TORONTO July 2007,(Reuters) - Uncircumcised men receive no more sexual sensation than
circumcised men, according to a new study that contradicts the widely held belief.
Researchers from McGill University in Montreal Canada found that circumcised men felt the same amount of sensitivity to touch and pain in various states of sexual arousal
circol, the foreskin is the most densely nerved part of the penis. How does cutting off the foreskin not reduce sexual sensation? Amputating the foreskin also eliminates the penis' ability to have mobility during sex and masturbation. Again, how does that not affect sexual sensation? Nature knew what it was doing by giving males & females the genitals they were born with. Altering them in any way can only do harm--not good.
Contains about 4,000 nerve endings, but they are pressure/pain-sensitive, not touch sensitive. These pressure/pain-sensitive nerves are called "Pacinian Corpuscles" and "Free Nerves"
Male Foreskin:
Contains about 20,000 nerve endings which are extremely touch sensitive (like the female clitoris). These touch-sensitive nerves are called "Meissner's Corpuscles"
dont force the religion on babies with the help of a knife!!!stop forcing religions/ myths on babies!!
IbnNero 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
TORONTO July 2007,(Reuters) - Uncircumcised men receive no more sexual sensation than
circumcised men, according to a new study that contradicts the widely held belief.
Researchers from McGill University in Montreal Canada found that circumcised men felt the same amount of sensitivity to touch and pain in various states of sexual arousal
as those with foreskins.
circol 3 years ago
The body adapts. I met a guy with one arm (cut off at the elbow) who could play basketball as good as anyone else he played with.
veko 3 years ago
circol, the foreskin is the most densely nerved part of the penis. How does cutting off the foreskin not reduce sexual sensation? Amputating the foreskin also eliminates the penis' ability to have mobility during sex and masturbation. Again, how does that not affect sexual sensation? Nature knew what it was doing by giving males & females the genitals they were born with. Altering them in any way can only do harm--not good.
EscapeSociety 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Circumcision Doesn't Reduce Sexual
Satisfaction And Performance, Says Study Of 4,500 Men
ScienceDaily (Jan. 8, 2008) — More than 98 per cent of men who are circumcised can enjoy the
same levels of sexual satisfaction and performance as men who are not, according to a study
of nearly 4,500 males published in the January issue of the UK-based urology journal BJU
International.
circol 3 years ago
Male Glans (head): 4,000 nerve endings
Female Clitoris: 8,000 nerve endings
Male Foreskin: 20,000 nerve endings
The Male Glans:
Contains about 4,000 nerve endings, but they are pressure/pain-sensitive, not touch sensitive. These pressure/pain-sensitive nerves are called "Pacinian Corpuscles" and "Free Nerves"
Male Foreskin:
Contains about 20,000 nerve endings which are extremely touch sensitive (like the female clitoris). These touch-sensitive nerves are called "Meissner's Corpuscles"
freedom0f5peech 3 years ago 9
I agree, circumcision is barbaric!
Infant circumcision is always wrong. Child circumcision is always wrong. I don't buy into any of those excuses to justify it. They are just excuses.
Boys and girls are entitled to their complete bodies.
Men and women are entitled to their complete bodies.
2live42day 3 years ago 13