This was the election I think even Conservatives must have wished they hadn't won. ERM, Back To Basics scandals, botched rail privatisation still draining billions in subsidies today, all topped off by 13 years of Labour majorities to follow. If Kinnock's Labour Party had won '92, things would have been vastly different - '97 may have been a genuine competition. And Blair's New Labour may never have arisen. You have to wonder, don't you...
@RyanTheHeretic Brilliant thought. However, Blair would've become PM after the death of John Smith, and I'm sure the idea of 'New Labour' had already infested that party. It has certainly changed since those days and not for the better. New Labour policies have f**ked this country up beyond recognition.
If Labour had won in 1992, they would have lost in 1997. Black Wednesday would have destroyed them as a political force, just like it fatally wounded the Tories.
Is this the opening segment to 1992 or 2010? A Government that has been in power for 13 years beset by economic problems. A colourless Prime Minister facing the electorate for the first time. Mmm I wonder...
Labour were lucky not to be elected to government in this election during this period with the conservative government having to deal with the recession of the early 90's, withdrawing from the ERM after black Wednesday, and vast amounts of political sleaze and bitter infighting over Europe, so in a funny way losing the 1992 general election probably contributed to Labour's landslide victory in 1997.
No. The ERM debacle wouldn't have been as damaging for labour. The Tories would have been divided in opposition and labour would be leading the recovery. Hurd would have been clobbered in 96/97.
Labour -for the working class and ordinary people-best joke I've heard this year! The latest job that Blair, the murderer has accepted is from a hedge fund! He will accept money from any source. As for Brown-abolishing the 10p threshold which helped lower earners-beggars belief.
The tories have to be an improvement on this useless bunch of hypocrites.
I predict the following prediction for the 2010 General Election...
CONS 350 LAB 215 LIB DEM 58
A Year ago I would have guessed that Cons would have got 400+... I dont think this will happen as David Cameron is a slimy Fat Bastard who knows nothing of REAL life. I suspect a slim Conservative win for 2010.. Labour WILL be back again... HISTORY ALWAYS REPEATS ITSELF.. I predict maybe 2 Terms for the Conservatives. I could be wrong
Who cares who wins the 2010 election. Whoever wins nothing substantial will change for the better. All three main parties serve the internationalist NWO elite.
I agree - the only thing the Tory Bullingdon Boy, Eton Dave will wave is millions of people's P45's, as he consigns another generation of ordinary (and, yes, working class) people to years on the unemployment scrapheap, (including me) while cossetting and pampering the rich and influential friends of the Conservative Party, giving them free rein to indulge and increase their already immense wealth and privilege.
Perhaps the biggest disappointment however, is that in 12 years of government Labour did not do more to redress the imbalances and injustices which prevail in this country - neither have they overturned any of Margaret Thatcher's flagship privatizations of our core industries. None of those insidious, greed inducing schemes have been wholly or even partly reversed.
@rich1701 nope they need about a 7.5% swing (not taking boundry changes into account which actualy lowers this) When Liebour won in 1997 they had an 11.5% swing.
I have no swingometer... but I do remain confused when i hear pundits on news channels saying in order win, the conservatives need a larger swing than Labour achieved in 1945...
We'll all hold you to that promise! Even I will concede that Gordon Brown and the Labour Party winning an outright majority is unlikely. However, there is still a not unrealistic possibility of David Cameron and the Conservative Party not having sufficient numbers to govern with an outright, working majority...
The funny thing is that the exit polls/final opinion polls in both 1983 and 2005 were absolutely correct, but in between they made mistakes, especially in 1987 and 1992.
1983 initial BBC prediction: C majority of 146 seats (144)
2005 initial BBC prediction: Lab majority of 66 seats (66)
im young & im interested in politics but most ppl my age dont care. they dont vote and probs never will. i think politics shud be taught in primary/secondary schools. itll get kids involved. run sum elections with different candidates and stuff. i wudve loved it
run unbiased political education at the same time as school elections or you'll get ignorant little brats swaying elections. my school may 2010 election; libdems won with around 375 votes to 80 con, 75 lab, 71 green, all after clegg's lies + a libdem biased history teacher ran the thing + one of the libdem sixth form candidates had big knockers so the younger lads voted for her (not being bitter i actually heard that being said!)
I'm surprised no one's commented on how good the graphics are for 1992! One could be forgiven for mistaking this with a modern election! As soon as they cut over to the various places around the country it's obvious just how shiny and pristine that intro really was.
I wish Labour won the hung parliament in 1992 because Michael Portillo would have been leader of the party after major and would have won 1997 and Blair and Brown would not of existed .
Lets be honest if Kinnock won 1992....they would be blown out in 1997 with the ERM under Labour. Granted I'm Conservative but the 4th win was a poison pill because if the ERM. We have been paying the price since. But 2010 will be a Tory Majority.
No. The role that the ERM played in 1997 has been massively exagerated and in any case the reason that it hurt the Tories so much was that they had no one else to blame for it. A new labour government would have been able to benefit from the recovery and a divided tory party lead by Douglas Hurd. A labour government in its first term would have been much more united than a fag-end tory government in its fourth.
I remember this one -- CBC Newsworld was simulcasting this in Canada. I watched the first 15 minutes at 5 pm Eastern and left home thinking Kinnock would pull off a squeaker -- when I got back and saw Major had pulled it off I was shocked. I think this one pretty much put the kibbosh on exit polls everywhere in the democratic world, you just can't rely on them as a model.
I remember this election as the one were the exit poll was wrong and John Major was returned to downing street.Now those who think its going to be a tory landslide in 2010 then think agian it will be close very close just as this election in 92 was
Perhaps. But the difference in opinion poll ratings in the 12 months leading up to said election were considerably narrower than they are now. Plus, Major was seen as the lesser of two evils. I'd suggest that although people might be unsure of Cameron they're sick to death of Brown and will vote (or abstain) acordingly. Time will tell..
BBC Parliament occasionally re-show an entire election nights coverage. They have recently shown the 1979 one. Summer recess is coming up so they may show a couple then.
If Kinnock had won this General election Britain wouldn't be in such a fucking mess as it is now with the Blairites and New Labour. We would never had heard of Tony Blair.
I love this version of the music - it's fully orchestral, with sweeping choirs. Rather dramatic for the likes ofJohn Major and Paddy Ashdown, though! In the run-up to the election, I wrote to Peter Snow and got a signed photograph. I was 11, and (as it was the holidays) I was allowed to stay up until 2am (which was Chris Patten losing his seat).
It's quite fun. one of the nice things about it is how informal it is. Just a couple of people ask your name and address and cross you off a list. They then give you a ballot paper and u mark it in a voting booth.
Not like in America where they have to check every last detail to make sure ur not black, I mean a convict. No offence to the US but I don't think they've ever organised an election properly.
I don't think so. Will the country really want a stuck up toffy nosed git like him in charge? He has no policies, no carisma, no experience. The guy has never had a proper job before he entered parliament. He has been a parasite from his fathers vast wealth.
I think hung parliament with the liberals wanting PR for their support.
That comment to me shows ignorance on your part David Cameron does have policies he has unvieled plans for local gov, he is against ID card etc (watch the news, read a paper) He obviously does have charisma or he wouldnt be ahead in the polls, experience means jack look at Obama barely anything a yet he holds one of the most powerful offices in the world. As wealth most of those in parliament are public school boys Blair and Brown were Cameron is a slightly bigger public school boy!
I suppose a return to the upper class Tory toffs of the old days is better than carrying on with Gordon Brown and his cronies.
And PR wouldn't work over here. Have you seen how indecisive the population is in terms of the popular vote? You'd have tons of bloated coalition governments that would get bogged down (like in Italy or Isreal).
I think the way things are going under Gordon Brown at the moment there will be a Tory landslide. Just because Cameron is upper class doesn't mean he will be a bad PM, Winston Churchill was upper class too.
Why the hell would being upperclass be a detriment? Are people in the UK so envious of others' success or status that they wouldn't want to see a wealthy person in a position of power?
I doubt he will be the next Maggie I think he is too moderate and quite cute and fluffy when it comes to social issues ..BUT he will be the next PM I think were looking at a majority of 69-80 seats at the moment. However if things continue to go south for Brown Cameron may just pull a 100 seat landslide soo fingers crossed!
Oh well it will never be Prime Minister Cameron, so I guess Labour and Tories almost even, or will be when Mr Brown wins next year!
I wonder if Mr Hague will become the next Tory Leader (again) when Mr Cameron steps down on Friday 7th May 2010, when he loses the next general election?!
To the polls right now nobody will be a majority, but I think the Tories will be the largest, however it should be noted in 2010, Labour will be tired and worn out. Its the Tories turn to win.
I vote that next time we all chip in to buy Peter Snow a decent suit that was coutured in Italy and not made in Bombay. That would make a Tory victory even sweeter. Shallow I know, but I am a Tory.
Seriously, after this Jon Snow must have been so pissed off that the exit poll was so wrong. I always liked John Major, the low key grey man, but he had to play historys' runt to Thatchers' pre-eminence much as Gordon Brown is having to do now before the next big electoral swing back to Blue.
I seriously never get why in ANY country anyone wants their party to be in rule "forever". You're just ASKING for corruption and laziness if you ask me.
Sooo.....we can't really call ourselves a democracy when the highest figure in government is there simply for being born into that position. Presidents, no matter how well they fare, at least have to work to get to their position.
I would have thought you'd have worked that out to be honest! Mind you, as the only comment on your profile says "you're and idiot", and only an idiot would shun the importance of having a leader we can elect.
Actually, you will find that most if not all democracies have people who are unelected and yet wield much more power than our monarch. If the queen was making policy it would be a different matter. You will also find that Gerald Ford was never elected and yet was able to conduct US foreign policy on a day to day basis.
I think you are confusing the role of leader in a practical sense with that of head of state.
Do their highest houses (for us, the House of Lords), comprise entirely of unelected people? Not one single member of Britain's highest court, and law making body were elected by the British people. They also have to swear to the Queen. Thankfully, some people have the courgae to stand up for freedom - as several MPs spoke out (while reading their oath), against the Queen. One once sat in her chair and said "I abolish the monarchy".
It's time we got rid of this ancient establishment.
As per the 1949 parliament Act, the house of commons has the ability to dominate the Lords. In any case it is an entirely seperate issue from the monarchy. You're claim that not one single member of our highest court was elected is a little strange. Are you suggesting that we should have an elected judiciary? And have you forgotten about the supreme court? A Supreme Court justice has far more power than a member of the house of Lords.
Doesn't the fact that the Queen has no power just prove Georgiahulse's point? The PM's power is too great, and it needs balancing, that's why we need a President of Britain. Besides, why pend millions of taxpayers money on an eternal lame-duck head of state? It would be more cost-effective to have a republic.
No because the existence of a non-party political head of state prevents the PM from becoming as 'presidential' as an actual US president. If we want to balance t5he power of the PM, we should do it by strengthening parliament, not by elected another figure head.
A presidency would be far more costly than a monarchy and and would lack the advantages I've mentioned.
what it also did was killed off socialism and it made the Labour party give up everything it ever stood for..adopt tory policies and have a 'tory' in charge in Blair in order to get elected..however, just like in 1979 when Thatcher came in to clean up the economic mess that Labour had left, history is repeating itself and Cameron will have to come in and clean up the horrific mess Brown has left
Well, you'd better get rid of your telly in 2010, because you're not going to be a happy bunny when we all say farewell to thirteen years of New Labour.
Bring back this theme!!
henrygsterling 10 months ago
This was the election I think even Conservatives must have wished they hadn't won. ERM, Back To Basics scandals, botched rail privatisation still draining billions in subsidies today, all topped off by 13 years of Labour majorities to follow. If Kinnock's Labour Party had won '92, things would have been vastly different - '97 may have been a genuine competition. And Blair's New Labour may never have arisen. You have to wonder, don't you...
RyanTheHeretic 1 year ago 2
@RyanTheHeretic Brilliant thought. However, Blair would've become PM after the death of John Smith, and I'm sure the idea of 'New Labour' had already infested that party. It has certainly changed since those days and not for the better. New Labour policies have f**ked this country up beyond recognition.
neil73 10 months ago
I assume they had a little egg on their faces at the end of the night.
aperson22222 1 year ago
im just here for the rick wakeman awesomeness
rand1182 1 year ago
the shy tory factor
pimmagrimm 1 year ago
at 5:07 the moment they [redicted the election really wrong NK alreadly had his sheffield rally
199019852007 1 year ago
@199019852007 They went with what they had. The exit poll highly underestimated the Tory vote through no fault of their own.
keda1981 1 year ago
I was born in 1992 and i love this election i think major was a good pm and he should have won in 97 but those scandals did not help
GamerYetPolitical92 1 year ago
If Labour had won in 1992, they would have lost in 1997. Black Wednesday would have destroyed them as a political force, just like it fatally wounded the Tories.
Myndir 1 year ago
@Myndir
I think given their reputation at the time, it would have actually have destroyed the party.
Awitsaduck 1 year ago
John Major was the last Tory to win an election outright!
PeteGeeza86 1 year ago 2
@PeteGeeza86 John Major also won more votes than any party leader. Ever.
Myndir 1 year ago
Damn - they all look so young!
tdp1909 1 year ago
Wonderful happy days under a Conservative government.
shussey100 1 year ago
@shussey100
I doubt that even many Tories would call the early 1990's "wonderful happy days", with the exception of their 1992 Election victory, of course.
dartaddict 1 year ago
Thanks for uploading this.
WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 1 year ago
will we have the same theme tune in this years election night?
harrow233 1 year ago
@harrow233 Apparently not. It's been replaced for this year.
FanaticFerrariFan 1 year ago
wow david dimbelby has coloured hair
Oneandoneself 1 year ago 2
cant wait for election nite 2010 such a close election this time round. closest 4 20 yrs
longlivejacko 1 year ago
Wasn't the result in the end a Tory majority of 21?
daro2096 1 year ago 2
@daro2096 about a 36 CON majority
JamesBinns 1 year ago
I remember this. I stayed up til nearly 4am and then had to be up at 7.30 to go to school(I was in the lower sixth form at the time).
daro2096 1 year ago 2
i thought the most famous street in the world was sesame street!
davidsan01 1 year ago
yeah they do im 23 and no my age gives a shit about it lol
tescoskick 1 year ago
Is this the opening segment to 1992 or 2010? A Government that has been in power for 13 years beset by economic problems. A colourless Prime Minister facing the electorate for the first time. Mmm I wonder...
densaner77 1 year ago
Labour were lucky not to be elected to government in this election during this period with the conservative government having to deal with the recession of the early 90's, withdrawing from the ERM after black Wednesday, and vast amounts of political sleaze and bitter infighting over Europe, so in a funny way losing the 1992 general election probably contributed to Labour's landslide victory in 1997.
opinionater 1 year ago
No. The ERM debacle wouldn't have been as damaging for labour. The Tories would have been divided in opposition and labour would be leading the recovery. Hurd would have been clobbered in 96/97.
slimes23 1 year ago 3
if he saying 10pm in the UK it would be 5pm where i am and nice opening theme
jamallugo 1 year ago
Woah, how does David Dimbleby get to those places so fast?
WillAndersony 2 years ago
poll Fail
maxime32 2 years ago 28
@maxime32 lolz! thats a big thing to fail
johnfox3 1 year ago
Kinnock's speech in the early hours of the morning aFTER HE HAD LOST was great...one of his best..
Indul1 2 years ago 3
Labour -for the working class and ordinary people-best joke I've heard this year! The latest job that Blair, the murderer has accepted is from a hedge fund! He will accept money from any source. As for Brown-abolishing the 10p threshold which helped lower earners-beggars belief.
The tories have to be an improvement on this useless bunch of hypocrites.
Biancas4 2 years ago
THE BBC WERE MILES AWAY WITH THERE PREDICTION...
I predict the following prediction for the 2010 General Election...
CONS 350 LAB 215 LIB DEM 58
A Year ago I would have guessed that Cons would have got 400+... I dont think this will happen as David Cameron is a slimy Fat Bastard who knows nothing of REAL life. I suspect a slim Conservative win for 2010.. Labour WILL be back again... HISTORY ALWAYS REPEATS ITSELF.. I predict maybe 2 Terms for the Conservatives. I could be wrong
papermariob 2 years ago
Who cares who wins the 2010 election. Whoever wins nothing substantial will change for the better. All three main parties serve the internationalist NWO elite.
aeronuk1 2 years ago
These election themes sound as if they've just come out of the Soviet Union.
pardeepsinghk 2 years ago 3
This is what election 2010 will be like, too close to call.
rich1701 2 years ago 3
YOU ARE JOKING!!!!!
I will make a video of me eatting my foot and I will put it on Youtube if Gordon Brown wins the 2010 Election!
He has NO chance of winning.
It will be all-change in the next Election.
papermariob 2 years ago
I think you under estimate the swing cameron needs to win an outright majority, let alone a landslide. It will need to be the biggest in history.
rich1701 2 years ago
I HOPE you are right, But I hate to say it.. Cameron will be the next PM..
Time will of course tell. We will find out in May this Year.
I feel so sorry for the people who think "Dave" will wave his magic wand.
papermariob 2 years ago
I agree - the only thing the Tory Bullingdon Boy, Eton Dave will wave is millions of people's P45's, as he consigns another generation of ordinary (and, yes, working class) people to years on the unemployment scrapheap, (including me) while cossetting and pampering the rich and influential friends of the Conservative Party, giving them free rein to indulge and increase their already immense wealth and privilege.
KendoSaggyknackers 2 years ago
Perhaps the biggest disappointment however, is that in 12 years of government Labour did not do more to redress the imbalances and injustices which prevail in this country - neither have they overturned any of Margaret Thatcher's flagship privatizations of our core industries. None of those insidious, greed inducing schemes have been wholly or even partly reversed.
KendoSaggyknackers 2 years ago
@rich1701 nope they need about a 7.5% swing (not taking boundry changes into account which actualy lowers this) When Liebour won in 1997 they had an 11.5% swing.
madabbafan 2 years ago
I have no swingometer... but I do remain confused when i hear pundits on news channels saying in order win, the conservatives need a larger swing than Labour achieved in 1945...
rich1701 2 years ago
We'll all hold you to that promise! Even I will concede that Gordon Brown and the Labour Party winning an outright majority is unlikely. However, there is still a not unrealistic possibility of David Cameron and the Conservative Party not having sufficient numbers to govern with an outright, working majority...
KendoSaggyknackers 2 years ago
The funny thing is that the exit polls/final opinion polls in both 1983 and 2005 were absolutely correct, but in between they made mistakes, especially in 1987 and 1992.
1983 initial BBC prediction: C majority of 146 seats (144)
2005 initial BBC prediction: Lab majority of 66 seats (66)
99.9% correct in 1983 and 100% correct in 2005.
ajs41 2 years ago
I agree they were MILES away in there 1992 prediction.
papermariob 2 years ago 2
im young & im interested in politics but most ppl my age dont care. they dont vote and probs never will. i think politics shud be taught in primary/secondary schools. itll get kids involved. run sum elections with different candidates and stuff. i wudve loved it
longlivejacko 2 years ago 45
@longlivejacko primary students would never understand, but i think having it at GCSE level would work
AlyceQuinn 1 year ago
@longlivejacko i feel the same way
StarWarsKid59 1 year ago
@longlivejacko They should teach spelling too
TheMarlinspike 1 year ago
@TheMarlinspike Fucking bully
ImPoliticalOK 1 year ago
@ImPoliticalOK Nothing wrong with maintaining educational standards. I would have thought that you, as a Tory, would have approved.
TheMarlinspike 1 year ago
@TheMarlinspike But it ain't nice what u said im sorry but also wired question do u hate bieber
ImPoliticalOK 1 year ago
@ImPoliticalOK do i hate bieber? who doesn't?
TheMarlinspike 1 year ago
@TheMarlinspike Want to join my group
WeAllHateBieber
ImPoliticalOK 1 year ago
@longlivejacko
run unbiased political education at the same time as school elections or you'll get ignorant little brats swaying elections. my school may 2010 election; libdems won with around 375 votes to 80 con, 75 lab, 71 green, all after clegg's lies + a libdem biased history teacher ran the thing + one of the libdem sixth form candidates had big knockers so the younger lads voted for her (not being bitter i actually heard that being said!)
guess who ran the labour camp there? ;D
Marnerbanana 1 year ago
I'm surprised no one's commented on how good the graphics are for 1992! One could be forgiven for mistaking this with a modern election! As soon as they cut over to the various places around the country it's obvious just how shiny and pristine that intro really was.
haku8645 2 years ago 6
tony king!!!
XxLoveIsTheDrugxX 2 years ago
being a netural to this election I am looking at CON majority 138 or more with several labour ministers losing seats
marksteelejr 2 years ago
A not entirely impossible, but merely highly unlikely outcome...
KendoSaggyknackers 2 years ago
I wish Labour won the hung parliament in 1992 because Michael Portillo would have been leader of the party after major and would have won 1997 and Blair and Brown would not of existed .
MrTORYTOM 2 years ago
in the 2010 election I believe PM Cameron will have a majority of 75-80, I believe that is possible, Labour now in 2009 was the Tories in 1996.
gopconservative78 2 years ago
could someone post all parts of this elecion. or tell me where you can get the video for the whole thing?
SuperJames357 2 years ago
This election theme is great and epic.
motzPHaragas 2 years ago 6
Lets be honest if Kinnock won 1992....they would be blown out in 1997 with the ERM under Labour. Granted I'm Conservative but the 4th win was a poison pill because if the ERM. We have been paying the price since. But 2010 will be a Tory Majority.
gopconservative78 2 years ago
No. The role that the ERM played in 1997 has been massively exagerated and in any case the reason that it hurt the Tories so much was that they had no one else to blame for it. A new labour government would have been able to benefit from the recovery and a divided tory party lead by Douglas Hurd. A labour government in its first term would have been much more united than a fag-end tory government in its fourth.
slimes23 2 years ago
So disappointed on this night - was sure they were going to get kicked out. Fucking Kinnock.
stupidjunk978 2 years ago
It would have been much better in the long run for the Tories if they had lost in 92.
Kinnock would have been a poor and unpopular PM and the Tories would have probably returned to power in 97.
Such a shame, the 12 year New Labour wrecking spree would never have happened.
antonjon1 2 years ago 4
I remember this one -- CBC Newsworld was simulcasting this in Canada. I watched the first 15 minutes at 5 pm Eastern and left home thinking Kinnock would pull off a squeaker -- when I got back and saw Major had pulled it off I was shocked. I think this one pretty much put the kibbosh on exit polls everywhere in the democratic world, you just can't rely on them as a model.
BlastFurnaceCanada 2 years ago
I remember this election as the one were the exit poll was wrong and John Major was returned to downing street.Now those who think its going to be a tory landslide in 2010 then think agian it will be close very close just as this election in 92 was
theyorkowl75 2 years ago
Perhaps. But the difference in opinion poll ratings in the 12 months leading up to said election were considerably narrower than they are now. Plus, Major was seen as the lesser of two evils. I'd suggest that although people might be unsure of Cameron they're sick to death of Brown and will vote (or abstain) acordingly. Time will tell..
Durbs75 2 years ago
I remember the 'victory rally' the Labour party held the day before poling day. I'm still convinced that it was this that cost them the election.
Still in reality this was the last election in which we had a Labour party. New Labour are just wet Tories.
madabbafan 2 years ago
Shows what you know.
NaMgKCa 2 years ago
Would it be possible to find the rest of this somewhere? Would be an interesting few hours watching.
RisingSunOfTheEast 2 years ago 2
BBC Parliament occasionally re-show an entire election nights coverage. They have recently shown the 1979 one. Summer recess is coming up so they may show a couple then.
madabbafan 2 years ago 3
Kinnock looked like a raving nutter and Major a wally. It brings back memories thanks.
'Will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights.'
Pulsar205 2 years ago
i thought this was the american election.
electricguitarplayr 2 years ago
Well we both got the best result out of them!
cjr897 2 years ago
'Fraid not. It's the Tories 4th win in a row when every poll predicted they'd lose the UK election. Thank God Kinnock never became PM.....
mts1977 2 years ago
It was only the prayers of the desperate that saved us from hard labour.
Pulsar205 2 years ago
that's when we had more money for flashier programmes
Pulsar205 2 years ago
Hung parliament? A swing and a miss! Unusual, though, to be fair...
Durbs75 2 years ago
If Kinnock had won this General election Britain wouldn't be in such a fucking mess as it is now with the Blairites and New Labour. We would never had heard of Tony Blair.
solidarity4justice 2 years ago 6
Agreed. It also shows what a mistake the Tory MPs did in throwing Thatcher out.
gleabe07 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
solidarity4justice 2 years ago
I love this version of the music - it's fully orchestral, with sweeping choirs. Rather dramatic for the likes ofJohn Major and Paddy Ashdown, though! In the run-up to the election, I wrote to Peter Snow and got a signed photograph. I was 11, and (as it was the holidays) I was allowed to stay up until 2am (which was Chris Patten losing his seat).
Schnorbs 2 years ago
Election 1992... First time I got to vote!
sheltorx 2 years ago
The 2010 will be my first. Whats the experience like?
nintendolad 2 years ago
o dear
idlevice066 2 years ago
If you don't vote Labour...you are beaten by unions
gopconservative78 2 years ago 2
Thats not what i asked, i said what is the experience like, the feeling of casting one's first vote, not what would happen if i don't vote labour.
nintendolad 2 years ago
It will be my first time as well. Can't wait.
Formula1MotorRacing 2 years ago
they place an anal probe in your arse to make sure you only vote once
gopconservative78 2 years ago
It's quite fun. one of the nice things about it is how informal it is. Just a couple of people ask your name and address and cross you off a list. They then give you a ballot paper and u mark it in a voting booth.
Not like in America where they have to check every last detail to make sure ur not black, I mean a convict. No offence to the US but I don't think they've ever organised an election properly.
slimes23 2 years ago 2
Will be my first too, cannot wait to play my part in the demolition of Labour =D
nickalbion1234 2 years ago
David Cameron will be the next Maggie Thatcher! I think the Tories will win 339-349 seats...a workable majority.
gopconservative78 3 years ago 4
Thats not a majority, thats a loss u have predicted. Look at ur figures
scotstory 3 years ago
It is a majority, the post will be at 326 in the next House of Commons.
Medeasbiggestfan 3 years ago
I don't think so. Will the country really want a stuck up toffy nosed git like him in charge? He has no policies, no carisma, no experience. The guy has never had a proper job before he entered parliament. He has been a parasite from his fathers vast wealth.
I think hung parliament with the liberals wanting PR for their support.
mrbluesky1uk 2 years ago
That comment to me shows ignorance on your part David Cameron does have policies he has unvieled plans for local gov, he is against ID card etc (watch the news, read a paper) He obviously does have charisma or he wouldnt be ahead in the polls, experience means jack look at Obama barely anything a yet he holds one of the most powerful offices in the world. As wealth most of those in parliament are public school boys Blair and Brown were Cameron is a slightly bigger public school boy!
idlevice066 2 years ago
I suppose a return to the upper class Tory toffs of the old days is better than carrying on with Gordon Brown and his cronies.
And PR wouldn't work over here. Have you seen how indecisive the population is in terms of the popular vote? You'd have tons of bloated coalition governments that would get bogged down (like in Italy or Isreal).
theredraven 2 years ago
I think the way things are going under Gordon Brown at the moment there will be a Tory landslide. Just because Cameron is upper class doesn't mean he will be a bad PM, Winston Churchill was upper class too.
aeronuk1 2 years ago 5
Why the hell would being upperclass be a detriment? Are people in the UK so envious of others' success or status that they wouldn't want to see a wealthy person in a position of power?
omgomg53 2 years ago
It's not a problem if they're wealthy from their own effort. But most of the upperclass are wealthy through inheritance, thats what people object to.
aeronuk1 2 years ago
Why would people object to that? Jealous? Shouldn't dying people be able to leave their money and personal property to whomever they wish?
omgomg53 2 years ago
Comment removed
aeronuk1 2 years ago
Yes
Svetlanka83 2 years ago
Winston Churchill was a hopeless and weak PM. A great war leader but one who was rejected three times in a row by the popular vote.
slimes23 2 years ago
I doubt he will be the next Maggie I think he is too moderate and quite cute and fluffy when it comes to social issues ..BUT he will be the next PM I think were looking at a majority of 69-80 seats at the moment. However if things continue to go south for Brown Cameron may just pull a 100 seat landslide soo fingers crossed!
idlevice066 2 years ago
for better or for worse, the next british prime minister is no doubt David Cameron, the only question is when
mttmtmtm 3 years ago 6
Latest poll shows the Conservatives have a lead of about 13 points. Excellent news, hope the lead increases.
AKLAidan 3 years ago 7
Polls change, just a month ago it was level pegging and remember the next election is more than a year away probably.
gladiator3543 3 years ago
The Tories at that rate should have a workable Majority of 65-70
gopconservative78 3 years ago
Latest is 19 point lead now! Bye Bye Nu Labour.
DAVIDCAMERONFORPM 2 years ago 5
More people voted for John Major in 1992 than they've ever voted for anyone else, before on since... 14,000,000 Brits.
artsed08 3 years ago 5
When you hear this theme tune, albeit only once every four or five years, you know you're british - kind of like our second national anthem.
antidisenstable 3 years ago
If you will!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
Prime Minister Kinnock...I rather eat shit that utter those words. Thank God the Tories won
gopconservative78 3 years ago
Oh well it will never be Prime Minister Cameron, so I guess Labour and Tories almost even, or will be when Mr Brown wins next year!
I wonder if Mr Hague will become the next Tory Leader (again) when Mr Cameron steps down on Friday 7th May 2010, when he loses the next general election?!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
To the polls right now nobody will be a majority, but I think the Tories will be the largest, however it should be noted in 2010, Labour will be tired and worn out. Its the Tories turn to win.
gopconservative78 3 years ago
This is so depressing.
slimes23 3 years ago
I vote that next time we all chip in to buy Peter Snow a decent suit that was coutured in Italy and not made in Bombay. That would make a Tory victory even sweeter. Shallow I know, but I am a Tory.
markhayo 3 years ago
I don't think there will be a Tory victory in 2010. 2015 maybe, but you watch - 2010 will be 1992 in reverse!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
Seriously, after this Jon Snow must have been so pissed off that the exit poll was so wrong. I always liked John Major, the low key grey man, but he had to play historys' runt to Thatchers' pre-eminence much as Gordon Brown is having to do now before the next big electoral swing back to Blue.
Flavio359 3 years ago
Nope not in 2010 - they may gain some seats but it will be 1992 in reverse - i.e. victory for Gordon!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
I seriously never get why in ANY country anyone wants their party to be in rule "forever". You're just ASKING for corruption and laziness if you ask me.
waltlantz 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"most famous street in the world"?
speak for yourself...
Andre2010 3 years ago
Well, I guess that claim is a BIT arrogant I suppose. Most famous street in England perhaps....
mts1977 3 years ago
That narrows it down from the entire planet to our little island. Big jump!
Georgiahulse 3 years ago
"Our little island" invented parliamentary democracy and brought about the modern world. Size doesn't matter.
artsed08 3 years ago
And doesn't it do it SO well with an un-elected head of state?
Georgiahulse 3 years ago
So what if we don't have an elected head of state.
slimes23 3 years ago
Sooo.....we can't really call ourselves a democracy when the highest figure in government is there simply for being born into that position. Presidents, no matter how well they fare, at least have to work to get to their position.
I would have thought you'd have worked that out to be honest! Mind you, as the only comment on your profile says "you're and idiot", and only an idiot would shun the importance of having a leader we can elect.
Georgiahulse 3 years ago 2
Actually, you will find that most if not all democracies have people who are unelected and yet wield much more power than our monarch. If the queen was making policy it would be a different matter. You will also find that Gerald Ford was never elected and yet was able to conduct US foreign policy on a day to day basis.
I think you are confusing the role of leader in a practical sense with that of head of state.
slimes23 3 years ago
Do their highest houses (for us, the House of Lords), comprise entirely of unelected people? Not one single member of Britain's highest court, and law making body were elected by the British people. They also have to swear to the Queen. Thankfully, some people have the courgae to stand up for freedom - as several MPs spoke out (while reading their oath), against the Queen. One once sat in her chair and said "I abolish the monarchy".
It's time we got rid of this ancient establishment.
Georgiahulse 3 years ago
As per the 1949 parliament Act, the house of commons has the ability to dominate the Lords. In any case it is an entirely seperate issue from the monarchy. You're claim that not one single member of our highest court was elected is a little strange. Are you suggesting that we should have an elected judiciary? And have you forgotten about the supreme court? A Supreme Court justice has far more power than a member of the house of Lords.
slimes23 3 years ago
Doesn't the fact that the Queen has no power just prove Georgiahulse's point? The PM's power is too great, and it needs balancing, that's why we need a President of Britain. Besides, why pend millions of taxpayers money on an eternal lame-duck head of state? It would be more cost-effective to have a republic.
053bss 3 years ago
No because the existence of a non-party political head of state prevents the PM from becoming as 'presidential' as an actual US president. If we want to balance t5he power of the PM, we should do it by strengthening parliament, not by elected another figure head.
A presidency would be far more costly than a monarchy and and would lack the advantages I've mentioned.
slimes23 3 years ago 2
Which is the most famous street in the world?
SERVANTOFSET 3 years ago
Coronation street
LiverpoolLoyal1690 3 years ago 2
Yes well ok the tories did win by 21, but much good it didn't do them in the end.
Their shambolic incompetenece led to the last 11 years of Labour rule, and counting!
Cheers guys.......
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
what it also did was killed off socialism and it made the Labour party give up everything it ever stood for..adopt tory policies and have a 'tory' in charge in Blair in order to get elected..however, just like in 1979 when Thatcher came in to clean up the economic mess that Labour had left, history is repeating itself and Cameron will have to come in and clean up the horrific mess Brown has left
steps1 3 years ago
No, the stupidity of the people of this country for voting for Nue Labore (as I call them) led to the last 11 years of shittyness.
theredraven 3 years ago
Oh right, you would have preferred a "do nothing" stagnant re-election of John Major in 1997 would you?
I hate to think what it would have been like. 1992 was bad enough!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
Ahhh i thought this was the 1992 presidential election in the united states.
boris2341 3 years ago
Vote Liberal!
lelvish1 3 years ago
Lets hope the Conservatives get back in. Lets pray I should say. True Blue forever.
tonyregan021177 3 years ago 6
Thanks for uploading i remember watching this opening as a child.
Svetlanka83 3 years ago
IN the end...Conservative Majority of 21
gopconservative94 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Never mind a Tory majority of 21 in 1992 - I prefer t0 think of 1997, 2001 and 2005 myself:
Labour majorities of 179, 167 and 67 respectively.
Happy days.........
Bigger than
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
Well, you'd better get rid of your telly in 2010, because you're not going to be a happy bunny when we all say farewell to thirteen years of New Labour.
Cannot wait!
artsed08 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't think so arts; no chance of a Tory win. You'll see that I'm right in 15 months time!
Wolverhampton1 3 years ago
Tory's lead has been cut from 25 points to 5 points.
dartaddict 3 years ago