You are completely correct. See "Reasoning about Assassinations", which I presented at Cambridge and published in a peer-reviewed international journal.
Tink's wrong. There's no "innocent" explanation for the following:
Fact: the bullet hole in JFK's shirt is 4" below the bottom of the collar.
Fact: the bullet hole in JFK's suit coat is 4.125" below the bottom of the collar.
Sinister fact: the Single Bullet Theory requires JFK to have been shot in the back of the neck, a good 3 inches above the location of the holes in his clothes.
What is Tink's "innocent" explanation? A multi-inch movement of JFK's clothing that Tink can't replicate!
I wonder if he's still impotent.
Nolevaux8 3 weeks ago
You are completely correct. See "Reasoning about Assassinations", which I presented at Cambridge and published in a peer-reviewed international journal.
jamesjfetzerfetzer 3 months ago
Tink's wrong. There's no "innocent" explanation for the following:
Fact: the bullet hole in JFK's shirt is 4" below the bottom of the collar.
Fact: the bullet hole in JFK's suit coat is 4.125" below the bottom of the collar.
Sinister fact: the Single Bullet Theory requires JFK to have been shot in the back of the neck, a good 3 inches above the location of the holes in his clothes.
What is Tink's "innocent" explanation? A multi-inch movement of JFK's clothing that Tink can't replicate!
105Cliff 3 months ago
@105Cliff good points there, Cliff-- and there are many more as well.
drwaynejfk 3 months ago
@105Cliff not sure if youre serious. is this a joke?
JonnyRingo84 3 months ago
I love the way he says "Forget it man."
EGarrett01 3 months ago