@Elliotvisualeffects You make a very significant point when you say: "But isn't the problem itself Women doing these things." Absolutely. Why do they do it?
This is most obvious with women denying fathers access to their children and false allegations of abuse.
In the film on Father's Rights, Bob Geldof says that if fathers had the legal powers and not mothers, then they would probably behave in the same harmful way.
I disagree. Men, in general, are not like that. It's not in male nature.
I came across this looking for information for a friend and I have to say you hit the nail on the head. This law is taken advantage by certain women to take a husbands money and gain custody of their children. Furthermore, this is a sign of the times any question of women's rights or actions is meet with fierce opposition. We are the new taget no matter what, this is why I never ask a woman to move in because they could with all reason get you kicked out of your own apartment or home. Insane
The Police policy in my area to domestic violence is to separate the two parties to prevent an escalation of the incident. As an aside most are alchohol fuelled. The logic being you are preventing a possible murder. What was stipulated was that you must whenever possible remove the aggressor from the property, do not go immediately for the man. No complaint needs to be made, one party doesn't have to "press charges" you split them up intil they cool down/sober up.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the examples of a significant other "PLAYFULLY" slapping the behind of her significant other "who didnt mind"- does not compare to being touched unwantedly. I think the VO: is Ignorant to experiences by using such far opposites comparison.
@loraeve You are mistaken. If you actually watch this segment properly, you will understand why the clip was used. But to make it even clearer for you, if you were to "PLAYFULLY" slap the behind of a stranger, you have committed a what's called a 'sexual assault', whether the person "didn't mind" or not. This example is used to specifically address Harriet Harman's ludicrous statement equating domestic violence with street violence.
On the one hand, you have vindictive and opportunistic women who are being coached on how to manipulate the biased system.
But there are also women who are unwilling to see themselves as victims, or their male partners as monsters/abusers. They are simply told that they are wrong, as they are coerced, intimidated, and abused by the system.
They have plenty of carrots for nasty women, and plenty of sticks for brave or honest women.
They must either pose as victims, or be victimized.
An excellent piece of film, I actually swore off stupidity when I was 7.
Its amazing to see the amount of people who are emotionally unstable, the media portrays it as "being human."
The truth of the matter is people who can only say "it.. was.. sad", "I.. am/was.. scared" have the mentality of 2 year olds who are unable to convey anything more than the emotions they felt at one time.
@anikinippon, should has nothing to to with the equation. Praising him would imply that feminist stand on the principal of their premise and value anything more then their rhedorick and getting free shit off the backs of men.
It sucks that you have so few views.
TheLordmep 3 months ago
@Elliotvisualeffects You make a very significant point when you say: "But isn't the problem itself Women doing these things." Absolutely. Why do they do it?
This is most obvious with women denying fathers access to their children and false allegations of abuse.
In the film on Father's Rights, Bob Geldof says that if fathers had the legal powers and not mothers, then they would probably behave in the same harmful way.
I disagree. Men, in general, are not like that. It's not in male nature.
manwomanmyth 3 months ago
The answer to the question at 4:00 is sucking dick...thank you and good night.
DoItYouWont100 3 months ago
the women make it to these positions cause the govt wants people like this in those positions
kevwayne007 1 year ago
I came across this looking for information for a friend and I have to say you hit the nail on the head. This law is taken advantage by certain women to take a husbands money and gain custody of their children. Furthermore, this is a sign of the times any question of women's rights or actions is meet with fierce opposition. We are the new taget no matter what, this is why I never ask a woman to move in because they could with all reason get you kicked out of your own apartment or home. Insane
Heyooooo007 1 year ago
The Police policy in my area to domestic violence is to separate the two parties to prevent an escalation of the incident. As an aside most are alchohol fuelled. The logic being you are preventing a possible murder. What was stipulated was that you must whenever possible remove the aggressor from the property, do not go immediately for the man. No complaint needs to be made, one party doesn't have to "press charges" you split them up intil they cool down/sober up.
taffwob 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this has happened to me
bedillman 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the examples of a significant other "PLAYFULLY" slapping the behind of her significant other "who didnt mind"- does not compare to being touched unwantedly. I think the VO: is Ignorant to experiences by using such far opposites comparison.
loraeve 1 year ago
@loraeve You are mistaken. If you actually watch this segment properly, you will understand why the clip was used. But to make it even clearer for you, if you were to "PLAYFULLY" slap the behind of a stranger, you have committed a what's called a 'sexual assault', whether the person "didn't mind" or not. This example is used to specifically address Harriet Harman's ludicrous statement equating domestic violence with street violence.
The only ignorance here is yours.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 15
U r a genious man, weldone.
seyxlondon 1 year ago
Man u are a genious.
seyxlondon 1 year ago
what sad is most women know &agree.
this is no a conspiracy the truth ask a lesbian
MrMrbobblehead 2 years ago
Sir,
You do excellent work.
I salute you!
1woozoo 2 years ago 8
5 stars one video a day and i have enjoyed all of them!
uratrick 2 years ago 8
On the one hand, you have vindictive and opportunistic women who are being coached on how to manipulate the biased system.
But there are also women who are unwilling to see themselves as victims, or their male partners as monsters/abusers. They are simply told that they are wrong, as they are coerced, intimidated, and abused by the system.
They have plenty of carrots for nasty women, and plenty of sticks for brave or honest women.
They must either pose as victims, or be victimized.
St37One 2 years ago 14
An excellent piece of film, I actually swore off stupidity when I was 7.
Its amazing to see the amount of people who are emotionally unstable, the media portrays it as "being human."
The truth of the matter is people who can only say "it.. was.. sad", "I.. am/was.. scared" have the mentality of 2 year olds who are unable to convey anything more than the emotions they felt at one time.
anarchyfever 2 years ago 18
feminst will hate your guts for this.
ORVX 2 years ago 13
Surely not.
manwomanmyth 2 years ago 5
@manwomanmyth
Being hated by feminists is the litmus test of sound ethics.
Hzqi 1 year ago 5
@Hzqi I don't care how long ago you posted this, this was fucking brilliant.
Roflcopter4b 4 months ago
@ORVX They should be praising him
anikinippon 2 years ago
@anikinippon, should has nothing to to with the equation. Praising him would imply that feminist stand on the principal of their premise and value anything more then their rhedorick and getting free shit off the backs of men.
ORVX 2 years ago 4