I've read a lot of Hitchens and know well of his adoration for Orwell. I've been so excited to start my English class's reading of Animal Farm, and we are beginning tomorrow. It would be beyond amazing to have Hitch teach our class!
We demean each other thru the dogmatic strictures of animalism/animalitarianism ("atheism") in order: to deny Spiritualism; to wage total war; to value animals above humans; to commit clinician-assisted aborticide; to befoul the water w/fluoride & serums w/mercury; to becloud the air w/aluminum via tanker jets; to burn tumorous growths w/x-rays; to subject our hearts to allopathic diagnostics: radioactive dyes & Adrenalin-based stress tests; to venerate amoral men.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Hitchens, ' God is not great' is one of my favourite books. For similar great thoughts try Dan Barker, John W. Loftus, Robert M Price, Valerie Tarico, Victor Stenger, Bart Ehrman, Ken Humphreys, Richard Carrier, Ken Pulliam, Keith Parsons, Gary Greenberg, Robert Ingersoll, Thomas Paine, Mark Twain, Earl Doherty, Israel Finkelstein, Daniel Dennett, C Dennis Mckinsey, Joseph Wheless, Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris,
FYI: -there is nothing mystical about Geo.Orwell's book- "1984", --as it is a fact that he socialized with these criminal-elite agents of Rothschild/Rockefeller's et'al Jew-Zionists, --and unlike patriot Henry'Ford and Chas.Lindbergh, and St.Hitler, --whom tried to expose these subversives, Orwell simply wrote about the Jews sick-plans to enslave humanity via their zealous control of all Banks internationally, which is finally coming into fruition...!!!
This is true. There's absolutely no way he could have envisaged so perfectly what was going to happen unless he himself knew those people who were in power and what their intentions were.
It's not surprising at all since he was a King's Scholar at Eton and also went to Wellington College (you can usually only get into Eton or Wellington if you're from the creme of the ultra-'elite', and those are the clique he was socialized into.
I think it's interesting that Orwell writes 1984 while he's dying of TB and Hitch dying of cancer seems to have that same spirit of continuing the fight right up to the bitter end.
Orwell's major mistake was to wrongly predict that fascism in the future would arise from the right when in fact the victory of Russia and a sympathetic socialist British state in the war guaranteed that the next fascism we would face would be from the liberal-left. We now see in the United Kingdom a progressive-commuitarian marxist-Islamist state emerging. Modern Britain is a product of the Frankfurt school of cultural marxism. With groups of leftists shouting hate against nationalists.
Orwell's major mistake was to wrongly predict that fascism in the future would arise from the right when in fact the victory of Russia and a sympathetic socialist British state in the war guaranteed that the next fascism we would face would be from the liberal-left. We now see in the United Kingdom a progressive-commuitarian marxist-Islamist state emerging. Modern Britain is a product of the Frankfurt school of cultural marxism. With groups of leftists shouting hate against nationalists.
A little bit off topic, but if you ever want to expand your vocabulary, read a Hitchens book. Yikes. I haven't come across an author who so deftly draws from such a vast repository of the english language.
@PenguinProseMedia You should read Vladimir Nabokov. He is also an outstanding linguist. When reading one of his books, you find you're actually reading two. You're reading his book, allong with a dictionary (or two, in the case of Lolita, where much of it is in French).
@lukeashmoore So? I'm not Hitchens' lap dog. I quite enjoy Nabokov's work. If Hitchens has an opinion to the conrary, then he has an opinion to the contrary. When it comes to a question of literary preferance, it is an argument of taste.
If you consider yourself to be a fan of Christopher, honour him by being a sceptic. If you start taking OPINIONS as the word of god, you are defeating Hitchens' entire point, by being no better than theists.
@HippieGuitarBoy woah calm down buddy boy. it just tickled me is all. dont worry i like nabokov too, however what he said in that interview was very interesting and amusing, its around 3.00 mins in in the video :
@lukeashmoore Pardon me. I was quite calm when typing my response. Looking back on the wording, I suppose it was a bit agressive. Once again, I beg your pardon.
Youtube seems to bring out some very belligerent people, so my responses may tend to form accusations at first.
Thank you very much for directing me to the video.
@lukeashmoore Actually, I think you misunderstood his point on Nabokov and Proust.
He wasn't dismissing them as authors. He simply points out that their elegance is so advanced that it discourages new writers, while Orwell encourages new writers, through a kind of modesty of intelligence.
Nabokov and Proust make it seem as though you need to be a genious to be a writer. Orwell proves that you don't, as long as you have a good, honest, logical point. He is complimenting all of them.
@HippieGuitarBoy dude, you need to stop taking this shit so seriously. You're writing lengthy critiques that actually turn into paragraphs over a minor comment i found to be amusing. please stop. thanks very much! :) x
@lukeashmoore dude, calm down. You're getting upset over how someone speaks. Chill, really.
The fact is, you misunderstood him. I'm just pointing that out, so you don't continue being wrong about that, and don't continue spreading your misunderstanding.
@HippieGuitarBoy hahhahahahahahhahahahahaahahhahahahahahhahahahahhaha Im gonna preach the word of the lord everywhere now! thats for being so annoying that i have seen the light!
@PenguinProseMedia I read his Orwell book. While I enjoyed it, the problem I have with his writing is that his prose can be a bit pompous at times. The words get in the way of the (often valid) point he is trying to make. There is a time and place for that kind of writing, but I find that simplicity in writing is more of a virtue than using big words and grand phrases.
As Orwell himself said in the Politics and the English Language, "If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out."
@mgm8822 I'll go a step further and say that Hitch is a loquacious thug who is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is...Reading his books sounds like a chore and a bore. This is pretty interesting because I find Orwell absolutely brilliant.
@PenguinProseMedia Martin Amis, the great friend of Hitchens, is no slouch in that department either. He seems to almost go out of his way to expand your vocabulary. I should also add that his books are outrageously humorous! I am listening to this in celebration of Kim Jong-Il's demise, a spectacle that I wish Hitch had lived a few days longer to witness. Hitch wasn't afraid of death, but he feared not being able to read the next day's paper; I feel the weight of that statement now.
I miss this guy. He was brilliant! I didn't agree with everything he said, but then who did?
benthejrporter 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've read a lot of Hitchens and know well of his adoration for Orwell. I've been so excited to start my English class's reading of Animal Farm, and we are beginning tomorrow. It would be beyond amazing to have Hitch teach our class!
makeorbreakgirlz 6 days ago
Comment removed
makeorbreakgirlz 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We demean each other thru the dogmatic strictures of animalism/animalitarianism ("atheism") in order: to deny Spiritualism; to wage total war; to value animals above humans; to commit clinician-assisted aborticide; to befoul the water w/fluoride & serums w/mercury; to becloud the air w/aluminum via tanker jets; to burn tumorous growths w/x-rays; to subject our hearts to allopathic diagnostics: radioactive dyes & Adrenalin-based stress tests; to venerate amoral men.
IconsOfTeleplay 1 month ago
Why do I get so giddy when an intellectual says a word like 'faggot'?
GiantSandles 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 5 months ago
7:07
"HA-Haw!"! Faggot!
DanielWarPig 5 months ago
Hitchens, ' God is not great' is one of my favourite books. For similar great thoughts try Dan Barker, John W. Loftus, Robert M Price, Valerie Tarico, Victor Stenger, Bart Ehrman, Ken Humphreys, Richard Carrier, Ken Pulliam, Keith Parsons, Gary Greenberg, Robert Ingersoll, Thomas Paine, Mark Twain, Earl Doherty, Israel Finkelstein, Daniel Dennett, C Dennis Mckinsey, Joseph Wheless, Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris,
zytigon 6 months ago
FYI: -there is nothing mystical about Geo.Orwell's book- "1984", --as it is a fact that he socialized with these criminal-elite agents of Rothschild/Rockefeller's et'al Jew-Zionists, --and unlike patriot Henry'Ford and Chas.Lindbergh, and St.Hitler, --whom tried to expose these subversives, Orwell simply wrote about the Jews sick-plans to enslave humanity via their zealous control of all Banks internationally, which is finally coming into fruition...!!!
AryanKnight 6 months ago
@AryanKnight
This is true. There's absolutely no way he could have envisaged so perfectly what was going to happen unless he himself knew those people who were in power and what their intentions were.
It's not surprising at all since he was a King's Scholar at Eton and also went to Wellington College (you can usually only get into Eton or Wellington if you're from the creme of the ultra-'elite', and those are the clique he was socialized into.
OrthodoxDarwinist 6 months ago
I think it's interesting that Orwell writes 1984 while he's dying of TB and Hitch dying of cancer seems to have that same spirit of continuing the fight right up to the bitter end.
SockbatReplica 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
That's a fine upload.
Merci beaucoup
'Bangkok Johnny' aka Carsanook
Royaume de Thailande
carsanookdotcom 1 year ago
Still against monarchy and church here in Spain..
TylerMcManus1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Orwell's major mistake was to wrongly predict that fascism in the future would arise from the right when in fact the victory of Russia and a sympathetic socialist British state in the war guaranteed that the next fascism we would face would be from the liberal-left. We now see in the United Kingdom a progressive-commuitarian marxist-Islamist state emerging. Modern Britain is a product of the Frankfurt school of cultural marxism. With groups of leftists shouting hate against nationalists.
statewithinastateuk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Orwell's major mistake was to wrongly predict that fascism in the future would arise from the right when in fact the victory of Russia and a sympathetic socialist British state in the war guaranteed that the next fascism we would face would be from the liberal-left. We now see in the United Kingdom a progressive-commuitarian marxist-Islamist state emerging. Modern Britain is a product of the Frankfurt school of cultural marxism. With groups of leftists shouting hate against nationalists.
statewithinastateuk 1 year ago
My most gracious thanks for this upload.
Ceolfrin 1 year ago
Damn, thought I was going to get an early night tonight...then I found this.
FreeInquisition 2 years ago 57
@FreeInquisition
happens to me all the time, lol
pml4010 1 year ago
A little bit off topic, but if you ever want to expand your vocabulary, read a Hitchens book. Yikes. I haven't come across an author who so deftly draws from such a vast repository of the english language.
PenguinProseMedia 2 years ago 24
Try JG Ballard :) Kinda like Hitchens, except fiction.
FreeInquisition 2 years ago
@FreeInquisition JG's Orwellian then, right? (not being vexatious)
diceyLee 1 year ago
@PenguinProseMedia You should read Vladimir Nabokov. He is also an outstanding linguist. When reading one of his books, you find you're actually reading two. You're reading his book, allong with a dictionary (or two, in the case of Lolita, where much of it is in French).
HippieGuitarBoy 1 year ago
@HippieGuitarBoy i love how your talking about nabokov when hitchens dismisses him in another orwell praising video. x
lukeashmoore 11 months ago
@lukeashmoore So? I'm not Hitchens' lap dog. I quite enjoy Nabokov's work. If Hitchens has an opinion to the conrary, then he has an opinion to the contrary. When it comes to a question of literary preferance, it is an argument of taste.
If you consider yourself to be a fan of Christopher, honour him by being a sceptic. If you start taking OPINIONS as the word of god, you are defeating Hitchens' entire point, by being no better than theists.
Cheers.
HippieGuitarBoy 11 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy woah calm down buddy boy. it just tickled me is all. dont worry i like nabokov too, however what he said in that interview was very interesting and amusing, its around 3.00 mins in in the video :
watch?v=5-rQlJie404&feature=related
lukeashmoore 11 months ago
@lukeashmoore Pardon me. I was quite calm when typing my response. Looking back on the wording, I suppose it was a bit agressive. Once again, I beg your pardon.
Youtube seems to bring out some very belligerent people, so my responses may tend to form accusations at first.
Thank you very much for directing me to the video.
HippieGuitarBoy 11 months ago
@lukeashmoore Actually, I think you misunderstood his point on Nabokov and Proust.
He wasn't dismissing them as authors. He simply points out that their elegance is so advanced that it discourages new writers, while Orwell encourages new writers, through a kind of modesty of intelligence.
Nabokov and Proust make it seem as though you need to be a genious to be a writer. Orwell proves that you don't, as long as you have a good, honest, logical point. He is complimenting all of them.
HippieGuitarBoy 11 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy dude, you need to stop taking this shit so seriously. You're writing lengthy critiques that actually turn into paragraphs over a minor comment i found to be amusing. please stop. thanks very much! :) x
lukeashmoore 11 months ago
@lukeashmoore dude, calm down. You're getting upset over how someone speaks. Chill, really.
The fact is, you misunderstood him. I'm just pointing that out, so you don't continue being wrong about that, and don't continue spreading your misunderstanding.
herp
HippieGuitarBoy 11 months ago
@HippieGuitarBoy hahhahahahahahhahahahahaahahhahahahahahhahahahahhaha Im gonna preach the word of the lord everywhere now! thats for being so annoying that i have seen the light!
lukeashmoore 11 months ago
@lukeashmoore Although I would love to see this video, out of interest, if you could direct me to it.
HippieGuitarBoy 11 months ago
@PenguinProseMedia If prolixity is your thing, I suggest you seek out anything written by Give Will Self a go.
JayinMovingPictures 1 year ago
@PenguinProseMedia I read his Orwell book. While I enjoyed it, the problem I have with his writing is that his prose can be a bit pompous at times. The words get in the way of the (often valid) point he is trying to make. There is a time and place for that kind of writing, but I find that simplicity in writing is more of a virtue than using big words and grand phrases.
As Orwell himself said in the Politics and the English Language, "If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out."
mgm8822 6 months ago
@mgm8822 I'll go a step further and say that Hitch is a loquacious thug who is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is...Reading his books sounds like a chore and a bore. This is pretty interesting because I find Orwell absolutely brilliant.
Kumrockme 6 months ago
@PenguinProseMedia So he uses big words.
owenline 3 months ago
@PenguinProseMedia Martin Amis, the great friend of Hitchens, is no slouch in that department either. He seems to almost go out of his way to expand your vocabulary. I should also add that his books are outrageously humorous! I am listening to this in celebration of Kim Jong-Il's demise, a spectacle that I wish Hitch had lived a few days longer to witness. Hitch wasn't afraid of death, but he feared not being able to read the next day's paper; I feel the weight of that statement now.
KeithWhalen11 2 months ago
@KeithWhalen11 Christopher Hitchens, R.I.P. The world has lost a brilliant mind and incredible communicator.
PenguinProseMedia 2 months ago
@KeithWhalen11 I was just about to comment and suggest that person read Martin Amis, but you beat me to it :) Happy holidays.
smooch0408 2 months ago
@smooch0408 Happy holidays!
KeithWhalen11 2 months ago
"Milosz is passing round a secret book within the inner party, which is about the passing around of a secret book within the inner party"
Good times.
tcrb2 2 years ago 3
Thanks for posting this.
rhblackburn 2 years ago
I really want to listen to this, but I'm not digging the distort
Anyone know how to fix that? Or am I the only one?
.......he..... helllo.....?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
yup, I'm the only one, fixed it
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Thank you for this marvelous piece!
Challuayacu 2 years ago