Monk played rhythm with harmony. Melody was not part of his vocabulary although there are tunes that have a form of melody. He leaves the melodic structure up to his sidemen.
I can assume that Thelonious studied the rudiments of music but apparently, he'd gone far beyond the basics of music theory. Does anyone know where Thelo studied or who he studied with? Just watching him play shows his expertise in physically dominating the keys. He's awesome and obviously knows what the hell he's doing. I'd still like to know where he studied when he first began playing piano. His mastery of the piano is like no other. He's absolutely confident in his ability to play. Wow!
I love Monk's collection of hats. If you look at his videos on YouTube, you will see a vast array of hats (like this Chinese inspired one or others from around the world). He was one cool cat. That's for sure.
@CountBuffon get any picasso painting of a bull to glance at,any monk solo to listen to and a pen to freehand as many 5sided polygons as you can before the song is over.is your creation kaleidescopic,a shadow or a refection of you or somthing you favor
its physicalologicaly chromatic with subtle hints of webian tonality. a tonality close to vulcan music that has no particular emotion in mind other motion.
Man, Thelonious is a tank. What av absolute legend... does anyone know where i can find a video of him where he's playing with the squirrels in his hair lol... Would be very grateful :P
Actually, it almost is true. When he plays two notes that are a half step apart (directly next to each other) at the same time, it implies a quarter tone.
I was in the Jazz Gallery in the East Village one night and Monk was playing. After the set I spied Gil Evans and I went over to him and asked if he was going to make an something of "Crepuscle" and he exclaimed "Oh yeah man!" . Don't think he ever got around to it.
Yes, it is nostalgic...part blues, part...well, Monk. This is one of his most challenging pieces, and one that works best by himself. Pure originality. I can't think of any other music quite "like" this. Great performance. Where's the rest of the show? Also...check out the intense use of pedal near the end. Wow.
Skullketon : Use the lift right side & click "thelonious monk - jazz portrait 2/6 - crepuscule with nellie " or type it to find out the complete footage. Have a nice day.
This song is so beautiful. I think the tenderness I feel for my wife has lent me some insight into what he was feeling for his wife, when she was ill. He wrote this when Nellie was in the hospital you know.
"Modal" and "tonal" are not mutually exclusive. In fact, modality REQUIRES tonality. Check out Miles' KIND OF BLUE, which is the textbook example of modal jazz—it's so very tonal.
Having made this comment over two years ago my opinions have changed. But to give you a proper answer, I believe at the time I was trying to say that Monk very much adhered to traditional major/minor tonality, no matter how much he loved to veer round its fringes with added tones, whole tone scales and omitted thirds. However, I am no Monk expert and it is very possible he could have dabbled in modal harmonies. Yet I maintain that Monk never had a long 'modal phase' like Miles.
I don't see how a chord can be more or less abstract. A chord is something very concrete, a given set of tones which are to be played simultaneously. But I'd like to hear your opinion on the "abstract" nature of his chords. I'd rather say Monk's chords are quite complex since they use a lot of extensions and alterations.
A good example of abstract ideas in music is the Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization by George Russell.
@rbnlenin You're perfectly right, it was a very bad choice of words. As you say, his chords are complex: the extensions, altered/omitted chord tones, etc.; they're lots of fun, but I'm really just an amateur on the subject.
(Russell's theory is fascinating. THAT is "abstract", as such a radically different view of harmony.)
I'll remove my old comment so it doesn't cause any more confusion. I shouldn't have made claims that were both unclear and insupportable.
I wouldn't say that I'm right or you're wrong, we're not talking mathematics here.
It's not really a bad choice of words since every chord is really an abstraction for all possible voicings of that chord. In that sense all chords are abstract.
Complex is also a bad description of his chords because of what you mentioned; omitted chord tones. A dominant 7th chord with omitted 3 and 5 is just two chord tones. I would hardly call that complex.
@rbnlenin from the harmonic series key of C, you can play the 3rd partial 'g',5th par. 'e', 7th par.bflat.,and believe it or not its a double tritone.some people train themselves to hear as many partials possible from one note.then integrate that skill into their harmony. this type person maybe playing for himself first the audience second.monk might have wolf ears! whats implied to you maybe clear to him.you dont know what hes playing till he explain it. he may say it doesnt matter.
The less notes you play the more can be implied from it in that specific instance, the context however leads the brain to fill in the blanks.
As Monk himself said: "I want it to be as easy as possible so people can dig it. And then, it should be good. A song is like that, it's easy." (Robin D.G. Kelley, Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original, FreePress 2009)
@rbnlenin exactly.but if i play c,octave c,g,c,e,g,bflat on the piano, im doing numerous things.ideally im playing one note, low c .physically im playing the first seven notes of the harmonic series.and im telling my brain that this is how much i have to forgive the western tuning system.implying the ideal ,the actual, and the entropy within the system.i get what monk is saying but its still the piano.sacrifice harmonic accuracy for virtual freedom=cultic art.picasso did this.
Yes, of course a frequency analysis of a low c played on a piano would yield the first seven notes of the harmonic series. A note is implied if it is not directly played by the musician, so even though it's clear to Monk it's still implied (directly played = key pressed down). From a perspective of harmony it would seem to me that really any chord (played on a piano) containing a C for example could be implied by a C since they contain the frequencies of C played on the piano.
@ohmphthschwrhu im saying cultic art is that part of culture which occurs frequent enough in your mind to make you pursue it,want it ,need it.picasso did this with the lines of the bull.i remember him explaing his facination with this .if theres a recording of monk explaining THIS i'd love to see/hear it.maybe he made some dissonant stuff as easy as possible to dig!what would this type dissonance sound like IDEALLY in tune with the harm. series?
"how you gonna tell me to punc n spell right? i just broke the world record with most consonants between 2 muufuckin vowels? ohmphthschwrhu! and you can pronounce every consonant though you might bite your tongue.but just say i'm shrewd , silent d. ;D oops loud d ;( oops ghost d , .. . . . . . . ;D . i dont inend to spell right until i at least can use 3 fangurs to diddy bop/type. putting both hands up on the key board hurts my back."
The way I see it, Monk implies interesting harmonic ideas that the advanced ear can hear but even if you don't have that you'll dig it because of the simplicity. It's a bit like higher mathematics, simple equations but yet so difficult for the uninitiated.
Oh by the way, you can find the quote in the documentary Straight No Chaser. Also I would like to express my contempt for Youtube's commentary system, it's clearly not made for intelligent discussion.
@rbnlenin i saw straight no chaser 20yrs ago.even if the advanced ear can hear it.its still dissonant against a hill of forgiveness because of tuning.we forgive wine for not tasting like juice.this is cultic effect.higher mathematics,complex and simple are fine in the mind but becomes so so flawed when brought into this world.unintitiated, unculterated yes!because what is raga?don't know.why is picasso painting like a first grader?dont know.can monk really play a piano???uninitiated.
You may want to take a course in English or write while not intoxicated. By the way; raga literally means colour in Sanskrit.
Mathematics cannot be flawed since it requires proof and in fact mathematics only really exists in it's unambiguous written form. If it's ambiguous then it's not mathematics.
@rbnlenin i have a book called 'harmonic experience' the auther dedicated this book to pandit pran nath,an indian raga player.just type in indian raga music on youtube and you'll see.it may mean colour but just type in indian raga music.mathematics in its unambiguos form is an ideal. when you apply it to this physical world .if you think its nonsense fine im not offended.if you are then thats you're at.also i was nt talking about monk i was talking about the equal tempered scale
I do know what Raga-based music is, a raga is simply a mode. A scale upon which a melody is formed according to several other rules. It is also the basis for modal jazz.
There is no such thing as ambiguous mathematics, only poor mathematicians.
The equal tempered scale is not entirely accurate for every key I know, but tuning the instrument for every key may be a bit tedious and inflexible.
When analysing music one must be careful not to involve spirituality as a means of explanation. I'm going to take a look at that book, sounds interesting :)
@rbnlenin look get this book and you'll get what im saying.the equal tempered scale is WAY! worse than you think.this book shows dydemic commas,pythagorean commas,the diesis comma,the diaschisma comma etc..its gives full examples throughout.it cost me $45 bucks u.s. .its too much to explain. its the best theory ever. absolutely worth it.
@ohmphthschwrhu IMAGINE.god takes 2 poles and anchors them in space .he takes an infinite guitar string and ties it to the poles and pulls the string tight .he plucks the string and this world comes into existence.do you see the big bang/big crunch dynamic in this proverbial string?shall i call hydrogen my fundamental tone?helium my duplicator?carbon my triplicator etc.if what you believe makes you dogmatic fine but you can disbelieve it at anytime.especially if you're young.
I have no problem with mixing spirituality and jazz. What I do have a problem with though is non-objectiveness in the analysis of the music because otherwise it's not a scientific analysis. In my opinion musicology should strive to be a science (social science) and therefore not include subjective values in the analysis of music.
Of course these subjective values cannot be completely eliminated but then that's why I wrote "strive to be". Spiritual and therefore subjective values have no place in music analysis unless it's regarded as a factor that is also analysed objectively (otherwise it would be difficult to analyse Coltrane's later works for example).
@rbnlenin [The equal tempered scale is not entirely accurate for every key I know, but tuning the instrument for every key may be a bit tedious and inflexible] this was the point i was trying to get you to.we all sacrifice this acurracy for the freedom to play the same melody ,not so much harmony though,anywhere on 88.true accuracy is maximum rigid. its simply playing the harmonic series and those notes only. 30 available notes in 5 octaves.- cont. to prt 2
@ohmphthschwrhu 30 notes available within 5 octaves.the more you deviate from this single series from a single string or node, the more entropy is added to the system and we haven't even gotten to common note ambiguiteis, comma caused ambiguities and a shitty(i love it cause i love art)tuning system YET, and im dealing with a roland phantom g6 compared to you fansy yamaha grand.stop being arrogant professor.'piratebay' the book.Up bubble now,hope i dont get the 'bends' whew! ;D;D
It's 60 notes in 12 tone equal temperament system on 5 octaves actually. 12*5 = 60.
A short google-ing of the terms "common note ambiguity" (but I guess you're getting at enharmonics) and "comma caused ambiguity" leads to no relevant results, this could only be the case if those terms are rarely used in musicology or that are specific to that book of yours. Therefore it's not fair to assume that people will know those terms unless you express that you assume people have read it
He must have loved Nellie very much.
Shooters141 2 months ago
Monk played rhythm with harmony. Melody was not part of his vocabulary although there are tunes that have a form of melody. He leaves the melodic structure up to his sidemen.
monktrane325 2 months ago
Sounds like honky tonk in the wild west, but not.
John27346 2 months ago
I can assume that Thelonious studied the rudiments of music but apparently, he'd gone far beyond the basics of music theory. Does anyone know where Thelo studied or who he studied with? Just watching him play shows his expertise in physically dominating the keys. He's awesome and obviously knows what the hell he's doing. I'd still like to know where he studied when he first began playing piano. His mastery of the piano is like no other. He's absolutely confident in his ability to play. Wow!
gfine2000 3 months ago in playlist Happy Birthday, Thelonious Monk
THE BEST ON PIANO "EVER", flipo con esa música, TM ME CAUSA CALAFRIOS...
RosaBarroca 4 months ago
what is the geniality... HOW MUCH THELONIOUS MONK SENSE FOR MINIMALISM AND SILENCE WAS IN JOHN CAGE?
RosaBarroca 4 months ago
My man...
doko73 5 months ago
sounds like someone who knows what they're doing, and what they're doing is trying to sound like they don't know what they're doing.
themusicchap 5 months ago
A beautiful tribute to his wife, whom he loved without fail.
nevikmoore 5 months ago
I love Monk's collection of hats. If you look at his videos on YouTube, you will see a vast array of hats (like this Chinese inspired one or others from around the world). He was one cool cat. That's for sure.
Doleafol 8 months ago 5
An amazing man of music. The King of Bebop!
JazzyZenBrotha 8 months ago
Peace to the god
dizyootum 8 months ago
This is Crepuscule with Nellie.
NESavoth415 9 months ago
Comment removed
NESavoth415 9 months ago
what a G
NESavoth415 9 months ago
Actually, he reminds me very much of Duke.
impala327 10 months ago
To me, this song sounds exactly like baby animals learning how to walk. I kind of want to produce a nature documentary now just for that reason.
CountBuffon 10 months ago 7
@CountBuffon That's an awesome interpretation and idea
kirksiesz 10 months ago
@CountBuffon get any picasso painting of a bull to glance at,any monk solo to listen to and a pen to freehand as many 5sided polygons as you can before the song is over.is your creation kaleidescopic,a shadow or a refection of you or somthing you favor
ohmphthschwrhu 9 months ago
This is unbelievable. Only Dirty Projectors are doing today what Thelonious set in motion.
PorroFirst 1 year ago
@PorroFirst Elaborate please.
diddletang 10 months ago
Only Monk could get away with playing between the cracks! Pure genius! Listen to Fred Hersch playing Monk. Unbelievable!
billroue 1 year ago
Monk was it
zhaydhee 1 year ago
lol at the jazz snobs
swing2bop1 1 year ago 2
amazed at how many ppl comment on musical terms without having really no FUCKING idea of what they're talkin
DajaWaja 1 year ago 2
a beautiful mind.
tomitstube 1 year ago
fa mi ri mi sol la sol la do = )
keyzcity 1 year ago
I still get chills from all the "wrong" notes. And I love all the descending harmonic lines, like the sun setting.
Bondelev 1 year ago 3
flat 5's bras
Sodium420420 1 year ago
its physicalologicaly chromatic with subtle hints of webian tonality. a tonality close to vulcan music that has no particular emotion in mind other motion.
jacmar555 1 year ago
Crepuscule: Twilight. Dig Master Monk hanging with wife Nellie in the cool of the changing light. That's for you DC!
outlawv 1 year ago
No, It's Zen mind.
He is Monk.
soutousyu 1 year ago
No it's harmonic and symphonic with playing two halftones like B&C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
Modal? CANTALOUPE ISLAND??? WHAT!?!? argggg.
WTF... Seriously?
Andrewrb010 1 year ago
modal or tonal it's not important. the art of Thelonious is important.
sweetlorrainesweet1 1 year ago
Man, Thelonious is a tank. What av absolute legend... does anyone know where i can find a video of him where he's playing with the squirrels in his hair lol... Would be very grateful :P
Ashwin
AshwinManOfSteel 2 years ago
Monk-he played the music that was in between the keys...yea, thats how he did it, yea, that was the trick.....Nah, he was just -a genius.RIP
golds04 2 years ago 16
That's a brilliant description, poetically is not literally true!
gluce 2 years ago
Oops, I mean "if not."
gluce 2 years ago
Actually, it almost is true. When he plays two notes that are a half step apart (directly next to each other) at the same time, it implies a quarter tone.
MilesTrane21 2 years ago
@golds04 hes got 88 puppet strings hooked to the 88 keys on his piano.ten fingers for motive motion and emotion.
ohmphthschwrhu 9 months ago
Fantastic, thanks for sharing. Where, when and how do you get to film this???
jovesheerwater 2 years ago
wunderrrrrschön.
johnteddyJoe 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone who likes Middle Eastern beats should check out Jimi productionz song called You already know. Its a Scott Storch type beat
TheMickswagga 2 years ago
I was in the Jazz Gallery in the East Village one night and Monk was playing. After the set I spied Gil Evans and I went over to him and asked if he was going to make an something of "Crepuscle" and he exclaimed "Oh yeah man!" . Don't think he ever got around to it.
slender1 2 years ago
"seeionowhamplayin"
clintisfake 2 years ago
gracias flaco, joya nunca taxi
rockerbike64 2 years ago
I never get enough of those pauses and everything. So right.
tidalriddle 2 years ago
the blue note master. melodious thunk.
what a mind.
tomitstube 2 years ago
Love T
SWEETCHOCOLATEHONEE 2 years ago
Yes, it is nostalgic...part blues, part...well, Monk. This is one of his most challenging pieces, and one that works best by himself. Pure originality. I can't think of any other music quite "like" this. Great performance. Where's the rest of the show? Also...check out the intense use of pedal near the end. Wow.
drbrookman 3 years ago
PUTA MADRE!!!
killingMockbird86 3 years ago
I can listen to this song for hours. It holds so much nostalgia that just takes me different places in my life.
eyesoulsmart 3 years ago 2
I'm personally amazed its of colour footage of Thelonious, these are so hard to find.
Wonderful music as always :)
(Do you know where the complete footage is?)
skullketon 3 years ago
Skullketon : Use the lift right side & click "thelonious monk - jazz portrait 2/6 - crepuscule with nellie " or type it to find out the complete footage. Have a nice day.
jamyro22 3 years ago
I noticed that 4 weeks ago but hey, thanks for the heads up.
skullketon 3 years ago
Gracias por subirlo!
PabloVestory 3 years ago
This song is so beautiful. I think the tenderness I feel for my wife has lent me some insight into what he was feeling for his wife, when she was ill. He wrote this when Nellie was in the hospital you know.
mrdhikrbeads 3 years ago
Comment removed
justinomorales 3 years ago
I think, this is magic.
theloniousmonk81 3 years ago 5
Comment removed
skullketon 3 years ago 8
@skullketon modal jazz is still tonal
jazzytrav8681 1 year ago
@skullketon
"Modal" and "tonal" are not mutually exclusive. In fact, modality REQUIRES tonality. Check out Miles' KIND OF BLUE, which is the textbook example of modal jazz—it's so very tonal.
NewtHarvest 1 year ago
@NewtHarvest
Having made this comment over two years ago my opinions have changed. But to give you a proper answer, I believe at the time I was trying to say that Monk very much adhered to traditional major/minor tonality, no matter how much he loved to veer round its fringes with added tones, whole tone scales and omitted thirds. However, I am no Monk expert and it is very possible he could have dabbled in modal harmonies. Yet I maintain that Monk never had a long 'modal phase' like Miles.
skullketon 1 year ago
@skullketon
I don't see how a chord can be more or less abstract. A chord is something very concrete, a given set of tones which are to be played simultaneously. But I'd like to hear your opinion on the "abstract" nature of his chords. I'd rather say Monk's chords are quite complex since they use a lot of extensions and alterations.
A good example of abstract ideas in music is the Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization by George Russell.
But that's just me.
rbnlenin 4 months ago
@rbnlenin You're perfectly right, it was a very bad choice of words. As you say, his chords are complex: the extensions, altered/omitted chord tones, etc.; they're lots of fun, but I'm really just an amateur on the subject.
(Russell's theory is fascinating. THAT is "abstract", as such a radically different view of harmony.)
I'll remove my old comment so it doesn't cause any more confusion. I shouldn't have made claims that were both unclear and insupportable.
skullketon 4 months ago
@rbnlenin
I wouldn't say that I'm right or you're wrong, we're not talking mathematics here.
It's not really a bad choice of words since every chord is really an abstraction for all possible voicings of that chord. In that sense all chords are abstract.
Complex is also a bad description of his chords because of what you mentioned; omitted chord tones. A dominant 7th chord with omitted 3 and 5 is just two chord tones. I would hardly call that complex.
rbnlenin 4 months ago
@rbnlenin
There are some words that seem to describe his chords unambiguously. For example "beautiful".
rbnlenin 4 months ago
@rbnlenin from the harmonic series key of C, you can play the 3rd partial 'g',5th par. 'e', 7th par.bflat.,and believe it or not its a double tritone.some people train themselves to hear as many partials possible from one note.then integrate that skill into their harmony. this type person maybe playing for himself first the audience second.monk might have wolf ears! whats implied to you maybe clear to him.you dont know what hes playing till he explain it. he may say it doesnt matter.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu Part 1:
The less notes you play the more can be implied from it in that specific instance, the context however leads the brain to fill in the blanks.
As Monk himself said: "I want it to be as easy as possible so people can dig it. And then, it should be good. A song is like that, it's easy." (Robin D.G. Kelley, Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original, FreePress 2009)
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@rbnlenin exactly.but if i play c,octave c,g,c,e,g,bflat on the piano, im doing numerous things.ideally im playing one note, low c .physically im playing the first seven notes of the harmonic series.and im telling my brain that this is how much i have to forgive the western tuning system.implying the ideal ,the actual, and the entropy within the system.i get what monk is saying but its still the piano.sacrifice harmonic accuracy for virtual freedom=cultic art.picasso did this.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Yes, of course a frequency analysis of a low c played on a piano would yield the first seven notes of the harmonic series. A note is implied if it is not directly played by the musician, so even though it's clear to Monk it's still implied (directly played = key pressed down). From a perspective of harmony it would seem to me that really any chord (played on a piano) containing a C for example could be implied by a C since they contain the frequencies of C played on the piano.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Part 2:
Monk doesn't sacrifice harmonic accuracy as he does not tell us what is intended. Accuracy has no meaning if there is no known target :)
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu im saying cultic art is that part of culture which occurs frequent enough in your mind to make you pursue it,want it ,need it.picasso did this with the lines of the bull.i remember him explaing his facination with this .if theres a recording of monk explaining THIS i'd love to see/hear it.maybe he made some dissonant stuff as easy as possible to dig!what would this type dissonance sound like IDEALLY in tune with the harm. series?
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
You're making no sense whatsoever. I read an old comment of yours: see Part 2
rbnlenin 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ohmphthschwrhu
Part 2:
"how you gonna tell me to punc n spell right? i just broke the world record with most consonants between 2 muufuckin vowels? ohmphthschwrhu! and you can pronounce every consonant though you might bite your tongue.but just say i'm shrewd , silent d. ;D oops loud d ;( oops ghost d , .. . . . . . . ;D . i dont inend to spell right until i at least can use 3 fangurs to diddy bop/type. putting both hands up on the key board hurts my back."
Continued in Part 3.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Poorly made comments may come back haunt you, don't make a fool of yourself.
I say this not to be rude but rather to warn that others may not be as tolerant as I am.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu Part 2:
The way I see it, Monk implies interesting harmonic ideas that the advanced ear can hear but even if you don't have that you'll dig it because of the simplicity. It's a bit like higher mathematics, simple equations but yet so difficult for the uninitiated.
Oh by the way, you can find the quote in the documentary Straight No Chaser. Also I would like to express my contempt for Youtube's commentary system, it's clearly not made for intelligent discussion.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@rbnlenin i saw straight no chaser 20yrs ago.even if the advanced ear can hear it.its still dissonant against a hill of forgiveness because of tuning.we forgive wine for not tasting like juice.this is cultic effect.higher mathematics,complex and simple are fine in the mind but becomes so so flawed when brought into this world.unintitiated, unculterated yes!because what is raga?don't know.why is picasso painting like a first grader?dont know.can monk really play a piano???uninitiated.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
You may want to take a course in English or write while not intoxicated. By the way; raga literally means colour in Sanskrit.
Mathematics cannot be flawed since it requires proof and in fact mathematics only really exists in it's unambiguous written form. If it's ambiguous then it's not mathematics.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@rbnlenin i have a book called 'harmonic experience' the auther dedicated this book to pandit pran nath,an indian raga player.just type in indian raga music on youtube and you'll see.it may mean colour but just type in indian raga music.mathematics in its unambiguos form is an ideal. when you apply it to this physical world .if you think its nonsense fine im not offended.if you are then thats you're at.also i was nt talking about monk i was talking about the equal tempered scale
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
I do know what Raga-based music is, a raga is simply a mode. A scale upon which a melody is formed according to several other rules. It is also the basis for modal jazz.
There is no such thing as ambiguous mathematics, only poor mathematicians.
End of part 1.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
The equal tempered scale is not entirely accurate for every key I know, but tuning the instrument for every key may be a bit tedious and inflexible.
When analysing music one must be careful not to involve spirituality as a means of explanation. I'm going to take a look at that book, sounds interesting :)
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@rbnlenin look get this book and you'll get what im saying.the equal tempered scale is WAY! worse than you think.this book shows dydemic commas,pythagorean commas,the diesis comma,the diaschisma comma etc..its gives full examples throughout.it cost me $45 bucks u.s. .its too much to explain. its the best theory ever. absolutely worth it.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
I'll do it on one condition, that you write a bit more eloquent comments.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu IMAGINE.god takes 2 poles and anchors them in space .he takes an infinite guitar string and ties it to the poles and pulls the string tight .he plucks the string and this world comes into existence.do you see the big bang/big crunch dynamic in this proverbial string?shall i call hydrogen my fundamental tone?helium my duplicator?carbon my triplicator etc.if what you believe makes you dogmatic fine but you can disbelieve it at anytime.especially if you're young.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Why especially if you're young? Interesting creation myth there, I like that one where God creates the universe as a celestial quiche lorraine.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@rbnlenin resilience..so what happens when you mix spirituality and jazz.
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Part 1:
I have no problem with mixing spirituality and jazz. What I do have a problem with though is non-objectiveness in the analysis of the music because otherwise it's not a scientific analysis. In my opinion musicology should strive to be a science (social science) and therefore not include subjective values in the analysis of music.
rbnlenin 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
Part 2:
Of course these subjective values cannot be completely eliminated but then that's why I wrote "strive to be". Spiritual and therefore subjective values have no place in music analysis unless it's regarded as a factor that is also analysed objectively (otherwise it would be difficult to analyse Coltrane's later works for example).
rbnlenin 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rbnlenin [The equal tempered scale is not entirely accurate for every key I know, but tuning the instrument for every key may be a bit tedious and inflexible] this was the point i was trying to get you to.we all sacrifice this acurracy for the freedom to play the same melody ,not so much harmony though,anywhere on 88.true accuracy is maximum rigid. its simply playing the harmonic series and those notes only. 30 available notes in 5 octaves.- cont. to prt 2
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu 30 notes available within 5 octaves.the more you deviate from this single series from a single string or node, the more entropy is added to the system and we haven't even gotten to common note ambiguiteis, comma caused ambiguities and a shitty(i love it cause i love art)tuning system YET, and im dealing with a roland phantom g6 compared to you fansy yamaha grand.stop being arrogant professor.'piratebay' the book.Up bubble now,hope i dont get the 'bends' whew! ;D;D
ohmphthschwrhu 1 week ago
@ohmphthschwrhu
It's 60 notes in 12 tone equal temperament system on 5 octaves actually. 12*5 = 60.
A short google-ing of the terms "common note ambiguity" (but I guess you're getting at enharmonics) and "comma caused ambiguity" leads to no relevant results, this could only be the case if those terms are rarely used in musicology or that are specific to that book of yours. Therefore it's not fair to assume that people will know those terms unless you express that you assume people have read it
rbnlenin 1 week ago
ahahaha "is this modal"
this is beyond being classified
dannybighair 1 year ago
@justinomorales Is this modal ? No it's harmonic and symphonic with often playing two halftones like B&C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@justinomorales Is this modal ?
No it's harmonic and symphonic with often playing two halftones like B&C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
@justinomorales Is this modal ?
No it's harmonic and symphonic with often playing two halftones like B&C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@justinomorales
Is this modal ?
No it's harmonic and symphonic with often playing two halftones like B&C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@justinomorales Is this modal ? No it's harmonic and symphonic with often playing two halftones like B and C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@justinomorales Is this modal ?
No it's harmonic and symphonic
with often playing two halftones like B and C together.
Littlewhitelephant 1 year ago
@justinomorales No, it's not modal. It's a bit blues-like.
BuckshotLaFunke 1 year ago
@justinomorales holy fuck shoot yourself in the head
SuperBlackMoth 1 year ago
@justinomorales whats that you said?
Gnomitolindo 1 year ago
oops! I meant to give it 5 stars
futboler454 4 years ago