Richter really breathes life into these pieces. Many other piano greats make the WTC pieces sound like well-performed exercises, but with Richter you feel like he is playing what was in the composer's mind.
@ dxpdxpdxp: there is so much things to analyse about this fugue! 1st, it utilises strettos (after exposition) in the development section. Somewhere midway, the fugue theme is turned upside down (ie; inversion) in the strettos.
Thank you so much for uploading these videos!! I just can't stop watching/listening them! Bach's music is mesmerizing and mindblowing; Richter's interpration is the very best I have listened until now. Placing the music sheets as a background just makes the experience completely astounding. Thank you.
Funny enough, I wouldn't be so sure on the accuracy of your claim since "a well-tempered klavier" is something you could say a proto-type piano and not a harpsicord. I'm quite sure my harpsichord hasn't been called a klavier anywhere :)
Clave in Spanish,specifically indicated a harpsichord.
JS Bach never owned a paino and played one briefly at Sans Souci.
Chinese quote-- I don´t care if the cat is white or black, as long as it catches the rat. If one plays Bach on the piano beautifully enough, it can make the listener forget about the type of instrument. Gen Hirano for Example.
Despite the proto-intellectual chinese quotes, I think the point was missed. Yes, klavier in _general_ is any keyboard as you said even without the quasi-defined translations but the point was the _well-tempered_. HChord is hard, if not even impossible to tune into A440 (the so-called concert A) and those who know enough musical theory know that C# is different than Db even if it's the same damn key on the keyboard.
Other than that, I agree completely on beautiful music being more important!
Just because one tunes a HC to a well-tempered system does not mean one is using La at 440Hz. La could just as easily be tuned to 392 or 530 Hz. The 440 Concert A has only been around as a standard for perhaps less than a century. In order to play these pieces one must use a well-temp system, as unequal tunings break down after about 4 or more sharps or flats.
Congratulations, a winrar is you, you gets them medals and feel great for the rest of the day. English is hardly my primary language so I made a mistake.
Whatever it is called in english, in musical theory G# and Ab (for example) are not the same and has some meaning in diatonics, or whatever the right word is.
it sad....because we hate them because we have to learn them for exams...but if you listen to them...relaxed..then you can see...or hear the greatness of a composer
we hate them because we have been conditioned to hate challenges instead of understanding that only challenges can make us better at anything in life. we must change this perspective and become a new human.
j'adore bach au piano !.....Si JS vivait à notre époque il serait forcement subjugué par les possibilités orchestrales de notre piano moderne et il adapterait surement un procédé nouveau de composition pour exploiter cet instrument.......donc arretons ce conservatisme stupide qu'il faut jouer bach au clavecin ou à l'orgue !!!!!! Richter est magnifique mais ça ce n'est pas un scoop !
I thought so also intially, but if you listen to how he plays, I love that he didn't turn it into a technical exercise and tookt he time to really be musical and bring everything out. Very nice tone and touch
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
(i speak mainly about the prelude when i say this) ppl think this is a romantic recording? yikes. sounds like its being played on harpsichord. theres so much more potential for it than that. it can still sound mechanical without being devoid of character. the fugue was better, but it was still a forgettable interpretation, in my opinion.
I think I like this rendition better than Gould's, however I can't decide whether or not the fugue should be played faster or slower. I guess it's just a matter of taste
i agree bach's beauty is more in his intellect, than romanticism. he dictates a different kind of emotion, one in the sheer mathematics and interdependancy of each notes, as well as their sequences and the syncopation. it truly is essential genius at work. chopin on the other hand a different kind of genius, as many of his peices were more romantic, jazzy and kind of gave the idea its more improvised. both bach and chopin were technical masters
@shivdas99 Bach may sound "romantic" to you, but I don't think it's "Romantic" in terms of the proper definition of it. (dynamics, rubato etc) And you're right in saying Chopin loved Bach - actually it's one of the two masters Chopin admired without reservation, the other being Mozart. Mozart adored JC Bach and his sons, CPE Bach, JC Bach. But it was JS Bach who "made" the "Mozart we know today". The miraculous 5-subject fugal ending of Mozart's Jupiter Symphony epitomizes his admiration for JS
I like this version of d minor prelude. But there is one thing I dont like: Richter uses the pedal too much, I think. Thats why I prefer Glenn Gooulds way of playing this wonderfull prelude.
According to me, music is all about making an interpretation of a piece. Richter chose to interpret the music of Bach in a romantic way and I just want to say that it's nothing wrong with that. It's all about expression. You all have to stop thinking that some music must be played in a certain way. Gould is famous for his interpretation of Bach, but he also change a lot in the written music...
Because Bach´s beauty is more itellectual than musical, but you should try the flute sonatas, they are very musical, respecting flute´s capalibilites.
@Pianoplayer002 "I most like (this is youth argot - should be 'lieber') heavy metal - but unfortunately we have to analyse this fugue and I have no knowledge/awareness of counterpoint and any soprano (?), ancient or any other sounds (forms)" . This is kid's talk.
It's been years, but here's my best effort. "Uh, I prefer to listen to metal... but unfortunately we must analyze these fugues and I have no idea about counterpoint and any soprano, alto or whatever voices."
It's been years, but here's my best effort. "Uh, I prefer to listen to metal... but unfortunately we must analyze these fugues and I have no idea about counterpoint and any soprano, alto or whatever voices."
@Pianoplayer002 : Ah... I prefer to listen to metal... but, unfortunately, we must analyze this fugue, and I have no Idea of counterpoint or whatsoever soprano, alto, or any other voice ....
@Pianoplayer002 : Ah... I prefer to listen to metal... but, unfortunately, we must analyze this fugue, and I have no Idea of counterpoint or whatsoever soprano, alto, or any other voice ....
The best Prelude of Book 1, But I think it sounds better when the voice in the left hand will be played more legato, Richter plays every note (except the last 3 lines of course) staccato! A bit boring...
I was prejudiced that Bach meant intricate, formal and boring. Richter has set me straight with this prelude.
It grabs the attention in the very first bar, and keeps a firm hold of it all the way through with energy and varied delights poking out of unexpected places.
Your putting it up here has persuaded me to go out and buy Richter's whole well tempered clavier. Thank you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Although the tone has a lovely balnced contrast between milky wet and wooden dry,I
think that the metronomic unvaried placement on the beat undermines what he achieves with it.There is a pattern here...an interesting tone,some nice sforzandi and a judicious general tempo...but that really is a diet, compared to what this piece really can and should hold in terms of ideas.
I don't think this tone is a novelty for Richter, this is without a doubt a rewarding listen, but have you heard the E minor prelude of Book 1 as he plays it?
i thought baroque style should not have a wide range of expression?
AcidicFatin 1 month ago
i love music! :p wooooooooooooooooooowwowwwwwwowowowowo!!!!!
Jetstar3000 2 months ago
looooooooooooooooove d minor
Amarelaoo1 4 months ago 3
i find it sad that tik tok by kesha (parody) is a suggestion to this video...
CYYZspotter 6 months ago
Richter really breathes life into these pieces. Many other piano greats make the WTC pieces sound like well-performed exercises, but with Richter you feel like he is playing what was in the composer's mind.
pianodog81 8 months ago 3
@ dxpdxpdxp: there is so much things to analyse about this fugue! 1st, it utilises strettos (after exposition) in the development section. Somewhere midway, the fugue theme is turned upside down (ie; inversion) in the strettos.
mtv565 1 year ago
Does richter use pedal in the fugue or prelude? or is it just the audio?
AndyMajia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is it a yamaha your playing on?
qwerty60000 1 year ago
is it yahama your playing on?
qwerty60000 1 year ago
Richter is awesome! I'm learning this piece right now
pianovirtuoso1000 1 year ago
Reminds me of the ending theme from season two of Victorian Romance Emma.
Putting this on my short list for grade 10!
3FrenchFries 1 year ago
lovely playing!
jordantrevayne 1 year ago
The last three bars of that prelude came out of nowhere! I love Bach...
PhysiqueQuantique 1 year ago
loved this since i was a little kid of age 8
Engraverwilliam 1 year ago
Thank you so much for uploading these videos!! I just can't stop watching/listening them! Bach's music is mesmerizing and mindblowing; Richter's interpration is the very best I have listened until now. Placing the music sheets as a background just makes the experience completely astounding. Thank you.
MrAVE78 1 year ago 2
This sounds great - such a melodic and singing style I love it
AhhThatGuy 1 year ago
Thisis proness XD
grandchase890 1 year ago
the tone is incredible.. so soft..
love it
PianoGirl555 1 year ago
Absolutely sublime.
ultramagellan 1 year ago
I'm so gonna cover this song with my banjo
eddhy 1 year ago
the piano is slightly sharp.. great playing
ccen1 1 year ago
Thank you for yhe post!!
leonidas2956 2 years ago
six part ending
3NUNS 2 years ago
That's great!!!!!!
RaDi486 2 years ago
Fantastico!
doodlahoo 2 years ago 3
Rebe!!
PianoPlayer004 2 years ago
This is simply great...
Piano certainly is the king of all instruments.
THANKS!
PianoPlayer004 2 years ago 4
@PianoPlayer004 : Yes, but on Tuesdays only.
3NUNS 2 years ago
If you need a challenge then you may try to play this on a harpsichord, the instrument Bach had in mind.
Do you want to rewrite Bach´s intentions?
mrmolinodelahoz 2 years ago
Funny enough, I wouldn't be so sure on the accuracy of your claim since "a well-tempered klavier" is something you could say a proto-type piano and not a harpsicord. I'm quite sure my harpsichord hasn't been called a klavier anywhere :)
DragstMan 2 years ago
Klavier translates to keyboard.
Clavecin in French
Clave in Spanish,specifically indicated a harpsichord.
JS Bach never owned a paino and played one briefly at Sans Souci.
Chinese quote-- I don´t care if the cat is white or black, as long as it catches the rat. If one plays Bach on the piano beautifully enough, it can make the listener forget about the type of instrument. Gen Hirano for Example.
mrmolinodelahoz 2 years ago
Despite the proto-intellectual chinese quotes, I think the point was missed. Yes, klavier in _general_ is any keyboard as you said even without the quasi-defined translations but the point was the _well-tempered_. HChord is hard, if not even impossible to tune into A440 (the so-called concert A) and those who know enough musical theory know that C# is different than Db even if it's the same damn key on the keyboard.
Other than that, I agree completely on beautiful music being more important!
DragstMan 2 years ago
@DragstMan
Just because one tunes a HC to a well-tempered system does not mean one is using La at 440Hz. La could just as easily be tuned to 392 or 530 Hz. The 440 Concert A has only been around as a standard for perhaps less than a century. In order to play these pieces one must use a well-temp system, as unequal tunings break down after about 4 or more sharps or flats.
BaroqueComposer 1 year ago
@DragstMan
Oh and in 12-tone equal temperament, C# and Db are enharmonically the exact same thing.
BaroqueComposer 1 year ago
@BaroqueComposer
Enharmonically, yes, but not in musical theory as I stated before. No matter though.
DragstMan 1 year ago
@DragstMan
You have contradicted yourself. Enharmonic tones *are* theoretical.
"Notes that are spelled differently but sound the same are said to be enharmonic." quoted from "Tonal Harmony," Sixth Edition, S. Kostka & D. Payne.
As this is found in the leading *music theory* textbook, your assertion is incorrect.
BaroqueComposer 1 year ago
@BaroqueComposer
Congratulations, a winrar is you, you gets them medals and feel great for the rest of the day. English is hardly my primary language so I made a mistake.
Whatever it is called in english, in musical theory G# and Ab (for example) are not the same and has some meaning in diatonics, or whatever the right word is.
DragstMan 1 year ago
elle est retrouvée
quoi?
l'éternité
c'est la mer allée avec le soleil
Rimbaud.
hedones 2 years ago
beautiful
chunnnli 2 years ago 7
Fantastic
frederickfrederikfre 2 years ago 4
Reverb made it very melodious and haunting. Effects plus playing made it superb. Thanks.
chaiyah17 2 years ago 3
Yeah I agree with darkkerrigan, very melodious, very musical. Beautiful playing:)
sumirei001 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bach or scarlatti?
laurensbon 2 years ago
do you think you could upload bach goldberg varitations?
ryab55 2 years ago
capolavoro. sviatolslav rulz.
francescaemc2 2 years ago
it sad....because we hate them because we have to learn them for exams...but if you listen to them...relaxed..then you can see...or hear the greatness of a composer
maribavou 2 years ago 30
we hate them because we have been conditioned to hate challenges instead of understanding that only challenges can make us better at anything in life. we must change this perspective and become a new human.
bergeronf 2 years ago
@maribavou They practically learn the exams for me, I can't concentrate without music, and I sing along with the normal music. This enhances my brain
florryworry 11 months ago
@maribavou : don't do examinations
MusicPredominates 4 months ago
@maribavou learning vs. hate kinda suggests re evaluation
Bruce88keys 4 months ago
I think that this piano is a very good level of "brightness", meaning that it is not to bright and not too dull
squash012 2 years ago 2
@squash012 i agree
PianoGirl555 1 year ago
j'adore bach au piano !.....Si JS vivait à notre époque il serait forcement subjugué par les possibilités orchestrales de notre piano moderne et il adapterait surement un procédé nouveau de composition pour exploiter cet instrument.......donc arretons ce conservatisme stupide qu'il faut jouer bach au clavecin ou à l'orgue !!!!!! Richter est magnifique mais ça ce n'est pas un scoop !
TwoWoods13 2 years ago
I listen to this music every day befoer I begin yo play pino!
MyLordLoke 2 years ago 2
Amazing! Fast and perfect! =D
MyLordLoke 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not fast enough for my taste :S
Thebookguy1 2 years ago
I thought so also intially, but if you listen to how he plays, I love that he didn't turn it into a technical exercise and tookt he time to really be musical and bring everything out. Very nice tone and touch
darkkerrigan 2 years ago 2
*****
bayanista 2 years ago
I love the timbre. Richter's control of the emotional nuances of the song is amazing.
My only complaint is the lack of a trill on the Picardy third.... lol
evaniax 2 years ago 4
gah i hafta play this for my recital
xrevenantwings 2 years ago
nice piece. Thanks for posting.
BeammeupSpotty 2 years ago 3
That was so good!
MyLordLoke 3 years ago
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
pianojeans 3 years ago 9
someone marked you as spam ... god knows why!
sailingforde04 2 years ago 2
I love this :)
dzeljpiano 3 years ago 4
Que gran intérprete Hoy tan olvidado.!!
debartzen 3 years ago 4
(i speak mainly about the prelude when i say this) ppl think this is a romantic recording? yikes. sounds like its being played on harpsichord. theres so much more potential for it than that. it can still sound mechanical without being devoid of character. the fugue was better, but it was still a forgettable interpretation, in my opinion.
oceanboy1993 3 years ago
Harpsichord sounds better than Piano.
PoopShitMario 3 years ago
Fugue starts at 1:27
hornuser 3 years ago
I've got Richter's WTC recording,so I wonder
if he did ever record some more Bach-
Thx for infos.
indigoblue555 3 years ago
this displays such concinnity as i was taught
LaserZoom 3 years ago
I think I like this rendition better than Gould's, however I can't decide whether or not the fugue should be played faster or slower. I guess it's just a matter of taste
vcupiano 3 years ago
Lovely!
GorbyGwapoh 3 years ago
i agree bach's beauty is more in his intellect, than romanticism. he dictates a different kind of emotion, one in the sheer mathematics and interdependancy of each notes, as well as their sequences and the syncopation. it truly is essential genius at work. chopin on the other hand a different kind of genius, as many of his peices were more romantic, jazzy and kind of gave the idea its more improvised. both bach and chopin were technical masters
shivdas99 3 years ago 4
@shivdas99 Bach may sound "romantic" to you, but I don't think it's "Romantic" in terms of the proper definition of it. (dynamics, rubato etc) And you're right in saying Chopin loved Bach - actually it's one of the two masters Chopin admired without reservation, the other being Mozart. Mozart adored JC Bach and his sons, CPE Bach, JC Bach. But it was JS Bach who "made" the "Mozart we know today". The miraculous 5-subject fugal ending of Mozart's Jupiter Symphony epitomizes his admiration for JS
2009xellos 1 year ago
@2009xellos I made a typo there, when JC Bach is first mentioned, it's supposed to be JS* Bach
2009xellos 1 year ago
I LOVE THE WELL-TEMPERED CLAVIER SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am totally a Bach fanatic...omg love this prelude and fugue!
thanks for posting
bubblykings 3 years ago
This is fantastic!!! 10 points!!!
AGLMIL 3 years ago
I play this one! I love it!
rcgtec 3 years ago
Hey this fugue shares common material with one of the chatechismal organ preludes on the Trinity.
3NUNS 3 years ago
Such good control
3NUNS 3 years ago
I like this version of d minor prelude. But there is one thing I dont like: Richter uses the pedal too much, I think. Thats why I prefer Glenn Gooulds way of playing this wonderfull prelude.
diebsound 3 years ago
According to me, music is all about making an interpretation of a piece. Richter chose to interpret the music of Bach in a romantic way and I just want to say that it's nothing wrong with that. It's all about expression. You all have to stop thinking that some music must be played in a certain way. Gould is famous for his interpretation of Bach, but he also change a lot in the written music...
Glagolitus 3 years ago 2
it could well be the recording.
prismsmiles 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why couldn't bach make one fugue to sound like first five seconds...cause first five seconds are so inspiring :)
matkishacro12 3 years ago
Because Bach´s beauty is more itellectual than musical, but you should try the flute sonatas, they are very musical, respecting flute´s capalibilites.
ilshatt 3 years ago
Hmmm... I think it is equally beautiful, both musically and intellectually ;)
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago 3
yust loved every note!!!
ROCKGUITARMEM 3 years ago
bach was a totally badass! we need men like bach today to lead us!
kingstravinsky101 3 years ago 35
Nobody could have put it better!
pdembers 3 years ago 2
Great Idea...To see "sources" of Genius and hear at the same time R I C H T E R.
sam0xin 3 years ago 3
very nice!
FREEASTHESTARS 3 years ago
the music is very good.
jowillkit 3 years ago
äh...ich hör ja lieba metal...
aber leider müsssen wir diese fuge analysieren.^^ und ich habe keine ahnung von kontrapunkten und irgendwelchen sopran, alt oder sonstwas stimmen. ;)
go6go6go6 3 years ago
Lol, this is what I got from google translator (and that made more sense than yahoo!):
"uh ... I hear yes lieba metal ...
but unfortunately we have to do this analysis. ^ ^ and I have no ahnung of kontrapunkten and any sopran, old or whatever vote"
Could someone translate this correctly? :P
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
hihi i can try with three years of school english, maybe you will understand (but sorry it is not a good english^^)
well..i love to hear heavy metal at all...but unfortunatey we have to interpret this weird play at school(Fuge?)
and i have not any knowledge about stuff like that (either i dont know anything about contra points, topics, sopran, old, bass and things like that)
your comments soounds strange and professionel to me. ;-) when i hear my music, i just enjoy it.not interprete :-)
go6go6go6 3 years ago
ah i see what you mean. But once you interpret the music, it becomes a thousand times more beautiful.
xxh3llfir3xx 3 years ago
yes i can imagine, but actually it sounds strange to me. ;-)
but bach has been a geniee, hasn*t he?
go6go6go6 3 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Based on my 3 years of high school German, he said something like:
"Uh, I'd rather hear metal...
but unfortunately we must analyze this fugue, and I have no idea about counterpoint and (sic) any soprano, alto or other such voices."
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
@Pianoplayer002
He says I love this, but it's unfortunate that we have to analyze anything. I don't know anything about counterpoint or soprano, alto, etc.
CodyNelsonMusic 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002 "I most like (this is youth argot - should be 'lieber') heavy metal - but unfortunately we have to analyse this fugue and I have no knowledge/awareness of counterpoint and any soprano (?), ancient or any other sounds (forms)" . This is kid's talk.
gerhold101 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002
After 2 years if you'd still mind I can do that :)
Ah... I'd rather listen to metal...
But unfortunately we must analyse these fugues.^^ And I don't know anything about counterpoint and sopranos, altos or such voices. ;)
lol I'm too late :)
animumaurarium 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002 with pleasure
ahh....bach is such a great composer.
I think that this is a beautiful piece because it shows the beauty of polyphony trans
Martel211996 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002
It's been years, but here's my best effort. "Uh, I prefer to listen to metal... but unfortunately we must analyze these fugues and I have no idea about counterpoint and any soprano, alto or whatever voices."
changchubdorje 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pianoplayer002
It's been years, but here's my best effort. "Uh, I prefer to listen to metal... but unfortunately we must analyze these fugues and I have no idea about counterpoint and any soprano, alto or whatever voices."
changchubdorje 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002 : Ah... I prefer to listen to metal... but, unfortunately, we must analyze this fugue, and I have no Idea of counterpoint or whatsoever soprano, alto, or any other voice ....
LOL
dxpdxpdxp 1 year ago
@Pianoplayer002 : Ah... I prefer to listen to metal... but, unfortunately, we must analyze this fugue, and I have no Idea of counterpoint or whatsoever soprano, alto, or any other voice ....
LOL
dxpdxpdxp 1 year ago
I like it! Amazing! Wonderful! Thank you for this piece!!!
arturanna2000 3 years ago
Listening to him since I was 6........and on one day you find out that Bach does never let you alone.
Just empty words?Emotional excess?Not really. Words coming from a 50years exp.-
You can believe me.
indigoblue555 3 years ago 2
The best Prelude of Book 1, But I think it sounds better when the voice in the left hand will be played more legato, Richter plays every note (except the last 3 lines of course) staccato! A bit boring...
sb0090 3 years ago
Not so. I think the contrast between the short, punchy bass and legato upper voice gives the piece depth and dialogue.
JarusYarus 3 years ago
you found the correct words to express what I think and feel about Bach's music
elenanthi 3 years ago
Thank you so much for posting pieces from wtc with the score.
IIPianista 3 years ago
I love this piece. thank you for posting.
dubaiforty 3 years ago
Thank you for posting these Bach/Richter pieces with the score.
palcsi 3 years ago
i usually listen to Richter play big stuff by rach or chopin, this is the first time i listen to him play Bach's WTC.
Intense.
Jibejibe 4 years ago
I was prejudiced that Bach meant intricate, formal and boring. Richter has set me straight with this prelude.
It grabs the attention in the very first bar, and keeps a firm hold of it all the way through with energy and varied delights poking out of unexpected places.
Your putting it up here has persuaded me to go out and buy Richter's whole well tempered clavier. Thank you.
Rapier686 4 years ago 2
Picardy Third FTW!!!!!
TheLoneSergeant 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Although the tone has a lovely balnced contrast between milky wet and wooden dry,I
think that the metronomic unvaried placement on the beat undermines what he achieves with it.There is a pattern here...an interesting tone,some nice sforzandi and a judicious general tempo...but that really is a diet, compared to what this piece really can and should hold in terms of ideas.
smithsherman 4 years ago
I don't think this tone is a novelty for Richter, this is without a doubt a rewarding listen, but have you heard the E minor prelude of Book 1 as he plays it?
znanto 3 years ago
I'm not the one who is playing... You've never heard of Sviatoslav Richter?
Pianoplayer002 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow...u play very clear n very bach!!!
Im playing this piece rite now~~~
wish I could play as good as you~~~^^
starrylis 4 years ago
Wonderfull recording! Very clear lines and simple phrasing, without overdoing. Please post more of Richter. Thank you very much
z556 4 years ago
You can probably get all of Richter's 48 for about $20 - $30. Peerless performances, especially Book I.
mltube 4 years ago