not exactly. You don't fire US attys mid-term. We have a POTUS using the DOJ, which is supposed to be an independent agency, for partisan political dirty tricks. To bring false charges against Dems before elections and after the Dem loses, drop the charges. Rove did the same thing in TX. Congress has barely scratched the surface of what Bush has been doing. Keep watching.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Since no one in the Department of Justice can explain how some of the names got on the list of U.S. Attorneys to be fired, one can only conclude that this must have been a White House- orchestrated operation. In the Bush White House, 417 people speak with 30 different people in the Justice Department. Under Clinton, only four people in the White House spoke with three people in the Justice Department
getplaning 4 years ago
Who gives a shit if they were fired. They serve at the pleasure of the president, period. If he wants to dismiss them, then so be it, this whole thing is a joke.
Manos723 4 years ago
Wrong. They serve at the pleasure of justice and the laws governing the U.S.
portera25 4 years ago
No, you are wrong. U.S. Attorneys are appointed by the President. Like most Presidential appointments they serve - in the vernacular of the Federal government - at the pleasure of the President.
Manos723 4 years ago
Not exactly. The DOJ, while within the Executive Branch, is supposed to be independent of politics and the POTUS. Our system of justice, our democracy, depends on it. Once appointed, unless there is cause (and it doesn't look like there has been), if they're fired mid-term like this, it's because they refused to bend to partisan politics. No other POTUS has ever done this.
millonfloss 4 years ago
The Los Angeles Times' "Primer on US Attorneys" quotes the US Code as saying: "Each United States attorney is subject to removal by the President."
Manos723 4 years ago
Yes, and so what? The practice is and always has been with good reason, if a POTUS wants to remove a US Atty midterm, it should be for cause. Because US attys, like judges, must be free to apply the law without political pressure. The DOJ is to be above partisan politics.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Yes, just as the president is subject to removal of his office by the United States Congress. However, you don't see the impeachment of a president merely because Congress disagrees with the president. This is a good conversation... nice to see things are staying civil.
portera25 4 years ago
It appears that Gonzales is a puppet, a figurehead. Bush & Rove have been using DOJ to secure Republican control of govt thru dirty tricks. Rove did this in TX, same thing. Having the govt bring false charges against Dems before elections in order to spin campaign ads, then after elections and the Dem loses, the charges are dropped because there was never anything to them.
millonfloss 4 years ago
Gonzales is another bufoon from Texas just like Dumbya, the liar. This joke Alberto doesn't even lie well...LOL
bobinmass 4 years ago
dan: For any reason? They obviously cannot be fired because they're too interested in prosecuting some sort of case against a Republican, right? I mean, they _do_ work for us, the people, right?
nicholas9999 4 years ago
LIAR! Put the bastard in jail for multiple counts of perjury
Bretttido 4 years ago
the federal prosecutors can be fired for any freakin reason. if i worked for schumer and if he wanted me gone would he go to the rest of congress to ask permission?
ordellrobbie 4 years ago
that might be true but they lied about reasons for firing them. clinton was impeached for lying, remember?
buzz851 4 years ago
It is against the law to fire anyone for no reason at all.
portera25 4 years ago
God, he really has no clue what to say does he? So what, he just makes up shit on the fly? Fucking LIAR!
Breakdown1010101 4 years ago
To bad they dont act on it... Its a show... They are not doing anything ...People see them being drilled a LITTLE bit and think its being taken care of... Its not... YouTube is probably the way that most people get to even see this stuff...
compman67 4 years ago
Oversight and accountability is what keeps this country honest.
stewart0312 4 years ago
Liar, liar, pants on fire.......
geyser 4 years ago
Thank you TPMTV!
im4mary 4 years ago
Amen!
BuelahMan 4 years ago
Thanks to TPM for putting these videos up for those that can not watch the hearings live.
dusty1215 4 years ago