The story must have come from somewhere. It has such detail, from Gweniver and Lancealot, to Merlin and Morgana , and even Uther, and sword that had its own name. The details had to come from somewhere. No one person could have conjuered a story like that in those days. I wonder how this tale got started, and who was the first to tell it.
@spartan300n1 yeah you're right. no one could have come up with tales of wizards and divine-like heroes, godesess of beauty and 1-men armies back in the dark ages, they MUST be true. No one would have the imagination to make that up.
That's the logic I apply when arguing with my friends about the existence of unicorns, Jesus and dragons. Literally no one could come up with something as crazy as men walking on water and horses with horns, so it HAS to be true!!!
Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
I think the King Arthur story is a lot like the King David story. They probably existed, but they weren't the kind of magnificent kings that their legends claim. Their kingships are modeled after the kingships of the time the legends were written down. David and Solomon were modeled after the Assyrian kings of the 8th century BC, Arthur modeled after the British kings of the 12th century AD. They supposedly ruled during a golden age but they actually ruled during a DARK age, chaotic and anarchic
King Arthur was chieftain of the Dumnonii tribe that dated back way before the romans, and he fought the romans and saxons. King arthur was probably the greatish brythonic warrior ever but he never could unite all the barbarian tribes of britain he only united his own (Dumnonii) and the silures, demetia, some of his nieboring tribes, and the Bretons against the romans and later the saxons. I know this because my surname was the chieftain surname of the Dumnonii tribe.
One movie I watched was based on archeological findings of the real King Arthur. There was no Camelot, Guenevere and Merlin were both native British, Lancelot and Galahad were Sarmatian cavalry, and the real Round Table was on the boarder between England and Scotland. Merlin was only a stage magician, although his tricks were really good. Arthur was thought of as a heretic because he disagreed what was commonly believed at the time. All of the fights were pretty brutal.
isn't it possible that Arthur wasn't really one man but really a culmination of the multiple individuals that led and helped the people. Maybe he was all thee of those candidates who where later remembered as one man.
@Piedpipper17 One thing is for sure: No man who was excatly like King Arthur in the legends, ever existed. However, someone (or several leaders) probably existed who gave the source of the legend. But as you write: it was probably not ONE single person, but several.
cont... amphetamine effects, very strong amphetamine effects (beyond anything discovered by modern science). The result would be Arthur acting with super-human swiftness while his enemies appeared to be almost motionless to him.
the documents written at the time closest to the time of the events claim he killed 960 men in a single battle. He killed them personally not his men. If he killed one man per minute this would have been a 17 hour battle. Keep in mind that there was magic in these times (events that we may term quantum or extra-dimensional, perhaps extra-terrestrial in nature). At the very least Merlin/ alchemists/druids could provide drug like potions that would create magic like effects and perhaps ...cont
that one poor sum bitch is so fuggin ugly he could passed for madoosa(i know it's not spelt rite) but god love him..its a face only a mother could love lol..dumville or whatever...gah
My favorite story of a legendary King. And Merlin was the greatest Sorcerer ever!
midoribishi 2 weeks ago
SABER!!!
Bajedu 1 month ago
nothing like retarded english history documentaries
IMBACHABRI 1 month ago
Garn Boduan - Nefyn
Jeffro307 1 month ago
I used to fight a lot like Arthur, until I took an arrow to the knee...
TheChillyWinterz 2 months ago
The story must have come from somewhere. It has such detail, from Gweniver and Lancealot, to Merlin and Morgana , and even Uther, and sword that had its own name. The details had to come from somewhere. No one person could have conjuered a story like that in those days. I wonder how this tale got started, and who was the first to tell it.
spartan300n1 2 months ago
@spartan300n1 yeah you're right. no one could have come up with tales of wizards and divine-like heroes, godesess of beauty and 1-men armies back in the dark ages, they MUST be true. No one would have the imagination to make that up.
That's the logic I apply when arguing with my friends about the existence of unicorns, Jesus and dragons. Literally no one could come up with something as crazy as men walking on water and horses with horns, so it HAS to be true!!!
Kougeki1000 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
downyourtube 2 months ago
I'm sure King Arthur is based somewhat on reality
Andrew19ao 3 months ago
Alan Wilson and youtu.
kope1100 3 months ago
hmmm, what a milf
siliyemoodislam 3 months ago
I think the King Arthur story is a lot like the King David story. They probably existed, but they weren't the kind of magnificent kings that their legends claim. Their kingships are modeled after the kingships of the time the legends were written down. David and Solomon were modeled after the Assyrian kings of the 8th century BC, Arthur modeled after the British kings of the 12th century AD. They supposedly ruled during a golden age but they actually ruled during a DARK age, chaotic and anarchic
KayBeeEee1983 4 months ago in playlist King Arthur
King Arthur was chieftain of the Dumnonii tribe that dated back way before the romans, and he fought the romans and saxons. King arthur was probably the greatish brythonic warrior ever but he never could unite all the barbarian tribes of britain he only united his own (Dumnonii) and the silures, demetia, some of his nieboring tribes, and the Bretons against the romans and later the saxons. I know this because my surname was the chieftain surname of the Dumnonii tribe.
Welshcornish 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Legends are real. The Castle is the Castle at Questenberg, Germany. There is where you will find King Arthur's Castle.
downyourtube 5 months ago
The Legends are real. The Castle is the Castle at Questenberg, Germany. There is where you will find King Arthur's Castle.
downyourtube 5 months ago
Hmm,I believe this legend,is so special:)
OficialRalucaxD 7 months ago
Wow, what a load of misinformation!
MIKOLBZ 8 months ago
Wow, what a load of misinformation!
MIKOLBZ 8 months ago
One movie I watched was based on archeological findings of the real King Arthur. There was no Camelot, Guenevere and Merlin were both native British, Lancelot and Galahad were Sarmatian cavalry, and the real Round Table was on the boarder between England and Scotland. Merlin was only a stage magician, although his tricks were really good. Arthur was thought of as a heretic because he disagreed what was commonly believed at the time. All of the fights were pretty brutal.
SirGabriel2076 8 months ago
The Merlin legend for example, is also (probably) a result of several druids or spiritual leaders during the dark ages,
bjornsdottir 8 months ago
"a 5th century blond bombshell" LOL
MYkelloGs 10 months ago 11
isn't it possible that Arthur wasn't really one man but really a culmination of the multiple individuals that led and helped the people. Maybe he was all thee of those candidates who where later remembered as one man.
Piedpipper17 11 months ago
@Piedpipper17 One thing is for sure: No man who was excatly like King Arthur in the legends, ever existed. However, someone (or several leaders) probably existed who gave the source of the legend. But as you write: it was probably not ONE single person, but several.
bjornsdottir 8 months ago
he is like king david. God established him to bring stability to a land in chaos. same with joan of arc, mary mother of jesus and others
iorixs 1 year ago
@iorixs i like kitties
Doom3695 5 months ago
@Doom3695 well they dnt like you
alfieg1 3 months ago
cont... amphetamine effects, very strong amphetamine effects (beyond anything discovered by modern science). The result would be Arthur acting with super-human swiftness while his enemies appeared to be almost motionless to him.
ss11s 1 year ago
the documents written at the time closest to the time of the events claim he killed 960 men in a single battle. He killed them personally not his men. If he killed one man per minute this would have been a 17 hour battle. Keep in mind that there was magic in these times (events that we may term quantum or extra-dimensional, perhaps extra-terrestrial in nature). At the very least Merlin/ alchemists/druids could provide drug like potions that would create magic like effects and perhaps ...cont
ss11s 1 year ago
that one poor sum bitch is so fuggin ugly he could passed for madoosa(i know it's not spelt rite) but god love him..its a face only a mother could love lol..dumville or whatever...gah
JustinCase10261 1 year ago
one of my favourite stories of all time
nikz200 1 year ago 17
@nikz200 likewise
manuknapatai 3 months ago