i wonder if we will ever discover a way to split stable atoms effeciently and not just unstable atoms that makes up uranium and other elements with high radioactive decay. if we ever do it would mean we would have an entirely new and very clean energy source. although where very unlikely to see such a breakthrough in our life times
True Free energy devices exist,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
The equation itself isn't really that hard to derive either (no fancy mathematics), it's just the thought behind it was absolutely baffling. It's amazing how he actually thought about using relativity to relate energy and mass.
Hang on he said you get an awful lot of energy from a small amount of mass but what is this energy and how big or powerful is one unit of this energy?
@davefk one basic unit of energy is J ( joules). 1 J = 1 heart beat.. heart uses 1 J to beat once.... 1 J = N*m..so simply, if u provide certain amount of force to move an object foe some distance..u use energy and that basic unit of energy is called Joules...
This is a powerful stuff for all mankind.. Today scientist is trying to create ENERGY by smashing atoms together in a tunnel tube using Einstein's formula. We will have a burning fusion star just like our Sun...Crazy scientists replicating the power of the Sun.
no, but c, the speed of light, is such a big number that any mass for the fact that exist is equal to all that energi. if u could conver the TOTAL mass of an atom into energi it would be an aceptable number.actually u cant conver ALL the mass into energi but we make reactions in which lots of atoms lose a little of mass
If the reaction is really 100% efficient, then thats amazing because that would be breaking the laws of thermodynamics.
But I don't know if there were any real experiments done to prove that energy released from antimatter/matter collisions are 100% efficient. I assume they are only theories.
Honestly, I don't know the details of the equation, I'm a biology major. But to answer your question NO. I think it should be; the larger the mass, the more energy there is.
Raptor is right that you can't convert all mass into energy. And I think thats because of laws of thermodynamics, no energy transformation is 100% efficient
E = MC2
So if you increase the mass you increase the energy because energy is DIRECTLY proportional to mass according to this equation.
yea, its because of both second and first laws of thermodynamics^^. responding to millamulisha, i dont know if they are that efficient, sounds logic anyway but it doesnt mater, making anti mater is not an easy process and u cant store it in jars son it can not be used as a fuel just destoying matter
I see you are dutch. I supose you know europeans prefer to be called by nation, not by continent. You didn't payed attention to the dokomentary. I'm proud that Szilárd discovered atomic power. The germans (bad guys) would have discovered it anyway. I don't feel ashame on what Rosevelt did with a hungarian contrivance.
The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker.
@4:03 the girl is saying "I'd smash"
warrior152 3 months ago
Comment removed
warrior152 3 months ago
Comment removed
redslash1000 4 months ago
E-mc2 is dead...here's the new GIJ,J=0
SUNBLAKCARBON666 9 months ago
NAZI PUNKS!!! hehehe
omarbon23 1 year ago
i wonder if we will ever discover a way to split stable atoms effeciently and not just unstable atoms that makes up uranium and other elements with high radioactive decay. if we ever do it would mean we would have an entirely new and very clean energy source. although where very unlikely to see such a breakthrough in our life times
micheals1992 1 year ago
True Free energy devices exist,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
breeannaqktjbl 1 year ago
The equation itself isn't really that hard to derive either (no fancy mathematics), it's just the thought behind it was absolutely baffling. It's amazing how he actually thought about using relativity to relate energy and mass.
ChaosDynamics 1 year ago
how did he thought of that?!?! O.o..
P0H0A0N0T0O0M 1 year ago
Hang on he said you get an awful lot of energy from a small amount of mass but what is this energy and how big or powerful is one unit of this energy?
davefk 1 year ago
@davefk one basic unit of energy is J ( joules). 1 J = 1 heart beat.. heart uses 1 J to beat once.... 1 J = N*m..so simply, if u provide certain amount of force to move an object foe some distance..u use energy and that basic unit of energy is called Joules...
indiagreat2 1 year ago
@indiagreat2 Thank for the explanation!
davefk 1 year ago
This is a powerful stuff for all mankind.. Today scientist is trying to create ENERGY by smashing atoms together in a tunnel tube using Einstein's formula. We will have a burning fusion star just like our Sun...Crazy scientists replicating the power of the Sun.
JPHET37 1 year ago
@JPHET37 no their main goal is to study the big bang theory..
indiagreat2 1 year ago
does it mean the smaller the mass, the larger the energy could be? or what could be the concept? thanks youtubers!
yugiexodia 2 years ago
no, but c, the speed of light, is such a big number that any mass for the fact that exist is equal to all that energi. if u could conver the TOTAL mass of an atom into energi it would be an aceptable number.actually u cant conver ALL the mass into energi but we make reactions in which lots of atoms lose a little of mass
Raptor696969 2 years ago
an antimatter/matter collision is 100% efficient mass to energy reaction... crazy eh?
millamulisha 2 years ago 3
@millamulisha
If the reaction is really 100% efficient, then thats amazing because that would be breaking the laws of thermodynamics.
But I don't know if there were any real experiments done to prove that energy released from antimatter/matter collisions are 100% efficient. I assume they are only theories.
satchitananda24 2 years ago
Honestly, I don't know the details of the equation, I'm a biology major. But to answer your question NO. I think it should be; the larger the mass, the more energy there is.
Raptor is right that you can't convert all mass into energy. And I think thats because of laws of thermodynamics, no energy transformation is 100% efficient
E = MC2
So if you increase the mass you increase the energy because energy is DIRECTLY proportional to mass according to this equation.
Anybody correct if I'm wrong.
satchitananda24 2 years ago
antimatter/matter collisions
millamulisha 2 years ago
yea, its because of both second and first laws of thermodynamics^^. responding to millamulisha, i dont know if they are that efficient, sounds logic anyway but it doesnt mater, making anti mater is not an easy process and u cant store it in jars son it can not be used as a fuel just destoying matter
Raptor696969 2 years ago
no hon,it means dat u cud generate a large amount of energy,even if u have a small amount of:say a radioactive material.
its directly,not inversely proportional.
TheRockfog 2 years ago
No. E = M multiplied by C^2 (that's C squared), the larger M is the more energy there is.
ninjatoothpaste 1 year ago
@ninjatoothpaste ok now check ur units see if it make sence
mexico0106 1 year ago
@yugiexodia no. the larger the mass, the greater the energy.
Energy=(Mass)(speed of light)^2.
Let's take an object of 15 kg and plug it into the equation. Energy=(15)(speed of light)^2
Speed of light is 8.98755179 × 10^16 m^2 / s^2.
So our new equation would be Energy=(15)(89,875,517,900,000,000)
Therefore the Energy released, or J (Joules), is 1.34813277 × 10^18, or 1,348,132,770,000,000,000 J.
bondsmatthew 1 year ago
i wish i met Einstein but too bad he is dead i relly want him alive
coolcat998 2 years ago 2
Sun is Energy or mass or both???
electronfighter 2 years ago
that graffiti is beautyful wow
TheMarkc 2 years ago
wikipedia is never a reliable source buddy
SuperMel1988 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
World war 5 is close,
MysticREC 2 years ago
lol
0xNecrox0 2 years ago
Good
MadoXProductions 2 years ago
they should've mention Szilard was hungarian
sunofearth 3 years ago
As if it would have mattered that Szilárd was Hungarian. You wanted to be mentioned as "hungarian", now it is mentioned by you here.
By the way check this:
wikipedia:
"The Manhattan Project
Szilárd was directly responsible for the creation of the Manhattan Project."
I hope you're happy now for the people that died because your Hungarian mate discovered it.
VAPY27 3 years ago
I see you are dutch. I supose you know europeans prefer to be called by nation, not by continent. You didn't payed attention to the dokomentary. I'm proud that Szilárd discovered atomic power. The germans (bad guys) would have discovered it anyway. I don't feel ashame on what Rosevelt did with a hungarian contrivance.
sunofearth 3 years ago
Aye, so that we can all fight World War IV with rocks, n sticks may be
endlesssonata 2 years ago
Not unless we learn how to glow and stay alive at the same time.
D33veeoss 2 years ago
does it matter???
XxRobertPattzxX 2 years ago
At 4:55 the fact that this picture is real is scary. holy shit thats a lot of people.
brightscience 3 years ago
no part 3 :s
oryx032000 4 years ago 2
The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker.
Albert Einstein
anarchynotchaos 4 years ago 25
Where's part three???
missjetta123 4 years ago 2