Al gore eats meat, Even the left views Al gore as fraud

[cupera1]

The nuts that are now promoting Global Warming were promoting Global Cooling back in the 70's, the consensus of scientist were predicted that glaciers would advancing down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. Global warming has been happening for the past 200 years since the Little Ice Age ended, and we still have about 1-2 degrees of warming to fully recover from that.

[Slave2Reason]

Al Gore is a fraud only trying to scam the world and line his pockets... He should be jailed and stripped of his fraudulent gains!

[purechaos2000]

Pretty funny that Beck now says global warming is real and possibly attributed to mankind. Beck is a fucking fraud, so wake the hell up. AGW theory is now shown to be fraudulent thanks to climategate and glaciergate. Now it is proven a hoax Beck is saying it's real. What a fucking turncoat piece of trash Beck is. Follow real conservative libertarians like Dr. Paul and Judge Napolitano.

[Gary1111001]

Beck, and whoever, can't make up their mind. Is warming a hoax?. . . . or is it too late to fix?????

?

?

[skanktimonious]

Shut the fuck up.

N.W.O. What a paranoid child.

[eee8000]

How awesome!!! ))))

Great video!!! )))

[scpark7]

Amazing vid!

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

I would have given this 5 stars instead of 1 if the end wasn't edited out.

[illyounotme]

Cooling, really? Odd, since the Arctic is melting, & countries are scrambling to claim it. Glaciers are shrinking. Giant droughts in the Amazon. This narrow view of Gore being the "Inventor of Global Warming" seems to forget or not know Frank Capra (the famous US gov propagandist) made a movie about it in 1958!!! 50 years ago! See I look at more than one source for information. Gore isn't & has never been my primary source. Glen Beck & you think it is about him. It is about reality of the earth.

[Albertkallal]

Try doing and Google on:

Arctic Ice Increasing Rapidly

Youll see that theres been a significant increase in the rate of ice being created.

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

Uh, no. That data is skewed due to the newer satellites having a wider scan area. The people claiming that ice has increased haven't adjusted for this fact. And they've been outted as wannabes.

[Albertkallal]

There is quite a bit of information and observations that shows increasing glaciers around the world. a.. France Mt. Blanc b.. ECUADOR Antizana 15 Alpha Glacier a.. SWITZERLAND Silvretta Glacier a.. KIRGHIZTAN Abramov a.. RUSSIA Maali Glacier (This glacier is surging. See below)

Greenland glaciers advancing 7.2 miles per year!

[Albertkallal]

NEW ZEALAND

All 48 glaciers in the Southern Alps have grown during the past year.

The growth is at the head of the glaciers, high in the mountains, where they

gained more ice than they lost. Noticeable growth should be seen at the

foot of the Fox and Franz Josef glaciers within two to three years.(27 May

2003) Fox, Franz Josef glaciers defy trend - New Zealand's two best-known glaciers are still on the march - 31 Jan 07 - See Franz Josef Glacier

[Albertkallal]

Alaskan Glaciers Grow for First Time in 250 years

16 Oct 08 - High snowfall and cold weather to blame leading

to the increase in glacial mass.

16 Oct 08 - A bitterly cold Alaskan summer has had surprising results. For

the first time in the area's recorded history, area glaciers have begun to

expand rather than shrink. Summer temperatures, which were some 3 degrees below average, allowed record levels of winter snow to remain much longer, leading to the increase in glacial mass.

[Albertkallal]

Since 1946, the US Geological Survey (USGS) has maintained a research

project measuring the state of Alaskan glaciers. This year saw records

broken for most snow buildup. It was also the first time since any records

began being that the glaciers did not shrink during the summer months.

Those records date from the mid 1700s, when the region was first visited by

Russian explorers.

[DebitPlus]

@Albertkallal

yeah and what the fucks this got to do with anything? the AVERAGE global temperature is rising. its that simple. did you think global warming just meant there wasnt going to be anymore cold days or something?

[Albertkallal]

The average global temperature from 1945 to 1975 was dropping during the huge post war industrial boom with HUGE AMOUNTS of co2 increasing. And we seen for the last 8 years no warming at all. Why would co2 go on a holiday and stop working? And in the Mediaeval warming period temperatures were warmer then today and yet there was less CO2. And in the past we seen higher levels of co2 and yet lower temperatures. Very simple that mans co2 is not driving the temperatures as claimed here at all.

[DebitPlus]

@Albertkallal

lol, this is like debating with a christian.

I'm not even going to bother answering this because you don't even understand the basic fundamentals of global warming. It would be fruitless for me to try.

[Albertkallal]

The IPCC or NASA or the CRU did not point out errors in Al Gores movie. Why does the science community CONTINUE to go along with a fraudster like Al Gore? You cant find ONE major science institution that pointed out ANY errors in Gores movie. As for Christians it was Lord Monckton that pointed out over 30 errors in Gores movie. So no science is correcting Gores errors but Beck and Moncton can? If the great science community cant correct these errors what does that say about the science and Gore?

[DebitPlus]

@Albertkallal

Sorry, go back and read what you said. I cant decode it myself, maybe you'll give it another shit. Are you for Al Gore or against him?

[Albertkallal]

Title of this video shows people on the left becoming wise to Gores hypocrisy and deceit. So Yes I am against Gores lying and deceit and the fact that he is on the board of a directors that trades carbon, and yet he is trying to sell carbon trading to make billions here. I also wonder why his movie has all those errors and no major science institution has good enough science to find and point out those many errors. So yes I am against lying and deceitful people, are not you also?

[DebitPlus]

@Albertkallal Ohhh I see what you trying to say i your previous message. And honestly man, who fuckn knows? We only know what the media tells us.

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

How about you point me to a peer-reviewed science journal to substantiate those claims?

[purechaos2000]

This comment you made is 1 year old... In that year climategate was busted wide open and we now know the peer-review process in climatology has been completely corrupted... So do you now feel like a dumb ass for this comment? You should.

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

Climategate isn't. There's no smoking gun there, just some political types trying to take it out of context.

And morons going along with it.

[purechaos2000]

ROFLMFAO! So Phil Jones stating "I know there ha sbeen no warming since 1998, but if I come out and say that the scientific community will laugh me off the stage"... You mean the over 70 emails where fraud was discussed? You mean the climate models that have been reworked and shown to truncate datasets to present as a single dataset???

Are you serious? Seriously? Climategate was more than just emails my friend. There is reason there are calls for criminal investigation.

[purechaos2000]

I love how you use the Gavin Schmidt line of "taking it out of context". LOL. It took 2 weeks for Schmidt, Jones, and Mann to come up with the official line for it.

i guess the FOIA crimes are ok too. Oh.. or did you not download the data and go through it like I did? Last global warming cultist who used your lame Schmidt regurgitation was assaulted by over 110 posts from me with excerpts from climategate data and other sources exposing the fraud.. If you want I can start posting em.

[purechaos2000]

And have you looked at the list of reviewers on the peer-review papers that have been published since 1999?? Go look.. You find the same people over and over and over again. These same people sit on the board of the IPCC and approve what goes in and does not. It is clearly fraud. Even Phil Jones has now done an interview and said the bulk of the research findings is bullshit, but they "know" it is warming and they just wanted to "save the planet". For god's sake man. It is ADMITTED.

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

>Go look.. You find the same people over and over and over again.

Just not true. And even if it were so, they're peer reviewed journals.

>"Even Phil Jones has now done an interview and said the bulk of the research findings is bullshit"

He never said anything like that at all. Your problem is you get your "science" from Fox News, not first-hand reviews of actual material. I looked at the original interview and Jones even had to clarify the Daily mail's absurd distortion of his claims.

[purechaos2000]

You obviously did not look at the peer review list. You find the same names repeatedly and amazingly a LOT of them were names from the climategate emails.

I don't watch FOX, or any other corp sponsored media. Jones said there has been no significant warming since 1995. Then goes on to say it is due to man anyway.

You are a fucking retard cultist.

It snowed again for the second time in the same year in Houston, TX. We used to have 13 yr snow intervals, now it is EVERY FUCKING YEAR.

[purechaos2000]

Oh I know.. Global warming is "magical" and makes it cold and warm. You and your cult friends are fucking morons and firmly in the minority where you will stay.

How you like that Pachauri scam with the glacier? A peer-review paper on the Himalayan Glacier shrinking.. Science BASED ON A PHOTOGRAPHY STUDENTS PICTURES IN SUMMER... ROFLMFAO..

The ice in my tea melted after i left it out for 30 minutes.. That must be global warming too...

[purechaos2000]

Go ahead and respond and i will post 100 snippets from your climate science gods discussing their fraud..

[SaganAppreciationSoc]

Also, I find it funny, that while the flat-earthers claim that "it's the same researchers all the time", they have no problem using one guy over and over again - Phil Jones, as if he (if he had actually said any of the things Faux News types claimed) is somehow able to contradict all the other scientists who have said AGW is real.

[purechaos2000]

HAHAHA. You took the flat-earther thing from Al Gore. You are fucking moron.. If you think CO2 is killing the planet.. help us save it by

killing yourself stupid self.

You are a crazy cultist who follows people who won't even do the things they ask you to do. You are a fucking moron falling for a UN scam. In the 1970s "ALL THE SCIENTISTS AGREED" CO2 was causing us a new ice age. The UN (who runs the IPCC) stated in the 60s they needed a global crisis to bring in global governance by the UN.

[purechaos2000]

The scientists who said AGW is not real and it is natural have been demonized and politically terrorized by the AGW promoters who are profitting from it!! Moron.

You probably think carbon credits are good.. Its a fucking Enron cooked scam. LOL. Ken Lay cooked it up. You know the crook that faked the Cali energy crisis?

[purechaos2000]

The scientists who disagree like John Christy (whom Phil Jones admitted cooling to since 1998) have received notable awards from real scientific societies..

The AGW scientists like Jones only have received awards from fucking groups they started that are part of your AGW cult..

You are in the minority and will stay that way. Especially with the "coldest winter in 100 years" occurring in 2009.

Go peddle your fake bullshit somewhere else. LOL

[Albertkallal]

Al Gore is the most visible leader and proponent that YOUR side chose for mans co2 output causing global warming. He getting academy awards and noble awards. Your side latched on to his wagon. Why choose such a charlatan and used car salesman as your leader? If you have all the science on your side then this should be a slam dunk. Why then does Gore resort to lies and deceptions to make a point? Should not Gore not set an example and stop stuffing his face with big juicy burgers?

[Albertkallal]

What conspiracy? Strange that Gores on the Board of Directors of a company that trades carbon credits? (that's not conspiracy just old fashioned greed and self-interest). You dont thing governments and UN around the world dont live off of taxation? Carbon tax = more money is not conspiracy, just good old fashioned greed and a way to take more money from you. If these people could trade water on Stock Exchange to take money from you they would, and they doing the same with the carbon tax.

[illyounotme]

Only conspiracy I have seen is from the ignorant that try to pretend Climate change isn't happening, that humans have nothing to do with it. I have no leader, Gore does not speak for me. As to more ice, warmer planet, more evaporation, thus more precipitation. Doesn't take much to understand. What you fail to mention, is the amount of ice remaining. Oh right the amount is shrinking, the ice thinner, and the Arctic opening new passages. My side is reality, you should visit some time.

[purechaos2000]

Climate change is happening.. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN HAPPENING... People are just smart enough to know CO2 is not a climate driver. CO2 was chosen back in the fucking 70s when it was cooling to be blamed, then when it started to warm and suddenly it was CO2... Then in the 90s Ken Lay came up with the CO2 credit scam that is now being pushed by millionaires like Al Gore that is profitting from it.

[illyounotme]

Actually you are talking about Climate Change, your ignorance of that shows how little you know. The two are different lables for the same thing. I see how invested you are in trying to not believe reality, and how much you trust one source, Glen Beck, for the majority of your information. Good luck in pretending it isn't happening.

[Albertkallal]

No theyre not the same thing. If we dont have any global warming right now and the worlds is now cooling how can we call that global warming? How can they possibly mean the same thing? (gee you really cant figure this out! Wow..just wow!). You can play a game of a English semantics and play word games here, but at the end of the day the issue is all about mans co2 and is it driving temperature. We dont see taxes being pushed for water vapor or methane do we, but we sure do for co2.

[Albertkallal]

As for the sources of these videos, theyre from all over the place. Kind of interesting that because the message doesnt agree with your point of view, then it must be the messenger to be attacked. In other words those people who are intellectually bankrupt and cant debate the issues simply move on and attack the messenger. If you believe in attacking the messenger and not the issue then should I not apply that reasoning to you? Why should I trust your message and what youre saying then?

[illyounotme]

Not semantics misinformed Glen Beck worshiper. Two different lables for the same things. You just prefer one over the other. Again I will say good luck in pretending it isn't happening. I just feel sorry for the few who actually think you know what your talking about. Step out of your Glen Beck isolation and study the real science.

[Albertkallal]

If there is no global warming right now then the term global warming is simply incorrect to apply to the temperatures we are seeing (was that too hard?). The problem here is that your science does not show that mans co2 is driving the temperature. Why then are you making an act of faith that it does? The question now comes down to what authority you going to submit your will to make that act of faith. Youre not using science but making an act of faith and telling me its science when its not

[illyounotme]

Climate Change, means weather changes. The use of Global warming is not to mean the temp rises everywhere. More snow some places, less others. Mt Kilimanjaro for example! Or the Brazilian rain forest not getting rain. Austraila also has had a druaght for 7 years, and has been seriously discussing evacuation of the content. Climate change any one? Man is not the only cause, I will say Nature has its place too. So does it make sense to turn the heater on in your car on a hot sumer day?

[Albertkallal]

Im not talking about climate change we are talking about global warming and is mans co2 causing that warming? No study that shows theres been increasing severity or extremes of weather (switching topic from global warming to climate change is a bait and switch). It has been colder and it been warmer in the past, and it will be in the future. Furthermore when I said global cooling I didnt just means some weather extremes, we taking about the world average and it is now dropping.

[Albertkallal]

As for Mt Kilimanjaro? What a load Gores claims are. His big graph shows co2 FOLLOWING temperature. That guy is just a used car salesmans. However it is a little bit strange that Al Gore is on the Board of Directors of a company that trades carbon credits.

You want see the silliness of his claims in that movie simply watch my video called

CO2 follows Temperature, Gore lies

And here is another one:

How Al Gores Movie Inconvenient Truth is full of crap

[illyounotme]

Too late, as in it is already happening, we can lessen the problem from getting worse, but can not stop it from happening. It is sad to see people still trying to argue this is not happening. Al hasn't even metoned the worst case senerio. There is a frozen methane shelf deep underwater around the oceans, if the water warms and if that is released...well there is no chance for much adaption. Only deep bunkers and centuries of living underground. Every day of delay, means more death more problem!

[Albertkallal]

There is no warming but in fact are experiencing worldwide cooling now. Weve had the coldest winter in China in 100 years, snow in Baghdad for first time in 80 years, Snow fell in Jerusalem and stayed on the ground for the first time in recent history. Australia just experienced their coldest weather in 60 years. The ski resorts in Europe are open about a month early this year. Mans co2 is NOT driving the temperature but if you lets these money traders tax co2 they will gladly take your money.

[fredthefly]

Our contribution regarding greenhouse gases as carbon dioxide amounts to 0.43 of 9-27 % of the total greenhouse effect.

He seemed to forget Archimedes law and other laws.

Greenland won't melt and the North pole consists mostly of sea ice.

[raymondbe]

All this Al Gore criticism is a distraction.

[ThumperBunny43]

Al Gore could help by setting a good example and becoming vegan. It's SO hypocritical that he still eats animals and contributes to global warming.

[Fingerlingduck]

who cares if Al Gore eats meat? Its not the end of the world.

[ross1323]

Mahatma Ghandi once said, "Be the change you want to see in the world." If Al wants to push his message to people and take him seriously, he needs to start walking the walk and not just talking the talk like a hypocrite does.

[naatee]

See the problem is that most people misinterpret Gore's message. He never suggested you shouldn't eat meat. Nor does he suggest any other lifestyle changes (although this wouldn't be a bad thing). He proposed change through government regulation. Much more impact could be made through government regulation than lifestyle choices ever would, and he understands this.

[suckitjesus2]

All the major scientists believe we're causing global warming. I wonder who i'll believe. Glenn Beck or the worlds top scientists?

[fourlayers]

That's not true.

[jdbgq]

I believe Glen Beck! The worlds top scientist consist of non-scientist. Most of them are not even scientist. One is a gynecologist! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!

[kenroth]

The left's big problem is that they NEVER practice what they preach. They're the people who support public schools but send their own little scions to private ones(e.g.,the Kennedys). As for the "freedom" they tout, they'll use the courts faster than anyone else to impose their nonsense on the rest of us.Gore is the usual leftwing tyrant.

[suckitjesus2]

Al Gore is not left wing you fool. Dennis Kucinich is liberal (who is vegan). Peta is liberal. Al Gore is nothing but a stupid fat moderate. Do you understand now?

[everybodysayyeah]

I don't understand how the states can call this news. it's a theater.

[NaturalSelection2]

Not to mention that calluing him a hypocrite implies that he asked people to stop eating meat, which he didn't do. He simply asked them to limit their carbon footprint in other ways. Regardless, as you seem unable to grasp, this has no merit in addressing his message. By the way, nice generalization. Not all Liberals are hypocrites. Liberalism isn't synonymous with environmentalism, because Liberals, unlike many Conservatives, allow dissent within their ranks. It's called freedom of expression.

[NaturalSelection2]

Oh by the way, it was the right-wingers that booed and hissed at Gore. Liberal leader Stephane Dion said Gore was right. Conservatives are setting far lower standards for environmental issues no matter how you look at it. Besides, FOR THE LAST TIME, hypocrisy does NOT INVALIDATE his message.

[Albertkallal]

Well, as usual, who said here that hypocrisy invalidates the message? I did not make that claim. What hypocrisy does is garner LESS respect for the message. There is no law that says thou shall do what one preaches, but when you don't, then you suffer the wrath of criticizing. Gore's hypocrisy just serves to show what a used car opportunistic sales man he is. This all about his election plans for president.

[NaturalSelection2]

*Gore's.

Oh, now I see what you mean about his house (where the hell did SUVs come into this?). Yes I have no problem if you limit your carbon footprint in a larger house. He doesn't use ten times as much in the sense I'm talking about. Certainly if the average American lived in a larger house, they'd use far more energy than he does. The point can't be made any more obvious.

[NaturalSelection2]

Could you clarify, please? It's hard to follow what the hell you're saying. I never mentioned SUVs.

Anyway, as for houses, Yes Al Gire's house is 10 000 square feet. Does he have to move into a studio apartment before he has the right to talk about climate change? He's not asking people to move into smaller houses, but to limit their carbon footprint. He's practicing what he preaches by using solar panels and such.

[Albertkallal]

He does not have to move into a studio apartment, but he should try and set and example. So, in place of a private jet (at $150,000 per day), he could take a regular commeral flight and SHARE his green house emissions. The same goes for his limo. PETA sent him a letter pointing out that eliminating meat from man's diet would have a GREATER EFFECT HEN ALL CARS AND TRUCKS combined! Gore makes no effort to set an example. That is why the left booed and hissed at him in Canada.

[NaturalSelection2]

Fair enough, though it depends on where you go in Canada. I am Canadian, so I'd know.

Though, again, Conservative douchebags are in no place to criticize Gore any more than he is to criticize them.

[Albertkallal]

Yes, but the hysterical funny part is that getting booed and hissed at a leftist socialist and feminist college is funny. We talking about the left here!! What is EVEN MORE incredible is where else was this event reported in the press? (oh, right, I forgot the mainstream press is incredibility biased and thus we never see this report anywhere else!!).

[NaturalSelection2]

Because it has no bearing on his message? It's funny how you criticize the media yet upload media criticism of Gore. Also, Fox News certainly mentioned that. If you don't mind, I have other things to do besides responding to YouTube comments, so stop drying to dismiss Al Gore by turning away from the real issue and forming ad-hominem attacks. Concordia isn't all socialist considering the fact that there's a gathering of neocons at Concordia who even have a website devoted to them.

[NaturalSelection2]

Nce ad-hominem attack. I don't know about the meat part. I'd have to research that, but I do know the supposed excess use of energy by Al Gore is utter bullshit. Due to the character limit I can't say much, but his energy use PER SQUARE FOOT falls in the average range, and much of that is from solar panels & flourescent lights. As for Glenn Beck, he's hated because he slants info, not because of his views.

[Albertkallal]

Right, so it now per square foot. So, I can happily drive my SUV because the energy used based on road space, and square foot print is average. Except your forgetting that it 10 times as big in Gores case. So, my house is 10 times larger, and I use 10 times as much, and you have no problem with this at all. Ok..

[SardonicusRexx]

The "junk science" guy lost his credibility when he distorted other peoples claims.

[Albertkallal]

So, Gore can say anything he wants, but still gets respect and credibility. However, this "science" guy has one thing that is slightly bent, and you give him zero credibility? Glad to see that you hold people who disagree with you to a perfect standard, but those who agree with you are free to say anything they want. Man, I love the hypocrisy of you liberals. Give gore any leeway to spew out what he wants, but not give this same leeway to others?

[forkeat]

real men don't eat quiche,

and

real scientists don't agree with al gore

[rushjunkie007]

I think the problem is when we fall to hard to either side...Yeah there is a problem, no not as deadly as proclaimed, but probably more so than often given credit by right wingers. Balance is good...open-minds are good too.

[thereallurker]

Whenever I see Glen Beck, I just change the channel. He's not a journalist.

[Albertkallal]

So, you mean that Gore was not jeered at this meeting, or that you just like liberal journalists only see, hear, and look at what you already believe in the first place? Great, just change the cannel when something does not agree with you! That is formula for a narrow mind.

The problem is there not a paper, news show, or reporter that mentioned the skeptical reception that Gore received at this talk. Your basically telling me that you choose to be blind.

[domndiane]

Thats right Albert, just close your eyes and kiss your ass goodbye! Thats what these warmahalolics want & do whenever people start thinking for them selves. Be carefull you may be accused of being in the pay of big oil...I already have! LOL

[NaturalSelection2]

Right, because you don't change the channel, you'd just sit there enjoying CNN & MSNBC.

[canofsand]

thereallurker, translated:

"Whenever I see a conservative on TV, I close my eyes, plug my ears, and sing 'La la la!' He doesn't agree with my set-in-stone viewpoint, so he must be an idiot." (And no, he's not a journalist. He's too honest to be one.)