Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (106)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Romney or Ron Paul will beat obama

  • Sarah should have run. She was the only one who could beat Obama. I was mad as heck when she led us who supported her on till the very end. I don't like Cain's 999 plan because it would only add to more taxes in the future. I don't like Perry because of the way he attacks those in his own party. Backmann is too weak. Mitt is our only choice. I would have liked a Palin/Trump or Palin/Mitt ticket. Either one could beat Obama hands down and could get the financial support.

  • @gotowork1

    You actually think Palin could have beaten Obama? Most people *still* think of Palin as nothing but an idiot.

  • @DreamWorldwide Because she is an idiot.

  • Herman Cain is right, the weirdo working class on Wall St protesting are criminals. This is class warfare and those opposing the Banks and Wall St need to be put in their proper place. Let us all say Amen!

  • You're disgusting.....how did it feel to get rejected by Sarah Palin after your creepy advances you dickhead?

  • @peterharrisonzx6r

    One could respond to you, "You shouldn't have run over that 3rd grader, man. That was really messed-up," but of course, we'd be twisting reality to make such an accusation, as you have probably never done anything of that sort. There's a point to be made here, if you pay attention.

  • Barry will not win, you say Cain has no experience, so what Barry doesn't either, he is sooo incompetent, its embarrassing to see Barry trying to wing it, Barry Governs like a he pitches a baseball, most people with any sense of self worth would not "Shame himself, the barry does, I think Perry will come back, he's doing the rope adope, why be a front runner, with over a year & half out !

    Prediction LAND SLIDE, you have no idea how much barry is not liked, thats word to the motherland...

  • Another commentator using Hegelian Dialect to divide us, distract us from what is really going on. Zionists all of them. Your commentators politicians, Vatican, Satinists, socialists, marxists, TV, radio, colleges newspapers, magazines, ALL ZIONISTS CONTROLLED BY THE MOSSAD. New World Order. why do you think demorats and republiscammers only agree on ONE THAT IS ONE topic? It is Israel period dot bingo. Go read Timeline of the Rothchilds @ I am the witness dot com

  • Man, people seem to just love to come around and slam John Ziegler. It must just be fun; I don't know. But they usually seem to lack any substance. JZ may over-react at times, but that doesn't invalidate what he's actually saying. This guy's about the *ONLY* person in the entirety of the media (if his current position even qualifies as media) whom I can trust to tell things as he actually sees them. So okay, get all offended if you want; the man still knows what he's talking about.

  • Well, Zig, there were a lot of people who said Ronald Reagan wasn't electable.

    Besides being a true Conservative, Herman Cain is a very intelligent man, contrary to Harry 'Dayo' Bellafonte's opinion. I am certain that, should he get nominated, he would surround himself with excellent advisors and would ready himself to debate Obama. Have a little faith man, and lend your support for Cain. You are way too negative!

  • HERMAN CAIN 2012!

  • I disagree with Mr. Ziegler. The media's attack on Mr. Cain would likely be based on one of two issues: race or conservatism. Any race base attack on Cain would be equally applicable to Obama. Any conservatism based attack would be equally effective against any conservative candidate. Bottom line: Mr Cain is less of a target for the media than Romney but unlike Romney, Mr. Cain can be trusted to govern conservatively.

  • @originaldoubleh

    Do you know how the media really operates in cases like these? The same criteria don't apply with those .... people. Watch Media Malpractice, and remember how much attention Alan Keyes got when he was running. Black conservatives with what may be seen as extreme beliefs are unfortunately pretty doomed from the start. Electability shouldn't be the only consideration in nominating a candidate, but it should at least be one of them. I like Cain, but he probably can't beat Obama.

  • John, you've really lost all relevance now. Sure...elect Romney because he's the best shot at beating Obama. That was the same thinking that game us the last two warm bodies...Bob Dole and John McCain. What a dud. Seriously...find something to do with your time and quit wasting ours.

  • The media has no credibility anymore. Obama is done.

  • @PatriotInChief wait until you see what they do to cain before you say something like that. the public is largely ignorant and gullible and cain's 999 plan will be easy prey for the media.

  • @PatriotInChief Herman Cain and the right wing media have even less if you think Cain is the man

  • I think you right about the media. They pushed Perry on us and some are still trying. He was horrible and GOP pundits acted like he was great. Rush was behind this. It has to be Romney. He can win guys, wake up, I don't want Obama for 4 more years.

  • @Diskopopjunkie Are you aware that it was Romney who sent his advisors to Obama in order to advise him on Obama-care? If Romney gets the nomination, you know the Dems are going to nail him on this! I do not want this RINO in the White House! He is sleezy and cannot be trusted to govern conservatively!

  • @fatdanios Perry talking points. I don't care. Romney is getting rid of the Obamacare. Case close!!!!! Romney can win.  Cain or Perry, NO WAY IN HELL.

  • @fatdanios

    Unfortunately, that may still be the only shot we've got. Hopefully it won't lose too many conservatives and will at least take some tiny fraction of Obama's votes. People say how they don't want a RINO, but that doesn't mean Perry can step up or that Cain has a chance at all. We just don't have anyone truly inspiring in the running right now, and unfortunately, pretty much anyone in elected office is sleazy. I think you have to be in order to stay in office for very long.

  • John,

    You NEED to be reporting on the blatant media BLACKOUT on Ron Paul. You will be a complete HYPOCRITE if you don't cover this as you will be actively participating in media malpractice yourself.

    Herman Cain proved himself a liar in the last debate, just search Herman Cain Caught Lying in youtube

    Mr. Ziegler I CHALLANGE you to not perpetuate the media malpractice against Ron Paul. You should make a movie about this REAL media malpractice.

    BLACK THIS OUT DOT COM

  • They Pushed Perry on us, and now Cain. This is redic!!!

  • I dont like it John! i dont want to hear it, but you make an excellent point in this video. My husband said the same thing. Cain cannot beat Obama! I told him he is increasing in the polls, but he thinks the polls are beling manipulated in order for us to think he is surging when in fact Cain will draw out more of the black vote and untimately re-elect Obama. I want Cain to win! I'll stay in my bliss just a little longer please... =(

  • Romney can win, Cain cannot win! GOP needs to get in line or we will lose lose and lose.

  • The blacks will vote for Herman Cain or else they will stay home as for what Obama has done for them. They are in the same economic boat as is the rest of the nation. The ones that do vote will vote for Herman Cain as we now will have a 100% black running against a mulatto. That is why the likes of Sharpton, Jackson, Cornell West, etc are afraid of Herman Cain as he will bring the brainwashed blacks off the reservation, thereby, limited their power over the black community.

  • @iao69 Cain will get 15% of the blacks, that does nothing!

  • Here's a group of Democrats wanting a primary challenge to Obama. (even Barbara Lee)

    primaryobamanow(com)com/obama-­promised-hope-and-change-deliv­ered-betrayals-and-attacks-on-­his-own-base/#more-130

  • Time will tell John. I hope you are wrong, we need an American heading our government. Not an American Politician. IMHO

  • John,

    You could be correct in your analysis. However, I don't believe it will make a difference and here is why:

    The puppet masters will ONLY allow their candidate to be elected NO MATTER what. Through fraud or rigging voting machines or whatever...

    Until we bring down the infrastructure of the shadow government we will never restore this Republic to the founders original intent, which was for all of us to truly live free of intervention of anyone and everyone as long as we don't hurt some

  • So we should not support the best candidates because they might not win? This kind of cynicism is killing this country.

  • Plus, I'm sorry, but I don't think Romney is the one to beat Obama, as unfortunately his Mormon faith is already creating a problem Christians. That, plus Romneycare.

    Here's an article from the Black community: blackagendareport(com)com/cont­ent/freedom-rider-occupy-wall-­street-denounce-democrats

  • But wait a minute Rush Limbaugh keeps telling me that the liberal media wants Romney to win because they can take him down by tieing him to wall street. Why does conservative radio keep telling me that it's Romney the media wants. Personally I think John is dead right. Cain cannot win the election and it would make more sense they would want Cain then Romney. Also can everyone bashing Romney please explain to me where in any of the his debates or proposals he is promoting big Government?

  • @auteur55 Romney-care+Obama-care=Big Government.

  • Also, um, the audio sync is a bit off?

  • Mr. Ziegler is more of a libertarian than a conservative. I don't mean this as a criticism, but that was one of his taglines from his radio show. "More libertarian than conservative, more conservative than liberal, but more cynical and skeptical than anything else." I miss his show. (I'm a soc-con, so Mr. Ziegler doesn't particularly like my kind, heh. He still had a great show.)

  • He didn'. He said he would thoroughly vet them. Secondly, Ulsterman's WH Insider has already said that a second term for Obama si "not an option". The Democrats do not want Obama as their candidate.

    theulstermanreport(com)com/201­1/10/09/wall-street-insider-ob­ama-2012-re-election-not-an-op­tion/

  • Where do you get these "facts" and beleive that you even have a stand on this? You are sorely misguided Mr. Ziegler...sorry, but you're just plain wrong!

  • I'm for Herman Cain because he's not a politician and he's conservative. Mitt Romney is way too liberal and is for big Government. John get back to fly over country and you will find massive opposition to the current President. The economy is going to pot, so it's time to fire the current President as well as his entire Party! Vote Right Throw the Liberals out!

  • I disagreed with you on Palin, but agree with you about 80 percent on Cain. Cain would probably LOSE Black votes for the GOP ("Uncle Tom" mindset), would definitely lose White votes and the potential for expanding GOP reach into the far Right, and would generally hand an ideological victory to PC, Affirmative Action, and White Liberal Guilt. The only qualification Cain has for the Presidency is his skin color; other than that, he is less qualified than the Great Black Hope was in 2008.

  • You have finally cracked John , Im sorry you need a vacation

    

  • sad fact ,blacks do not want to give up the victim class role as do other so called minorities because it pays off one way or another,hopefully im wrong but i think obama will be re-elected p.s i like you video cemmentary,i have very little patience for reading...and spelling as you can tell

  • sad fact ,blacks do not want to give up the victim class role as do other so called minorities because it pays off one way or another,hopefully im wrong but i think obama will be re-elected

  • I can't understand how so many people don't think it's possible that Herman Cain can beat Obama... Look at Obama's record! Look at the last 3yrs. For crying out loud, he has nothing to run on and his repetitive rhetoric is so easily recognized that he's starting to look like a complete fool. Herman Cain's the only man with a plan, and it's a plan that'll work. He's the only one up on that stage who's a Constitutional Conservative and not afraid to say what needs to be said. He has my vote.

  • @polidiotic No Republican can beat Obama because the media will eviscerate the nominee through their usual underhanded tactics, while ignoring all of Obama's blunders and failures. And if the election is close, the Democrats will cheat and steal the election. Face it, we're stuck with him until 2016. Our only chance to fight back is with a Republican congress to keep him in check.

  • @MonkDarkfyre Did you miss the November 2010 elections, when Conservatives won a landslide victory? Obama doesn't stand a chance. Elmer Fudd could beat this hack, UNLESS they cheat, which is a great possibility. You have to have been paying attention to the polls over the last 3 yrs. Obama's popularity is dwindling. The people are awake... they know what's going on and mainstream liberal media is losing their voice. Their rhetoric will continue to fall on deaf ears, in increasing numbers.

  • @polidiotic I hope you're right. But I don't think you are. We'll just have wait and see.

  • @MonkDarkfyre Have faith, brother. We can win this thing... we just have to remain eternally vigilant.

  • Oh, come on John. You make it seem like Conservatives are after a certain segment of the population, based on race, religion, etc. Maybe Republicans are, but Conservatives are pushing legislation and marketing themselves to Americans, as a whole. You either like it or you don't, and this country IS center-right, despite what the media would have you believe.

    Romney would be 2012's John McCain, who didn't win. We need a real Conservative up on that stage... not an establishment hack.

  • Hey, John. Longtime fan and I miss hearing your radio show. I agree with you on most issues, but have to disagree with you now. As unpopular as Obama might appear to be, NONE of the Republican candidates can beat him. The mainstream media will see to that. And if Romney (or Perry) get the nomination, I'll either sit home or vote for Obama (just so I can prove I'm not racist). I hope the Republicans can get their act together by 2016.

  • @MonkDarkfyre Bad move... even if they're both RINOs and liberals in their own way. They're far better than the alternative. We have a duty to this country, in order to protect it from its' enemies... both within and without. Obama has proven to be an enemy to the majority of the people of this great nation, in addition to the founding documents and freedoms they protect...

  • Comment removed

  • @MonkDarkfyre EVERY vote matters... How many people do you think say the same thing you do? "My vote won't matter." I've heard that from so many people throughout my life... so many wasted votes. Voting is your right and one duty to your country... one that many other countries do not get. Exercise that right!

    I hope to God that we get a real Conservative nominated to run against Obama (my choice is Cain), but if that doesn't happen, the others are still a better option than a Marxist.

  • @MonkDarkfyre I must have missed his religion speech. What did Romney say about religion? I know his was attacked, per usual... and honestly, what difference does the religion make, so long as the teachings of that religion are not to commit jihad, wipe a people/country off the planet, or injure/harm you in any way, but instead teach lessons of morality, ethics, and general good?

  • @polidiotic I'm paraphrasing, but in his big 'religion' speech (back in 2008) he said that no candidate for office should be rejected over their religious beliefs. OK, so far, so good. But then he continued, "Just so long as they're a person of faith." Oh, so since I don't believe in any of the bogus, made-up religions, he considers me unacceptable to hold office. Screw him and his cult religion with holy underwear! BTW, I'm NOT an atheist.

  • @MonkDarkfyre The leader of the free world MUST be a person of faith. This country's freedoms are based on the premise that there's something greater than all of us, greater than any government, and all things. If we have another leader, who thinks the government determines and controls which rights should or should not be inalienable rights, we're in for a lot more hurt than we are today. A belief in God, assures that the leader of this government understands our inalienable rights.

  • @polidiotic Faith is no more than an abandonment of reason. Believing in something in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Why do so many people think that's a positive thing? It's a sign of a weak mind. I have my own beliefs; I didn't adopt any of the idiotic, made-up religions that too many other people follow. Yet to people like you (and Romney), that's consider bad. So be it.

  • @MonkDarkfyre Some would argue that it is unreasonable to believe that there is no God. What came before the Big Bang? What's the missing link, if any link at all, in Evolution? What was the spark that created life on Earth? There is no overwhelming evidence to negate the idea of God. In fact, many things in the Bible are archaeologically sound, and more evidence in support of what happened in the bible is uncovered on a daily basis, thanks to Biblical Archaeology.

  • @polidiotic I never disputed the concept of an intelligence (creator, if you will) responsible for initiating the things that led us to this moment. What I object to are the BS man-made religions (all of them) that command us how to live our lives. And just because I'm skeptical and don't blindly believe in something that can't be proved or disproved, I'm considered the one with a problem. Believe in whatever you want, but don't malign those of us who think differently than the majority.

  • @MonkDarkfyre And if not a belief in God... then a belief that we are not Gods, and humans cannot be trusted to govern themselves... so we are endowed with natural rights, passed on to us from a greater being/nature. It is that belief that protects us from tyranny. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written on this basis.

  • @polidiotic There is no mention of 'God' in either the Constitution or Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence mentions 'Creator,' which can mean almost anything. Most of the Founding Fathers were Deists who were trying to get away from a theocracy.

  • @MonkDarkfyre You are absolutely wrong... Read up on the Founders, don't just believe what you're told. Read their own words. Even Franklin believed in a God. George Washington was grounded by his Christian Faith, just as Thomas Jefferson and many of the other founding fathers. "Creator" cannot be taken to mean "almost anything." It means just what it says... "the creator." In other words, it means God... Re: The Constitution; it mentions "year of our Lord" (Christ).

  • @MonkDarkfyre For the record, the Declaration of Independence specifically mentions "nature's God," and the Constitution uses the phrase "Year of our Lord" (a direct Christian reference).

  • I think media is smart enough to know that if ocrapa got re-elected it own't matter much when the country and economy is destroyed even more. ocrapa will run this country, along with the media into the ground. email ended due to lack of trust. - I believe you are wrong. - PS: Palin didin't turn on her supporters. I do not remember her saying she Would Run. I did hope she would, even though she would have had an almost impossible battle. She didn't and we will never know if this was her time!

  • we have to discourage black voters, let's get started

  • The only problem i have with this video is that the audio isn't sync'd up.

  • Umm, Ron Paul's batting average is way higher than Romney and Cain's combined. A little love for someone who ACTUALLY supports liberty? ( :

  • @jaimekid2 : Rupaul is a nutjob when it comes to foreign policy. He's one of those freaks that thinks 9-11 was America's fault. Anyone that stupid doesn't deserve to live in the USA let alone be it's president. Fortunately, he doesn't have a chance at being president, as he's nearly bottom of the list. But as freakish as he is, he'd still be better than the marxist filth that's polluting the white house today.

  • @eimb1999 Ad hominem attacks: nutjob freaks stupid freakish Count: 4 Logical reasoning? Not too much. How some facts: The United States government keeps the American people from having guns. The United States government takes people's land forcibly using eminent domain. The United States government throws people in jail for not giving it money. I think we have more to worry about here than abroad.
  • @jaimekid2 : You may be right but his illogic regarding America's place in the world disqualifies him from being president and representative of the country (located in a world with over a hundred countries) which he would therefore represent. And quit hiding behind the "ad hominem" crap. Who cares. I will attack anyone who is dangerous to the well being of the USA. Oh, and BTW I'm not even American. I'm Canadian, and I think I know even more about your country than you do.

  • @jaimekid2 : However, I will admit that Rupaul has a lot of good points domestically and he's STILL be a thousand times better than the filth that is polluting the white house today. Obama is the biggest disaster that's ever happened to the country that he hates. Deliberately so too. I think we can all agree on that.

  • People need to realize that most people on the conservative side of things, are in this for the money. And absolutely the conservative media makes more money, while complaining about the left. The left-main-stream media has been making more money for decades off of the liberals who get into office.

    Debra...

    "Informing Christians" Journalist

  • I was never a Palin supporter, but we can't afford a moderate if we want to roll back the damage Obama has done. I was in the Cain camp 18 months ago because he was the best candidate, and if he can't win a general election because the media would destroy him, then the country is lost anyway.

  • So, what's the difference if 110% American blacks show up to vote for Obama, and conservatives stay home (again) because they can't get excited over a Rommey? I think I'd rather stay in the trenches and fight along side of Herman Cain.

  • I too was also a huge Palin supporter, and yet as a lifelong strategist - even though I wanted Palin to enter the race, I am certain that Cain will do much better then Palin could have in the general election.... Cain will beat Obama, and I am now 100% onboard with him........ The 100% Black turnout your worried about is actually wonderful! You do not give african american voters enough credit.

  • John recently got jilted by Sarah. I always liked his commentary but he has shown himself to be more of an Idealist (NF) than the Rational (NT) I thought he was.....

    This commentary has no rational coherence. Take a cold shower john, and get over Sarah, you dont have any more jobs to lose.........

  • I agree with you, John. I really like Cain, but I don't think he can beat Obummer. He just can't. Newt is the smartest of the bunch, but it's going to be Romney.

  • WRONG WRONG WRONG.Cain would beat Obama

  • @JohnZiegler I couldn't even get through your whole video, sorry. Herman Cain?! Defender of the Federal Reserve? NeoCon schill? John, there was a time when I looked up to you. That time has passed, unfortunately. It began to end when it became clear to me that your infatuation with Sarah Palin had distracted you from the real issues, even though she was treated unfairly by the media.

    The only real choice we have for a non-bought Conservative/Libertarian is CLEARLY Ron Paul!

  • I have heard that the FOX cable news media wants Romney and so does the R party...so they are working together to help him. Cain is not being taken seriously, unfortunately. I think he is a wonderful change to the political process. It is unfortunate that the R party will not look at him seriously, since that is who the general public wants...

  • you seem to have a knack about politics, I remember you back in the k f I days, will see what happens

  • You are making it out like all conservative media are hypocrites as to what they actually believe. That they will give up their values for 4 more years of Obama. I just have a hard time believing that statement. Are you saying all the positions conservatives take on TV are only for show?

  • @ace8842 not all, just most. I will say more on this as time goes on. hope things are well in bucks county.

  • @talktozig You know, after seeing the debate the other night, you are probably right. Cain didn't have a great night and Romney looked far more polished. Cain didn't fully answer some questions about his 999 plan and I wonder about him on foreign policy. I want a real conservative, but I may just have to hold my nose and vote for Romney. I want Obamacare and Frank/Dodd gone and this may be our only chance. Bucks County is great-how Bucks votes is often indicative of how the nation will vote

  • I fail to see how anyone can say Obama will be re-elected for sure with a 42% approval rating...and dropping. I think the news media would have to be more careful with Cain, because he isn't the same old, white conservative they usually beat up on. They don't want to be portrayed as racist. Cain would whip Obama in a debate, and I also think he'd take 20% of the black vote, which will be a lot less than in was in 2008.  Republicans have a lot more history against Obama now than in 2008.

  • A word of advice John: SAVE YOUR MONEY, because any debate that Cain chooses to have with Pres. Obama will result in embarrassment for Cain. This guy knows NOTHING about foreign policy not to mention the fact that his 999 plan is seriously flawed. WHOEVER goes up against Obama will lose. Obama could beat any Republican in a debate even on a BAD day. Remember where you heard it.

  • I think youre wrong in your deductions. The 2008 elections had the largest Black voter turn out in a generation and 95% of the black vote went to obama. so if you were a black republican you either were in the 5% or you didnt vote. The economy is in the tank. if youre unemployed and suffering why are u going to rush out and vote for obama. i believe the numbers of blacks voting for obama will actually drop and cain would take 30% of the black vote. Cain would beat obama.

  • @MrOlu1981 you are exactly right, why would you vote for Obama when he has said "screw you I'll do what I want" to all americans. He wants one world government and sharia law. Don't know if I spelled sharia right and don't much care as long you know what i'm talking about. He wants every american relying on government so they can be controlled.

  • Careful, this guy is no conservative. He became a confidant of Sarah Palin and turned on her when he couldn't get a job. Here he is again bashing another true conservative.

  • @Aquatichunter1 I'm not a conservative? I turned on sara palin? seriously? the reality is that I am one of the very few conservatives in the media who is not a sell out and palin turned on her supporters, I just told it like it is. John Ziegler

  • @talktozig : Palin turned on her supporters? How so????

  • @eimb1999 I know, right? I was excited about seeing Ziegler's movie, but after the last couple of updates I was horrified at his sudden change. I don't know what happened, but it has really turned me off.

  • @talktozig As one of her supporters and fans, she didn't turn on me Brother. She still speaks the conservative message despite attacks against her that you and I can only have nightmares about. I like you, we exchanged personal emails when you were fired from KFI but you can't speak like one of the RINOs and still claim to be conservative without getting called out on it. Romney is no conservative and if you want another McCain I can't disagree with you more.

  • @Aquatichunter1 I don't think so.

  • John , you have called all the previous elections better than anyone else in politics so I am going to give your words a lot of weight this time around , until I can find someone smarter than your self.

    .

  • Great to hear your voice on politics again John. Your articles have always been fascinating but it's excellent to hear your thoughts straight from your mouth. Question though, when and where did Cain say he wouldn't allow Muslims in his Cabinet?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more