Es imposible interpretar esta obra de arte mejor,se unen dos genios ¡Scriabin y Rischter ! Exquisita sonoridad de la mano de un feroz y autentico virtuosismo casi extinto en nuestros dias o bien en peligro de extincion.
@FilipBirve the top register. It's because he forces occasionally (in the FF's) and the piano cant quite cope and goes out of tune. It gets worse as the piece progresses. It often happens with Horowitz also.
Fantastic interpretation as usual from the great Richter, but I'd have to go to Kocyan for this piece. The latter captures the impressionistic mood far better.
As a Scriabin-playing pianist, I really appreciate the extra time and effort you put into posting the corresponding sheet music for this piece in the video. Not only is this one of the best recordings of one of (in my opinion) the greatest pieces written for solo piano in the last 100 years, the music allows me to analyze the piece as it's being played and judge its difficulty and interpretation. Thanks a lot.
Hello, mursum151, I like your comment, thank you for correcting me, I was just trying to help violinistx100. In fact you are be right, but, helás, Debussy was influenced by Wagner (Demoiselle Élue, Rodrigue et Chimene for example). Who wasn't, by the way? Sibelius? But Scriabin's colour approach and language he used specially after his fourth sonata are based in French not German. That caused my distraction.
Scriabin said of himself: I used to be a Chopinian, then a Debussynian and then Scriabinian. We just imagine where he could reach had him lived more than his 43 years.
Your quote of Scriabin's statement is partly wrong. According to Arthur Rubinstein, to whom that statement was directed at in a private discussion, the influence after Chopin was Wagner, not Debussy. I have never observed any traces of Debussy's influence on Scriabin's music either.
@mursum151 What about the 2nd movement of this Sonata? In the middle of it there's a part that very much reminds me of Debussy's "Jardins sous la pluie".
@titusbeertsen to me that similarity sounds a pretty vague one. Based on a short passage (I'm not even sure which one) it is hard to draw any lines between these two composers. And yet Scriabin finished his 2nd sonata some 6 years before debussy composed "estampes" :>
@mursum151 I'd disagree. Both composers were heavily influenced by the French symbolist poets. While Debussy probably had no direct influence on Scriabin's work, both composers had very similar musical tendencies and their musical philosophies weren't far removed from each other.
Scriabin's Promethean scale is simply the whole tone scale with one of the pitches altered by a half step. They used similar harmonic languages and similar rhythmic figures. They're not as different as you may think.
@Gargantupimp Not sure why you're getting defensive. I absolutey adore Scriabin. He's easily my favorite composer. But the similarities between the works of the two are pretty strong, and as I stated, they both aligned themselves with the artistic philosophies and principles of the Symbolist movement, so whether or not one inspired the other is not important, what's important is that they were both aiming for similar artistic goals.
He was a russian composer from the beggining of the XX century, and in his later works he walked a different way from his contemporaries. He had several atonal passages, but his way was very personal, because he introduces chords over fours, and different develops in the matter of form, like a mosaic form, but very different from debussy. He also had sinestesia, a "dissease" that makes you see colours when you hear music. I suggest that you listen "promenade" for orchestra.
@Pianoplayer002 Sofronitsky is great at this, that particular development in his hands sounds like someone shooting flak cannons into the cloudy night, just cool in everyway.
It's amazing that Scriabin could be prolific as a Romantic and an Avante Garde composer also. Just on those grounds, you can label him as unbelievable. This really is a great piece. And the best part of it is, I don't really have an opinion on who interprets this best; I'm really caught between Richter and Sofrinitsky.
i dont know if i am weird-sounding, but this peice makes me feel in love, walking by the sea with the moon playing on the water softly- a night to remember and cherish. It gives me the chills completely
you sound quite normal to me...i know what you mean about the chills..it's very wuthering heights like...like a grand poetic tragedy...remembering lost love ones...the sea watching ect.
wow Scriabin's music is incredible. It's as if he's playing tetris with notes.
Rather than structure and harmony, Scriabin creates stories using infinate textures and forms, by complete mastery of an endless stream of notes of different shapes and power.
Truly an epic story, and for me what would represent some of the most fascinating and virtuosic creations.
I cant believe how hard to play Scriabin can be!, I found it a lot heavier than many works of Liszt and Rachmaninoff, and the rythmic structure its amazing...thanks god for Scriabin!
"But Throughout his lifetime Rachmaninoff had many doubts about his compositional style and he was intimidated by the 'modern' composers, such as Scriabin. Scriabin liked Rachmaninoff as a person but he thought that his music was too 'cheezy', too romantic for his tastes." Interesting. Although I have a hard time believing that.
was scriabin aware of Debussie's piano music when he wrote this sonata?or the other way round?i've never heard scriabin sound so 'impressionistic',fine sonata but played supremely well,many thanks
im not quite sure if thats an insult :P but i know they both had the same teacher and knew eachother, as far as i know they were friends, correct me if im wrong pls =)
when Scriabin died Rachmaninoff dedicated an entire concert if not an entire tour to only playing Scriabin music. his fans asked him to play his own, but he refused only playing the music of Scriabin.. I would say, if he respected Scriabin so much, I doubt Scriabin hated and insulter Rachmaninoff's music.
My teacher studied at the Moscow Conservatory for 8 years and she did her doctorate on Rachmaninoff's musical upbringing. These are all stories she found out while doing her research. Rachmaninoff and Scriabin were good friends. But Throughout his lifetime Rachmaninoff had many doubts about his compositional style and he was intimidated by the 'modern' composers, such as Scriabin. Scriabin liked Rachmaninoff as a person but he thought that his music was too 'cheezy', too romantic for his tastes.
Unsurpassable....I cannot find the words to describe it...this is the most beautiful Scriabin I have ever heard, with the possible except of Sofronitsky's...the effortlessness with which Richter achieves all of this...seeing the score adds an interesting dimension
You just have to listen to it once and you will love it. You can feel the magic in every single note played so beautifully by Sviatoslav Richter. Scriabin really was a unbelievably talented composer!
I don't know if i'd ever use the word talent for such a beautiful thing. You can watch a 12 year old play something like this, and it wouldn't mean a thing to him. He'd profoundly enjoy it, but it won't mean as much to him. This sort of composing is love. It's the most effective form of communication.
pairing the sheet music with the piece itself is a tremendous help and a great convenience. i know it must be a great deal of work, but i for one truly appreciate your efforts.
yes, and Scriabin had special place for this sonata in his heart. He worked on it much longer.... Check out Sofronitsky performance too. Both Richter and Sofronitsky are unsurassed in Scriabin... and also - another great Scriabin performer - Alexandr Iocheles. Not well known outside of Russia.
This has been flagged as spam show
music like this doesn't even seem hard to write
purplehaze216 4 days ago
Comment removed
purplehaze216 4 days ago
very different from his first sonata
UrbanVivaldi 1 month ago
@cocoonfabula no no, 0:00 -> 7:31 is the best part hands down! :D
119Nausiem911 1 month ago
It is very beautiful.
Melody from 6:32 is especially beautiful.
Shige85Allen 1 month ago
Richter does a wonderful job interpreting this piece. The closing reminds me of Debussy's Arabesque No. 1 in the way it flows.
thejeffmorrison 4 months ago
Es imposible interpretar esta obra de arte mejor,se unen dos genios ¡Scriabin y Rischter ! Exquisita sonoridad de la mano de un feroz y autentico virtuosismo casi extinto en nuestros dias o bien en peligro de extincion.
luargambino 4 months ago
good i like i an twgirl taiwan 謝謝 我的 you tube 是 twgirl1 請大家來欣賞
twgirl1 6 months ago
such a shame the piano is so out of tune!
newgeorge 8 months ago
@newgeorge Doesn't sound out of tune to me.
FilipBirve 7 months ago
@FilipBirve the top register. It's because he forces occasionally (in the FF's) and the piano cant quite cope and goes out of tune. It gets worse as the piece progresses. It often happens with Horowitz also.
newgeorge 7 months ago
i hope i can play this one day
ArtsDesignJU 9 months ago
@ArtsDesignJU keep working at it and it's one of the most gratifying pieces you can play!
yingnay000 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is how enlightenment sounds like. Nothing more to say.
IvanNarutoU 9 months ago
Comment removed
IvanNarutoU 9 months ago
This song is much more difficult to play than it sounds.
MertezAad 10 months ago 3
excellent
concertviolinist 11 months ago
worst part 7:31
vaseintibet 11 months ago 4
there's an almost angry quality in Richter's playing but I love this performance.
I've heard all ten sonatas in one concert- -wow,what an event that was!
allegramente5000 1 year ago
@allegramente5000 Wow, who did that and where? That would've been awesome to attend, an all-Scriabin recital!
titusbeertsen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richter is great of course, but I also very much recommend HAMELIN.
tweriovnzxclb 1 year ago
Richter is great of course, but I also very much recommend HAMELIN.
tweriovnzxclb 1 year ago
Fantastic interpretation as usual from the great Richter, but I'd have to go to Kocyan for this piece. The latter captures the impressionistic mood far better.
BrackenClelk 1 year ago
Gorgeous! So wonderful to follow along with the sheet music! Thanks for posting.
JanisRaderPiano 1 year ago
Thank you very much Pianoplayer002 for this beautiful moment of art
marmasiotis 1 year ago
Great work with the score and how about the performance... Fantastic!!
douskara 1 year ago
No, the best part is 0:0-7:31
runescapeRP 1 year ago 5
As a Scriabin-playing pianist, I really appreciate the extra time and effort you put into posting the corresponding sheet music for this piece in the video. Not only is this one of the best recordings of one of (in my opinion) the greatest pieces written for solo piano in the last 100 years, the music allows me to analyze the piece as it's being played and judge its difficulty and interpretation. Thanks a lot.
savethetrees433 1 year ago
beautiful music :)
Rainelfy 1 year ago
Near the end of the song, it sounds like a river.
lllllllllll1llllllll 1 year ago
Hello, mursum151, I like your comment, thank you for correcting me, I was just trying to help violinistx100. In fact you are be right, but, helás, Debussy was influenced by Wagner (Demoiselle Élue, Rodrigue et Chimene for example). Who wasn't, by the way? Sibelius? But Scriabin's colour approach and language he used specially after his fourth sonata are based in French not German. That caused my distraction.
araujomateus 2 years ago
Can someone explain to me who Scriabin is? I've just found him.
violinistx100 2 years ago
Scriabin said of himself: I used to be a Chopinian, then a Debussynian and then Scriabinian. We just imagine where he could reach had him lived more than his 43 years.
araujomateus 2 years ago 3
@araujomateus
Exactly the same here- although I think the melancholic stylings of Beethoven might've been thrown in the mix in between Chopin and Debussy for me?
cmartmozzy 2 years ago
Your quote of Scriabin's statement is partly wrong. According to Arthur Rubinstein, to whom that statement was directed at in a private discussion, the influence after Chopin was Wagner, not Debussy. I have never observed any traces of Debussy's influence on Scriabin's music either.
mursum151 2 years ago
@mursum151 What about the 2nd movement of this Sonata? In the middle of it there's a part that very much reminds me of Debussy's "Jardins sous la pluie".
titusbeertsen 1 year ago
@titusbeertsen to me that similarity sounds a pretty vague one. Based on a short passage (I'm not even sure which one) it is hard to draw any lines between these two composers. And yet Scriabin finished his 2nd sonata some 6 years before debussy composed "estampes" :>
mursum151 1 year ago
@mursum151 I'd disagree. Both composers were heavily influenced by the French symbolist poets. While Debussy probably had no direct influence on Scriabin's work, both composers had very similar musical tendencies and their musical philosophies weren't far removed from each other.
Scriabin's Promethean scale is simply the whole tone scale with one of the pitches altered by a half step. They used similar harmonic languages and similar rhythmic figures. They're not as different as you may think.
MJTTOMB 1 year ago
@MJTTOMB Scriabin rapes Debussy in the pooper until sunrise
Gargantupimp 1 year ago
@MJTTOMB And that's my artistic opinion, you don't have to agree with what I say but you should defend to the death my right to say it
Gargantupimp 1 year ago
@Gargantupimp Not sure why you're getting defensive. I absolutey adore Scriabin. He's easily my favorite composer. But the similarities between the works of the two are pretty strong, and as I stated, they both aligned themselves with the artistic philosophies and principles of the Symbolist movement, so whether or not one inspired the other is not important, what's important is that they were both aiming for similar artistic goals.
MJTTOMB 1 year ago
@MJTTOMB Aye they do contain some similarities, but I don't know if I wuld say their artistic philosophies were aligned, can you give me a example
Gargantupimp 1 year ago
He was a russian composer from the beggining of the XX century, and in his later works he walked a different way from his contemporaries. He had several atonal passages, but his way was very personal, because he introduces chords over fours, and different develops in the matter of form, like a mosaic form, but very different from debussy. He also had sinestesia, a "dissease" that makes you see colours when you hear music. I suggest that you listen "promenade" for orchestra.
hexatonico 2 years ago
3:38 -> 3:42 best part !!
COCOONFABULA 2 years ago
Actually the entire development section (3:21-4:40) in this interpretation is one of my favourite parts of any piece, ever.
Pianoplayer002 2 years ago 4
The whole piece is actually amazing ^^ Like the left hand in the measures 8-9-10... omg !
COCOONFABULA 2 years ago
@Pianoplayer002 Sofronitsky is great at this, that particular development in his hands sounds like someone shooting flak cannons into the cloudy night, just cool in everyway.
Gargantupimp 1 year ago
@COCOONFABULA No my friend. 0:00 - 7:31 is the best part!
Vesivian 9 months ago
@Vesivian hehe indeed you're right :)
COCOONFABULA 9 months ago
It's amazing that Scriabin could be prolific as a Romantic and an Avante Garde composer also. Just on those grounds, you can label him as unbelievable. This really is a great piece. And the best part of it is, I don't really have an opinion on who interprets this best; I'm really caught between Richter and Sofrinitsky.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 6
This composition is why Scriabin is my favourite composer!
Rachmanomaniac 2 years ago 5
esp harmony at 3:24
skryabyn 2 years ago 2
i dont know if i am weird-sounding, but this peice makes me feel in love, walking by the sea with the moon playing on the water softly- a night to remember and cherish. It gives me the chills completely
skryabyn 2 years ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
@skryabyn yeah your weird as shit
baseket2ball12 2 years ago
you sound quite normal to me...i know what you mean about the chills..it's very wuthering heights like...like a grand poetic tragedy...remembering lost love ones...the sea watching ect.
johnnynoirman 2 years ago
mmm... wuthering heights; great comparison
skryabyn 2 years ago
thanks.
johnnynoirman 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wolftone77 2 years ago
i`m preparing this sonata for my last year of highschool...it`s pretty hard but it`s stunning!
bohusbogdan 2 years ago
Nice! I'm preparing for his op 8 no 12 for senior year, last year... Haha
Und1ne 2 years ago
Is it just me, or are there strong elements of Wagner in this piece? There certainly are in Scriabin's First Symphony.
gnolti 2 years ago
Scriabin was a big fan of Wagner, Chopin, Tchaikovsky, Brahms, and Beethoven. So he certainly learned from some of the best orchestrators.
Lukecash12 2 years ago
wow Scriabin's music is incredible. It's as if he's playing tetris with notes.
Rather than structure and harmony, Scriabin creates stories using infinate textures and forms, by complete mastery of an endless stream of notes of different shapes and power.
Truly an epic story, and for me what would represent some of the most fascinating and virtuosic creations.
tarquin161234 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
Sissco 2 years ago
the tetris one was the best description of Scriabin's music I have ever heard!! :D:D
HelveteKeiser 2 years ago 2
truley masterpiece..............
richter plays this sonata with a beatifull cololors and with internal emmotion!
THE BEST RECORDING OF SONATA........
kempff95 2 years ago 2
an incredible masterpiece
lucamadeus 2 years ago
this is simply beutiful :)
Aza1408 2 years ago 3
I cant believe how hard to play Scriabin can be!, I found it a lot heavier than many works of Liszt and Rachmaninoff, and the rythmic structure its amazing...thanks god for Scriabin!
visionfugitiva 2 years ago 7
Exquisite!
nnrit 2 years ago 3
"But Throughout his lifetime Rachmaninoff had many doubts about his compositional style and he was intimidated by the 'modern' composers, such as Scriabin. Scriabin liked Rachmaninoff as a person but he thought that his music was too 'cheezy', too romantic for his tastes." Interesting. Although I have a hard time believing that.
tweriovnzxclb 2 years ago
Richter is best. Perfect union of technique and emotions!!
vincecharus 2 years ago 2
love this piece!!
wateva2234 2 years ago 2
was scriabin aware of Debussie's piano music when he wrote this sonata?or the other way round?i've never heard scriabin sound so 'impressionistic',fine sonata but played supremely well,many thanks
Dumplingmaster 2 years ago 4
Oh, I think nothing to do with Debussy here... The aim of Scriabin's harmonics is other I guess
BubbaFrench 2 years ago
he is amazing genious.....
fanofmus 2 years ago 2
This movement is like equivalent to Rachmaninoff's prelude op32 no.10 in B minor I think.
Both have that sad-yet beautiful sound.
Kalen1457 3 years ago 2
I see what you mean... but I still prefer this piece
BTW, Scriabin hated Rachmaninoff's music! He insulted his music by calling it "boiled ham" (I know, weird... must be some russian thing).
pureaKero 3 years ago
im not quite sure if thats an insult :P but i know they both had the same teacher and knew eachother, as far as i know they were friends, correct me if im wrong pls =)
Chopinco 2 years ago
when Scriabin died Rachmaninoff dedicated an entire concert if not an entire tour to only playing Scriabin music. his fans asked him to play his own, but he refused only playing the music of Scriabin.. I would say, if he respected Scriabin so much, I doubt Scriabin hated and insulter Rachmaninoff's music.
davidbaker03 2 years ago
My teacher studied at the Moscow Conservatory for 8 years and she did her doctorate on Rachmaninoff's musical upbringing. These are all stories she found out while doing her research. Rachmaninoff and Scriabin were good friends. But Throughout his lifetime Rachmaninoff had many doubts about his compositional style and he was intimidated by the 'modern' composers, such as Scriabin. Scriabin liked Rachmaninoff as a person but he thought that his music was too 'cheezy', too romantic for his tastes.
pureaKero 2 years ago
It's beautiful! I'd love to play like that!
PropertyOfKish 3 years ago
Unsurpassable....I cannot find the words to describe it...this is the most beautiful Scriabin I have ever heard, with the possible except of Sofronitsky's...the effortlessness with which Richter achieves all of this...seeing the score adds an interesting dimension
soami2u 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
It just doesn't hold my attention i think op 42 no5 and op8 no11 are more beautiful.
123eldest 3 years ago
ha, i can't believe i'm number 15,000... love this piece...
Lukecash12 3 years ago
very emotional...
Lukecash12 3 years ago 6
i cried.
Lukecash12 3 years ago 8
He played very good , that's all !
aryanpianist 3 years ago 15
You just have to listen to it once and you will love it. You can feel the magic in every single note played so beautifully by Sviatoslav Richter. Scriabin really was a unbelievably talented composer!
churchlandsmuso4life 3 years ago 28
I don't know if i'd ever use the word talent for such a beautiful thing. You can watch a 12 year old play something like this, and it wouldn't mean a thing to him. He'd profoundly enjoy it, but it won't mean as much to him. This sort of composing is love. It's the most effective form of communication.
Lukecash12 3 years ago 6
you have to be matured & have lived a lot to be a performer of genious
jewish1972 3 years ago 8
Got nothing to say more than : it's pure, celeste, and magnific.... My favourite Sonata...
agt200 3 years ago 20
I love how you match up with the sheet music
Alessandro1985 3 years ago 13
love it..
ezgi88igze 3 years ago 13
increible. Sin palabras
Yanira707 3 years ago 12
pairing the sheet music with the piece itself is a tremendous help and a great convenience. i know it must be a great deal of work, but i for one truly appreciate your efforts.
elmauro 4 years ago 12
idem
suzettegm 4 years ago
Thank you sooo much for posting this!
This is just wonderful...
KogumaMischa 4 years ago 4
thankyo 4 this
chad410 4 years ago
Wunderfull
FranzLiszt 4 years ago
Be sure to check out the second movement as well ;)
Pianoplayer002 4 years ago
WONDERFUL!! And THANK YOU for posting the sheet music too!
bckm54 4 years ago 5
I'm glad you appreciate it :) It can be quite tedious to cut down all those pages to 2-3 systems at a time, and then put it together with the music^^
Pianoplayer002 4 years ago 3
@Pianoplayer002 by hand??
Kidding.
efanwoo 6 months ago
one of the most beautiful music ever written
rachm06 4 years ago 6
yes, and Scriabin had special place for this sonata in his heart. He worked on it much longer.... Check out Sofronitsky performance too. Both Richter and Sofronitsky are unsurassed in Scriabin... and also - another great Scriabin performer - Alexandr Iocheles. Not well known outside of Russia.
truecrypt 4 years ago 6
the most beautiful scriabin i have heard
asdfggbby 4 years ago