Floridians in this district should be ashamed ofd themselves if they re-elect this clown, or ANY liberal that will swallow Obama-mania hook, line, and sinker. Boyd is toast anyway, because Lawson is going to smoke him in the primary.
Boy, you sure can tell you are a flamin' liberal. I think you know that's not a compliment either. Oh, by the way, I do not listen to FOX news radio. I have a job, where I actually DO something, so I can't keep my ear glued to a radio. Just for the record, the "mania" tag long predates FOX news radio. Maybe you haven';t heard about people who make assumptions.
oo sassy. I'm not a flamin' liberal, actually, I consider myself an independent with socially liberal beliefs and am moderate in fiscal matters. And the ObamaManiaTM did come from fox, so I'm not wrong about that. Yes, you can add mania to everything, but no one was saying obamamania until fox news. And it's a valid assumption to make. Not liking Obama or his policies is one thing, but tea baggers and the 'obama is a socialist' sayers are the ones who generally use obamamania
what does it matter where it comes from? why hate on fox news? should i point out how CNN is owned by GE which is partially owned by the federal government. So why is it that you hate on fox?
why hate on fox news? Because fox contradicts itself. It professes to want free speech, but then sides with the super model who sued google for someone on a blog insulting her. She won. They also are spreading lies about the health care bill. Not agreeing with universal healthcare is one thing, making up lies about death panels is another.
The senate removed the "death" panels on august 13th Ashley. How can the senate remove death panels if there were no death panels? Don't give me that crap
just go check out the bill and its amendments on Thomas . loc . gov (spaced out on purpose.)
It's funny. All of the major "news" channels air programs that are primarily editorial/entertainment. Your perpetuating a logical fallacy when you equate these editorial programs with news. The actual news on FOX is virtually identical to the news on every other channel. The reality is that no one knows what is in this health care bill. Even the president has admitted being fuzzy on the details.
True, the actual news headlines on fox are mostly actual news, but fox has an insane amount of opinion /entertainment shows. The difference is that most of them don't actually act like entertainment shows, they act like news anchors. Also Fox doesn't have any centrist or democratic shows, or even co hosts of shows. It's all to the right, if you exclude the surprising shepard smith.
Ohhhhh, you are not a flaming lib huh? Well if we take your advice on assumption, then you are a Janeane Garofalo-ite, since she is getting credit for coining the "tea-bagger" phrase. Hey, don't be ashamed. You can't help that you have been spoon fed by the US educational system (the bastian of liberal talking heads) and the main stream media. You have my deepest sympathy.
lol Janeane Garofalo. She says smart things sometimes, but sometimes she's an idiot as well. And liberal educational system? Let's solve this right now, since you are apparently from a school. What do you think about evolution? Global warming? If you think either of these things are not real, you auto fail. And I like the tea bagger phrase for obvious reasons. It fits a group of people who didn't bitch during bush admin. spending but feels now is the time to worry about money.
See, you betray your ignorance by once again assuming things. You are obviously out of touch with reality, or maybe you are deaf, I don't know (see how I am not assuming), but anyy REAL conservative did a whole lot of griping about President Bush spending like a DEM. By your choice of words, and the way that you apparently swallow lib spew hook, line, and sinker, I would be willing to guess you are young (under 30). I can almost smell the Similac on your breath. As far as global warming, if you
My choice of words eh? Not that I have my age clearly posted along with a picture of me on my channel page? Being under or over 30 makes no difference, as wisdom is not brought about by age(although age can help.. sometimes). And your comment on global warming was cut off, I'm assuming. p.s.Funny how I heard not a word from the right about Bush during his administration. You might have been saying something, but your party certainly wasn't.
Well, I have not been to your "page", so I wouldn't know your age. As far as the party, Bush's approval dropped to 60% among "Republicans" so he wasn't given carte blanche by any stretch. True conservatives have given him grief o' plenty about his Liberal Democratesque spending (can you say TARP?). As far as my global warming comment, in a nutshell, its a load of crap.
and it's a load of crap because the scientific community says it's false? Or because the right, whose politicians are noticeably in the pockets of oil companies, say so? Even Bush, an oil man himself, admitted near the end of his presidency that he accepted the evidence of man 'influenced' climate change. Because I assure you the people who actually 'study' climate for a living, scientists, agree that we are negatively influencing climate change.
So ..many...wrong...ideas...Ok. I agree that the commentary shows on FOX are conservative, but that's where the money is for "news" programs. Ratings suggest that people who are more liberal in their views consume less news. And what do you mean if you don't believe in man made global warming "auto-fail?" The science behind that is VERY murky, and the entire issue has become highly politicized.
The scientific community that puts man made global warming as fact are the same ones that predicted the catastrophic consequences of "global cooling" in the 1970's. I wasn't sure what to think about global warming until I took up the challenge of rebutting a fellow educator at the school at which I work. Do a little independent research, focus on the warming trends in Europe in the 1300's and the relationship between sunspots and the "warming" of the Earth. You will be surprised ashleypoo.
global warming is extremely politicized... in politics. After all, whereas the constituents of the left are environmentalists and hippies, you have oil companies on the right. But scientists don't care about politics. The vast majority of scientists agree that 'Climate Change' is being affected and noticeably by humans. The earth has warmed, and only a small fraction of the scientific community ever talked about global cooling, a fringe. To say global warming is a lie is to say that NASA, NOAA
and every other scientific organization in America, including countries with no political investment in the idea, are just wrong. I'm not saying the world will end within 100 years because of climate change, but it is negatively affecting all sorts of things, and can get pretty serious if we don't do anything.
I mean, from what you've written, you don't think that the current President of our great nation is a socialist, with a socialist agenda. If you can't see that, then I, nor anybody else can help you. So you just enjoy your Garofalo-mania, ohhh, wait, did I get that from Fox News?
Floridians in this district should be ashamed ofd themselves if they re-elect this clown, or ANY liberal that will swallow Obama-mania hook, line, and sinker. Boyd is toast anyway, because Lawson is going to smoke him in the primary.
RMSBears 2 years ago
Obama mania? Boy you sure can tell you listen to fox news radio.... that's not a compliment :D
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
Boy, you sure can tell you are a flamin' liberal. I think you know that's not a compliment either. Oh, by the way, I do not listen to FOX news radio. I have a job, where I actually DO something, so I can't keep my ear glued to a radio. Just for the record, the "mania" tag long predates FOX news radio. Maybe you haven';t heard about people who make assumptions.
RMSBears 2 years ago
oo sassy. I'm not a flamin' liberal, actually, I consider myself an independent with socially liberal beliefs and am moderate in fiscal matters. And the ObamaManiaTM did come from fox, so I'm not wrong about that. Yes, you can add mania to everything, but no one was saying obamamania until fox news. And it's a valid assumption to make. Not liking Obama or his policies is one thing, but tea baggers and the 'obama is a socialist' sayers are the ones who generally use obamamania
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
what does it matter where it comes from? why hate on fox news? should i point out how CNN is owned by GE which is partially owned by the federal government. So why is it that you hate on fox?
cartier117 2 years ago
why hate on fox news? Because fox contradicts itself. It professes to want free speech, but then sides with the super model who sued google for someone on a blog insulting her. She won. They also are spreading lies about the health care bill. Not agreeing with universal healthcare is one thing, making up lies about death panels is another.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
There are "death" panels.
The senate removed the "death" panels on august 13th Ashley. How can the senate remove death panels if there were no death panels? Don't give me that crap
just go check out the bill and its amendments on Thomas . loc . gov (spaced out on purpose.)
cartier117 2 years ago
in fact H.R. 3372
establishes measures that would allow the government to tell doctors how many people they can treat, and where they can live.
very anti-democratic/freewill don't you think?
cartier117 2 years ago
It's funny. All of the major "news" channels air programs that are primarily editorial/entertainment. Your perpetuating a logical fallacy when you equate these editorial programs with news. The actual news on FOX is virtually identical to the news on every other channel. The reality is that no one knows what is in this health care bill. Even the president has admitted being fuzzy on the details.
WakullaStyle 2 years ago
True, the actual news headlines on fox are mostly actual news, but fox has an insane amount of opinion /entertainment shows. The difference is that most of them don't actually act like entertainment shows, they act like news anchors. Also Fox doesn't have any centrist or democratic shows, or even co hosts of shows. It's all to the right, if you exclude the surprising shepard smith.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
Ohhhhh, you are not a flaming lib huh? Well if we take your advice on assumption, then you are a Janeane Garofalo-ite, since she is getting credit for coining the "tea-bagger" phrase. Hey, don't be ashamed. You can't help that you have been spoon fed by the US educational system (the bastian of liberal talking heads) and the main stream media. You have my deepest sympathy.
RMSBears 2 years ago
lol Janeane Garofalo. She says smart things sometimes, but sometimes she's an idiot as well. And liberal educational system? Let's solve this right now, since you are apparently from a school. What do you think about evolution? Global warming? If you think either of these things are not real, you auto fail. And I like the tea bagger phrase for obvious reasons. It fits a group of people who didn't bitch during bush admin. spending but feels now is the time to worry about money.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
See, you betray your ignorance by once again assuming things. You are obviously out of touch with reality, or maybe you are deaf, I don't know (see how I am not assuming), but anyy REAL conservative did a whole lot of griping about President Bush spending like a DEM. By your choice of words, and the way that you apparently swallow lib spew hook, line, and sinker, I would be willing to guess you are young (under 30). I can almost smell the Similac on your breath. As far as global warming, if you
RMSBears 2 years ago
My choice of words eh? Not that I have my age clearly posted along with a picture of me on my channel page? Being under or over 30 makes no difference, as wisdom is not brought about by age(although age can help.. sometimes). And your comment on global warming was cut off, I'm assuming. p.s.Funny how I heard not a word from the right about Bush during his administration. You might have been saying something, but your party certainly wasn't.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
Well, I have not been to your "page", so I wouldn't know your age. As far as the party, Bush's approval dropped to 60% among "Republicans" so he wasn't given carte blanche by any stretch. True conservatives have given him grief o' plenty about his Liberal Democratesque spending (can you say TARP?). As far as my global warming comment, in a nutshell, its a load of crap.
RMSBears 2 years ago
and it's a load of crap because the scientific community says it's false? Or because the right, whose politicians are noticeably in the pockets of oil companies, say so? Even Bush, an oil man himself, admitted near the end of his presidency that he accepted the evidence of man 'influenced' climate change. Because I assure you the people who actually 'study' climate for a living, scientists, agree that we are negatively influencing climate change.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
Comment removed
RMSBears 2 years ago
So ..many...wrong...ideas...Ok. I agree that the commentary shows on FOX are conservative, but that's where the money is for "news" programs. Ratings suggest that people who are more liberal in their views consume less news. And what do you mean if you don't believe in man made global warming "auto-fail?" The science behind that is VERY murky, and the entire issue has become highly politicized.
WakullaStyle 2 years ago
The scientific community that puts man made global warming as fact are the same ones that predicted the catastrophic consequences of "global cooling" in the 1970's. I wasn't sure what to think about global warming until I took up the challenge of rebutting a fellow educator at the school at which I work. Do a little independent research, focus on the warming trends in Europe in the 1300's and the relationship between sunspots and the "warming" of the Earth. You will be surprised ashleypoo.
WakullaStyle 2 years ago
global warming is extremely politicized... in politics. After all, whereas the constituents of the left are environmentalists and hippies, you have oil companies on the right. But scientists don't care about politics. The vast majority of scientists agree that 'Climate Change' is being affected and noticeably by humans. The earth has warmed, and only a small fraction of the scientific community ever talked about global cooling, a fringe. To say global warming is a lie is to say that NASA, NOAA
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
and every other scientific organization in America, including countries with no political investment in the idea, are just wrong. I'm not saying the world will end within 100 years because of climate change, but it is negatively affecting all sorts of things, and can get pretty serious if we don't do anything.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
I mean, from what you've written, you don't think that the current President of our great nation is a socialist, with a socialist agenda. If you can't see that, then I, nor anybody else can help you. So you just enjoy your Garofalo-mania, ohhh, wait, did I get that from Fox News?
RMSBears 2 years ago
and on the subject of Bush spending, three words: cost plus contracting.
ashleypoo1319 2 years ago
Why do you have to do this? Garofalo was great in the matchmaker. Sheesh.
WakullaStyle 2 years ago
but you are right they were not literally called death panels.
cartier117 2 years ago
More please, I'd like to see more of this
Ivan32304 2 years ago