did you know that some of the foo fighters early songs were supposed to be on the nirvana album and it would feature kurt on drum and dave on lead vocals and guitar but sadly kurt passed away. i love weezer and i love the foo foozer/ wee fighters doesnt matter they bith fucking rock
without nirvana, weezer wouldn't exsist, i think rivers was showing respect by opening for the drummer's band. The Foo Fighters are more successful I believe too. I've seen both at MSG in NYC on different occasions.
@RyanSTH94 I think Nirvana was on the verge of breaking up anyway, but they would have made their comeback around this time like the other grunge bands have been. But a Weezer opening for Foo Fighters opening for Nirvana is the concert I shall see in heaven.
foos & weezer are both awesome bands. there's no comparison between them because they play different music.. people who say one is better than the other are idiots!
@spacefarmboy whats funny is when weezer werent famous they used to do do covers of nirvana songs. (dave grohl was nirvanas drummer incase you didnt know)
no, weezer opened for foo fighters if you can remember. weezer is good, i saw them at MSG last september, but they dont have anything agaisnt the foo fighters. dave grohls just a brilliant song writer/frontman. i love weezer, but theres no way around it, foo fighters are the better band
@sharty5000 well ill give u that the foo fighters are better presently. weezer realllly sucks now, but back in the day when weezer was cool they were soooo much better then the foos
@sharty5000 Actually, trying from an objective point of view, Dave Grohl is a better frontman. But Rivers Cuomo is a better songwriter, especially after reading his excerpts from the Pinkerton Diaries. I think the Foos have remained consistently brilliant whilst gaining huge popularity throughout the years (with help from the Nirvana fanbase), thus more people will probably prefer Foos, although I think Weezer's first two albums just about peak any album the Foos have done.
undoubtably is undoubtedly not a word
SuperStray27 1 week ago
They are both the main attraction. That's why they were touring together.
Blaze1289 3 weeks ago
That concert is to die forrrr~
xlawlzyourfacex 3 weeks ago
"the wee figh'ers, ie!" LOL
negativewierdo 1 month ago
Weezer all the way!!!
Mefreudi 1 month ago
OMG!!!!!!!!!!
RichardDesj 2 months ago
i like em both the same :) i think im more into weezer
strokebomb101 2 months ago
Comment removed
Mefreudi 3 months ago
weezer is the main attraction? are you stupid?
valdivia562 3 months ago
did you know that some of the foo fighters early songs were supposed to be on the nirvana album and it would feature kurt on drum and dave on lead vocals and guitar but sadly kurt passed away. i love weezer and i love the foo foozer/ wee fighters doesnt matter they bith fucking rock
lightningrod912 3 months ago
without nirvana, weezer wouldn't exsist, i think rivers was showing respect by opening for the drummer's band. The Foo Fighters are more successful I believe too. I've seen both at MSG in NYC on different occasions.
Robiskool1234 4 months ago
@Robiskool1234 Without Nirvana, Foo Fighters wouldn't exist either! js
Btw Foo are my fav band but yeah, that's true tho!
RyanSTH94 4 months ago
@RyanSTH94 I think Nirvana was on the verge of breaking up anyway, but they would have made their comeback around this time like the other grunge bands have been. But a Weezer opening for Foo Fighters opening for Nirvana is the concert I shall see in heaven.
Robiskool1234 3 months ago
1:21
yeeeaaah, nirvana fan
eastcoastsalads 5 months ago 2
Weezer I mean lol
applejive43 5 months ago
Weeded is good but foo fighters have twice as many good sings and a much better stage presence... Besides it's DAVE GROHL....
applejive43 5 months ago
Foo Fighters are way better than weezer
07adavis 5 months ago 3
anyone know what kind of pedal that is at the very end?
mrshnarfles 5 months ago
Weezer (judging off their first 2 albums) are wayyyy better than the foos.
lickapotato 6 months ago
foo fighters can suck a dick
Mefreudi 6 months ago
foo fighters > weezer
FreakinKoolMedia 7 months ago
Wee Fighters!
Wish i was there!! ^^
Loveee Foo Fighters!!
& Love weezer to, but foo fighters is better. ^^
Fairytale30299 8 months ago
wee fighter ftw.
gabe600 8 months ago
i liked it better when rivers stood and looked at his shoes and sang
BigPapiKay 9 months ago
love both bands a ton but i will have to go with the foos as a better band!
thefoofighteraddict 9 months ago
I'd go for wee fighters. sounds Scottish.
koopakid182 10 months ago 2
Wee fighters is gay, Foozer.
777jackpot1 1 year ago
whats the song at 0:30??
1ninenine3 1 year ago
who actually headlined?
JoshBoyy1 1 year ago
The Foo Fighters are awesome but c'mon nothing beats Blue :)
allotheabove123 1 year ago
Wee fighters!
bigmuffexpress 1 year ago
I like Weezer a little better but it's close. I'm glad I had a chance to go to one of these shows.
badtown88 1 year ago
haha i loved dave grohls scottish accent
btw im scottish ;p
Sumbody8 1 year ago
foozer sounds better. but weezer has more likeable music, sorry.
Xavygravy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
foozer. no offence to anybody i just like foo fighters better. weezer is still aweome though
vivalafoofighters8 1 year ago
foozer. no offence to anybody i just like foo fighters better. weezer is still aweome thoug
vivalafoofighters8 1 year ago
Comment removed
lickapotato 1 year ago
Comment removed
lickapotato 1 year ago
Hi Alisha!!!!
beelzabubba 1 year ago
Whatever they're both awesome
bacara50 1 year ago
dude, i saw them in dallas on this tour in the front row... changed my life.
mahoney696 1 year ago
foos & weezer are both awesome bands. there's no comparison between them because they play different music.. people who say one is better than the other are idiots!
spacefarmboy 2 years ago 31
@spacefarmboy whats funny is when weezer werent famous they used to do do covers of nirvana songs. (dave grohl was nirvanas drummer incase you didnt know)
TwentySixthOfMay 1 year ago
i really wish they brought that to australia, ive seen fooies twice now but weezer not even once :(
pana619 2 years ago
Foo Fighters are a better band, but Weezer sings better live
Shappleify 2 years ago
foo fighters are better then weezer without a doubt
sharty5000 2 years ago
ya fuck you
weezer is wayy better than foo fighters
gomerA7X 2 years ago
no, weezer opened for foo fighters if you can remember. weezer is good, i saw them at MSG last september, but they dont have anything agaisnt the foo fighters. dave grohls just a brilliant song writer/frontman. i love weezer, but theres no way around it, foo fighters are the better band
sharty5000 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
lickapotato 1 year ago
@lickapotato nope, foo fighters are better. i love both bands but foo's win
sharty5000 1 year ago
@sharty5000 well ill give u that the foo fighters are better presently. weezer realllly sucks now, but back in the day when weezer was cool they were soooo much better then the foos
lickapotato 1 year ago
@sharty5000 Actually, trying from an objective point of view, Dave Grohl is a better frontman. But Rivers Cuomo is a better songwriter, especially after reading his excerpts from the Pinkerton Diaries. I think the Foos have remained consistently brilliant whilst gaining huge popularity throughout the years (with help from the Nirvana fanbase), thus more people will probably prefer Foos, although I think Weezer's first two albums just about peak any album the Foos have done.
Tomamo5 1 week ago
2005
sharty5000 2 years ago
wich year was that?
MrPeterGroove 2 years ago
Amazing tour!
davegrohllover 2 years ago