During the bit where the space man gets pulled up by the wire, you can see the dirt falling quickly as if there is no "moon gravity". And that bit of vid looks as if it were slowed down. Hey that could most definitely add to the moon-walking effect if done correctly! Too bad Nasa sucks with getting rid of their screwy cuts w/ wires and all.
@OrgoneHawker My near conclusion has been that Nasa has indeed gone to the moon, but their publicly released footage may have been a contingency plan, and probably there to distract from any extra plans they had for their space exploration at that time.
Can you please sound a little more serious please? Im really interested in why our country did this and your bullshit video is making it sound stupid.
mate great video. I want to believe you i RLY RLY do! but what do you say for the fact that russia never mentioned a thing about usa not getting there? i mean they were up in arms back then!
Best Conspiracy video ever ...fock yeah mate you did a very good job ; ) ...there are so many evidences today evryone with half an brain knows that there is a lot of shit going on with nasa photos !....i did a lot of research about those things because im not such a idiot who believes evrything and trusts evryone but there are some really really strange things i found maybe i will make a homepage about it !! ...but seriously this guy knows what he is talking about !
Everyone brings up mythbusters proved was prove a couple of theories and maybe they are both pretty smart but if they were faked they were done Stanley Kubrick and that guy knew how to make films he could've done it easily also NASA gave him a special lens for 2001 worth a fortune,
@iloveponteporn science disproved your video, and only whacked out conspiracy theorist believe it. I'm just here to hate on dummies that can't use google.
@0185funkmaster: the light from the sun(1) that light, reflected on the moon(2), light reflected from earth(3) your a fucking idiot. Go google you some learning about the moon. BTW, you the placed special mirrors on the moon to reflect lasers to measure the EXACT distance. Go watch Mythbusters, those guise couldn't fake a moon landing with modern equipment.
and by the way, those "wires" are reflections from sunlight. Hence why the "wires" arent lines, but ovals.
I'm not gonna stick around and argue, because you clearly are wrong, but I would recommend reading a book called "Bad Astronomy" which examines the "moon hoax" for a chapter. It's full of great information from a third party on the actual physics and analysis of a few photographs.
@Crawford429 The one who need the huge telescope is Nasa, not us. So, the book called "Bad Astronomy" is written by phil plait? Where did I heard the name..Hmm.
@4real4real217 wow, a carefully worded documentary offered biased alternative theories and beamed them out across the media networks for all to see. Of course their correct, you typed in UPPERCASE (far superior to lower case) and everyone knows you can never dispute something written in capitols..... its the law.
Fabric still shakes with no atmosphere. THERE IS NO VIDEO OF A FLAG SHAKING THAT ISN'T BEING PHYSICALLY MANIPULATED.
Ever hear of LENS FLARE, with three light sources, reflective visors to protect the eyes of astronauts from UNFILTERED FUCKING SOLAR RAYS, lens flare is COMMON in space.
Oh and since there's one SIXTH earths gravity, they weigh about 30 pounds plus 10 for the suits.
You do know we put special mirrors in EXACT spots so we can beam lasers up and get the exact
it's jagged, that AND THE FACT THAT THERE IS ONE SIXTH(1/6) the earths gravity. Makes foot prints more visible. The BROUGHT BACK LUNAR DUST!!! that shit doesn't fall to earth. Use GOOGLE YOU FUCKING RETARD.
that was funny.....but you missed one, when you started on the moonrocks...did you know that a moon rock that was given to the Netherlands by US was recently tested and it was Petrified wood...ha ha...looks as if VonBoner got some Wood in Antarctica by mistake.
@yourmajezty The most powerful telescope in the World orbiting the Earth can't see any evidence of NASA landing on the Moon. But you can see some with your cheap telescope from you backyard?
@timrocket2008 Don't you think a moon rock that has been burnt up through entering the earths atmosphere would even be slightly different than one taken off the moons surface? Go back to school.
In Hollywood they always mark the Center of the stage with a letter C on a stage prop and on the floor.
What are the chances that two letter C on the floor and the rock are hairs both perfectly shaped as the letter C?
Why the hell did NASA's Top Rocket Scientist, in the Middle of the Moon Race, go to collect hundreds of pounds of Moon Rocks? He was caught by Journalists in 1967. In the middle of the Moon Race!
They are only called Moon rocks because they are the same meteorites found in Antarcti
Nonsense. A-naut work is dangerous. 27 of 400,000 people. Suspicious? All blueprints NOT lost. Important docs still exist. Why save blueprints for obsolete bolt or switch? 2 lights? Where's the 2nd shadow? Flag DESIGNED to look open. Regolith doesn't need water to hold. The "c" is a hair. The OPP comm antenna--not wires. A-naut pushes up with L hand on other a-naut's shoulder. USSR tracked all US launches. So did UK, Aus & FR. Von Braun to Antarctica to study habitations. He was no geologist!
@timrocket2008, Maybe I am stupid, but it's not about me.
Hollywood stage gaffers also label props on THE BOTTOM--not the top! Why does the "c" have a shadow? Hmm. What are the chances the shape of the letter "c" is found somewhere on the surface of the moon with about 19-zillion rocks on it? Pretty good, I'd say! Hell, my 2-year-old nephew can find the shape of a "c" in the clouds!
There is NO record of top rocket scientists collecting 100s of moon rocks. Often claimed--NEVER documented!
@LunarTuner Just Google Von Braun and find that he was their top rocket scientist and in 1967 He went and collected Moon Rocks. In the middle of the Moon Race!And there is no chance the two C's were anything other than a Hollywood Center Stage marking. If it were one C there might be a chance that it was just a hair but two? And the fact that they are perfect center stage markings consistent with Hollywood makes it no chance at all. Proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was all a deception.
@timrocket2008, I'm aware that Von Braun went to the Antarctic for a week, but there is NO record whatsoever that he collected rocks there. This claim is often made, but no one ever answers where this info came from. It's senseless. Why send a rocket propulsion expert to do the work of a geologist? And if he got 100s of lbs. of meteorites in a week, wouldn't the world have 1,000s of lbs. of lunar meteorites by now?
We disagree. The "c" was a hair. I can find "c" shapes anywhere in nature.
@LunarTuner So picking up Moon Rocks from the south pole in the Middle of The Moon Race is the work of a geologist according to you. Your math is a bit off. 1967 is 2 years before 1969. NOT a week s you claim.
Mr. Rocket, Von Braun & his friends were in the Antarctic for 1 week. The record shows that from then on, he was back in the US working on Apollo. Photos are online of him inspecting the Skylab mockup, talking with President LBJ, visiting congressmen, flying weightless in the KC-135, at the pre-launch briefing of Apollo 8 and taking tours of the Marshall Spaceflight Center.
Do you think NASA would leave 1 of their top propulsion scientist at the S. Pole during the program he helped design?
@LunarTuner Before you said there was no record of Von Braun going to the south pole. Now you admitted him going there with "friends" for an entire week. Plenty of time to pick up all the rocks they want. In the Middle of the Moon Race!!
@timrocket2008, NO! Look more carefully. I said there was no record that ROCKS were collected!!!
In '67, Von Braun and colleagues went to Antarctica on a "working vacation" to have some fun and interview scientists there about habitation issues in harsh environments.
YOU are the one who said something about rocks. There is NO RECORD of ROCKS.
A week is enough time to get 100s of lbs. of lunar meteorites from the Antarctic? Then every nation would have 1,000s of lbs. They don't!
@timrocket2008, if Von Braun collected rocks, SOMEONE had to relay that info. WHO? If you can't say, I can only assume it's hearsay or another theory. You think I'm just going to take your word for it?
If someone collected 100s of lbs. of lunar meteorites in 1 week at the South Pole, Such samples would be a HUGE interest to geologists and astronomers around the world. As it is, only 46 lbs. of lunar meteorites exist AT ALL.
@LunarTuner Those meteorites may not even be from the Moon. They could be but the only reason they are called Moon Rocks is because Japan found them to be the same thing NASA gave them.
@timrocket2008, Do you think Japanese geologists can't identify a lunar meteorite? Seriously?
It doesn't matter. The entire story is an unsubstantiated, undocumented invention. There's no more record of Von Braun getting lunar meteorites from Antarctica than there is of him bringing back blue penguin eggs.
@LunarTuner Back then they still had freedom of press and it was reported that they were collecting hundreds of rocks in 1967 in the Middle of the Moon Race! Now that all of that is suppressed, people like you are ignorant to it.
Of course there is no record of them Lying! They are the ones Lying and controlling the Record. Do you understand yet?
@timrocket2008, Dude, I was born in '61. All Just point me to a single authority that can attest to seeing 100s of lbs. of rocks being collected & brought back from Antarctica in '67. I've searched the web. I've searched my own library. NOTHING! You want me to believe a random idea without checking? How do I know YOU aren't the one lying (no offence)
Apollo doubters are always calling Apollo believers shills & lemming who just believe anything told them. That's exactly what I'm trying to avoid
@LunarTuner Quick Google: Landing believers claim that rocks brought back from the Moon prove that the landings took place; ... hoax believers raise concerns about ex-Nazi and NASA's chief rocket scientist Wernher von Braun's trip to Antarctica two years prior to Apollo missions. They contend that no credible explanation for the trip was ever offered, and that he would have been susceptible to pressure to agree to the conspiracy in order to protect himself from recriminations for his Nazi past.
@timrocket2008, your referring me to an article that tells me that hoax believers believe what you believe. So? The fact that some believe what you believe is not record of Von Braun getting lunar meteorites from Antarctica. All it says is that some others have the same unsubstantiated theory your have.
Best way to piss off the US is to beat them at something. So, the US responded and threw massive money at it. USSR continued to astound the world with major strategic space accomplishments like the first dog, first woman or first to smash into the moon. WooHoo! Major engineering accomplishments. The video misrepresents US accomplishments which were usually only a few weeks behind the USSR. In the end, the US Saturn V succeeded and the USSR N1 blew up 4 times in a row. THAT is the story.
Me again. Yeah, in case no cunt has noticed I'm watching these the first time round. Anyone up for starting a blog bringing all this together underground style seeing how YouTube is now owned by the system? meh, fuck it. Good work again my neighbour. Has anyone checked the world grow conspiracy on youtube yet. interesting stuff. vodka and smokes rule
awesome vid what an excellent point the russains were the first for everything but we went to the moon the more i think about it i dont know if we landed there what did we give the russains to keep there silence while we landed on the moon ?
Great video. Since no one is ever going to be going to the Moon it's a bit like disproving deities. How many more plans to go to the Moon is NASA going make, I wonder, only to cancel them. It would be exponentially easier to go today with how much technology has advanced. So many advances (such as microchips) have made space travel much easier. Does NASA even care that they lost all the Moon footage? Do they care that a substantial percentage of the world doubts they ever went?
Logic without facts is a car with no gas. I have given you sources of facts to check out. "It's obvious" that the world is flat, until you start checking scientifically. Don't keep your eyes closed and tell *me* to wake up! Open your own eyes. After you complete watching my first Favorite in my page, go to the websites I listed... you'll be surprised how the doofuses have lied to you about things that can be easily checked and which have long since been debunked.
Badastronomy is a serious astronomy site with a silly name... tinyurlDOTcom/moontruefacts is good, and the info on Wikipedia can be crossreferenced with the real science sites listed at the bottom. The *content* there is not affected by adhoms against the site. If they say something wrong, fix it! If they don't, then the fact that it is Wikipedia saying it, doesn't matter. Try "Apollo third hand evidence" in the search there. What is your source? Rense. com? Some other nutbar site?
Everyone can plainly see that the American Apollo Program was a put up job... everyone that is EXCEPT those who have a vested interest in NOT seeing it.
Everyone too lazy to type "Apollo Hoax" into Wikipedia can pretend the Apollo Program was a put up job, except tho$e who $tand to make lot$ of ca$h from $elling DVD$ and book$ to yokel$. They know it wa$n't really a hoax, $o they avoid Wikipedia, badastronomy. com, and clavius. org for reasons having nothing to do with laziness.
ur 100% right, my man ... check my vids, jarrahs, arcangelmykes ... its hoax of the century along with all the usa israeli false flags to murder millions
Absolutely hilarious. If you hadn't played it so hard, I would honestly have believed you were too stupid to go to the badastronomy site and see the explanation behind all these misinterpretations. Selecting a bunch of dead guys out of the air and calling them involved and suspiciously dead, digitizing the footage blockily and calling the block edges and antenna glint "wires"... ignoring how a 35-lb man can get up on the moon by getting his feet under him... Polar rocks then undiscovered... Hah!
Anyone see the movie "The Matrix"? Imagine two people hardwired into the matrix, convinced that their virtual reality is real. These two people, both fooled into thinking their world is real, spend the whole day arguing "Apollo was real!" "Fake!" "Real!" "Fake!" What if both sides of this debate are wrong? God (or whatever created our "reality") could pull off all kinds of deceptions, and no conspiracy would be required. When you sleep, do you believe that yours dreams are real? Probably.
The first 3 mins 40 seconds is a pretty good summary. The rest is easily-refuted nonsense, and no amount of swearing (every other word, it seems) actually makes true (although it makes it more amusing!).
On behalf of North West England, I apologise for this guy, who has as much grasp of basic physics as Manchester City has of playing football (none).
USSR got pawned by USA, no questions asked and by the way : what is the importance of getting a woman into space? does it help in the space age technology??!! BASICALLY NO!!
The USSR had only three in 1964-67 (each only a little longer than one day) whereas the US had ten (averaging over four days each). In terms of spacecraft hours, the USSR had 460 hours of space flight; the US had 1,024 hours. In terms of astronaut/cosmonaut time, the USSR had accumulated 534 hours of manned spaceflight whereas the US had accumulated 1,992 hours
Who says they're lost? Some dorky webpage? For I'm fairly certain a number of them are on display at the National Air and Space Museum. Why dont you go find out before jumping to a dumb conclusion.
1) Rocks with wind erosion, water erosion, oxidation, and several other dead give-aways that they didnt come from an airless moon that wouldnt fool any geologist over the age of 4.
2) Urban legend you cut and pasted and were dumb enough to never check. They're online right now if you google
3) "Texas?" WFT are you talking about?
4) We're going to believe the "TV" before we believe illiterate conspiracy dorks who pretend reading dufus webpages makes them clever.
BTW, since you're the hoax nerd who begged for attention with pathetically refutable conspiracy tripe, can YOU point out the guy who needs a "live" in this picture?
I'm 2:45 into it and still waiting for any factual basis. The innuendo and obvious bias is spread far and wide, but there's precious little substance and far too much juvenile language.
Naw he just gives you it no bullshit BERNARD . See thats the way real people over here talk to each other on the street , no bullshit . See us UK ppl are socially superior to you yanks . Thats why we gave you socialism . You obviously just take offense because he's havin a go at the USA.But think of it this way - it aint even your land n theres no such thing as a 100% blooded American , unless he sleeps ina wigwam n smokes te peace-pipe . Fuck off u mongrel - you talk pish !!
Great video. Though I must point out with respect that it was actually the Germans who were the first to launch anything into space, not the Russians. The Russians were the next, and then the first man, also Russian. Not many people know about the German thing.
All arguments used here were explained many times already on hundreds of independent websites.
You may believe what you want dude, and think what you want about politics or masons. We know politics is dirty (even UK's politics), but that does not change the fact American Astronauts landed six times and walked on the Moon between 1969 and 1972.
Your video does not provide a shred of solid evidence. It's all GARBAGE.
Whatever you think about politics, esp. today's politics or 9/11, n2, it DOES NOT change the fact 12 Apollo astronauts walked on the Moon between 1969 and 1972.
Just like HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of good, hard working people from Apollo program, they didn't have anything to do with 9/11, esp. 30 years before it happened.
It takes real half-wit to mix these subjects.
This garbage and other videos posted by lunatic hoax believers offer NO PROOF for that stupid pseudo-scientific hoax theory.
a 'conspiracy theory' or 'alternative theory' can only exist, by default, because there is doubt in the original theory, or rather, the original theory cannot be proved empirically
as neither theory (the original one and conspiracy one) cannot be proved or disproved irrefutably either way, they are just as equal and just as plausible, therefore, if one has to label one a conspiracy theory one must also label the other one a conspiracy theory aswell
I wouldn't call myself CT. The evidence and thousands of people who worked close to Apollo program still alive today carries by far more weight than arguments used by Lunar conspiracy theorists.
When approached with necessary understanding of physics, Moon's environment and photography, actually Apollo footage is all evidence a person needs to be convinced that Apollo missions were real.
You're right about one thing for sure: any important event will always bring conspiracy theories.
Thanks for kind and cilized reply. I really appreciate it.
In most cases what I and other people who disagree with Lunar conspiracy theory hear is extremely offensive language. Some of those poor, troubled minds can't even leave my Mother alone...
I'm not trying to convince you about anything n2. You're not even worth a few keystrokes.
I do that for all the people who visit YT and watch videos like this one, so they have a chance to compare it to valid, scientific and historical explanations.
although i found the motherly comments funny, i would agree its not the best way of solving a debate, on saying that though, neither is claiming the word of 'thousands of apollo workers' adds weight to an argument, it doesnt at all, one man saying so, or a thousand man saying so, it doesnt matter, the irrefutable proof would still be missing.
any important event which has gaps of doubt, or any event which cannot be proved empirically and irrefutably is going to spark up alternative theorys, its just, either through blind loyalty or complete naiviety, some choose to label them alternative theroys as conspiracy theroys without realising there both equal theorys
Well, for me Apollo footage is all I need to be sure Apollo missions were real.
It's not only about selected fragments that Lunar conspiracy theorists abuse, it's about tens of hours of footage and long continuous scenes.
Even with today's green screens and CGI it would be near impossible to fake all that. Even Hollywood or Chinese (with their flying kung-fu masters) don't shoot such a long scenes.
Faking all that 40 years ago was impossible altogether!
n2 "expert", go and watch The Odyssey again and then let us know if you can see such a long, UNINTERRUPTED scenes there as in Apollo footage.
If such UNINTERRUPTED scenes exist in The Odyssey movie, show me the astronauts walking and working on the surface of the Moon in half an hour non-stop takes, no cuts.
Show me how they faked lunar rover and dust around its wheels, how they faked soft pieces of foil thrown and hitting the ground like it's only possible in 1/6g and vacuum.
Listen n2, obviously you don't know what you're talking about here.
Have you seen all material from Apollo 15: Man Must Explore DVDs for example?
Go and rent it. It's more than 20 (!) hours of footage you can enjoy on those DVDs. When you're done, I suggest then you come back here. Of course, it's only suggestion. What can I say when you "KNOW THE TRUTH"...
n2, you're wrong again and you only show again that manipulation is what you do the best. I don't have ego problem and I don't think I'm so important as you claim.
I provide facts, you provide bad science, manipulation and offensive language that you call "funny". Poor thing, you probably don't know what good sense of humor is.
All your arguments have been already explained as bad science or wrong interpretations hundreds of times by scientists and independent websites all over the world.
I said you're not worth a few keystrokes and now I repeat it because you deserve it.
You throw bad language at me for no reason, including offending my Mother, and now you're back with your preaching?
Look who's talking...
You better hit the books, watch Apollo series on DVDs and learn the facts. Science and learning takes time, it takes effort, unlike Lunatic conspiracy theory which is easy, no effort required, and it melts like ice cream in your brain...
"This from someone that post a half wit video that says pisspoor, fucking, fuck, bullshit,dick ect. And then comments on the thread with pure uneducated responses. I though English came from England. Then why can't you speak it or spell it? Bloody Wanker.
I came her to give the Moon Sheep hell, but you don't give me a leg to stand on. All this crap has been debunked B4"
If you're goning to call me a wanker, at least leave the comments up as a) i get emails explaining what you said, b) it makes you look more of a muppet if you delete them, and of course, most importantly c) as if i would give a fuck anyway
i don't support violence, but if a little violence and readiness keeps our empire on top, then the violence will be forever justified. its about doing whatever it takes to stay on top, cos if your not on top, your under someone else.
now obviously the fairest way of solving things would be for each leader to have a bareknuckle fight n winner takes all, but am afraid things dont work like that, n kids walk about with nuclear bombs in their pockets now
How is it that we managed to fly aaaaaalllllll the way to the moon, land on its surface, fuck around for a while and then fly aaaaaaaalllllll the way back without so much as a slight computer error, bumpy landing or anything. First time we went to the moon, we had no real idea what was in store but we managed a flawless trip, landing, visit and return. Fuck me, they were good in those days. Or maybe, just maybe--- ITS ALL BULLSHIT
During the bit where the space man gets pulled up by the wire, you can see the dirt falling quickly as if there is no "moon gravity". And that bit of vid looks as if it were slowed down. Hey that could most definitely add to the moon-walking effect if done correctly! Too bad Nasa sucks with getting rid of their screwy cuts w/ wires and all.
OrgoneHawker 1 month ago
@OrgoneHawker My near conclusion has been that Nasa has indeed gone to the moon, but their publicly released footage may have been a contingency plan, and probably there to distract from any extra plans they had for their space exploration at that time.
OrgoneHawker 1 month ago
Excellent. Hilarious depiction of an obvious hoax!
amandlathree 2 months ago
funniest thing ive seen in a while, the moon landings that is, the vt is good as well lol
JP05CPSN 4 months ago in playlist Laughing at Apollo
Funny as shit !!!
straydog02 5 months ago
You are a fucking poet.
Who do I hafta blow to pull jury duty in your courtroom?
It ain't what I'd call justice- but I'm a "right, proper" truth lover and enough of a pufta to wanna hear the facts in a way that don't make me cry.
Quick question- if I'm married to a lawyer, how do I get my bit of prosecuting muff to sue my Municipal Water Board for fluoridating my water?
Fidelity, foot rubs, and cunnilingus ain't "chops" enough.
You, sir, are a light in a steaming pile of darkness.
AssumptionTruncheon 6 months ago
I love this guy! Awesome video man and I'm an American so think were all pricks with no sense of humor.
Danthorn76 6 months ago
Can you please sound a little more serious please? Im really interested in why our country did this and your bullshit video is making it sound stupid.
dezzick398 8 months ago
@dezzick398 No I fucking won't sound a little more serious pal, its not my place to make sure your interests are ful-filled, fuck off
iloveponteporn 8 months ago 2
@iloveponteporn Actually yes it is bitch and get off your fucking knees cause you suck. DUMB BITCH
dezzick398 8 months ago
@iloveponteporn I found this video to be presented in an excellent format to tap into today's minds. And it's fuckin' hilarious.
OrgoneHawker 1 month ago
@dezzick398 That's because its stupid what our country has done..nothing but cheaters and thieves/
vitaminkid201 1 month ago
mate great video. I want to believe you i RLY RLY do! but what do you say for the fact that russia never mentioned a thing about usa not getting there? i mean they were up in arms back then!
LeftosDoussis 8 months ago
Comment removed
CosmicTwillight 9 months ago
..and yeah u forget to mention that NASA says there are no objects on the far side of the moon ; )
CosmicTwillight 9 months ago
Best Conspiracy video ever ...fock yeah mate you did a very good job ; ) ...there are so many evidences today evryone with half an brain knows that there is a lot of shit going on with nasa photos !....i did a lot of research about those things because im not such a idiot who believes evrything and trusts evryone but there are some really really strange things i found maybe i will make a homepage about it !! ...but seriously this guy knows what he is talking about !
CosmicTwillight 9 months ago
Everyone brings up mythbusters proved was prove a couple of theories and maybe they are both pretty smart but if they were faked they were done Stanley Kubrick and that guy knew how to make films he could've done it easily also NASA gave him a special lens for 2001 worth a fortune,
seaniekay 10 months ago
Not seeing any of the "wires" you are pointing out
iamgdawghearmeroar 10 months ago
Saying "fuck" every other word sure gives us confidence in your intellectual maturity.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
I'd like someone to count how many times he says fuck in this video
Ushanka15 10 months ago
This guy sounds like such a faggot. I hope you choke to death on your boyfriends cum.
stuntmanmike37 1 year ago
@iloveponteporn science disproved your video, and only whacked out conspiracy theorist believe it. I'm just here to hate on dummies that can't use google.
4real4real217 1 year ago
@0185funkmaster: the light from the sun(1) that light, reflected on the moon(2), light reflected from earth(3) your a fucking idiot. Go google you some learning about the moon. BTW, you the placed special mirrors on the moon to reflect lasers to measure the EXACT distance. Go watch Mythbusters, those guise couldn't fake a moon landing with modern equipment.
4real4real217 1 year ago
@0815funkmaster
4real4real217 1 year ago
and by the way, those "wires" are reflections from sunlight. Hence why the "wires" arent lines, but ovals.
I'm not gonna stick around and argue, because you clearly are wrong, but I would recommend reading a book called "Bad Astronomy" which examines the "moon hoax" for a chapter. It's full of great information from a third party on the actual physics and analysis of a few photographs.
Crawford429 1 year ago
You DO realize that the US ran TEN entire missions between Apollo 1 and Apollo 11, right? Maybe NASA figured out how to actually fly around...
And honestly, if you don't believe man landed on the moon, buy a huge telescope and find the lunar module. Its still on the moon were they left it.
Crawford429 1 year ago
@Crawford429 The one who need the huge telescope is Nasa, not us. So, the book called "Bad Astronomy" is written by phil plait? Where did I heard the name..Hmm.
watch?v=QxzQXxo6JlM
XHRC 1 year ago
MYTHBUSTERS BITCH.
It's an American(superiortoBritan) show that disproved all that you've said.
4real4real217 1 year ago
@4real4real217 wow, a carefully worded documentary offered biased alternative theories and beamed them out across the media networks for all to see. Of course their correct, you typed in UPPERCASE (far superior to lower case) and everyone knows you can never dispute something written in capitols..... its the law.
iloveponteporn 1 year ago
@4real4real217
"MYTHBUSTERS BITCH."
Watch this video...
/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00
...and this series...
/watch?v=r5ajIVmGiQE
Cosmored 5 months ago
As for the video.
Fabric still shakes with no atmosphere. THERE IS NO VIDEO OF A FLAG SHAKING THAT ISN'T BEING PHYSICALLY MANIPULATED.
Ever hear of LENS FLARE, with three light sources, reflective visors to protect the eyes of astronauts from UNFILTERED FUCKING SOLAR RAYS, lens flare is COMMON in space.
Oh and since there's one SIXTH earths gravity, they weigh about 30 pounds plus 10 for the suits.
You do know we put special mirrors in EXACT spots so we can beam lasers up and get the exact
4real4real217 1 year ago
Oh MY GOD.
Lunar dust isn't sand you fucking TWIT.
it's jagged, that AND THE FACT THAT THERE IS ONE SIXTH(1/6) the earths gravity. Makes foot prints more visible. The BROUGHT BACK LUNAR DUST!!! that shit doesn't fall to earth. Use GOOGLE YOU FUCKING RETARD.
4real4real217 1 year ago
There are THREE sources of light on the moon you fucking wanker:
The SUN.
The light refracted from the EARTH.
And... THE FUCKING MOON ITSELF.
Ever wonder why the moon reflects back light? It's science retard.
The astronaut isn't darken because the MOON reflects around eight percent of light that hits it.
4real4real217 1 year ago
@4real4real217 so you are saying the Moon is reflecting light to ITSELF....what are you smoking?!!!!
0815funkmaster 1 year ago
Brilliant, havn't laughed so much in ages. Luv the woman in space and the comment NASAchops. Straight to the point pontporn.
576924 1 year ago
that was funny.....but you missed one, when you started on the moonrocks...did you know that a moon rock that was given to the Netherlands by US was recently tested and it was Petrified wood...ha ha...looks as if VonBoner got some Wood in Antarctica by mistake.
TheDrac3000 1 year ago
you can see evidence from telescopes
yourmajezty 1 year ago
@yourmajezty The most powerful telescope in the World orbiting the Earth can't see any evidence of NASA landing on the Moon. But you can see some with your cheap telescope from you backyard?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Lunar rocks and meteorites are almost completely different. Funny video though.
worldwidedownload 1 year ago
@worldwidedownload No they are the same. Thats why they are called Moon rocks in the South Pole idiot.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Don't you think a moon rock that has been burnt up through entering the earths atmosphere would even be slightly different than one taken off the moons surface? Go back to school.
worldwidedownload 1 year ago
@worldwidedownload Well how come they are not different then?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
I counted 97 F-bombs in this vid.
I lost count of the "err's" because I feel asleep the 2nd time listening.
I never heard a "T" in the entire video.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
In Hollywood they always mark the Center of the stage with a letter C on a stage prop and on the floor.
What are the chances that two letter C on the floor and the rock are hairs both perfectly shaped as the letter C?
Why the hell did NASA's Top Rocket Scientist, in the Middle of the Moon Race, go to collect hundreds of pounds of Moon Rocks? He was caught by Journalists in 1967. In the middle of the Moon Race!
They are only called Moon rocks because they are the same meteorites found in Antarcti
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Nonsense. A-naut work is dangerous. 27 of 400,000 people. Suspicious? All blueprints NOT lost. Important docs still exist. Why save blueprints for obsolete bolt or switch? 2 lights? Where's the 2nd shadow? Flag DESIGNED to look open. Regolith doesn't need water to hold. The "c" is a hair. The OPP comm antenna--not wires. A-naut pushes up with L hand on other a-naut's shoulder. USSR tracked all US launches. So did UK, Aus & FR. Von Braun to Antarctica to study habitations. He was no geologist!
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner You are stupid.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, Maybe I am stupid, but it's not about me.
Hollywood stage gaffers also label props on THE BOTTOM--not the top! Why does the "c" have a shadow? Hmm. What are the chances the shape of the letter "c" is found somewhere on the surface of the moon with about 19-zillion rocks on it? Pretty good, I'd say! Hell, my 2-year-old nephew can find the shape of a "c" in the clouds!
There is NO record of top rocket scientists collecting 100s of moon rocks. Often claimed--NEVER documented!
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Just Google Von Braun and find that he was their top rocket scientist and in 1967 He went and collected Moon Rocks. In the middle of the Moon Race!And there is no chance the two C's were anything other than a Hollywood Center Stage marking. If it were one C there might be a chance that it was just a hair but two? And the fact that they are perfect center stage markings consistent with Hollywood makes it no chance at all. Proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was all a deception.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, I'm aware that Von Braun went to the Antarctic for a week, but there is NO record whatsoever that he collected rocks there. This claim is often made, but no one ever answers where this info came from. It's senseless. Why send a rocket propulsion expert to do the work of a geologist? And if he got 100s of lbs. of meteorites in a week, wouldn't the world have 1,000s of lbs. of lunar meteorites by now?
We disagree. The "c" was a hair. I can find "c" shapes anywhere in nature.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner So picking up Moon Rocks from the south pole in the Middle of The Moon Race is the work of a geologist according to you. Your math is a bit off. 1967 is 2 years before 1969. NOT a week s you claim.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Mr. Rocket, Von Braun & his friends were in the Antarctic for 1 week. The record shows that from then on, he was back in the US working on Apollo. Photos are online of him inspecting the Skylab mockup, talking with President LBJ, visiting congressmen, flying weightless in the KC-135, at the pre-launch briefing of Apollo 8 and taking tours of the Marshall Spaceflight Center.
Do you think NASA would leave 1 of their top propulsion scientist at the S. Pole during the program he helped design?
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Before you said there was no record of Von Braun going to the south pole. Now you admitted him going there with "friends" for an entire week. Plenty of time to pick up all the rocks they want. In the Middle of the Moon Race!!
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, NO! Look more carefully. I said there was no record that ROCKS were collected!!!
In '67, Von Braun and colleagues went to Antarctica on a "working vacation" to have some fun and interview scientists there about habitation issues in harsh environments.
YOU are the one who said something about rocks. There is NO RECORD of ROCKS.
A week is enough time to get 100s of lbs. of lunar meteorites from the Antarctic? Then every nation would have 1,000s of lbs. They don't!
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Of course they are not going to put it on Record That he was there to collect Moon Rocks! Thats a stupid argument.
You think if they faked it and lied they would put it on Record? I laugh at your arguments.They make no sense whatsoever.
Why would every nation go to the south pole to collect 1000 of lbs of rocks?
However Japan collected some and discovered they are the same thing NASA gave them. Thats the only reason they are even called Moon Rocks.
No proof it was not faked.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, if Von Braun collected rocks, SOMEONE had to relay that info. WHO? If you can't say, I can only assume it's hearsay or another theory. You think I'm just going to take your word for it?
If someone collected 100s of lbs. of lunar meteorites in 1 week at the South Pole, Such samples would be a HUGE interest to geologists and astronomers around the world. As it is, only 46 lbs. of lunar meteorites exist AT ALL.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Those meteorites may not even be from the Moon. They could be but the only reason they are called Moon Rocks is because Japan found them to be the same thing NASA gave them.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, Do you think Japanese geologists can't identify a lunar meteorite? Seriously?
It doesn't matter. The entire story is an unsubstantiated, undocumented invention. There's no more record of Von Braun getting lunar meteorites from Antarctica than there is of him bringing back blue penguin eggs.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Back then they still had freedom of press and it was reported that they were collecting hundreds of rocks in 1967 in the Middle of the Moon Race! Now that all of that is suppressed, people like you are ignorant to it.
Of course there is no record of them Lying! They are the ones Lying and controlling the Record. Do you understand yet?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008, Dude, I was born in '61. All Just point me to a single authority that can attest to seeing 100s of lbs. of rocks being collected & brought back from Antarctica in '67. I've searched the web. I've searched my own library. NOTHING! You want me to believe a random idea without checking? How do I know YOU aren't the one lying (no offence)
Apollo doubters are always calling Apollo believers shills & lemming who just believe anything told them. That's exactly what I'm trying to avoid
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Quick Google: Landing believers claim that rocks brought back from the Moon prove that the landings took place; ... hoax believers raise concerns about ex-Nazi and NASA's chief rocket scientist Wernher von Braun's trip to Antarctica two years prior to Apollo missions. They contend that no credible explanation for the trip was ever offered, and that he would have been susceptible to pressure to agree to the conspiracy in order to protect himself from recriminations for his Nazi past.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timrocket2008, your referring me to an article that tells me that hoax believers believe what you believe. So? The fact that some believe what you believe is not record of Von Braun getting lunar meteorites from Antarctica. All it says is that some others have the same unsubstantiated theory your have.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
Best way to piss off the US is to beat them at something. So, the US responded and threw massive money at it. USSR continued to astound the world with major strategic space accomplishments like the first dog, first woman or first to smash into the moon. WooHoo! Major engineering accomplishments. The video misrepresents US accomplishments which were usually only a few weeks behind the USSR. In the end, the US Saturn V succeeded and the USSR N1 blew up 4 times in a row. THAT is the story.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
it may be true, but it seems to me that the vid at 7.55 is rewinded, possible?
DarkTrance08 1 year ago
Not only is this very funny, it's all true! A magic combination that's pretty rare in my book. Excellent video.
allrare 1 year ago
Me again. Yeah, in case no cunt has noticed I'm watching these the first time round. Anyone up for starting a blog bringing all this together underground style seeing how YouTube is now owned by the system? meh, fuck it. Good work again my neighbour. Has anyone checked the world grow conspiracy on youtube yet. interesting stuff. vodka and smokes rule
TheHighlanderEst84 1 year ago
Great vid!
bweazel 1 year ago
awesome vid what an excellent point the russains were the first for everything but we went to the moon the more i think about it i dont know if we landed there what did we give the russains to keep there silence while we landed on the moon ?
GONECRUISING72 1 year ago
Great video. Since no one is ever going to be going to the Moon it's a bit like disproving deities. How many more plans to go to the Moon is NASA going make, I wonder, only to cancel them. It would be exponentially easier to go today with how much technology has advanced. So many advances (such as microchips) have made space travel much easier. Does NASA even care that they lost all the Moon footage? Do they care that a substantial percentage of the world doubts they ever went?
Justwannalogon 1 year ago
Nasa = US NWO Govt could not care less
nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nasa = US NWO Govt could not care less
nasafakedit 1 year ago
lol.. .this is why the world hates poms you fuck witt ..winging fucking poms.
alienhunter36 1 year ago
Eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm , eehm
MarcoLucien 1 year ago
well said
Vincenteloco 1 year ago
I just gave you a standing ovation. Excellent.
nrobnas43 1 year ago 5
Ponteporn is a Legend!!
hotladies2010 1 year ago
hm Lawl
MonoMask1 2 years ago
You are right ,I apologise shouldn'have written that .I am an asshole sometimes.Sorry.
bliksemsekakding 2 years ago
idiotic analysis Grow up buttwipe Get your facts right.
bliksemsekakding 2 years ago
You tell me to 'grow up' but in the same breath call me a 'buttwipe' ? Hmmmmm... Irony?
iloveponteporn 2 years ago 9
@iloveponteporn i live in the u.s. northern california, excellent video, excellent i love it & will show anybody i can !!!!
area51r 1 year ago
@bliksemsekakding Were are the fact not right
npf2135 1 year ago
No, my source is logic and basic observation as applied to the Apollo Program.
Wake up. It's obvious.
shawnfella 2 years ago
Logic without facts is a car with no gas. I have given you sources of facts to check out. "It's obvious" that the world is flat, until you start checking scientifically. Don't keep your eyes closed and tell *me* to wake up! Open your own eyes. After you complete watching my first Favorite in my page, go to the websites I listed... you'll be surprised how the doofuses have lied to you about things that can be easily checked and which have long since been debunked.
Pygar2 2 years ago
Dude... wikipedia? Bad astronomy? These are your sources?
Nuff said.
shawnfella 2 years ago
Badastronomy is a serious astronomy site with a silly name... tinyurlDOTcom/moontruefacts is good, and the info on Wikipedia can be crossreferenced with the real science sites listed at the bottom. The *content* there is not affected by adhoms against the site. If they say something wrong, fix it! If they don't, then the fact that it is Wikipedia saying it, doesn't matter. Try "Apollo third hand evidence" in the search there. What is your source? Rense. com? Some other nutbar site?
Pygar2 2 years ago
Everyone can plainly see that the American Apollo Program was a put up job... everyone that is EXCEPT those who have a vested interest in NOT seeing it.
shawnfella 2 years ago
Everyone too lazy to type "Apollo Hoax" into Wikipedia can pretend the Apollo Program was a put up job, except tho$e who $tand to make lot$ of ca$h from $elling DVD$ and book$ to yokel$. They know it wa$n't really a hoax, $o they avoid Wikipedia, badastronomy. com, and clavius. org for reasons having nothing to do with laziness.
Pygar2 2 years ago
ur 100% right, my man ... check my vids, jarrahs, arcangelmykes ... its hoax of the century along with all the usa israeli false flags to murder millions
pt1gard 2 years ago
Absolutely hilarious. If you hadn't played it so hard, I would honestly have believed you were too stupid to go to the badastronomy site and see the explanation behind all these misinterpretations. Selecting a bunch of dead guys out of the air and calling them involved and suspiciously dead, digitizing the footage blockily and calling the block edges and antenna glint "wires"... ignoring how a 35-lb man can get up on the moon by getting his feet under him... Polar rocks then undiscovered... Hah!
Pygar2 2 years ago
Your fucking spot on mate! *****
lowryder2able 2 years ago
darn. already found one typo, "yours dreams" should be "your dreams". hey, it's 2:40 a.m...
noncertainty 2 years ago
Anyone see the movie "The Matrix"? Imagine two people hardwired into the matrix, convinced that their virtual reality is real. These two people, both fooled into thinking their world is real, spend the whole day arguing "Apollo was real!" "Fake!" "Real!" "Fake!" What if both sides of this debate are wrong? God (or whatever created our "reality") could pull off all kinds of deceptions, and no conspiracy would be required. When you sleep, do you believe that yours dreams are real? Probably.
noncertainty 2 years ago
That's a very good video! Very well done indeed! Of course, the theories in it are crap....
But very well done video nonetheless!
breeknow 2 years ago
at 1:55 what does he say?
how many mouse?
911Eminem911 2 years ago
forty mice
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
The first 3 mins 40 seconds is a pretty good summary. The rest is easily-refuted nonsense, and no amount of swearing (every other word, it seems) actually makes true (although it makes it more amusing!).
On behalf of North West England, I apologise for this guy, who has as much grasp of basic physics as Manchester City has of playing football (none).
This is bobbins.
OasisShmoasis 2 years ago 2
Best informative video EVER!
5 Stars.
LOL
gcmarcal 2 years ago
USSR got pawned by USA, no questions asked and by the way : what is the importance of getting a woman into space? does it help in the space age technology??!! BASICALLY NO!!
chris36482 2 years ago
The USSR had only three in 1964-67 (each only a little longer than one day) whereas the US had ten (averaging over four days each). In terms of spacecraft hours, the USSR had 460 hours of space flight; the US had 1,024 hours. In terms of astronaut/cosmonaut time, the USSR had accumulated 534 hours of manned spaceflight whereas the US had accumulated 1,992 hours
chris36482 2 years ago 2
hahahahaha helarious !!!
ASTRO-NOTS
commodore64738 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"The newspapers say we went there???"
Are you TRYING to sound retarded? Sorry, but at 4:02 I'm shutting this off.
The best evidence would be
1) the moonrocks
2) the miles of technical documents
3) the OTHER countries that tracked our capsule
4) the 12 witnesses who can say "yes I was there," and have been saying so for 40 years
and oh yeah, the Russians say we went. ;)
So immature argument, lousy sound, and scientific illiteracy. Congrats, perfect 1/5 stars. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
Where are the original space suits ??
commodore64738 2 years ago
Who says they're lost? Some dorky webpage? For I'm fairly certain a number of them are on display at the National Air and Space Museum. Why dont you go find out before jumping to a dumb conclusion.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago 2
@SpreadingtheMuse
Dream on Muse.....
1) Moonrocks can be found tonwise in the arctic
2) Blieprints of the lander 'disapeared' NASA lost them !! ;-)
3) Yeah country of texas, washington and florida $
4) liars, NASA nutters, don't belive all the shit on TV pal.
%9 the russians ? who, all of them LOL
Get a live man !!!
commodore64738 2 years ago
1) Rocks with wind erosion, water erosion, oxidation, and several other dead give-aways that they didnt come from an airless moon that wouldnt fool any geologist over the age of 4.
2) Urban legend you cut and pasted and were dumb enough to never check. They're online right now if you google
3) "Texas?" WFT are you talking about?
4) We're going to believe the "TV" before we believe illiterate conspiracy dorks who pretend reading dufus webpages makes them clever.
Just saying. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
BTW, since you're the hoax nerd who begged for attention with pathetically refutable conspiracy tripe, can YOU point out the guy who needs a "live" in this picture?
I think you meant "L I F E." So epic fail. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
I'm 2:45 into it and still waiting for any factual basis. The innuendo and obvious bias is spread far and wide, but there's precious little substance and far too much juvenile language.
And you couldnt use an actual microphone?
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
To the moon ? It's getting boring now. Do you belive in Roland McDonald ? Looks like it. Do what you're good at, taking care of your dad's cum.
commodore64738 2 years ago
I'm going to believe the engineers and physicists who say we went before I believe an illiterate youtard yutz, yes. ;)
You see, there are people who create and accomplish and achieve, and we all be eternally grateful that you'll never be one of them. ;)
Sorry Charlie.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
Naw he just gives you it no bullshit BERNARD . See thats the way real people over here talk to each other on the street , no bullshit . See us UK ppl are socially superior to you yanks . Thats why we gave you socialism . You obviously just take offense because he's havin a go at the USA.But think of it this way - it aint even your land n theres no such thing as a 100% blooded American , unless he sleeps ina wigwam n smokes te peace-pipe . Fuck off u mongrel - you talk pish !!
RoggenWolfe 2 years ago
I take offense at scientifically illiterate dufuses who pretend that cut and pasting ridiculed hoax propaganda from a dork webpage makes them clever.
If you're going to defend such ignorance, I guess we've found your "social superiority." ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
yeah but you cant argue with what he's sayin....well...funknuts like you always will . Beyond help , even though you dont believe it . Jog on Berny !
RoggenWolfe 2 years ago
I can argue with ANYTHING he says. He's just mistaken when he thinks that "ten out of ten idiots agree" equals proof.
If you think the same nonsense, then that explains a lot. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago 2
Justice MUST be brought to this atrocious, anti-science video. I will one-star it.
Actually, I won't. This video must be seen by school childern so they can see how sick, twisted, and STUPID Moon hoaxers are.
TremorHellborn 2 years ago
The Stranger: There's just one thing, Dude.
The Dude: And what's that?
The Stranger: Do you have to use so many cuss words?
The Dude: What the fuck you talking about?
The Stranger: Okay, Dude. Have it your way.
CarrieRulesTheBlock 2 years ago 2
haha
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
REALLY EXCELLENT
EGMAG 2 years ago 2
@iloveponteporn That vid was F~~~~~~~king ace. Watch out for any FBI agents that come a Knocking at your door LOL.
simposayerman 1 year ago
This is great!!!!! So funny!
janetd58 2 years ago 8
Great video. Though I must point out with respect that it was actually the Germans who were the first to launch anything into space, not the Russians. The Russians were the next, and then the first man, also Russian. Not many people know about the German thing.
JaalaJ 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We went to the moon you buffoon.
That's not all you have to explain.
n2theblue 2 years ago
To the moon ? Do what you're good at taking care of your dad's cum.
commodore64738 2 years ago
Oh Please! We have "moon rocks". We have been to the moon. Some important information for the US side was omitted.
mrbaird 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
This video is all pseudo-scientific manipulation.
All arguments used here were explained many times already on hundreds of independent websites.
You may believe what you want dude, and think what you want about politics or masons. We know politics is dirty (even UK's politics), but that does not change the fact American Astronauts landed six times and walked on the Moon between 1969 and 1972.
Your video does not provide a shred of solid evidence. It's all GARBAGE.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Please, there six successful Moon landings and twelve Moon walkers.
TheEntropyEpoch 2 years ago
People landed 6 times on the Moon:
Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
n2theblue, go and get basic education on the subject.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Whatever you think about politics, esp. today's politics or 9/11, n2, it DOES NOT change the fact 12 Apollo astronauts walked on the Moon between 1969 and 1972.
Just like HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of good, hard working people from Apollo program, they didn't have anything to do with 9/11, esp. 30 years before it happened.
It takes real half-wit to mix these subjects.
This garbage and other videos posted by lunatic hoax believers offer NO PROOF for that stupid pseudo-scientific hoax theory.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
a 'conspiracy theory' or 'alternative theory' can only exist, by default, because there is doubt in the original theory, or rather, the original theory cannot be proved empirically
as neither theory (the original one and conspiracy one) cannot be proved or disproved irrefutably either way, they are just as equal and just as plausible, therefore, if one has to label one a conspiracy theory one must also label the other one a conspiracy theory aswell
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
actually thinking about it, that makes you a 'CT' aswell haha
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
I wouldn't call myself CT. The evidence and thousands of people who worked close to Apollo program still alive today carries by far more weight than arguments used by Lunar conspiracy theorists.
When approached with necessary understanding of physics, Moon's environment and photography, actually Apollo footage is all evidence a person needs to be convinced that Apollo missions were real.
You're right about one thing for sure: any important event will always bring conspiracy theories.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
iloveponte, just want to add one more thing.
Thanks for kind and cilized reply. I really appreciate it.
In most cases what I and other people who disagree with Lunar conspiracy theory hear is extremely offensive language. Some of those poor, troubled minds can't even leave my Mother alone...
You can find examples in this thread.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
I'm not trying to convince you about anything n2. You're not even worth a few keystrokes.
I do that for all the people who visit YT and watch videos like this one, so they have a chance to compare it to valid, scientific and historical explanations.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
although i found the motherly comments funny, i would agree its not the best way of solving a debate, on saying that though, neither is claiming the word of 'thousands of apollo workers' adds weight to an argument, it doesnt at all, one man saying so, or a thousand man saying so, it doesnt matter, the irrefutable proof would still be missing.
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
any important event which has gaps of doubt, or any event which cannot be proved empirically and irrefutably is going to spark up alternative theorys, its just, either through blind loyalty or complete naiviety, some choose to label them alternative theroys as conspiracy theroys without realising there both equal theorys
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Well, for me Apollo footage is all I need to be sure Apollo missions were real.
It's not only about selected fragments that Lunar conspiracy theorists abuse, it's about tens of hours of footage and long continuous scenes.
Even with today's green screens and CGI it would be near impossible to fake all that. Even Hollywood or Chinese (with their flying kung-fu masters) don't shoot such a long scenes.
Faking all that 40 years ago was impossible altogether!
Images speak louder than words.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
n2 "expert", go and watch The Odyssey again and then let us know if you can see such a long, UNINTERRUPTED scenes there as in Apollo footage.
If such UNINTERRUPTED scenes exist in The Odyssey movie, show me the astronauts walking and working on the surface of the Moon in half an hour non-stop takes, no cuts.
Show me how they faked lunar rover and dust around its wheels, how they faked soft pieces of foil thrown and hitting the ground like it's only possible in 1/6g and vacuum.
You can't.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Listen n2, obviously you don't know what you're talking about here.
Have you seen all material from Apollo 15: Man Must Explore DVDs for example?
Go and rent it. It's more than 20 (!) hours of footage you can enjoy on those DVDs. When you're done, I suggest then you come back here. Of course, it's only suggestion. What can I say when you "KNOW THE TRUTH"...
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
n2, you're wrong again and you only show again that manipulation is what you do the best. I don't have ego problem and I don't think I'm so important as you claim.
I provide facts, you provide bad science, manipulation and offensive language that you call "funny". Poor thing, you probably don't know what good sense of humor is.
All your arguments have been already explained as bad science or wrong interpretations hundreds of times by scientists and independent websites all over the world.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
I said you're not worth a few keystrokes and now I repeat it because you deserve it.
You throw bad language at me for no reason, including offending my Mother, and now you're back with your preaching?
Look who's talking...
You better hit the books, watch Apollo series on DVDs and learn the facts. Science and learning takes time, it takes effort, unlike Lunatic conspiracy theory which is easy, no effort required, and it melts like ice cream in your brain...
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
n2theblue says
"This from someone that post a half wit video that says pisspoor, fucking, fuck, bullshit,dick ect. And then comments on the thread with pure uneducated responses. I though English came from England. Then why can't you speak it or spell it? Bloody Wanker.
I came her to give the Moon Sheep hell, but you don't give me a leg to stand on. All this crap has been debunked B4"
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
If you're goning to call me a wanker, at least leave the comments up as a) i get emails explaining what you said, b) it makes you look more of a muppet if you delete them, and of course, most importantly c) as if i would give a fuck anyway
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We went to the moon you buffoon.
That's not all you have to explain.
n2theblue 2 years ago
Comment removed
n2theblue 2 years ago
i don't support violence, but if a little violence and readiness keeps our empire on top, then the violence will be forever justified. its about doing whatever it takes to stay on top, cos if your not on top, your under someone else.
now obviously the fairest way of solving things would be for each leader to have a bareknuckle fight n winner takes all, but am afraid things dont work like that, n kids walk about with nuclear bombs in their pockets now
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
i do, i just don't obviously have the dilemmas of running an empire!
iloveponteporn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How is it that we managed to fly aaaaaalllllll the way to the moon, land on its surface, fuck around for a while and then fly aaaaaaaalllllll the way back without so much as a slight computer error, bumpy landing or anything. First time we went to the moon, we had no real idea what was in store but we managed a flawless trip, landing, visit and return. Fuck me, they were good in those days. Or maybe, just maybe--- ITS ALL BULLSHIT
Greggybread 2 years ago 2
this is it though my friend, how long do you think you n your empire would last if you didnt have the ruthless streak?
iloveponteporn 2 years ago