synoptic black outs are A Type of reaction do to shots it's a type of Shock reaction to the system the self defense of the flight or fight responses, A Natural Atropine reaction as like the U.S. military uses in Bio Warfare with just 2's after injection, Note cases of Babies that have died from the reaction to as such like on set of infantile spasm "Epilepsy" and Septic shock after a reaction to the shots so was given.
Now How much can this go on to if a Drug is undercontrol of the FDA's standards 7 they know of a reaction they so Let Side then The rights of The 1st Amendment cannot be so rejected, Writ of Mandamus & U.S. Title 42 usc section 1983 & 85, Sanctum Mcgellium or Say the force Act or civil rights Act 1866-71 Or the views of the 9th Amendment And or the 14th as it stands and so on, right of redress of grievances shall not be Infringed
, So Let me guess The Drug Companies are seeking get out of The viewed reActions to squalene or this is the cover for the Forced Human micro Chip implant with out concent & its counter IIl fated Friend Amalgam
Why doesn't the Amish community have high rates of Autism or other health complications? They are not vaccinated, coincidence? Have you looked at the CDC website? They don't hide what ingredients the vaccines contain, but yet doctor's will say that thimerisol has been taken out of vaccines, when they have NOT!!! Our baby is not vaccinated and he is very healthy!
@TrifleMcFruity You can't prove a vaccine was the cause of someone not contracting a given disease. One can only speculate. Further, to say that they have not caused any illness or injury proves you haven't done any real research at all. There is enough information out there on the harms they have caused to take up a library. The CDC itself ha even issued reports where vaccines did harm. I respect a Pro vaccine position, but get your facts straight before you make statements like that.
autismsciencefoundation org/autismandvaccines html
You'll just dismiss them all as biased though you never read them & can't cite any specific examples of foul play bc you don't understand the science & robotically parrot what ideologues like Barb say w/o question. Many studies debunk the too much too soon myth too. You just keep moving the goalpost until your baseless vaccine accusations are impossible to disprove
It's already been explained when vaccine manufacturers are held accountable for vaccine injury. Why are you so afraid to read the decision for yourself before denouncing any court that would dare disagree w/ your ideology as a "kangaroo court"? Show me empirical proof they behaved unjustly.
You can tell the NVIC is honest by the way they disappear critical comments from their pg & then block critics from posting new ones
Once again, the Supreme Court absolutely did not shield drug companies from all liability caused by vaccines, That is a flat-out lie. The Court simply ruled that they can't be sued for unavoidable side effects as laid out in the ruling Barb hopes you don't read. Vax manufacturers are held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect
No Vaccine mfg will ever be responsible for a vaccine damaged child, period.
And trying to actually have your case tried in the Kangaroo court they call vaccine court is next to impossible.
The majority of reaction go unheard of, some that make it through are ridiculed and told "it is just a coincidence" and the few that actually make it through have to fight like hell to be heard.
Please just try and present me with a valid unbiased study that compares unvaccinated children against vaccinated children, you won't be able to and neither will any Pharma company. Further more there have been NO studies on any of the chemicals in vaccine's with the amount of vaccine's that are being administered at once.
This is another easy way to avoid having to answer so many question that parent have been asking.
Sure 2Mommy. It's explained in detail in the ruling Barbara desperately hopes you never read: rescuepost com/files/supreme-court-bruesewitz pdf
The ruling doesn't say those REALLY injured by vaccines are not entitled to sue for compensation, only that they can't sue the manufacturers. Instead, they must sue in the specially designated vaccine court for funds put aside specifically for these cases. “Big Pharma” must still obey laws & can’t injure people on purpose, as Barb would have you believe
Why not pass a law that protects our children and requires solid unbiased testing to be done and if in fact the vaccine's are proven to be unsafe then make them safe.
It is the least these companies and agencies can do if they are demanding our unwavering faith and trust.
Can you explain what would be an unavoidable side effect from a vaccine and what would be avoidable?
The fact stands that vaccine MFG claim that the chances of an adverse reaction is rare when in fact it is more common than most people are aware of and because of laws like this they can get away with avoiding unbiased studies and claiming that harm done to a child from a mandated vaccine was a "coincidence" .
I had fieldwork assignment for OT school at Burke Rehab in White Plains. Met a patient who became paralyzed shortly after having the booster shot for Tetanus. That did it for me. Never had another vaccine for anything after meeting her and hearing her story.
I guess that's proof positive that the goverment and big pharma are crooks and in bed together! After the 76 swine flu I swore I'd never take a shot again! BTW I didn't take that one either. My Navy Dr. told me not too!
synoptic black outs are A Type of reaction do to shots it's a type of Shock reaction to the system the self defense of the flight or fight responses, A Natural Atropine reaction as like the U.S. military uses in Bio Warfare with just 2's after injection, Note cases of Babies that have died from the reaction to as such like on set of infantile spasm "Epilepsy" and Septic shock after a reaction to the shots so was given.
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
Now How much can this go on to if a Drug is undercontrol of the FDA's standards 7 they know of a reaction they so Let Side then The rights of The 1st Amendment cannot be so rejected, Writ of Mandamus & U.S. Title 42 usc section 1983 & 85, Sanctum Mcgellium or Say the force Act or civil rights Act 1866-71 Or the views of the 9th Amendment And or the 14th as it stands and so on, right of redress of grievances shall not be Infringed
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
, So Let me guess The Drug Companies are seeking get out of The viewed reActions to squalene or this is the cover for the Forced Human micro Chip implant with out concent & its counter IIl fated Friend Amalgam
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
Why doesn't the Amish community have high rates of Autism or other health complications? They are not vaccinated, coincidence? Have you looked at the CDC website? They don't hide what ingredients the vaccines contain, but yet doctor's will say that thimerisol has been taken out of vaccines, when they have NOT!!! Our baby is not vaccinated and he is very healthy!
careyteacher 8 months ago
@careyteacher You are so right, more power to you
annes999 3 months ago
@TrifleMcFruity You can't prove a vaccine was the cause of someone not contracting a given disease. One can only speculate. Further, to say that they have not caused any illness or injury proves you haven't done any real research at all. There is enough information out there on the harms they have caused to take up a library. The CDC itself ha even issued reports where vaccines did harm. I respect a Pro vaccine position, but get your facts straight before you make statements like that.
Wraethrax 10 months ago
Comment removed
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
for everyone pissed off at these people, just remember evolution will take its due course and cleanse the pool.
anonynomnomnom 10 months ago
It's so ridiculous that one man's nearly entirely falsified (i.e. totally bollocks) study has brought about all this nonsense.
Vaccines save lives like crazy and NO ONE has offered any proof, or any reason to even suspect, that they cause illness or injury.
Get the hell over it!
TrifleMcFruity 10 months ago
If you needed any more proof that the US is a corporate fascist state this ruling ought to do it for you
rfalfonse 11 months ago 5
Hmm, your Website was Founded by Dr. Paul Offit who is directly related to Merck.
And so is the research that you are pointing me to.
Send me a link that is of an independent study with no financial ties and I will go through it.
It's also interesting that the mere debate of this subject leads you to cut me down with rude and condescending words, it is the bullies way.
I only have experienced the Pro Vaccine community to be such rude and arrogant people.
2MommyG 11 months ago 4
Numerous epidemiological studies compare vaccinated & unvaccinated populations
autismsciencefoundation org/autismandvaccines html
You'll just dismiss them all as biased though you never read them & can't cite any specific examples of foul play bc you don't understand the science & robotically parrot what ideologues like Barb say w/o question. Many studies debunk the too much too soon myth too. You just keep moving the goalpost until your baseless vaccine accusations are impossible to disprove
AtheistTeam 11 months ago
@AtheistTeam
Please send me the direct link to the studies of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated children you are talking of. I am incredibly interested to read them.
2MommyG 11 months ago
@AtheistTeam Good old Dr. Proffit, no conflicts of interest there eh?
dobyblue 11 months ago
It's already been explained when vaccine manufacturers are held accountable for vaccine injury. Why are you so afraid to read the decision for yourself before denouncing any court that would dare disagree w/ your ideology as a "kangaroo court"? Show me empirical proof they behaved unjustly.
AtheistTeam 11 months ago
You can tell the NVIC is honest by the way they disappear critical comments from their pg & then block critics from posting new ones
Once again, the Supreme Court absolutely did not shield drug companies from all liability caused by vaccines, That is a flat-out lie. The Court simply ruled that they can't be sued for unavoidable side effects as laid out in the ruling Barb hopes you don't read. Vax manufacturers are held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect
Viva La Truth!
JacksParasites 11 months ago
@JacksParasites
Viva la Truth?
No Vaccine mfg will ever be responsible for a vaccine damaged child, period.
And trying to actually have your case tried in the Kangaroo court they call vaccine court is next to impossible.
The majority of reaction go unheard of, some that make it through are ridiculed and told "it is just a coincidence" and the few that actually make it through have to fight like hell to be heard.
2MommyG 11 months ago
@JacksParasites
Please just try and present me with a valid unbiased study that compares unvaccinated children against vaccinated children, you won't be able to and neither will any Pharma company. Further more there have been NO studies on any of the chemicals in vaccine's with the amount of vaccine's that are being administered at once.
This is another easy way to avoid having to answer so many question that parent have been asking.
2MommyG 11 months ago
Sure 2Mommy. It's explained in detail in the ruling Barbara desperately hopes you never read: rescuepost com/files/supreme-court-bruesewitz pdf
The ruling doesn't say those REALLY injured by vaccines are not entitled to sue for compensation, only that they can't sue the manufacturers. Instead, they must sue in the specially designated vaccine court for funds put aside specifically for these cases. “Big Pharma” must still obey laws & can’t injure people on purpose, as Barb would have you believe
JacksParasites 11 months ago
Why not pass a law that protects our children and requires solid unbiased testing to be done and if in fact the vaccine's are proven to be unsafe then make them safe.
It is the least these companies and agencies can do if they are demanding our unwavering faith and trust.
2MommyG 11 months ago
@mjr256
Can you explain what would be an unavoidable side effect from a vaccine and what would be avoidable?
The fact stands that vaccine MFG claim that the chances of an adverse reaction is rare when in fact it is more common than most people are aware of and because of laws like this they can get away with avoiding unbiased studies and claiming that harm done to a child from a mandated vaccine was a "coincidence" .
2MommyG 11 months ago
I had fieldwork assignment for OT school at Burke Rehab in White Plains. Met a patient who became paralyzed shortly after having the booster shot for Tetanus. That did it for me. Never had another vaccine for anything after meeting her and hearing her story.
netnut7 11 months ago
I guess that's proof positive that the goverment and big pharma are crooks and in bed together! After the 76 swine flu I swore I'd never take a shot again! BTW I didn't take that one either. My Navy Dr. told me not too!
oldwarhorse1865 11 months ago 2