Added: 2 years ago
From: VaughnFry
Views: 6,333
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Edge of Darkness was the first Mel Gibson movie (as an actor) since 2003 and it was great. Some things were shocking and intriguing and even thrilling. Mel is very talented actor and did a great job here. He was as impressive as Jodie Foster in The Brave One. Now I hope to see more and more new films with Mel

  • Edge of Darkness was the first Mel Gibson movie (as an actor) since 2003 and it was great. Some things were shocking and intriguing and even thrilling. Mel is very talented actor and did a great job here. He was as impressive as Jodie Foster in The Brave One. Now I hope to see more and more new films with Mel

  • You pronounced sparse wrong Vaughn.  From the worlds toughest grammar critic. Thank you for the good review.

  • One of the only reasons on why I liked this movie was because it was the first and only movie that I was an extra in.

  • @mighitman haha. I've had a similar experience. Except outside of Sundance, no one has seen my movie, and you can only see the back of my head for a second.

  • if you guys are looking for a good place to watch i found this site

    watchedgeofdarknessonline [dot] net

  • Nice review, and wth happened to you on TGWTG forum!?

    Good reviews though! Keep it up!

  • lol at the milk thing. and also lol at a native australian trying to speak in a bostonian accent. thats about the same to me as gerald butler in 300. he didnt talk any bit an accent of greek and i could hear his stupid scottish accent the whole time.

  • Actually from the trailers I immediately thought this was Death Wish 2010

  • Im going to check this out this afternoon, I'll let you know what I think. Im hoping its going o be enjoyable :)

  • I'm going to have to agree with vaughn. The last 2 bond movies tried to make him into more of a Jason Bourne or Jack Bauer character (going rouge and everything.) That's not what Bond is about. Gadgets were always a staple of the Bond series.

  • well those are the movies the books are very different though The new films are actually very faithful to the book series. But I do love the old bond movies awesomeness incarnate, Ive always wanted a shoe phone even though thats not very practical lol

  • Goldeneye over Casino Royale? You can't be serious.

  • One is a true Bond film, the other is front-loaded with action, stars a short/chest shaving Bond, has no gadgets, and is boring in the third act.

  • are you insane!? Casino Royale doesnt even come close to Goldeneye!! Goldeneye was a true bond film! and just a much better movie

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more