Replying to '' jbat100's '' comment its true, she never posts games of her losing dispite claiming to. So only ever goes into blitz games, and the ones she has won then she becomes less talented at proper standard games............
Seems like that Kosteniuk has a forte in blitz,i think that blitz is also a type of game that has its meaning(very good for training) but it is not accurate to show the player's true power..I think the lowest time to consider a player's power is a fast rapid game(25 min)
women is more intelligent and higher in IQ level than man. this has been practically proven. good job Alexandra, keep beating men the so-called great chess champions.
@mautand WIKI: In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
@jbat100 Thank you jbat for explaining the meaning of troll. However, I didn't intend to post blogs just to provoke readers or to play with their emotional behaviour. I said what I saw the difference between man and woman in the late 20th and in the current century.
@ChessQueen Dear Alexandra , to understand what I said please go to wikipedia in english and give in my name : LUTZ NEWEKLOWSKY Here you can find under the title "BEAUTY IN CHESSPROBLEMS" my worldrecord mate of the year 2001 , which humans can´t understand and VISWANATHAN ANAND said : "The best player in future will be the person who will be the best in learning and sometimes in understanding what computers teach to us."
Nowadays the computers CORRECT the openings of the human chesstheory.
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
Personally I'v most likely watched all of her blitz games, and I believe she is the best pound for pound blitz player in the world.... Anyone agree???????? Opinion only..!!!
It's funny, looking up videos on kosteniuk, you would think she never loses. All the videos she makes about the games she has won against top men (incidently always in blitz where pretty much anything can happen). A quick lookup on chessgames com shows that she lost far more games than she won against men. It's good that top women compete with top men, and in blitz they can win (very rarely in classical time control though). I'd like her analyses more if they didn't portray her as invicible...
I think it is only natural that everyone, including Sasha, wants to comment on their achievements rather than losses. Otherwise would be quite a maso exercise, don't you think?:)
Actually, you learn a lot more from commented games of people who lost and analysing their mistakes than people who keep on talking about how amazingky great they are. You don't see video after video of carlsen, anand, karpov, kasparov (...) commenting their wins, if anything you see them acknowledging mistakes. Kosteniuk is a great chess player, but her attemps at making people believe that she is better than the top men is blind feminism. She lost to Carlsen in regular time when he was 15.
@bumblebee1607 Not true, one of my favorite chess players, Josh Waitzkin, commentates on many of his losses, because he feels he learned more from them even though he enjoyed winning very much.
@khingratsaphone I said in my comment "Kosteniuk is a great chess player", if you don't consider that giving her credit then you need help. My remarks still stand, she discredits herself by portraying herself as invincible.
@jbat100 well in the games she was playing (won) she was invincible, that's wny she won! But what does feminism got to do with chess, or is that what you call "giving her credit"?
@jbat100 Yes, it's an increasingly common phenomena to promote women over men, for example every science show has a woman presenting the breakthrough, quite often not the primary scientist. Child prodigy news items focus on girls.
There is a concerted effort because men are the biggest threat to the new world order as they're more physically dangerous, have higher IQs and are more likely to challenge authority, thus they must subjugate men.
Anand is distracted by her beauty - in a blitz game where time is such a concern this can cost him the match. Also, I think Kosteniuk is much better at blitz chess than standard chess.
No, actually I have revised my opinion of Kosteniuk, having studied some of her games. She is one of the few women in the world capable of playing some decent chess.
But she is one of the really FEW women who can compete with the top men. The rest of them should be cleaning up the place and serving drinks to the men.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Anad would've easily won if not for the 1 sec time delay. If you look at her clock at the very end, she actually starts gaining an extra second per move. If it would've been a real wind uo clock, she would've LOST.
Anand tenia al comienzo una pieza por 2 peones, nose ke vio... cuando hizo alfil x f7, complico la partida, pero kosteniuk se defendio bien, e incluso estuvo apurada de tiempo
ah, nice little tactic :). I don't think it's THAT amazing that they both missed it though. I think what happened was: Anand blundered (horribly). Kosteniuk on her part recognizes that she is playing the world champion and therefore trusts his calculation, concentrating on avoiding threats, not prioritizing the attacking possibilities enough and therefore misses a fairly obvious mating attack. This happens to all of us when we are defending a worse position or playing some1 higher rated.
she tore him apart.
Brulserz 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I've beaten her, got a lucky draw against kasparov and won a thriller against kramnik, . . . . .(And then i woke up!)
TEDOVSKY 4 months ago 3
Every time i see that game i think, how does she can be so good?? love you kosteniuk '-'
CristianoSperansa 6 months ago
Великолепно
Valbdemar 7 months ago
What if Anand plays b3 ?
yapanuwan 8 months ago
Replying to '' jbat100's '' comment its true, she never posts games of her losing dispite claiming to. So only ever goes into blitz games, and the ones she has won then she becomes less talented at proper standard games............
grandaduk 11 months ago
btw she lost the 1st game so the match is a 1-1 so it is a TIE /DRAW!!
Sasukekillsitachi 11 months ago
@Sasukekillsitachi .. Good to know..?
moviecritic6 9 months ago
Lol KOSTENUIK FINISHED 19thz!! LOSER haha...
Carlsen became 1st ans Anand became 2nd!
Kostenuik is a fake than only shows her wins and mostly 5 min games.
Sasukekillsitachi 11 months ago
This is blitz, not real chess guys, not worthy at all.
Sasukekillsitachi 11 months ago
Seems like that Kosteniuk has a forte in blitz,i think that blitz is also a type of game that has its meaning(very good for training) but it is not accurate to show the player's true power..I think the lowest time to consider a player's power is a fast rapid game(25 min)
RayVitoles 11 months ago
I want to see Sasha play Vishy in a standard game of chess, where they can both take more time to think. Let them play the best of six series.
RK831 1 year ago
women is more intelligent and higher in IQ level than man. this has been practically proven. good job Alexandra, keep beating men the so-called great chess champions.
mautand 1 year ago
@mautand troll detected
r4f43ll 1 year ago 4
@r4f43ll, i am sorry what do you mean by troll detected. would you like to explain?
mautand 11 months ago
@mautand WIKI: In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
jbat100 6 months ago
@jbat100 Thank you jbat for explaining the meaning of troll. However, I didn't intend to post blogs just to provoke readers or to play with their emotional behaviour. I said what I saw the difference between man and woman in the late 20th and in the current century.
mautand 6 months ago
@mautand your statement itself gives me a idea about your IQ...
yapanuwan 8 months ago
@yapanuwan do you want to set a chess match of only 2 minutes with 0 increment time? I will tell u what is my IQ level.
mautand 6 months ago
@mautand chess skills ≠ IQ
yapanuwan 6 months ago 2
@yapanuwan Yes it is, because Bobby Fischer's IQ, who was world chess champion, was detected 180. 180 IQ is above normal level.
mautand 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yapanuwan so now you know what is my IQ?
mautand 5 months ago
Dear SassyJay2 , you find my worldrecords not only on wikipedia but also also here on youtube under the following word : NEWEKLOWSKY
Here you can see the worldrecordprogression from 1889 to 2010
kindly regards from Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
@ChessQueen Dear Alexandra , to understand what I said please go to wikipedia in english and give in my name : LUTZ NEWEKLOWSKY Here you can find under the title "BEAUTY IN CHESSPROBLEMS" my worldrecord mate of the year 2001 , which humans can´t understand and VISWANATHAN ANAND said : "The best player in future will be the person who will be the best in learning and sometimes in understanding what computers teach to us."
Nowadays the computers CORRECT the openings of the human chesstheory.
Moremover 1 year ago
@Moremover I looked it up and saw nothing to do with record mate perhaps you could post a direct link?
SassyJay2 1 year ago
Kosteniuk sucks
speedBOX34 1 year ago
funny thing is, Anand finished 2nd, kosteniuk is last... and 19 year old Carlsen is Champion! i'm scared of this guy
cesarghan 1 year ago
They both played way too slow after the opening.
mikeusat 1 year ago
Kosteniuk is a great chess player but she should try and practice a little bit of yoga!
noxtradamentus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
gatobuiles 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
gatobuiles 1 year ago
Anad no termino de jugar la partida debido a que es un jugador de ajedrez en todo el sentido de la palabra; puesto que hubiese podido haber presionado a la jugadora Kosteniuk por tiempo a pesar del incremento, pero sus buenos valores lo llevo a ceder de buena forma.
gatobuiles 1 year ago
alexendra z good 2 masterbate on
MrBanderker 1 year ago
Why did anand give theirs pieces? He was a piece up with a better position i don't understand how he can lose this
Kidaman1000 1 year ago
who all bloody guys coughing there???
shivam5315 1 year ago
That was the shortest applaud i have ever seen/heard >_<
rackzor 1 year ago
Personally I'v most likely watched all of her blitz games, and I believe she is the best pound for pound blitz player in the world.... Anyone agree???????? Opinion only..!!!
SchradMaster 1 year ago
@SchradMaster She's a woman, she's lighter.
:P
halfassedfart 1 year ago
she's pretty. i wouldn't mind losing to her ;)
mattfca 1 year ago
surely dis isn't the day for anand
aceNdiamond 1 year ago
is she lose because the time
theloverpharoah7 1 year ago
It's funny, looking up videos on kosteniuk, you would think she never loses. All the videos she makes about the games she has won against top men (incidently always in blitz where pretty much anything can happen). A quick lookup on chessgames com shows that she lost far more games than she won against men. It's good that top women compete with top men, and in blitz they can win (very rarely in classical time control though). I'd like her analyses more if they didn't portray her as invicible...
jbat100 1 year ago 32
I think it is only natural that everyone, including Sasha, wants to comment on their achievements rather than losses. Otherwise would be quite a maso exercise, don't you think?:)
bumblebee1607 1 year ago 5
Actually, you learn a lot more from commented games of people who lost and analysing their mistakes than people who keep on talking about how amazingky great they are. You don't see video after video of carlsen, anand, karpov, kasparov (...) commenting their wins, if anything you see them acknowledging mistakes. Kosteniuk is a great chess player, but her attemps at making people believe that she is better than the top men is blind feminism. She lost to Carlsen in regular time when he was 15.
jbat100 1 year ago 2
@jbat100 in her defense Carlsen is a BEAST in chess
Extramark9 1 year ago
@bumblebee1607 Not true, one of my favorite chess players, Josh Waitzkin, commentates on many of his losses, because he feels he learned more from them even though he enjoyed winning very much.
s0ulofblood 1 year ago 3
she has the right to brag about anything if she can beat anand and all the other grandmaster (men)! give her some credit douchbag!
khingratsaphone 1 year ago
@khingratsaphone I said in my comment "Kosteniuk is a great chess player", if you don't consider that giving her credit then you need help. My remarks still stand, she discredits herself by portraying herself as invincible.
jbat100 1 year ago
@jbat100 well in the games she was playing (won) she was invincible, that's wny she won! But what does feminism got to do with chess, or is that what you call "giving her credit"?
khingratsaphone 1 year ago
@jbat100 lol women
shaioliver 1 year ago
@jbat100 How many losses do you think are included in Anand's collection of his best games?
fulmar 1 year ago
@jbat100 shameless self promotion is the pinnacle of achievement or better put. Don't put yourself down you will only fail moar.
verified2 1 year ago
@jbat100 She may indeed prefer to show her winning games, which is only logical!
but she does comment on her defeats aswell!
RoelGeurtsen 1 year ago 3
@jbat100 Yes, it's an increasingly common phenomena to promote women over men, for example every science show has a woman presenting the breakthrough, quite often not the primary scientist. Child prodigy news items focus on girls.
There is a concerted effort because men are the biggest threat to the new world order as they're more physically dangerous, have higher IQs and are more likely to challenge authority, thus they must subjugate men.
pixarian72 1 year ago
@jbat100 Exactly
SRDTL 3 months ago
Anand is distracted by her beauty - in a blitz game where time is such a concern this can cost him the match. Also, I think Kosteniuk is much better at blitz chess than standard chess.
Geprodis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
women < men
KanoneUnteralle 2 years ago
She should be cleaning up the place instead.
lightening777 2 years ago
You really have a very small brain don't you.
Finalhour100 2 years ago
No, actually I have revised my opinion of Kosteniuk, having studied some of her games. She is one of the few women in the world capable of playing some decent chess.
But she is one of the really FEW women who can compete with the top men. The rest of them should be cleaning up the place and serving drinks to the men.
lightening777 2 years ago
Thanks for the video!
GiorgeiX 2 years ago
Very nice but, Kosteniuk could be a little more polite and thank the applause? not just leave...
comosera 2 years ago
He did this on purpose? Like he did in last chapmionatship with Kramnik, when he lose teatraly few matches
WeatherShine 2 years ago
Kosteniuk I love you
DidierAdebayor 2 years ago
Diego Garces love her much better. She born him daugther.
WeatherShine 2 years ago
I think it's very impressive how she pressured him with the timedeficency she had - well done!
cellQ 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anad would've easily won if not for the 1 sec time delay. If you look at her clock at the very end, she actually starts gaining an extra second per move. If it would've been a real wind uo clock, she would've LOST.
dfwtexxaas 2 years ago
Actually, the game is played '3+2', ie, you are supposed to get 2 seconds increment per move.
That's usual for most top-level blitz games.
PMilet 2 years ago 3
nicely done indeed
TheSkysYourLimit 2 years ago
i would have been so bummed by that glare on the board. draw the drapes! please jesus christ!
balleslyng 2 years ago
Kosteniuk is so cool.
Geprodis 2 years ago
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. e4 Bb4 6. Bg5 c5 7. e5 cxd4 8. Qa4+ Nc6 9. O-O-O Bd7 10. Ne4 Be7 11. exf6 gxf6 12. Bh4 e5 13. Bxc4 a6 14. Qb3 Na5 15. Bxf7+ Kf8 16. Qd3 Bb5 17. Qd2 Kxf7 18. Qh6 Qc8+ 19.
Kb1 Qf5 20. Rhe1 Bc6 21. Ka1 Bxe4 22. Nxd4 exd4 23. Rxd4 Rad8 24. Ra4 Nc6 25.
g4 Qxg4 26. f3 Qg6 27. Qf4 Bc2 28. Rc4 Bd3 29. Rcc1 Rhe8 30. Qc7 Ne5 31. Qxb7
Rd7 32. Qb3+ Kf8 33. Bg3 Qf7 34. Qa4 Bb5 35. Qe4 Nd3 36. Rg1 Bc5 37. Qh4 Bxg1
38. Rxg1 Ne5 39. Bf4 Ng6 40. Bh6+ Kg8 41. Qb4 Red8
GiorgeiX 2 years ago 22
why have you written all the moves? that must have taken ages...
balleslyng 2 years ago
Just to let people copy-and-paste them into programs that replay and analyse the match with easiness.
GiorgeiX 2 years ago
lol, he's probabely just copied them..
cellQ 2 years ago
@GiorgeiX 23....Nb3+ 24. axb3 qa5+ 25. ra4 Qxe1+ 26 Ka2 Qb1# Kosteniuk missed this lovely combination
zachattack661 1 year ago
@zachattack661 You are right, but the excitement was probably the main character of the game. Nice question to be asked to Alexandra...
GiorgeiX 1 year ago
yeah anand is far from invincible
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
Well it's blitz;
but the whole Qb3 & Bf7 maneuver just didn't "smell" good ;)
PMilet 2 years ago
So much for what Fischer said about female chess players!
thisguyheisaguy 2 years ago 5
Teach me how to play Alexandra ???
emadmadi 2 years ago 3
Alexandra has written numerous books on chess that you can read. Also she has made dvd's and commented games on youtube.
Ruxistico 2 years ago
Anand tenia al comienzo una pieza por 2 peones, nose ke vio... cuando hizo alfil x f7, complico la partida, pero kosteniuk se defendio bien, e incluso estuvo apurada de tiempo
AdamoLuisPeru 2 years ago
Aaaah, this was sweet! Bravo Alexandra!!
oxiigen 2 years ago
Anand thought he was going to have a field day, he played without respect for her and he was duly punished. Nice manouevre Qc8-f5!
cellardoor70 2 years ago
womens world champion beats men's world champion.
Ruxistico 2 years ago
Wow! Kosteniuk, despite her rating, is one to never underestimate!
What a tremendous feat by Alexandra!
Thymonico 2 years ago
Excellent
Do you have Carlsen - Kosteniuk ?
goldenexecutive 2 years ago
Its amazing what these great players miss when they play blitz. At 6.54 Kosteniuk would have won straight away with Kt b3 check.
capachip 2 years ago 2
yes...after 1...Kb3+, 2. axb3. Then 2...Qa5#, 3. Ra4 Qxe1+ leads to a clear win, unless I am mistaken.
loveblacktually 2 years ago
You are right !
After 23. Rxd4 it is a forced mate.
Nb3+ 24. axb3 Qa5+ 25. Ra4
Qxe1+ 26. Ka2 Qb1#
So, Kosteniuk was 0:25 vs Anand´s 0:49....
goldenexecutive 2 years ago
ah, nice little tactic :). I don't think it's THAT amazing that they both missed it though. I think what happened was: Anand blundered (horribly). Kosteniuk on her part recognizes that she is playing the world champion and therefore trusts his calculation, concentrating on avoiding threats, not prioritizing the attacking possibilities enough and therefore misses a fairly obvious mating attack. This happens to all of us when we are defending a worse position or playing some1 higher rated.
Ruxistico 2 years ago
Anand lost... There is no way of surviving the checkmate in two moves.
slymnlts 2 years ago
May be I´m missing something but i didn´t see a two-move-mate position in the whole game.
goldenexecutive 2 years ago
wow.. anand lost?
246trinitrotoluene 2 years ago
thanks! great!
will you post some of the games of tha final day?
Anand-Carlsen would be great!
ballespark666 2 years ago
Thank you once again.
ceeforic 2 years ago