Added: 4 years ago
From: xrsanchez12x
Views: 62,087
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (180)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Well if they are so slow what are you driving? My dsm will kill you on the 1/4

  • Haha cobalts and eclipses = super slow

  • wats up with that supercharged piece of crapxP

  • That ss is scheduled. Could you not hear that whine?? Rims don't mean anything my 07 ss/sc has chrome rims

  • Ya thats an NA cobalt SS ...it has the shiny wheels not the powdered wheels that the supercharged ones have

  • lol usa lost again...

  • Looks like a non-supercharged cobalt ss. Some came with supercharger and some did not.

  • The 3g can run 1/4 stock in about 16...need better tires to take advantage of that N2O

  • 16s sounds about right with a crap launch

  • Where's the purge? I have a nitrous powered Bigwheel that you should race instead

  • its probably a 4cyl eclipse and a n/a cobalt, the supercharger noise is coming from another car doing a burnout.

  • the supercharged ss cobalts get a 2.0 not a 2.4L. the 2.4 is non turbo or supercharged. they switched the supercharger for a turbo and got 60 more hp out of it in 08 I believe. you can still get a 2.4L but it isn't supercharged or turbo stock and its just for an upgraded interior in the ss trim. basicly all I am saying is it has a 2.0 s/c motor and probably a sri or cai due to the louder s/c

  • i ran 15.7 in a 2004 cavalier 5spd with just a muffler and a cold air intake.... not boost no juice! wtf happened here?

  • no a stock cobalt SS SC can't run a 14.3... they run a 14.9 so the kid in the vid cant drive.

  • @jammann13 really? near stock 2.4 5spd cobalts have run 14.8s.

  • @DOHCCordia yes sir stock 2.4 SC cobalt runs a 14.8 my buddies did it consistently

  • @jammann13 no offense but when my cobalt ss 2.0 s/c was stock i ran a 14.1 and thats cuz i couldnt hook so somethings wrong there

  • @89Jsharp u gotta have somethin aftermarket... from the factory they will not run a 14.1....

  • @89Jsharp nope bone stock bud no need to lie im not sure what it would run now with my stage 3 and other mods..

  • @jammann13 there launch sucked so 16 seems about right

  • if ya want a good Eclipse go with a 1G or 2G GST. Limitless possibilities.

  • @pinkypimpalicous fuck a gst, you want a gsx

  • @NissanTy you're right. I at the time couldnt find the AWD version, but the GST was pretty awesome at the time.

  • its not the cars.....its the drivers...

  • 00:50 The light goes green

    16sec later at 1:06 win light.

    Video don't lie, There was nothing wrong with the timing system.

    The times are slow cause the cars are slow. The only time youll ever get a 3G GT to be quick is if you either 3.5 swap or SDS.

  • The cobalt ss sc can run a 14.9 bone stock either the kid can't drive or the times are wrong

  • @jammann13 the kid said the sensors were fucked up

  • @jammann13

    actually 14.3 so ya. Lol

  • @GarrettKeetley both cars are great if u do em up right

  • wtf.. both cars ran low 16s wow thats shitty my talon is a stock TSI and it runs mid 15s

  • why would you even bother with a 50 shot. I bet a 100 shot isn't even tickling it. 50 makes probably 30 to the tire, its a total waste.

  • If they were having difficulties that caused the ET to be so high, why does it still seem like it took 16 seconds from start to near finish (based on the video clock)? When the win light came on 17 seconds after the race started, the cars are where they should be. Just wondering.

  • wow both of those were slow.

  • @tomjw7 thats because they are front wheel drive

  • @tomjw7 thats because they are front wheel drive and theyr driving in the wet so they get loads of wheel spin

  • @dartbal they didnt have enough wheel spin to get those crappy numbers. these cars need a driver mod

  • @tomjw7 what u drive?

  • @crazyboondocker 09 cobalt ss full boltons - catback, and 22 psi tune. somewhere around 330whp

  • if the cobalt had stage 2 or a 50 shot as well it woulda ate that eclipse, but i do havta say nice win...

  • So why would you comment on those "slow times" if you read the video description.

  • lol my bone stock scion tc did 16.2

  • @TCracer23 so with these bad track sensors it would be...what...18.2?

  • wow those are really bad times.. And the eclipse had NOS and did 16 in a 1/4M? thats brutally sad.

  • @bettermaxim

    Can you read at all?

  • @papaown wat? what kind of stupid question is this? Do i have eyes? yes did you just ask me a stupid question? yes

  • NO! MONICA!

  • @Curlyhfb7 i was thinking the same thing

  • hope you said "minaje" when you spayed

  • hope you said "minaje" when you spayed

  • lol yea damn ricers!!!! its clearly a 1/8 mile... clearly!!! lol lol lol

    Don't look at my channel youll only uncover my secrets!!!

  • wow 16 sec in the 1/8 mile? go kill yourself ricers

  • go 3g go

  • my god, i was running a 13.72@101.4 in my '02 Eclipse GT 5 spd, with cai, headers, downpipe and a 75 shot with stage 3 act clutch. 16's?! gah..

  • superchargers sound awfull.... turbo ftw

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • can a eclipse stock engine take 150 shot of nos?

  • No waaaayyyyy. The stock internals run a max of 300whp on a heavily tuned supercharger. You'd crack your pistons with a 150shot shocker on full.

  • well i know with better upgrades it could take it but im tryna go turbo on a 2000 gt dont wanna do nos turbo will always be better

  • huh?

  • i think if you want to get a turbo then you need to get higher pressure pistons that could withstand the turbo. at least thats what my friend said. its only with the 3g eclipse though

  • sorry to say this but your friend is a dumb ass. you use lower compression pistons if you want to run boost. that goes for any import. the lower the compression, the higher the boost you can run.

  • well either way, the stock pistons wont support a turbo. i didnt know exactly what he said but it was probably what you just said

  • stock pistons if they are good, can support up to ~10psi, depends on how good. some cars come stock with forged shit. but you really should get a forged rotating assembly (pistons, crank, rods) and better head, rod, and main bolts, etc...

  • It will help it last longer but eventually it will wear the engine down

  • nos doesnt hurt your engine like a turbo does

  • thats not true! NOS does hurt your engine! hit it before 3k or put 50+ shot in to a stock car and watch the fireworks! but it is true a turbo can also hurt your motor, if the first surge that comes and hits to hard, it can break shit, and their is problems with pre-detonation, etc...

  • Nos does wear out engines especially if youre an idiot and dont know how to use it. and turbos are the same way they're hard on engines and even harder when these idiots crank up the boost.

  • It can wear out the motor, yes. It all depends on if you set it up correctly. Same goes for any other form of boost.

    Boosting a stock motor is never Ideal. Nitrous can be run dependably for a long time if run correctly. Using a window switch is also always going to help so that it only sprays at a certain RPM and only at wide open throttle.

  • NOS will only hurt your engine if you use it the wrong way. a turbo on the other hand will hurt the engine regardless

  • tecnically a turbo will only hurt your motor if you use it wrong also...

  • how can you use a turbo the wrong way?

  • @CxStatic putting one on a motor not made for it, wrong fuel to air mix, over boosting etc...

  • wtf does all that mean?

  • gotta love aluminum pistons... damn you mitsu!!!!

  • i hope you all kno that was a SS/NA

    this is so stupid.....

  • You deaf or what?..listen to that whine @ 0:51

  • its a supercharged u asshole do you not hear the wine

  • thy made about 13 secs !!! its true,those sensors had delay !!!

  • What does that ean

  • who won?

  • eclipse did

  • technical problems... like what.. your car is taking forever to get down here..

  • its not a s/c cobalt. its a regular 2.4 ss or an ls with the 2.4 ss rims, you can tell by the rims and spoiler. the s/c whine is the car behind them burning out

  • lol "times are so slow they were having technical problems with the sensors down at the end of the track" hahahaha bullshit. If you're going to post a video on youtube and make a statement like that, think before you do. There is a time bar at the bottom of the vid and i counted....16 close to 17 secs for BOTH cars.

  • how can u tell where the 1 4 mile mark is dumbass

  • How can you stupid ass?

  • ummm dude.. shut the fuck up..i was responding to someone who tried to say he counted to 16 before the light came up with the time.. so he was trying to say the time was accurate.. i was busting him out..

    u came out of nowhere with a lame comment that doesnt make any sense.. and i actually was busting a guy out trying to say he counted the time it took from start to finish

    so fuck you

  • wow, they should have a minimum ET time below 16secs for cars to run the quaters

  • wus there a rice rocket right b4 u.??

    XDD

  • wow the guy in the cobalt needs more practice on his launches. I know its hard as hell the cobalt cuz i have one but damn...

  • Zex kit sucks.

  • a 50 shot gives 50 hp dumbass. shot is slang for how much power u gain per jet

  • the batle of the 16sec cars

  • That's funny.

    The nitrous was probably like a 50 shot to only give 25hp/25 lbs/ft.

    Nothing like nitrous on stock intervals.

  • Both cars sucks. I have a 1999 Mitsubishi mirage DE and is doing 15.6 with stock motor.

  • the 260hp Cobalts were the turbo models. the 205hp the supercharged models...

  • turbo cobalts where you live lol ss was only cobalt from factorey rest would be after markit

  • Huh? They used to have SS/SC Cobalts, then they went turbocharged

  • even those cars are a garbage compared to a..9/11 turbo. HA dumbass of course the higher u spend of course u will get more hp stock dumbass. if u gonna compare at least compare something that is in the same price range as these two cars. dumbasses

  • the times were slow caz ur car is a piece of shit.. i timed it

  • both these cars are a joke.

    -'08 pontiac g8 will blow ya away

  • hahaahahaha 16! with nitrous? hahaah

  • thankfully I have an f-body, so i dont have to worry about low dyno numbers.. my eclipse is my dd

  • I have a 4g Eclipse GT and it seems to be quite a bit faster than the 3g, Still not as fast as the 2g turbo tho.

  • thank god someone who owns a post 2g and aknowledges the 4g63

  • A Cobalt should run mid 14's from the factory... hopefully this was shot in like utah because those times are TERRIBLE! and Eclipses generally dont make nearly as much on a dyno than what they are rated at.. most stock cobalt ss (sc) make 205whp.. just saying..

  • read the information dumbass

  • your kinda retarded, I like cobalts but eclipses atleast the 3g rs models like mine are rated at 150 and usually stock dyno up around 155 or 160 like in my friends but eclipse vscobalt is fun bcuz its mainly the driver who wins or loses not the machine!

  • stock cobalt ss/sc does around 180whp, its 205hp to the crank. My cobalt is doing 251whp

  • stock cobalts do 260 whp you dumb ass

  • you obviously dont drive a cobalt do you. 2 of my friends have the ss/tc and only dynoed at 232whp. Like i said before 260hp is to the crank. Same as the 205hp ss/sc...its around 180whp. Get your facts straight before you come on the net and start calling people dumbasses

  • GM rated the SS/SC @ 205 whp, although most dyno at around 215 whp. The stock horsepower is underrated.

  • all depends on the dyno and the atmosphere. Here in canada we rate our cars with the SAE setting on dyno. Most, if not all dyno's in the states rate the dyno in STD setting.

  • snakes where in canada u live? i got a s/c balt i live in saskatoon :P gotta rep the maple leaf :D

  • i live in Nova scotia but i work in NB, but the army is posting me to edmonton in a few weeks, huge cobalt meet there in a couple months, last i checked it was like 60 cobalts...cant wait to run the car for the first time on the track

  • thats tight i was gonna go to edmonton but its a 5 hour drive lol lil to far gonna wait for something lil closer

  • I'm totally agree.

  • Hey, im thinking about buying a black, 2000 eclipse GT (V6 3.0L). 130,000 miles on it. Needs realigning and new tie rods. He wanted 4600, i said no, he said 3300. What do you think?

  • if he droped it so quickly he might be despret to get rid of the car id say 3000 at best but if u got him down that far its a great deal id go for it. the tie rods a nd a realidning shouldnt coust the 1300 you saved there if you get it.

  • hes dropping so much bc these cars suck dick.. i have a 2001 eclipse gt v6 3.0 l these cars are slow as all can be.. if your looking at getting a quick car,, get a 2g w turbo

  • dude he has a wet kit on his car that will boost the power and it will shift quicker. the GT will win every time. spray is cheap and who ever has a spray kit is a pussy cuz its fake power.

  • Fake power or not, it gets the job done!!! and it may be cheap but if your broke ass don't have money for refills then nitrous is not for you!!!

  • ahaha nice

  • Comment removed

  • america bullshit junking shitty

  • Cobalt is better than the eclipse.

    but

    its obviouse, the car aint everything.

    Cobalt got owned.

  • damn i love the whine of a supercharger

    any other mods to the eclipse??

  • and again....really if you gonna comment on something make sure you know what you are talking about.....dumbass

  • wow are you proud to beat a V6 mustang anyone can do that they are a piece of shit.....you should be beating the V8 ones...i do...but then again i bet a you suck at driving....so shut the hell up

  • Cobalt would beat any stock Eclipse.  I own a 06 Cobalt SS/SC and I've beaten V6 Mustangs, Eclipse, Civic Si, and a Sentra.

  • won't beat my evo IX..i could beat you in reverse..

  • mm yeah you would beat me but look at how much you had to spend on it.

  • bring yur evo ix see what you can do to my mustang gt

  • That is, if you owned an evo. :D

  • well i beat a cobalt on my gt eclipse like 2 month ago.its not just the car that matters is hhow you drive it

  • Mostly it's the car though. =D

    ESPECIALLY if it's auto trans.

  • Maybe, if there was an infant behind the wheel of the cobalt. The stock Eclipse GT is only pushin' 201whp while the Cobalt SS's are throwing 235whp at the ground.

  • True but this guy is representing his car so he gets a thumbs up. And that guy in the cobalt is not doing such a good job having more hp. And I never said the eclipse was a faster car. That's why I said its how you drive it

  • Those WHP specs you gave are definantly off because i think both are about even, and i believe they both have about 205 AT THE CRANK. dyno's of stock eclipses show about 170 WHP. and the cobalt cant have much more or else it's sad because they should be able to beat the eclipse by more than half a second or so if they have 30+ more WHP.

  • Actually, the the specs are true. My buddy and I had his 01 Eclipse GT tested on a dyno, for a baseline before we put the new pistons and intake on it. 201.3hp/191fptq. If you'd like, i'll email you the chart. With the Cobalt, i'm not so sure because i just looked it up on the net. And the internet can sometimes be one of the least reliable sources of info. Example; The KA24de that i have in my car DEAD STOCK, 198whp. Now we all know that's bullshit. lol

  • last time i checked... the Cobalt maybe has that much horsepower.. ON THE CRANK. plus, the eclipse got way more torque

  • actually it doesnt it should have around the same horsepower 205-210 and torque rating at the crank being around 210. Though every car is different and weather conditions will make all readings on a dyno different.

  • thats before wetshot

  • I have a 2001 Eclipse GT..Imported Engine from Japan (the valves are alot bigger) and I've taken down the 07 mustangs, cobalts, and a G35

  • BUT, can you prove it? And if it is an imported engine, what is it?

  • maybe the eclipse was supercharged?.. yeah because i know for a fact the cobalts that are supercharged have a different spoiler. unless he put an aftermarket supercharger. eclipses succkkkk!

  • good job, notice all the shit talkers who hate on the eclipse..dont even own a car ...lol

    is urz stock? nice

  • I hear a supercharger...

  • JeepXtreme4x4, um yeah, that would be the cobalt, as descriped in the description of the video

  • I know there are supercharged cobalts, but I was thinking that supercharger whine was not coming from the Cobalt.. That was way too loud, I was thinking it was from a car getting ready to go next..

  • No dude. That's the supercharger. I hate that whine by the way. Power from them is nice though. Turbos sound a lot better.

  • gm gmc chevy loser shitty scam shitty idiot

  • gm gmc chevy loser shitty scam shitty

  • The Cobalt had to be an AUTOMTC, the 5spd would kill it.

  • 200hp vs 200hp, plus you need some to run the supercharger. no way the cobalt kill the GT and i'm not a eclipse fan at all.

  • The Cobalt's HP is grossly underated for Insurance savings and to call it an "Eco-coupe". 2nd, then it's a power/weight thing. The Eclipse had a Spray on. Lastly, I own an '01 Eclipse GT w/ a custom intake (in the form of a Sebring LXi) A neighbor has an SS s/c, and he walks me handily from a stop. And from a roll it's laughable. If my motor was DOHC (& not SOHC) I'd be a bigger fan. There's just no heart.

  • the SS is supercharged lol a def person can hear that lol ma brother owns a eclpise with greddy exhaust and k&n cold air intake and he just straped on a bottle of wonder juice yesterday lol he gonna smash cobalts lol haha

  • is this guy fucking retarded you can hear the supercharger wow ive lost all respect for ppl now

  • all cobalt ss are supercharged

  • they make a 2.4 na ss to

  • Agreeing with Ganymede5276 that Cobalt was supercharged just listen... and the Eclipse still beat it.

  • The only thing after market on my 00 eclipse gt is an bigger intake manifold, full borla exhaust, aem intake and an aftermarket clutch and i pull a 14.9...its still slow as piss but sure beats a 16+

  • 14.9, not so slow for that kind of boat.

  • I own a 2000 Eclipse GT. Its simply an economy car with a decent balance of gas mileage and power. Its not impressive when it comes to racing. The V6 3.0 will eventually have alot of decent aftermarket parts and be a decent engine. I'm a muscle car guy myself and don't care to race something like this.

  • they came out with the GT for longevity.And 1999 was the last year of the DSMs so they decided to change a few things.

  • how can you have the eclipse gs-t and gsx and then come out with then come out with that heavy ass GT?

  • Wow, you can hear the supercharger on the cobalt, great info...

  • You better be able to pull a better time than 16+ to beat me slick.

  • good job, what was the time?

  • that shit was slow as fuck

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more