Stefan Molyneux: The Nature of Human Society on This Planet - Alex Jones Tv 3/4

[LooksAeterna]

Anyone who knows today's resource depletion and efficiency also knows how much surplus can be mustered for the destitute by the the extremely few individuals who WILL have productive work.

This social plan of yours is so ignorant and retro, it is beyond words. You can dream yourself into some Middle Earth Lala Land all you want, but it is just a sign of serious psychological regression or utter lack of education. Chances are you are a 7 day creationist too.

[LooksAeterna]

(contd) Sad thing is you do not realize that YOU are playing into the hands of the powers that be, because the destruction of the modern nation state is exactly what they want, and it is what your stance unwittingly also promotes. If you want to know the history of the modern nation state and what it entails (and that is a lot of [hopefully good] government !) you have to listen to Webster Tarpley (beware of his nuclear stance).

"The Myth of Male Power" Warren Farrell.

google it + "excerpts".

[BeachedWhale09]

address the fact that everyone was poor so how was everyone to be made comfortable. Also you did not mention any actions that you take to change things besides trolling youtube. I write articles for a local libertarian foundation, I attend the Libertarian Party meetings here, I am part of the county sheriff brigade that attempts to bring the constitutional role of the sheriff back (OMG I promote govt!), and I pass dvds out particularly on the corrupt Federal Reserve. I ask again, WHAT DO YOU DO?

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 Now please realize that for someone with some education, your ignorant hybris has disqualified you from serious dialogue long ago. That means, I am not evading a genuine and reasonable discussion. But your behavior has already demonstrated that you are incapable of such. Hence all my reactions will only be sarcastic retorts to your barbaric state of mind, in an attempt to make you realize that I do not consider you suitable.

Go back to years of studying world history first. Sit!

[flyermay]

WOW.... Alex Jones finally got the balls to show that he is all about; which is pretty much what everyone knew anyway:

"The welfare CLASS are the quisi-undead"

"… are self-propelled stomachs eating at McDonalds"

"… are the helpers of the parasites"

"Post WWII British people are a bunch of lazy dumb-dumb people who think it's their moral responsibility to be intellectually lazy"...

And this is the guy that's going to save you from the elitists??? :D

[UrSoMeanBoss]

@flyermay

being on welfare makes you HIGHLY RELIANT on the government. also a lot of people on welfare are abusing the system. let it be drug addicts or otherwise.

if the government is the source of your ability to survive, and you depend on it to much, you are easily controlled by that. i think you took this out of context. ive seen this on some of his more-recent videos. (not what you think)

>not all people on welfare are abusing the system -dont twist my words-

[flyermay]

@UrSoMeanBoss have you considered that most of those on the welfare are either: because the current situation has forced them to (in which case; these are the people that AJ should be fighting for), or if they do it on purpose it is because they don't want to cooperate with this criminal government (in which case; these are also the people that AJ should be fighting for).

[UrSoMeanBoss]

@flyermay once again NOT ALL PEOPLE

but a majority [~64%] (which is the unfortunet truth)

once again, im not saying everyone on welfare is what AJ was talking about

which is my original case.

[hagbard72]

Here in Canada, as Stephan should know, the CRTC has granted the monopoly internet providers the right to meter the web and charge outrageous fees for usage. This is one way the "elites" are going to control the Prolies access to the web by pricing it out of their hands.

[ahamatmabrahman]

The pyramid system -: When those at the top look down all they can see is shit When those at the bottom look up all they can see is ass holes.

[dubbywatersss]

8:34, I can't believe I'm talking shit because I've been following for about 6 years, but, It seems like we always reference the caveman "syndromes" and duly note the fact that there's been a lot of different efforts to destroy those instinctual survival traits. ie the water oh well, i'm just cherry picking

[meberic]

Now I get why super hot women would even look at me... they are just intimidated by even better looks... oooof that's a relief, I was starting to believe I was uggly.

[SaharaDeer]

"We were all bonnie once "

-Samuel Beckett--

[SaharaDeer]

welfare class? Who is that? What that be elders on Soc. sec. ? I suppose it would ...... not so many jobs out there for elders.... what do you recommend?

[grumpone]

@SaharaDeer If the system was not designed to intentially destoy savings of people, everyone could have savings and investments on which they could retire way before 65 years of age. The traditional way was for old people to have savings and investments to sustain them and when they were feeble, children to take care of them or organised charity. Now the value of savings is being destroyed by inflation, looting of pension funds and people have nothing when they retire. The system has set it up.

[SaharaDeer]

@grumpone yes, that is true, we would have savings... assuming people made enough money to save.... a great many folks just made/make enough to get by...rent, alone is robbery....if you don't own property, ( actually , very few people own property... only when they have finished making their "payments", ...so most of us are all still serfs.....

[grumpone]

@SaharaDeer Imagine how much money you would have without having to pay taxes (how much higher your pay checks would be without your employer having to pay numerous taxes and payments for you). Imagine having an honest money based on intrinsic value not fiat money that has lost 95% of its value since the Federal reserve Bank was scammed into existence. In the 1950s one man employed as a blue collar worker could easily support his stay at home wife and kids and paid off his house in 5-7 years!!

[DrPhallus]

@grumpone Amen to that!

[Aurinkohirvi]

Mr. Burns has Smithers.

[wheelori814]

@Aurinkohirvi i think mr burns is suppose to be rothchild!

[javsmom]

lmfao!!! <3 you're so zoolander aj

[isair81]

So, i haven't been paying attention to the whole google censorship stuff, what's it all about?



[thefirmhandshake]

he was just proving a point. You kids need to wake up

[qminusis]

I'm the biggest wakeupper of all.

And my truther is bigger than yours ...

[obarelida]

alex is super looking and people were envious of him. did i hear that right!!!! alex i like you, you are doing agreat job, but please how about controlling your ego

[echelonexcursions]

ugly ,fat,short,tall,retarded,pimpl­y,stinky,stupid,beautiful,pret­ty,nice smelling,greedy dumbass humans! dont shoot the messenger!

[amanuscar]

@Dissidentsdissent Yes it does, and so does a Voluntaryist/Anarchic society. Watch some of Stefan's videos.

[Dissidentsdissent]

@amanuscar Uhh, no it doesn't. "Yes it does", why don't you explain how, instead of telling me to sift through this guy's channel who has over a 100 videos, of which many are over 45 minutes long.

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent A free market of ideas surely has a much higher chance of taking care of environmental abuse than with what empirically hasn't worked thus far with statism. Statism's track record on issues goes back millenniums & it's not pretty. That's because violent coercive monopolies eliminate your choices in the manner. Just because you don't have any idea how issues could work out in a free society doesn't mean statism is the best hope you got. The definition on insanity comes to mind

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent Look into Stefan's argument for morality vs. the statists' argument from effect. Basically it's admitting that you don't have all the answers. But you do have the ability to rationalize what is right & what is wrong. So defending statism as the only answer to "how will the roads work" is arguing from effect and not for morality. You know it's evil. So be open to letting a free market of ideas come up with the answers. It's a much cheaper and more efficient way to solve issues

[Dissidentsdissent]

What evidence is there that an explosion ideas would erupt if there were no government? The government issues patents to inventors that allow them to sell their product at a profit creating an incentive for innovation in computer technology and medicine. As for how the roads would work if they were left to the free market. I'll tell you how, there won't be any, except for in the big cities and the highways between them.

[Dissidentsdissent]

@nocturnalc When it comes down to it, governments and corporations are made of people, and to call them inherently evil is to call people inherently evil, and if that's case I don't see why a society that is free of government should run any better than your average republic. Why do you think ideas would arise in a totally free market that don't already arise, in a free market there would be no patents and the payoffs for innovation would be marginal and progress would likely stagnate.

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent I didn't say people were borne inherently evil. People descend into varying degrees of immoral behavior in terms of impact/infractions to others that I would describe as evil. I don't believe people are born that way, but it's a disease of the mind that metastasized throughout the world long ago. It certainly could be phased out generationally with an awakening to philosophy & daily implementation.

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent Like I said before to another, just because your mind fails to imagine a free society working out better than a violent & coercive one doesn't mean reality is limited to your imagination. It's not about knowing about how fires would be put out in the 25th century. It's not about if statism is or isn't better/more efficient in monopolized services. It's about morality & principles. Is initiation of force immoral? Yes. And that's the only method it relies on "to serve us"

[Dissidentsdissent]

@nocturnalc YouTube is so shitty at organizing discussions that I'm not going to continue this argument, instead I'm going to picket, call my representatives, and vote. You on the other hand should stop paying taxes and move to your local cave where you can live out the life your dreams.

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent Why should I live in a cave/woods? Parasites have nothing to offer society & it's evolution but violence, coercion, torture, & rape room cells. I'll continue to pay off the mafia for their "protection" & shitty services & consciously live with voluntary interactions in every other facet of my life. Any slave that believes I should be aggressed against for philosophy will have no place in my life. That I have control over. Your actions will have nothing, but sanction/surrender.

[nocturnalc]

@Dissidentsdissent Many ideas do arise, but quickly decay due to the government's strong influences in the market. The regulation & market barriers to entry insures government insider corps continue to dominant despite the lack of consistent innovation, quality, & trust. I don't believe in copyrights/patents. It's another excuse for bloodmoney protection. In certain circumstances, sick people die because of it & society's evolution stagnates. It limits voluntary interactions & pushes up demand.

[grumpone]

@Dissidentsdissent Sure it does, if someone is polluting your private property then they go to jail or pay damages. No government shielding them form responsibility.

[Dissidentsdissent]

@grumpone So what's stopping them from buying up "badlands" for cheap and depositing nuclear waste there.

[ngonea]

selective memory, in the 1960's big gov had to force corporations to hire "others"

and then during the Clinton era, you had the Contract for Amerca, where the oprressed could only get jobs flipping burgers, prior to that the 40's & 50'' generation could only get jobs cleaning white folks houses, while the so called middle calss was running out to the suburbs. Selective memory indeed. You need Tim Wise & Hidden Murder Blogspot, Alex Jones, By: Martha Rose Crow,

"Americas Darkest Secret"

[Plum369]

people are NOT mean to good looking people....they are mean to FAT people.

[olofpalme63]

...we live in closetland

[SuperNick419]

The vid's/pic's in the background are so distracting, in a good way though. It takes twice as long to finish watching your vids cause Im pausing every few minutes to research what I seen in the background. Great show Alex and Co., keep up the good work!

[Adlasyn]

Yes because free-market capitalism is abhorrent to the elite. I can immediately see the logic in that. It certainly does not create an autocratic oligarchy whose power is based on the abstract notion of property rather than popular mandate, and whose wealth exists as a result of their extraction from the wealth creating class. Their assets are certainly self-created and do not prevent the self-actualisation of the vast majority by tireless oppression. Nope no doublethink there.

[windofthegods]

lol he actually thinks he was super good looking LOL

[Marchije]

@windofthegods Super might be overdoing it, but when I saw tapes of him when he was younger (and 30 lbs lighter as he says in the video) I must admit he was a good looking guy: watch?v=ADfERTgwOOY

[roell29]

@Marchije There are some pictures of him flexing in a gym in younger days that are really stunning, I must say (no homo). Can't find them though.

[p666ayr]

I was bullied throughout my education years and never knew why until years down the road I bumped in2 one of my tormentors who proceeded 2 tell me it was simply because I was pretty and had 'perfect' skin :o/ . I Laughed my head off because I had always been insecure about stuff like that in my school years, the irony eh!

[LooksAeterna]

Wait a minute, Alex, a lot of people are on welfare because they CANNOT survive otherwise.

Now either you'll suggest a humane form of euthanasia for the disabled or otherwise you'll apologize for the Renflied-comparison.

[grumpone]

@LooksAeterna You don't get it. If the system wasn't designed to loot you while you do work and destroy the value of your savings intentionally, you wouldn't need any welfare. You'd rely on your savings and the welfare of your family. The same for disabled people - family and friends and charities helped them before government mandated "welfare" was ever introduced.

[grumpone]

@LooksAeterna Calm down, if the system was not rigged so your savings are destroyed by inflation and your investments are looted then people wouldn't need statist "welfare". At present system they cannot survive otherwise - they can, but they use the system as it is easier and the system knows it.

[LooksAeterna]

@grumpone "if the system was not rigged ... then people wouldn't need statist "welfare". "

This is complete and utterly callous bullshit. Hear Tarpley.

You're looking in the wrong direction for the enemies. And as much as I respect a lot of what people like Alex Jones bring out, he is also ignorant of the deeper cause behind everything:

READ:

"Manipulated Man" (Esther Vilar - apparently it takes a woman to help the men)

"The Myth of Male Power" (Warren Farrell)

google: Farrell Myth excerpts

[grumpone]

@LooksAeterna Tarpley is a halfwit. I assume you have read all the books you state? If so, why don't you provide a thought out argument to back your blanket statements based on them instead of telling people to read them. It's intellectually lazy.

[LooksAeterna]

@grumpone "why don't you provide a thought out argument... instead of telling people to read them."

That's how it's done from the educated towards the uneducated. A quantum physicist also cannot blablah you for ages through all the studies he has gone through to bring a high school kid up to speed. He tells them to study physics.

Forgive me if I do not consider youtube a peer review circle, especially with people who unfoundedly state obvious nonsense such as this:

"Tarpley is a halfwit."

[pretorious700]

@LooksAeterna They cannot "survive otherwise" because generations of the welfare state have put them in thrall of government. This is no accident, it creates a captive voting block. I think if you look at welfare rolls you will find that the physically and mentally disabled is a tiny fraction. Volunteerism and private enterprise can care for these people, we've just been conditioned to think otherwise.

[LooksAeterna]

@pretorious700 "Volunteerism and private enterprise can care for these people" bwahaaa. No wonder the US is in such a mess. People there are too primitive.

[pretorious700]

@LooksAeterna Your constipated thought process fails you. You've been conditioned by the state to see things one way-their way. That's "primitive".

[LooksAeterna]

@pretorious700

en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Fallacy

Your "path" doesn't seem to have born much fruit. Any wonder ?

buddhistische-gesellschaft-ber­lin. de/ downloads/ brokenbuddhanew. pdf

Remove spaces in both links.

[harrybath]

@LooksAeterna when he talks about the welfare class he is talking about the elite's. Think about the royal family in england, they are living off welfare that is what he is saying

[LooksAeterna]

@harrybath I hope luxury welfare recipients is what he is talking about but I remain unconvinced since he would have to qualify them as such. I think he is furthering this silly idea that there is no need for a compassionate collective social apparatus, in other words a "state" is the good sense. Lately, a sort of primitive rugged individualism has undermined the truth movement

an unqualified "anti-statism" which is disinformation of the power elite. "Divide et impera" is what they want !

[harrybath]

@LooksAeterna Alex is pro constitution. No income tax, no government intervention, small government. I don't think he means no welfare at all. The prob is that the elites have drained the treasury so all the taxes we have paid our whole lives instead of going towards looking after people in retirement have been spent on wars, government programs ect that elites are running. We could still have small government with Welfare, but the reality is that you can't have everyone lining up at the trough

[LooksAeterna]

@harrybath We have no issue there. It is not an issue of size of the government but of the motivation behind it and the forces that control it. "Statism" versus "Anti-Statism" is the next red herring they are waving in front of people. There are two sources of all this corruption (yes in that order):

2. financial capitalism: there should be no way to make a living of the fact that you have a surplus of the means of exchange. Search for "demurrage", this must substitute interest money.

[LooksAeterna]

(contd.)

1. sexual capitalism: there should be no way for a woman to improve her standard of living (except in a sexual sense) by way of choosing her sexual partners; financial security for children should be in the interest of the whole community (male and female!) and taken off the shoulders of the father. All these horrors against humanity will end exactly whenever the relationship between men and women ceases to be basically modelled after the prostitution paradigm.

[LooksAeterna]

(contd.)

Most important literature of our times:

"Manipulated Man" (Esther Vilar - apparently it takes a woman to help the men)

"The Myth of Male Power" (Warren Farrell)

google: Farrell Myth excerpts

Take care !

[Donatellangelo]

@LooksAeterna I kind of agree, but there's a quote that I want to modify for this situation. Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, allow a man to fish, and he don't need your ass no more! :P

[BeachedWhale09]

@LooksAeterna They cannot survive because the govt has choked private enterprise and destroyed the economy. That drives people into the arms of the govt which makes the problem worse.

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 That doesn't even address the problem. I am sure you will tell us how that concerns the problem of the disabled.

[BeachedWhale09]

@LooksAeterna Sure. If govt is stealing society's resources people cannot afford to give to private charities. These charities do not have the intention of keeping people dependent but to help them get back on their feet and become self-sufficient. Many of the 'disabled' would fall into this category. For those that don't charity and community will easily fill the gap. Its not as though people like that will get left to die in the street. If the majority want to help, they will.

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 Oh come on ! What ignorance of history and reality ! We have had millennia of civilization with hardly any government (except military dominance for exploitation), and surely the place was free of the destitute and lsot disabled, no ? Because all the wealth was flocking to give charity to them ???

Your reckless ignorance, lack of education and consequent cruelty is exactly the reason you get this corrupt government in the US. Down with this evil empire over dumb people !

[BeachedWhale09]

@LooksAeterna Ad hominem says more about you than about me. Militaries are created by govts so you contradicted yourself there. And what wealth do you speak of? The rich guy on the hill who wasn't starving that year? Of course there were destitute people, everyone was destitute! With enlightenment and the rennaissance we moved towards a free society and production exploded as did innovation. And I do more to fight the corruption in this country than complain on the internet. What do you do?

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 "Ad hominem" An ad hominem is a fallacy exclusively if the ad hominem is irrelevant to the speaker's arguments. But your ignorance of history facilitates your nonsense, so it is relevant. Forgive me if I cannot sustitute for yourlack of education by lengthy lessons on youtube.

"Militaries are created by govts so you contradicted yourself there."

Why would that constitute a contradiciton ? I know what a contradicition is, you apparently don't.

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 (contd.) Primitive disinformation idiocies like "Government is inherently good/bad" are coming from you not from me. So in my case there is no contradiciton. What's more, your recation shows you cannot even understand the simple argument here.

Excuse me, but this is too stupid to continue.

People in the US need to understand that shills like whale are exactly what they want: abolish all means of solidarity and "return" to a rugged individualism: divide and conquer.

[BeachedWhale09]

@LooksAeterna "… millennia of civilization with hardly any government (except military dominance for exploitation)" I said that militaries are raised by governments and that is a contradiction to say no government except government. Also, where did I say government is inherently good/bad? “you cannot even understand the simple argument here” What is your argument, that we need a welfare state? It is hard to discern when 80% of your comments are attacks. Through all your vitriol you failed to..

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 "contradiction to say no government except government" Good thing anyone who is not a moron could see I obviously did not say that. I said hardly any government outside its military function. Now you are either malicious or extremely mentally reduced not to see the obvious.

Besides this - which is already reasyon not to talk to you - your stance is so laughable if you consider facts and history, it is mindblowing why I ever reacted to this.

Say hi to your boss Cass Sunstein !

[BeachedWhale09]

@LooksAeterna This will certainly be my last reply since you do not answer my questions nor do you actually provide any facts about your version of history. Your one reply is to attack calling me ignorant. As for those who are not morons reading this (given the topic most are not) they know who is legitimate and who is a troll. Peace.

[LooksAeterna]

@BeachedWhale09 "This will certainly be my last reply" We hope so.

"since you do not answer my questions nor do you actually provide any facts about your version of history."

I have amply given reason why this is so. Besides anyone with only a crude introduction to history knows what a state the social coherence of which rests on "charity" looks like.

[garrethdavis]

damn Molyneux is inspirational

[sacredappleseed]

Looters hate those who say NO & rapists hate those who say NO and tyrannts hate those who say NO. Confuse the evil ones by saying YES to property rights, temple of the body protections &selfdetermination. There are stupid idiots with fancy shirts who protect demons for cash by murdering innocent families with "law". Bullies beware we are done complying with your evil "laws". Righteousness is a natural state for children of God to exist together in harmony with OUR GARDENS. Fnwo&slavedrones2.

[hatchls1]

@sacredappleseed I am for minimalist gov't however what do you mean by a natural state ? "Natural State" implies emergent governance and law. I'm sorry, this may sound nice in theory but is impossible. There must be some minimal amount of law. Natural States can only occur in very small groups, not amongst hundreds of millions of people. Care to argue ? The elites in the world today emerged from a "natural state" because they maneuvered it better than others. The natural state notion is idiotic

[twistedfool420]

I loved that Canadian caller asking those questions. I am Canadian & rarely get to hear news about our country

[SandGs72]

...And humble...  :)

[savemyplaylist]

kook

[Candystrap]

@savemyplaylist Having fun yet Troll? lol!

[savemyplaylist]

@Candystrap you're bat shit crazy!

[Candystrap]

@savemyplaylist kinda like yourself lmao!!!!!!!!!!!

[biozamadotcom]

Some gals like a BBM

[philliptjr1]

Why in the world would AJ want all of us to get involved. If all the tyranny stopped tomorrow and this turned into the Garden of Eden, Mr. Jones would be unemployed. All of the stardom and fame AJ has is because of the globalist. I like AJ, but I do have more than 2 brain cells left, I think. Just think, if all the bad stuff happening now were to suddenley stop, AJ wouldn't be dancing with the stars anymore. He might actually have to get a real job, like working at Wal Mart, or McDonalds.

[BITARTEN]

Remember that the tyrans ruling the System are criminal terrorists,

they are dangerous and won't leave you to be free easily

[jaymthegenius]

What I don't like about McDonald's is that they tell the poor and working class that it is acceptable to feed their children unhealthy excessive sugars and transfats. People should tell them that there are organic and healthy alternatives to such trash food. They could start by going to Whole Foods or Trader Joe's for their food shopping.

[Dissidentsdissent]

@jaymthegenius More like Whole Paycheck.

[nanciqwerty]

Alex - when you have on your show, a guest who can enlighten minds in the way that Stef can, you should give them space to talk so they can do what they're best at.

Leave the phone calls for another time

[Djelomou]

damn Alex you talk too much!!

[biozamadotcom]

aj is super correct here

so many gorgeous gals are incredibly insecure and self conscious

hope they find good men though.

[dharmashooter]

@biozamadotcom Yeah, but Alex Jones as 'archetypically good looking' by his own admonition? I can't imagine any hot girl going anywhere near that fat pudding bowl haircut. What a fucking embarrassment A Jones is! My God! If it wasn't for the fact he puts out good info I wouldn't give that self aggrandising dick the time of day.

[wabfunk]

@dharmashooter So, so, so right ….. I literally rolled on the floor for a good minute when I heard him say that ….. God, I couldn't believe my effing ears …. Give me strength …… "SUPER GOOD LOOKING" …. BOLLOCKS ALEX!!!!!!!, you wife lied to you for fucksakes

[biozamadotcom]

@dharmashooter

"guys lust with their eyes, gals lust with their ears"

Alexjones would strike most females at the idea man because he speaks his mind in very eloquent and articulate fashion.

I can't even tell you how many pigs and hogs I've seen with hot babes. It's quite common.

[biozamadotcom]

@biozamadotcom

"fat cats" would of course get women.

[dharmashooter]

@biozamadotcom Nah, mate. Most attractive women I know like taste and style. Alex Jones is a brash, artless, witless, fat Texan pudding bowl haircut with all the charm of an armadillo. Maybe some hogs are with hot babes but maybe that's because they're being hog-tied, know what I mean?

[biozamadotcom]

@dharmashooter

well written! If I was a babe, I'd swoon.

[dharmashooter]

@biozamadotcom that's cause you're an armadillo!

[watchingandthinking]

@dharmashooter

You're jealous of Alex, man, ha ha ha , Alex rocks !

[biozamadotcom]

totally agree.

he's envious of Alex's intellect.

it's so obvious.

kind of cute. he's getting all "catty" about it.

[OurBackToTheDark]

@biozamadotcom C'mon man. Alex does speak some real cringe worthy crap sometimes. He is a bit of a brash guy with as much tact as a plank of wood. He does his job well, but lets not put him on a pedestal.

[biozamadotcom]

@OurBackToTheDark

i actually don't put him on a pedestal anymore than I would any other person.

he just has it.

[SaharaDeer]

@dharmashooter witless, he is not

[dharmashooter]

@SaharaDeer yeah, Alex Jones is a regular Oscar Wilde isn't he? A laugh a minute. NOT!!

[OurBackToTheDark]

@dharmashooter Amen. Who the hell would say that about themselves and expect to be taken seriously? He is a boorish, loudmouthed, egotistical, self-promoting oaf. He is good at his job, but needs to drop the BS.

[dharmashooter]

@OurBackToTheDark Yeah, and notice how he always says that name and hollywood fame mean nothing, pointedly making it clear that YOU the public are ignorant of such things and slavishly admire these people while HE, although not caring at all, KNOWS these people initimately and name drops in nearly every other show!! What a two faced prick!!!

[OurBackToTheDark]

@dharmashooter That's it. I knew there was another comment of his that riled me. Something like "people think that knowing and meeting these famous Hollywood people will make them fulfilled. Well I can tell you I always spend time with famous people, I know so many celebrities and let me tell you, they are just people."

It's so transparently pathetic and done in such a way that he is trying to earn cred while at the same time downplay it. "Yeh, I always schmooze with the stars. It's nothing".

[grumpone]

@OurBackToTheDark So mentioning it makes him guilty of boasting? I think you have some jelousy issues there. Who cares, he does know some famous people, and said so, so what?

[OurBackToTheDark]

@grumpone Haha, Jealous? Grow up will you.

[AlterEgoTrip]

Society that we know right now, cultivates insecurity, I mean look at all the gorgeous women who hate their so called "flaws"... look at so many good looking people who get plastic surgery. Take for example the case of the drop dead gorgeous woman who got a "breast enhancement" for a wedding present..from her husband to be. She's in a coma now... what was the point of life if she (or he) did not appreciate that which they had.. but that it had to be artificially "beautiful".

[AlterEgoTrip]

This is the control system of self hate. You have to hate yourself (and others) and then this is the essential mechanism of control. That myth that you are not good enough, no matter how good you are controls you. On the other end, this hate for others who have more and less.. is also the way that we are put upon each other.. and those closest to us become our enemies... as planned as well. This is why we need to have an out, love. Why do you think relationships bare the inner psychology?

[tubehax]

Got to love how Alex describes himself as "super good looking" lulz. talk about egos =p

[OurBackToTheDark]

@tubehax Yeah, that got me as well. What a ridiculous asshole thing to say. It made me cringe.

[roell29]

@tubehax It's true! Try googling images for "alex jones" + gym and you will see some pictures of him from his bodybuilding days.

[savemyplaylist]

@tubehax hahahahahahaahha!!!! He's a god among men

[coll0016]

"I was super good looking" lol still can't stand it when he talks about himself xD

But a great interview.

[doc2earth]

I like Alex , even if he's a Vatican loving Jesuit coadjutor. He woke me up, but I know that Alex refuses to talk about cetain things on his show. 1 being Vatican interests , 2 is his refusal to admit that jews run hollywood. Please understand I like Alex, but just think about how easy it would be to find out who is against government by tracking his vids, sites, and who watches them. Your Ip adress has been tracked by watching this vid and so has mine. Just beware, peace!

[billylee13]

@doc2earth he has spoke about the vatican, its just not the hot topic right now, its the fed reserve, and these damn globalist

[THEMAYQUEEN1]

Oh I just realized lol Stefan is the guy who runs the "stefbot" channel here on YT? is that right?

[Sivels]

@THEMAYQUEEN1 yes. If you haven't subbed to him already, your grandmother will die from food poisoning.

[THEMAYQUEEN1]

@Sivels I have subbd him for ages..and my grandmother is already dead lol

[AlterEgoTrip]

@THEMAYQUEEN1  That's the one!! :)

[lokosi1]

first



[capgains]

alex, don't forget those that have inspired you towards reason and evidence, and the types of personalities you have on your show.

[mrmres]

5:44 "Catharine in NY". "Thank God..." Wrong guest to gush this to.

[Kiddolinfen09]

Watch Ireland. They just eradicated minimum wage. We'll see what happens when suddenly tax gets reduced, masses of people scrape around to survive and the crime rate escalates, neighbourhoods devalue, people stop buying shit and take out MORE LOANS... this is so fuckin stupid. lol

[sweetexorcist3]

Man not bad for a Canuck, I thought everybody here is fucking stupid

[luispuente83]

this is just sick

[sh4p3shifter]

first

[KevinSharanTV]

That was a good answer to the first caller but he never said if the banks would shut down in canada or not???

[zamplify]

alex jones is a sexy beast

[grandbbq]

@zamplify LOL...

[Commandok1l]

third

[googlevideosrule]

first

[jwhite1016aol]

first