@ScoobySnaks1 I like that video because once again it confirms what I have been saying all along which is a chemtrail is a chemtrail and a contrail is a contrail. What they called a long contrail in the news report, looked just like a normal contrail that we were all use to seeing back then and before.
Nothing in your video showed the very long chemtrails which are seen in the sky today, such as in the following video:
@Skywitness - FAIL- they filmed a single short contrail that dissipated but what they were discussing were "long" persistent contrails that spread and covered the sky...sound familiar?
That is something Believers claim can't happen and never has....and is clearly a false belief.
if you want video of long contrails from the 50s- try these:
@ScoobySnaks1 Since you're here Scooby, do you care to explain how the low altitude chemtrail destroyed the Cumulus cloud in 45 seconds in this video which you are commenting on?
Hahahaha...they weren't talking about anything like this in your video which you posted.
@Skywitness - the contrail is CLEARLY much higher than the lower cloud...its is clearly seemingly stationary whilst the lower cloud clearly moves in front of the trail...its called perspective- do you have any?
You are either purposefully lying or just ignorant if you think the contrail is lower than the cloud.
@ScoobySnaks1 Your wilful blindness will not deliver you from the sting of clear-cut video evidence. Again...do you care to explain how the low altitude chemtrail destroyed the Cumulus cloud in 45 seconds in this video? That's 45 seconds Scoob.
@ScoobySnaks1 In 45 seconds the Cumulus cloud was destroyed by the low altitude chemtrail. Your fear is so rampant concerning this video evidence; why is that Scoob. Why are you afraid to admit to the fast destruction of that cloud by the chemtrail. Your fear is obvious.
@SkywitLess - Fear? Thats funny...no, its sadness at your intransigent ignorance mixed w/bemusement at your attempt to hide the fact that you know U R wrong
The low level cloud did dissipate...but thats not unusual..because clouds do dissipate..daily
The contrail that is clearly many thousands of feet above the cloud had nothing to do with it. thats ok...keep trying...U know you are grasping at straws.your desperation is apparent. Its funny to watch U crash&burn on your own vid
@ScoobySnaks1 YAWNnnn...explain why the Cumulus cloud dissipated in 45 seconds. Are you saying that the 45 second dissipation time is normal for Cumulus clouds?
Don't you wish you had never come over here....Hahahaha......
@SkywitLess -apparently you have never watched or studied clouds have you? Just exactly how long should it take for any cloud to dissipate?
Of course, you still haven't explained why you think the cloud is behind the contrail when it is clearly 1000s of feet below it...the cloud clearly blocks the trail from view indicating that he cloud is lower.
...on the contrary, I am quite glad I here and watching your ignorance and foolishness exposed on your very own video- quite enjoyable!
@SkywitLess .ummm,..no. the thin low cumulus cloud dissipated..as clouds do..it had nothing to to with the contrail 1000s of feet above it. No dancing. just cold, hard facts.
Tis you who is ignoring the truth, bobbing & weaving behind pedantic comments...avoiding the observed reality the the contrail is well above the cloud. refusing to explain why the cloud passes IN FRONT of the contrail indicating it is at a lower altitude...
@ScoobySnaks1 Your continuous mindless babbling shows that you've surrendered. It would have been less embarrassing for you however, if you would have shown a white flag instead. Nevertheless, I accept your surrender; now get lost and go do something constructive with your life.
@ScoobySnaks1 You're still here....LOL. I guess you're having a hard time adjusting to surrender. It's understandable but you really need to move on now because you're wasting time.
You need to start over by getting a job. I hear Micky Ds is hiring and Walmart is looking for a door greeter. Go for it...it's better than what you've been doing recently.
Everyone...take note of what the rogue elements in the government and the alphabet agencies do when there's video evidence of their chemtrail spraying operations that they don't want anyone to see.
They send a low paid disinfo shill such as scombrid2 to come out and try to muddy the waters hoping to distract people's attention away from the video evidence of the very low altitude chemtrail which destroys the Cumulus cloud. Just look at his comments.
Do you have video of the plane that left the trail so demonstrate that it was flying at the typical altitude of the Florida summer diurnal cumulus field of about 5000 feet instead of at the typical Florida summer contrail height of 30,000'+?
On second viewing that evaporating cumulus cloud actually looks like the 9-10 AM fog burn off that occurs before the typical durnal cumulus field develops. Typically below 2k feet. Plane would have been really low.
@scombrid2 You're desperately hilarious with the fog burn off excuse. You've really reached the bottom of the barrel for that one. Who writes your scripts, is it Patrick Minnis or one of the traitors in the USAF?
Funny it looks like a typical summer low altitude water cloud, probably below 5000ft with a high altitude contrail streak well above it. I notice a difference in their motion that can only be explained by their being at vastly different altitudes.
How do you verify your claims regarding the altitude of the cloud that you're viewing?
@scombrid2 LOL...the video evidence says you're wrong. Jet engine contrails don't form at the Cumulus cloud altitude not to mention below the Cumulus clouds. But your site does show evidence of you being just another failed disinfo shill.
Wow...first time I've seen this. On another note, I subbed to you a long time ago and somehow noticed that while I was watching this vid, I was no longer subbed to you. I know I never unsubbed...I wonder how the hell that happened and if there are more people that have somehow disappeared from my sub list?! Ever noticed or heard about this kind of thing before?
@DivinityBleu Hi....I haven't noticed that yet about being unsubbed to someone I was previously subbed to. But it doesn't surprise me if this sort of thing happens at times. I have noticed however that certain personel messages I gave out and received were deleted, but not by me. There's a few other things which have happened, even recently which I won't mention publicly, because I don't want whoever is doing this to know everything I'm aware of.
Yeah, I know about some of the other goings on too. Another thing I've noticed is that I often don't get notified about comments posted to my vids or replies to comments I've made on other people's videos. It gets frustrating. Keep up the good work on the vids, you're a dedicated watchdog.
here a is an NBC news report on "chemtrails"...from 1980:
watch?v=L6X5QZDQ6mw
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 I like that video because once again it confirms what I have been saying all along which is a chemtrail is a chemtrail and a contrail is a contrail. What they called a long contrail in the news report, looked just like a normal contrail that we were all use to seeing back then and before.
Nothing in your video showed the very long chemtrails which are seen in the sky today, such as in the following video:
"Another Comparison: Chemtrail Versus Contrail"
v=kodW75YLGdU
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - FAIL- they filmed a single short contrail that dissipated but what they were discussing were "long" persistent contrails that spread and covered the sky...sound familiar?
That is something Believers claim can't happen and never has....and is clearly a false belief.
if you want video of long contrails from the 50s- try these:
watch at 1:45
watch?v=heioZ_T78qw
Watch at 7:25 for a trail that looks IDENTICAL to the one you filmed here:
watch?v=p217RewRPsc
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 Try again Scoob....they're not the same.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - they are- in fact the amount of sky and thus the length of the trail is much longer than you show here...
but whatever...facts don't really matter to you- that much is clear.
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 Since you're here Scooby, do you care to explain how the low altitude chemtrail destroyed the Cumulus cloud in 45 seconds in this video which you are commenting on?
Hahahaha...they weren't talking about anything like this in your video which you posted.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - the contrail is CLEARLY much higher than the lower cloud...its is clearly seemingly stationary whilst the lower cloud clearly moves in front of the trail...its called perspective- do you have any?
You are either purposefully lying or just ignorant if you think the contrail is lower than the cloud.
Which is it?
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 Your wilful blindness will not deliver you from the sting of clear-cut video evidence. Again...do you care to explain how the low altitude chemtrail destroyed the Cumulus cloud in 45 seconds in this video? That's 45 seconds Scoob.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - there is no low altitude trail. Its a high altitude contrail. Nothing you can say can refute that fact. try as you might.
Please explain why the low cloud passes in front of the trail?
if you claim it doesn't you are either lying or ignorant- which is it.
Must suck to FAIL on your own video...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 In 45 seconds the Cumulus cloud was destroyed by the low altitude chemtrail. Your fear is so rampant concerning this video evidence; why is that Scoob. Why are you afraid to admit to the fast destruction of that cloud by the chemtrail. Your fear is obvious.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@SkywitLess - Fear? Thats funny...no, its sadness at your intransigent ignorance mixed w/bemusement at your attempt to hide the fact that you know U R wrong
The low level cloud did dissipate...but thats not unusual..because clouds do dissipate..daily
The contrail that is clearly many thousands of feet above the cloud had nothing to do with it. thats ok...keep trying...U know you are grasping at straws.your desperation is apparent. Its funny to watch U crash&burn on your own vid
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 YAWNnnn...explain why the Cumulus cloud dissipated in 45 seconds. Are you saying that the 45 second dissipation time is normal for Cumulus clouds?
Don't you wish you had never come over here....Hahahaha......
Skywitness 2 months ago
@SkywitLess -apparently you have never watched or studied clouds have you? Just exactly how long should it take for any cloud to dissipate?
Of course, you still haven't explained why you think the cloud is behind the contrail when it is clearly 1000s of feet below it...the cloud clearly blocks the trail from view indicating that he cloud is lower.
...on the contrary, I am quite glad I here and watching your ignorance and foolishness exposed on your very own video- quite enjoyable!
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago 2
@ScoobySnaks1 Still dancing around answering that 45 second question eh....you keep dancing Scoob...LOL.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@SkywitLess .ummm,..no. the thin low cumulus cloud dissipated..as clouds do..it had nothing to to with the contrail 1000s of feet above it. No dancing. just cold, hard facts.
Tis you who is ignoring the truth, bobbing & weaving behind pedantic comments...avoiding the observed reality the the contrail is well above the cloud. refusing to explain why the cloud passes IN FRONT of the contrail indicating it is at a lower altitude...
a hideous dance of ignorance and childishness
FAIL
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago 2
@ScoobySnaks1 Your continuous mindless babbling shows that you've surrendered. It would have been less embarrassing for you however, if you would have shown a white flag instead. Nevertheless, I accept your surrender; now get lost and go do something constructive with your life.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - You you admit you are wrong. Good job! Your finally making progress.
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 You're still here....LOL. I guess you're having a hard time adjusting to surrender. It's understandable but you really need to move on now because you're wasting time.
You need to start over by getting a job. I hear Micky Ds is hiring and Walmart is looking for a door greeter. Go for it...it's better than what you've been doing recently.
Skywitness 2 months ago
@Skywitness - ohhh good one Witless. more incessant blather to avoid the fact that your "low altitude" contrail really isn't.
Prattling on and on doesn't change the fact that the cloud passes 1000s of feet BELOW the contrail...as is confirmed in your video....
Another FAIL from the WitLess Wonder.
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@ScoobySnaks1 Remember to smile, and try to sound believable when you say, "Hi, welcome to Walmarrrrrrrt."
Skywitness 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Skywitness
ohhh good one Witless. more incessant blather to avoid the fact that your "low altitude" contrail really isn't.
Prattling on and on doesn't change the fact that the cloud passes 1000s of feet BELOW the contrail...as is confirmed in your video....
Another FAIL from the WitLess Wonder.
ScoobySnaks1 2 months ago
@Skywitness People are really that blind?? UNREAL!!!
dan32749 3 days ago
Everyone...take note of what the rogue elements in the government and the alphabet agencies do when there's video evidence of their chemtrail spraying operations that they don't want anyone to see.
They send a low paid disinfo shill such as scombrid2 to come out and try to muddy the waters hoping to distract people's attention away from the video evidence of the very low altitude chemtrail which destroys the Cumulus cloud. Just look at his comments.
Skywitness 5 months ago
Seriously, what is your explanation for the difference in apparent relative motion if not a great difference in altitude of the two formations?
scombrid2 5 months ago
""""Jet engine contrails don't form at the Cumulus cloud altitude"""""
Correct.
"""""" not to mention below the Cumulus clouds.""""""
Your video shows the opposite.
scombrid2 5 months ago
Do you have video of the plane that left the trail so demonstrate that it was flying at the typical altitude of the Florida summer diurnal cumulus field of about 5000 feet instead of at the typical Florida summer contrail height of 30,000'+?
On second viewing that evaporating cumulus cloud actually looks like the 9-10 AM fog burn off that occurs before the typical durnal cumulus field develops. Typically below 2k feet. Plane would have been really low.
scombrid2 5 months ago
@scombrid2 You're desperately hilarious with the fog burn off excuse. You've really reached the bottom of the barrel for that one. Who writes your scripts, is it Patrick Minnis or one of the traitors in the USAF?
Skywitness 5 months ago
Funny it looks like a typical summer low altitude water cloud, probably below 5000ft with a high altitude contrail streak well above it. I notice a difference in their motion that can only be explained by their being at vastly different altitudes.
How do you verify your claims regarding the altitude of the cloud that you're viewing?
scombrid2 5 months ago
There are probably about 25,000 vertical feet separating that contrail from the cumulus cloud.
scombrid2 5 months ago
@scombrid2 LOL...the video evidence says you're wrong. Jet engine contrails don't form at the Cumulus cloud altitude not to mention below the Cumulus clouds. But your site does show evidence of you being just another failed disinfo shill.
Skywitness 5 months ago
EXCELLENT . agent ernie will have to do the math on this'.
firstwave2 5 months ago
Wow...first time I've seen this. On another note, I subbed to you a long time ago and somehow noticed that while I was watching this vid, I was no longer subbed to you. I know I never unsubbed...I wonder how the hell that happened and if there are more people that have somehow disappeared from my sub list?! Ever noticed or heard about this kind of thing before?
DivinityBleu 5 months ago
@DivinityBleu Hi....I haven't noticed that yet about being unsubbed to someone I was previously subbed to. But it doesn't surprise me if this sort of thing happens at times. I have noticed however that certain personel messages I gave out and received were deleted, but not by me. There's a few other things which have happened, even recently which I won't mention publicly, because I don't want whoever is doing this to know everything I'm aware of.
Skywitness 5 months ago
@Skywitness
Yeah, I know about some of the other goings on too. Another thing I've noticed is that I often don't get notified about comments posted to my vids or replies to comments I've made on other people's videos. It gets frustrating. Keep up the good work on the vids, you're a dedicated watchdog.
DivinityBleu 5 months ago
Comment removed
DivinityBleu 5 months ago
Great video proof, my friend!
tankerenemy 5 months ago
@tankerenemy Thanks...
Skywitness 5 months ago
@Skywitness :-)
tankerenemy 5 months ago