Added: 2 years ago
From: Veloce3
Views: 10,653
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (118)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What about an automated homing device such as that used in smart bombs? We use lasers to guide smart munitions to the target and the missile or bomb homes in on the energy signature and attempts to hit the signature. IF there was a device inside the towers that a plane that had been wired to fly itself could target the plane would easily hit it's mark.

  • besure to ask John Lear about his hollow earth theory

  • Guided missles-end of story!

  • ANY PILOT will tell you, after looking at any 911 WTC plane crash clip, that it is NOT A REALISTIC DEPICTION....

  • @2Xyousee

    any pilot? that's your argument from incredulity?

  • is this the John Lear who said the moon landings were fake. Look up John Lear :Interview Transcripts. Holy Crap someone earlier said this guy was a loon.that is an understatement. He presents a good presentation as he speaks with sarcastic wit and the totally unbiased videographer laughs with him at the totally riduculous thought that a plane hit anything. Just look.do you really think the planes are cartoons, the people jumping are dummies. Why not honor the dead instead say never existed.

  • To the debunkers: ALL you need to do to al least provide SOME proof for the official Flight 175-story is to show how you control a 767 into a target as a WTC tower - at 570mph at sea level!

    Another way to support todays modern religion of "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" is to provide some evidence to Atta and al-Shehhi actually were behind the controls of those craft.

    I don't hope that Lear subscribes to WTC no-plane theories, cause that is total BS!

    Here's interesting info: watch?v=5XPEz0d1rWI

  • anybody that believes a plane crashed at shanksville is totally gullable in fact anybody believes that a buch of arabs did 911 is a sheeple

  • When CNN announced they found the Arab's passport in the rubble I felt the whole thing was a lie, an obvious set up to spread hatred and fear. They really "jumped the shark" on that on. Imbecils. Thank you John.

  • @3e4r5t6f7h8i90 couldn't find a desk or a chair but found rings and bracelets... I'm sorry... no they didn't

  • @yikesoyikes1 huh?

  • @yikesoyikes1 inside joke! You are obvious and fool no one. Did you find the rings and bracelet on a cross? Duh

  • @3e4r5t6f7h8i90 I have no idea what you are talking about. As to the video..this guy is a total fool...sounds good here but look into him a tad and you will seewhat an idiot he is. He makes statements as to how a panel could be found...the panel was probably sheared off against a col. This guy is just really a joke and another joke is that THIS is the evidence for the truth movement. You believe this b.s. but you don't believe the 10 of 1000's of witnesses who actually saw.

  • @yikesoyikes1 TROLL. All you do is surf 911 videos and make comments that make no sense, derail, obfuscate. Waste of time. Later

  • @3e4r5t6f7h8i90 by tyroll do you mean look at these videos and read the totally lack of proof statements that truth guys say...then..yeah..you got me. Look at some of the things this guy has supported in the past..if this guy came to your house and started explaining all the things he supported you'd call a hospital. Derail? as in point out that the guy is a goof...ya got me again

  • @yikesoyikes1 Don't know what's going on here but I did not write this

  • My big problem is him saying that you couldn't remote fly a 767. The Air Force had a plane just shy of that size they flew routinely by remote back and forth to Australia.

  • Has anyone given any thought as to how much John might have been paid to say totally outrageous claims to make these topics seem insane? Look at his background with the government.

  • @Bramak17 oh yeah..look at it...not so good

  • On March 3 1991, United Flight 585, a 737, crashed near Colorado Springs, Colorado. The wreckage was found in a 10 foot deep hole. As for the clacking...ear plugs, head phones to block the noise.

  • @jorchs83 i wonder if there is a difference between the imprint left by a plane crashing into the solid ground & one crashing into a building. yet, United Flight 585, a 737 did leave a lot of debris.

  • John Lear has been proven and proven again to be a liar. John Lear is an utter comedian.

  • @AgentPepsi1 : Really?......I'd be happy for you to show that "Proof" OR when you say it has been "proven" do you really mean that you have been told it so by someone, perhaps mainstream media and have succumbed to your indoctrination. However, any time that you want to prove your statement, feel free to drop by. I mean you don't want to make yourself look like an idiot do you? ;-)

  • John Lear

    Your father would be embarassed beyond belief!!!

    You are a Joke to aviation!!

  • What a complete jackass! Tell that to all the people that lost their lovedones in the atttacks on 911! Fuck you "truthers" you are a bunch of absolute idiots, I cant beleive you pieces of shit are breathing after believing an asshole like this!!

  • @cganz1234 : Sadly those challenged individuals lacking in any intelligence use the type of comments that you have made. "The people that lost their loved ones" is EXACTLY the reason why the "Official" Government conspiracy theory(if it not a theory , where is the PROOF) is being questioned. Most if not all of the "Truth Movements" have FAMILY members of the VICTIMS. You my friend are an idiot , get back back yo your tv, chips and coke and keep quiet.

  • @Veloce3 Hes Talking about families of those who died in the PLANE not Building

  • @cganz1234 well fuck you sir. People are demanding the truth about what happened to their ''lovedones'' because they don't believe that stupid commision. Who the fuck are you to tell truthers to fuck off huh? You work for the gov or something?? Do you believe everything you hear by the mass media? I say FUCK YOU ignorant bitches who dont demand the truth

  • @cganz1234 do not respond from your emotions. respond from rational thinking. yes it's sad they died but look at the data THEN decide who is to blame.

  • @cganz1234 this guy knows his stuff you don't

  • @cganz1234 Hey, dickwad, go eat a cia dick. FUCK YOU. MY FUCKING COUSIN LOST HER STEPFATHER ON ONE OF THOSE PLANES. HOW BOUT SOME TRUTH FOR THOSE PEOPLE, FUCKFACE. HOW BOUT YOU STOP FUCKING BEING A TOOL FOR THE FUCKING ASSHOLES WHO KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE, SHIT FOR BRAINS.

  • I have one question that I would love to have answered by someone who thinks 9/11 was a hoax.....What is the minimal # of people that could have pulled this off?.And, the minimal # of people that could have known?...

  • Lear is actually the 3rd EX CIA agent to say 9/11 wasnt done by Bin Laden.

    I know of 2 others (one is in a video on YT with Dan Rather)

    Plus Morgan Reynolds was actually in the Bush administration and he went on Fox News and said 9/11 was an inside job__FACT

    How much more proof do the sheeple need? Too many Americans are so blind and stupid

  • @buffboynick Besides helping interviewees blow the whistle on 9/11, Dan Rather also nailed Bush Jr. on his bogus military record. So of course the Bush people then trumped up some fake charges and got Rather fired. He couldn't fight it because he knew their next move would be to kill him and call it an accident, which is their usual MO.

  • @themredweirdoshow

    Yes, and the CIA apparently cant control their own agents.

    Either that or the CIA agents that have said 9/11 was done by shadow ops in the American government are "controlled opposition"

    3 different agents and a Bush administration official now. Something strange is going on......

  • @buffboynick In his early videos done shortly before he died in very late 2001, bin Laden indicated that he applauded what happened with the WTC disaster, but never said he did it. But yet Bush Jr. later lied anyway that "bib Laden claimed full credit for it." Just saying that one is happy because something bad happened in the US? That would have to include more than half of the middle east!

  • @themredweirdoshow

    Yeah that true.

    Bin Laden was a bad guy but not sophisticated enough to pull off the 9/11 attacks

    Not to mention......the 9/11 attacks were a totally different MO then Al-Qaeda uses.

    Al-Qaueda uses truck bombs and car bombs. They (nor anyone) could line a plane up with a ground level target like the Pentagon.

    It appears a missile hit the Pentagon. Smells like CIA to me.

  • @buffboynick The "missile" concept sounds close, but a more apt description would be remote-controlled drone planes, with nobody onboard. The passengers for those flights were no doubt first offloaded and remain in underground prisons to this day.

  • @themredweirdoshow

    I have heard many theories on how they did it, but the way they did it doesnt matter.

    It was definitely an inside job and that's what all people need to know.

    I did hear many eye-witnessess said they saw a missile hit the Pentagon though. That particular theory seems to be correct.

  • @buffboynick An empty drone plane probably WOULD look like a missile. But they did have engines in them, to make them seem to be legit. Problem is that, as Lear pointed out, at least one of them had the wrong dang engine for the type of plane it was supposed to be. Just like with the fake 'Bama birth certificate, these gubmint boys sure are SLOPPY!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It's time to see some accountability from the US government!

    Thanks to John Lear for his professional opinion!

  • I have video of him telling Art Bell about why JFK was assasinated on my page. Worth a look if you like getting a little freaked out.

  • wow,sounds like 'klackers' are needed for people that think this wasnt an inside job.

  • is that a ghost in his house when a red rectangle appears on his wall

  • His lips are not in synch with the words coming out of his mouth,

  • @andrewwilliams76 he is going to talk about godzilla

  • whats his motive? no motive! anyone with three brain cells knows 9/11 was an inside job. Holograms all the way, no real planes. lots of footage proving it.

  • there is not much 1 can do w/ this info, however I am grateful to at least be privy to the distinct possibility he presents here. I do NOT trust any of 9/11 because none of it adds up...none of it. 1 thing I do know is that innocent people died that day! (they should not have!)

  • -Airliner #175 reported by Jew/TV-media to have crashed into one of Twin-towers is, --wooops shown still flying, via its transponder-info., and subsequently landed normally; -so what did Jew-faction of FBI do to shut all of these people up from squealing on our jewZionist=gov'mt..? Were passengers & crew simply deboarded, shuttled into a sealed-room, and murdered-enmasse, --their butchered-remains sent to next of kin?

  • @AryanKnight

    I know! Geez, how many Jews with dual citizenship are working in high-level positions in the current admin?

    Something like 119? It's unbelievable. Apart from the fact that these Jews believe they are God's chosen people (bullshit), they don't give a rat's ass about the USA or its people. Think about it!!

    John Lear is an amazing guy. His dad was the inventor of the Lear Jet. He was a combat and test pilot. The guy has more guts in his little toe than 99.99% of people.

  • @saturnx311 ...have in their whole bodies.

    When he speaks he speaks the truth. He has no reason not to. He is NOBODY'S BITCH.

  • I want to see all involved come to justice.

  • search 9/11 missing wing

  • Why isnt john lear on Hannity & Colmes or O'Reily? I want to see them call him a tin hat wearin, cons. theoirist..He is the man.. Wish Howard Huews was still alive, to see what he has to say about four plane wreckes, with NO WRECKAGE!! or plane wings going throw STeel colums(2'x 18") at 800ft. altitude..Insane to beleive govt story.. plus stole planes with Boxcutters..LOL

  • The one thing that he doesn't explain is that if airplanes DID NOT hit the twin towers than what footage was it that we saw??? And what about all the civilians in the street saying they saw a plane fly and hit the towers? Anyone?

  • John Lear is a legend and truthteller

    Nuff said

  • @buffboynick He's one a hell of a story teller.....

  • John Lear is full of sh*t. I have a video (VHS) where Mr. Lear claims Osama Bin Laden was his CIA contact. The video is from the 1990's! John Lear is Mr. Disinformation.

  • I'll think you'll find , if you were to do some thorough research that OBL was and probably still is a CIA Agent

  • You might be right, I don't know. But John Lear is still a disinformation specialist. Why would Mr. Lear even have a CIA contact from another country? He spreads it thick as butter but it smells of fish.

  • Are you aware of JL,s background and that of his Father. What source are you using to suggest that he is a "Disinfo Specialist".........is it based on fact or hearsay.....I have a suspicion that you may have succumbed to some propaganda!

  • Yes, I am aware of his dad and his work, which makes him a perfect candidate for a disintel specialist. I am, however, only stating my opinion as no one can prove anyone is a disintel person. If you look at his videos you will see that Mr. Lear says some pretty outrageous things. Why? He's trying to appeal to the conspiracy/UFO nuts.Why isn't he on CNN or any major news source? He's interviewed by loonies like George Noory. He hangs around with Bob Lazar and looks for alien space ships!

  • Wow, I wish you could really see the content of your comment. I think that your conditioning has been so intensive that you aren't fully aware of your self. Are you saying that CNN and major media channels are legitimate and are abundant in their morals and ethics. In addition , if YOU aren't able to "prove" what you are saying, about a relatively serious subject wouldn't you want some substance to back up your opinion or is hearsay and propaganda good enough for you .....................

  • It's good enough for John Lear! FYI, I don't believe the governments story about 911. I think having non credible people like John Lear only hurts any investigation into the truth. I have seen many John Lear videos, you don't need to prove he's a nut, just watch. It's obvious. Many people have offered legitimate proof that 911 was a fraud. But nuts like Lear make the issue lose credibility. That's what disintel does.

  • I disagree,I think your logic is faulty. Again , you have used comments like "you don't need any prove hes a nut just watch".which has no logical content at all. From reading your comments, I think, that you need to question the legitimacy of the mainstream information that you receive. You clearly have a reliance on that medium and by doing so you'll find that your comments are imbalanced and distorted. I guess we are all entitled to our opinion no matter how wacky and manufactured they may be!

  • I respect your opinion. Unfortunately 500 characters simply isn't enough space to make the proof you wish. I recommend you seek out some of John Lear's older videos and try to watch them with an open mind instead of as a believer. He has no credibility with the mainstream news media for a good reason. Mr. Lear does a good job of spreading disinformation. It's up to you to seek the truth. As far as 911, we may be on the same side.

  • There you go again about the "mainstream media".......Please go do some research, find out as to whom owns the monopoly that is the "mainstream media". sadly your opinions and thoughts are entirely discredited when you try to use the "mainstream media" as credible leverage. You just need to research.Good luck

  • You're making far too many assumptions about me. I know the role of the mainstream media. I also know the role of hype media, like John Lear. I've done the research. I have dozens of videos with John Lear on them. There is no doubt he is a disintel guy. there are two kinds of disintel, one on mainstream media and the other on hype media. Mainstream media produced the lies about 911 that have become the accepted story.

  • ...continued. Mr. Lear is muddying the waters by spreading his disinformation in order to get people to believe the mainstream medias story. Most people will read his nonsense and disagree with him and use it as support for the accepted belief. Do you understand what I'm saying? He's the other kind of disintel.

  • "He has no credibility with the mainstream news media for a good reason"

    This is what you said.........The above statement suggests to me that you think that the MM are legitimate....correct me if I'm wrong?

  • Apparently I am not doing a good job of explaining this. I'm too limited by space. Mainstream media is legitimate relative to some stories but they are also in charge of social programming. Most stories on CNN, ABC etc. are true. Some are not. They are always biased. Mainstream media uses people with public credibility. Hype media like Coast to coast AM use the others like Mr. Lear. Both forms of media spread disinformation. They do it differently. Continued...

  • ...Continued. Mainstream media sends us news that is for the most part believable by the general public. But, they also hide important truths. Ever hear how George Bush's grandfather funded Hitlers rise to power? It's true, but only back page news on mainstream media. Did you notice how gas prices dropped dramatically after Bush conceded to Obama? Not on CNN. But things that are obviously truthful are always reported.

  • Of course anyone who is awake and conversant with Political history is fully aware of Prescott Bush and what his politics were.I agree with you in part. The MM are responsible for social conditioning, for the dumbing down on society in general ensuring that information of any importance that has the potential to disrupt the status quo is kept out of the public forum. In addition it's simply a tool for the Elite to control the masses and disengage those that want to expose the truth from society

  • Actually, most people don't know of Mr. Bush's exploits. It's been back paged. I agree with your other statement. This may surprise you, I used to be a news reporter on the radio. There were stories I was required to report on that I didn't want to and stories I wanted to report on I wasn't allowed. They were all legitimate stories that came on the news wire from AP but my hands were tied. There was certainly social programming happening on my station!

  • @Veloce3 In all fairness it doesn't take much to dumb down the American public, even the "truth movement" is just a weekend club to join, put on a black t-shirt and act like their "waking people up". It will never work just like bringing JFK's killers to justice, you can't convince the power elite to convict themselves.

  • @SensibleStan : I agree. For me, people in general with average intelligence have the capacity to differentiate fact from fiction.It's simply a question as to whether they are motivated to do anything about it and the answer to that is categorically, NO, at this point. They are kept in an environment where survival and servitude at at the forefront of their existence and counteracts any desire to upset the status quo. Although, I do think we will see a significant upheaval in the coming years.

  • @rasputinslovechild how is he disinfo?

  • xur- hahah hitting a specific part of the landing strip at 500+mph.........now whose the laughable idiot.....

    Go do some serious research and you'll limit the amount of ridiculous statements that you make as you have demonstrated very clearly......

  • There's no way to prove at this date the engine found wasn't authentic, or the alleged GE engine could have been from a one-off UA special order. Also, a landing wheel was found. Hundreds or thousands of witnesses saw WTC 2 impact, vids and film recorded it. The no-plane theory is disinfo to discredit 911 Truth. The 500+ knot speeds are likely in error, but that doesn't invalidate proof of crash. I don't think the Pa scene was necessarily legit. The Pentagon crash is still suspect IMO.

  • I don't get it: why should it be impossible that these airplanes crashed into WTC??

    All the videos, all the whitnesses, wrong? No, this guy is wrong.

  • In 1996 Bob Lazar said this of his friend John Lear: "Well, John Lear's a nice guy. I like him, but he does have the tendency to add about fifteen percent color to stories, and if a story goes through him twice, it's thirty percent, and it doesn't stop."

    In other words he has a penchant for exaggeration.

  • The towers disintegrated, pulverized....this is not normal for abuyilding that shouldn't collaps in the first place. The people responsible have a enormes disrespect and contempt for the US citizens. They do not even bother to plant the right plane-engine on the streets. They are arrogant and say.....we do as we please with you, whenever we want and where we want.

  • So you hear something that's obviously wrong and parrot it out to the masses. That's really intelligent of you.

  • Well, obviously I am not that intelligent because I do not understand your comment.

  • 'nuff said.

  • Yeah..thanks, we need more people like you.

  • Do I really need to explain it? The jet engine found in the street was the right one - not planted. If you think it was planted, tell me by whom and where's the paper trail?

    The Empire State building was hit by a B25 but didn't collapse, its design is completely different to the WTC towers. Two towers, built the same, hit by similar aircraft. Of course there's a massive chance they'd collapse the same. The second tower hit was first to fall - more floors (weight) above. Ignore that one.

  • mrolly- "A massive chance that they'd collapse the same".....oh really and your evaluation of this "chance" was studied/quantified and peer reviewed where?

    It appears to me that the official line supporters make the wackiest if statements without needing any verifiable data to back up there claims....nut jobs!

  • It can be quantified by Newton's 2nd and 3rd laws of motion including Einstein's theory of relativity. However, the law of averages never applies here.

    Do I really have to explain this to you? [sigh]..

    Smash 2 similar loaded trains into 2 similar trucks. Detonate similar explosives at similar walls twice. Hit a cue ball the same way twice. Mathematically an 85% chance the outcomes would be very similar. You try to bunk me without explaining anything yourself. Typical twoofer.

  • Mathematically an 85% chance says you or an Expert??.....Please indicate as to which "Expert" has verified you statement....Thanks

    Typical nut job........spouting rubbish.........No verifiable data needed for them....they just have to be told by "Authority" and they comply....(sigh)

  • Says probability theory (simpler than relativity).

    The probability you roll a 6 from a die is 1/6 from one roll. This doesn't change significantly over many rolls. However, there's only 6 dimensions.

    Add the thousands of dimensions from the towers. Their bolts & beams, furniture, construction etc. & aircraft. All vary by little. The only SIGNIFICANT change is the second tower hit falls first due to more floors & weight above. Math I can't write here as I don't have the special characters

  • Now let's look at your precious thermite theory. Originally changed from explosives as no loud detonations were heard when the buildings collapsed. However, normal thermite proven to burn too slow for the rapid collapse. Changed to nano-thermite, which was proven very difficult to manufacture in large quantities in 2002.

    In any case, if you believe explosives or thermite, the collapse was the same for both towers. YOU explain it now.

  • I wonder what weird wack job theory numbers you'll come up with for the demolition of Building 7????

    Do some research and try to reverse your obvious indoctrination into the propoganda

  • O.k. of course planes hit the towers. Everyone that day says so, but pilots will also say that it is extremely difficult (if not impossible) to hit those bldgs at that speed.

    Bush & co. were white collar criminals before he even got into office. Com'n 9/11 is a no brainer. When a steel framed building falls after minor damage (bldg. 7) in the same manner of a controlled demolition, you have fowl play. 9/11 was done by a few assholes, but it doesn't mean our entire country is bad. Just accept it

  • I just cannot vadem John Lear......But when he says that a Boeing 767-200 is not remote controleable anyway I think he is either a lier and trying very hard to convince the public or just he doesn't know his stuff. Because every commercial airliner is remote controllable. And this dead centre flying just a piece of cake once you have a fix on the target. And I should know because I just do.

  • Oh I get it now, he's just a wacky no planer lol, funny. This guy is as nutty as they get. I sure hope that nobody actually takes this guy seriously. If you do then you need to STOP SNIFFING SO MUCH GLUE!!!!

  • Why would he make them hit the center of the bldg (2:50) when even the hijacked plane didn't hit the center? This guy is on CRACK! Wow, I can't believe he even got interviewed for this crap. Must have been a slow news day.

  • Excellent thanks for your input jeffmay.......Can you just elaborate on your credentials and Piloting experience, then we can all be assured that you are speaking from a degree of expertise and not just one of these ignorant types that believes everything you hear on the TV...Cheers

  • You don't need piloting experience, just eyes and ears. Do you have those? Thousands of people watched those planes hit the towers with their own eyes. You want me to believe that this one single quack is more credible than the thousands that watched the planes crash? You think this guy is somehow more credible than all the firefighters that watched the planes crash into the towers with their own eyes? The very firefighters that lost hundreds of their best friends that day? Try again!

  • Jeff- "Just eyes and ears".....Thats OK Jeff, in your simple life I guess that IS all you need....Good luck with that.........It's very sad!

  • i'm undecided but i don't think he is disinfo.

  • He's a fucking idiot - his only claim to fame is his name.

  • i never thought John was disinfo. He ALWAYS said he just tells what he believes.

  • @burninbushmen

    You're right.....I think Lear is 100% real, has no pro-government agenda, and is one heck of a GREAT man.

    I am still shocked he hasnt been killed by government agents yet. Although.....they cant just go around killing everyone that exposes them so maybe thats why he is still breathing.

    He make some other interesting observations as well.

  • @burninbushmen,

    I don't think Lear himself realizes he is spreading Disinfo. His only interest is getting on TV and getting publicity for himself. Just look at the Penn & Teller Bullshit Episode with John Lear...

    Look into the No-Plane theory a little harder. It's a dead-end investigation which blames no one and gets you no closer to finding the real truth or the people behind 9/11...

    If they faked the planes hitting the towers... why not fake a plane hitting the Pentagon too? It makes no sense

  • @burninbushmen Why don't you research John Lear? I did. And I believe he is totally sincere.

    He is talking about a 767-200's ability to fly at SEA LEVEL. It wouls shake apart. The airframe is not designed to handle that thick air at speed.

  • I'm afraid that John Lear is a disinformation agent for the CIA.

  • kil- I think you miss the point.....I don't think anyone in the "truth" movement has ever professed to having ALL the answers....It is about finding out the answers to ALL of the unanswered questions, of which there are hundreds...

    The only people that profess to know all the answers is your Government and their official conspiracy theory...If after fully researching what they've told you, you are happy with that...then go live your life and leave others to find the answers.....its very simple

  • Very good! Very powerful!

    I'm glad he discussed the engine found on Murray St. Wrong manufacture, eh?! Go figure!

    BTW, what date was the interview? Sometime after January, 2008, I guess.

  • Thanks for your comments...I agree with you....

    Yes, I believe it was around that time. There are of course more extensive videos of JL. His background and experience make him an extremely credible contributor.

  • yep, it was in Las Vegas, April 2008, an interview (maybe 4 hours long!!!) for project camelot.

    btw it's quite interesting!

    uh... yep, i found it!

    watch?v=pj-HzHi3dF0 (part 1)

  • WOW this video is fantastic but it ends abruptly! What happened next?

  • Help me out. Why did you outline whatever is on the mantle of the fireplace behind Mr. Lear? At about 1:15? Thanks.

  • Never noticed before...Thanks

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more