I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
@reallydisturbing ...... watch the opening credits of Star Trek which aired BEFORE Apollo -- Rodenberry did a superior job. He could actually put the stars in the back ground.... and music and credits. Kubrick did a suprior job. NASA couldn't even make the moon ball look better than a science fair project by a 3rd grader who rides the short bus. NASA NAZI = FAKE =FAIL
@jerichomutant For the stars, same with your eyes or photography, you need long and high exposure (long stills) to see them, and since the moon doesn't have atmosphere the sun hits x times stronger on its surface, making it even harder to see them, the exposure of the cameras were designed so we could see the astronaut and details of the lunar surface, not the stars (since we can see them back home anyway).
Arguing this is pointless. If you were to take these conspiracy tards to the moon, drag them up to the landing sites and shove their faces in the bootprints, they would STILL say it was all faked. Funny how the conspiracy kooks always think that THEY are REALLY the smart ones that cannot be fooled. I've not met one yet that has more than a rudimentary education, poor dental hygiene, and a chronic lack of female companionship.
If we went then.....and with technology so much more advanced y havent we gone back....they go back to other planets.... But not the moon? makes sense huh? they dont go cuz they know wen they do...we will finally see they lied ......cuz things they say are there arent an were never there
For sumone to say this happened they must have been drunk.....look at all the proof that it is fake ....and ur gunna talk about stars.you see more stars when get higher in elevation... An seriously...they went there to put a mirror there....haha surrrre.....they spent all that money time an people....to go there one time an JUST put a mirror their?
im actually so tired of all these fags who are going on about how the apollo 11 moon landing was faked. it clearly happened. there are pictures of the landing site, explanations about the flag waving, and all that crap about the bent shadows. more evidence supporting that it happened than all these lame conspiracy theories
@iKingMeow there are reasonable explanations for both of those things.
1. if the cameras were designed to pick up the faint glow of the stars they would clearly over-expose the bright/reflective surface of the moon, and all u would see would be a glow
2. When the "shuttle" lifted off there were no burn marks, that is correct. to answer why that was the case u gotta learn about why burn marks are made and why they wouldnt be made in that environment. utube doesnt give me enough sapce to explain.
lets see if it was faked i like to kno how they got all that equipment up there like the rover and laser mirror and all the rest of the junk they left there how do you explain the rover tracks huum remote control may be.
Its real... its so real. Allow yourselves the pleasure of knowing the human race actually did this. The bullshit of politics and greed happened later on, but we did this. The world used to be very cool once upon a time. I know thats hard for youngsters to get their heads around. But before many of you were born, this happened. Just because you cant relate to it doesnt mean it didnt happen. Look at Phil Plait's website to get a good scientific explanation of how something this awesome is real.
To all of those people claiming this was fake because there are no stars... Because the moon has no atmosphere, there is nothing to scatter sunlight. Because of this, the light there is extremely bright, and any normal picture would have just been a whitewash. The cameras had light filters to block the majority of that light in order to actually be able to see the landscape Because starlight is so dim in comparison, any light they cast was filtered out in the process.
Please tell me how the mirrors got on the surface of them moon, precisely placed, so that we can still today bounce lasers off of them with predictable results? There are mirrors there for a reason, at the landing sites.
@Those who say the missions were faked: Grow up, and stop believing such damaging lies. You only harm yourself, and worse, your children! Because they trust you to give accurate information. How dare you hurt them and their abilities to prosper!! Be intelligent, not "right"!
Let's Go Back then. This time with a Larger Spaceship that will remain in Earth Orbit after returning from the Moon. It can dock with the ISS and be used again.
The same spaceship can be resupplied and used for the Mars Mission.
fuck lxfx u dont need shit here on earth to see the fucking stars u can clearly see them with your eyes any fucking cam should of been able to pick up some bright ass stars that was fake usa aint do shit they never made it there u dumb ass
you can't take a photo of two things with such different degrees of brightness. The used negativefilms got a limitid range of contrast. Take a look at photos of the Shuttle-missions with astronauts doing an EVA. There are no stars.
think about it her on earth we clearly see the stars at night bright stars far away but they ass on the damn moon u dont see not one stay man never been to the moon its bs think about it
@youngwyte5 You idiot. It is extremely difficult to shoot stars in the blackness of night here on earth, using a modern digital camera. Imagine doing it using one from the '60s and on a Sun lit Moon. It would have been impossible to capture them.
i cant believe that little pod has 1/3rd the thrust of an equivalent earth rocket, a 300ton rocket sends 3920 kg to heights 250 km from earth, now a third of that mass in pure thruster rocket... 100,000kg would deliver an equivalent height on the moon., lets say a third of the height is required for lunar orbit, so 30,000kg of thruster, yet the module weighed less than 5000kg....
@Submariner75 that post didnt make sense to be fair. turns out that the rockets arent the problem with the lunar mission, but the evidences surrounding the landing,
im sure you've seen the pics with dust all around the lunar module, yet, in the landing footage, at 120ft? you can see the dust being blown across the surface, infact buzz also says so!, it looks like fast streeks of dust moving out of view from beneath the rocket across the surface. one of the many...
@Submariner75 well, i say the rockets worked, according to the data presented wrt thrust, as for build, well, who knows.
the evidence in the mythbusters episode invalidate the flag (im not talking about the hypothesis), the pendulum footage - when sped up (though not by the larger factors posted), you can actually tell that the astronauts are struggling to move/open the crate, as you would expect (1/6th gravity - 6 x force can be applied by muscles, suit weight ~ W of man on earth.) etc etc.
There were many problems with the N1 rocket though. It was a brilliant design, but clustering engines turned out to be a big drawback. They were only providing v2 thrust (i believe the specs mentioned either v2 or slightly higher) levels. Yet the added weight also had induced problems. That has been the main drawback of russian rockets for years.
You say it is fake and call people retards. But when there is no evidence (Which is undebunkable I might add) to support your claim, then how is one to believe you? Especially when it has been proven to be done (Heck LCROSS photos alone confirm it) Learn some physics before making outrageous claims.
its true, i could beleive that nasa could fool laypeople, but the soviets had the technology to monitor the moon landings, they found nothing amiss. they even put a story about the moon landings in pravda. but all these theorists, working out of their basements know better i suppose.
would you trust anybody who says the "van allen belt" is safe for humans to be in. according to science, thats not possible without inches thick lead shielding... NASA contradicts itself everywhere, as shown very clearly (scientifically) here... search for "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly"
MoonFaker has it wrong, I suggest you do your own research, without someone telling you what they think the answer is.
With some digging at The Health Physics Society I found that the majority of (the low energies below 10 MeV) alpha and beta particles in the VAB would be stopped by 2 CM of aluminum. The astronauts were in fact exposed, but it was only about 2 rem during the most intense part of the VAB, and they were only in the belts for an hour at most.
@ptraiders40 • those "astrophysicists, astronomers, aerospace engineers from all countries" aren't too credible because they have yet to figure out how to get their own countries to the moon. you know why? because its not possible yet!
• NASA has contradicted themselves many times about various details. and ADMITTED to fabricating the apollo 11 videos- claiming they'd gotten "erased".
• as for "lunar samples" how can anyone verify the authenticity, with nothing to compare them to?????
@jusTOOfresh So you're saying that 400,00 people who worked on the program, every responsible scientist, journalist, and world leader, were fooled for decades but a handful of dopes on the internet have the truth? Don't you think that's kind of a stretch? You think after each President takes the oath that they just let him in on all these secrets and he just agrees to go along with the joke? I bet its fun to yank your chain on a lot of things. Just stay in the cave.
@mduncan36 no that's not what I'm saying. But I am saying that you've been fooled. lol. Continue believing everything the Americam governement tells you, they have no reason to lie to gullible American's like yourself. I'm quite sure that there were not 400,000 people privy to the classified inner workings of the Apollo program. And some NASA employees have expressed skepticism regarding certain situations not limited the Apollo missions. Ignorance is bliss isn't it? Good day, sir
@jusTOOfresh A Japanese space probe took pictures of the moon and found the remains of the Apollo missions on the surface, in Lehman's terms it proved that we walked on the Moon.
@growinoutdafrofro you can save the lehman's terms, but please be more specific. If you're referring to the "Kayuga" lunar probe photos I disagree. The photos are not clear enough to accurately discern any "remains" from the Apollo missions. There isn't even a picture of the flag. Those pictures are insubstancial and don't prove a thing.
@jusTOOfresh A Japanese space probe took pictures of the moon and found the remains of the Apollo missions on the surface, in Lehman's terms it proved that we walked on the Moon.
ive done my 9/11 homework. the info is all over the net. after intense comparison with omitted witness statements from the gov. report, ... i know 9/11 was an inside job. it is just as impossible, that we landed humans on the moon in 1969. all NASA's explanations to the countless flaws in the apollo mission, have the same character of total denial as the 9/11 gov. report ... its the same BS all the way.
@OkiGuy23 yea rewrite history, the man said swear you went to the moon and the austronaut cound not swear to it. so go ahead rewrite history. were all so proud of your type. i have a better one you swear on a holy bible we went to the moon.
@OkiGuy23 If someone asked me to swear on something, or insisted I prove something to them, Id be the bigger man and not accommodate them either. Anyone that disrespectful deserves to be ignored.
@ReallyDisturbing It can be faked now adays easy, especialy with a billion dollar budget that nasa had, but realy lets not contest what they say until we go to the moon and its there or not there. The Lazer thing isnt proof at all, we need to see the lunar landers there. Im just so surprised that we havent gone back and thats what leaves me questioning!
@devinseven11 If you google for LROC, you can see the pictures that the Orbiter has taken of the landing sites. It's also found the old Soviet Lunar rovers, and the Surveyor landing sites. There are a few reasons we haven't been back. a) it's incredibly expensive, b) we've been already and c) unmanned exploration is both cheaper and safer.
I dont know if Appolo 11 set up any comunication disc but Appolo 12 did and that made talking back and forth so fast that it was like a normal conversation
People who still insist on propagating the hoax theories are ignorant, deluded, insecure or all three. There's a plethora of evidence, both physical and anecdotal, that proves they did go and yet these sad individuals desperately cling to a few perceived anomalies they hold up as "proof" the landings were fake. It's time to find another security blanket losers.
NASA are such goofballs, the co-called restored footage is SOFTER not sharper. Yes, it's free of specs and such, and a little brighter, but it's just another attempt to fool the world.
Some people may believe it was a hoax may be due to the efforts of a small number of people who make a living by selling books and videos 'exposing the hoax'. The trouble these people run into is that because it was not a hoax, they have to work very hard to make it seem, however tenuously, that it was. The consequence of this is that the claims they make are both idiotic and farcical in their desperate attempts to get you to part with your cash.
Yes I understand the average distance between Earth and Moon is about 239,000 miles.
A radio signals travels at the speed of light which is 186,200 miles per second.
So the time delay is 1.28 seconds each way or 2.567 seconds altogether, that's assuming there's no delay in the transmitting equipment and the other person replies the split second the fist person releases the mike.
You all thought, oh, Bobbbbbable is just a stupid loser, some dumbshit troll, he/she'll go away, don't worry about it. The attack is over. WRONG!! Bobbbbbable the hotheaded hateful troll is still here, this video aint safe. Watch out youtube, here we come.
yup, and in 100 years, still not a soul will be able to go the the moon because dammit unless u r behind 1 metre of solid iron/lead you brain getsirradiated to the core
And to all the geniuses that insist, "you talking about not silencing people, bobbbbbable, you just silenced us all by putting up all that spam and pushing our comments back so many minipages". But that's precisely the reason why I did that, because I want everyone to feel how it's like to have your opinions all silenced and put to the back. I did it in response to your actions.
To all the Einsteins who point out, "but you don't have a website!", of course not, I just put that up to see if people are going to be willing to mark all those comments as spam!! Cuz if you do, yull have a whole mini-page of them.
Just for all the fuckers out there, Bobbbbbable is not a stupid conspiracy believer, she/he doesn't really think it was faked or anything. I just said that because I'm tired of seeing anyone who does voice a dissenting opinion here being shunned out to a minus 6.
That comment I just posted about six times, read it backwards. Each word is forward, just the sentences are reversed. That's the minus six invisible comment that I put up right after my fakeness rant!!
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
In fact, everyone's in a trap right now. Either leave my comments alone and don't rate them down, or have a whole "view all" page with invisible comments, quite unsightly!! HA HA, who's the man now dog? ME, Bobbbbbable.
Fuck the Associated Press, yur video just got fucked up good. >:-)
I just put a whole bunch of comments up that say it's a fake!! So many, click view all and the whole first page is covered with them. That's way too many for people to be marking them down!!! HA HA
Ha ha, everybody loses except me. All the fucking comments on this goddamned video that say this was a fake are rated down to the point at which they disappear. But not anymore!
The conspiracy theorists need that because it allows them to hold onto their desperate fantasy a little longer. I'm quite satisfied they went, for a multitude of reasons.
Apollo 11 never happened, all a lie. Ha ha! now yur all fucked with a whole page of lie theory comments by me, lets see you mark it down now, bitches! Test closed, I'm out for now, but I'll be back!
This has been flagged as spam show
I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
The videos include NASA archive material.
rhesusmonkey2012 1 month ago
@reallydisturbing ...... watch the opening credits of Star Trek which aired BEFORE Apollo -- Rodenberry did a superior job. He could actually put the stars in the back ground.... and music and credits. Kubrick did a suprior job. NASA couldn't even make the moon ball look better than a science fair project by a 3rd grader who rides the short bus. NASA NAZI = FAKE =FAIL
jerichomutant 6 months ago
@jerichomutant For the stars, same with your eyes or photography, you need long and high exposure (long stills) to see them, and since the moon doesn't have atmosphere the sun hits x times stronger on its surface, making it even harder to see them, the exposure of the cameras were designed so we could see the astronaut and details of the lunar surface, not the stars (since we can see them back home anyway).
eFFect0073 6 months ago
bdc3427 - if yer gonna troll, you really need to learn to do it better than that...
ProductSignSupplies 7 months ago
Arguing this is pointless. If you were to take these conspiracy tards to the moon, drag them up to the landing sites and shove their faces in the bootprints, they would STILL say it was all faked. Funny how the conspiracy kooks always think that THEY are REALLY the smart ones that cannot be fooled. I've not met one yet that has more than a rudimentary education, poor dental hygiene, and a chronic lack of female companionship.
smato68 9 months ago 2
If we went then.....and with technology so much more advanced y havent we gone back....they go back to other planets.... But not the moon? makes sense huh? they dont go cuz they know wen they do...we will finally see they lied ......cuz things they say are there arent an were never there
bdc3427 9 months ago
For sumone to say this happened they must have been drunk.....look at all the proof that it is fake ....and ur gunna talk about stars.you see more stars when get higher in elevation... An seriously...they went there to put a mirror there....haha surrrre.....they spent all that money time an people....to go there one time an JUST put a mirror their?
bdc3427 9 months ago
Who held the camera while Armstrong stepped first onto the moon? That's the question.
michaelpilot1000 10 months ago 2
@michaelpilot1000 That kind of information is hidden in books.
The Elite want to keep you stupid.
snakehipsohoolihan 9 months ago
@michaelpilot1000 it was attached to the side of the landing craft
animationdude56 9 months ago
@michaelpilot1000 There was a cam on the Eagle (a shitty but steady one)
eFFect0073 6 months ago
@michaelpilot1000 It was attached to the lunar module.Afterward they moved it away from the LM and mounted it on a tripod.
GGE47 4 months ago
i thought the transformers were there??
Revis 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored 10 months ago
Fake ghost astronauts
fuckutube74 1 year ago
im actually so tired of all these fags who are going on about how the apollo 11 moon landing was faked. it clearly happened. there are pictures of the landing site, explanations about the flag waving, and all that crap about the bent shadows. more evidence supporting that it happened than all these lame conspiracy theories
amor987654321 1 year ago 8
@amor987654321 where are the stars and the engine noise while landing and burnmarks when shuttle lifted off
iKingMeow 3 months ago
@iKingMeow there are reasonable explanations for both of those things.
1. if the cameras were designed to pick up the faint glow of the stars they would clearly over-expose the bright/reflective surface of the moon, and all u would see would be a glow
2. When the "shuttle" lifted off there were no burn marks, that is correct. to answer why that was the case u gotta learn about why burn marks are made and why they wouldnt be made in that environment. utube doesnt give me enough sapce to explain.
amor987654321 2 months ago
@iKingMeow yes and where is your brain
Jop3lius 1 week ago
HUBBLE HAS TAKEN PHOTOS OF THE LANDING SIGHT. ITS REAL
SulcZp 1 year ago
@SulcZp Got a link of that? Didn't think so.
realdrummer110 1 year ago
@realdrummer110
It's all over the place. Nice try though.
CaptainAmerica322 11 months ago
@SulcZp LIAR
fuckutube74 1 year ago
lets see if it was faked i like to kno how they got all that equipment up there like the rover and laser mirror and all the rest of the junk they left there how do you explain the rover tracks huum remote control may be.
mylowproject 1 year ago
Its real... its so real. Allow yourselves the pleasure of knowing the human race actually did this. The bullshit of politics and greed happened later on, but we did this. The world used to be very cool once upon a time. I know thats hard for youngsters to get their heads around. But before many of you were born, this happened. Just because you cant relate to it doesnt mean it didnt happen. Look at Phil Plait's website to get a good scientific explanation of how something this awesome is real.
SirCliveCalculator 1 year ago
Old Godzilla movies had better effects than this video
slypeppa 1 year ago
I am Iraqi...And yeah...We landed on the moon!
Azhy1973 1 year ago
To all of those people claiming this was fake because there are no stars... Because the moon has no atmosphere, there is nothing to scatter sunlight. Because of this, the light there is extremely bright, and any normal picture would have just been a whitewash. The cameras had light filters to block the majority of that light in order to actually be able to see the landscape Because starlight is so dim in comparison, any light they cast was filtered out in the process.
Purazuma2 1 year ago
Please tell me how the mirrors got on the surface of them moon, precisely placed, so that we can still today bounce lasers off of them with predictable results? There are mirrors there for a reason, at the landing sites.
@Those who say the missions were faked: Grow up, and stop believing such damaging lies. You only harm yourself, and worse, your children! Because they trust you to give accurate information. How dare you hurt them and their abilities to prosper!! Be intelligent, not "right"!
N0rthwestRadio 1 year ago
Let's Go Back then. This time with a Larger Spaceship that will remain in Earth Orbit after returning from the Moon. It can dock with the ISS and be used again.
The same spaceship can be resupplied and used for the Mars Mission.
Roadracer987654321 1 year ago
fuck lxfx u dont need shit here on earth to see the fucking stars u can clearly see them with your eyes any fucking cam should of been able to pick up some bright ass stars that was fake usa aint do shit they never made it there u dumb ass
youngwyte5 1 year ago
@youngwyte5 oh so you see the stars by day? no? so why in the moon should be see it by day?
FenixIzyuze 1 year ago
@youngwyte5
you can't take a photo of two things with such different degrees of brightness. The used negativefilms got a limitid range of contrast. Take a look at photos of the Shuttle-missions with astronauts doing an EVA. There are no stars.
Sam67SG 1 year ago
@youngwyte5 Wow. You are really brain-dead. Yet you still walk this earth. Your worthless reply has caused a few chuckles. Pathetic....
pacific707 1 year ago
one question why the hell is neil transparent
8bennugent 1 year ago
@8bennugent two way mirror on the moon.
datzfast 1 year ago
think about it her on earth we clearly see the stars at night bright stars far away but they ass on the damn moon u dont see not one stay man never been to the moon its bs think about it
youngwyte5 1 year ago
@youngwyte5 You idiot. It is extremely difficult to shoot stars in the blackness of night here on earth, using a modern digital camera. Imagine doing it using one from the '60s and on a Sun lit Moon. It would have been impossible to capture them.
LHFX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio. The evidence is crushing. Here's a link to a partial summary of it.
3W's (dot) brainsturbator (dot) com/forums/viewthread/1335/
(check link for gaps)
Also, do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".
FatFreddy88 1 year ago
where the fuck are the aliens? :/
RagingRaven123 1 year ago
all this time they are saying we can live on the moon or their life on the moon .. well i guess this confirms it, the ground look similar to earth
hateful22 1 year ago
i cant believe that little pod has 1/3rd the thrust of an equivalent earth rocket, a 300ton rocket sends 3920 kg to heights 250 km from earth, now a third of that mass in pure thruster rocket... 100,000kg would deliver an equivalent height on the moon., lets say a third of the height is required for lunar orbit, so 30,000kg of thruster, yet the module weighed less than 5000kg....
daenumen 1 year ago
@daenumen you mean 1/6th.
Submariner75 1 year ago
@Submariner75 that post didnt make sense to be fair. turns out that the rockets arent the problem with the lunar mission, but the evidences surrounding the landing,
im sure you've seen the pics with dust all around the lunar module, yet, in the landing footage, at 120ft? you can see the dust being blown across the surface, infact buzz also says so!, it looks like fast streeks of dust moving out of view from beneath the rocket across the surface. one of the many...
daenumen 1 year ago
@Submariner75 well, i say the rockets worked, according to the data presented wrt thrust, as for build, well, who knows.
the evidence in the mythbusters episode invalidate the flag (im not talking about the hypothesis), the pendulum footage - when sped up (though not by the larger factors posted), you can actually tell that the astronauts are struggling to move/open the crate, as you would expect (1/6th gravity - 6 x force can be applied by muscles, suit weight ~ W of man on earth.) etc etc.
daenumen 1 year ago
what happen with... youtube now we cant comment instantly!
ALIENSEVIDENCE 1 year ago
scribd (dot) com/nb812
DreamsofMajesty 2 years ago
The Soviets thought a moon landing was possible, they built the N1 rocket and a moon lander.
monkeyman1140 2 years ago
There were many problems with the N1 rocket though. It was a brilliant design, but clustering engines turned out to be a big drawback. They were only providing v2 thrust (i believe the specs mentioned either v2 or slightly higher) levels. Yet the added weight also had induced problems. That has been the main drawback of russian rockets for years.
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
I'll be back to spam this later
Quarashi747 2 years ago
Loser.
ruffa65 2 years ago
You say it is fake and call people retards. But when there is no evidence (Which is undebunkable I might add) to support your claim, then how is one to believe you? Especially when it has been proven to be done (Heck LCROSS photos alone confirm it) Learn some physics before making outrageous claims.
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably done in some fucking studio. ITS FAKE YOU RETARDS!
Quarashi747 2 years ago
its true, i could beleive that nasa could fool laypeople, but the soviets had the technology to monitor the moon landings, they found nothing amiss. they even put a story about the moon landings in pravda. but all these theorists, working out of their basements know better i suppose.
kansastwista 2 years ago
@Nasdaq7 you think the government wouldnt lie, you're a flat out moron
Tw1zTyD 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
would you trust anybody who says the "van allen belt" is safe for humans to be in. according to science, thats not possible without inches thick lead shielding... NASA contradicts itself everywhere, as shown very clearly (scientifically) here... search for "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly"
tubejokez 2 years ago
MoonFaker has it wrong, I suggest you do your own research, without someone telling you what they think the answer is.
With some digging at The Health Physics Society I found that the majority of (the low energies below 10 MeV) alpha and beta particles in the VAB would be stopped by 2 CM of aluminum. The astronauts were in fact exposed, but it was only about 2 rem during the most intense part of the VAB, and they were only in the belts for an hour at most.
Cougar333 2 years ago
Proof MOON LANDINGS DEFINITELY HAPPENED:
•astrophysicists, astronomers, aerospace engineers from all countries agree.
•1,000s of NASA employees & no whistle blowing
•842 lbs. of lunar samples verified by international geologists
•USSR & the UK tracked Apollo missions & monitored transmissions
•1,000s of photos & dozens of hrs of video/film
•Russian Premier Alexei Kosygin congratulated US
•Millions watched launches. 1,000s watched splashdowns.
ptraiders40 2 years ago 5
@ptraiders40 • those "astrophysicists, astronomers, aerospace engineers from all countries" aren't too credible because they have yet to figure out how to get their own countries to the moon. you know why? because its not possible yet!
• NASA has contradicted themselves many times about various details. and ADMITTED to fabricating the apollo 11 videos- claiming they'd gotten "erased".
• as for "lunar samples" how can anyone verify the authenticity, with nothing to compare them to?????
jusTOOfresh 1 year ago
@jusTOOfresh So you're saying that 400,00 people who worked on the program, every responsible scientist, journalist, and world leader, were fooled for decades but a handful of dopes on the internet have the truth? Don't you think that's kind of a stretch? You think after each President takes the oath that they just let him in on all these secrets and he just agrees to go along with the joke? I bet its fun to yank your chain on a lot of things. Just stay in the cave.
mduncan36 1 year ago
Comment removed
jusTOOfresh 1 year ago
@mduncan36 no that's not what I'm saying. But I am saying that you've been fooled. lol. Continue believing everything the Americam governement tells you, they have no reason to lie to gullible American's like yourself. I'm quite sure that there were not 400,000 people privy to the classified inner workings of the Apollo program. And some NASA employees have expressed skepticism regarding certain situations not limited the Apollo missions. Ignorance is bliss isn't it? Good day, sir
jusTOOfresh 1 year ago
@jusTOOfresh A Japanese space probe took pictures of the moon and found the remains of the Apollo missions on the surface, in Lehman's terms it proved that we walked on the Moon.
growinoutdafrofro 1 year ago
@growinoutdafrofro you can save the lehman's terms, but please be more specific. If you're referring to the "Kayuga" lunar probe photos I disagree. The photos are not clear enough to accurately discern any "remains" from the Apollo missions. There isn't even a picture of the flag. Those pictures are insubstancial and don't prove a thing.
jusTOOfresh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jusTOOfresh A Japanese space probe took pictures of the moon and found the remains of the Apollo missions on the surface, in Lehman's terms it proved that we walked on the Moon.
growinoutdafrofro 1 year ago
ive done my 9/11 homework. the info is all over the net. after intense comparison with omitted witness statements from the gov. report, ... i know 9/11 was an inside job. it is just as impossible, that we landed humans on the moon in 1969. all NASA's explanations to the countless flaws in the apollo mission, have the same character of total denial as the 9/11 gov. report ... its the same BS all the way.
tubejokez 2 years ago
@tubejokez Go get an aluminium hat and wear it please.
vava54own 1 year ago
If you were not alive in 1969, then you have no fucking right to say that it was fake.
Say it was fake to Neil Armstrong's face, see what happens...
OkiGuy23 2 years ago 3
@OkiGuy23 yea rewrite history, the man said swear you went to the moon and the austronaut cound not swear to it. so go ahead rewrite history. were all so proud of your type. i have a better one you swear on a holy bible we went to the moon.
datzfast 1 year ago
@OkiGuy23 If someone asked me to swear on something, or insisted I prove something to them, Id be the bigger man and not accommodate them either. Anyone that disrespectful deserves to be ignored.
N0rthwestRadio 1 year ago
if it was fake....then go recreate it. Approach shots and everything. explain it dynamically from a filmmakers point of view.
ReallyDisturbing 2 years ago 27
@ReallyDisturbing
A film maker's point of view isn't reality.
areud1 1 year ago
@ReallyDisturbing It can be faked now adays easy, especialy with a billion dollar budget that nasa had, but realy lets not contest what they say until we go to the moon and its there or not there. The Lazer thing isnt proof at all, we need to see the lunar landers there. Im just so surprised that we havent gone back and thats what leaves me questioning!
devinseven11 1 year ago 3
@devinseven11 If you google for LROC, you can see the pictures that the Orbiter has taken of the landing sites. It's also found the old Soviet Lunar rovers, and the Surveyor landing sites. There are a few reasons we haven't been back. a) it's incredibly expensive, b) we've been already and c) unmanned exploration is both cheaper and safer.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@ReallyDisturbing
Stanley Kubrick was a genius no doubt about it.
batfly 1 year ago
Yes, you are the only people smart enough to figure out it was a fake... Not any of the scientists or 98% of human kind. Congrats
bobrocks344 2 years ago 4
@bobrocks344 dont you mean 66 pecent of americans think we went to the moon?
if you as other nations its probably very low
datzfast 1 year ago
you still havent shown any proof
bobrocks344 2 years ago
On the moon there is no air which messes up your ability to measure distance
bobrocks344 2 years ago
they also need line of sight
TREFIVE 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
good thing nasa lost the original 42 tapes but its ok they found some in australia oh forgot they lost them too funny that.
bigfist255 2 years ago
Actually I heard osama bin laden built the lunar lander I don't know if it's true, but ...
jsilence418 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No moon landing sorry, fake, fake, fake, oh and there is no santa either apparently !
jsilence418 2 years ago
And guess what, Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes were kidnapped by Darth
Vader and frozen in carbonite. They
have been replaced by Cylon replicants
in order to make Scientology look
retarded. And Osama Bin Laden's
real name is Harold Kramer, born in
Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
vigo894 2 years ago
Test
ytuserfr1 2 years ago
I dont know if Appolo 11 set up any comunication disc but Appolo 12 did and that made talking back and forth so fast that it was like a normal conversation
mysay2u 2 years ago
GOOD JOB NEIL WERE ALL HERE FOR YA MAN :D
WWEISCLASS 2 years ago
Comment removed
Gameover571 2 years ago
People who still insist on propagating the hoax theories are ignorant, deluded, insecure or all three. There's a plethora of evidence, both physical and anecdotal, that proves they did go and yet these sad individuals desperately cling to a few perceived anomalies they hold up as "proof" the landings were fake. It's time to find another security blanket losers.
ruffa65 2 years ago 2
NASA are such goofballs, the co-called restored footage is SOFTER not sharper. Yes, it's free of specs and such, and a little brighter, but it's just another attempt to fool the world.
komodoman 2 years ago
you try renewing footage from 1969 to DVD quality.
derning302 2 years ago
Speaking of lies and propaganda....
See a PAN make an ass of himself...
watch?v=qYSm0f7opSo
watch?v=Gr0ZmABfugE
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people may believe it was a hoax may be due to the efforts of a small number of people who make a living by selling books and videos 'exposing the hoax'. The trouble these people run into is that because it was not a hoax, they have to work very hard to make it seem, however tenuously, that it was. The consequence of this is that the claims they make are both idiotic and farcical in their desperate attempts to get you to part with your cash.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
No time delay between messages broadcast live on TV in 1969.
Now they claim all the time delays have been edited out.
Lies to cover lies!
moonscam 2 years ago
Moonscam
You do understand that the Moon is close enough to Earth that time delays would almost not even be noticable? It would only be about a second or 2
manmythlegend12 2 years ago
Yes I understand the average distance between Earth and Moon is about 239,000 miles.
A radio signals travels at the speed of light which is 186,200 miles per second.
So the time delay is 1.28 seconds each way or 2.567 seconds altogether, that's assuming there's no delay in the transmitting equipment and the other person replies the split second the fist person releases the mike.
Now listen for the 2.5 to 3 second delays.
moonscam 2 years ago
it was such a big deal to land on the moon.... in a few years its gonna sooo easy heheheheh evolution is funny
UltimateTuffle 2 years ago
fake ass shit
ChiefyJr 2 years ago 5
the little rascals films from the 30's are better restored than this but then again those kids were better actors than these fools.
bigfist255 2 years ago 3
Everything is there except the green aliens
ladomiroff 2 years ago 11
Pretend Bobbbbbable is gone, go ahead, but I'm sorry to say that reality is far from your pretentious Bobbbbbable-free lala land.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
You all thought, oh, Bobbbbbable is just a stupid loser, some dumbshit troll, he/she'll go away, don't worry about it. The attack is over. WRONG!! Bobbbbbable the hotheaded hateful troll is still here, this video aint safe. Watch out youtube, here we come.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
Go ahead and rate these comments down. I'll just put more up for you. Eternal work.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
Rating down comments as usual, I see!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
wat the background music???
kongkiakeng 2 years ago
at 01:12 why are they see through
bassmanseal 2 years ago
Restored video or better special effects team :P
memphisto23 2 years ago
hoooooooaaaaxxx
sedatedmonkey 2 years ago
yup, and in 100 years, still not a soul will be able to go the the moon because dammit unless u r behind 1 metre of solid iron/lead you brain getsirradiated to the core
iwsab 2 years ago
youtube got commercial now?
gotbebo1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm NOT done with this video. I'll be back for more brutality. Just wait!!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Geez, bobbbbbable, yur such a mean jerk!! He he, that's right.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And to all the geniuses that insist, "you talking about not silencing people, bobbbbbable, you just silenced us all by putting up all that spam and pushing our comments back so many minipages". But that's precisely the reason why I did that, because I want everyone to feel how it's like to have your opinions all silenced and put to the back. I did it in response to your actions.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To all the Einsteins who point out, "but you don't have a website!", of course not, I just put that up to see if people are going to be willing to mark all those comments as spam!! Cuz if you do, yull have a whole mini-page of them.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
YouTube is a fucking free forum, goddamnit!!! Stop fucking silencing people!! FUCKING SHIT!!!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
Just for all the fuckers out there, Bobbbbbable is not a stupid conspiracy believer, she/he doesn't really think it was faked or anything. I just said that because I'm tired of seeing anyone who does voice a dissenting opinion here being shunned out to a minus 6.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
Ha ha, yeah motherfuckers, I got them up!!! I GOT THEM UP!!! THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR RATING MY FUCKING COMMENTS DOWN MINUS 6!!!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read those damned comments backwards!! DUH!!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just do it! Read it reversed!!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read them reversed!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That comment I just posted about six times, read it backwards. Each word is forward, just the sentences are reversed. That's the minus six invisible comment that I put up right after my fakeness rant!!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
!Back be I'll but, now for out I'm, closed test! Bitches, now down it mark you see lets, me by comments theory lie of page whole a with fucked all yur now! Ha ha. Lie a all, happened never 11 Apollo.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
That's right, all the fuckers who try to rate down the conspiracy theorists are no longer all-powerful.
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
In fact, everyone's in a trap right now. Either leave my comments alone and don't rate them down, or have a whole "view all" page with invisible comments, quite unsightly!! HA HA, who's the man now dog? ME, Bobbbbbable.
Fuck the Associated Press, yur video just got fucked up good. >:-)
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
I just put a whole bunch of comments up that say it's a fake!! So many, click view all and the whole first page is covered with them. That's way too many for people to be marking them down!!! HA HA
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
Ha ha, everybody loses except me. All the fucking comments on this goddamned video that say this was a fake are rated down to the point at which they disappear. But not anymore!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
A pixel on a picture is a proof ?
k00gan 2 years ago
Please give me an URL to the photos !
k00gan 2 years ago
Indeed. It's become some fad losers hold onto. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter should have killed most conspiracy theories beyond doubt.
ruffa65 2 years ago
nasa released those photos. that's why there are doubters. what we need is an independent satellite or telescope that can take the pics
951tony 2 years ago
The conspiracy theorists need that because it allows them to hold onto their desperate fantasy a little longer. I'm quite satisfied they went, for a multitude of reasons.
ruffa65 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apollo 11 never happened, all a lie. Ha ha! now yur all fucked with a whole page of lie theory comments by me, lets see you mark it down now, bitches! Test closed, I'm out for now, but I'll be back!
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally fake
bobbbbbable 2 years ago