@tonymultani : Krisha = Vishnu = Cheater "But he only cheats with Cheaters " !!! Loose characters and immorals who do bad things to achieve their goals by any means. U must bea pakistani asshole :)
@tonymultani : Multani ?? I am guessing u must be a fucking cunt who just likes to get on by making lewd comments about hindus and their tradtions and historical figures ?? If you are not a paki or hindu then u must be a muslim who hates hindus or a sikh from canada who also happen to hate hindus ?? I am trying to figure out please help me as I need to get to the bottom of this shit in ur head which makes u say "krishna = vishnu =cheater "
Two wrongs don't make a right, you idiot Krishna, just 'cause someone wronged you doesn't mean you should do the same wrong to them, it doesn't make you any better of a person than those who wronged you. Balarama should have killed that coward Bheem right then and there.
@sujoyetc You are an idiot to say something like that, India needs great souls like Bheeshma, Dronacharya, and Karna as her leaders, not immoral cowards who stab everyone in the back.
look for this video --> mongoloid_in_the_himalayas|view from anthropologist|
and most of your questions will be answered. this documentary explore kiratis from nepal to NE India.
In ancient time, Kirat King Bhagatddatta from Assam and Kirat King Yalamber from Nepal were together as one along with chinese armies to fight the Indian Pandavas led by their general krishna in the Mahabharata war. Nepal and NE India should merge to form greater Nepal.
@feludaify :It is similar to your coices . We have wisdom of being harmless , being lawful , being a supporter of Love and not hatred , Being a supporter of Non Voilence etc . But our emotions are strong and corrupt , that takes over your wisdom unnoticed . Men engage themselves in to voilence , crime etc knowingly . Haven't you heard of a saying , Snake poison can be cured by its poison only. Similarly , Corrupt EGO (Duryodhana) can be destroyed by means of corrupt means only...
Im from Sri Lanka.I wonder who are Arnold Schwezenegar or silvestor stalon in front of Puneet Issar.what a masculinity.what a manly chest. I feel that Indian men are far manly than the entire west.
and yet, after all this, pandav vansh only lasted upto parikshits son, where as kuru vansh ruled till 500 BC where they were with Magadh raja Bimbisar. After the fight with Vaishali,when Bimbisar became buddhist, the small kings (kurus were one of those) gradually disappeared...tells you evil has much longer roots...like weed that has long and strong root...
@tycoonpratik: reason is he was using the divyaasshtara during that war.. as he said before the war that he doesn't want people to say that arjun won the war because of divyaasshtara ..
The one thing I just do not understand about Mahabharat is this:
How did Arjun defeat all opponent leading warriors in the war of Virat single handedly, but in this Dharma war even with the help of Bhima and Krishna, Arjun took this long?!?!? And that to he had to by using deceit???
@tycoonpratik In the Virat War he used special weapons that he had obtained from Indra but he promised he would not used these weapons during the kurukshetra war as these were mayavi weapons.
@tycoonpratik dear in virat yudh no maharathi wants war against arjun, they are just disgusting, and bhishma drona and other maharathi thought about agayatavas only their main aim was just minimum fight with arjun as arjun fought not for him he fought for virat, in dharmyudha they fought with brain not heart
In viraat Yudh..he made them unconscious..nd tuk their vastra...din kill them....sure he ws a mighty warrior..nd he cud do it again..but its against war rules..2 kill opponent wen he s unconscious..Bhisma had ichha mrutyu..nd he din wan 2 brk rules durin Karna wadh..Krishna askd hm 2..bcoz Karna nd Drona...both did dat 2 Abhimanyu..
there can't be any intricate Epic like Mahabharat in feelings and emotions yet with Love and human attachments ! It is the best effort by BR Chopra to bring it to the screen ! as much as your rajshri to bring it here ! - Namaste !
Yeah. Bhim was "PRATIGYABADHH".And although if Bhim was not,his brother Shree Krishna will not let him to give Bhim death penalty for breaking Duryodhan's thigh. Madhusudhan always carrys some tricks with him.
Shri Rama killed most warrior in ramayana with the help of secrets leaked by vibhishana is that cheating?. Even Meghnad was attacked while he was busy worshipping nikumbala. Its tit for tat.
I don't know for some reason I like Karna better than Arjuna.
Arjuna had everything since birth and Karna had unfair life
In my opinion Karna is better warrior than Arjuna coz if its not for Lord Krishna, Arjuna would have been defeated long ago by Bhisma pitama or Dronacharya or Karna
Karna was born as symbol of donator n frienship...
Who can be the greatest Hero of this pic but Duryodhan who faught till the end, losing every support eventually ? yet knowing that ShriKrihna is on opposite side ! Duryodha is Hero also because as knowing his father's mis-deeds !
whole epic teaches us "Dharma" and the consequences of not following it. I believe even though Pandavas were victorious in the end doesn't mean that they deserved victory and it was worth. "Folks" don't take me wrong there was victory, but it was "neither side" because "korvas" and "Pandavas" both did cheat during their respective fights. I feel "Krishna" was Victorious in establishing "Dharma" and peace during that "yuga" (Treta Yuga) and leaves earth just before the arrival of "kali yug."
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
Hi everyone according to my point of view i think God Krishna have done for all of us so we can understand the right or wrong about life...each veer death teach us some thing , friendship, dharm , truth , mother , way .. etc so in short they have died for us thousand and thosand. we should respect their deed atleast we should walk in right way i believe ... i try myself sometime ... thanks
bheem broke the rules.is ladai ke baad pandavon ne samose manga liye honge.kyonki duryodhan ke saamaan ki to chutney bana di.itni badi 200 kg ki gada jab udhar padi hogi ?? " O CHOTU EK KAAM KAR . BHAG KE JA AUR SHARMA JI KI DUKAAN SE SAMOSE LE AA.AUR SUN CHUTNEY MAT LANA.HUMARE PAAS HAI "
wow how come dharamraj yudhistir say that a kshatriya isnt born kshatriya...he is transformed into one by his valour or courage...they never deterred to call karan a sut putra....
i get that a lot of people try to explain the Mahabharata and each one has his or her own opinion and version, but i gotta say why can't people just enjoy the epic: the brilliant dialogues, the political agenda and, most awesome of all, the melodramatic fighting and overemphatic archer bouts. i think this is just awesome! i wish i could understand hindi (that's what they're speaking right?), that way i would not just contextualize, but have a better understanding of the overall epic.
@mit3inn thanks buddy! i only speak that which sounds real, as the saying goes you can take the horse to the lake but you can't make it drink the water...hmm same thing with people, you can convince them in more ways than one of your point, but true charisma comes from natural attention and captivation of people's attention with simple and educative language that doesn't require an entire 22 pages of conviction to get to the essential point...personally one or two remarks suffice
@NickCheduoRebel yeah u r absolutely correct mate n if u wanna watch mahabharat with english subtitles it is available on torrentz. u can download it. BTW where r u from?
@mit3inn ahh thanks for letting me know mate, i'll definitely check it out..i am from Kenya, but my origins are Indian, Gujarat to be precise..i just never got the chance to learn hindi, but it is a part of my future plans...i appreciate the language and i'm sure i'll acquire it one day! how about yourself?
@NickCheduoRebel I am from Vadodara(baroda) off course in Gujarat.
my lang is gujarati. yeah u can learn hindi easily. is der nyone still speaking hindi or gujarati in ur family?if yes then it'll b very easy 4 u to learn.
All the talk about bias against Kauravs in Mahabharat is only by those who do not listen to the entire conversations, & have definitely not read the Epic. They are like the 6 blind men fighting over what the elephant looks like.
@gochee99 actually, no. the mahabharata shows all its characters as imperfect human beings, even the "good guys". yudhisthira is an asshole for being addicted to gambling and staking his brothers and wife. drona's favouritism of arjuna to the point where he asks self-taught archer ekalavya to cut off his thumb is unconscionable. bhisma ruining amba's life for his vow. it's only this series that tries to justify whatever the "good guys" do and condemn whatever the "bad guys" do.
tudhisthir was really really a nalayak... jo muh main aaya bol gaya..... tatta...... without knowing anything..... jis marzi se yudh kar lo duryodhan... hathiyar bhi tum hi chuno paridwandi bhi..... iti sharafat insan main nahi murk main hoti hai..... agar Shri krishan na hote to pandav kabhi nahi jeet sakte the chahe wo sache hi kyu na the.. jitne ke liye takat ke saath - saath dimag ki bhi zarurat hoti hai jo kam se kam yudhisthir ke paas to bilkul nahi tha.....
jeetne ke liye taakat ke saath dimag ki hi nahi ek aur cheez ki zarurat hoti hai....bhagwan ka ashirwad
iska sirf ye matlab hai ke agar aap sahi kaam karo aur fair kaam karo to bhagwan aapke saath honge aur kisi bhi haalat mein aapki jeet nishchit karenge
dude thakur....why do u misundestand yudhirstir there? he did absolutely the same thing what a kshatriya should do..he also knows that none other than bhim can face duryodhan among them..but still he dont want to do injustice..so he told duryodhan to choose one among them and fight.....if he had been a bad guy, he would have asked duryodhan to fight bhim at first talk itself....none of the people in the world were great dharmatma(exclude krishna bhagavan) than yudhistir in dwaparyug
dude that's so obvious!! ever seen any woman keep a secret? I guess not.... the effect is that women chatter a lot and can't keep any thing to themselves :)
duryodhana and company killed abhimanyu when he was not on his chariot and armless? was that accd to kshatriya dharma??? is insulting a woman accd to sharma???then how the hell was he the only person honoured in heaven???
Bhishma & Vidur are born in earth only due to their crimes in previous births. While Bhishma was cursed by Sage Vasishta for stealing his cow Nandhini, Vidura, who was dharmadevatha, passed a wrong judgment on Sage aani mandavya who cursed him to be born in earth.
There's an incident that interested me related to this. When Dhuryodhan is dying he tells Krishna about how he dies a brave warrior, while how Pandavas live with so many deceits. After this celestials start pouring flowers on him!!!! Krishna appeared for the welfare of dharma and the celestials. When they are praising His enemy, and even though He had the capability of instantly slaying the celestials, He does nothing!!..like the one who is truly unaffected by defamy.
ram and laxman were better besides brahmastra was possessed by both karna and arjun too meghnath was good following his fathers orders but he was evil
Meghnad lived thousands of years before Mahabharat, why are you comparing him to Arjun? It's like cmparing Apples to Oranges. You can't decide which one is better because both are different
I respectfully disagree. his other name was Indrajeet,who won over Lord Indra, the finest warrior in the skies. Meghnad knew that Lord Ram and Prince Laxman were not mere humans, but he stuck to his father's side and fought Laxman to death.Laxman had to go to the cave and kill him before he could complete his yagya, otherwise it would have been impossible to defeat him.
I know that his other name was indrajeet..but he was a bloody demon who supported his father. Lets see you encourage someone kidnapping your wife..He's such an insult both him and his father whom he supported..you think this is human? he fought laxman to death? for your kind information he hid and shot laxman using maya..which again he did not fight fair enough..Laxman (avatar of sheshnag) and Ram(avatar of Vishnu) were born as humans in ram avatar not with their powers unlike krishna avatar
May be you my friend will have the capacity to support adharma and watch it grow immortal but one way or the other adharma has to be killed. So whats your point basically..You supporting Indrajeet as a warrior?? Hes a bloody coward who brought another women in guise of sita and killed her to mentally attack Ram it was during that time he attacked Laxman while he was helping ram to revive from that shock.. Hes a bloody idiot who supports his dad who robs wives...and you stand beside him..go ahead
And just because he's won over Indra..it doesn't mean hes the king of the world..Indra was created by paramathma, Indra Apart from having his good character goes in disguise of other people to enjoy their wives(Story of Ahalya who ram revived), knows luxury. dance, drinking, has way better Ego than any asura(Krishna avatar mount govardhan Story)...From Hiranyaksha to hiranyakasibhu to ravan to Kamsa..he was always pulped to dust and it was Vishnu who came in nick of time defeating the asuras.
I agree Meghnad was skilled warrior at using maya..but supporting his father's idioticity was the biggest mistake he ever did..tell me would ravan stay back if someone kidnapped mandodhari..may b e he would who knows. all asuras have a good part i agree but it is their adharma that puts them towards the bad side. One should be like Vibheeshan, even though he betrayed his kingdom he stood by dharma that makes him perfect. If i meghnad i would advice my father rather than supporting him..
Meghnad did not support his father's idiocy, he infact went to him after fighting laxmanji and confided To Ravan that Shri Ram is Indeed Lord Narayana and that he should make peace asap.
But this warning fell on deaf ears and Ravan questioned Meghnad's bravery and called him a coward. It was at this instance that Meghnad agreed to fight Shri Ram because his father wished him to do so even though he knew he would die, he would not betray his fathers word as per his warrior code.
" whats that you say?? you mean to say what laxman's act was cowardly...Don't you know Vishnu's words. He says to Kill adharma there is nothing wrong in bending the rules of dharma behind which adharma is hiding. Indrajeet had to perform the Nikumbala Devi yagya by which he grew immortal, everyone knows ramayan. My friend you may help a thousand poor people but killing a rat makes all the good that you got go to biter waste. Though ravan was best shiva bhaktha kidnapping sita ruined hischaracter
can someone please explain, why they projected the birth of this baby (Uttara's son Parikishita) -episode 92 as such a big deal as if the Pandava generation would end,; because any of the pandavas could have re-married and had more kids>>>.wouldnt be as simple as that?? please explain..
What was Duryodhan then who was trying to kill the pandavas from day 1. You are offcourse entitled to your opinion but I must say that the moral of the story has eluded you.
why does not this is again shown on TV? Why is that stupid sas-bahu serials of Ekta Kappor is being shown which is meaningless to our lives? Those serial has actually resulted in extra- marital affairs. Those serials should be stopped instead such serials like Mahabharat and Ramayan should be telecasted
After learing all the comments done prior to me, I am shocked that there are such a uncivilised persons in our society and our world. At first, Everyone should respect all the epic of all religion, whether it is MAHABHARAT or KURAN or BIBLE. If one can not respect others religion, he has no right to make such a heinous comments on other's religion. Secondly, If any one make abuse on other's religion, there is no need to reply to him on the way of that particular person.
@yadavmunna well I find no reason to respect your religion. and i can make any heinous comments on any religion i want. it is called freedom of speech. if you dont like them, dont read them. but you have no right to determine what my rights are.
@zamriash yes you can make any heinous comment on any religion but just from behind your computer, like a coward exercising your freedom of speech. Certainly we cannot determine others' right, but others do not have any right to free verbal abuse. Right to speech does not mean right to abuse. For you it means yes because you were certainly born and brought up among a disrespectful environment where hate speeches were taught!
@MrSatrajitgupta which of my comments were you so offended by? and where did i abuse your religion? do you know what you are talking about? it is unfortunate that you are behind the keyboard of a computer yourself. if you were in front of me, i would have seen the embarrassment on your face as you tried to answer these questions. and what does my upbringing have to do with freedom of speech? are you trying to equate status with birth, as is the tradition in india?
why dau (BALRAM) always supported duryudhan .... he didnt told him anything when he did Chaal n kapat ,,,,,, why he always supported an ADHARMI ,, can any one reply .........
but as they bhim was also his student ,,,,,, an he was also the best as they told him sarvsherstha gadhadhari ,,,,,,,, but arjun was the supporter of DHARAM ,,,,,,
He did not support the war - took sanyasi or some piligrim yatra and did not fight with Duryodhan. Also, Duryodhan was a very good disciple and always took good care of Balram. He won the heart of Balrm through his good behaviour. Remember, he disliked Pandavas very much but liked Balram a lot. Also, history says that Duryodhan was a good king and was just to the people in his kingdom.
Although Duryodhan was adamant kid, but he never disobyed Balram and respected him a lot.
Sara 1511 !! its not proper to call names to the god(for billions hindu's)..if u dont know or dont care then its not needed to insult others idiol cz it may hurt many peoples feelings which u already can see by the reactions.
I can't believe Duryodhan being such a great warrior didn't see the thigh attack coming, even though he didn't get the special protection on his legs he should have known that Bhim would attack him there, Bhim even told him he would prior to the fight. Duryodham and Karna should have been on Bhim and Arjun like super glue in beginning of the war, they waited too long and got beaten.
and pandu was the king when he asked dhritarastra to look after the throne till then so in that case yudi becomes the king, because dhrit was never crowned as king he was just a pratinidhi of pandu
U have less knowledge, duryodhan maybe a great hero but he was not capable of being a king and whole hastinapur knew that. king bharat also crowned shantanu the king according to his abilities and didnt crown his son. so king bharat's parampara is whoever is capable of being a king should be crowned and not just because he is the son of the king. look at the earlier episodes u will come to know what i mean.
hi SARA 1511 i am ur wellwisher. i sure u must be a muslim and u need 2 cnslt psychiatrist. mind it little knwldg is a dngrs thing. u r free 2 exprs ur views bt dont show ur so called sanskar. by d way do u knw what sanskar is dont ask to ur father as he would be unable
Attempt to murder on Bhim in childhood, attempt to murder on all the pandavs after that Udishthir was named Yvraaj, wanting to undress his sister in law in front of everyone, is this the meaning of Veer to you??
I am afraid to say that i think you haven t understand a word of this story!!!
sara 511 or whatever, pity on you watching mahabharat and abusing also. people who have respect towards mahabharat should only watch it and not loosers like u
this whole story tells tht dharma must be saved even with wrong tectics. this also shows the changing times from ramayana where lord rama didnt do anything wrong. a big contrast between lord rama and lord krishna. but mahabharat closer to we people as there is good and bad in all of us. kauravas had to repay for their wrong deeds. and i feel king dhritrashtra was the biggest culprit in the intire epic.
Yes, I agree. Couldnt have said it better myself. Mahabharat is a more real story, since it shows good and bad in everyone. And I agree, Dhritarashtra was the real culprit who could have prevented the war.
Lord Rama killed Bali without his (Bali's) knowledge. Lakshamana killed Meghnath when he was praying for additional siddhis. So, you see in Ramayana too, there was tactics used. The thing is Dharma should be protected at all costs.
You are right, the point I was making is that Lakshmana didn't wait for Meghnath to finish his puja. He challenged him right then and there, forced Meghnath to bear arms and then killed him in a battle which was fought in the cave where he was conducting the puja.
why should he wait.. he was just protecting dharma and for that even lord krishna says that one should take any steps to protect it.. well lord rama did not say that but he proved tht statement when he killed bali.. if that puja wud have been done then the outcome of the war wud have been totally opposite.. which wud be wrong. moreover it was war time and indrajeet was busy doing puja.. war had already started it was just one another day.. in between war such things are not acceptable
You are essentially making the same point that I stated two posts ago: "Dharma should be protected at all costs even though it may mean breaking a few rules of engagement". I don't see the contradiction.
Yep, Krishna is ready to let Yudi and Co. bear the sin of doing some wrong deeds so that Dharma for the whole people be protected.
Also, Yudister was infact ready to lie and carry the burden of a sin so that the people of Hastinapur can live happily later on in Dharmic rule... Infact, Pandavas are ready to bear the burden by breaking the rules so that dharma in a large scale is protected.
this kind of 100% utilitarian dharma is very dangerous. basically, it says the end justifies the means. this is the same kind of logic that pres. bush used to justify torture and detention without trial (in the name of the greater good of stopping terrorism so that fewer people in the world will suffer from terrorism).
Lot of caution must be observed in following this kind of utilitarian Dharma. It is very possible that people can make a mess of things and then try to defend it by the same concept. Your example is also perfect.
Having said this, we shall not discard this completely either but have it as a backup tool that may be very very useful sometimes. My post above is to bring this concept up when someone probably did not understand the same and raised a question.
@SatyaVenugopal Bush did it by pretending to do it for the greater good, as is preached by christianity (the pretence, & deception I mean). He is the impersonification of Duryodhan, who cannot look beyond himself. Pandavas, on the other hand, had tried very hard to avoid the war. And this was reiterated even by Karn, who refused to accept Indraprasth, for he would feel obliged to give it to D, who was most undeserving of it, & Indraprasth deserved better
@aparaajita10 you missed my point entirely. i didn't say pandavas = bush. i said krishna's 100% utilitarian dharma is dangerous if taken to extremes, because then it can be used to justify anything. esrujan hit the nail on the head when s/he said a lot of caution must be used when applying this logic.
and why the unnecessary attack on christianity? the bible doesn't preach deception, even if many of its followers disregard the bible's call for truth and end up deceiving people into conversion.
@SatyaVenugopal The attack on christianity was absolutely necessary, for it got u saying that it is not the bible, but some of the people doing that, i,e. it is a social problem not a religious one. But Hindu Dharm is never given that concession. The abuse of the varna (wrongly labeled caste) system, that was a true division of labor & allocation of responsibility has been tagged on to the religion & that is what the christians are using to re-enslave Hindus.
@SatyaVenugopal and u yourself have countered your statement...Krishn keeps trying to press for peace even during the war...& you seem to totally ignore each time he tells each of the Pandavas, incl. Draupadi, that the peace & life of the people fighting is far more important than their revenge. So which part of Krishn's advice is dangerous? The excuse u've given is the favorite excuse of the perpetrators. Give a long hard look to all the history & u will know what I am saying.
@SatyaVenugopal One more glaring difference between the bushman & Yudhishther, Yudhishthir & Padavas are never proud & crying from rooftops about the greatness of the destruction they have caused. Yudhishther & pandavas are always sad & upset about what they have to do. But then, today, it is only, "chor uchakkey chaudhary...te lunji rann pardhaan"
@esrujan i think you use the words "in fact" too often here. let me remind you that the mahabharat is not fact. it is mythology. it would be more suited to use words like "according to what I read", or "according to one version of the story" rather than "in fact". and for you information, people "live happily later" is only a story book concept. A little bit of history reading will let you know that there is no such thing. so udhistir told a lie because he wanted to win the war. thats all.
@zamriash and even more, Mahabharat is an epic where the Lord comes in the earth to aid a family who were abused (mostly verbally), whose women were abused by immensely powerful people who thought that act to be their freedom of speech ..lol! So if you abuse somebody who has done nothing to you, or any religion which is followed by millions of human beings, then be sure you will be paid back very badly.
@MrSatrajitgupta mahabharat is the longest poem in the world. thats all. like most other poems and stories, it has a moral, or a social or political aspect that it tries to express through its verses. if you think that it is an actual story of some god from heaven coming to earth, just to save a family, u are deluded. and why do u keep saying that i am abusive? can u please point out the text in which i have been abusive to u or ur religion? it may be followed by millions, does not make it true.
@zamriash I did not intend to offend you. Only I read your remark in reply of yadavmunna where you commented "well I find no reason to respect your religion. and i can make any heinous comments on any religion i want. it is called freedom of speech. if you dont like them, dont read them. but you have no right to determine what my rights are"--- I disagreed with you on this comment and felt I should express my views on it as to me love and respect are mandatory for creating healthy society.
@MrSatrajitgupta why do you disagree with me? if you are a hindu, do you respect islam or christianity as much as hunduism? if you oppose my right of freedom of speech to say that i dont respect hinduism, at the same time, you take away your own right to say that you dont respect islam or christianity or any of the thousands of other religion in the world. why do you want to give up this right of yours? it is a very valuable right as without it, society cannot progress or be healthy.
krishna = vishnu =cheater
tonymultani 2 months ago
@tonymultani : Krisha = Vishnu = Cheater "But he only cheats with Cheaters " !!! Loose characters and immorals who do bad things to achieve their goals by any means. U must bea pakistani asshole :)
saurabhsood84 1 month ago
@saurabhsood84 put a baseball bat in yo ass bitch i aint no fucking paki or hindu
tonymultani 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tonymultani : Multani ?? I am guessing u must be a fucking cunt who just likes to get on by making lewd comments about hindus and their tradtions and historical figures ?? If you are not a paki or hindu then u must be a muslim who hates hindus or a sikh from canada who also happen to hate hindus ?? I am trying to figure out please help me as I need to get to the bottom of this shit in ur head which makes u say "krishna = vishnu =cheater "
saurabhsood84 1 month ago
lord krishna had zillions of super computers for brain or maybe it can't be measured.
qaz010wsx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Two wrongs don't make a right, you idiot Krishna, just 'cause someone wronged you doesn't mean you should do the same wrong to them, it doesn't make you any better of a person than those who wronged you. Balarama should have killed that coward Bheem right then and there.
rajbeast 3 months ago
Comment removed
rajbeast 3 months ago
@sujoyetc You are an idiot to say something like that, India needs great souls like Bheeshma, Dronacharya, and Karna as her leaders, not immoral cowards who stab everyone in the back.
rajbeast 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sujoyetc sir thanks for the input.
look for this video --> mongoloid_in_the_himalayas|view from anthropologist|
and most of your questions will be answered. this documentary explore kiratis from nepal to NE India.
In ancient time, Kirat King Bhagatddatta from Assam and Kirat King Yalamber from Nepal were together as one along with chinese armies to fight the Indian Pandavas led by their general krishna in the Mahabharata war. Nepal and NE India should merge to form greater Nepal.
diliprai 3 months ago
lord krishna's philosophy is against gandhian philosophy that as long as your goals are right the means can be corrupt.
feludaify 4 months ago
@feludaify Precisely why I would take the Mahatma any day over this corrupt "kayar".
rajbeast 3 months ago
@feludaify :It is similar to your coices . We have wisdom of being harmless , being lawful , being a supporter of Love and not hatred , Being a supporter of Non Voilence etc . But our emotions are strong and corrupt , that takes over your wisdom unnoticed . Men engage themselves in to voilence , crime etc knowingly . Haven't you heard of a saying , Snake poison can be cured by its poison only. Similarly , Corrupt EGO (Duryodhana) can be destroyed by means of corrupt means only...
truthseeker4720 1 month ago
though i am happy that pandavas are nearing victory, i feel sad dat the series will end right after this. never mind,i can watch it all over again.
feludaify 4 months ago
Well said Sri Krishna upon Balram's anger.He was wordless.
haleen23 4 months ago
Im from Sri Lanka.I wonder who are Arnold Schwezenegar or silvestor stalon in front of Puneet Issar.what a masculinity.what a manly chest. I feel that Indian men are far manly than the entire west.
haleen23 4 months ago
Nahi my foot- literally!
computermaster 5 months ago
what is the virat war?what has it to do with mahabharata?
MyLalinea 8 months ago
Really excellent!!! Hats off to Vasudev Krishna and Bheem to win over Adharma....
pradeepgururaj 8 months ago
I don't know how hard vajrakaya is, but if Bhima couldn't break through I think only a mahayogi like Shiva could.
computermaster 9 months ago
For the record, Bhima has a big brother who probably could have shattered Duryodhan's vajrakaya with one hit of his mace. "Has," not "had." :)
secusrityexpert 10 months ago
and yet, after all this, pandav vansh only lasted upto parikshits son, where as kuru vansh ruled till 500 BC where they were with Magadh raja Bimbisar. After the fight with Vaishali,when Bimbisar became buddhist, the small kings (kurus were one of those) gradually disappeared...tells you evil has much longer roots...like weed that has long and strong root...
0nman 10 months ago
Nahi my foot- Bhima was justifiably angry!
computermaster 1 year ago
historic serial which we can never forget......
lovesuck41 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik: reason is he was using the divyaasshtara during that war.. as he said before the war that he doesn't want people to say that arjun won the war because of divyaasshtara ..
naveenait4016t 1 year ago
The one thing I just do not understand about Mahabharat is this:
How did Arjun defeat all opponent leading warriors in the war of Virat single handedly, but in this Dharma war even with the help of Bhima and Krishna, Arjun took this long?!?!? And that to he had to by using deceit???
tycoonpratik 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik In the Virat War he used special weapons that he had obtained from Indra but he promised he would not used these weapons during the kurukshetra war as these were mayavi weapons.
iaarl 1 year ago 6
@tycoonpratik dear in virat yudh no maharathi wants war against arjun, they are just disgusting, and bhishma drona and other maharathi thought about agayatavas only their main aim was just minimum fight with arjun as arjun fought not for him he fought for virat, in dharmyudha they fought with brain not heart
naangiarahul 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik
In viraat Yudh..he made them unconscious..nd tuk their vastra...din kill them....sure he ws a mighty warrior..nd he cud do it again..but its against war rules..2 kill opponent wen he s unconscious..Bhisma had ichha mrutyu..nd he din wan 2 brk rules durin Karna wadh..Krishna askd hm 2..bcoz Karna nd Drona...both did dat 2 Abhimanyu..
krishnathakkar61 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys I've found one link of Mahabharat part 2 i mean the history after the war.
bwtorrents(dot)com/threads/272 686-Mahabharat-Katha-Part-2-(4 5-avi-files)-B(dot)R(dot)Chopra
mit3inn 1 year ago
Thank you Rajshri !
there can't be any intricate Epic like Mahabharat in feelings and emotions yet with Love and human attachments ! It is the best effort by BR Chopra to bring it to the screen ! as much as your rajshri to bring it here ! - Namaste !
wwinds 1 year ago 11
balram is just a fool thats all ouffffffffffff
SuperUnique11 1 year ago
Comment removed
aslambhai123211 1 year ago
Blaram is such a moron. he's praising Duryodhan while he forgets that duryodhan savagely killed his nephew Abhimanyu
str8desi 1 year ago
Yes- Krsna said they were all doomed to die, so he would not let any of the Pandavas get hurt.
computermaster 1 year ago
Balarama was silly, of course Bhima had the right to break his thigh.
computermaster 1 year ago
Comment removed
canea3474 1 year ago
Yeah. Bhim was "PRATIGYABADHH".And although if Bhim was not,his brother Shree Krishna will not let him to give Bhim death penalty for breaking Duryodhan's thigh. Madhusudhan always carrys some tricks with him.
canea3474 1 year ago 2
Shri Rama killed most warrior in ramayana with the help of secrets leaked by vibhishana is that cheating?. Even Meghnad was attacked while he was busy worshipping nikumbala. Its tit for tat.
World is not a utopia.
kundarvankumar 1 year ago
@kundarvankumar den stop ccalling da vastards god u hindus
sachinchochi 1 year ago
@sachinchochi
Then ppl might say a similar thing to you too ............ morons. They can ask you not to follow a pervert's and a pedohphile's teachings.
solusindica89 11 months ago
Shri Rama also killed most warriors in ramayana with the secrets leaked by Vibhishan. Was that cheating?
kundarvankumar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know for some reason I like Karna better than Arjuna.
Arjuna had everything since birth and Karna had unfair life
In my opinion Karna is better warrior than Arjuna coz if its not for Lord Krishna, Arjuna would have been defeated long ago by Bhisma pitama or Dronacharya or Karna
Karna was born as symbol of donator n frienship...
one should learn from Karna too
Love live Karna
Tijender 1 year ago 3
@Tijender
Only morons cannot understand the subtle nature of dharma.
solusindica89 11 months ago
Who can be the greatest Hero of this pic but Duryodhan who faught till the end, losing every support eventually ? yet knowing that ShriKrihna is on opposite side ! Duryodha is Hero also because as knowing his father's mis-deeds !
wwinds 1 year ago
whole epic teaches us "Dharma" and the consequences of not following it. I believe even though Pandavas were victorious in the end doesn't mean that they deserved victory and it was worth. "Folks" don't take me wrong there was victory, but it was "neither side" because "korvas" and "Pandavas" both did cheat during their respective fights. I feel "Krishna" was Victorious in establishing "Dharma" and peace during that "yuga" (Treta Yuga) and leaves earth just before the arrival of "kali yug."
MrVarunmahajan88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
foryatharthgeeta 1 year ago
Hi everyone according to my point of view i think God Krishna have done for all of us so we can understand the right or wrong about life...each veer death teach us some thing , friendship, dharm , truth , mother , way .. etc so in short they have died for us thousand and thosand. we should respect their deed atleast we should walk in right way i believe ... i try myself sometime ... thanks
13gemininetwork 1 year ago
२३:३५ महादेव के बारे में जो कहा गया, वह बहुत उल्लसित है! lol
kbkushalutube 1 year ago
bheem broke the rules.is ladai ke baad pandavon ne samose manga liye honge.kyonki duryodhan ke saamaan ki to chutney bana di.itni badi 200 kg ki gada jab udhar padi hogi ?? " O CHOTU EK KAAM KAR . BHAG KE JA AUR SHARMA JI KI DUKAAN SE SAMOSE LE AA.AUR SUN CHUTNEY MAT LANA.HUMARE PAAS HAI "
bhasmasur213 1 year ago
Krishnas point is very clear ! Its fair to become unfair to protect "DARMA" !
serpent7700 1 year ago
satya venugopal mind your language...
pratapgaurav2007 1 year ago
wow how come dharamraj yudhistir say that a kshatriya isnt born kshatriya...he is transformed into one by his valour or courage...they never deterred to call karan a sut putra....
souravdas1983 1 year ago
@souravdas1983 Wow! You are so right!
veekayart 1 year ago
i get that a lot of people try to explain the Mahabharata and each one has his or her own opinion and version, but i gotta say why can't people just enjoy the epic: the brilliant dialogues, the political agenda and, most awesome of all, the melodramatic fighting and overemphatic archer bouts. i think this is just awesome! i wish i could understand hindi (that's what they're speaking right?), that way i would not just contextualize, but have a better understanding of the overall epic.
NickCheduoRebel 1 year ago
@NickCheduoRebel I heartly appreciate you my friend.only ur opinion worths.
mit3inn 1 year ago
@mit3inn thanks buddy! i only speak that which sounds real, as the saying goes you can take the horse to the lake but you can't make it drink the water...hmm same thing with people, you can convince them in more ways than one of your point, but true charisma comes from natural attention and captivation of people's attention with simple and educative language that doesn't require an entire 22 pages of conviction to get to the essential point...personally one or two remarks suffice
NickCheduoRebel 1 year ago
@NickCheduoRebel yeah u r absolutely correct mate n if u wanna watch mahabharat with english subtitles it is available on torrentz. u can download it. BTW where r u from?
mit3inn 1 year ago
@mit3inn ahh thanks for letting me know mate, i'll definitely check it out..i am from Kenya, but my origins are Indian, Gujarat to be precise..i just never got the chance to learn hindi, but it is a part of my future plans...i appreciate the language and i'm sure i'll acquire it one day! how about yourself?
NickCheduoRebel 1 year ago
@NickCheduoRebel I am from Vadodara(baroda) off course in Gujarat.
my lang is gujarati. yeah u can learn hindi easily. is der nyone still speaking hindi or gujarati in ur family?if yes then it'll b very easy 4 u to learn.
mit3inn 1 year ago
venu gopaal mind your language u fuckin idiot
saurabh3134 1 year ago
what about that shraap,jo gandhari ne shri krishan ko dia tha?
reha449 1 year ago
All the talk about bias against Kauravs in Mahabharat is only by those who do not listen to the entire conversations, & have definitely not read the Epic. They are like the 6 blind men fighting over what the elephant looks like.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
mahabharat is very biased according to that whatever pandavas do is right and whatever kauravas do is wrong.
gochee99 1 year ago
@gochee99 very much true by modern day parameters, when the more evil you are, the more rights & respect they get.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@gochee99 actually, no. the mahabharata shows all its characters as imperfect human beings, even the "good guys". yudhisthira is an asshole for being addicted to gambling and staking his brothers and wife. drona's favouritism of arjuna to the point where he asks self-taught archer ekalavya to cut off his thumb is unconscionable. bhisma ruining amba's life for his vow. it's only this series that tries to justify whatever the "good guys" do and condemn whatever the "bad guys" do.
SatyaVenugopal 1 year ago
@SatyaVenugopal if u have brain use it n if u dont have one jus shut up. naach na jane aangan tedha.
mit3inn 1 year ago
23:17
mahadev bhi yahi karte hain...aur unke vardaano ko sambhalne ke liya kya kya karna padta hai ye koi nahi jaanta.......CLASSIC
sjuyal85 1 year ago
karna lost war but heroically,duryodhan's lost seems more pathtic.
8w3m 2 years ago
why does duryodhan call bhim nimuche?
madmax797 2 years ago 3
@madmax797 because bhim doesnt have mooch (moustache) :)
surjit2004 1 year ago
Comment removed
sip7654 1 year ago
Shri Krishna's argument with Balramji in favor of Bheem is laudable... Mahaveer, divine Bheem definitely deserves to break kapati duryodhan's thigh..om
sanaatan178 2 years ago 2
tudhisthir was really really a nalayak... jo muh main aaya bol gaya..... tatta...... without knowing anything..... jis marzi se yudh kar lo duryodhan... hathiyar bhi tum hi chuno paridwandi bhi..... iti sharafat insan main nahi murk main hoti hai..... agar Shri krishan na hote to pandav kabhi nahi jeet sakte the chahe wo sache hi kyu na the.. jitne ke liye takat ke saath - saath dimag ki bhi zarurat hoti hai jo kam se kam yudhisthir ke paas to bilkul nahi tha.....
thakur1006 2 years ago
jeetne ke liye taakat ke saath dimag ki hi nahi ek aur cheez ki zarurat hoti hai....bhagwan ka ashirwad
iska sirf ye matlab hai ke agar aap sahi kaam karo aur fair kaam karo to bhagwan aapke saath honge aur kisi bhi haalat mein aapki jeet nishchit karenge
chandlerhbk08 2 years ago
dude thakur....why do u misundestand yudhirstir there? he did absolutely the same thing what a kshatriya should do..he also knows that none other than bhim can face duryodhan among them..but still he dont want to do injustice..so he told duryodhan to choose one among them and fight.....if he had been a bad guy, he would have asked duryodhan to fight bhim at first talk itself....none of the people in the world were great dharmatma(exclude krishna bhagavan) than yudhistir in dwaparyug
vkli07 2 years ago
@thakur1006 .. tatta .. haha . i like that .. yudhisthir .. was a dumass .. he got all 5 in trouble coz of that dice game
leobindaas 1 year ago
What I would like to know is what is the effect or the parinam of the shraap that Yudhishthir gives to all of womankind?
darrinthebold 2 years ago
dude that's so obvious!! ever seen any woman keep a secret? I guess not.... the effect is that women chatter a lot and can't keep any thing to themselves :)
zboy123 2 years ago
good one. but ur probably right.
darrinthebold 2 years ago
that no woman will be able to keep a secret for long.
Which is why they leak out gossip so much
s0ulfire 2 years ago
duryodhana and company killed abhimanyu when he was not on his chariot and armless? was that accd to kshatriya dharma??? is insulting a woman accd to sharma???then how the hell was he the only person honoured in heaven???
sreemoyee21 2 years ago
Aho majle bhaia aho
sanandreas11111 2 years ago
Bhishma & Vidur are born in earth only due to their crimes in previous births. While Bhishma was cursed by Sage Vasishta for stealing his cow Nandhini, Vidura, who was dharmadevatha, passed a wrong judgment on Sage aani mandavya who cursed him to be born in earth.
Kambathilayanar 2 years ago
HAHAHHA
he calls bhim NI-MUCHA [no moustache ]
Akshayphadke 2 years ago 2
There's an incident that interested me related to this. When Dhuryodhan is dying he tells Krishna about how he dies a brave warrior, while how Pandavas live with so many deceits. After this celestials start pouring flowers on him!!!! Krishna appeared for the welfare of dharma and the celestials. When they are praising His enemy, and even though He had the capability of instantly slaying the celestials, He does nothing!!..like the one who is truly unaffected by defamy.
GokulWasi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am very disappointed the way Pandav fought with Kaurav.I hate all pandavs.Shame on them.
sunset11111 2 years ago
why?
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
duryudhan has a point. he was a son of king. period. elder son of king is price to be king.
think for a moment, what you would do, if you are duryudhan.
sumancalif 2 years ago
@sumancalif allow not only yudhisthir but nyone who is better than me in handling the kingdom n help n learn from him as much as i can.
mit3inn 1 year ago
Megnath vs Arjun (no dharma adharma effect) I think meghnath will win.
sitadriver 2 years ago
where does Megnath come in mahabharat
hcpspilakarb 2 years ago 3
@hcpspilakarb i know right
computerhelper303 1 year ago
dude
Meghnath was BEST ARCHER IN HISTORY BETTER THAN BEST.
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
YES ,
But correction he was Meghnad,Roar of Clouds & Thunder !!!
sitadriver 2 years ago
yup nad srry 4 typo
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
ram and laxman were better besides brahmastra was possessed by both karna and arjun too meghnath was good following his fathers orders but he was evil
neeshu30 2 years ago
Meghnad lived thousands of years before Mahabharat, why are you comparing him to Arjun? It's like cmparing Apples to Oranges. You can't decide which one is better because both are different
emperor0989 2 years ago
@emperor0989
lol dont compare apple and oranges..it is like comparing a pig(meghnad) to a Horse(arjun)
ssvenks 2 years ago
I respectfully disagree. his other name was Indrajeet,who won over Lord Indra, the finest warrior in the skies. Meghnad knew that Lord Ram and Prince Laxman were not mere humans, but he stuck to his father's side and fought Laxman to death.Laxman had to go to the cave and kill him before he could complete his yagya, otherwise it would have been impossible to defeat him.
a clip of Indra:
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=Z_qsB7Bix8E
Ravan- Meghnad conversation:
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=cwU6ELakbDE
emperor0989 2 years ago
I know that his other name was indrajeet..but he was a bloody demon who supported his father. Lets see you encourage someone kidnapping your wife..He's such an insult both him and his father whom he supported..you think this is human? he fought laxman to death? for your kind information he hid and shot laxman using maya..which again he did not fight fair enough..Laxman (avatar of sheshnag) and Ram(avatar of Vishnu) were born as humans in ram avatar not with their powers unlike krishna avatar
ssvenks 2 years ago
May be you my friend will have the capacity to support adharma and watch it grow immortal but one way or the other adharma has to be killed. So whats your point basically..You supporting Indrajeet as a warrior?? Hes a bloody coward who brought another women in guise of sita and killed her to mentally attack Ram it was during that time he attacked Laxman while he was helping ram to revive from that shock.. Hes a bloody idiot who supports his dad who robs wives...and you stand beside him..go ahead
ssvenks 2 years ago
And just because he's won over Indra..it doesn't mean hes the king of the world..Indra was created by paramathma, Indra Apart from having his good character goes in disguise of other people to enjoy their wives(Story of Ahalya who ram revived), knows luxury. dance, drinking, has way better Ego than any asura(Krishna avatar mount govardhan Story)...From Hiranyaksha to hiranyakasibhu to ravan to Kamsa..he was always pulped to dust and it was Vishnu who came in nick of time defeating the asuras.
ssvenks 2 years ago
I agree Meghnad was skilled warrior at using maya..but supporting his father's idioticity was the biggest mistake he ever did..tell me would ravan stay back if someone kidnapped mandodhari..may b e he would who knows. all asuras have a good part i agree but it is their adharma that puts them towards the bad side. One should be like Vibheeshan, even though he betrayed his kingdom he stood by dharma that makes him perfect. If i meghnad i would advice my father rather than supporting him..
ssvenks 2 years ago
Meghnad did not support his father's idiocy, he infact went to him after fighting laxmanji and confided To Ravan that Shri Ram is Indeed Lord Narayana and that he should make peace asap.
But this warning fell on deaf ears and Ravan questioned Meghnad's bravery and called him a coward. It was at this instance that Meghnad agreed to fight Shri Ram because his father wished him to do so even though he knew he would die, he would not betray his fathers word as per his warrior code.
s0ulfire 2 years ago
" whats that you say?? you mean to say what laxman's act was cowardly...Don't you know Vishnu's words. He says to Kill adharma there is nothing wrong in bending the rules of dharma behind which adharma is hiding. Indrajeet had to perform the Nikumbala Devi yagya by which he grew immortal, everyone knows ramayan. My friend you may help a thousand poor people but killing a rat makes all the good that you got go to biter waste. Though ravan was best shiva bhaktha kidnapping sita ruined hischaracter
ssvenks 2 years ago
duryodhan was great gada yodha!!
vivdixit 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
can someone please explain, why they projected the birth of this baby (Uttara's son Parikishita) -episode 92 as such a big deal as if the Pandava generation would end,; because any of the pandavas could have re-married and had more kids>>>.wouldnt be as simple as that?? please explain..
carolinaindian 2 years ago
What was Duryodhan then who was trying to kill the pandavas from day 1. You are offcourse entitled to your opinion but I must say that the moral of the story has eluded you.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just forv this i hate pandavas.i wud had shot bheem with my shotgun
TIgeracademy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1-Copy and Paste this message to 8 other videos
2-Go to your channel and look at you background
jazmynokerstrom 2 years ago
Is this the last episode of Mahabharat !? Please respond !
icaryan 2 years ago
No. There are two more episodes. Please search for them.
zulesrayas 2 years ago
the whole time talking part - i hate.. just get on with the serial.. instead have to listen to that
madmax797 3 years ago
Duryodhana was the best mace fighter during MBH era.
kuldeepbabbar 3 years ago
Only next to Balaram...
esrujan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why does not this is again shown on TV? Why is that stupid sas-bahu serials of Ekta Kappor is being shown which is meaningless to our lives? Those serial has actually resulted in extra- marital affairs. Those serials should be stopped instead such serials like Mahabharat and Ramayan should be telecasted
oline123456789 3 years ago 5
After learing all the comments done prior to me, I am shocked that there are such a uncivilised persons in our society and our world. At first, Everyone should respect all the epic of all religion, whether it is MAHABHARAT or KURAN or BIBLE. If one can not respect others religion, he has no right to make such a heinous comments on other's religion. Secondly, If any one make abuse on other's religion, there is no need to reply to him on the way of that particular person.
yadavmunna 3 years ago 7
i agree,,,,,,
00singhisking00 3 years ago 3
agree friend
tusharvpatel 3 years ago
@yadavmunna well I find no reason to respect your religion. and i can make any heinous comments on any religion i want. it is called freedom of speech. if you dont like them, dont read them. but you have no right to determine what my rights are.
zamriash 1 year ago
@zamriash yes you can make any heinous comment on any religion but just from behind your computer, like a coward exercising your freedom of speech. Certainly we cannot determine others' right, but others do not have any right to free verbal abuse. Right to speech does not mean right to abuse. For you it means yes because you were certainly born and brought up among a disrespectful environment where hate speeches were taught!
MrSatrajitgupta 1 year ago
@MrSatrajitgupta which of my comments were you so offended by? and where did i abuse your religion? do you know what you are talking about? it is unfortunate that you are behind the keyboard of a computer yourself. if you were in front of me, i would have seen the embarrassment on your face as you tried to answer these questions. and what does my upbringing have to do with freedom of speech? are you trying to equate status with birth, as is the tradition in india?
zamriash 1 year ago
@zamriash ok then listen to me ur religion is the gratest religion there's no religion like urs there's nothing like ur religion.ok satisfied?
mit3inn 1 year ago
@zamriash n yeah i can also see it how great is ur religion from ur comments.happy?
mit3inn 1 year ago
why dau (BALRAM) always supported duryudhan .... he didnt told him anything when he did Chaal n kapat ,,,,,, why he always supported an ADHARMI ,, can any one reply .........
00singhisking00 3 years ago
duryodhan was his best student ... he learned mace warfare from him and he was the best mace fighter on earth as described by dau...
just like dronacharya supported arjun above karna and offcourse who can forget eklavya
pranayranga 3 years ago 2
but as they bhim was also his student ,,,,,, an he was also the best as they told him sarvsherstha gadhadhari ,,,,,,,, but arjun was the supporter of DHARAM ,,,,,,
00singhisking00 3 years ago
He did not support the war - took sanyasi or some piligrim yatra and did not fight with Duryodhan. Also, Duryodhan was a very good disciple and always took good care of Balram. He won the heart of Balrm through his good behaviour. Remember, he disliked Pandavas very much but liked Balram a lot. Also, history says that Duryodhan was a good king and was just to the people in his kingdom.
Although Duryodhan was adamant kid, but he never disobyed Balram and respected him a lot.
oline123456789 3 years ago
But Mr. Rohit20059 to know what is righteous and good these books can be really big help if u get the true essence of Gita.
Skyisunlimit 3 years ago
Sara 1511 !! its not proper to call names to the god(for billions hindu's)..if u dont know or dont care then its not needed to insult others idiol cz it may hurt many peoples feelings which u already can see by the reactions.
Skyisunlimit 3 years ago
I can't believe Duryodhan being such a great warrior didn't see the thigh attack coming, even though he didn't get the special protection on his legs he should have known that Bhim would attack him there, Bhim even told him he would prior to the fight. Duryodham and Karna should have been on Bhim and Arjun like super glue in beginning of the war, they waited too long and got beaten.
lamano06 3 years ago
sara,,keep keep your fucking comments to yourself...u Bitch...Fucking arshole..bastard!!
twins0945 3 years ago
and pandu was the king when he asked dhritarastra to look after the throne till then so in that case yudi becomes the king, because dhrit was never crowned as king he was just a pratinidhi of pandu
smartharry123 3 years ago
U have less knowledge, duryodhan maybe a great hero but he was not capable of being a king and whole hastinapur knew that. king bharat also crowned shantanu the king according to his abilities and didnt crown his son. so king bharat's parampara is whoever is capable of being a king should be crowned and not just because he is the son of the king. look at the earlier episodes u will come to know what i mean.
smartharry123 3 years ago 2
hi SARA 1511 i am ur wellwisher. i sure u must be a muslim and u need 2 cnslt psychiatrist. mind it little knwldg is a dngrs thing. u r free 2 exprs ur views bt dont show ur so called sanskar. by d way do u knw what sanskar is dont ask to ur father as he would be unable
saurabhkumar1982 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
:) can I ask ur farther?
sara1511 3 years ago
sure- but explain yourself
who & why are you
plz infrm me soon as i am dying
what about my guess my arrow got the target or not
saurabhkumar1982 3 years ago
forget sumthing
u r not so uncvlizd as much u expose.
glad 2 know you mind last wordings
& u ndnt 2 ask my father i can satsfy u
plz feel free i m a hlpful prsn
saurabhkumar1982 3 years ago
Attempt to murder on Bhim in childhood, attempt to murder on all the pandavs after that Udishthir was named Yvraaj, wanting to undress his sister in law in front of everyone, is this the meaning of Veer to you??
I am afraid to say that i think you haven t understand a word of this story!!!
Rikki420 3 years ago 2
so pakistanis katuas are here.
orca110011 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very true.....those pandu buggers are low cheaters...and dat vasudeva one sun of a bitch
sara1511 3 years ago
I don't think, you are the bitch.
sukhanandan 3 years ago
sara 511 or whatever, pity on you watching mahabharat and abusing also. people who have respect towards mahabharat should only watch it and not loosers like u
smartharry123 3 years ago
@sara1511 do u know who r u?jus go n find urself first then tell bout others?
mit3inn 1 year ago
this whole story tells tht dharma must be saved even with wrong tectics. this also shows the changing times from ramayana where lord rama didnt do anything wrong. a big contrast between lord rama and lord krishna. but mahabharat closer to we people as there is good and bad in all of us. kauravas had to repay for their wrong deeds. and i feel king dhritrashtra was the biggest culprit in the intire epic.
vishant81 3 years ago 8
Yes, I agree. Couldnt have said it better myself. Mahabharat is a more real story, since it shows good and bad in everyone. And I agree, Dhritarashtra was the real culprit who could have prevented the war.
montychandra 3 years ago 6
Lord Rama killed Bali without his (Bali's) knowledge. Lakshamana killed Meghnath when he was praying for additional siddhis. So, you see in Ramayana too, there was tactics used. The thing is Dharma should be protected at all costs.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago 3
laxman did not kill him while he was praying, he just disturbed thta puja and then they had a war..
johnsalman66 2 years ago
You are right, the point I was making is that Lakshmana didn't wait for Meghnath to finish his puja. He challenged him right then and there, forced Meghnath to bear arms and then killed him in a battle which was fought in the cave where he was conducting the puja.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
why should he wait.. he was just protecting dharma and for that even lord krishna says that one should take any steps to protect it.. well lord rama did not say that but he proved tht statement when he killed bali.. if that puja wud have been done then the outcome of the war wud have been totally opposite.. which wud be wrong. moreover it was war time and indrajeet was busy doing puja.. war had already started it was just one another day.. in between war such things are not acceptable
johnsalman66 2 years ago
You are essentially making the same point that I stated two posts ago: "Dharma should be protected at all costs even though it may mean breaking a few rules of engagement". I don't see the contradiction.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
i think you are right. it is just thta your way and my way of saying is different
johnsalman66 2 years ago
When you break a few rules of engagement, wouldn't that be called Adharma?
gsaogb 2 years ago
Yep, Krishna is ready to let Yudi and Co. bear the sin of doing some wrong deeds so that Dharma for the whole people be protected.
Also, Yudister was infact ready to lie and carry the burden of a sin so that the people of Hastinapur can live happily later on in Dharmic rule... Infact, Pandavas are ready to bear the burden by breaking the rules so that dharma in a large scale is protected.
That is the beauty.....of Mahabharat.
esrujan 2 years ago 9
this kind of 100% utilitarian dharma is very dangerous. basically, it says the end justifies the means. this is the same kind of logic that pres. bush used to justify torture and detention without trial (in the name of the greater good of stopping terrorism so that fewer people in the world will suffer from terrorism).
SatyaVenugopal 2 years ago 2
Good point @SatyaVenugopal:
Lot of caution must be observed in following this kind of utilitarian Dharma. It is very possible that people can make a mess of things and then try to defend it by the same concept. Your example is also perfect.
Having said this, we shall not discard this completely either but have it as a backup tool that may be very very useful sometimes. My post above is to bring this concept up when someone probably did not understand the same and raised a question.
esrujan 2 years ago 2
@SatyaVenugopal Bush did it by pretending to do it for the greater good, as is preached by christianity (the pretence, & deception I mean). He is the impersonification of Duryodhan, who cannot look beyond himself. Pandavas, on the other hand, had tried very hard to avoid the war. And this was reiterated even by Karn, who refused to accept Indraprasth, for he would feel obliged to give it to D, who was most undeserving of it, & Indraprasth deserved better
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@aparaajita10 you missed my point entirely. i didn't say pandavas = bush. i said krishna's 100% utilitarian dharma is dangerous if taken to extremes, because then it can be used to justify anything. esrujan hit the nail on the head when s/he said a lot of caution must be used when applying this logic.
and why the unnecessary attack on christianity? the bible doesn't preach deception, even if many of its followers disregard the bible's call for truth and end up deceiving people into conversion.
SatyaVenugopal 1 year ago
@SatyaVenugopal The attack on christianity was absolutely necessary, for it got u saying that it is not the bible, but some of the people doing that, i,e. it is a social problem not a religious one. But Hindu Dharm is never given that concession. The abuse of the varna (wrongly labeled caste) system, that was a true division of labor & allocation of responsibility has been tagged on to the religion & that is what the christians are using to re-enslave Hindus.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@SatyaVenugopal and u yourself have countered your statement...Krishn keeps trying to press for peace even during the war...& you seem to totally ignore each time he tells each of the Pandavas, incl. Draupadi, that the peace & life of the people fighting is far more important than their revenge. So which part of Krishn's advice is dangerous? The excuse u've given is the favorite excuse of the perpetrators. Give a long hard look to all the history & u will know what I am saying.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@SatyaVenugopal One more glaring difference between the bushman & Yudhishther, Yudhishthir & Padavas are never proud & crying from rooftops about the greatness of the destruction they have caused. Yudhishther & pandavas are always sad & upset about what they have to do. But then, today, it is only, "chor uchakkey chaudhary...te lunji rann pardhaan"
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@esrujan i think you use the words "in fact" too often here. let me remind you that the mahabharat is not fact. it is mythology. it would be more suited to use words like "according to what I read", or "according to one version of the story" rather than "in fact". and for you information, people "live happily later" is only a story book concept. A little bit of history reading will let you know that there is no such thing. so udhistir told a lie because he wanted to win the war. thats all.
zamriash 1 year ago
@zamriash and even more, Mahabharat is an epic where the Lord comes in the earth to aid a family who were abused (mostly verbally), whose women were abused by immensely powerful people who thought that act to be their freedom of speech ..lol! So if you abuse somebody who has done nothing to you, or any religion which is followed by millions of human beings, then be sure you will be paid back very badly.
MrSatrajitgupta 1 year ago
@MrSatrajitgupta mahabharat is the longest poem in the world. thats all. like most other poems and stories, it has a moral, or a social or political aspect that it tries to express through its verses. if you think that it is an actual story of some god from heaven coming to earth, just to save a family, u are deluded. and why do u keep saying that i am abusive? can u please point out the text in which i have been abusive to u or ur religion? it may be followed by millions, does not make it true.
zamriash 1 year ago
@zamriash I did not intend to offend you. Only I read your remark in reply of yadavmunna where you commented "well I find no reason to respect your religion. and i can make any heinous comments on any religion i want. it is called freedom of speech. if you dont like them, dont read them. but you have no right to determine what my rights are"--- I disagreed with you on this comment and felt I should express my views on it as to me love and respect are mandatory for creating healthy society.
MrSatrajitgupta 1 year ago
@MrSatrajitgupta why do you disagree with me? if you are a hindu, do you respect islam or christianity as much as hunduism? if you oppose my right of freedom of speech to say that i dont respect hinduism, at the same time, you take away your own right to say that you dont respect islam or christianity or any of the thousands of other religion in the world. why do you want to give up this right of yours? it is a very valuable right as without it, society cannot progress or be healthy.
zamriash 1 year ago