ok so they're not turned out 180 degrees and their legs don't hit their faces...this does not mean that they have bad technique! part of ballet is being exciting to watch--"tricks" seem to have replaced this prerequisite as of late. who cares if you can do four pirouettes and perfect split leaps if you're an acute bore to watch?
it`s so beautiful and life. I never saw such a beautiful ballet at present. And seriously, they look much more beautiful when they are not too thin just as the present ballerinas
i love the older dancers!!! they really have more passion and movement and life then the dancers today. its sad everyone is so caught up with just technique it feels like. back then their technique wasnt the best but it wasnt bad by any means! they rocked this!
This film is a great representation of British ballet of the mid 20th century. It does not, however, reflect the state of technique everywhere. This film was shot before it became the norm to have alot of cross-fertilization between many different styles, etc.
no it isnt sped up - this is actually the proper way to perform these steps, & the tempi are all correct not only choreographically but muscially as well. This is exactly how the music would have been played at the 1890 premiere. Today dancers are longer, and as such the majorty of thier legs take longer to move.
yes, technique is better now. But the art has suffered as a result. That is why the art of ballet has turned into mathematics, and why people would rather see a person who can perform tricks rather than a true artist. Many young dancers - particularly in the US - know nothing of their art aside from technique... and it shows.
mrlopez, i would just like to say its wonderful that to see your opinion on things, especially due to your extensive knowledge of ballet history. I think its great that you post comments on youtube videos to explain the history of the ballet, variation, music, and so much more. Thank you so much!!
yeahhhh i definatly agree with you. it's like, you go to YAGP and see all of these talented dancers preforming tricks instead of the artform. yeah they can get their leg up and do multiple pirouetts, but it isn't art.
Wow you know the dynamics of ballet today has grown so much! Technique has higher standards. However, I never see smiles like that in today's performances.
if only ballet was done with this much style, performance and dynamics these days! ok the technique is a bit oldfashioned but can't u just see how much they love it!!!! what a treat!!! xxx
That's a great example of style, energy, real technique. Notice how on the beat they were, part of the music? They had more line because they were there on the beat and held that moment so you can see it.
Dancers today are not superior to people of the past. Did you notice how fast her beats were, faster than the film could capture? How much stronger her muscles were, not being all elongated?
great!the artist are Merle Park(diamond), Georgina Parkinson(silver) & Graham Usher(gold)...i don't understand why there isn't the variation of sapphire...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I thought he might be good till the girl came.
The royal ballet had a little problem of the World War 2. Ballet virtually stopped in UK unlike the Paris Opera that was performing all through the German occupation. It took a long time for British ballet to recover. De Valois had to employ many overseas dancers but she employed only British male dancers saying that had had to fight. Virtually no ballet schools and no teachers.
The Royal Ballet was noted for keeping the most authentic version of Petipa's choreography outside of Russia. I was taught this identical choreography years ago by Lorita Travaglia who taught at Ballet Rotaru. She in turn learned it from Russian ballerinas!
Could I please correct you this is not Nureyev's choreography it is Dame Ninette de Valois and Sir Frederick Ashtons. It was revived after the war and performed at the Royal Opera House and the title role of Princess Aurora is Dame Margot Fonteyn.
This is Prince Floreston and his sisters. I think this is Nureyev's choreography? I danced this last year, but the coda was quite different. The solos are the same. Where is Prince Floreston's solo? Haha
omg this ks the song we used for our fairy dance!!! i did it with ballet901ami and dancergirl! as u can tell we r all dancers= =)
missdancer333 2 months ago
its my fairy dance!
ballet901ami 2 months ago in playlist Nutcracker Ballet
That's my variations at my school !
bibicool12341234 6 months ago
Comment removed
theamazingsoter 6 months ago
Comment removed
theamazingsoter 6 months ago
Comment removed
theamazingsoter 8 months ago
The diamond fairy looks like she's dancing the part of the violente. LOL.
danceizmyworld 9 months ago
ooh my goodness i absolutely love this!!!
okay the technique is pretty bad but I mean..they're DANCING!! they're dancers and not only "ballet-roboters"!
thanks for uploading:)!!
danzzeshorty 9 months ago
Comment removed
Chiswick2 11 months ago
Comment removed
Chiswick2 11 months ago
holy. crap. ... so much footwork.....
RawrHA 1 year ago
ok so they're not turned out 180 degrees and their legs don't hit their faces...this does not mean that they have bad technique! part of ballet is being exciting to watch--"tricks" seem to have replaced this prerequisite as of late. who cares if you can do four pirouettes and perfect split leaps if you're an acute bore to watch?
neptunelogic 1 year ago
i really never get tired of this one! :)
littleme889 1 year ago
it`s so beautiful and life. I never saw such a beautiful ballet at present. And seriously, they look much more beautiful when they are not too thin just as the present ballerinas
littleme889 1 year ago 3
i love the older dancers!!! they really have more passion and movement and life then the dancers today. its sad everyone is so caught up with just technique it feels like. back then their technique wasnt the best but it wasnt bad by any means! they rocked this!
akkid34 2 years ago 7
about 1963
numberonefilmfan 2 years ago 2
This film is a great representation of British ballet of the mid 20th century. It does not, however, reflect the state of technique everywhere. This film was shot before it became the norm to have alot of cross-fertilization between many different styles, etc.
mrlopez2681 2 years ago 4
I would so much rather see this kind of dancing - alive, musical, joyous and heartfelt, than good technique and less feeling.
lashenova 2 years ago 4
like around wht year do u guys think this was
1MonM7 2 years ago 2
it looks late 60´s early 70´s to me... maybe more 60´s but thats a really good question.
odile77 2 years ago 2
i agree with you it looks more like 60's
1MonM7 2 years ago
tHEY ARE FABULOUS
FedeeeSylvie 2 years ago
this was fun to watch, I enjoyed it very much.
pukiripu 2 years ago 3
r they just going abnormally fast or is it the recording?
lolitalebron 2 years ago
puah its actually normal time, i think..
they just happen to be amazing X33
frootloops116 2 years ago 2
no it isnt sped up - this is actually the proper way to perform these steps, & the tempi are all correct not only choreographically but muscially as well. This is exactly how the music would have been played at the 1890 premiere. Today dancers are longer, and as such the majorty of thier legs take longer to move.
mrlopez2681 2 years ago 5
Beautiful..
dudalovetendo 3 years ago
yes, technique is better now. But the art has suffered as a result. That is why the art of ballet has turned into mathematics, and why people would rather see a person who can perform tricks rather than a true artist. Many young dancers - particularly in the US - know nothing of their art aside from technique... and it shows.
mrlopez2681 3 years ago 26
mrlopez, i would just like to say its wonderful that to see your opinion on things, especially due to your extensive knowledge of ballet history. I think its great that you post comments on youtube videos to explain the history of the ballet, variation, music, and so much more. Thank you so much!!
mochabubble 3 years ago 5
I definitely agree with you. I as well often see a lack in artistry with the pressured technique.
By the way, Sylphida, Thank you for putting this one up! It is one of my favorite parts of the ballet!
GlassHands 3 years ago 3
yeahhhh i definatly agree with you. it's like, you go to YAGP and see all of these talented dancers preforming tricks instead of the artform. yeah they can get their leg up and do multiple pirouetts, but it isn't art.
xoangie03 3 years ago 2
I think this is so much better than any current dancing I have seen from major international companies.
lashenova 2 years ago 2
yes it's true that this lower body technique would never do today, but look at the upper body presentation and the musicality.
kdub10009 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What the fuck is this?
Eubacterium 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh god turn out please :)))
davidballet 3 years ago
i don't know what your talking about. her feet are complete sickled!
dancerbwoi 3 years ago
Wow you know the dynamics of ballet today has grown so much! Technique has higher standards. However, I never see smiles like that in today's performances.
Uta420 3 years ago 10
merle park and graham usher dont know the other gel!
michaelc1234 3 years ago
I have the dvd - believe the other girl is Georgina Parkinson now ballet mistress at abt.
bluejay602 3 years ago 2
ABSOLUTLEY FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if only ballet was done with this much style, performance and dynamics these days! ok the technique is a bit oldfashioned but can't u just see how much they love it!!!! what a treat!!! xxx
jhay2907 4 years ago 7
yeah i agree!
i've seen more recent versions of 'the jewels' and though they were good, this one for me has the most character and is more fun to watch!
tigereyes5 4 years ago 4
Oh dear. No one could possibly look good doing that choreography that fast.
This is what is normally the first act Pas de Quatre, or in this case a Pas de Trois.
LifeAboveTheClouds 4 years ago
LifeAboveTheClouds
I believe they just did choreography that fast and looked absolutley smashing.
spazzyabbi 2 years ago
Gosh!.. the dancer in the 2nd variation can reli travel! have you noticed ?
xx
nessballerina 4 years ago
That first girl does not seem to be over her box.. Am I right?
mobunict 4 years ago
why dont you try this variation as fast as she did..then we'll see whos "over their box."
these were older times people..not too old, but not recent.
dancergirl221 3 years ago 3
You're right
mobunict 3 years ago
I guess that's why I like adagio better
mobunict 3 years ago
That was beautiful!!!
ariniballetten 4 years ago
That's a great example of style, energy, real technique. Notice how on the beat they were, part of the music? They had more line because they were there on the beat and held that moment so you can see it.
Dancers today are not superior to people of the past. Did you notice how fast her beats were, faster than the film could capture? How much stronger her muscles were, not being all elongated?
SZlatkovsky 4 years ago 4
even though i didnt actually like the way they danced...there better dancers then me and i kno they must hav worked so hard.
strawberrishake 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
turn out....? did anyone see any?? I must have missed it.. still really pretty tutus!!!
Balletlife22 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they don`t stretch their legs!!!!!!!! ahhhhhhhhhhhhh
snapeisinnocent123 4 years ago
does anyone know the name of the variation that the fist girl did?????
katjane89 4 years ago
erm well im learning it at RBS SA's and our teacher told us that it was a jewels solo, if that helps
xx
nessballerina 4 years ago
thanks!
katjane89 4 years ago
no problem bit of a simple answer so hope it helps.. =]
xx
nessballerina 4 years ago
great!the artist are Merle Park(diamond), Georgina Parkinson(silver) & Graham Usher(gold)...i don't understand why there isn't the variation of sapphire...
spinkyangel91 4 years ago 2
I like it! Nice.....
claver07 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I thought he might be good till the girl came.
19Christi70 4 years ago
if he was in the royal ballet,that means he was good!
i think you dont know nothing about ballet darling!
you should have more ballet lessons,than come talk to me..
kisses honey!
bockjunior 4 years ago
They may not have the turn out and body required these days, but the dancing is absolutely incredible and so precise, especially the first lady.
itsjane12345 4 years ago 12
seriously, usually it looks like a mess.
sylphida 4 years ago
The royal ballet had a little problem of the World War 2. Ballet virtually stopped in UK unlike the Paris Opera that was performing all through the German occupation. It took a long time for British ballet to recover. De Valois had to employ many overseas dancers but she employed only British male dancers saying that had had to fight. Virtually no ballet schools and no teachers.
JanetteHeffernan 4 years ago
The Royal Ballet was noted for keeping the most authentic version of Petipa's choreography outside of Russia. I was taught this identical choreography years ago by Lorita Travaglia who taught at Ballet Rotaru. She in turn learned it from Russian ballerinas!
smyrnaballet 4 years ago
Could I please correct you this is not Nureyev's choreography it is Dame Ninette de Valois and Sir Frederick Ashtons. It was revived after the war and performed at the Royal Opera House and the title role of Princess Aurora is Dame Margot Fonteyn.
1992dwhitbrook 4 years ago
i reeeeeeally don't like that tutu in the beginning!
ninalovescake 4 years ago
This is Prince Floreston and his sisters. I think this is Nureyev's choreography? I danced this last year, but the coda was quite different. The solos are the same. Where is Prince Floreston's solo? Haha
urgh87 4 years ago
must be Irina torpakova, a great ballet dancer from Russia.
queroessevideo 4 years ago
this is an old video. I think the two ballerinas might be Georgina Parkinson and Merle Park. It's from the royal ballet anyway.
jairocortes 4 years ago
well, seems like there are many problems ~~ looks weirdo...
mvking 4 years ago
could you be more specific?
sylphida 4 years ago
I mean they did the steps really quick, like fast forwarded~~~ and I think they kinda look like dolls!
mvking 4 years ago
oo! i see whats sorta wierd!! their feet arnt very pointed like their shoes arent broken in or something....
mimiplusanime 4 years ago
i guess they hadn't discovered turnout yet...
Fattyshack 4 years ago
woah! it looks like its been put on fast forward!
mimiplusanime 4 years ago
lol
bluefrafra 4 years ago
The dancers in order of appearance are Georgina Parkinson, Merle Park and Graham Usher.
Rysanekfan 4 years ago 2
thanks :)
sylphida 4 years ago
Absolutely correct!
JanetteHeffernan 4 years ago
wat year is this from???
hensster 4 years ago
1963
Rysanekfan 4 years ago
Could it be Elizabeth Anderton and Merle Park? Who is the man?
katerinavander 4 years ago
I absolutely adore how she actually looks like she's having fun out there! Yay!
ballerinawannabe1991 4 years ago 2
where is the turnout?
dancingkutee101 4 years ago
perhaps the first was lynn seymour? i'm not sure though
littlefairyballerina 4 years ago
hehe
jpmraaa 4 years ago