Honestly this guy is right, there needs to be an investigate of what really happened on September 11. How did building 7 fall when it was 100 yards away from the twin towers?? I don't get that! There must've been demolition devices used to cause that.
What I don't get is that if it was indeed a small group of people who planted charges (Explosive or Goldschmidt /aluminothermicly based) wouldn't at least 1 slip up someday at a bar etc. or be overcome by guilt and therefore be compelled to spill the truth?
Yeah sure. I use that as a pickup line a lot. "Hey Baby, why don't you come back to my place and I'll tell you about how I blew up the World Trade Center and killed 3000 people." The thing is, they don't believe you.
@ctcole77 The information on the WTC7 transfer trusses is readily available. You could start with the FEMA report. Its chapter on WTC7 is not very long. If you are trying to imply that the transfer trusses were a factor in the building's collapse, you should recognize that NIST utterly rejects that notion.
@ctcole77 According to NIST, structural damage from WTC1 debris played no part in the collapse initiation of WTC7.
It always amuses me when defenders of the official accounts invent fanciful theories that the officials have repudiated.
Do your homework. Start with FEMA's chapter on WTC7 (about 20 pages) and NIST's Appendix L to their 2005 report (about 50 pages). Then you can go on to the 2008 WTC7 reports.
You might want to actually read NIST's finding before you start making false claims.
"The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building."
Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79.
This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.
The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures.
Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.
Oh, in case you didn't know, NIST came out with their findings in 2008, NOT 2005.
@ctcole77 NIST wrote a preliminary report on WTC7 in 2005; it was attached at Appendix L to the NCSTAR 1 report. Maybe if you'd do your homework you wouldn't indulge such peculiar notions.
It's sad that a video made by the BBC called "the power of knightmares" which proves that AL-QAEDA DOES NOT EXIST added 2 years ago on UTube has got about 94000 views but a video about Anna Nicole Smith also added 2 years ago has received 2 315 000 views!!!!!!!!! No wonder the general public is getting fucked in the ass by the elites welcome to the Matrix
There's no "Al Queda," there are lots of al quedas.
It's just a slogan used as a name, like "Earth First!"
Both names are in the public domain where anyone can use them for anything. The FBI has created Earth First cells. No doubt theCIA creates some al queda cells. But some al quedas spring genuinely from the grass roots too.
Of course it was an inside job. Bushco knew what was coming. Making sure nothing could go wrong with the attack was the inside job. NORAD protocols had to be changed, war games scheduled. No ter'rist could do that.
Honestly this guy is right, there needs to be an investigate of what really happened on September 11. How did building 7 fall when it was 100 yards away from the twin towers?? I don't get that! There must've been demolition devices used to cause that.
krucial3nough 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it was the u.s government who dun it, i seen em with my own eyes, i did!!
Tarinhoodbloore 1 year ago
it was the u.s government who dun it, i seen em with my own eyes, i did!!
Tarinhoodbloore 1 year ago
Surprised to see such openess about 9/11 on fox news!!!! Strange....
drknprts 1 year ago
Im With That Dude,The Goverment Has To Knows Something. Thats Some Crazy Shit!!
joey93701 1 year ago
We must bomb afghanistan! (2001)
We found treasures in afghanistan! (2010)
grizzly4agze88 1 year ago
What I don't get is that if it was indeed a small group of people who planted charges (Explosive or Goldschmidt /aluminothermicly based) wouldn't at least 1 slip up someday at a bar etc. or be overcome by guilt and therefore be compelled to spill the truth?
marmaladekamikaze 2 years ago
Yeah sure. I use that as a pickup line a lot. "Hey Baby, why don't you come back to my place and I'll tell you about how I blew up the World Trade Center and killed 3000 people." The thing is, they don't believe you.
punxsutawneybarney 2 years ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
If a postcard could survive the Hindenburg inferno isn't it possible for a passport to survive the WTC collapse?
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 The information on the WTC7 transfer trusses is readily available. You could start with the FEMA report. Its chapter on WTC7 is not very long. If you are trying to imply that the transfer trusses were a factor in the building's collapse, you should recognize that NIST utterly rejects that notion.
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
Nice try but there were MANY factors contributing to WTC 7's collapse. And the tranfers trusses DID contribute.
I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7 had NOTHING to do with the collapse?
How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?
How about the southwest corner of WTC chopped off?
Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 According to NIST, structural damage from WTC1 debris played no part in the collapse initiation of WTC7.
It always amuses me when defenders of the official accounts invent fanciful theories that the officials have repudiated.
Do your homework. Start with FEMA's chapter on WTC7 (about 20 pages) and NIST's Appendix L to their 2005 report (about 50 pages). Then you can go on to the 2008 WTC7 reports.
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
You might want to actually read NIST's finding before you start making false claims.
"The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building."
ctcole77 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79.
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 I didn't make any false claims. Have you seen the "Solving the Mystery of WTC7" video yet?
watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw Over 200,000 views in 2 weeks!
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.
The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures.
ctcole77 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.
Oh, in case you didn't know, NIST came out with their findings in 2008, NOT 2005.
Nice try lying shill!
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 NIST wrote a preliminary report on WTC7 in 2005; it was attached at Appendix L to the NCSTAR 1 report. Maybe if you'd do your homework you wouldn't indulge such peculiar notions.
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
So you're just ignoring NIST's final WTC 7 report released in August of 2008?
Just like you ignore evidence, facts, science, and eyewitness.
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 No, I'm not ignoring the final report. What gave you the idea I was?
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@marmaladekamikaze Who's going to believe them??
babanapeal 1 year ago
Good video.
PersianPaladin 2 years ago 11
It's sad that a video made by the BBC called "the power of knightmares" which proves that AL-QAEDA DOES NOT EXIST added 2 years ago on UTube has got about 94000 views but a video about Anna Nicole Smith also added 2 years ago has received 2 315 000 views!!!!!!!!! No wonder the general public is getting fucked in the ass by the elites welcome to the Matrix
SirQubit 2 years ago 5
There's no "Al Queda," there are lots of al quedas.
It's just a slogan used as a name, like "Earth First!"
Both names are in the public domain where anyone can use them for anything. The FBI has created Earth First cells. No doubt theCIA creates some al queda cells. But some al quedas spring genuinely from the grass roots too.
Read foreign newspapers.
drdischord 2 years ago
Great work finally some real unprejudiced journalism...we need more exposure....911 INSIDE JOB
alecboi84 2 years ago 2
Of course it was an inside job. Bushco knew what was coming. Making sure nothing could go wrong with the attack was the inside job. NORAD protocols had to be changed, war games scheduled. No ter'rist could do that.
drdischord 2 years ago
911 was an outsourced job.
4000MILESdown 2 years ago
we lived in a fascist outsourced society!
kjack5 2 years ago