LOL. God, I would be so torn. It would definetly come down to picking through each of those candidates with a fine tooth comb to make such a descision. Better yet... a Paul/Kucinich ticket.
Just stand up & BE Counted! ReOPEN 911 & doIT Right-no stone unturned. Sign Impeachment & go4 Treason/ Prosecution next on all who would turn this country into a Fascist State. Rise out of your Couch & Get ACTIVE! BlackWater is in CALifornia,Illnois & Texas-the brown troopers R at the gates. HR1955 Radicalism & HomeGrown Terrorism HERE! Do No Harm - BUSH can Call Marshall LAW At AnyTIME!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well i listen to people with answers...which happens to be them. All the conspirists do is ask qeustions lyk why and how come? They do the work of 5th graders. Any1 can link a couple of coincidences together and make a conspiracy theory. The people who desserve to be lsitened to are the 1s with the answers. In this case the history channel
First off, and I try to avoid name calling on the internet, you are an idiot. The history channel certainly is not the all authoritative bringer of truth. Secondly questions like why and how come are the most important in an investigation. Third the so-called experts on the History Channel were magazine journalists. Lastly, coincidences usually are not coincidences, when they are they are usually called phenomenons.
I notice you hijacker theorists like to try and dismiss government involvement by focusing on motivation. That's the wrong place to focus. If the towers were brought down by demolitions, the US govt. did it. I don't need to explain why they did it. If science shows the buildings could not collapse like that without demolitions, it's an inside job whether we understand the motives or not.
ah....science has shown that it can be done with dozens of simulations. everyone says the fire couldnt hear steal up enough to burn it. but it could heat it up enough to bend it and that is all that is needed for it to no longer be able to hold up the undreds of thousands of pounds above.
You are speaking absolute rubbish. Even if all seven floors that was on fire COMPLETELY vanished, the top section would hit the bottom section and topple over. Its a very basic law of physics called the law of conservation of momentum.
nope. not if u study how the buidldings were build. the architect who designed it made sure that if there was a fire/explosion which would cause a collapse....that it would fall striaght down to avoid collateral damage. do some research before you question the u.s. government!
no. you do some basic research like reading or watching anything by david ray griffin or architect richard gage and you too can see the official story as not only a fraud, but a transparent fraud. the architect in fact designed the bldgs to withstand the force of a lg passenger jet and stronger, like a level 5 hurricane. plus there's all the eyewitness testimony, the war games, the put options,bush/bin laden ties, able danger,pnac, the destruction of air traffic controller testimonies...
if the reason the towers started to collapse was due to fire weakening the steel, it is still absolutely impossible to explain how all three buildings collapsed with a sudden onset. One second they are standing, the next they are falling.
When steel melts it bends and sags. There should have been beams bending, floors sagging, gurders twisting, but there is no evidence of this AT ALL.
That is why hundreds of engineers are now campaigning for a new investigation.
Actually, Means, Motive and Opportunity are good places to focus if there's lack of direct evidence.
Also the circumstances before, during and after the crime are good places to focus.
Ie, many of the "changes" cited as a response to 9/11 did in fact take place before 9/11: plan to invade Iraq, plan to divide Iraq's oil among US/western oil corporations, plan for privatization in Iraq, negotiations with US Telcos to enable warrentless wiretapping on US citizens.
Thank you rspawn, you are right. I obviousily failed in this instance and using names is exactly what Popular Mechanics, "the experts" did when attempting to sway opinion in favor of themselves and the official story versus "too much time on their hands" "Get a job" "theorists" on the history channel. It was an off day when I said that. Instead of writing what I did, I should of just spoke my peace and avoided the name calling. I hurt my argument by doing so. Thank you.
Yes, History Channel is corporate owned and Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation..wouldn't they want the corporate agenda believed? Your whole gov't is also corporate owned and controlled.
The 911 Commission did not investigate why building 7 fell on that day. It was not hit by a plane. Buildings on both sides of it were fine and still stand today, yet Building 7 (47 stories) fell in a few seconds like a controlled demolition. Didn't the commission think that was worth investigating?
There is one paradigm shift that has to happen in terms of the way the so-called truth movement asserts, validates, and defends, its' positions and objectives. Here it is: It is not the truth movement's job to prove a damn thing, it is the government's job to prove to a convincing degree it did not orchestrate 9/11, and that it is not covering up facts about 9/11.
P.S. We don't need theories, we've got facts demanding we ask the unanswered questions. What melted all that steel? What caused the collapse of building 7? Why is any evidence, including eye-witness testimony, in support of controlled demolition omitted from the official reports?
I fully support a new investigation, as whether people want to admit it or not, the government DID have some kind of helping hand in the attacks, however it would wise to present yourself as a person in support of a new investigation to answer questions rather than present yourself as someone forcing the idea that the government carried it out.
I think everyone can agree there's more to 9/11 than the government is willing to release/admit, truther or not. It just makes it harder to call for a new investigation when you start meddling with ones who would like to pin all the blame on one organization or country. If there really is never a new investigation, I don't think it's time to theorize, I think it's time to take up arms.
I've seen this sentiment widely expressed, and yours is maybe the highest voted comment I've seen on the tube since the voting went in. I love it! It really gives me hope for this country!
You can't prosecute and expose the truth just by a lot of shouting. Kucinich is in Congress and has the power, opportunity, courage, and integrity to legally investigate 9-11, which he has pledged to do. I think it's brilliant to go for financial holes in the story, because financial matters tend to leave a paper trail. The man knows what he's doing. Let's support his forthcoming investigation and may the truth be exposed for all.
I'm not impressed. Great effort. It's something for sure. But I think he skillfully avoided addressing 9/11 as an inside job. And he knows damn well people are talking about that. He needed to be pressed on this issue. That there are many people that believe that 9/11 was an inside job and want an investigation specifically addressing this point. We have to back them into corner on this very point or they will find a way to weasel out of it.
Hey, he is doing something! That's a whole lot more then a certain favorite son candidate. On top of that the 9/11 Press for Truth team is trying to mobilize people to send their congresspeople "Press for Truth" packs so they can get behind this. Just because it is not talked about by AJ does not mean it is not happening.
yer stupid... don't you know how bad he would lose if he came out and said that? He'd be villified. He's smart enough to be vauge so he can get nominated. duh
Are you an idiot? That's political suicide given our corrupt MSM! Ron Paul flat out denied that he thought it was 'perpetrated by our government', but he's still my favorite candidate, because he *would* have it investigated (let the facts speak for themselves) unlike everyone else but kucinich (my 2nd fav).
Yeah, I think some are so anxious to get the whole truth movement thing going that they neglect the impact it would have on Ron Paul's campaign had he just flat out said the government position he's running for had a helping hand in the attacks. Even if it's true, it would surely be the end of his presidential run.
Since when did calling for a new investigation require you to believe 9/11 was an inside job? It would be ignorant to believe the US didn't have a helping hand in 9/11, but it would be even more ignorant to just flat out say the government position you're running for carried out the attacks.
I'm sure an honest investigation will prove once and for all it was an inside job. Then I will kindly tell Ron Paul to go fuck himself for dragging his feet when the families who lost their loved ones needed support. They, these families, are crying for a new investigation. It was an inside job. Who covered it up?
I sure hope he is careful (knowing what happened to JFK) We NEED this man to become president! He already had a hit put on him before, go watch it in my favorite videos.
I mean the terrorists flew the planes. But honestly a lot of 9/11 doesn't make sense. And because of that, half of the 9/11 victims believe there is a conspiracy. Half, not 25%, not 10%, but 50%, a significant number. Even the co-chairs of the 9/11 commission admit it was effed up (they don't believe there was a conspiracy).
lol.. and where is your source? Show me a scientific poll that says this not some college student asking misleading questions to people to fake a poll. I mean if 50% believe this... why have i yet to meet someone who does? Btw internet polls aren't accurate... Since they do not get a broad range of people. If you go to loosechange website and do a poll how is it gonna turn out every time?
Excuse you sir, but I do not understand what you are talking about. I never mentioned loose change or talked about an internet poll. I did however mention the co-chairs of whom you do not mention, nor do you mention the commission's testimony of the israeli-palestinian problem. I cannot find the poll but Zogby International does say half of new yorkers believe the u.s gov't had foreknowledge of which you can search for yourself. Don't attack me for no reason.
maybe they did have an idea that something was gonna happen maybe they didnt... who knows.. but the conspiracy nut jobs use youtube to try to push false info all the time.. what was known is far differant then putting bombs in the world trade center and blowing it up.. the thing doesn't even look like a demolition.. where are all the squibs? why are the explosions of dust comeing from the top insteed of the bottom?
are you retarded? have you ever watched the videos of the towers collapsing? there's squibs popping out all over the place, 20-30 floors below the collapse wave.
Firefighters and construction workers said they saw molten steel beneath all three WTC buildings, and that it looked like controlled demolition. It was still molten weeks later. Energy, like matter, is neither created nor destroyed, it merely changes form. Hiding it is a lot harder than proving it.
I just wish the passenger lists contained the terrorists but they don't. And what's the deal with Usama? This president doesn't really care as evidenced by a recorded segment of CNN. wtf this guy flew planes with bombs into the towers and we don't care? geez
Thats funny... Since phone calls from the plane actually say they were on the plane and stabbing people. Phone calls that came from "air phones" not celphones (another lie in your video).. I've used an air phone before.. they work. Also saying a person would never use his full name when talking to his mom.. guess what. his mom said he did it all the time
What do the phone calls have to do with the passenger lists? It seems to me that you haven't watched loose change or any of those other movies, but you want to insult people who watched the films so that they will believe what you believe. That won't work. The films raised some questions which noone seems to want to answer, so just watch the films, then come up with logical answers for each of the questions raised, and then people will gladly listen to you.
no bodies were recovered from ANY of the plane crashes. no bodies were found at the pentagon nor in PA. look at the evidence watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, loose change, 911 in plane site, terror storm, money masters <-- in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
But remains were found.. Look up f4 phantom vs wall on youtube..
Funny didn't your video say that a plane wouldn't vaporize hitting a wall?... odd... i mean are my eye controled by the goverment to make me see things now?
sifting thru rubble? they shipped all that 'rubble' to China right away to destroy evidence, and u think that while removing that rubble they would not have found all the bodies? that's the point, there were no bodies, the bodies were exploded into tiny fragments and spread over 75 acres. sick
Watch footage of the twin towers, it's obvious they're EXPLODING into dust, NOT COLLAPSING, 1100 bodies were NEVER recovered. WHAT?! How could that be? They were sent into that cloud of dust by EXPLOSIVES. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- witnesses told reporters that BOMBS were going off INSIDE the towers. PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
No where in the movie did it say 1100 bodies were never recovered... Just like a nut case.. makeing stuff up. Now some bodies weren't recovered in the plane crashes.. but that is differant. Also dust is your proof? LOL..
btw not saying bodies weren't found just saying you have no source for your info.. because 1361 was the number.. But being such a well informed person you knew that right?
And they are still finding body parts till this day. Many more of those 1361 reported days after 911 have infact been found. But shifting through 1000s of tons of ruble (yes rubble not "dust"..) Is like finding a needle in a hay stack. Its sad really
Why all the comments about demolition? This was the first news that a hearing would be held in the Congress in September about financial issues in 9/11. Three years after the 9/11 Commission's 'final report' was delivered? That is big news, ladies and gentlemen.
Sounds like you are talking about your own comments. 911 mysteries uses indisputable science to PROVE that the towers were brought down with explosives planted in the building. A highly sophisticated controlled demolition. An inside job. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <--
The fact that you can't even admit that its not a documentary proves your a nut case that can't be reasoned with. I've watched the films.. and it can be disputed. Matter of fact many things in the film are very much lies. The definition i gave you is text book.. i didn't even write it i copied and pasted. Are you saying that personal feelings did not go into these movies?
I read a report called Screw Screw Loose Change and it seems to actually screw the Screw Loose Change report. If you watch the archived news, officials did report bombs. Anyway, at the 9/11 commission hearings though, it was admitted they attacked us because of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict whereas Bush on the other hand tells us its about our Freedoms. Is it no wonder people want he and cheney impeached.
sites? what sites? OH! you mean the documentaries that have been uploaded onto YouTube and Google Video! OH! LOL You had me confused, sorry, because u said sites. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <--
Documentary- objective: emphasizing or expressing things as perceived without distortion of personal feelings, insertion of fictional matter, or interpretation; "objective art"
These movies are not documentries. They clearly have a bias. Even you have to admit that. They are very light on proof and EVERYTHING in it can be countered with someone with true knowledge of buildings. Where are the engineers in the film? A janitor? New reports? Yes they know it all
Watch footage of the twin towers, it's obvious they are EXPLODING into dust, NOT COLLAPSING, 1100 bodies were NEVER recovered. WHAT?! How could that be? They were sent into that cloud of dust by EXPLOSIVES. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- witnesses told reporters that BOMBS were going off INSIDE the towers. in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
And also.. Umm what do you think was in the Aircraft makeing it fly? Water? Ever watch the video of the Aircraft hitting the building? Did you notice that when it hit IT EXPLODED.
Jet fuel just cant melt steel; otherwise, every plane would fall from the sky. Did u see burning people at the top of the towers? See glowing hot steel beams? See a raging inferno? Or a lot of black smoke, like an oxygen starved fire? Look at the evidence. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- Molten steel was still there SIX WEEKS LATER, question the official story, tell others
Ohhh so to weaken steel it must be molten? And no molten METAL was there.. Other metals are used in buildings that melt at much lower degrees. To weaken a metal you need a fraction of the heat. (i work with welding every day.. To bend steel you do not need to melt it and to even suggest you do is stupid)
So.. basicly all the sites you have listed put down the argument of.. omg it doesn't melt at the same degrees of jet fuel! Must be a bomb... WHy? Cause they prey on people like you being ignorant of the fact that yes.. it does not melt.. but being weakened adn then haveing 100s of tons of weight on it means.. down goes the building
Firefighters say they saw molten steel flowing like lava. I tend to believe the firefighters. Building 7 collapsed in 6.6 seconds, all 47 stories straight down, not like the twin towers. It wasn't hit by a plane and molten steel was found beneath it weeks later. To deny these facts is exactly what the 9/11 commission did. Cover up with intent, thus inside job.
Kucinich is smart not to invoke conspiracy theories, but to say what we all know - the Bush administration and congress obstructed justice by refusing to conduct serious and extensive investigations in a timely manner with all parties accountable for their actions or lack thereof. How can you have an investigation that states outright that it will not assign blame for fear of hurting people's feelings. That is not right.
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist More videos from operatorkos
BIN Laden??/ You Mean TIM OSMAN(THE AL -CIA-EDA Asset???
Gioxtream 8 months ago
ideal presidential election would be between this guy and ron paul.
gusseffenjr 3 years ago 5
LOL. God, I would be so torn. It would definetly come down to picking through each of those candidates with a fine tooth comb to make such a descision. Better yet... a Paul/Kucinich ticket.
mcclellan1129 2 years ago
PAUL/KUCINICH 2012
scion53 1 year ago
oh well, maybe some other september
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
reopen 911
AtoK47 3 years ago 5
Its september, I wonder when this is coming!
FlashVirus 3 years ago
Kucinich and Ron paul Good GUYS
and bush and clinton -bad guys
uyoudecide 3 years ago 4
Please visit...
K U C I N I C H . U S
Congressman Dennis Kucinich's official petition to bring about the impeachment of George W. Bush...
He'll personally deliver your message to your congressperson.
K U C I N I C H . U S
Tell everyone!
"Strength Through Peace"
wdroel 3 years ago
Yes wdroel, strength through peace and truth to. We must know the truth. Dennis Kucinich is my hero.
Larzabeth 3 years ago
Just stand up & BE Counted! ReOPEN 911 & doIT Right-no stone unturned. Sign Impeachment & go4 Treason/ Prosecution next on all who would turn this country into a Fascist State. Rise out of your Couch & Get ACTIVE! BlackWater is in CALifornia,Illnois & Texas-the brown troopers R at the gates. HR1955 Radicalism & HomeGrown Terrorism HERE! Do No Harm - BUSH can Call Marshall LAW At AnyTIME!
CORPARANOID 4 years ago 3
THINGS WE KNOW:
1. THAT fire from THAT jet fuel, did not melt or weaken the WTC steel.
2. WTC1,2,6,7 were CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS and no large plane hit the Pentagon
3. We are murdering innocent civilians -- over 600,000 in Iraq alone -- based on lies
4. Based on lies, our Democracy is being stolen by anti-Americans and the U.S. is being turned into a fascist nation
5. Neocon trolls try to bury the truth on sites like these
surfviper 4 years ago 5
investigate 9/11
inside job!
Christian911Truth 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh ah....the history channel investigated it....adn it wasnt an inside job
GIJonathan730 4 years ago
The history channel is part of the corporate media, which works to cover up the truth. So of couse they would conclude that it wasn't.
DKLiberal08 4 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well i listen to people with answers...which happens to be them. All the conspirists do is ask qeustions lyk why and how come? They do the work of 5th graders. Any1 can link a couple of coincidences together and make a conspiracy theory. The people who desserve to be lsitened to are the 1s with the answers. In this case the history channel
GIJonathan730 4 years ago
First off, and I try to avoid name calling on the internet, you are an idiot. The history channel certainly is not the all authoritative bringer of truth. Secondly questions like why and how come are the most important in an investigation. Third the so-called experts on the History Channel were magazine journalists. Lastly, coincidences usually are not coincidences, when they are they are usually called phenomenons.
TylerDurdenInc 4 years ago
why would bush do such a terrible act?
GIJonathan730 4 years ago
I notice you hijacker theorists like to try and dismiss government involvement by focusing on motivation. That's the wrong place to focus. If the towers were brought down by demolitions, the US govt. did it. I don't need to explain why they did it. If science shows the buildings could not collapse like that without demolitions, it's an inside job whether we understand the motives or not.
JulioJuliopolis 4 years ago 2
ah....science has shown that it can be done with dozens of simulations. everyone says the fire couldnt hear steal up enough to burn it. but it could heat it up enough to bend it and that is all that is needed for it to no longer be able to hold up the undreds of thousands of pounds above.
GIJonathan730 4 years ago
You are speaking absolute rubbish. Even if all seven floors that was on fire COMPLETELY vanished, the top section would hit the bottom section and topple over. Its a very basic law of physics called the law of conservation of momentum.
Percy203 4 years ago
nope. not if u study how the buidldings were build. the architect who designed it made sure that if there was a fire/explosion which would cause a collapse....that it would fall striaght down to avoid collateral damage. do some research before you question the u.s. government!
GIJonathan730 4 years ago
no. you do some basic research like reading or watching anything by david ray griffin or architect richard gage and you too can see the official story as not only a fraud, but a transparent fraud. the architect in fact designed the bldgs to withstand the force of a lg passenger jet and stronger, like a level 5 hurricane. plus there's all the eyewitness testimony, the war games, the put options,bush/bin laden ties, able danger,pnac, the destruction of air traffic controller testimonies...
kitchawan 4 years ago 2
if the reason the towers started to collapse was due to fire weakening the steel, it is still absolutely impossible to explain how all three buildings collapsed with a sudden onset. One second they are standing, the next they are falling.
When steel melts it bends and sags. There should have been beams bending, floors sagging, gurders twisting, but there is no evidence of this AT ALL.
That is why hundreds of engineers are now campaigning for a new investigation.
Percy203 4 years ago 2
Off all those simulations none have released their model and data into the public domain.
So the accuracy of those simulations can not be verified - it's not scientific.
rspawn 4 years ago
Actually, Means, Motive and Opportunity are good places to focus if there's lack of direct evidence.
Also the circumstances before, during and after the crime are good places to focus.
Ie, many of the "changes" cited as a response to 9/11 did in fact take place before 9/11: plan to invade Iraq, plan to divide Iraq's oil among US/western oil corporations, plan for privatization in Iraq, negotiations with US Telcos to enable warrentless wiretapping on US citizens.
rspawn 4 years ago
"First off, and I try to avoid name calling on the internet"
I think you can succeed if you try just a little bit harder.
Calling people names in the cause of argument is a logical fallacy; it's "ad hominem".
rspawn 4 years ago
Thank you rspawn, you are right. I obviousily failed in this instance and using names is exactly what Popular Mechanics, "the experts" did when attempting to sway opinion in favor of themselves and the official story versus "too much time on their hands" "Get a job" "theorists" on the history channel. It was an off day when I said that. Instead of writing what I did, I should of just spoke my peace and avoided the name calling. I hurt my argument by doing so. Thank you.
TylerDurdenInc 4 years ago
Yes, History Channel is corporate owned and Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation..wouldn't they want the corporate agenda believed? Your whole gov't is also corporate owned and controlled.
zenbrenzz 3 years ago
Dennis is the man who has the plans and has had the plans. Dennis makes sense ... plain common sense.
Want a real change in direction? Study Kucinich's videos ... learn all you can and then tell all you know to anybody who will listen!!!
There is hope. The truth does matter.
Wolfiemouse 4 years ago 4
YES TO STEM CELL RESEARCH!
YES TO Gay Marriage RIGHTS!
YES TO WELFARE ON OUR VETERANS!
YES TO ANOTHER 9/11 INVESTIGATION!
YES TO MIKE GRAVEL FOR PRESIDENT 2008!
Gravel 08
Gravel4President08 4 years ago
Dennis Kucinich,
You are brilliant. You saved Cleveland 30 years ago, and because of it you were voted as congressman, as you will also be voted president!
linguy22 4 years ago
The 911 Commission did not investigate why building 7 fell on that day. It was not hit by a plane. Buildings on both sides of it were fine and still stand today, yet Building 7 (47 stories) fell in a few seconds like a controlled demolition. Didn't the commission think that was worth investigating?
eakle 4 years ago
There is one paradigm shift that has to happen in terms of the way the so-called truth movement asserts, validates, and defends, its' positions and objectives. Here it is: It is not the truth movement's job to prove a damn thing, it is the government's job to prove to a convincing degree it did not orchestrate 9/11, and that it is not covering up facts about 9/11.
tornadohurricane5 4 years ago
Absolutely! Couldn't agree more! So why have I seen you posting crap about mini-nukes in other threads?
momerath42 4 years ago
Thank you for being observant enough to notice my posts.
I am not sure why you imply an inconsistency between my feeling the government should be put on the defense to challenge it to prove it's innocence
(which it can't because it's guilty), and my putting forth of knowledge about the mechanisms actually used to do the pulverization.
tornadohurricane5 4 years ago
P.S. We don't need theories, we've got facts demanding we ask the unanswered questions. What melted all that steel? What caused the collapse of building 7? Why is any evidence, including eye-witness testimony, in support of controlled demolition omitted from the official reports?
caleb4mj 4 years ago 4
I fully support a new investigation, as whether people want to admit it or not, the government DID have some kind of helping hand in the attacks, however it would wise to present yourself as a person in support of a new investigation to answer questions rather than present yourself as someone forcing the idea that the government carried it out.
travishenrichs 4 years ago
I think everyone can agree there's more to 9/11 than the government is willing to release/admit, truther or not. It just makes it harder to call for a new investigation when you start meddling with ones who would like to pin all the blame on one organization or country. If there really is never a new investigation, I don't think it's time to theorize, I think it's time to take up arms.
travishenrichs 4 years ago 2
OK, Kucinich is an honest democrat. Big feather from me, but the socialism he promotes is still poor government policy.
How about a debate that only includes those candidates that want to work for America, as opposed to the council on foreign relations?
Paul, Gravel, and Kucinich debate the future of America, ignoring the CFR clones like the msm ignores the real America.
kangalanatolian 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maybe I'd be at least slightly inclined to listen to the conspiracy theorists if they weren't all raving lunatics.
yoweigh 4 years ago
They all aren't. They are people who question things and find the evidence to question them.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago 2
9/11 = INSIDE JOB
Kuc knows
mrzack888 4 years ago 5
Give 'em hell, Denny boy!
D4268 4 years ago 11
The ideal election is still Paul vs. Kucinich. Transparent government would come from either.
MiriadX 4 years ago 32
obama has also co-sponsored a bill asking for govt accountability in spending.
tony4moroney 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama is CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
wraft 4 years ago 3
I've seen this sentiment widely expressed, and yours is maybe the highest voted comment I've seen on the tube since the voting went in. I love it! It really gives me hope for this country!
Now how about Kucinich/Paul vs Paul/Kucinich!!!!!
momerath42 4 years ago 2
Bin Laden and al Queda were not involved in 9-11; no evidence, because they didn't do it.
AgentCozmo 4 years ago 19
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kucinich and Paul are cool, but I'm concerned that neither has the GUTS to get things done if elected. Gravel is the one who does.
partgreen 4 years ago
I still prefer Ron Paul.
Nicholai420 4 years ago 6
You can't prosecute and expose the truth just by a lot of shouting. Kucinich is in Congress and has the power, opportunity, courage, and integrity to legally investigate 9-11, which he has pledged to do. I think it's brilliant to go for financial holes in the story, because financial matters tend to leave a paper trail. The man knows what he's doing. Let's support his forthcoming investigation and may the truth be exposed for all.
TheHotPotatoes 4 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
wilburjr 4 years ago
I'm not impressed. Great effort. It's something for sure. But I think he skillfully avoided addressing 9/11 as an inside job. And he knows damn well people are talking about that. He needed to be pressed on this issue. That there are many people that believe that 9/11 was an inside job and want an investigation specifically addressing this point. We have to back them into corner on this very point or they will find a way to weasel out of it.
LakeshoreBaby 4 years ago
Hey, he is doing something! That's a whole lot more then a certain favorite son candidate. On top of that the 9/11 Press for Truth team is trying to mobilize people to send their congresspeople "Press for Truth" packs so they can get behind this. Just because it is not talked about by AJ does not mean it is not happening.
jackolantern6 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Doing something? Like blaming the USA instead of facing reality? What a fruitcake!
espada9 4 years ago
yer stupid... don't you know how bad he would lose if he came out and said that? He'd be villified. He's smart enough to be vauge so he can get nominated. duh
BadMuffler 4 years ago
Are you an idiot? That's political suicide given our corrupt MSM! Ron Paul flat out denied that he thought it was 'perpetrated by our government', but he's still my favorite candidate, because he *would* have it investigated (let the facts speak for themselves) unlike everyone else but kucinich (my 2nd fav).
momerath42 4 years ago 2
Yeah, I think some are so anxious to get the whole truth movement thing going that they neglect the impact it would have on Ron Paul's campaign had he just flat out said the government position he's running for had a helping hand in the attacks. Even if it's true, it would surely be the end of his presidential run.
travishenrichs 4 years ago
Ron Paul 2008
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
What does Ron Paul have to do with THIS? Ron Paul is doing NOTHING about 9/11.
lenaw70 4 years ago
9/11? What are you talking about? Isnt Kucinich running for President? Americans UNITE > Ron Paul 2008
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
bbruwiler8, what are YOU talking about? This has to do with the 9/11 truth movement. I can fill you in if you really want to know.
lenaw70 4 years ago
if u r aware of the 911 truth movement, then I commend you. i assure u that i do not need to be filled in.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
I echo your sentiments, lenaw.
jackolantern6 4 years ago 2
What do you want him to do? Ron Paul is much more integrated into the movement calling for a new investigation of 9/11 than Kucinich is.
travishenrichs 4 years ago
travishenrichs...Ron Paul publicly announced that he doesnt believe the 9/11 was an inside job!
lenaw70 4 years ago 2
Since when did calling for a new investigation require you to believe 9/11 was an inside job? It would be ignorant to believe the US didn't have a helping hand in 9/11, but it would be even more ignorant to just flat out say the government position you're running for carried out the attacks.
travishenrichs 4 years ago 3
I'm sure an honest investigation will prove once and for all it was an inside job. Then I will kindly tell Ron Paul to go fuck himself for dragging his feet when the families who lost their loved ones needed support. They, these families, are crying for a new investigation. It was an inside job. Who covered it up?
caleb4mj 4 years ago
because it would be political suicide to do so.
insertusernamehere3 4 years ago
I sure hope he is careful (knowing what happened to JFK) We NEED this man to become president! He already had a hit put on him before, go watch it in my favorite videos.
lenaw70 4 years ago
the ultimate 911 documentary. watch --> ZEITGEIST - THE MOVIE <-- this is The Ultimate Con.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
I mean the terrorists flew the planes. But honestly a lot of 9/11 doesn't make sense. And because of that, half of the 9/11 victims believe there is a conspiracy. Half, not 25%, not 10%, but 50%, a significant number. Even the co-chairs of the 9/11 commission admit it was effed up (they don't believe there was a conspiracy).
thinkpad15 4 years ago
lol.. and where is your source? Show me a scientific poll that says this not some college student asking misleading questions to people to fake a poll. I mean if 50% believe this... why have i yet to meet someone who does? Btw internet polls aren't accurate... Since they do not get a broad range of people. If you go to loosechange website and do a poll how is it gonna turn out every time?
Cecil811 4 years ago
Excuse you sir, but I do not understand what you are talking about. I never mentioned loose change or talked about an internet poll. I did however mention the co-chairs of whom you do not mention, nor do you mention the commission's testimony of the israeli-palestinian problem. I cannot find the poll but Zogby International does say half of new yorkers believe the u.s gov't had foreknowledge of which you can search for yourself. Don't attack me for no reason.
thinkpad15 4 years ago
maybe they did have an idea that something was gonna happen maybe they didnt... who knows.. but the conspiracy nut jobs use youtube to try to push false info all the time.. what was known is far differant then putting bombs in the world trade center and blowing it up.. the thing doesn't even look like a demolition.. where are all the squibs? why are the explosions of dust comeing from the top insteed of the bottom?
Cecil811 4 years ago
are you retarded? have you ever watched the videos of the towers collapsing? there's squibs popping out all over the place, 20-30 floors below the collapse wave.
operatorkos 4 years ago
Firefighters and construction workers said they saw molten steel beneath all three WTC buildings, and that it looked like controlled demolition. It was still molten weeks later. Energy, like matter, is neither created nor destroyed, it merely changes form. Hiding it is a lot harder than proving it.
caleb4mj 4 years ago
I just wish the passenger lists contained the terrorists but they don't. And what's the deal with Usama? This president doesn't really care as evidenced by a recorded segment of CNN. wtf this guy flew planes with bombs into the towers and we don't care? geez
thinkpad15 4 years ago
Thats funny... Since phone calls from the plane actually say they were on the plane and stabbing people. Phone calls that came from "air phones" not celphones (another lie in your video).. I've used an air phone before.. they work. Also saying a person would never use his full name when talking to his mom.. guess what. his mom said he did it all the time
Cecil811 4 years ago
What do the phone calls have to do with the passenger lists? It seems to me that you haven't watched loose change or any of those other movies, but you want to insult people who watched the films so that they will believe what you believe. That won't work. The films raised some questions which noone seems to want to answer, so just watch the films, then come up with logical answers for each of the questions raised, and then people will gladly listen to you.
n8glenn 4 years ago
no bodies were recovered from ANY of the plane crashes. no bodies were found at the pentagon nor in PA. look at the evidence watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, loose change, 911 in plane site, terror storm, money masters <-- in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
But remains were found.. Look up f4 phantom vs wall on youtube..
Funny didn't your video say that a plane wouldn't vaporize hitting a wall?... odd... i mean are my eye controled by the goverment to make me see things now?
Cecil811 4 years ago
sifting thru rubble? they shipped all that 'rubble' to China right away to destroy evidence, and u think that while removing that rubble they would not have found all the bodies? that's the point, there were no bodies, the bodies were exploded into tiny fragments and spread over 75 acres. sick
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
So basicly what you just said is you have no evidence of these claims.. Thank you.. it wasn't that hard was it?
Cecil811 4 years ago
Watch footage of the twin towers, it's obvious they're EXPLODING into dust, NOT COLLAPSING, 1100 bodies were NEVER recovered. WHAT?! How could that be? They were sent into that cloud of dust by EXPLOSIVES. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- witnesses told reporters that BOMBS were going off INSIDE the towers. PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
No where in the movie did it say 1100 bodies were never recovered... Just like a nut case.. makeing stuff up. Now some bodies weren't recovered in the plane crashes.. but that is differant. Also dust is your proof? LOL..
Cecil811 4 years ago
btw not saying bodies weren't found just saying you have no source for your info.. because 1361 was the number.. But being such a well informed person you knew that right?
Cecil811 4 years ago
And they are still finding body parts till this day. Many more of those 1361 reported days after 911 have infact been found. But shifting through 1000s of tons of ruble (yes rubble not "dust"..) Is like finding a needle in a hay stack. Its sad really
Cecil811 4 years ago
Why all the comments about demolition? This was the first news that a hearing would be held in the Congress in September about financial issues in 9/11. Three years after the 9/11 Commission's 'final report' was delivered? That is big news, ladies and gentlemen.
concord3456 4 years ago
Sounds like you are talking about your own comments. 911 mysteries uses indisputable science to PROVE that the towers were brought down with explosives planted in the building. A highly sophisticated controlled demolition. An inside job. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <--
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
The fact that you can't even admit that its not a documentary proves your a nut case that can't be reasoned with. I've watched the films.. and it can be disputed. Matter of fact many things in the film are very much lies. The definition i gave you is text book.. i didn't even write it i copied and pasted. Are you saying that personal feelings did not go into these movies?
Cecil811 4 years ago
I read a report called Screw Screw Loose Change and it seems to actually screw the Screw Loose Change report. If you watch the archived news, officials did report bombs. Anyway, at the 9/11 commission hearings though, it was admitted they attacked us because of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict whereas Bush on the other hand tells us its about our Freedoms. Is it no wonder people want he and cheney impeached.
thinkpad15 4 years ago
sites? what sites? OH! you mean the documentaries that have been uploaded onto YouTube and Google Video! OH! LOL You had me confused, sorry, because u said sites. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <--
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
Documentary- objective: emphasizing or expressing things as perceived without distortion of personal feelings, insertion of fictional matter, or interpretation; "objective art"
These movies are not documentries. They clearly have a bias. Even you have to admit that. They are very light on proof and EVERYTHING in it can be countered with someone with true knowledge of buildings. Where are the engineers in the film? A janitor? New reports? Yes they know it all
Cecil811 4 years ago
Watch footage of the twin towers, it's obvious they are EXPLODING into dust, NOT COLLAPSING, 1100 bodies were NEVER recovered. WHAT?! How could that be? They were sent into that cloud of dust by EXPLOSIVES. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- witnesses told reporters that BOMBS were going off INSIDE the towers. in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
Because an aircraft would sound like what exactly? I mean i am guessing it would sound kinda like an explosion but hey who knows.
Cecil811 4 years ago
And also.. Umm what do you think was in the Aircraft makeing it fly? Water? Ever watch the video of the Aircraft hitting the building? Did you notice that when it hit IT EXPLODED.
Cecil811 4 years ago
Jet fuel just cant melt steel; otherwise, every plane would fall from the sky. Did u see burning people at the top of the towers? See glowing hot steel beams? See a raging inferno? Or a lot of black smoke, like an oxygen starved fire? Look at the evidence. watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, 911 in plane site, terror storm, loose change, money masters <-- Molten steel was still there SIX WEEKS LATER, question the official story, tell others
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
Ohhh so to weaken steel it must be molten? And no molten METAL was there.. Other metals are used in buildings that melt at much lower degrees. To weaken a metal you need a fraction of the heat. (i work with welding every day.. To bend steel you do not need to melt it and to even suggest you do is stupid)
Cecil811 4 years ago
So.. basicly all the sites you have listed put down the argument of.. omg it doesn't melt at the same degrees of jet fuel! Must be a bomb... WHy? Cause they prey on people like you being ignorant of the fact that yes.. it does not melt.. but being weakened adn then haveing 100s of tons of weight on it means.. down goes the building
Cecil811 4 years ago
Firefighters say they saw molten steel flowing like lava. I tend to believe the firefighters. Building 7 collapsed in 6.6 seconds, all 47 stories straight down, not like the twin towers. It wasn't hit by a plane and molten steel was found beneath it weeks later. To deny these facts is exactly what the 9/11 commission did. Cover up with intent, thus inside job.
caleb4mj 4 years ago 4
Kucinich is smart not to invoke conspiracy theories, but to say what we all know - the Bush administration and congress obstructed justice by refusing to conduct serious and extensive investigations in a timely manner with all parties accountable for their actions or lack thereof. How can you have an investigation that states outright that it will not assign blame for fear of hurting people's feelings. That is not right.
CavemanSynthesizer 4 years ago
I like his 'pre selected' audience joke. That was sweet!
sillypeople5 4 years ago
somebody get that man a bodyguard. and keep him off airplanes! this may be our only hope.
AnthonyBono 4 years ago
GO DENNIS GO!
ElCarcho 4 years ago
Kucinich Rocks
lovuian 4 years ago
So True
My FAV is how we trained and gave bin laden BILLIONS
And the BBC censoring the same reporter TWICE on 9/11
When it involed Building Seven
Garbonzo07 4 years ago
9/11 was an inside job, from every single angle you could care to even investigate, from the financial aspects to the fundamental laws of physics.
denialisimpotence 4 years ago