Mr president Obama, i believe the U.S. murdered lots of innocent Japanese people, so who was the first one to have nuclear weapons? and to live free from fear on the 21st century only in your dreams. Stop lying to people dude.
Do people just not understand? If we give each nation a nuclear weapon there is a very high possibility that one nation will break the rules. This will also probably cause a chain reaction that could do some devastating damage. Atleast Obama is making an effort to prevent nuclear war. Next time take into account the consequences your position can cause to the world. Also yes I understand the US has allot of nukes but they will disarm them if the rest of the world does too.
@aliciathefatpenguin exactly my point. it`s easy to say what he says while having so many nuclear weapons. obama is as retarded as george bush. fucking slaves are gonna destroy the world
The Monrol Doctrin says, the US will not interfear with another country as long as it doesnt change we as the peolpe of the US live, but if it effects us in any way we have to take action to help our nation, Obama is taking Action in what might be the most dangerus thing to the US, and wene i say "Action" im talking about a peacful one, Obama is trying to make peace with the world, Nukes dont solve anything but distroy our world, im only 13 but i should have a say in something also
i agree completely salvyy. Obama has no idea what it means to keep america defended. keep nukes out of the terrorists hands, but this treaty bullshit about not retaliating is a load of crap
@CTUFieldOffice DUDE.YOU dont have an idea of what it means to defend America. You cant stop the proliferation of these weapons but you can stop the use of these weapons and thats what Obama is really doing. This treaty is the best act possible. 1stly, any country who has not joined this treaty would be seen as a potential threat in the global community so nuclear-capable nations HAVE to join it with diplomatic justifications. 2ndly, no independant retaliation allows room for global retaliation.
The US is the only country able to protect the Western world in case of an attack from a disgusting power such as China, or Russia, or shit-ass little countries like Iran. The US is the only power able to defend democracy and freedom in this world and must ALWAYS be ready to bomb the shit out of any evil country that wants to attack the Western world.
The USA has demonstrated with FACTS that it will only use nuclear weapons to defeat the evil powers that want to threaten the free world. The US nuclear arsenal is fundamental to safeguard freedom and democracy in this world. There're so many evil nations that would try to conquer the world, if they had the opportunity and strength to do so. God bless America now and for ever.
History teaches us one thing or two. I don't trust the Chinese, I don't trust the Russians, I don't trust North Korea, I don' trust Iran, and I don't trust the radical muslim terrorists. If you trust them my friend, I suggest you start reading some history books. The US must always be ready to protect freedom and democracy and destroy any evil power who intends to threaten the Wester world. It's the ONLY country in the West still capable to do that with nuclear weapons.
@salvyy I am not saying I trust this guy or the other. What I'm saying is that we are not better than anybody. Nobody should be allowed to have or use nuclear power. What you said about those guys they probably think about us. I'm not causing controversy, I just want to make you think.Things may vary depending the country.
I would rather have that the US is the only country with Nukes, instead of all countries having nukes, the US is a civilised country (yes there might be inbread lol, but i'm talking about the president and the congress) They fought for Europe during WWII, and they will fight for the world now if it's needed, all countries should support them, because they don't want bad shit to happen..
No country SHOULD monopolize nuclear weapons in the world. C. Arguably, there's no such thing as an incorruptible state, so on the slight chance that the country monopolizing nuclear weaponry is corrupted no matter how small that contingency really is, we're talking about damages to sovereignty and power hierarchy. Even the global powers cannot do anything without nuclear weaponry. Refer to the TOT as well.
Unfortunately, when the US invades a country to liberate it, there're too many idiots in the world saying the US is evil. These ppl are so stupid. As for the nuclear weapons, once again, I prefer to be safe. I would never trust the Russians or the Chinese who, in case of an agreement, would claim not to have nuclear weapons anymore. I just don't trust them. I want the US to ALWAYS BE READY to defend itself and the entire free world in case of a confrontation with these horrible nations.
@laurensmalter Hello and thnx for your reaction. That's the exact same way USA wants you to think. USA isnt perfect or better than anyone else. They have been the ONLY country in history that dropped a nuke. Been like Bush or Cheney isn't civil, thats call MERCENARIES. They are good at protecting those with money. If there is money involved they protect anything.
I like what you just said, but honestly, think for 1 minute. You're asking for the whole world to disarm nuclear weapons when NK would still have them!
Secondly. Ever heard of the theory of terror(TOT)? The only thing stopping a nuclear war is another nuclear weapon. The prospect of nuclear proliferation is immensely frightening. And based on the TOT, the only thing encouraging a nuclear war is immunization from nuclear weapons which is what you implied from "mercenaries".
If i would be a US Soldier i would rather fight against a division of elite SS-soldiers, instead of having to check passports at a checkpoint in Iraq, Hitler's men had honour, yes they murdered so many, but they had honour, they knew it was wrong, terrorists don't know that it's wrong what they're doing, and that makes them so dangerous, they can nuke the entire western world and relax after it.. the US is the only country that can defend Freedom without nukes.
My friend, I agree with you 100% when you say that the US is the only country able to defend freedom in this world without nukes...but it's better that it has them, just in case. I don't agree with you when you say that nazi soldiers had "honour". I don't think this world has witnessed something as horrible and disgusting as nazism and its soldiers.
I get that you read history books, but the lesson that you CAN learn is that the US isn't all that interested in our freedom outside their country.
A. If they wanted to save lives from WWII, they would have dropped the bomb before having their ass kicked in pearl habour.B. If they cared for our freedom, they would stop the oppression in Myanmar instead of letting inefficient sanctions worsen the lives of the people with little effect if any to the military Junta. No country should
Hi. 1) The US applies the "democracy theory" which says that the world'd be in peace if all the countries were democracies. History tells us this theory works. The US cares that the world is free, otherwise they would have never opposed the Soviet Union during the Cold War, or attacked Milosevich's Serbia, for example. 2) WW2 was not a US war. Why did the US have to drop bombs before being attacked? 3) I wish the US would stop the oppression in Myanmar and everywhere else in the world.
@salvyy I disagree with your suggestion that WW2, the Cold War was not in the US intrests, but I understand your theory on humanatrian intervention, intresting
Has anyone else heard this before. Science and religion are agree that the world is coming to an end. Whoever is yet to watch the movie Left Behind, I would strongly recommend you too. Not only does it go hand in hand with bible prophecy, but it also describes the events that are occurring around the world today. Even down to Obama's speech regarding nuclear weapons, I am begging you all to wake up before its to late. The time is soon; the time is soon, God bless
mankind needs nuclear weapons just in case.. mutual guaranteed destruction has been the most succesfull element of world peace in the history of mankind.. developing countries understand, that acquiring nuclear weapons gives them long term independence, so they want to have them.. Obama is a dissapointment..
@ModelBuildingPLANES We did. The USA has been the only country (or Union) to use nuclear weapons on civilians. What can you say about that? Is that fair?
With the use of the Nuke on Hiroshima they stopped a war, probaly saved more lives by doing so, they made sure there wouldn't be a financial crisis in Japan and in the US, yes it was wrong, but Obama didn't throw the nuke.. He wants to make sure it doesn't happen again, so you are saying, the US used a nuke so Japan has the right to throw one on the US aswell? If terrorists use a nuke, i'm joining the Marines, because when that happens, it means the end of mankind..
@Obamaownswhitesnow The soviet union did a radiation/a-bomb test in 1954 on 45,000 people, so we're not the only nation to commit such horrible acts. I say there are problems in the past of every developing government. The US was just another case of atrocity. Any other nation would do the same if it meant gaining something. we gained a lot of valuable information in some respects (although I agree it is horrible).
Honestly, there will never be true nuclear prohifiliation until 100% of the world's population seeks true peace, which will never happen in not just our lifetimes, but anyone else's future lifetimes. Whether we'll actually use them though is hotly debatable.
in our world, even though we dont want it to be true,we will neer get rid of nuclear weaponry. As soon as the first one was invented there was no way we could have stopped this. If we do get rid of one, earth has the elements to build new ones. No matter what we want, there are people in this world that thrive on violence and destrucion. The day when everybody seeks peace is the day the nuclear weapons are truly destroyed.
To be honest I don't know anything about the government but I'm just going to state my OWN OPINION... I'm sure we, the U.S. are in the tip of the iceberg to get nuked by a nuclear bomb by ANY other country like Iran, or maybe even North Korea. It is my opinion, but I would not really know.
@PinoyGamers Russia's aren't very modernized. The US has a good nuclear defense, and most Russian bombs are old, and the delivery is mostly by planes.....
Maybe. There are secret hidden by the U,S, it self. What do you think the U.S. has in Area 51? And those Military areas in which you can get shot if trespassed? Maybe, nuclear weapons like new invented guns, or maybe even bombs. So yeah, I think it's true what you have obviously said.
i respect what you're saying man i respect that you have a dream of making the world to come to peace...but get with reality my friend, try telling the communists countries to come in peace all they'd do is get mad and try to bomb us...my point is we nuclear weapons because of how destructive they are. the world knows if we get into a nuclear war it's over that's why nobody does that! we need nuclear weapons for our safety obama is just tryna kill us i think he's a comme!
An eye for an eye will make the world blind. If they bombed us, it wouldn't do us any good of attacking them back, so it would be more beneficial to the human race to let them kill us than let them kill us while we kill them.
That's different. If someone aimed a gun to my head and I could prevent someone getting hurt, even him, I would. But if on a global scale when the other countries' nukes are already on their way to us, the best thing to do is just die and take it like men.
son i'ma police officer and i try to restrain from violence as much as possible but sometimes violence is the answer. if we didnt fight back we'd all ready be dead so why you sayin that? that is completely wrong
Oh c'mon Obama. Stop playing the pacifist, trying to rid the wolrd of nuclear weapons is like trying to rid the world of Global Warming, fruitless and a waste of everyone's time. You might as well be telling all the dictators of the world that you are weak and a pushover, if America is not willing to even defend itself.
Painfull as it is, I do believe not only the existance of nukes and other weapons of mass destruction, but also, eventually, the use of them is indeed unavoidable.
Even if all weapons are destroyed (but how can this be achieved?) the knowledge will persist to be used when the worlds powers go to war again.
Perhaps the thing to hope for is that all out nuclear war will not completely destroy mankind, but just throw it back into the "stone age", as some have predicted.
Barack Obama is right about one thing. The Fatalism of Humanity will be it's Fatal flaw. For the evolution within Humanity CANNOT happen, if humanity is unable to adjust to anything.
This Economic Crisis is forcing Humanity to adjust, and we're gonna find out soon if Humanity can step up to the plate.
My educated guess= Humanity won't step up to the plate or it'll go 0-3 strikeout.
man were dumb ass y are we debting wut to do were asking them to stop look they havent stoped lets get all the nations to fuck north korea up the ass wit the bigest war since world war 1 and world war 2 all im sayin is we better take action before sumthin bad happens
I don't understand how these people in prague react. Obama just sais "YES WE CAN" and suddenly everybody goes crazy, but theres very few applause when he speaks about the important stuff xDDD
Why is it so bad to reduce your nuclear firepower if you don't want to use it. And even IF you would want to use it you could still annihilate mankind more than once.
I want to keep on living in Europe a bit longer without being roasted even if some people might think we are assholes.
das hab ich nicht ernst gemeint ich hab doch nur spab! There are just to many Americans that go to europe and come back thinking they are better than everyone else, just because they drank wine for lunch in france or drank tea in England. Nuclear weapons are a serious threat to mankind and the thought of nuclear war is scary.
All benevolent actions in this world have been supported by clear wise Vision. Who can still insist today on keeping nuclear threat on everyone unchanged ? Do you believe Obama ignores the reactions to his words? Yet he has the courage and heart to asses Humane kind CAN go through the most difficult process of getting read of Nuclear threat. He makes it a priority, although he knows the forces opposing the idea. Thank Obama for helping humane consciousness to elevate. He shows real strength.
wow, let me guess your European....and let me guess where you're from people are big pussies who bow down to arabs and old cunt hanging british queens just like obama. I was giving my opinion, not going around commenting on other people because I have no life. You're 59 go ahead and hang yourself. Having leaders that didn't back down like Reagan,Kennedy,Gen. Patton etc. tis what kept the U.S.A a powerhouse. Shea Shea
Reagan, like Obama, wanted to ELIMINATE nuclear weapons.
Kennedy "backed down" after Oct 1962 by agreeing to remove missiles from Turkey in return for Krushchev removing missiles from Cuba.
My father served under Patton. Patton was a general and not a statesman.
cf. George C. Herring, FROM COLONY TO SUPERPOWER: US Foreign Relations from 1776 (Oxford, 2008). Diplomats ignore mama's boys like you who act tough from your inner weakness.
now your on eliminating nuclear weapons, my opinion was based on the fact that Obama is bowing to arabs and did nothing but talk about the north korean missle. Patton was a "leader" I never said he was in the house of representatives. Kennedy made a trade not backing down. Go makes some more stupid good baby videos and stop talking shit to everyone who doesn't have the same views as you. Sounds like you're the mama's spoiled little boy that got everything his way.
Obama has been in office how long? The fact is you're talking not about what he's doing (you don't read a daily newspaper in all probability) you're expressing the RACISM you feel when you see him on TeeVee. Even if you're black, which is unlikely but possible.
Can't stand it, can ya, that a "mama's boy", a law professor, a skinny black guy kicked the bully's ass. It ruined your TeeVee shows.
Yes you're right, i'm racist....you're such a fucking dork. It's o.k. i've recently traveled europe. Only I don't fall for their bullshit. Have you recently been brain washed by their so called hip and sophisticated way of life. What a push over...You're just an old hippie..who thinks if he pops L.S.D. he becomes enlightened. Go live your Movie "Chinese Box".
Yes, you're racist. In addition, you're stuck inside a mobile with the Memphis blues again: since you've not troubled to acquire any information outside self-referential Web pages disseminating conspiracy theories, you're in a Sixties bag wherein some people exited the soldier male compound, you didn't, and you're crazed with resentment in consequence.
What I'm talking about is that there's something very wong with a society in which 65 year old Vietnam vets are still raging about Jane Fonda, and you've inherited their inability to confront with sober senses the real conditions of your life.
Don't worry...no one will ever know that you've had a lobotomy if you if you wear a wig to hide the scars...You need to sit down and give your mind a rest.
Looks like you won the argument, you have successfully become an asshole like the europeans you were talking about. I bet your dad would have been proud.
President Obama- leading to coexistence or a new Chamberlin?
The call for good relations with Muslims is a good step
However,to succeed it has to be matched by Muslim leaders.
If Muslim leaders will implement in their countries:
Women equality,people Multicultural right and not only Islam,protect Human Rights,stop the Hate Teaching in some madreses and schools,stop funding some mosks preaching for Islam worldwide by force;
This means absolutely nothing, Anyone with half a thought know this would never come to be. This is a just a new platform in order to further this administration's agenda. Instead of waving the pointed sticks of war and fear to sway the American public, there is now the bitter olive branch of peace and "moral responsibility." Let no one mistake that the motivation for this speech about a move for disarmament for a noble cause. Rules only apply to the honest, and those we fear are not honest.
China, India, Pakistan, Russia aren't going to give up their nukes because of what Obama says. His speeches on peace and love my go over well with the young clueless crowd, The the leaders of those countries with nukes aren't not going to buy it. Also, North Korea and Iran will laugh in the face of little barry's dreams of a world without nukes. Now lets all hold hands and sing kumbaya and save the polar bears.
If Japan would have never attacked Pearl Harbor, then Japn would have never been attacked. That's like saying I got into a fight with a guy that tried to attack me with a 2x4, but knocked him out and busted his nose because I had a set of brass knucks. The moral of the story is that if the person with the 2x4 didn't start the fight, he wouldn't have been knocked out with a broken nose. Kumbayaism aka pacifism doesn't work in the real world.
I guess while everyone disarms, N Korea & Iran will be the only ones with nukes. But don't worry, they will have to face the UN. Yeah, that'll work. This Pres sucks.
Do you realize that Japan surrendered because of the use of those bombs. So I guess it would have been acceptable if tens of thousands of more American lives were lost as long as America didn't drop the bomb on japan right?
America needs a commander-in-chief and not a "bring down our US national missile defense systems so that our enemies can attack us"-philosopher-in-chief. National sovereignty means nothing to him, he wants to create a one world government!
He's a philosopher and an incompetent president. And hes speeches are getting so ridiculously philosophical that they are causing somnolence! Philosopher-in-chief.
A World Without Nuclear Weapons Is Impossible Cuz We Will Allways Seek For The Ultimate Weapone And With Todays Generation It Really Will Be Impossible Cuz Now We Only Think About War And Don't Say It's Not True Cuz Whene We See War We Think About It As TV Show So...
I have to admit that Obama may be doing what he feels is best for the world. he wants to create one world government and unite all coutries so we can stand together. But at what cost? The U.S. will dissarm first?? That has me worried lets bring down our deffenses first so that others can attack us while we are unarmed. HMMMM doesn't sound so great. We shall see what the future holds.
Uh.. what is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons on a civilian populations?... The U.S!
"Rules must be binding, violations must be punished." So George Bush violating Geneva Conventions with the use of torture and pre-emptive war in Iraq & Afghanistan isn't reason enough to charge him with war crimes?
Obama said that North Korea "broke the rules by testing a rocket that COULD be used for long range missiles... The world must stand together to stop the spread of these weapons." How did North Korea break the rules if he is not certain if they did so by saying "could" and why is he then suggesting that he is certain that they broke the rules by suggesting that the world must "..stop the spread of these weapons"? And then he said that "Iran HAS YET to build a nuclear weapon." How does he know?
Oh yeah. A non-nuclear world. I just can't wait to get back to the safe-old days before nukes were around. Let's see now. Prior to nukes we had how many wars with how many dead? Two great World Wars and countless other brutal bloody wars among countless countries.
How many wars since nukes were invented? Well there have been a few...mostly brushfire wars, no world wars, etc.
It won't work anyway. Like making handguns illegal. Law abiding citizens will comply, but the rogues won't.
was there anyone translating for Czechs what was obama saying??? don't take me wrong, but when I was last time home with my hubby no many people were able to help him to get to police station in english when he got lost .....
....putztuecher ???trash ????comunist????
what a peace of s..t you writen here
we are democratic country for last generation !!!! ....
despises because of an idiot who posts a comment on youtube? thats pretty foolish on your part. criticise him/her not the entire nation. flawed logic dont you think?....
no need to defend yourself. that guys a moron! americans want your nations to succeed. we feel we have a responsibilty to see that new europe moves forward! we helped take down the wall-i hope we can now see all our brothers and sisters in eastern and central europe move forward and succeed!
why insult people in sucha sophomoric manner? the people of Praque came out in thousands in support of Obamas/Americas revamped approach to world security. why would u feel the need to insult them?we should try and build bridges not blow them up-u give westerners a bad name-assuming ur even a westerner
is he protected by bulletproof glass?
BassPlayerGuy123 1 week ago
Mr president Obama, i believe the U.S. murdered lots of innocent Japanese people, so who was the first one to have nuclear weapons? and to live free from fear on the 21st century only in your dreams. Stop lying to people dude.
NauticaSailor 3 months ago
Nuclear Nu-god of chaos, Clear, get it. Nu also equal 50. Nun=50 is the death card 13.
76hexum 4 months ago
Yes! Get rid of nuclear weapons! So i can further my plans.
fuck1929 5 months ago
Do people just not understand? If we give each nation a nuclear weapon there is a very high possibility that one nation will break the rules. This will also probably cause a chain reaction that could do some devastating damage. Atleast Obama is making an effort to prevent nuclear war. Next time take into account the consequences your position can cause to the world. Also yes I understand the US has allot of nukes but they will disarm them if the rest of the world does too.
LOLIOWNUNOOBS911 1 year ago 5
how about another suggestion:
let every single nation have at least one nuclear weapon and call it even
aliciathefatpenguin 1 year ago
@aliciathefatpenguin exactly my point. it`s easy to say what he says while having so many nuclear weapons. obama is as retarded as george bush. fucking slaves are gonna destroy the world
viagemixtlan 1 year ago
Well said
PsychoKenshin 1 year ago
Most humans abuse everything they get... like the Earth and the envirment and now weapons...
GAGE38ROBLOXROCKS 1 year ago
The Monrol Doctrin says, the US will not interfear with another country as long as it doesnt change we as the peolpe of the US live, but if it effects us in any way we have to take action to help our nation, Obama is taking Action in what might be the most dangerus thing to the US, and wene i say "Action" im talking about a peacful one, Obama is trying to make peace with the world, Nukes dont solve anything but distroy our world, im only 13 but i should have a say in something also
bobby76234 1 year ago
Comment removed
knight4republic 1 year ago
i agree completely salvyy. Obama has no idea what it means to keep america defended. keep nukes out of the terrorists hands, but this treaty bullshit about not retaliating is a load of crap
CTUFieldOffice 1 year ago
@CTUFieldOffice DUDE.YOU dont have an idea of what it means to defend America. You cant stop the proliferation of these weapons but you can stop the use of these weapons and thats what Obama is really doing. This treaty is the best act possible. 1stly, any country who has not joined this treaty would be seen as a potential threat in the global community so nuclear-capable nations HAVE to join it with diplomatic justifications. 2ndly, no independant retaliation allows room for global retaliation.
knight4republic 1 year ago
You can never stop black market trade of nuclear weapons nor the making of weapons
Dustpan95 1 year ago
The US is the only country able to protect the Western world in case of an attack from a disgusting power such as China, or Russia, or shit-ass little countries like Iran. The US is the only power able to defend democracy and freedom in this world and must ALWAYS be ready to bomb the shit out of any evil country that wants to attack the Western world.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy Who would save the World from the US????
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
The USA has demonstrated with FACTS that it will only use nuclear weapons to defeat the evil powers that want to threaten the free world. The US nuclear arsenal is fundamental to safeguard freedom and democracy in this world. There're so many evil nations that would try to conquer the world, if they had the opportunity and strength to do so. God bless America now and for ever.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy That's relative bcs they probably think the other way around about us. DOnt you think?
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
@salvyy Why you are so convinced you are right and they are wrong?
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
History teaches us one thing or two. I don't trust the Chinese, I don't trust the Russians, I don't trust North Korea, I don' trust Iran, and I don't trust the radical muslim terrorists. If you trust them my friend, I suggest you start reading some history books. The US must always be ready to protect freedom and democracy and destroy any evil power who intends to threaten the Wester world. It's the ONLY country in the West still capable to do that with nuclear weapons.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy I am not saying I trust this guy or the other. What I'm saying is that we are not better than anybody. Nobody should be allowed to have or use nuclear power. What you said about those guys they probably think about us. I'm not causing controversy, I just want to make you think.Things may vary depending the country.
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
@Obamaownswhitesnow
I would rather have that the US is the only country with Nukes, instead of all countries having nukes, the US is a civilised country (yes there might be inbread lol, but i'm talking about the president and the congress) They fought for Europe during WWII, and they will fight for the world now if it's needed, all countries should support them, because they don't want bad shit to happen..
laurensmalter 1 year ago
You are a very smart person and you are perfectly right.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy (continuing from bellow)
No country SHOULD monopolize nuclear weapons in the world. C. Arguably, there's no such thing as an incorruptible state, so on the slight chance that the country monopolizing nuclear weaponry is corrupted no matter how small that contingency really is, we're talking about damages to sovereignty and power hierarchy. Even the global powers cannot do anything without nuclear weaponry. Refer to the TOT as well.
PS, i'm not accusing your state of anything XD
knight4republic 1 year ago
Unfortunately, when the US invades a country to liberate it, there're too many idiots in the world saying the US is evil. These ppl are so stupid. As for the nuclear weapons, once again, I prefer to be safe. I would never trust the Russians or the Chinese who, in case of an agreement, would claim not to have nuclear weapons anymore. I just don't trust them. I want the US to ALWAYS BE READY to defend itself and the entire free world in case of a confrontation with these horrible nations.
salvyy 1 year ago
@laurensmalter Hello and thnx for your reaction. That's the exact same way USA wants you to think. USA isnt perfect or better than anyone else. They have been the ONLY country in history that dropped a nuke. Been like Bush or Cheney isn't civil, thats call MERCENARIES. They are good at protecting those with money. If there is money involved they protect anything.
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
@Obamaownswhitesnow
I like what you just said, but honestly, think for 1 minute. You're asking for the whole world to disarm nuclear weapons when NK would still have them!
Secondly. Ever heard of the theory of terror(TOT)? The only thing stopping a nuclear war is another nuclear weapon. The prospect of nuclear proliferation is immensely frightening. And based on the TOT, the only thing encouraging a nuclear war is immunization from nuclear weapons which is what you implied from "mercenaries".
knight4republic 1 year ago
@salvyy
If i would be a US Soldier i would rather fight against a division of elite SS-soldiers, instead of having to check passports at a checkpoint in Iraq, Hitler's men had honour, yes they murdered so many, but they had honour, they knew it was wrong, terrorists don't know that it's wrong what they're doing, and that makes them so dangerous, they can nuke the entire western world and relax after it.. the US is the only country that can defend Freedom without nukes.
laurensmalter 1 year ago
My friend, I agree with you 100% when you say that the US is the only country able to defend freedom in this world without nukes...but it's better that it has them, just in case. I don't agree with you when you say that nazi soldiers had "honour". I don't think this world has witnessed something as horrible and disgusting as nazism and its soldiers.
P.S. = God bless America now and for ever.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy
I get that you read history books, but the lesson that you CAN learn is that the US isn't all that interested in our freedom outside their country.
A. If they wanted to save lives from WWII, they would have dropped the bomb before having their ass kicked in pearl habour.B. If they cared for our freedom, they would stop the oppression in Myanmar instead of letting inefficient sanctions worsen the lives of the people with little effect if any to the military Junta. No country should
knight4republic 1 year ago
Hi. 1) The US applies the "democracy theory" which says that the world'd be in peace if all the countries were democracies. History tells us this theory works. The US cares that the world is free, otherwise they would have never opposed the Soviet Union during the Cold War, or attacked Milosevich's Serbia, for example. 2) WW2 was not a US war. Why did the US have to drop bombs before being attacked? 3) I wish the US would stop the oppression in Myanmar and everywhere else in the world.
salvyy 1 year ago
@salvyy I disagree with your suggestion that WW2, the Cold War was not in the US intrests, but I understand your theory on humanatrian intervention, intresting
johnfox3 1 year ago
Comment removed
knight4republic 1 year ago
Comment removed
knight4republic 1 year ago
USA 10.500 Armes
He is joking !!
davdi0032 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Has anyone else heard this before. Science and religion are agree that the world is coming to an end. Whoever is yet to watch the movie Left Behind, I would strongly recommend you too. Not only does it go hand in hand with bible prophecy, but it also describes the events that are occurring around the world today. Even down to Obama's speech regarding nuclear weapons, I am begging you all to wake up before its to late. The time is soon; the time is soon, God bless
lcmarco22 1 year ago
Comment removed
lcmarco22 1 year ago
mankind needs nuclear weapons just in case.. mutual guaranteed destruction has been the most succesfull element of world peace in the history of mankind.. developing countries understand, that acquiring nuclear weapons gives them long term independence, so they want to have them.. Obama is a dissapointment..
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Comment removed
tibchy144 1 year ago
Nobama lies yet AGAIN.
there isn't a single truth he spits from his lying mouth.
everything he spits out is just well spoken DOUBLE TALK.
Artfryne 1 year ago
2:14
alcu0002 2 years ago
0:44
alcu0002 2 years ago
3:47
alcu0002 2 years ago
Comment removed
alcu0002 2 years ago
0:11
alcu0002 2 years ago
This is too wishful thinking. its not going to happen and the world is going to kill its self. the only question is when.
thekingnoah 2 years ago
@thekingnoah Nobody is stupid enough to use nuclear weapons luckily.
ModelBuildingPLANES 1 year ago
@ModelBuildingPLANES We did. The USA has been the only country (or Union) to use nuclear weapons on civilians. What can you say about that? Is that fair?
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
@Obamaownswhitesnow
With the use of the Nuke on Hiroshima they stopped a war, probaly saved more lives by doing so, they made sure there wouldn't be a financial crisis in Japan and in the US, yes it was wrong, but Obama didn't throw the nuke.. He wants to make sure it doesn't happen again, so you are saying, the US used a nuke so Japan has the right to throw one on the US aswell? If terrorists use a nuke, i'm joining the Marines, because when that happens, it means the end of mankind..
laurensmalter 1 year ago
@Obamaownswhitesnow The soviet union did a radiation/a-bomb test in 1954 on 45,000 people, so we're not the only nation to commit such horrible acts. I say there are problems in the past of every developing government. The US was just another case of atrocity. Any other nation would do the same if it meant gaining something. we gained a lot of valuable information in some respects (although I agree it is horrible).
ModelBuildingPLANES 1 month ago
Honestly, there will never be true nuclear prohifiliation until 100% of the world's population seeks true peace, which will never happen in not just our lifetimes, but anyone else's future lifetimes. Whether we'll actually use them though is hotly debatable.
SmoothLegend 2 years ago
obama will bring peace to the world and we should all trust in him because he loves the world and will save it from destruction.
tiredoldcrow 2 years ago
Shut the hell up
dascientiss 2 years ago
in our world, even though we dont want it to be true,we will neer get rid of nuclear weaponry. As soon as the first one was invented there was no way we could have stopped this. If we do get rid of one, earth has the elements to build new ones. No matter what we want, there are people in this world that thrive on violence and destrucion. The day when everybody seeks peace is the day the nuclear weapons are truly destroyed.
stephan001 2 years ago
What if someone aims their nukes at us?? We would still die. Bombing them back will make it worse for all of us... So i hope no one does...
PinoyGamers 2 years ago
To be honest I don't know anything about the government but I'm just going to state my OWN OPINION... I'm sure we, the U.S. are in the tip of the iceberg to get nuked by a nuclear bomb by ANY other country like Iran, or maybe even North Korea. It is my opinion, but I would not really know.
EdOwnz 2 years ago
US and Russia have 95% of all nuclear weapons. You can see how it looks when either one of them denies anyone else to have them.
plainlake 2 years ago
Russia has more nuclear arms than US. Russia has 16,000. we have 9,000..
PinoyGamers 2 years ago
@PinoyGamers Russia's aren't very modernized. The US has a good nuclear defense, and most Russian bombs are old, and the delivery is mostly by planes.....
ModelBuildingPLANES 1 year ago
Maybe. There are secret hidden by the U,S, it self. What do you think the U.S. has in Area 51? And those Military areas in which you can get shot if trespassed? Maybe, nuclear weapons like new invented guns, or maybe even bombs. So yeah, I think it's true what you have obviously said.
EdOwnz 2 years ago
Honestly, i just watched this video to hear obama say nuclear proliferation.
lardtaziumwadmaster 2 years ago
Comment removed
jake51515 2 years ago
my friend, Mankind should be united in peace, we are one nation. Think it`s possible and fight peacefully for it. Alan from Argentina.
EspejojepsE 2 years ago
i respect what you're saying man i respect that you have a dream of making the world to come to peace...but get with reality my friend, try telling the communists countries to come in peace all they'd do is get mad and try to bomb us...my point is we nuclear weapons because of how destructive they are. the world knows if we get into a nuclear war it's over that's why nobody does that! we need nuclear weapons for our safety obama is just tryna kill us i think he's a comme!
jake51515 2 years ago
An eye for an eye will make the world blind. If they bombed us, it wouldn't do us any good of attacking them back, so it would be more beneficial to the human race to let them kill us than let them kill us while we kill them.
ariadarabi 2 years ago
Comment removed
jake51515 2 years ago
That's different. If someone aimed a gun to my head and I could prevent someone getting hurt, even him, I would. But if on a global scale when the other countries' nukes are already on their way to us, the best thing to do is just die and take it like men.
ariadarabi 2 years ago
Comment removed
jake51515 2 years ago
son i'ma police officer and i try to restrain from violence as much as possible but sometimes violence is the answer. if we didnt fight back we'd all ready be dead so why you sayin that? that is completely wrong
jake51515 2 years ago
@EspejojepsE I agree with you. Unfortunately the greed of Capitalism is very hard to stop.
Obamaownswhitesnow 1 year ago
Oh c'mon Obama. Stop playing the pacifist, trying to rid the wolrd of nuclear weapons is like trying to rid the world of Global Warming, fruitless and a waste of everyone's time. You might as well be telling all the dictators of the world that you are weak and a pushover, if America is not willing to even defend itself.
narutoyondaime14 2 years ago
Painfull as it is, I do believe not only the existance of nukes and other weapons of mass destruction, but also, eventually, the use of them is indeed unavoidable.
Even if all weapons are destroyed (but how can this be achieved?) the knowledge will persist to be used when the worlds powers go to war again.
Perhaps the thing to hope for is that all out nuclear war will not completely destroy mankind, but just throw it back into the "stone age", as some have predicted.
Erminiaz 2 years ago
Barack Obama is right about one thing. The Fatalism of Humanity will be it's Fatal flaw. For the evolution within Humanity CANNOT happen, if humanity is unable to adjust to anything.
This Economic Crisis is forcing Humanity to adjust, and we're gonna find out soon if Humanity can step up to the plate.
My educated guess= Humanity won't step up to the plate or it'll go 0-3 strikeout.
Superhero18 2 years ago
man were dumb ass y are we debting wut to do were asking them to stop look they havent stoped lets get all the nations to fuck north korea up the ass wit the bigest war since world war 1 and world war 2 all im sayin is we better take action before sumthin bad happens
darkking107 2 years ago
I don't understand how these people in prague react. Obama just sais "YES WE CAN" and suddenly everybody goes crazy, but theres very few applause when he speaks about the important stuff xDDD
Populism-Bonus!!! =P
But still I'm really glad Obama is US President.
KRYPTONPRIME 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't understand some of the guys here.
Why is it so bad to reduce your nuclear firepower if you don't want to use it. And even IF you would want to use it you could still annihilate mankind more than once.
I want to keep on living in Europe a bit longer without being roasted even if some people might think we are assholes.
KRYPTONPRIME 2 years ago 2
das hab ich nicht ernst gemeint ich hab doch nur spab! There are just to many Americans that go to europe and come back thinking they are better than everyone else, just because they drank wine for lunch in france or drank tea in England. Nuclear weapons are a serious threat to mankind and the thought of nuclear war is scary.
Houstone2ndward 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
KRYPTONPRIME 2 years ago
Do not be seduced by his words. Do your homework. Do research work. Investigate. Be informed.
ocampomaster 2 years ago
I'm American and I'm thrilled we finally have a leader willing to work toward reducing nuclear weapons. YES WE CAN!
montanacowgrrrl 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
All benevolent actions in this world have been supported by clear wise Vision. Who can still insist today on keeping nuclear threat on everyone unchanged ? Do you believe Obama ignores the reactions to his words? Yet he has the courage and heart to asses Humane kind CAN go through the most difficult process of getting read of Nuclear threat. He makes it a priority, although he knows the forces opposing the idea. Thank Obama for helping humane consciousness to elevate. He shows real strength.
jordanwoci 2 years ago
Comment removed
jordanwoci 2 years ago
obama is making the usa look weak, next thing you know everyone will start testing long range missles.
gangstanikes 2 years ago
No, Obama isn't making the US look weak.
Bad schools producing illiterates who can't write but post shit here make the US look weak.
The credit crisis makes America look weak.
Loudmouth chicken hawks who unlike Europeans know NOTHING of the effect of war on CHILDREN make America look weak.
Fat Americans stuffing their foolish faces at McDonald's make the US look weak.
Your big mouth makes America look weak.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
wow, let me guess your European....and let me guess where you're from people are big pussies who bow down to arabs and old cunt hanging british queens just like obama. I was giving my opinion, not going around commenting on other people because I have no life. You're 59 go ahead and hang yourself. Having leaders that didn't back down like Reagan,Kennedy,Gen. Patton etc. tis what kept the U.S.A a powerhouse. Shea Shea
gangstanikes 2 years ago
People like you make me embarrassed to be American.
montanacowgrrrl 2 years ago
yet you're o.k. with your obesity. Go run around the block and then scream YES I CAN LOSE Wieght.
Houstone2ndward 2 years ago
I'm an American.
Reagan, like Obama, wanted to ELIMINATE nuclear weapons.
Kennedy "backed down" after Oct 1962 by agreeing to remove missiles from Turkey in return for Krushchev removing missiles from Cuba.
My father served under Patton. Patton was a general and not a statesman.
cf. George C. Herring, FROM COLONY TO SUPERPOWER: US Foreign Relations from 1776 (Oxford, 2008). Diplomats ignore mama's boys like you who act tough from your inner weakness.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
now your on eliminating nuclear weapons, my opinion was based on the fact that Obama is bowing to arabs and did nothing but talk about the north korean missle. Patton was a "leader" I never said he was in the house of representatives. Kennedy made a trade not backing down. Go makes some more stupid good baby videos and stop talking shit to everyone who doesn't have the same views as you. Sounds like you're the mama's spoiled little boy that got everything his way.
gangstanikes 2 years ago
Obama has been in office how long? The fact is you're talking not about what he's doing (you don't read a daily newspaper in all probability) you're expressing the RACISM you feel when you see him on TeeVee. Even if you're black, which is unlikely but possible.
Can't stand it, can ya, that a "mama's boy", a law professor, a skinny black guy kicked the bully's ass. It ruined your TeeVee shows.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Yes you're right, i'm racist....you're such a fucking dork. It's o.k. i've recently traveled europe. Only I don't fall for their bullshit. Have you recently been brain washed by their so called hip and sophisticated way of life. What a push over...You're just an old hippie..who thinks if he pops L.S.D. he becomes enlightened. Go live your Movie "Chinese Box".
gangstanikes 2 years ago
Yes, you're racist. In addition, you're stuck inside a mobile with the Memphis blues again: since you've not troubled to acquire any information outside self-referential Web pages disseminating conspiracy theories, you're in a Sixties bag wherein some people exited the soldier male compound, you didn't, and you're crazed with resentment in consequence.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
What I'm talking about is that there's something very wong with a society in which 65 year old Vietnam vets are still raging about Jane Fonda, and you've inherited their inability to confront with sober senses the real conditions of your life.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Don't worry...no one will ever know that you've had a lobotomy if you if you wear a wig to hide the scars...You need to sit down and give your mind a rest.
Houstone2ndward 2 years ago
Looks like you won the argument, you have successfully become an asshole like the europeans you were talking about. I bet your dad would have been proud.
Houstone2ndward 2 years ago
Yes, yes if an asshole wins arguments, and yes.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
i got your back primo
Houstone2ndward 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
President Obama- leading to coexistence or a new Chamberlin?
The call for good relations with Muslims is a good step
However,to succeed it has to be matched by Muslim leaders.
If Muslim leaders will implement in their countries:
Women equality,people Multicultural right and not only Islam,protect Human Rights,stop the Hate Teaching in some madreses and schools,stop funding some mosks preaching for Islam worldwide by force;
Than Obama will succeed.
Otherwise he will be a new Chamberlin
MordechayAriely 2 years ago
This means absolutely nothing, Anyone with half a thought know this would never come to be. This is a just a new platform in order to further this administration's agenda. Instead of waving the pointed sticks of war and fear to sway the American public, there is now the bitter olive branch of peace and "moral responsibility." Let no one mistake that the motivation for this speech about a move for disarmament for a noble cause. Rules only apply to the honest, and those we fear are not honest.
bhahn1986 2 years ago
Yeah, you got it right. MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. You got a problem with it? Are you so full of shit that it means nothing?
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Palin is a pit bull and Obama has shown himself to be a cowardly mutt on the world's stage.
xpandergt 2 years ago
Comment removed
dubtubjo 2 years ago
well poop to you
xhalmers860 2 years ago
I love your opposing world view, where you desire fighting, and you crave violence.
I wonder how long humanity would last under your rule?
Genius.
falconxev 2 years ago
obama is a fucking idiot
soncalero 2 years ago
Canada is full of inbred idiots and your clearly one of them.
jaydee2811 2 years ago
China, India, Pakistan, Russia aren't going to give up their nukes because of what Obama says. His speeches on peace and love my go over well with the young clueless crowd, The the leaders of those countries with nukes aren't not going to buy it. Also, North Korea and Iran will laugh in the face of little barry's dreams of a world without nukes. Now lets all hold hands and sing kumbaya and save the polar bears.
xpandergt 2 years ago
If Japan would have never attacked Pearl Harbor, then Japn would have never been attacked. That's like saying I got into a fight with a guy that tried to attack me with a 2x4, but knocked him out and busted his nose because I had a set of brass knucks. The moral of the story is that if the person with the 2x4 didn't start the fight, he wouldn't have been knocked out with a broken nose. Kumbayaism aka pacifism doesn't work in the real world.
xpandergt 2 years ago
I guess while everyone disarms, N Korea & Iran will be the only ones with nukes. But don't worry, they will have to face the UN. Yeah, that'll work. This Pres sucks.
barklikeamonkey 2 years ago
You do realize America is the only one who used nuclear weapon to destroy civilians.
Aka Hiroshima-Nagasaki 1945?
So... nuclear weapon to defend ourself or nuclear weapon to attack other countries? Huh? Huh?
ElliottMan 2 years ago
Do you realize that Japan surrendered because of the use of those bombs. So I guess it would have been acceptable if tens of thousands of more American lives were lost as long as America didn't drop the bomb on japan right?
xpandergt 2 years ago
Yeah, but Japan never attacked US with nuclear weapon in the first place.
If the nuclear is on US' hand, everything is justifiable, but if it's on other countries, they are potential threats. Very hypocrite.
If US decided to attack a country it's for "preemptive strike". If a country attacks US it's an "invasion"
If US has the right to own nuclear weapons, so do other countries. You are what you preach.
"Oh noooo I don't want others to smoke cocaine but I want it all myself!!!"
ElliottMan 2 years ago
"Yeah, but Japan never attacked US with nuclear weapon in the first place."
Beucase they didn't have any. You think they wouldn't have used a-bomb?
Why are you hating your own country so much?
MokomaSusi 2 years ago
You think he still believes in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny? The idea of a world with no nuclear weapons is just as silly.
This is painfully embarassing. Have we ever had a more naive president?
conservefreedom98 2 years ago
This is tnothing more than he introductory speech to the upcoming North Korean invasion.
Sorlac2004 2 years ago
America needs a commander-in-chief and not a "bring down our US national missile defense systems so that our enemies can attack us"-philosopher-in-chief. National sovereignty means nothing to him, he wants to create a one world government!
FalseTalkExpress 2 years ago
He's a philosopher and an incompetent president. And hes speeches are getting so ridiculously philosophical that they are causing somnolence! Philosopher-in-chief.
FalseTalkExpress 2 years ago
A World Without Nuclear Weapons Is Impossible Cuz We Will Allways Seek For The Ultimate Weapone And With Todays Generation It Really Will Be Impossible Cuz Now We Only Think About War And Don't Say It's Not True Cuz Whene We See War We Think About It As TV Show So...
KuroiKami1 2 years ago
YES WE CAN STILL SAY:
first & only nukes dropped by US-planes on civilians,
unbelievable war crimes by contamination with cancer-causing depleted uranium munitions in Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan
cooptvberlin 2 years ago
I have to admit that Obama may be doing what he feels is best for the world. he wants to create one world government and unite all coutries so we can stand together. But at what cost? The U.S. will dissarm first?? That has me worried lets bring down our deffenses first so that others can attack us while we are unarmed. HMMMM doesn't sound so great. We shall see what the future holds.
Dab3ar19 2 years ago
Obama Doctrine = "Nuclear-Free World"
I am so hopeful for our world...everyone will want to live in peace now.
PragaSong 2 years ago
Uh.. what is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons on a civilian populations?... The U.S!
"Rules must be binding, violations must be punished." So George Bush violating Geneva Conventions with the use of torture and pre-emptive war in Iraq & Afghanistan isn't reason enough to charge him with war crimes?
Briannathegreat 2 years ago
Obama said that North Korea "broke the rules by testing a rocket that COULD be used for long range missiles... The world must stand together to stop the spread of these weapons." How did North Korea break the rules if he is not certain if they did so by saying "could" and why is he then suggesting that he is certain that they broke the rules by suggesting that the world must "..stop the spread of these weapons"? And then he said that "Iran HAS YET to build a nuclear weapon." How does he know?
FalseTalkExpress 2 years ago
Oh yeah. A non-nuclear world. I just can't wait to get back to the safe-old days before nukes were around. Let's see now. Prior to nukes we had how many wars with how many dead? Two great World Wars and countless other brutal bloody wars among countless countries.
How many wars since nukes were invented? Well there have been a few...mostly brushfire wars, no world wars, etc.
It won't work anyway. Like making handguns illegal. Law abiding citizens will comply, but the rogues won't.
JohnR22926 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YES, HE DOES ! ! !
sjel47 2 years ago
emotional.. something that heads of czech republic cant come up with... i can follow the footsteps of TGM:)
radoncz 2 years ago
was there anyone translating for Czechs what was obama saying??? don't take me wrong, but when I was last time home with my hubby no many people were able to help him to get to police station in english when he got lost .....
....putztuecher ???trash ????comunist????
what a peace of s..t you writen here
we are democratic country for last generation !!!! ....
koblizka 2 years ago
:-(
Proudstr1 2 years ago
clearly a well traveled individual putztrekker
fantasticini 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a bunch of east european communist trash
putztuecher 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and you wonder why the rest of the world despises america?
sfcgds 2 years ago
despises because of an idiot who posts a comment on youtube? thats pretty foolish on your part. criticise him/her not the entire nation. flawed logic dont you think?....
newjerseydev 2 years ago 3
Don't despise America, despise assholes from wherever
dullsvillain 2 years ago
Central, central Europe (Obama says :-) )
we are not communist trash. we arent Soviet Union. We are nation with long sad history.
Proudstr1 2 years ago
no need to defend yourself. that guys a moron! americans want your nations to succeed. we feel we have a responsibilty to see that new europe moves forward! we helped take down the wall-i hope we can now see all our brothers and sisters in eastern and central europe move forward and succeed!
newjerseydev 2 years ago 2
And you are selfish bastard which do not even know where Czech republic is, am I right? Go to Bureau of Labor, do a favor yourself and find a job.
fanoscech 2 years ago
why insult people in sucha sophomoric manner? the people of Praque came out in thousands in support of Obamas/Americas revamped approach to world security. why would u feel the need to insult them?we should try and build bridges not blow them up-u give westerners a bad name-assuming ur even a westerner
newjerseydev 2 years ago 3