I study computer science - and our professor in signal processing class usually doesn't care much about explaining stuff - thinking in algorithms is much easier for me to understand than mathematic theory behind it.
Did anyone get this part: ".... by solving this differential equation at one frequency, omega, and turning it into an algebra equation I know the solution for all frequencies ..."?
@nemo21us Given a differential equation a*d^2f(t)/dt^2 + b*df(t)/dt + c*f(t) = 0. If I solve for the case f(t) = exp(j*w*t) then d^2f(t)/dt^2 = -w^2*exp(j*w*t) and df(t)/dt = j*w*exp(j*w*t). If I plug these in to the differential equation I can divide both sides by exp(j*w*t) to get -w^2*a + j*w*b + c = 0. Voila, algebra. Since I can make any f(t) from a sum of exp(j*w*t) due to the Fourier transform I solved my differential equation for *all* possible signals, f(t).
You are exactly describing the thing that is happening to me!! What I meant was about the brain shutting down, but eventually im overcoming it now....cheers! Fantastic lecturing style, love it...
You just have to believe deep down that there can be completely different ways of looking at the world that are equivalent. Our human bodies see the world as a series of moments in time. The physical world seems to act as a bunch of sinusoidal waves of different frequencies all happening at the same time. Fourier showed that both these views are equivalent.
@kridnix Very nice explanation. I'm a radiologist with a specialty in MRI. I've always thought of Fourier transform as a black box that processed the signals emitted from the relaxation of protons in a magnetic field after being excited by a radio frequency. I still don't understand it (after 20 years of study) but I feel I'm getting closer. Thanks.
"So let's understand, now that we've got the basics out of the way, how the Fourier transform REALLY works: Let's go in and see the mechanics of the bloody thing." This made my day :D
I have one quick question. If you change your function f(t) into a sum of sinusoids as you explain (2:19) and plug them into the diff. eqn you get a sum of the form:
SUM{ F(w)exp(jwt)*(-w^2-ajw+B) }=0
I dont see how this can be solved algebraically as was the case when we only had f(t)=F(w)exp(jwt).
So my question is how does this assist us in solving the diff eqn for an arbitrary function?
Hi Kridnix, Its a nice explanation..I have a a question for you...do you know some software free for integrals and science and engineering applications?
There probably is no good free software for such applications. Your best shot is get a ripped version of the program, or ask your local uni. for a program with their license.
Scilab is a great alternative for MATLAB, it has almost the same power.
I used it parallel to MATLAB in my DSP classes and it only doesn't work with IIR BP filters because it doesn't retrive enough numbers after decimal character.
I had to assume you know what differential equations are and also the properties of exponentials. So IMHO differential equations are a bitch to solve, you basically look up the solution. The Fourier transform allows you to solve differential equations using algebra relatively easily as long you have a solution of exp(iwt). This type of solution is a wave and frickin practically everything can be written as a sum of waves. Basically you have to accept the importance and prevalence of waves.
Instead of doing just one integral, we can just do two!
ap41591 6 days ago
lol. prepare for pain. My brain goes: "YAY! I'm gonna be a masochist today!"
TranceTips 2 weeks ago
"...you've experienced pain whenever you've seen integral signs..." quoted for truth
JustAnAdjunct 4 weeks ago
Thanks for uploading!!
MRTWW555 6 months ago
thanks. this is better than reading from books. though i have problems with the integrals. preparing for my post graduation and need to recall them
Anushsudha 9 months ago
excellent tutoring way !!
Doonskaia 1 year ago
Excellent! Very short and good lecture. Can you provide the similar lecture on the following topics.
Fourier Series.
Laplace Transform
Difference between Fourier and Laplace Transforms.
lrgopal2009 1 year ago
@lrgopal2009 I am working on a series on electromagnetics now, but I am taking a break from being a faculty member and so it is slow going.
kridnix 1 year ago
thanks for the video.
I study computer science - and our professor in signal processing class usually doesn't care much about explaining stuff - thinking in algorithms is much easier for me to understand than mathematic theory behind it.
Suyamu 1 year ago
not to be an idiot at the wrong time but 1:00 - 1:04 thats what she said
tatfr0guy 1 year ago
Did anyone get this part: ".... by solving this differential equation at one frequency, omega, and turning it into an algebra equation I know the solution for all frequencies ..."?
nemo21us 1 year ago
@nemo21us Given a differential equation a*d^2f(t)/dt^2 + b*df(t)/dt + c*f(t) = 0. If I solve for the case f(t) = exp(j*w*t) then d^2f(t)/dt^2 = -w^2*exp(j*w*t) and df(t)/dt = j*w*exp(j*w*t). If I plug these in to the differential equation I can divide both sides by exp(j*w*t) to get -w^2*a + j*w*b + c = 0. Voila, algebra. Since I can make any f(t) from a sum of exp(j*w*t) due to the Fourier transform I solved my differential equation for *all* possible signals, f(t).
kridnix 1 year ago 2
You are exactly describing the thing that is happening to me!! What I meant was about the brain shutting down, but eventually im overcoming it now....cheers! Fantastic lecturing style, love it...
thavamaran 1 year ago
"gah, prepare for pain!!!!!" hahaha
jimmyshitbags 1 year ago
You just have to believe deep down that there can be completely different ways of looking at the world that are equivalent. Our human bodies see the world as a series of moments in time. The physical world seems to act as a bunch of sinusoidal waves of different frequencies all happening at the same time. Fourier showed that both these views are equivalent.
kridnix 1 year ago
Unfortunately I am a physical optics guy. If I can find the time I might take a stab at those.
kridnix 1 year ago
@kridnix Very nice explanation. I'm a radiologist with a specialty in MRI. I've always thought of Fourier transform as a black box that processed the signals emitted from the relaxation of protons in a magnetic field after being excited by a radio frequency. I still don't understand it (after 20 years of study) but I feel I'm getting closer. Thanks.
rcaccese 1 year ago
why dont you do a explanation of jitter, ISI, BER etc...
system0system0 1 year ago
Thanks. I did these videos on a whim and I'm glad so many people find them useful.
kridnix 1 year ago
This is one of the most clear explanations of Fourier analysis I've seen, on Youtube or in lectures.
nashixe 1 year ago
Thanks for saying "forward" correctly. Forward is derived from "Fore" and "Ward" not from "Foe" and "Ward". Thanks.
wenaolong 1 year ago
"So let's understand, now that we've got the basics out of the way, how the Fourier transform REALLY works: Let's go in and see the mechanics of the bloody thing." This made my day :D
snorbaard777 1 year ago
Thank you Claude Shannon for making possible the information age
system0system0 2 years ago
I fell on the floor when he said 'Now, instead of one integral WE CAN DO TWO INTEGRALS' :DDD
kordets 2 years ago 8
dead~ prepare for pain~
lol
yyback 2 years ago
Hi Kridnix, Excellent video! Thank you.
I have one quick question. If you change your function f(t) into a sum of sinusoids as you explain (2:19) and plug them into the diff. eqn you get a sum of the form:
SUM{ F(w)exp(jwt)*(-w^2-ajw+B) }=0
I dont see how this can be solved algebraically as was the case when we only had f(t)=F(w)exp(jwt).
So my question is how does this assist us in solving the diff eqn for an arbitrary function?
Thank in advance.
ApteronotusL 2 years ago
Hi Kridnix, Its a nice explanation..I have a a question for you...do you know some software free for integrals and science and engineering applications?
Thank you..PJ
wrodusa2006 2 years ago
Not off the top of my head. I am a long time Matlab user so never had thet need to use any free software.
kridnix 2 years ago
There probably is no good free software for such applications. Your best shot is get a ripped version of the program, or ask your local uni. for a program with their license.
Pudersepp 2 years ago
@wrodusa2006 wolfram alpha
zoso95 1 year ago
@wrodusa2006 wolfram alpha
zoso95 1 year ago
@wrodusa2006
Scilab is a great alternative for MATLAB, it has almost the same power.
I used it parallel to MATLAB in my DSP classes and it only doesn't work with IIR BP filters because it doesn't retrive enough numbers after decimal character.
dramljak1 1 year ago
@wrodusa2006 Try GNU Octave, for sure that is not a Mathlab, but it is very fair for some activities.
leocmen 1 year ago
Thanks
pefirme 2 years ago
Spot on, as soon as i see differential or integral and weird signs i give up haha
taurus040588 2 years ago
thank you
ee04395 2 years ago
i don understand the second reason(differential equations and its significance) at 3.00.
rabinEXPRESSO 2 years ago
I had to assume you know what differential equations are and also the properties of exponentials. So IMHO differential equations are a bitch to solve, you basically look up the solution. The Fourier transform allows you to solve differential equations using algebra relatively easily as long you have a solution of exp(iwt). This type of solution is a wave and frickin practically everything can be written as a sum of waves. Basically you have to accept the importance and prevalence of waves.
kridnix 2 years ago
Thank you. At last I got an intuitive explanation that I had been searching for !!
vinvonvin 2 years ago
Thanks, I am a practicing engineer and this was a great refresher.
camel04 2 years ago
thanks for uploading this useful lecture.
pharloo 3 years ago