Dual 590 GTX just won't run on damn 1100T. It's fail when you get 28 fps on F.E.A.R 3 and it's not even maxed out! Amd Fail? Or just can't handle 2x 590 GTX's?
"This won´t be relevant when bulldozer comes out"..... yeah well..... Bulldozer was a huge disappointment and is not even better then i5 2500k and i7 2600k for gaming.
Note to people you run AMD its better to run ATI video cards. GTX runs like shit on the AMD cus the ATI has better software setup. The 1100T outbeats the 2500k with ATI cards.
@homelifehome No....No it doesn't Lol. THere is nothing special about using an ATI card on an AMD platform. There is nothing on board the GPU that says "OH! AMD processor! Full speed ahead!".The only difference is that most AMD chipsets support Xfire right out the box. And if you have a lower end GPU that sits in the same series of GFX it they can be Xfired together. But using something like a 6970 you can't do that anyways. It's just a marketing ploy
@LinusPlayZ How much do you have ? If u Already have a Monitor and W7, well u can easly get a HD 6970 + i5 2500 and all the other stuff for les than 800€
@donvoisko Its meant to be Ironic as Apple and Nvidia have absoloutely nothing in common, I think its on an Ipad unboxing you see him sticking it on the GTX590
hey nice test,since you have shown the intel vs amd on games would you do for 3D softwares and rendering and which one would win and the best for 3d modelling on 6870,560Ti, and the 580 nvidia single and dual gpu.The same core i5 2500k vs the 1100T and the new fx 8120 zambezi 8 core and the super power intel in that range core i7 6 core 3130
@swissaholic 3D Modelling: I7 Extreme Porcessor Series! Bulldozer is way cheaper, but also not as fast. So if you wnat the fastest, get the Extreme Intel CPU!
@iVortexUK Recording is more affected by harddrive speeds than cpu. And AMD has more cores but less power in each core, so the ratio is about 1.5 amd cores to 1 intel core.
p67 sabertooth it has the most stable 24/7 high oc rated mobo, if your wondering p67 or z68..the z68 enables onboard video use on the cpu, and a ssd caching. other than that it is a p67, and since your getting a 2500k utilizing onboard video really serves no purpose since you are obviously going to use a dedicated gpu because it is a gaming processor that comes unlocked for overclocking and ssd caching is a little on the redundant side if you ask me
Oh ATI is excellent! But I threw them out the window because ATI drivers failed me half of the time. But I loved my 5870 Crossfire setup. And so did my dad after seeing the power bill from my 580 SLi setup :')
Oh ATI is excellent! But I threw them out the window because ATI drivers failed me half of the time. But I loved my 5870 Crossfire setup. And so did my dad after seeing the power bill from my 580 SLi setup :')
Intel with a msi board and a Amd with asus? Come on dude! Asus and Asus! Lol
The benchmark results are proof why I buy intel for gaming. 10fps more is 10fps more, more is always better. Msi though, yikes!!! That's like buying a ford escort with a BMW steering wheel lol
@lschlutt73 Oh come on... Asus isnt the only ones that can make a motherboard. I use MSI and I love them. Gigabyte is also a great company and they make very good motherboards. Asus is just too bland for me.
@TheVidyahGamers lol, just busting your chops bud. I'm a fan of Asus. I've owned MSI and a few others and never had much luck with them. Its like Ford and Chevy, some have better luck with Ford while others have better luck with Chevy.
At this point I just feel bad for AMD... I hope they can still drag themselves along with their graphics division. Because really... even at crap-quality, they're still presenting Intel with some kind of competition, which means the consumers win.
The day AMD definitively goes out of the CPU business is the day the consumers loose.
@BurnShot226 im not a fan of AMD if feel like Intel processors last longer but for gaming I say they're very similar expect for the Pentium 4 that processor wasn't very good
I'm wondering as well about those framerates. Seems that the resolution makes a big difference there. I'm running a X4 955 @ 4,2 GHz and a slightly oveclocked Gigabyte GTX460. And Crysis 2 at a resolution of 1920x1080 I played at highest settings, tesselation and the dx11 patch at about 40 fps staright. So why should I pay so much for not only one GTX590, but two? I payed 130€ for my GTX460 and having no problems with any game on the market.
After reading hundreds and hundreds of comments, I came to the conclusion that we are in dire need of better English teachers. I also learned that people are stupid when it comes to brand names; use whatever works for you at a price that fits your budget. Last thing I learned was that people watch videos in English, read comments in English, and are dumb enough to post their comment in another language.
Why would anyone want to have 80 fps instead of 40ish, humans cant see more than like 34 so its wasted AMD are better since your getting more value for money, they are like 50% less cost wise and the difference is not even noticeable
@Masterincommander This is an idiot argument. It's true that the human brain can only process around 35 images per second, but the your brain can also tell that there's less time between each frame above the ''seeable'' frames. I can easily tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps, 60 and 120, and 120 and 240. It's blatently obvious.
... interesting my Asus M4N98TD Evo bored goes up to 2600k in the bios settings :S im using 2 560's with an AMD 955 quad cpu. It provides high frames in every gamea ive played so far such as Crysis 2 FF14 and NFS shift
@Vince62965 yeh but intel is still better, which is why amd recently announced that they are going to stop competing with intel in the processore market
@088mac No they are not stopping. They just don't have any high-end chips that don't compete fully yet. They used the same strategy against nVidia a few years ago. That doesn't mean the new FX chips aren't good for gaming. Benchmarks mean shit-all to an end user who just wants smooth game-play. There's not much difference between 80 fps and 84 fps.
@lordfirefox they are not stopping production no, but they did announce that they would not compete for the top place, probably because of intels hyperthreading. which they cant use
@088mac This wasn't always the case. When AMD had the better product, intel paid all the manufacturers big bucks to not use them. Where is the incentive in making a kickass product when the competition does that?
@MrCanzara whether it wasnt always the case or not, the intel product are constantly keeping top, and when i talk about benchmarking im referring to the tests that are done to see which is better, and intel comes out on top
@088mac They also faked benchmarks. I would suggest rather then raving about how great intel is, look into their disgusting illegal business practices.
They had to sign an agreement promising not to do it anymore, look into it, what I say is fact.
@088mac Your rational is flawed, but if you can't see that then there is no point arguing any further.
As I already said, enjoy those 1000$ bottom of the line CPU's. Just 15 years ago thats what they were worth and if AMD drops out, thats what they will be again and you can thank your support of their dishonest business practice for it.
I have EVERY right. Again, only a complete moron would say they paid billions out in settlements cause it was lies.
@MrCanzara it was predicted that the lawsuit would go on for years, so they would have weighed up the options and decided that the settlement is cheaper as huge lawsuits can cost billions
also, it is now a lot cheaper to make processors than it was 15years ago, so they are much cheaper to buy too
also me and my friend did tests and worked out that my £250 4core 4.2GHz intel processor is 3x better than his £200 8-core 4.6GHZ amd processor
if you do some proper research or tests intel is better.OK
@MrCanzara there are already $1000 dollar CPU's, but when new products come out like Ivybridge, they will be at roughly the same price as the Sandybridge models they are replacing.
also, they will be around 50% better with performance, and for the same price, thats a pretty good investment if you plan to keep it for a while
There are also 150$ CPU's. Those are the ones that will be 1000$ when there is no more AMD just like they were 15 years ago when i first started building computer's.
Competition is GOOD and bad business practice screws the me and you...if you don't get it I'm not going to make you get it so we'll all pay for what you, and many others, don't get.
@MrCanzara if AMD went out of business intel would not boost its prices up to $1000 because if they did another company would come into the market and sell a lot more cpus than intel because no one would be able to afford to buy any, so intel would not be making a smart decision by selling at prices only a few people can afford, so if you cant work that out then you cant be as clever as you seem to be trying to make out with this argument that has nothing to do with what i originally said
but its all made up lies and intel paid AMD 1.2 BILLION over something that wasn't true?
Better is a perspective. I think its BAD to support corporations like Intel, therefore the product itself is secondary to the consequences of supporting their business practice.
Faster also, doesn't necessarily mean "better" its all in how you look at it.
To be honest though, I'm just playing devils advocate. I'm currently running a 2500k...
LOL the handwriting is similar to mine
mikestonecold 3 hours ago
Dual 590 GTX just won't run on damn 1100T. It's fail when you get 28 fps on F.E.A.R 3 and it's not even maxed out! Amd Fail? Or just can't handle 2x 590 GTX's?
MaximumCore1911 3 hours ago
Why do Intel fans hate on AMD? I have one as I had a budget to stick to and I've had it for about a year and I don't have any complaints against it.
xAT4 3 hours ago
Truly Equivilent MY ASS!!!! AMD Rigs can be FAR better than what this guy puts them out to be.
flamesafety 5 hours ago
please get those stickers off the gtx 590s. :(
NzV123 8 hours ago
"This won´t be relevant when bulldozer comes out"..... yeah well..... Bulldozer was a huge disappointment and is not even better then i5 2500k and i7 2600k for gaming.
TheSezla 1 day ago
@TheSezla Bogus.
flamesafety 5 hours ago
Note to people you run AMD its better to run ATI video cards. GTX runs like shit on the AMD cus the ATI has better software setup. The 1100T outbeats the 2500k with ATI cards.
homelifehome 1 day ago
@homelifehome No....No it doesn't Lol. THere is nothing special about using an ATI card on an AMD platform. There is nothing on board the GPU that says "OH! AMD processor! Full speed ahead!".The only difference is that most AMD chipsets support Xfire right out the box. And if you have a lower end GPU that sits in the same series of GFX it they can be Xfired together. But using something like a 6970 you can't do that anyways. It's just a marketing ploy
lamiac2411 19 hours ago
@homelifehome Uhm, AMD Radeons have shitty drivers.
Helge129 12 minutes ago
I want it'
GraffyV 1 day ago
1 intel core = 2 amd cores
2 intel cores = 4 amd cores
4 intel cores = 8 amd cores
8 intel cores = 16 amd cores
its easy.
Vo0oOo0oV 1 day ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@Vo0oOo0oV But keep in Mind:
1 intel core costs as much as 2 amd cores
2 intel cores cost as much as 4 amd cores
4 intel cores cost as much as 8 amd cores
8 intel cores cost as much as 16 amd cores
khosrow 1 day ago
vancouver ftw !! bröderna SEDIN !!
MrRoxswe 1 day ago
I could never effort this, im so sad now
LinusPlayZ 2 days ago
@LinusPlayZ How much do you have ? If u Already have a Monitor and W7, well u can easly get a HD 6970 + i5 2500 and all the other stuff for les than 800€
WoodStRR 1 day ago
@WoodStRR i have an gtx 570 and an i5 2500k, i mean the 2 GTX 590
LinusPlayZ 1 day ago
now do it with a zambezi
akro187 2 days ago
intel is boss
SirJimBobNoKnob 2 days ago
*cough* fail
ouroborouspriest 2 days ago
lol it was the nvidia drivers doing the framerate loss
Xedus661 3 days ago
I want a smoothie!
LIFESaGAME247 3 days ago
@Forgotten455 Maybe a faster Video card. Thats a nice setup. I have a simular setup with a 9500 GT and i get 30 Frames per second.
websuspect 3 days ago
Nice Mac stickers on the GPU's....Just no.
wolf1010 3 days ago
Thumbs up for Intel!
marouanebenouzekri 4 days ago
@marouanebenouzekri
no.
just no.
markowina 4 days ago 6
intel!!!
russiancommy 4 days ago
тоесть nvidia ухудшает показатели amd и улучшает intel? пипец. а рradeon везде честный
diman5567 6 days ago
@diman5567 no one can understand russian/ukraine here so speak englisch cunt
KJDJBeatsOfficial 3 days ago
такого быть не может. таких отличий в fps
diman5567 6 days ago
@diman5567 ENGLISH MOTHER FUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT?
LutMejiaJ 4 days ago 4
@LutMejiaJ w..w..what? what?
asaaasaaaa 3 days ago
Comment removed
diman5567 6 days ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Intel + Nvidia = AMD thumb up if you agree if not comment !! =))))))) AMD best for me!
kreystufer1 6 days ago
again that 590 with the stupid apple sticker. dude, linus... whats the catch?
donvoisko 6 days ago
@donvoisko Its meant to be Ironic as Apple and Nvidia have absoloutely nothing in common, I think its on an Ipad unboxing you see him sticking it on the GTX590
canthaguild 6 days ago
@LinusTechTips how much it is to built with those spec?
yellowocean155 1 week ago
please tell me, how much it is to build with those spec?
yellowocean155 1 week ago
@yellowocean155 Probably a little over 1600 euros.
manosman97 6 days ago
hey nice test,since you have shown the intel vs amd on games would you do for 3D softwares and rendering and which one would win and the best for 3d modelling on 6870,560Ti, and the 580 nvidia single and dual gpu.The same core i5 2500k vs the 1100T and the new fx 8120 zambezi 8 core and the super power intel in that range core i7 6 core 3130
swissaholic 1 week ago
@swissaholic 3D Modelling: I7 Extreme Porcessor Series! Bulldozer is way cheaper, but also not as fast. So if you wnat the fastest, get the Extreme Intel CPU!
MrGermanBratwurst 4 days ago
Fear 3 seems kinda Intel bias...
margolo 1 week ago
what mouse is that visible at 1:04
majin64 1 week ago
@majin64 Mionix Naos 5000, if Im not wrong.
muttibow 1 week ago
Isn't AMD meant for multi-tasking? And Intel aimed more towards gaming? I would prefer an AMD because I record whilst playing.
iVortexUK 1 week ago
@iVortexUK so you can have more fps while recording??
uljt 1 week ago
Comment removed
ThatOneJaredAndLucas 1 week ago
@iVortexUK Recording is more affected by harddrive speeds than cpu. And AMD has more cores but less power in each core, so the ratio is about 1.5 amd cores to 1 intel core.
Patrunic 1 week ago
@Patrunic Oh :p I personnaly have a low end I5 (650) @ 3.2GHz and its never done me wrong
iVortexUK 1 week ago
So AMD isn`t that bad at all ???
MrGadniara12 1 week ago
what I would do for that hardware :(
I can barely run bfbc2 on absolute lowest settings
chesterchow1 1 week ago
@DisYaBoiLaw i mean whats the best motherboard for it
arthurtutu48 1 week ago
Steelseries Siberia v2 <3
adtnotdead 1 week ago
@LinusTechTips
Maybe I missed it, but did you have either processor OC'd?
TheCanadianBakin 1 week ago
This has to be one of the worst comparisons i have ever seen
Gmaker202 1 week ago
@arthurtutu48 i5 2500k is a Processor not Motherboard.
DisYaBoiLaw 1 week ago
@DisYaBoiLaw pretty sure he meant whats the best 1155 motherboard, you respond with 1155 is a socket not a motherboard see my analogy/metaphor
anhiirr 1 week ago
@DisYaBoiLaw hes talking about best motherboard for i52500k
Bhav025 1 hour ago
@LinusTechTips can you tell me the best i5 2500k motherboard available?
Thanks
arthurtutu48 1 week ago
p67 sabertooth it has the most stable 24/7 high oc rated mobo, if your wondering p67 or z68..the z68 enables onboard video use on the cpu, and a ssd caching. other than that it is a p67, and since your getting a 2500k utilizing onboard video really serves no purpose since you are obviously going to use a dedicated gpu because it is a gaming processor that comes unlocked for overclocking and ssd caching is a little on the redundant side if you ask me
anhiirr 1 week ago
thanks, that seems like a lot of work to test.
FrancekPirosrancek 1 week ago
Linus, what do you think: will the FX8120 benefit from the upcoming patches and fixes so it will become comparable to the 2500/2600k i7's?
The patches seem promising but no one actually knows what the performance gain will be.
ThisIsSATA 1 week ago
@ThisIsSATA
techpowerup put some benchs with the new patches, it didn't go well -.-
progste 1 week ago
6870s pff thats old ill just grab my spare 6970s lolz!!!
SkuxxDeluxx0 1 week ago
GTX 590 from Apple?
seljd 1 week ago
@seljd Hehehe, no, Linus isn't a fan of apple. He put the sticker there as a joke.
cutiekazoe10 1 week ago
im an amd fanboy for cpu's, but it doesnt really matter to me about gpu's. both amd and nvidia cards are about the same performance wise
denisaaj 1 week ago
@denisaaj same can be said for cpus lol
robthatguyx 1 week ago
do this with 2500k and 2600k plz
sShiv73 1 week ago
@sShiv73 i5 is better for gaming only difference is hyperthreading
robthatguyx 1 week ago
@sShiv73 2500k
robthatguyx 1 week ago
I was so informed! Until that canucks cup.... it all went out the window. I gotta go.... jk :-)
j14mp 1 week ago
This also proves how ati has better graphics than nivdia one card beat out there quad sli
hobbitthesnowman 1 week ago
@hobbitthesnowman
Oh ATI is excellent! But I threw them out the window because ATI drivers failed me half of the time. But I loved my 5870 Crossfire setup. And so did my dad after seeing the power bill from my 580 SLi setup :')
EliteGhost001 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hobbitthesnowman
Oh ATI is excellent! But I threw them out the window because ATI drivers failed me half of the time. But I loved my 5870 Crossfire setup. And so did my dad after seeing the power bill from my 580 SLi setup :')
EliteGhost001 1 week ago
amd always does better with ati graphics i would love to see this test again with the 6970 for all the games
hobbitthesnowman 1 week ago
what means QUAD SLI? isn't that a two way sli?
pilopiloCH 1 week ago
@pilopiloCH the GTX590 is a dual GPU, so if you have two GTX590's in SLI its actually quad SLI as it has four GPU's
andrew4818 1 week ago
@pilopiloCH GTX 590 is two underclocked GTX 580s
1993gandy 1 week ago
AMD butchered the Bulldozer. As of now, i5-2500k is the gaming king in terms of value to performance category.
ld871111 1 week ago
Intel with a msi board and a Amd with asus? Come on dude! Asus and Asus! Lol
The benchmark results are proof why I buy intel for gaming. 10fps more is 10fps more, more is always better. Msi though, yikes!!! That's like buying a ford escort with a BMW steering wheel lol
lschlutt73 1 week ago
@lschlutt73 Oh come on... Asus isnt the only ones that can make a motherboard. I use MSI and I love them. Gigabyte is also a great company and they make very good motherboards. Asus is just too bland for me.
TheVidyahGamers 1 week ago
@TheVidyahGamers lol, just busting your chops bud. I'm a fan of Asus. I've owned MSI and a few others and never had much luck with them. Its like Ford and Chevy, some have better luck with Ford while others have better luck with Chevy.
lschlutt73 1 week ago
At this point I just feel bad for AMD... I hope they can still drag themselves along with their graphics division. Because really... even at crap-quality, they're still presenting Intel with some kind of competition, which means the consumers win.
The day AMD definitively goes out of the CPU business is the day the consumers loose.
EdouardDubois 1 week ago
@EdouardDubois unfortunatly they just did, and im already seeing a rise in cpu's prices :(
seirv0621 1 week ago
i am more of a amd person as they have a higher core count half of the time but a lower clock speed and amd are cheaper for a price to performance
mylaptopdiednooo 1 week ago
AMD is a flimsy undercut.
McSwigg 1 week ago
I like how he is testing all these advance computers and uses a pen paper too show the frame rates lol
Pandacamper 1 week ago
@Pandacamper Also, he's using the same mobo for an Intel and an AMD processor...
BurnShot226 1 week ago
@BurnShot226 im not a fan of AMD if feel like Intel processors last longer but for gaming I say they're very similar expect for the Pentium 4 that processor wasn't very good
Pandacamper 1 week ago
need more ram
topgunsmoke 1 week ago
Intel FTW
FlaminGamer101 1 week ago
Linus said "35.5%" instead of "33.5%" on crysis 2 ^_^
27Geraline 2 weeks ago
its a good reason intel earned ALOT money and amd did not.
WickedWizard95 2 weeks ago
does the reverse fan on the stock amd heatsink work?
tbone8ty 2 weeks ago
@tbone8ty no its reversing the the heat back onto the cpu.
rushawnjones 1 week ago
nice wire managment!!
jony6107 2 weeks ago
He's trolling us with that Apple sticker
GethAreAwesome 2 weeks ago
"AMD finally has a gaming platform"
>Apple logo on a video card
Couldn't watch this video past 0:24
asillynoob 2 weeks ago
I'm wondering as well about those framerates. Seems that the resolution makes a big difference there. I'm running a X4 955 @ 4,2 GHz and a slightly oveclocked Gigabyte GTX460. And Crysis 2 at a resolution of 1920x1080 I played at highest settings, tesselation and the dx11 patch at about 40 fps staright. So why should I pay so much for not only one GTX590, but two? I payed 130€ for my GTX460 and having no problems with any game on the market.
My 955 was only 89€ by the way.
Oldenways 2 weeks ago
I heard an iphone!!! :D
KONGONTOWER 2 weeks ago
wait a sec my asus gtx 570 plays crysis 2 maxed out ate 49fps...
TheOtherShell 2 weeks ago
fastest gaming machine for amd? llolololololololololololololololololololololol
MegaDeathwarrant 2 weeks ago 2
12fps with dual graphics cards? What the hell do they expect you to have for full fps!?
AdhocHoopla 2 weeks ago
Nice lines on the page. :)
fragz1426 2 weeks ago
sooo i52500k won? dah
yadiel1234 2 weeks ago
PUKE
Ubern33b 2 weeks ago
rulers are your friend :(
14ofthem 2 weeks ago
apple sticker, why?
adampb23 2 weeks ago
i7 2600K FTW!!! :D
Matteasdd 2 weeks ago
@Matteasdd *I7 2700k FTW!
TheAustin3184 2 weeks ago
@TheAustin3184 yea thats too FTW! :D
Matteasdd 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you know what comparing intel and amd is like comparing coca-cola and pepsi :D
daniel24634 2 weeks ago
disliked because of the apple logo.
kvanmete7675 3 weeks ago
The Apple sticker's probably there to get us commenting.
Why don't you record this shit on a laptop or something? Looking at your notepad reminds me of school >_<
Genixel 3 weeks ago
yaaaay....
MyDelldelldell 3 weeks ago
Love the Intel fan on the AMD Processor, but I do love those stock coolers. I've never had any problems with them.
Deletehead 3 weeks ago
Are you freakin' rich?
CarlosCH1221 3 weeks ago
@CarlosCH1221 He doesn't own any of that hardware the venders let him use them to review.
MADdrummer971 3 weeks ago
gotta love the Nucks logo on the mug ... aweeesome ...
Enoch5939 3 weeks ago
Lol, should have tried 2x6870! Driver issues are long gone on those!
233kosta 3 weeks ago
what about duel 6990's an 8 core 3.6 ghz amd processor and 16GB of ram?
zyL03413 3 weeks ago
@zyL03413 Look at the date of the video.
grimy89098 3 weeks ago
amd cpu amd gpu. intel cpu nvidia gpu
123pvpworld 3 weeks ago
@123pvpworld i have a 990x intel and an ati 7970 3gb mine runs flawless
TheMarcusman14 3 weeks ago
After reading hundreds and hundreds of comments, I came to the conclusion that we are in dire need of better English teachers. I also learned that people are stupid when it comes to brand names; use whatever works for you at a price that fits your budget. Last thing I learned was that people watch videos in English, read comments in English, and are dumb enough to post their comment in another language.
nambinhvu 3 weeks ago
Lol, he thought bulldozer was going to be useful.
degtyarev708 3 weeks ago
ssd or portable hdd goflex he use on amd?
Emper0rRobert 3 weeks ago
The fan on the AMD heatsink is on upside down?
MasterNaruto1214 3 weeks ago
like this comment if that Apple sticker makes you want to un-sub ...................
JaysTechReview 3 weeks ago 2
Why would anyone want to have 80 fps instead of 40ish, humans cant see more than like 34 so its wasted AMD are better since your getting more value for money, they are like 50% less cost wise and the difference is not even noticeable
Masterincommander 3 weeks ago
@Masterincommander That is not true .. I can easily see the difference between 60 FPS and 120 FPS
tore1992 3 weeks ago
@Masterincommander
Can't tell if serious or trolling
thepocarisweat 3 weeks ago
@Masterincommander This is an idiot argument. It's true that the human brain can only process around 35 images per second, but the your brain can also tell that there's less time between each frame above the ''seeable'' frames. I can easily tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps, 60 and 120, and 120 and 240. It's blatently obvious.
Veence1987 3 weeks ago
Lol this is also showing how Nvidia's cards aren't as good as AMD's :P
AnonymousKev 3 weeks ago
Intel is OK, their processors slow down ALOT after a couple of years.
AnonymousKev 3 weeks ago
@AnonymousKev Do you overclock your Intel CPUs?
You might be finding that the processors are degrading from the added stress caused by overclocking.
MasterNaruto1214 3 weeks ago
@MasterNaruto1214 :P no it was a Pentium 4 in an HP computer, and a Pentium in a Dell.
AnonymousKev 3 weeks ago
omg he is so rich -.-
mascachapas92 3 weeks ago
@mascachapas92 or.. he simply get all that stuff at his job to test. which is most likely true.
pruskis13 3 weeks ago
lol at the apple sticker on the gpu's at the beginning haha
Frostedchunks 3 weeks ago
AMD ALL DAY!
TwinTurboPigeon 3 weeks ago
@TwinTurboPigeon i swear i use a lot of computer parts AMD and intal
right now i'm only running AMD , they operate so much better overall
Intel is only clamming it's faster then AMD but Intel as a lot more money
and most of the best technology they got it from AMD Support AMD if they start making more R&D AMD would easily beat
intel , there on the right track , but people don't stop posting fake rumors
new cpu needs time to adapt
srt4pwr 3 weeks ago
AMD is fore poor ppl
and
Intel is fore rich ppl ^^
i have my self a I7 3960x .
SWEViper84 3 weeks ago
@SWEViper84 richboy :D i only has 2500k.
Tweaty14 3 weeks ago 21
@Tweaty14 hehehe it is only a joke comment^^ Your CPU is kickass !! i did have the 2600k before the i7 3960x !!
SWEViper84 3 weeks ago
@SWEViper84 ur such a faggot
threatfiree 3 weeks ago
@threatfiree aaaa ty sweeheart :-D you can't afford Intel?? First try to get a job !! have fun cupcake :-D
SWEViper84 3 weeks ago
Get that apple sticker off that beautiful pc. Apple rejected nvidia.
PR0XIDIAN 4 weeks ago 132
@PR0XIDIAN what no they didnt
Armaangandevia1 2 weeks ago
@PR0XIDIAN LOL I love you for that comment!
BiGoDeViN28 2 weeks ago
... interesting my Asus M4N98TD Evo bored goes up to 2600k in the bios settings :S im using 2 560's with an AMD 955 quad cpu. It provides high frames in every gamea ive played so far such as Crysis 2 FF14 and NFS shift
Vince62965 4 weeks ago
@Vince62965 yeh but intel is still better, which is why amd recently announced that they are going to stop competing with intel in the processore market
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac No they are not stopping. They just don't have any high-end chips that don't compete fully yet. They used the same strategy against nVidia a few years ago. That doesn't mean the new FX chips aren't good for gaming. Benchmarks mean shit-all to an end user who just wants smooth game-play. There's not much difference between 80 fps and 84 fps.
lordfirefox 2 weeks ago
@lordfirefox they are not stopping production no, but they did announce that they would not compete for the top place, probably because of intels hyperthreading. which they cant use
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac This wasn't always the case. When AMD had the better product, intel paid all the manufacturers big bucks to not use them. Where is the incentive in making a kickass product when the competition does that?
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara whether it wasnt always the case or not, the intel product are constantly keeping top, and when i talk about benchmarking im referring to the tests that are done to see which is better, and intel comes out on top
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac They also faked benchmarks. I would suggest rather then raving about how great intel is, look into their disgusting illegal business practices.
They had to sign an agreement promising not to do it anymore, look into it, what I say is fact.
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara the following are facts
1-intel was not proved of illegal practices, and all lawsuits where ended with settlements
2-intel products are better, 4 intel core are faster than 8 amd cores
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac Ohh so they settled cause it wasn't true?
And this folks, is why we have coporations creating monopolies and screwing consumers with them.
People like 088 would rather make excuses and support it then condemn it.
Let me know how you enjoy those 1000$ bottom of the line processors.
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara im not saying they didnt pay people off, im saying it wasnt proven so you have no right to go out and say that they definitely did it
im also saying that intel processors are better, you pay a bit more money for a better quality product and thats the end of it.
this is all im am trying to point out, if you have the money, buy the better intel processors
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac Your rational is flawed, but if you can't see that then there is no point arguing any further.
As I already said, enjoy those 1000$ bottom of the line CPU's. Just 15 years ago thats what they were worth and if AMD drops out, thats what they will be again and you can thank your support of their dishonest business practice for it.
I have EVERY right. Again, only a complete moron would say they paid billions out in settlements cause it was lies.
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara it was predicted that the lawsuit would go on for years, so they would have weighed up the options and decided that the settlement is cheaper as huge lawsuits can cost billions
also, it is now a lot cheaper to make processors than it was 15years ago, so they are much cheaper to buy too
also me and my friend did tests and worked out that my £250 4core 4.2GHz intel processor is 3x better than his £200 8-core 4.6GHZ amd processor
if you do some proper research or tests intel is better.OK
088mac 2 weeks ago
@088mac sigh, context is lost on you. Mark my words...1000$ cpus are coming.
I just went from an 1100T to a 2500K as this test is all about I know first hand what the difference is.
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara there are already $1000 dollar CPU's, but when new products come out like Ivybridge, they will be at roughly the same price as the Sandybridge models they are replacing.
also, they will be around 50% better with performance, and for the same price, thats a pretty good investment if you plan to keep it for a while
088mac 2 weeks ago
There are also 150$ CPU's. Those are the ones that will be 1000$ when there is no more AMD just like they were 15 years ago when i first started building computer's.
Competition is GOOD and bad business practice screws the me and you...if you don't get it I'm not going to make you get it so we'll all pay for what you, and many others, don't get.
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
@MrCanzara if AMD went out of business intel would not boost its prices up to $1000 because if they did another company would come into the market and sell a lot more cpus than intel because no one would be able to afford to buy any, so intel would not be making a smart decision by selling at prices only a few people can afford, so if you cant work that out then you cant be as clever as you seem to be trying to make out with this argument that has nothing to do with what i originally said
088mac 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@088mac ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/intel.shtm
but its all made up lies and intel paid AMD 1.2 BILLION over something that wasn't true?
Better is a perspective. I think its BAD to support corporations like Intel, therefore the product itself is secondary to the consequences of supporting their business practice.
Faster also, doesn't necessarily mean "better" its all in how you look at it.
To be honest though, I'm just playing devils advocate. I'm currently running a 2500k...
MrCanzara 2 weeks ago
Also first time when I noticed fully Linus'ssubscriber image.
"More unboxing?" -controversated face-
FOGoticus 4 weeks ago
F.3.A.R difference is too fucking high man what the hell is AMD doing using cpus or phones to load?
FOGoticus 4 weeks ago
AMD for the WIN baby
FreddyGaming 4 weeks ago
Yo dude did u check out the time between frames if it was stable?
FreddyGaming 4 weeks ago