force rooted in justice didn't stop that mahogany mob; young White men with guns stopped the feral negros. That is the take away lesson. Negros go feral unless White men with guns and the willingness to use force intervene
"Force rooted in justice" is the one thing that can stop the mob---it's not as if jobs and racial equality would have. Typical conservative: ignore the root causes and attack the symptoms
@hatchbx The '92 riots were not about jobs and racial equality. They were about inner city African-Americans in L.A., at first, being angry about the acquittal of the police officers accused of violating Rodney King's civil rights. Then it became about simply tearing up their own neighborhoods and grabbing what loot they could grab; not to mention beating and killing any White person they saw. Jobs and racial equality do not come from the government; they must be earned.
Pat Buchanan was dead right about what Free Trade would do to the US economy wreck it, and what not building a new Hadrian's Wall, issuing a immigration moratorium, deportation of illegals, and then a reversal of the western civilization wrecking Hart -Celler Act, and reducing legal immigration to under 300,000 annually would to the US economy, culture, and society, multiculturalize it, and destroy it.
American Third Position Party! Tired of leftists and Neocons? Tired of people using words like racists and anti semite to try to silence their opponents? Tired of affirmative action? Tired of spending billions on upholding a overseas military empire? Tired of the illegal mestizo invasion of the USA?
Look no further than at the American Third Position Party! Take a look at their homepage at american3p . org and take a look at their videos here on youtube.
I'm an immigrant. Raised in America since I was 4. My parents taught us that we're AMERICAN. As an immigrant, I SUPPORT BUCHANAN since 1992 when I was 16.
He's been right about EVERYTHING!
It's time for hyphenated Americanism to end. Rampant culture decay, 34% babies out of wedlock. Then we wonder why we're so balkanized, why our entitlements are going bankrupt. One day, America will be sorry it didn't listen to Pat Buchanan. REALLY sorry. Sad to say.
buchanan is a great american and this country would be much better off if he had been president but what do you expect from the jewish controlled media
I like Pat Buchanan. I don't really agree with his hard-line protectionist ideas and I don't always like his stern cultural conservatism, but when it comes to fiscal issues and foreign policy, he is spot on. Republicans today need to listen to him, especially his military isolationism, which once was the hallmark of Republican foreign policy.
@virtuousvoice. Let me guess, you're a libertarian. Well, this prooves that there are many differences. Conservatives value culture. Libertarians value the individual. But what is the individual without his culture and social fabric?
@SturmUndDrang13 I am a Christian. Cultures come and cultures go, the world is full of cultures. In fact, I cringe when people say "I'm like soo into culture!" I just want people to be free, to learn from their mistakes, to become self-reliant, to respect others and not blame others for their own problems and not make others clean up their messes. Live free or die...and I pray that you all wake up and come to your senses someday! That's all I can do.
Pat Buchanan is an American Patriot. No one has stuck up for the American worker screwed by massive immigration and phony free trade like Pat has done. Have you joined Numbersusa yet. Join their million members that fax their Senators for free on immigration. Unlimited never ending immigratin is colonization. Join Numbersusa, no cost to join, only costs your country if you don't.
Probably because our country had became so liberal overtime that Buchanan doesn't appeal to most right wing conservatives.
They think that Pat Buchanan was too conservative. NOOOO! He should've got the Republican nomination in 1992. Our country needs that paleoconservatism and putting America first kind of attitude.
At 2:22 marker PB says "ready to lay down their lives to stop a mob from molesting people they did not even know"
Hey Pat, do you realize that your statement implies that it's better to molest people you do know? It makes me wonder if you speak from experience...hmm.
I think you're missing the point. He wasn't talking about the people who were planning to molest the elderly. He was talking about the soldiers who protected them. The quote from John praises the man who is willing to risk their life for a friend. Buchanan is pointing out that the soldiers didn't even know the people in the home, yet they were still willing to risk their lives for them, and that is truly great.
Typing in caps doesn't make you right, you east coast liberal prep school chino wearing penny loafer socialist schmuck.
U think us southern republicans are all racist rednecks. Believe it or not, 90% of southern state conservatives are TRUE family value, socially conscious, racially accepting, working class, and not only scoffed at Patty B - a poser through and through...but also, Bush (both of em), and even Reagan.
True southern conservatives are pre-Reagan republicans. before things went bad
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Buchanan was a nut case and a shame to the republican party. a radical masquerading as a true 'conservative'...thank god this racist fella with his eastern european tendencies is almost dead. long live the G.O.P! down with the fakers and posers like patty the putz buchanan!!!
You're a TEXAS CLOWN! Buchanan could have saved the down-spiraling GOP which is now a fucking SHELL thanks to clueless shithooks like you who allowed the goddamn LEFTIST NEOCONS to usurp the party and turn it into an 'INVITE THE WORLD, INVADE THE WORLD' WARMONGERING, DEGENERATE MOP OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL LIARS AND THIEVES. FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU ROAD IN ON, YOU BUSHITE TEXAS PIECE OF SHIT!
Pat Buchanan was a prophet, he predicted the loss of jobs and wages if NAFTA was passed. He called for a moratorium on immigration, to assimilate the millions we already had, he proposed a wall to stop illegal immigration and inhabit the flow of drugs & violence from mexico, there is now a guerilla war on the border with the drug cartels.
I am ashamed of the Republican & Democractic parties they are both corporate schills.
The GOP is dead in many areas, they are Fabian Socialists
@Bluegumsarepeople2 "I am ashamed of the Republican & Democractic parties they are both corporate schills." They always have been. Maybe you just don't like the American system? Novum nihilo sub solo. Reactionaries always believe they are living in unprecedented times.
Probably the most bizzare comment I've ever heard. Leif Erikson was a Catholic? Most of the founding Fathers were not Catholic,. though I get the impression that you most probably are.
Judeo-Christian values often are the values of bigotry. But, that aside, surely we do not need to infringe on someone's right to live a life that goes counter to other people's supposed values. Surely condescending attitudes towards Irish Catholics reflected the bigotry that we see today towards those groups that I mentioned. And, surely, if you are so impatiently tired of secular values in a nation with a secular constitution, perhaps you could try Iran. See how their religious values suit you.
Bigotry is all fun & games for some people until it hits home, until some notice that maybe you are a bit different too. Then bigotry seems less fun, less palatable. Arguments you use against other groups start to seem unfair when turned on you; after all, what did the colonists hate more than Catholicism? Founding Fathers were no great fans of it. Some traditional values are worth keeping. Some are not. Anti-Irish anti-Catholic are not good traditions. Neither is being anti-gay, anti-feminist.
Islamists? Where did Islam come from? Jefferson? Locke? Islam is an Abrahamic religion, founded on Judeo-Christian values. Jews & Christians are people of the book in Islam. Radical Islam battles secular democracy, secular demands for equality for women, gays and minorities.
Fascists/Nazis were quite willing to use religion to fit their propaganda needs. They signed concordats with the Vatican. Most Fascists/Nazis were Christians. All quite irrelevant, as is the fact that they were secularists
Churchill, FDR & Truman were secularists; what is your point?Washington,Jefferson, Franklin were secularists. They founded a secular nation based on Enlightenment principles. The U.S. is a majority Christian nation, but it's government is not founded on Christianity.
Anti-Catholic? Is it my imagination or did I not say that anti-Catholicism is bigoted & wrong? Odd. Your comments are increasingly inane & childish, perhaps demonstrating the reason why you are so fond of Republican talking points
listening to Pat on TV and reading his books has made me rethink my views. He is more often right than wrong, besides Ron Paul I respect no one more for telling unpopular truths.His enemies focus on his flaws and deny he has truths to speak and wish someome would shut him and his ideas up. No one can stop an idea whose time has come. Thanks Pat for your courage to speak what is on the mind of so many forgotten Americans that have no one to speak for them.
It was founded by British settlers. The Indians were a bunch of disparate, warring tribes who never conceived of anything remotely resembling "America." Non-British immigrants only began coming in large numbers well over 100 years after the republic was established. Some of their contributions have been positive, many others much less so. Irrespective, white racial concerns are every bit as valid as anyone else's -- even more so since they founded the country and are still its majority.
Yes you are correct spect8or making them immigrants ;) They emigrated over to America. I didnt know that there were Indians over in America before the British immigrants moved over :S Wonder what the native Americans thought of them
hawwy, there's a subtle but important difference. Immigrants come to a country that's already established. Settlers -- the British -- are the ones who established that country. The Indians can't complain too much: they were a bunch of disparate and continually warring tribes. The Navajo, for ex, killed and dispossessed other Indians to settle the territory they occupied only a few years before white settlers arrived. It's more complex than Indian=good, white=evil. Something to think about.
But it was their land to start off with. Theirs to do whatever the hell they like. The english went over and dismantled their culture. Just like you guys are complaining about with the immigrants of nowadays
What the British did to them they were already doing to themselves. There wasn't anything like a unified "Indian culture". They were forever at war with one another. That's not an "excuse" for the British did, it's a description. And the lesson that should be learned is not to let foreigners into your country in the first place. (Btw, the most recent evidence is that caucasians got to the Americas before Asians (ie "Indians") ever did, so whites win even on that score.)
HAHAHAH did you just say asians? HAHAHAHA so now from Indian as a dergatory term for native americans to actually them being asian. The phrase "Native American"? meaning they were Native to America
hawwy, they crossed the land bridge between the Eurasian continent (the far east asian part of it) some thousands of years ago. DNA tests confirm their genetic similarity to Asian races like various Siberian tribes. As I said, there is evidence that caucasians arrived even earlier, but died out. Obviously if any non-white group deserves special treatment in America it's the American Indians (that's NOT derogatory, it was simple misidentification) as well as, to a lesser extent, the negroes.
Borders don't make a country, the people within the borders do. There is a reason nobody wants to immigrate to Mexico or Africa, keep bringing these people in by the millions each year, and Mexico and Africa will have immigrated to you.
Ok, Rodney King became a symbol of racial injustice in LA, and the not-guilty verdicts were a breaking point in people's struggle against police racism. As traumatic as the LA riots were, it sounds as if Pat, by using the Convalescent Hospital as an example (true or not), is trying to characterize that rage as an assault against the weak and helpless, thereby dehumanizing the people involved in the underlying racial issue; which legitimizes conservative fear of people who are "different."
Well as I remember Pat's speech was the best speech of the entire '92 convention. This was evidenced by the fact that the so-called mainstream media said it was "mean".
You know, you could change the name Clinton in that speech to the name Obama and it would pretty much be true. ...except for the part about being married to Hillary! The only problem is that Obama makes Clinton look like a centrist.
It's really sad that you bunch of losers like Darcskies and the realkroysc don't want to see the truth. Our country's culture is being killed by people who have no problem with abortion, always apologizing for irresponsible people who destroy private property, etc. It is really sad to see such ignorance. Some day i hope you look back and see the weakness of your views.
The Windsor Hills Convalescent Hospital was attacked as part of the riots. It was the National Guard that saved the building and the occupants form an out of control mob of criminals that were rampant in the streets.
When Pat mentioned the "take back" he was referring to when the congress was controlled from the late 50s to the mid 90s by the Liberal democrats. This speech helped the GOP get it back.
Wallace Tope was a peaceful victim of the Riots. R.I.P.
Sorry but I doubt anybody is about to attack a bunch of old people in a riot that was mainly about police brutality and hypocrisy.
So your version is just one version but I wonder what the truth is. And as much as I respect Pat he is stilla republican in the end which means even when he speaks the truth it's automatically at least 55% BS
Pat wanted to take back the country from liberalism. For those 12 years of running the White House both houses of congress were controlled by the Democrats. Actually the party had the power of both wings of congress for over 3 decades from the late 50s to the mid 90s. Laughs on you buddy.
Thats true, plus he was also talking about popular culture and the spread of amorality. Buchanan tends to see everything in terms of morals and values
I don't know him so I can't tell you if he is a racist or not. He did say some stupid comments, I agree, but that doesn't mean Obama agrees with this. I am catholic and we don't like these hate speeches from either side(White or black). I am not a supermacist, just believe in live and let live without hurting any side.
The wealthiest one percent are usually called our employers. And god forbid you own a small business. Next time you go to Canada, and see that the $ 50.00 pair of nikes you like so much are really 80 bucks there, ask yourself if taxing the hell out of investmants and companies is a good idea. LOL.
Big breaks for business are a good idea, don't fall for the elitism of the left. When taxes are lowered and jobs are kept in the states, we all win. That's where Bush went wrong.
Probably realized the inherent racism of liberal slash democrat politics. He probably has a wife, children and a nice job and wants to keep what he earns.
The worst case scenario for democrats is the black community doing well and excelling . They will lose their base. There is nothing more the republican party wants than success in the black community.
stop the nonsense. bush "tax cuts" cut taxes for the wealthiest 1% of americans. that's a fact. most minorities are nowhere near the top 1%. therefore they don't support bush's conservative agenda. it has nothing to do with masked racism..
Republican conservatives= Collapsing US dollar MORE TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH WHO FUNNEL THEIR MONEY TO OFFSHORE BANK ACCOUNTS and aMERICAN (in name only)CORPORATIONS WHO GO TO SOUTH ASIA AND LATIN AMERICA FOR CHEAP LABOR DESTORYING THE JOBS IN AMERICA.
WHAT WONDERFUL REPUBCOCKSERVATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS. THE AMERICAN ECONOMY WIPED OUT THANKS TO REPUBLICAN NWO, CFR, CIA COLLUSION.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Pat Buchanan is extremely homphobic and racist. He is the most hateful person I've seen speaking. I'm astonished at the level of support he's getting in here. I'm Christian, but I am liberal. Liberals aren't looking for atention, except the Hollywood types. What's appalling is the level of support for his homophobic statements. I have to wonder if I'm the only liberal pro-gay Christian on this website.
buchanan is very well rounded and has unique input on economic, social, and foreign policy issues. Also, it is impossible for him to be homophobic, because he NEVER SCARED!
You call yourself a Christian? define Christian. One who follows the teaching of Jesus Christ.
Your definition of yourself as a Liberal Christian; I follow the teachings of Christ that I happen to agree with & ignore the scripture that I don't like.
You can't have it both ways. The Bible is clear on unrighteous sinful behavior. If you are saved, you strive to be righteous & avoid sin. However, you flaunt your sinful behavior (i.e. gay pride parade); you're unrepentant & obviously unsaved.
"Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. Then said Jesus unto his disciples...That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven...It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."
Please go ahead. Let's remind both the rich Republicans and Democrats that Jesus thinks they have a camel's chance of passing through a needle eye for getting into heaven. But I think the Republicans especially need this lesson...
The media would like you to believe the Republicans are rich and the Democrats are poor. This is NOT the case.
Please read Matthew 7:20-23, - verse 20 reads "...by their fruits ye shall know them." What fruits do you ask? Read Galatians 5:19-21. Who do you think these four verses describe?
Thank you for the feedback. I noticed that BrezhevIsMyCoPilot never replied back to my comments. There are more rich Democrats than Republicans but the media enforce the false belief that only Republicans are rich.
I just love how they twist scripture. To me, when I read Galatians 5:19-21 it sounds like the Democrat party and all of their evils. Take care,
What some people on here too young to remember is that Bush/Quayle were down about 30 points that night and after the Buchanan and Reagan speeches they surged to within 5 points of Clinton/Gore. So Buchanan's "hate speech" did no damage to the Republicans in 92. It was the anti-American media that distorted his message as always.
The ironic thing is, as extreme as Pat Buchanan sounds in this speech, he looks pretty clean. Look at him now. He looks old and is balding and just is a mess.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I admire Buchanan's willingness to go against the grain on issues of foreign policy and trade, but he's a fucking nativist and probably racist when it comes to immigration. And he's EXTREMELY homophobic deep down, which a lot of people don't know. He's VERY conservative socially, perhaps more so than most Republicans, despite his more liberal/paleocon stances on trade and foreign policy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i admire buchana too but you've given good reasons to take what he says with large grains of salt...and might i add as someone whoe great great grand father loaded cannons under sherman and helped burn atlanta to the ground to destroy the confederacy and the EVIL of slavery during the civil war..just the sight of that rebel flag is as offensive to me as the hammer and sickel or the nazi swastika..c'mon you lost we beat you we were stronger..perhaps it was gods will who knows?
What is offensive about the confederate battle flag? It is paying homage to the bravery of the confederate soldiers, many of whom were conscripted and forced to fight.
If it was the flag of the Confederate government, THEN you would have a point.
Also, his stances on trade and foreign policy are NOT liberal, they are as conservative as it gets. The republican neo-cons are the ones who have LIBERAL trade/foreign policy.
If being anti-gay or anti-gay rights is "christian", why don't you also carry out the other 10,000 or so regulations in "god's law" in the torah? You know, books like Deuteronomy and Numbers. You right-wing christians just pick and choose, like fake Christians. You CAN'T pick and choose!
If it's god's word, it's god's word everywhere, is it not? This is why I am not religious. I prefer to figure out right from wrong rather than rely on some outdated book that's full of shit.
In what book, chapter and verse does Jesus condemn homosexuality? In none. All the condemnations are either in the Old Testament or else made by Paul. Jesus addressed many virtues and sins but never condemned homosexuality. What does this tell us?
Really no one cares about liberals,they all ways want attention.I don't even waste my time half the time I see some of their ignorant comments.Thats why they will lose this election to McCain and both the house and senate.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
My first point is that the if Pat Buchanan could somehow peek back in time to witness what some of the founding fathers did in their spare time he would condemn them for engaging in immoral practices. My second point is that you can go fuck yourself. What does your comment even have to do with anything. You are the moron.
Pat is not the no one who is rewriting history. Pat is not the one who only tolerates those who agree with him.Also Pat doesn't care what we say about him on youtube.sorry for starting all my sentences the same.
MRCSA4LIFE knows nothing about America's founders. Example: Benjamin Franklin, a mason like all of the founders, was an occasional patron of Britain's hellfire club. He mocked Christianity. Check the facts.
I wish we had a man like Ron Paul as our leader, to stop the hundreds of thousands of anti-White hordes flooding into our country every single year, to stop unjust wars in which our brave troops are dying every day (I mean Iraq) and to stop the murder of unborn children that happens every single day.
It has everything to do with a decay in morality in this country, which is a problem. It is a non-racist opinion to say that Rodney King (multiple felon) and those who rioted were responsible for the 1992 Los Angeles Riots. No white conspiracy there, just people looking for an excuse to be criminals. Many honorable black Americans stayed out of rioting and even helped those who were hurt. But then again, Michael "Moron" Moore believes that K-Mart killed the kids at Columbine.
why do you people think that we gays want to destroy marriage?why do you hate us so much?why?is it because we seem too weak?or is it because we simbolize everything you fear about the future?
Because Buchanan represents the Old Right: the anti-war, small-government Republicans of old, who also uphold traditional institutions and cultural values. He has also been one of the most intelligent critics of the Bush administration since the beginning. IMO, he is also a great orator.
I wouldn't say it's totally lost but it is clear we have been fighting a loosing battle for the past century. I fear America will not long survive the 21st Century.
"special privileges"?.I see you're one of those hardcore conservatives.Why is it special when we ask for what you take for granted?And don't blame us for destroying marriage.You guys have done that already.
Because the Bible calls it a an abomination in the eyes of God. I don't hate gays but I still think it's wrong and wouldn't encourage anyone to be gay.
to'ebah, often translated "abomination", is a religious term, usually reserved for use against instances of idolatry. If the writer(s) of Leviticus wished to refer to a moral violation, a sin, he would have used the Hebrew word zimah.
to'ebah, often translated "abomination", is a religious term, usually reserved for use against instances of idolatry. If the writer(s) of Leviticus wished to refer to a moral violation, a sin, he would have used the Hebrew word zimah.
I'm sorry to attack you with reason, but you're inconsistent with your comments. In one, you condemn a group for asking for special privileges, then later, you justify legal discrimination based on a book only given credence by a particular group without foundation (no, faith does not count).
To me you're asking for those who believe in the bible to be given special privileges by having their beliefs codified into law.
This nation was founded by Christians. To deny this is to deny history and reality. Homosexuality is an immoral lifestyle and shouldn't be promoted or endorsed in any way.
had to add the god bless you and god bless America part at the end.
cinsana88 1 week ago
force rooted in justice didn't stop that mahogany mob; young White men with guns stopped the feral negros. That is the take away lesson. Negros go feral unless White men with guns and the willingness to use force intervene
stonelifter63 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a fucking idiot
communistsam2012 2 months ago
Go Pat Go
josephvr777 2 months ago in playlist More videos from MRCSA4LIFE
one of HIS best speeches
fallflies 4 months ago in playlist Pat Buchanan- convention 1992
"Force rooted in justice" is the one thing that can stop the mob---it's not as if jobs and racial equality would have. Typical conservative: ignore the root causes and attack the symptoms
hatchbx 4 months ago
@hatchbx The '92 riots were not about jobs and racial equality. They were about inner city African-Americans in L.A., at first, being angry about the acquittal of the police officers accused of violating Rodney King's civil rights. Then it became about simply tearing up their own neighborhoods and grabbing what loot they could grab; not to mention beating and killing any White person they saw. Jobs and racial equality do not come from the government; they must be earned.
dmreeoogdaq 1 month ago
Pat Buchanan was dead right about what Free Trade would do to the US economy wreck it, and what not building a new Hadrian's Wall, issuing a immigration moratorium, deportation of illegals, and then a reversal of the western civilization wrecking Hart -Celler Act, and reducing legal immigration to under 300,000 annually would to the US economy, culture, and society, multiculturalize it, and destroy it.
Bluegumsarepeople2 5 months ago
Does this millionaire own a pitchfork?
Tsnore 7 months ago
"Force, rooted in justice, and backed by moral courage."
chinsanyt 10 months ago 8
I love how he ends on an inspiring image of near-race war.
palotin07 1 year ago 5
When will America be the America I grew up in again
american1476 1 year ago
@american1476 never. leave and go somewhere else. this country needs people who have the wherewithall to grow and change - not remain stagnant.
CrissieP1 5 months ago
They should have used grapeshot in Compton
EsClayWilson 1 year ago
American Third Position Party! Tired of leftists and Neocons? Tired of people using words like racists and anti semite to try to silence their opponents? Tired of affirmative action? Tired of spending billions on upholding a overseas military empire? Tired of the illegal mestizo invasion of the USA?
Look no further than at the American Third Position Party! Take a look at their homepage at american3p . org and take a look at their videos here on youtube.
The American Third Position Party!
wijse 1 year ago 2
Pat if you are out there reading is somewhere, you are not too old to run again. The nation desperately needs you.
SupportOurWounded 1 year ago
@SupportOurWounded Buchanan 2012
american1476 1 year ago
@american1476 Don't think he's thinking about it just yet,but theres hope.
DDUKEthetruthatlast 1 year ago
A true conservative, Pat Buchanan. America needs leaders like that. Not Obama's and Bush's
SturmUndDrang13 1 year ago 2
@lombard34 radical feminists...
wade2bosh 1 year ago
Listening to the liberal talking points I see.
americanromancatholi 1 year ago
This whole speech is right on but the end especially! We must TAKE BACK AMERICA!
USARightPatriot1 1 year ago
I'm an immigrant. Raised in America since I was 4. My parents taught us that we're AMERICAN. As an immigrant, I SUPPORT BUCHANAN since 1992 when I was 16.
He's been right about EVERYTHING!
It's time for hyphenated Americanism to end. Rampant culture decay, 34% babies out of wedlock. Then we wonder why we're so balkanized, why our entitlements are going bankrupt. One day, America will be sorry it didn't listen to Pat Buchanan. REALLY sorry. Sad to say.
MPDLR 1 year ago 2
buchanan is a great american and this country would be much better off if he had been president but what do you expect from the jewish controlled media
steve2885321 1 year ago
I like Pat Buchanan. I don't really agree with his hard-line protectionist ideas and I don't always like his stern cultural conservatism, but when it comes to fiscal issues and foreign policy, he is spot on. Republicans today need to listen to him, especially his military isolationism, which once was the hallmark of Republican foreign policy.
virtuousvoice 2 years ago 16
@virtuousvoice. Let me guess, you're a libertarian. Well, this prooves that there are many differences. Conservatives value culture. Libertarians value the individual. But what is the individual without his culture and social fabric?
SturmUndDrang13 1 year ago 2
@SturmUndDrang13 I am a Christian. Cultures come and cultures go, the world is full of cultures. In fact, I cringe when people say "I'm like soo into culture!" I just want people to be free, to learn from their mistakes, to become self-reliant, to respect others and not blame others for their own problems and not make others clean up their messes. Live free or die...and I pray that you all wake up and come to your senses someday! That's all I can do.
virtuousvoice 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pat Buchanan is an American Patriot. No one has stuck up for the American worker screwed by massive immigration and phony free trade like Pat has done. Have you joined Numbersusa yet. Join their million members that fax their Senators for free on immigration. Unlimited never ending immigratin is colonization. Join Numbersusa, no cost to join, only costs your country if you don't.
Pass the message along.
rocketsredglare101 2 years ago
As someone said earlier, Pat Buchanan is the reason that Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992.
dino0967 2 years ago
Probably because our country had became so liberal overtime that Buchanan doesn't appeal to most right wing conservatives.
They think that Pat Buchanan was too conservative. NOOOO! He should've got the Republican nomination in 1992. Our country needs that paleoconservatism and putting America first kind of attitude.
We're heading towards communism.
NYJared04 2 years ago 8
@NYJared04 The country has moved far to the right. If Pat Buchanan ran for president today he'd be tarred as a radical leftist.
framptonorchablis 1 year ago 4
@NYJared04 fascism or authoritarian more likely
DRisLegend200919 1 year ago
At 2:22 marker PB says "ready to lay down their lives to stop a mob from molesting people they did not even know"
Hey Pat, do you realize that your statement implies that it's better to molest people you do know? It makes me wonder if you speak from experience...hmm.
eyejudgeeverything 2 years ago
I think you're missing the point. He wasn't talking about the people who were planning to molest the elderly. He was talking about the soldiers who protected them. The quote from John praises the man who is willing to risk their life for a friend. Buchanan is pointing out that the soldiers didn't even know the people in the home, yet they were still willing to risk their lives for them, and that is truly great.
ar223 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who is this CLown? buchannan..isnt he the crazy old man on MSNBC?...lol.tragic
antropoloscar 2 years ago
Typing in caps doesn't make you right, you east coast liberal prep school chino wearing penny loafer socialist schmuck.
U think us southern republicans are all racist rednecks. Believe it or not, 90% of southern state conservatives are TRUE family value, socially conscious, racially accepting, working class, and not only scoffed at Patty B - a poser through and through...but also, Bush (both of em), and even Reagan.
True southern conservatives are pre-Reagan republicans. before things went bad
TexanHardRepublican 2 years ago
So how do you feel about gay rights? Female rights? Where does that fit in to your "southern republican" landscape?
driftingdrought 2 years ago
No, it makes you a stereotypist, as you so wonderfully revealed before even making a point.
All you need is a social stigma, a flag, to set you off, without having read a thing.
CelicetheGreat 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Buchanan was a nut case and a shame to the republican party. a radical masquerading as a true 'conservative'...thank god this racist fella with his eastern european tendencies is almost dead. long live the G.O.P! down with the fakers and posers like patty the putz buchanan!!!
TexanHardRepublican 2 years ago
You're a TEXAS CLOWN! Buchanan could have saved the down-spiraling GOP which is now a fucking SHELL thanks to clueless shithooks like you who allowed the goddamn LEFTIST NEOCONS to usurp the party and turn it into an 'INVITE THE WORLD, INVADE THE WORLD' WARMONGERING, DEGENERATE MOP OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL LIARS AND THIEVES. FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU ROAD IN ON, YOU BUSHITE TEXAS PIECE OF SHIT!
19Truth53 2 years ago 2
Pat Buchanan was a prophet, he predicted the loss of jobs and wages if NAFTA was passed. He called for a moratorium on immigration, to assimilate the millions we already had, he proposed a wall to stop illegal immigration and inhabit the flow of drugs & violence from mexico, there is now a guerilla war on the border with the drug cartels.
I am ashamed of the Republican & Democractic parties they are both corporate schills.
The GOP is dead in many areas, they are Fabian Socialists
NAU
Bluegumsarepeople2 2 years ago 19
@Bluegumsarepeople2 "I am ashamed of the Republican & Democractic parties they are both corporate schills." They always have been. Maybe you just don't like the American system? Novum nihilo sub solo. Reactionaries always believe they are living in unprecedented times.
silentcal72 1 year ago
It's not about taking America back, but bringing it forward armed with the best of our past.
peddler66 2 years ago 4
Probably the most bizzare comment I've ever heard. Leif Erikson was a Catholic? Most of the founding Fathers were not Catholic,. though I get the impression that you most probably are.
MJMedin 2 years ago
Comment removed
lombard34 2 years ago
Comment removed
ForzaJersey 2 years ago
Judeo-Christian values often are the values of bigotry. But, that aside, surely we do not need to infringe on someone's right to live a life that goes counter to other people's supposed values. Surely condescending attitudes towards Irish Catholics reflected the bigotry that we see today towards those groups that I mentioned. And, surely, if you are so impatiently tired of secular values in a nation with a secular constitution, perhaps you could try Iran. See how their religious values suit you.
lombard34 2 years ago
Bigotry is all fun & games for some people until it hits home, until some notice that maybe you are a bit different too. Then bigotry seems less fun, less palatable. Arguments you use against other groups start to seem unfair when turned on you; after all, what did the colonists hate more than Catholicism? Founding Fathers were no great fans of it. Some traditional values are worth keeping. Some are not. Anti-Irish anti-Catholic are not good traditions. Neither is being anti-gay, anti-feminist.
lombard34 2 years ago
Comment removed
ForzaJersey 2 years ago
Comment removed
ForzaJersey 2 years ago
Islamists? Where did Islam come from? Jefferson? Locke? Islam is an Abrahamic religion, founded on Judeo-Christian values. Jews & Christians are people of the book in Islam. Radical Islam battles secular democracy, secular demands for equality for women, gays and minorities.
Fascists/Nazis were quite willing to use religion to fit their propaganda needs. They signed concordats with the Vatican. Most Fascists/Nazis were Christians. All quite irrelevant, as is the fact that they were secularists
lombard34 2 years ago
Churchill, FDR & Truman were secularists; what is your point?Washington,Jefferson, Franklin were secularists. They founded a secular nation based on Enlightenment principles. The U.S. is a majority Christian nation, but it's government is not founded on Christianity.
Anti-Catholic? Is it my imagination or did I not say that anti-Catholicism is bigoted & wrong? Odd. Your comments are increasingly inane & childish, perhaps demonstrating the reason why you are so fond of Republican talking points
lombard34 2 years ago
Comment removed
ForzaJersey 2 years ago
Comment removed
lombard34 2 years ago
One of the greatest political speeches of all time.
itpduder 3 years ago
makes me want to cry...he did what he could to save our country...it can't be reversed now...immorality rules and socialism will prevail
mrboast 3 years ago
Thanks for this video.
listening to Pat on TV and reading his books has made me rethink my views. He is more often right than wrong, besides Ron Paul I respect no one more for telling unpopular truths.His enemies focus on his flaws and deny he has truths to speak and wish someome would shut him and his ideas up. No one can stop an idea whose time has come. Thanks Pat for your courage to speak what is on the mind of so many forgotten Americans that have no one to speak for them.
mrhulot101 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You guys do know that America was founded by Immigrants, Your ancestors were immigrants. Unless your native american
hawwy1987 3 years ago
It was founded by British settlers. The Indians were a bunch of disparate, warring tribes who never conceived of anything remotely resembling "America." Non-British immigrants only began coming in large numbers well over 100 years after the republic was established. Some of their contributions have been positive, many others much less so. Irrespective, white racial concerns are every bit as valid as anyone else's -- even more so since they founded the country and are still its majority.
spect8or 3 years ago 2
Yes you are correct spect8or making them immigrants ;) They emigrated over to America. I didnt know that there were Indians over in America before the British immigrants moved over :S Wonder what the native Americans thought of them
hawwy1987 3 years ago
hawwy, there's a subtle but important difference. Immigrants come to a country that's already established. Settlers -- the British -- are the ones who established that country. The Indians can't complain too much: they were a bunch of disparate and continually warring tribes. The Navajo, for ex, killed and dispossessed other Indians to settle the territory they occupied only a few years before white settlers arrived. It's more complex than Indian=good, white=evil. Something to think about.
spect8or 3 years ago 2
But it was their land to start off with. Theirs to do whatever the hell they like. The english went over and dismantled their culture. Just like you guys are complaining about with the immigrants of nowadays
hawwy1987 3 years ago
What the British did to them they were already doing to themselves. There wasn't anything like a unified "Indian culture". They were forever at war with one another. That's not an "excuse" for the British did, it's a description. And the lesson that should be learned is not to let foreigners into your country in the first place. (Btw, the most recent evidence is that caucasians got to the Americas before Asians (ie "Indians") ever did, so whites win even on that score.)
spect8or 3 years ago 2
HAHAHAH did you just say asians? HAHAHAHA so now from Indian as a dergatory term for native americans to actually them being asian. The phrase "Native American"? meaning they were Native to America
hawwy1987 3 years ago
hawwy, they crossed the land bridge between the Eurasian continent (the far east asian part of it) some thousands of years ago. DNA tests confirm their genetic similarity to Asian races like various Siberian tribes. As I said, there is evidence that caucasians arrived even earlier, but died out. Obviously if any non-white group deserves special treatment in America it's the American Indians (that's NOT derogatory, it was simple misidentification) as well as, to a lesser extent, the negroes.
spect8or 3 years ago 3
Borders don't make a country, the people within the borders do. There is a reason nobody wants to immigrate to Mexico or Africa, keep bringing these people in by the millions each year, and Mexico and Africa will have immigrated to you.
blackjack9911 3 years ago
Ok, Rodney King became a symbol of racial injustice in LA, and the not-guilty verdicts were a breaking point in people's struggle against police racism. As traumatic as the LA riots were, it sounds as if Pat, by using the Convalescent Hospital as an example (true or not), is trying to characterize that rage as an assault against the weak and helpless, thereby dehumanizing the people involved in the underlying racial issue; which legitimizes conservative fear of people who are "different."
DarkHorse2083 3 years ago
Well as I remember Pat's speech was the best speech of the entire '92 convention. This was evidenced by the fact that the so-called mainstream media said it was "mean".
You know, you could change the name Clinton in that speech to the name Obama and it would pretty much be true. ...except for the part about being married to Hillary! The only problem is that Obama makes Clinton look like a centrist.
dmreeoogdaq 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why do blacks complain about this country but asians and hispanics come here and actually succeed? The African culture is an inferior culture.
210please 3 years ago
It's really sad that you bunch of losers like Darcskies and the realkroysc don't want to see the truth. Our country's culture is being killed by people who have no problem with abortion, always apologizing for irresponsible people who destroy private property, etc. It is really sad to see such ignorance. Some day i hope you look back and see the weakness of your views.
RepNationalist7 3 years ago
It must be nice to be blind.
The Windsor Hills Convalescent Hospital was attacked as part of the riots. It was the National Guard that saved the building and the occupants form an out of control mob of criminals that were rampant in the streets.
When Pat mentioned the "take back" he was referring to when the congress was controlled from the late 50s to the mid 90s by the Liberal democrats. This speech helped the GOP get it back.
Wallace Tope was a peaceful victim of the Riots. R.I.P.
therealkroysc 3 years ago 3
Sorry but I doubt anybody is about to attack a bunch of old people in a riot that was mainly about police brutality and hypocrisy.
So your version is just one version but I wonder what the truth is. And as much as I respect Pat he is stilla republican in the end which means even when he speaks the truth it's automatically at least 55% BS
darcskies777 3 years ago
wow, I was tearing up at the end
PrinceChewy 3 years ago
Pat wanted to take back the country from liberalism. For those 12 years of running the White House both houses of congress were controlled by the Democrats. Actually the party had the power of both wings of congress for over 3 decades from the late 50s to the mid 90s. Laughs on you buddy.
therealkroysc 3 years ago
Thats true, plus he was also talking about popular culture and the spread of amorality. Buchanan tends to see everything in terms of morals and values
danoftherepublic 3 years ago
because everything has its basis in moral values. We are an amoral country and will pay a price for it. Obama is a sign of the times.
210please 3 years ago
What you and other conservatives consider moral are social standards, rather than personal responsibility and morality, which is relevatism.
PhiloCentinel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a Nazi hack. If there is a hell Buchanan will be there!
waveali 3 years ago
Mr. Latino Supremacist, tell us all , get on the record its a simple yes or no question, in your Opinion is rev. Wright a Racist ?
2connection 3 years ago
I don't know him so I can't tell you if he is a racist or not. He did say some stupid comments, I agree, but that doesn't mean Obama agrees with this. I am catholic and we don't like these hate speeches from either side(White or black). I am not a supermacist, just believe in live and let live without hurting any side.
Rmauricio69 3 years ago
Yea but same thing can be said about Pat here, You dont know and never met BUCHANAN so how is he a Racist when you dont him either ?
You sound kinda like a Hypocrite on this ya know
2connection 3 years ago
The wealthiest one percent are usually called our employers. And god forbid you own a small business. Next time you go to Canada, and see that the $ 50.00 pair of nikes you like so much are really 80 bucks there, ask yourself if taxing the hell out of investmants and companies is a good idea. LOL.
Big breaks for business are a good idea, don't fall for the elitism of the left. When taxes are lowered and jobs are kept in the states, we all win. That's where Bush went wrong.
sakuraba13 3 years ago
Amen, and well said on all parts. I live 10 minutes from Canada. Taxes are everywhere!!!
b5kalad 3 years ago
What the Fuck a black guy doing in these conventions!!!!!!
Rmauricio69 3 years ago
Probably realized the inherent racism of liberal slash democrat politics. He probably has a wife, children and a nice job and wants to keep what he earns.
The worst case scenario for democrats is the black community doing well and excelling . They will lose their base. There is nothing more the republican party wants than success in the black community.
sakuraba13 3 years ago
stop the nonsense. bush "tax cuts" cut taxes for the wealthiest 1% of americans. that's a fact. most minorities are nowhere near the top 1%. therefore they don't support bush's conservative agenda. it has nothing to do with masked racism..
elsuspekkto 3 years ago
Black people at a Republican convention? They woke up and left the plantation!!! That is why they are there? Please wake up before it is too late!!!!
b5kalad 3 years ago
thanks a million and bless you for making this classic available! in the bonds of the Old South,
rocksmeller99 3 years ago
Comment removed
PresidentMJB 3 years ago 3
Word up ! Fuck those neocon bastards! The republican party needs a renaissance of conservative values, practical foreign policy and less spending.
sakuraba13 3 years ago
Kristol = internationalist Moderate Liberal phony
2connection 3 years ago
Please God make Jesus be black.
farnium 3 years ago
Dat Nigga Be CrAzY!! SHiiieat
pontifex08 3 years ago
What a great president he would have made!
Kuettner 3 years ago
bill kristol can be seen at about 1.03 watching the speech from the floor, he's clearly enjoying it LOL
david1965af 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Republican conservatives= Collapsing US dollar MORE TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH WHO FUNNEL THEIR MONEY TO OFFSHORE BANK ACCOUNTS and aMERICAN (in name only)CORPORATIONS WHO GO TO SOUTH ASIA AND LATIN AMERICA FOR CHEAP LABOR DESTORYING THE JOBS IN AMERICA.
WHAT WONDERFUL REPUBCOCKSERVATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS. THE AMERICAN ECONOMY WIPED OUT THANKS TO REPUBLICAN NWO, CFR, CIA COLLUSION.
spotZsp00k 3 years ago
Truth!
amarrao95 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Pat Buchanan is extremely homphobic and racist. He is the most hateful person I've seen speaking. I'm astonished at the level of support he's getting in here. I'm Christian, but I am liberal. Liberals aren't looking for atention, except the Hollywood types. What's appalling is the level of support for his homophobic statements. I have to wonder if I'm the only liberal pro-gay Christian on this website.
mythbuster43 3 years ago
buchanan is very well rounded and has unique input on economic, social, and foreign policy issues. Also, it is impossible for him to be homophobic, because he NEVER SCARED!
lsucowboys99 3 years ago
You call yourself a Christian? define Christian. One who follows the teaching of Jesus Christ.
Your definition of yourself as a Liberal Christian; I follow the teachings of Christ that I happen to agree with & ignore the scripture that I don't like.
You can't have it both ways. The Bible is clear on unrighteous sinful behavior. If you are saved, you strive to be righteous & avoid sin. However, you flaunt your sinful behavior (i.e. gay pride parade); you're unrepentant & obviously unsaved.
FightBadBehavior 3 years ago
Amen, You tell it like it is!!! Keep up the good faith.
b5kalad 3 years ago
boy, are your faces going to be red when you find out Refafu is god
nickypeeps 3 years ago
You can NOT be a Christian and be a liberal OR pro-gay.
b5kalad 3 years ago
Jesus was considered a Liberal in his time.
sp113 3 years ago
As silk willy would say it depends on how you define "is" is?
Also, all those thought to be a messiah back 2,000 were killed. Jesus was just one of many for about a 300 year span.
If I remember correctly, did Jesus say:
Tax the rich over half?
Abort babies?
Gay lifestyle is good?
Send your children to a government run school and teach them nothing?
To worship the environment?
I do NOT remember reading any of this?
The arabs believe Jesus was a palestinian. No true either.
b5kalad 3 years ago
Luke 18:21-25
"Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. Then said Jesus unto his disciples...That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven...It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
Also, regarding luke 18:21-25 - Please inform all in Hollywood, Al Gore, and the Clinton's. They have more money than you can think.
b5kalad 3 years ago
Please go ahead. Let's remind both the rich Republicans and Democrats that Jesus thinks they have a camel's chance of passing through a needle eye for getting into heaven. But I think the Republicans especially need this lesson...
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
The media would like you to believe the Republicans are rich and the Democrats are poor. This is NOT the case.
Please read Matthew 7:20-23, - verse 20 reads "...by their fruits ye shall know them." What fruits do you ask? Read Galatians 5:19-21. Who do you think these four verses describe?
b5kalad 3 years ago
You sir, are correct!
sakuraba13 3 years ago
Thank you for the feedback. I noticed that BrezhevIsMyCoPilot never replied back to my comments. There are more rich Democrats than Republicans but the media enforce the false belief that only Republicans are rich.
I just love how they twist scripture. To me, when I read Galatians 5:19-21 it sounds like the Democrat party and all of their evils. Take care,
b5kalad 3 years ago
What some people on here too young to remember is that Bush/Quayle were down about 30 points that night and after the Buchanan and Reagan speeches they surged to within 5 points of Clinton/Gore. So Buchanan's "hate speech" did no damage to the Republicans in 92. It was the anti-American media that distorted his message as always.
dukie11 3 years ago 5
True. You are correct. I am 41 and remember those days.
b5kalad 3 years ago
thanks for the video. unfortunately i didn't make it to the dumbass ignorant idiot convention that year.
toiletsrus 3 years ago
Because Jesus invalidates most of the laws from the old law. You dont know anything about Christianity.
sizzle2 3 years ago
The ironic thing is, as extreme as Pat Buchanan sounds in this speech, he looks pretty clean. Look at him now. He looks old and is balding and just is a mess.
Whoo69 3 years ago
well duh...............that was 16 years ago!
jurisdude 3 years ago
sooo crazy
jedimetroid 3 years ago
Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan is a great American patriot. He's a wonderful asset, and a voice of reason in an age of madness.
peddler66 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I admire Buchanan's willingness to go against the grain on issues of foreign policy and trade, but he's a fucking nativist and probably racist when it comes to immigration. And he's EXTREMELY homophobic deep down, which a lot of people don't know. He's VERY conservative socially, perhaps more so than most Republicans, despite his more liberal/paleocon stances on trade and foreign policy.
Whoo69 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i admire buchana too but you've given good reasons to take what he says with large grains of salt...and might i add as someone whoe great great grand father loaded cannons under sherman and helped burn atlanta to the ground to destroy the confederacy and the EVIL of slavery during the civil war..just the sight of that rebel flag is as offensive to me as the hammer and sickel or the nazi swastika..c'mon you lost we beat you we were stronger..perhaps it was gods will who knows?
get over it.
revengeofcleveland 3 years ago
What is offensive about the confederate battle flag? It is paying homage to the bravery of the confederate soldiers, many of whom were conscripted and forced to fight.
If it was the flag of the Confederate government, THEN you would have a point.
Subjugator1866 3 years ago
it was stop playing childish games
revengeofcleveland 3 years ago
great job masterfully disregarding all of my points, you sure showed me...
Subjugator1866 3 years ago 2
the conferate flag stands for slavery and is a symbol used by segregationists anti cathoic
religios zealots racists..evangelical cutlists
and the ku klux klan
revengeofcleveland 3 years ago
He isnt homophobic, its called being Christian.
Also, his stances on trade and foreign policy are NOT liberal, they are as conservative as it gets. The republican neo-cons are the ones who have LIBERAL trade/foreign policy.
Subjugator1866 3 years ago 4
If being anti-gay or anti-gay rights is "christian", why don't you also carry out the other 10,000 or so regulations in "god's law" in the torah? You know, books like Deuteronomy and Numbers. You right-wing christians just pick and choose, like fake Christians. You CAN'T pick and choose!
If it's god's word, it's god's word everywhere, is it not? This is why I am not religious. I prefer to figure out right from wrong rather than rely on some outdated book that's full of shit.
Whoo69 3 years ago
1. never said i was Christian.
2. the new testament cancels out a lot of the old testament.
3. homosexuality is irrefutably anti-Christian.
Subjugator1866 3 years ago
In what book, chapter and verse does Jesus condemn homosexuality? In none. All the condemnations are either in the Old Testament or else made by Paul. Jesus addressed many virtues and sins but never condemned homosexuality. What does this tell us?
Interlingua 3 years ago
This tells us that since he did not mention it, he agrees with the old testament on this subject and did not need to amend it.
Subjugator1866 3 years ago
Is that just like the prohibition from eating shrimp? Since Jesus said nothing about it it should still be prohibited?
Also, since Jesus did not address the OT references to slavery, does that mean he agreed with the OT on the suject and we sahould still have slaves?
sp113 3 years ago
Great speech, all of it true.
Pat would have made a great President.
Stevo343 3 years ago 2
"Force, rooted in justice, and backed by moral courage." Powerful and inspiring...where is such principled statesmanship today?
PresidentMJB 3 years ago 5
Really no one cares about liberals,they all ways want attention.I don't even waste my time half the time I see some of their ignorant comments.Thats why they will lose this election to McCain and both the house and senate.
lilsteller 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fat, lazy, ignorant scum.
thomas181818 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My first point is that the if Pat Buchanan could somehow peek back in time to witness what some of the founding fathers did in their spare time he would condemn them for engaging in immoral practices. My second point is that you can go fuck yourself. What does your comment even have to do with anything. You are the moron.
thomas181818 3 years ago
God bless Buchanan.
slavophile1 3 years ago 5
lol, I always love libs who bash buchanan; the truth is, he's a lot smarter than almost all of them - and really doesn't give a shit what they think.
susdlnskafw 3 years ago 9
Pat is not the no one who is rewriting history. Pat is not the one who only tolerates those who agree with him.Also Pat doesn't care what we say about him on youtube.sorry for starting all my sentences the same.
ECash08 4 years ago
MRCSA4LIFE knows nothing about America's founders. Example: Benjamin Franklin, a mason like all of the founders, was an occasional patron of Britain's hellfire club. He mocked Christianity. Check the facts.
thomas181818 4 years ago
He also mocked Britain while living in France. What is your point moron?
ThatsmyYokoOno 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Word to the wise; never listen to someone with no neck. No way no how.
thomas181818 4 years ago
Just to let you know..
George Bush went up in the polls 10 points the following day. Everyone should have thanked Buchanan instead of criticizing him.
speakmymind01 4 years ago 3
Pat is the man.
CalculatorTyrant 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I am English and I love America.
It is the greatest nation on Earth.
I wish we had a man like Ron Paul as our leader, to stop the hundreds of thousands of anti-White hordes flooding into our country every single year, to stop unjust wars in which our brave troops are dying every day (I mean Iraq) and to stop the murder of unborn children that happens every single day.
bigscolari 4 years ago
It has everything to do with a decay in morality in this country, which is a problem. It is a non-racist opinion to say that Rodney King (multiple felon) and those who rioted were responsible for the 1992 Los Angeles Riots. No white conspiracy there, just people looking for an excuse to be criminals. Many honorable black Americans stayed out of rioting and even helped those who were hurt. But then again, Michael "Moron" Moore believes that K-Mart killed the kids at Columbine.
ReaganBush8084 4 years ago 4
So I guess anything's possible.
ReaganBush8084 4 years ago
why do you people think that we gays want to destroy marriage?why do you hate us so much?why?is it because we seem too weak?or is it because we simbolize everything you fear about the future?
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago 3
yeah,what he said.
why?
evilrightwing 4 years ago
I'm gay and a huge supporter of Buchanan.
algabal 4 years ago 2
why?!
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
Because Buchanan represents the Old Right: the anti-war, small-government Republicans of old, who also uphold traditional institutions and cultural values. He has also been one of the most intelligent critics of the Bush administration since the beginning. IMO, he is also a great orator.
algabal 4 years ago 6
i hope you ment the republican party of berry goldwater.republican of arizona.senator.those republicans are ok.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
I'm straight and a huge supporter of Buchanan.
Userduder 4 years ago 3
See, liberals have an inherent advantage: they appeal to the base passions, to mere emotion - to the lowest regions of the soul.
Jitpring 4 years ago
Sadly, we've lost the culture war. This is becoming increasingly clear.
Jitpring 4 years ago 7
I wouldn't say it's totally lost but it is clear we have been fighting a loosing battle for the past century. I fear America will not long survive the 21st Century.
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
the enemy isn't who you think it is.
it's not us.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
we aren't your enemy
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
who have you lost to?just answer that.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
The Marxist Left who would have a secularized America
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
i don't know what to say to that.describe this "secularized America".do you think that we filty homosexuals want anything more than to be left alone?
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
Then leave us alone is what we ask and quit demanding special privileges.
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
"special privileges"?.I see you're one of those hardcore conservatives.Why is it special when we ask for what you take for granted?And don't blame us for destroying marriage.You guys have done that already.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
I never have said that. I just believe homosexuality is wrong and shouldn't be promoted or condoned in any way.
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
please tell me why it's wrong?
i really want to understand you guys.
and don't forget that you brought up the issue of "special privileges".what i said after that was just an ad-on.
please tell me why you think it's wrong.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
Because the Bible calls it a an abomination in the eyes of God. I don't hate gays but I still think it's wrong and wouldn't encourage anyone to be gay.
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
to'ebah, often translated "abomination", is a religious term, usually reserved for use against instances of idolatry. If the writer(s) of Leviticus wished to refer to a moral violation, a sin, he would have used the Hebrew word zimah.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
to'ebah, often translated "abomination", is a religious term, usually reserved for use against instances of idolatry. If the writer(s) of Leviticus wished to refer to a moral violation, a sin, he would have used the Hebrew word zimah.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
MRCS4LIFE
I'm sorry to attack you with reason, but you're inconsistent with your comments. In one, you condemn a group for asking for special privileges, then later, you justify legal discrimination based on a book only given credence by a particular group without foundation (no, faith does not count).
To me you're asking for those who believe in the bible to be given special privileges by having their beliefs codified into law.
simonlegree 4 years ago
This nation was founded by Christians. To deny this is to deny history and reality. Homosexuality is an immoral lifestyle and shouldn't be promoted or endorsed in any way.
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
Very true!
bfuenz 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shut up you fucking southern redneck conservative hick RepubliKKKan idiot.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago