Hitler's economic policies were centrist and were more Keynesian. His social policies were very much far to the right. The Nazis or the National Socialists as what they were referred to as were in fact all over the place because they were talking about a classless society. Hitler was an authoritarian but economically was centrist. I would call him a Fascist but Far-Right only on his social policies and not his economic policies. His social policies were similar to Stalin, who was far left
@williambrazzers. Then you didn't really comprehend what you read. God knows I'm not one to defend either of these broads, but much like all political discussions they are both right and both wrong.
generally indifferent to their position on the left-right spectrum, as being a conclusion of their combination of views rather than an objective, and considering it insignificant to their basis of their views that they claimed could just as easily be associated with "the mountain of the center" as with the right.[28] There is a running dispute among scholars about where along the left/right spectrum that fascism resides.[29][30][31][32]
You know I see a lot of comments on here saying Naziism was "right wing." No it was NOT. It was a very revolutionary idea, not reactionary. So stop referring to it as something it was not.
Ann Coulter is a professional political commentator and she doesn't understand that Hitler was a a right-wing extremist.....that is ridiculous, this is basic politics it's the first thing you learn in a politics class....political spectrum, Hitler was extreme right while Stalin was extreme left how is this not understood??
@cormiecamby Conservatives understand history even less than they understand law. In their minds, anyone bad is automatically extreme left, regardless of their actual politics.
@TheJazuma - Yeah...first you would hit it from the extreme left then from the extreme right....OMG...can you say....ICE CREME SANDWICH......then slapping them both on the Azz while scream.....Who's ya Dick-Tator, Who's ya Dick-Tator. Yeah....that would be good....but I can help but wonder if my money shot would be taxed by the inch or by the inch or by the ounce.....yeah....a threesome with both of them would be hot.......
@TheBeatSmith "taxed by the inch", fuck, that's funny lols. You're fucking funny lols. Happy New Years. hey can you tell me why @2:51 of Rihanna's S&M music video, it says "Princess of the Illuminati"? Man 2012 is gonna be a rocker...that is if the Big Ben gets bombed either during the Games or sometime after. I mean, the stadium has triangular illuminati looking lights...maybe steven jackson was onto something when he made those illuminati game cards...
Yes,Reincouturia, its just the stupid in you. If there was any comparison,which there isn`t ,because there are few people on earth as mean and vitriolic as Andy Coulter, why would you go right to color as opposed to ideology. I guess I`m "playing the race card" by pointing this out to you.
And talk about revisionist history.... You're making an outstanding assumption about the democratic parties motives. Now why should I accept your argument if you refuse to even recognize mine?
Yet another liberal trying to say the right wing is racist... if they only knew the facts about which party actually helped out most with civil rights.
@theultimaterockr here we go again... why don't you go ahead and google "southern strategy"... then you'll realize who REALLY helped civil rights get off the ground. this is a disturbing trend i see on the internet. republicans who seem to think that their party (as it is today) would have supported civil rights. You are DEAD wrong. Liberal ideology passed civil rights. Republicans and Democrats "switched" sides because of voting trends in the south. go ahead, look it up, i can wait.
@theultimaterockr here we go again... why don't you go ahead and google "southern strategy"... then you'll realize who REALLY helped civil rights get off the ground. this is a disturbing trend i see on the internet. republicans who seem to think that their party (as it is today) would have supported civil rights. You are DEAD wrong. Liberal ideology passed civil rights. Republicans and Democrats "switched" sides because of voting trends in the south. go ahead, look it up, i can wait.
@underlinedbluetext I know all about what you're talking about dude BUT they never really "switched" The thing is that Democrats had always fed off of the emotions of the average white racist & then later on switched & decided to start feeding off of the emotions of minorities & union workers. The thing is that the Repubs never became like Democrats use to be & never will. They are usually conservative in their values and try to hold themselves to a higher moral standard. Not all do but they try
@underlinedbluetext watch the video called " The Racist History of the Republican Party " by user mcdonalsuny or Examining Black Loyalty to Democrats by machosauceproduction If you want facts watch those two and get back to me. Especially the second one
@underlinedbluetext MLK became a registered Republican in 1956... Booker T Washington? What party freed the slaves and passed the 13,14 and 15th amendments, the Enforcement Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, George H.W. Bush's 1991 Civil Rights Act ? Teddy Roosevelt outlawed segregation in NY schools when he became governor in 1900. Eisenhower passed the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Act proposed by Repubs. What party was CREATED to FIGHT AGAINST SLAVERY? Open up a history book!
@theultimaterockr What don't you understand? I'm telling you that the north and the south "switched" parties a long time ago. Do you really believe that all "republicans" moved south... and all "democrats" moved north? Thats absurd! I'm not all modern republicans are "anti civil rights"... but they certainly would not have been in favor of it in the 1950's. YOU need to open a history book. Party lines have changed dramatically over time!
@underlinedbluetext I have to thoroughly disagree with what I think you're saying. The idea that the parties have changed sides is kind of crazy and it was created by revisionist historians. It's based on the idea that the "Southern Strategy" somehow changed who voted for who. Yeah people moved from party to party. Yellow Dog Dems stayed Dems. The fact is that later on Dems decided they actually cared about minorities and their rights and they felt bad for what they had done. ...
@underlinedbluetext ... You see the Democrat Party has only been consistent on one thing and that was feeding off of the public's emotions. They use to feed off of the emotions of the racist white people and now they don't want to look bad for their constant discrimination so they now try to feed off the emotions of every single minority whether it be race or sexual orientation.
@theultimaterockr damn this comment system. anyways. i think the argument we're having here has changed...
So are you sticking to your guns on this? You really believe that liberals aren't the ones who championed civil rights? Because... thats what you originally said. And that, factually, is just not correct.
@theultimaterockr AND!... Political parties feeding off of peoples emotions?!? I've never heard of such a thing! ... Surely you don't believe that only one side is guilty of that tactic... do you? I mean... we're in Iraq BECAUSE of emotions, because of knee jerk reactions. Yes, a lot of dems supported that. But that doesn't change the fact that emotions are a great way to push your agenda forward. Both sides are "guilty" of this, on so many levels.
@underlinedbluetext I know we're in Iraq for that reason and I don't agree with it either. I'm not saying both parties don't do it. I'm saying that Dems use race and sex orientation to get votes. The fact is that Dems use things like the race card so so often that it makes them look like the little boy who cried racist. The best way to attract attention away from your own failure is to start calling other people names. I just gets ridiculous ya know?
@theultimaterockr Right. but again... the other side uses the same type of self-victimization... emotional appeals. I often hear conservatives say "oh i suppose that makes me racist" or you hear them bring up the race card.... even when it's just a matter of race, not racism. I don't know many racist republicans, I'm sure they exist. But for the most part, republicans aren't racist! But for some reason... they'll jump at any chance to bring the 'race card' factor into an argument.
@theultimaterockr and believe me, I'm fucking tired of it too. I'm tired of the right left thing... I'm tired of the blame game. All I want is a cohesive and logical national discussion. I've never seen it once... and doubt I ever will. We have to recognize race as a factor in all of this just like we have to figure in religion as well.
We can argue back and forth all day. I just took exception to your original comment... and now I feel like that has been reconciled. Have a good one!
@underlinedbluetext Yeah I suppose we could keep arguing. I just hate that Republicans get no credit for anything or the truth gets twisted about them. It's an annoyance ya know? George Washington thought there shouldn't be political parties because he thought it would separate people and I guess he was right. Have a great day to you too sir!
@theultimaterockr ... have you seen my comment on your profile from two weeks ago? right there is a perfect example of someone being irrational. lol Sorry about that.
I think it's hilarious how Ann Coulter couldn't even say anything after Aisha was finished talking...she got showed up by a (very educated and poised) Comedian in something that she should already know about.
It's unfair to call fascism a right wing philosophy inside the subtext of American Left & right wing. Fascism is a European ideal, and if you really want to be fair - then you have to admit that the left & right wing in Europe is totally different than US politics. We are a republic in which fascism cannot exist. With further anylsis, since progressives want to ape the "utopian" societies of Europe, then both the European left & right wings would easily get along inside today's progressive camp!
This is why Nobody should be compared to Hitler. People get confused by what a country names it's type of government and try to lump everything that's called socialism under one definition. All countries have some sort of mixed economy. We have never seen true capitalism, socialism, or communism as defined by those who coined the terms. Hitler's state was totalitarian. Every totalitarian state is defined by the dictator who runs it and they all have their own ideas how things should be ran
Aisha Tyler is misleading and herself misunderstood of the National Socialism. Hitler was not a stupid leftwinger or a rightwinger or whatever. Hitler was not a fascist, but the founder and builder of National Socialism. Lastly, to the people who compare Obama to Hitler, "HOW DARE YOU COMPARE STUPID OBAMA TO HITLER?" Hitler was one of the greatest leaders of all time, and Obama has done nothing and he himself is nothing.
The oddity of black people bringing up Hitler is that unbeknown to most people, Hitler has very strong ties with the international Muslim community before and after the extermination program of Jews during World War II, while Obama also has strong religious and cultural ties with the international Muslim community. Yet, both Hitler and the Arab Muslims around the world abhors and loathes black people. The utter stupidity and ignorance of people is quite perplexing to me.
@Jollycoolwater Umm....are you joking? The only conspiracy I heard about Hilter was that he was funded by the Bush family, Wall Street and Zionist because they wanted Jews to leave Europe so they can form their secular, Jewish state?? Why did Muslims get added, I think Muslims were too busy being exploited and waiting for future exploitation of themselves and their land as the greed for money of the America and British swell up.
@KpopManiacSFL No, I'm not kidding. Youtube is at your finger tips. There are numerous video clips of meetings between Hitler and Grand Mufti Amin Al Husseini to plan out the extermination of Jews. They also created a division of Muslim SS officers. Key in "Hitler Muslim".
If you look at the party platform it is all about workers right to jobs, infringement on property rights. The common joke to say to someone on the left bad mouthing the Nazis is "Beside the racism and murder, what do you have against the Nazis" I don't agree with their platform but most Democratic party planks match up nicely. It's all about community and the individual is crap compared to the state.
Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
@justthefactsyouidiot The US and Europe seem to have somewhat different definitions of right and left. Hilter and Stalin were both statist - they agreed with state control just disagree on how it was applied much like our Democratic and Republican parties. In the US politcal spectrum Libertarianism is far right and shares many similar view points to anarchism - the exact opposite of statism. Mrs. Tyler sees only Democratic and Republican parties.
People say that all of the time and have no understanding of Fascism, socialism, or conservatism. Fascism, nazism, communism, socialism all ahev 1 glaring obvious similarity.... GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!
Conservatism is conservative spending on government, with less(not no, only less) regulations and an increase in personal responsibility and personal freedom. Libertarianism and anarchy are further right then conservatism.
People say that all of the time and have no understanding of Fascism, socialism, or conservatism. Fascism, nazism, communism, socialism all ahev 1 glaring obvious similarity.... GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!
Conservatism is conservative spending on government, with less(not no, only less) regulations and an increase in personal responsibility and personal freedom. Libertarianism and anarchy are further right then conservatism.
Aisha Tyler is the dumbest smart person I have ever seen. Her brain has been infected by liberalism . She is trying to make some ridiculous point about Hitler and casually has to re-write history and the English language to do it. Hitler was a right wing conservative ? I guess the marxist Lee Harvey Oswald was a right winger too.
Hitler was a socialist thug just like your jug-earred manchild Aisha. Accept it.
@Deadkurtrulz Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
I think Aisha Tyler is a smart, funny and beautiful women. But i have to say she doesnt know what the hell she is talking about.. SHe just simply has wrong info. Im sorry but it is what it is... Fascism deals with Dictatorship, Monarchy, econimic and social control fom the dictator..... That is the opposite of right wing ideology which deals with Democracy and SMALL Govt, Free market.. Where the hell did she get that from?
@bigstU25 Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
Fascism has been argued to have extreme influence from both sides, but traditionally is seen as extreme right. Look up policies of fascist governments and decide what you think. For help, fascist gov'ts include Mussolini (Italy), Nazism (Germany), Iron Guard (Romania), Falangism (Spain), Integralism (Brazil), Metaxas' 4th of August Regime (Greece), Imperial Rule Assistance Association (Japan), Estado Novo (Portugal), Fatherland Front (Austria), Kai-tsu p'ai faction of the Kuomintang (China)
Excerpt from Adolph Hitlers speech, as Germany's labor party leader, 01 May 1927.
"
We are socialists, we are enemies of todays capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.
@Rawrlor There's nothing conservative about German socialists and their liberal use of government force. In fact, the Nazi's domestic policy is entirely aligned with today's Liberal Dem'rats: * pro socialized medicine * pro Designer Babies (eugenics) * pro Gun Control * pro Protected Class laws * pro nanny-state governance * pro nationalizing industries * pro Public-Private Partnerships NAZI, DEMOCRAT -- tomato, tom-ahh-toe
i thought i've seen this white women some where before, this is JJ, from THE GOOD TIMES SHOWS GIRLFRIEND, she's high off j j big black dick & will say anything silly to stay in the game.
Ascubaguy any person with some education knows the 2 party's role have switched 200 years ago. The republicans was the northern liberal, the party of Abraham Lincoln but not anymore. You didn't mention these people in the republican party who was a segregationist or (KKK) member let me help you; Jesse helms, sen. Larry Craig, mills Godwin, trent lott, John Patterson, David duke (GOP) fritz hollings
All i hear is yet another black whining about subjects they have no comprehension of ever understanding. All this is, is black social liberation and justice. It has nothing to do with acting like an American, having a job, raising children or getting an education. It's all about how much they can milk the government out of mo' money instead of taking responsibility for their own lives. Let's see how far white guilt will last before it's all said and done with. Paul Ryan 2012!
@Seaworldexists Fascism? You are just using talk show talking point. You don't know anything about fascism and socialism. You don't know the difference between Hitler's, Mussolini's, Tojo's or Franco's fascism. Socialist Russia and Fascist Germany fought in world war 2, if they were the same why would they fight you idiot. Get back to me in ten years when you learn something you're still struck in the 3rd grade.
I dont even consider anyone but mussolini a fascist. Hitlers system was for one totalitarian and based on racial superiority and utopian anti-modernism. Do you even know anything about the volksgemeinschaft? Oh so the soviets and Nazis fought in WW2 anyone who fights each other must be ideological enemies?
You do realize that they had an alliance for 2 years and split up eastern europe. How about the Bourbons and the Habsburgs in the 17th and 18th century both absolute monarchies both somehow fought each other. Hitler wasnt a socialist but he was certainly not a conservative.
Good strategy by the way I ask you what the difference is between fascism and national socialism and you add some pathetic insults and expect me to explain the difference.
@Seaworldexists well, I answer the question but you still seems confuse. Fascism is a form of right wing totalitarianism, because they have risen in a relatively advanced society. Fascism grew out of the fear of socialism. That came out of Italy with Mussolini. That's the difference, socialism and fascism are not the same.
Lmao your such an idiot. Fascism in Italy has a lot to do with socialism. Mussolini was one of Italys most prominent socialists and just split with the party over ww1. They obviously are not the same. Hitler and mussolini themselves were very different. Lets look at hilters policies though a big nanny state (left wing), anti-free trade (left wing), keynesian economic policies (left wing). You really know no more than you were taught by brainwashed idiots.
@Seaworldexists Your are a pea brain, when you go to Italy and talk to the government. The first thing that they say " the most famous fascist was Italian dictator Benito Mussolini " I guess you know more than the Italian government. I can tell you are really an idiot. I would give you their email address but, they said no,they don't wanna talk to you it's a waste of time.
Could you point out where I denied that mussolini was a fascist? No you cant. Now you're fantasizing about talking with the italian government. Ask them who Mussolini worked for from 1908-1914. Mussolini until the first world war was an ardent socialist. Note I said he split with the party over the war. Fascism was very much an evolution from his early socialist beliefs.
@Seaworldexists Ok so my aunt is not married to someone in the Italian government for 15 years. I don't talk to my in-laws in Italy. Ok I got it, go take your medication. Something is wrong with you, not because you lie so much, makes everybody a liar.
Convenient to completely avoid the errors I raise with your perception of Mussolini as a right winger. And more importantly do you have any idea what Hitlers ideology involved? No.
If you ask the KKK or the skinheads, what party you voted for in the last election? They would say the republican or the conserative party. The republican party prey upon the fear of people or propaganda that's what the NAZI did with the German people The teabaggers should called themselves THE NAZIBAGGERS!!!
@withataman01 Who's the current DEMOCRAT senator who was formerly a high-ranking member of the KKK? Byrd? I might be wrong about the name of the guy, but I'm right about which party. Also - after segregation was abolished in our country, who came along and wanted to reinstitute it? A DEMOCRAT!
@ascubaguy Robert Byrd, a former Kleagle (recruiter) and Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, is a reminder of the Democrat's ugly history.
"I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds"
This is what most liberals are in this country, completely miseducated - never bothering to read books or even check the history channel. The indoctrinated class are so embarrassing. Does Aisha not know what N.A.Z.I. stands for? I'd also bet that she doesn't know the history of the Democrat Party; [KKK, Jim Crow, etc.] And also, Aisha - Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman and MLK were Republicans. My God educate yourself!
The Jews was under fascism,they would know the difference the between right wing party and a left wing party. 99% of Jews vote for the left wing party not the republican party
Aisha, although you are hot and try to speak a mile a minute so no one can tell you that your facts are wrong, you need to smarten up. Hitler was big gov't, anti religion, anti jew etc...these are liberal policies that we see even more now with Obama's hatred of Israel. Stick to comedy girl...
Dear Aisha, please do your homework. Hitler was big government and anti-religion. How that even remotely compares to the Republican party is a mystery to me.
i suggest some of you actually learn what words mean. i have a sneaking suspicion that "fascism" "right wing" "conservative" "left wing" don't mean what you seem to think they mean. you also might want to pick up a history book and open it up the the chapter about adolf hitler so you can possibly learn something and hopefully realize how completely moronic and clueless your words look when you post about things you don't understand. (hint: repeating ad nauseum fox news talking points = failure)
@secon maybe you should try to prove a point wrong instead of spending 7 lines saying what you could have said in 2 lines max. Please inform us as to what is a talking point from Fox that you are claiming is not true. Then we can all research what you say and find out if you are right or wrong.
@secon Nazism, Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.
What a suprise! Hitler was a National Socialist and he was not a fascist. Aisha is wrong on every point. The Tea Party is Libertarian by origin. Ron Paul for President 2012!!!
@petiemac24 Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of FASCISM that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- AND left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a FAR RIGHT form of politics.
Jonah Goldberg (Author of the book - Liberal Fascism) totally debunks Aisha Tyler's assertion that Hitler was right wing. Look up Jonah Goldberg up on youtube.
@Sixthick66 yep statism is statism, only compleate sheep, aka morons, fall for that, satism is leftism. People that say facism, Goverment USING and CONTROLLING the "private" sector is still statims and is nothing but diffrent, the semantics on communinism.
@Sixthick66 Nazism, Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.
@Sixthick66 Look up Fascism in the dictionary, it is an extreme right-wing political view that uses left-wing economic controls. And Hitler was a fascist who gained power through a false socialist platform.
@Sixthick66 fascism is a right wing philosophy. His party was called the National Socialist German Workers Party but facism is different from communism. They have a lot of similarities but the difference is that in fascism the people are allowed to own their own property and in communism the property is own by the state.
Fascism and communism only differ in implementation details. What we call "right wing" differs in Europe versus the US.
In the US, it refers to conservatism, which is an ideology favouring small government, personal freedom/liberty, and personal responsibility, along with a strong support of an "originalist" view of our written constitution. Fascism favours none of this, so clearly is not "right wing" by any meaningful standard.
@RogerOnTheRight I agree with you that what we call right wing differs. I just want to point something out before I get to my point. before WWII, we had the same labeling of ideology than Europe. It was actually FDR during his famous Fire Side Chats that switched the labels around. Getting to my point, I think that your getting conservatism confused with libertarianism.
FDR also relabeled his own ideological movement from Progressivism to Liberalism, mostly to escape the recent taint of Wilson's wartime fascism, under the guise of progressivism.
@RogerOnTheRight No. FDR changed ideology because of the New Deal. In the Fireside chats he said that those who are with the New Deal were liberals, hence "New Deal Liberals." On the otherhand, those who opposed the new deal were called conservatives. The progressive movement came 40 years before FDR became president. It was TDR who was the known progressive because of the Square Deal.
@RogerOnTheRight Getting to my point, the difference between conservatives and the far-right extremism is that the goal of fascism was to achieve the perfect human, hence Neitzche's "Uber-minch" or superman-blonde hair blue eyes. There the same in terms of how the government should run business. Like I said before, people were able to keep private property an
No, conservatism doesn't see a role for government to "run" business. Preferably, government and business would be as separate as church and state.
Private property under the Nazis was always subject to seizure by the state. Much like China today. The idea you can have property and do business is not real measure of freedom, unless you have some sort of legal system to protect your rights. And, of course, something like our Second Amendment to act as a sort of safety valve.
@RogerOnTheRight but the only thing that the Nazi's had monopolies on was violence. They didn't want a rise in power from those who weren't part of the 10% who were in the party. Germany had hands off approach to business when it came to government and business, similar to church and state. So, yes I agree with you. Remember that Nazi wanted only the "superman" and wanted to perfect the human race. They only were subject to seizure if you weren't blonde hair blue eyes.
What we call "conservative" today has nothing to do with Nazism. Nazism was a form of fascism implemented in Europe, which was an implementation of socialism.
To call it "right wing" is to fall into the trap set by the likes of Stalin, to whom all fascism must have seemed right wing, since fascism did not recognize the validity of "international socialism" and was thus a threat to Stalin's form of communism.
Was this woman born stupid or does she take lessons....the true 'conservatives' in Germany in the pre 3rd Reich era were those who had been adherents of the by then defunct Hohenzollern Kaiser Wilhelm,who then supported von Hindenburg's Weimar Republic...Hitler knew his Marx...which is why he called his movement 'national socialism'...and if memory serves, he established a true 'dictatorship of the proletariat'...this dunce wouldn't know a right wing from a right whale
@Shad0wSquirrel heh..indeed so...I am continually appalled at the utter historical ignorance of the people the media has on to discuss issues like this....she is an excellent example of the dumbing down of our public educational system for which we can thank the donkeycrats...kinda gives you a good feeling to able to look down on people like her,doesn't it?
@Shad0wSquirrel That kind of patronizing attitude won't win you many friends..either here on YouTube or in real time political discussions...just a friendly suggestion
shut the fuck up, Bush has been called 10 times worse then everthing BO is called.
as far as facism being right wing, that is what simpeltons like Tyler say, that bicth has no idea what she is talking about. The biggest hoax in human history as been getting liberals (as understsood in the US) to bye in the fanstacy that Hitler was a conservatative. Stalin and Hiter were on same page, it was just a matter what type of big LIBERAL GOV would prevail.
The definition of "right wing" has a different meaning in every culture and society. Conservatism is a localized ideology, whereas Socialism sees itself as a universal movement to unite poor oppressed people all over the world. Hitler may have been "right wing", but that is meaningless in an American context.
That lady is a fucking IDIOT! Fascism is NOT a "right wing" ideology! Hitler wanted socialized medicine for one thing... it was one of the first things he did to win over the people! This LIE that has been parroted for decades about fascism being right wing "conservative" needs to be ATTACKED every time it's uttered!
Your great at reading but not thinking thats stalinist propaganda. Because Hitler was anti-communist somehow hes a far rightwinger. His economic policies were keynesian, he believed in totalitarian control. He endorsed the Progressive eugenics. He was only right wing in that he alliged himself with traditonal conservatives to gain power but he shared little other than anti-communism with them.
Dude learn your history eugenics started in the US its biggest proponents were men like Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, Maggie Sanger and even that madman George Bernard Shaw. Couple of rightwingers there. Eugenics was the progressive way to create a more biologically pure society. There is a difference between american eugenics and Hitlers but the roots were first sown by the progressives.
@marly100 Fascism is the authoritarian control of one man. Problem is, to say the Nazi party was fascist would be foolish. The National Socialist Party of Germany evolved that way once they took power. Instead of stripping the elites of power, he forced them to work for him. They had to become party members and produce what he dictated. This is why you saw numerous industries converted into factories for war.
@eagleeye1975 Read the serious scholarship on Hitler. The Nazis were the darlings of German conservatives, capitalists and major owners of industry because the Nazis kept the Communists at bay. Hitler even confided to his inner circle that the USSR had to be destroyed to end a liberal strain which had begun in Europe with the French Revolution.
@AndrewMann552 He said communism had to be destroyed because of the "Jewish strain" in it. Educate yourself, Hitler was a socialist, he campaign on socialist reform in Germany (socialized medicine for one), and the Nazi party was the National Socialist Party of Germany. Why do you think the swastika was in a see of red on the flag?
You would think that pushing Ferdinand Porsche to make a "People's Car" would be enough proof for people like you... Pathetic...
@cflancop I recommend you actually READ about the subject, really read, don't just surf the net. The "Jewish factor" was just one part of his crusade against Communism. If Fascism is so left-wing, why did Churchill look favorably on it before Hitler became a threat to his neighbors? I recommend you read "The Coming Of The Third Reich" by Richard J. Evans and "The Rise And Fall Of Nazi Germany" by William L. Shirer. They clearly describe fascist ideaology and how it was specifically RIGHT-WING.
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."
@AndrewMann552 P.S. Your point about Churchill's opinion is nonsensical. Time Magazine made Hitler Man of the Year twice, what does that prove? Nothing. He was admired because he turned around a country, that is all. Oh, and the Freikorps, became the SA, which was eliminated because they were right wing and posed a threat to Hitler and his left wing allies within the Nazi party. Educate yourself properly!
@cflancop For Hitler's specific connection of the USSR to the liberal "radicalism" of the French Revolution, read Richard Overy's "Russia's War: A History Of The Soviet War Effort 1941-1945." And before you throw any stones, the books I've recommend were NOT written by Communists.
@cflancop And if Hitler was indeed a socialist, why did he not transfer Germany's industry to the control of workers' councils? And why did the Freikorps which later evolved into much of the Nazi apparatus crush the Spartacus League uprising of 1919 and kill Rosa Luxemburg? BOOKS my friend, BOOKS.
There is a bit of language disparity in your scholarship. "Conservatives" in Germany, all of Europe, were monarchists. Hitler was opposed to Capitalism, there is a difference between Capitalism and Corporatism (Government and Corporate Collusion). The Major Owners of Industry supported Hitler for the same reason that the big banks, Pharma, etc support Obama. He offered them the opportunity to amass wealth through government buyouts, and governmental protections.
Hitler's economic policies were centrist and were more Keynesian. His social policies were very much far to the right. The Nazis or the National Socialists as what they were referred to as were in fact all over the place because they were talking about a classless society. Hitler was an authoritarian but economically was centrist. I would call him a Fascist but Far-Right only on his social policies and not his economic policies. His social policies were similar to Stalin, who was far left
sumrandomguy3 1 week ago
@sumrandomguy3 i bet you fiddle with people while they sleep....
misterbateman808 1 day ago
@misterbateman808 No, I got this from the political compass website
sumrandomguy3 1 day ago
@sumrandomguy3 YOU FILTHY CUNT!!!!!!!!!
misterbateman808 1 day ago
nobody outside america gives a fuk
TheBigBoss851 2 weeks ago
@williambrazzers. Then you didn't really comprehend what you read. God knows I'm not one to defend either of these broads, but much like all political discussions they are both right and both wrong.
returntoglory79 1 month ago
per wiki...
generally indifferent to their position on the left-right spectrum, as being a conclusion of their combination of views rather than an objective, and considering it insignificant to their basis of their views that they claimed could just as easily be associated with "the mountain of the center" as with the right.[28] There is a running dispute among scholars about where along the left/right spectrum that fascism resides.[29][30][31][32]
returntoglory79 1 month ago
I like Aisha Tyler's comedy but she is dead wrong on everything she says in this clip.
wtg2989 2 months ago
You know I see a lot of comments on here saying Naziism was "right wing." No it was NOT. It was a very revolutionary idea, not reactionary. So stop referring to it as something it was not.
wtg2989 2 months ago
Ann Coulter is a professional political commentator and she doesn't understand that Hitler was a a right-wing extremist.....that is ridiculous, this is basic politics it's the first thing you learn in a politics class....political spectrum, Hitler was extreme right while Stalin was extreme left how is this not understood??
cormiecamby 2 months ago 5
@cormiecamby Conservatives understand history even less than they understand law. In their minds, anyone bad is automatically extreme left, regardless of their actual politics.
iruparatso 1 month ago
o man, imagine having a 3 way with both Ann Coulter and Aisha Tyler....mmm, mmm
TheJazuma 2 months ago
@TheJazuma - Yeah...first you would hit it from the extreme left then from the extreme right....OMG...can you say....ICE CREME SANDWICH......then slapping them both on the Azz while scream.....Who's ya Dick-Tator, Who's ya Dick-Tator. Yeah....that would be good....but I can help but wonder if my money shot would be taxed by the inch or by the inch or by the ounce.....yeah....a threesome with both of them would be hot.......
TheBeatSmith 1 month ago
@TheBeatSmith "taxed by the inch", fuck, that's funny lols. You're fucking funny lols. Happy New Years. hey can you tell me why @2:51 of Rihanna's S&M music video, it says "Princess of the Illuminati"? Man 2012 is gonna be a rocker...that is if the Big Ben gets bombed either during the Games or sometime after. I mean, the stadium has triangular illuminati looking lights...maybe steven jackson was onto something when he made those illuminati game cards...
TheJazuma 1 month ago
Yes,Reincouturia, its just the stupid in you. If there was any comparison,which there isn`t ,because there are few people on earth as mean and vitriolic as Andy Coulter, why would you go right to color as opposed to ideology. I guess I`m "playing the race card" by pointing this out to you.
jrleftfoot 2 months ago
She sounds like a black Ann Coulter... Guess thats just the stupid in me, but they just sound too much alike for me to listen.
Reinecouturia 3 months ago
Love to have a threesome with these 2
nonicknamekid2010 3 months ago
And talk about revisionist history.... You're making an outstanding assumption about the democratic parties motives. Now why should I accept your argument if you refuse to even recognize mine?
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
Yet another liberal trying to say the right wing is racist... if they only knew the facts about which party actually helped out most with civil rights.
theultimaterockr 6 months ago
@theultimaterockr here we go again... why don't you go ahead and google "southern strategy"... then you'll realize who REALLY helped civil rights get off the ground. this is a disturbing trend i see on the internet. republicans who seem to think that their party (as it is today) would have supported civil rights. You are DEAD wrong. Liberal ideology passed civil rights. Republicans and Democrats "switched" sides because of voting trends in the south. go ahead, look it up, i can wait.
underlinedbluetext 6 months ago
@theultimaterockr I respect your right to free speech. But for fucks sake. Get it right. You're embarrassing yourself.
underlinedbluetext 6 months ago
@underlinedbluetext Get what right? What did I get wrong?
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr here we go again... why don't you go ahead and google "southern strategy"... then you'll realize who REALLY helped civil rights get off the ground. this is a disturbing trend i see on the internet. republicans who seem to think that their party (as it is today) would have supported civil rights. You are DEAD wrong. Liberal ideology passed civil rights. Republicans and Democrats "switched" sides because of voting trends in the south. go ahead, look it up, i can wait.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext I know all about what you're talking about dude BUT they never really "switched" The thing is that Democrats had always fed off of the emotions of the average white racist & then later on switched & decided to start feeding off of the emotions of minorities & union workers. The thing is that the Repubs never became like Democrats use to be & never will. They are usually conservative in their values and try to hold themselves to a higher moral standard. Not all do but they try
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr you can't go around saying that republicans are the ones who fought for civil rights. its bullshit and you know it. that's all.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext watch the video called " The Racist History of the Republican Party " by user mcdonalsuny or Examining Black Loyalty to Democrats by machosauceproduction If you want facts watch those two and get back to me. Especially the second one
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext MLK became a registered Republican in 1956... Booker T Washington? What party freed the slaves and passed the 13,14 and 15th amendments, the Enforcement Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, George H.W. Bush's 1991 Civil Rights Act ? Teddy Roosevelt outlawed segregation in NY schools when he became governor in 1900. Eisenhower passed the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Act proposed by Repubs. What party was CREATED to FIGHT AGAINST SLAVERY? Open up a history book!
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr What don't you understand? I'm telling you that the north and the south "switched" parties a long time ago. Do you really believe that all "republicans" moved south... and all "democrats" moved north? Thats absurd! I'm not all modern republicans are "anti civil rights"... but they certainly would not have been in favor of it in the 1950's. YOU need to open a history book. Party lines have changed dramatically over time!
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext I have to thoroughly disagree with what I think you're saying. The idea that the parties have changed sides is kind of crazy and it was created by revisionist historians. It's based on the idea that the "Southern Strategy" somehow changed who voted for who. Yeah people moved from party to party. Yellow Dog Dems stayed Dems. The fact is that later on Dems decided they actually cared about minorities and their rights and they felt bad for what they had done. ...
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext ... You see the Democrat Party has only been consistent on one thing and that was feeding off of the public's emotions. They use to feed off of the emotions of the racist white people and now they don't want to look bad for their constant discrimination so they now try to feed off the emotions of every single minority whether it be race or sexual orientation.
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr lol okay buddy.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext did you read the other comment?
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr damn this comment system. anyways. i think the argument we're having here has changed...
So are you sticking to your guns on this? You really believe that liberals aren't the ones who championed civil rights? Because... thats what you originally said. And that, factually, is just not correct.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr AND!... Political parties feeding off of peoples emotions?!? I've never heard of such a thing! ... Surely you don't believe that only one side is guilty of that tactic... do you? I mean... we're in Iraq BECAUSE of emotions, because of knee jerk reactions. Yes, a lot of dems supported that. But that doesn't change the fact that emotions are a great way to push your agenda forward. Both sides are "guilty" of this, on so many levels.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext I know we're in Iraq for that reason and I don't agree with it either. I'm not saying both parties don't do it. I'm saying that Dems use race and sex orientation to get votes. The fact is that Dems use things like the race card so so often that it makes them look like the little boy who cried racist. The best way to attract attention away from your own failure is to start calling other people names. I just gets ridiculous ya know?
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr Right. but again... the other side uses the same type of self-victimization... emotional appeals. I often hear conservatives say "oh i suppose that makes me racist" or you hear them bring up the race card.... even when it's just a matter of race, not racism. I don't know many racist republicans, I'm sure they exist. But for the most part, republicans aren't racist! But for some reason... they'll jump at any chance to bring the 'race card' factor into an argument.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr and believe me, I'm fucking tired of it too. I'm tired of the right left thing... I'm tired of the blame game. All I want is a cohesive and logical national discussion. I've never seen it once... and doubt I ever will. We have to recognize race as a factor in all of this just like we have to figure in religion as well.
We can argue back and forth all day. I just took exception to your original comment... and now I feel like that has been reconciled. Have a good one!
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
@underlinedbluetext Yeah I suppose we could keep arguing. I just hate that Republicans get no credit for anything or the truth gets twisted about them. It's an annoyance ya know? George Washington thought there shouldn't be political parties because he thought it would separate people and I guess he was right. Have a great day to you too sir!
theultimaterockr 5 months ago
@theultimaterockr ... have you seen my comment on your profile from two weeks ago? right there is a perfect example of someone being irrational. lol Sorry about that.
underlinedbluetext 5 months ago
I think it's hilarious how Ann Coulter couldn't even say anything after Aisha was finished talking...she got showed up by a (very educated and poised) Comedian in something that she should already know about.
blahblahblahman 7 months ago
It's unfair to call fascism a right wing philosophy inside the subtext of American Left & right wing. Fascism is a European ideal, and if you really want to be fair - then you have to admit that the left & right wing in Europe is totally different than US politics. We are a republic in which fascism cannot exist. With further anylsis, since progressives want to ape the "utopian" societies of Europe, then both the European left & right wings would easily get along inside today's progressive camp!
Scapp70 7 months ago
This is why Nobody should be compared to Hitler. People get confused by what a country names it's type of government and try to lump everything that's called socialism under one definition. All countries have some sort of mixed economy. We have never seen true capitalism, socialism, or communism as defined by those who coined the terms. Hitler's state was totalitarian. Every totalitarian state is defined by the dictator who runs it and they all have their own ideas how things should be ran
jackedup2077 9 months ago
Inflation inevitably drives some significant percentage of the population into a higher tax bracket, thus taxes inevitably go up, not down.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
Here are the similarities and if you need facts you can check out Kristof Breezinski on youtube:
1. an ideology focusing on achieving the perfect human
2. A system lead by a dictator with his/her party restricting members to 10% of the population
3. A system of terrioristic police.
4. A monopoly on violence
5. monopoly on masked violence
6. coplete control and direction of the economy.
the difference was that in Fascism people own property communism property is own by state.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
What you just wrote almost perfectly describes the liberal/progressive ideology of today.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
Aisha Tyler is misleading and herself misunderstood of the National Socialism. Hitler was not a stupid leftwinger or a rightwinger or whatever. Hitler was not a fascist, but the founder and builder of National Socialism. Lastly, to the people who compare Obama to Hitler, "HOW DARE YOU COMPARE STUPID OBAMA TO HITLER?" Hitler was one of the greatest leaders of all time, and Obama has done nothing and he himself is nothing.
IloveUSA1941 1 year ago
The oddity of black people bringing up Hitler is that unbeknown to most people, Hitler has very strong ties with the international Muslim community before and after the extermination program of Jews during World War II, while Obama also has strong religious and cultural ties with the international Muslim community. Yet, both Hitler and the Arab Muslims around the world abhors and loathes black people. The utter stupidity and ignorance of people is quite perplexing to me.
Jollycoolwater 1 year ago
@Jollycoolwater Umm....are you joking? The only conspiracy I heard about Hilter was that he was funded by the Bush family, Wall Street and Zionist because they wanted Jews to leave Europe so they can form their secular, Jewish state?? Why did Muslims get added, I think Muslims were too busy being exploited and waiting for future exploitation of themselves and their land as the greed for money of the America and British swell up.
KpopManiacSFL 1 year ago
@KpopManiacSFL No, I'm not kidding. Youtube is at your finger tips. There are numerous video clips of meetings between Hitler and Grand Mufti Amin Al Husseini to plan out the extermination of Jews. They also created a division of Muslim SS officers. Key in "Hitler Muslim".
Jollycoolwater 1 year ago
she is hotter than ann coulter
HK91PTR 1 year ago
@HK91PTR and needs to read a book or two...
dontanner232 1 year ago
Hey Aisha..you're not an expert,dont know what the fuck you're even doing there.Token negro? yes I think so
mrlafayette1964 1 year ago
@mrlafayette1964
Shut the fuck up, moron, Ann Coulter is a dumb white bitch and Aisha Tyler left her speechless in this interview. Hahaha!
blahblahblahman 7 months ago
@blahblahblahman yeah, mouth off on the internet there tough guy.You're probably gay
mrlafayette1964 7 months ago
National socialism/Nazism was just a name there was nothing socialist about it
MamaMario13 1 year ago 2
@MamaMario13 oh contraire mon frere.
If you look at the party platform it is all about workers right to jobs, infringement on property rights. The common joke to say to someone on the left bad mouthing the Nazis is "Beside the racism and murder, what do you have against the Nazis" I don't agree with their platform but most Democratic party planks match up nicely. It's all about community and the individual is crap compared to the state.
ronwandell 1 year ago
How can fascism and libertarianism BOTH be far right ideologies? That, in itself, makes no sense.
This is why we know have 2 axis on the political spectrum scale, not just one line
kenny99996565665 1 year ago
Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago 9
@justthefactsyouidiot The US and Europe seem to have somewhat different definitions of right and left. Hilter and Stalin were both statist - they agreed with state control just disagree on how it was applied much like our Democratic and Republican parties. In the US politcal spectrum Libertarianism is far right and shares many similar view points to anarchism - the exact opposite of statism. Mrs. Tyler sees only Democratic and Republican parties.
jpollard117 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People say that all of the time and have no understanding of Fascism, socialism, or conservatism. Fascism, nazism, communism, socialism all ahev 1 glaring obvious similarity.... GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!
Conservatism is conservative spending on government, with less(not no, only less) regulations and an increase in personal responsibility and personal freedom. Libertarianism and anarchy are further right then conservatism.
jeffn21 1 year ago
People say that all of the time and have no understanding of Fascism, socialism, or conservatism. Fascism, nazism, communism, socialism all ahev 1 glaring obvious similarity.... GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!
Conservatism is conservative spending on government, with less(not no, only less) regulations and an increase in personal responsibility and personal freedom. Libertarianism and anarchy are further right then conservatism.
jeffn21 1 year ago
Aisha Tyler is a total idiot, she not only drank obama's kool-aid she must have injected it into her veins.
TheodoresWorld 1 year ago
Aisha Tyler is the dumbest smart person I have ever seen. Her brain has been infected by liberalism . She is trying to make some ridiculous point about Hitler and casually has to re-write history and the English language to do it. Hitler was a right wing conservative ? I guess the marxist Lee Harvey Oswald was a right winger too.
Hitler was a socialist thug just like your jug-earred manchild Aisha. Accept it.
She does have a great rack though.
Deadkurtrulz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Deadkurtrulz Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago
haas aisha not read hitler's 1927 speech on capitalism? the only reason hitler was not a communist was because marx was a jew.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
Hitler was a Pagan freak
Musicofthissphere 1 year ago
I think Aisha Tyler is a smart, funny and beautiful women. But i have to say she doesnt know what the hell she is talking about.. SHe just simply has wrong info. Im sorry but it is what it is... Fascism deals with Dictatorship, Monarchy, econimic and social control fom the dictator..... That is the opposite of right wing ideology which deals with Democracy and SMALL Govt, Free market.. Where the hell did she get that from?
bigstU25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bigstU25 Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Fascism originally combined left-wing and right-wing political views, but it gravitated to the political right in the EARLY 1920s. SCHOLARS generally consider fascism to be on the FAR RIGHT of the conventional left-right political spectrum.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago
Fascism has been argued to have extreme influence from both sides, but traditionally is seen as extreme right. Look up policies of fascist governments and decide what you think. For help, fascist gov'ts include Mussolini (Italy), Nazism (Germany), Iron Guard (Romania), Falangism (Spain), Integralism (Brazil), Metaxas' 4th of August Regime (Greece), Imperial Rule Assistance Association (Japan), Estado Novo (Portugal), Fatherland Front (Austria), Kai-tsu p'ai faction of the Kuomintang (China)
haleaaron 1 year ago
Excerpt from Adolph Hitlers speech, as Germany's labor party leader, 01 May 1927.
"
We are socialists, we are enemies of todays capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.
"
Evidently, Democrats never learn anything. NEVER.
EVER.
Verboten !
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull
Pretty retarded. He was right wing conservative when it came to most issues and a socialist when it came to the economy. You're an idiot.
Rawrlor 1 year ago
TylerNull 1 year ago
@TylerNull I think he was saying as a mockery to America when they coined the phrase fascism and communism.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9 Agreed
dannonstewart9 8 months ago
@TylerNull Look at their actions
scottward12 9 months ago
Comment removed
TylerNull 9 months ago
@scottward12
"Look at their actions" -- let's . . .
Darwinian Socialists -- CHECK.
Labor leaders -- CHECK.
Nationalize health care -- CHECK.
Setting the price of labor -- CHECK.
Disarming the citizenry -- CHECK.
Selectively subsidizing businesses -- CHECK.
Invading all facets of everyone's life -- CHECK.
Liberals, Nazis -- tom-A-toe, tom-ah-toe
TylerNull 9 months ago
i thought i've seen this white women some where before, this is JJ, from THE GOOD TIMES SHOWS GIRLFRIEND, she's high off j j big black dick & will say anything silly to stay in the game.
TheVee909 1 year ago
Hitler's philosophy was leftwing. The only person he was to the right of was Stalin, who coined the idea of called the nazis "right".
tonyschmoeredux 1 year ago
Ascubaguy any person with some education knows the 2 party's role have switched 200 years ago. The republicans was the northern liberal, the party of Abraham Lincoln but not anymore. You didn't mention these people in the republican party who was a segregationist or (KKK) member let me help you; Jesse helms, sen. Larry Craig, mills Godwin, trent lott, John Patterson, David duke (GOP) fritz hollings
withataman01 1 year ago
All i hear is yet another black whining about subjects they have no comprehension of ever understanding. All this is, is black social liberation and justice. It has nothing to do with acting like an American, having a job, raising children or getting an education. It's all about how much they can milk the government out of mo' money instead of taking responsibility for their own lives. Let's see how far white guilt will last before it's all said and done with. Paul Ryan 2012!
freedompatriot1 1 year ago
Her ignorance is astounding.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists Fascism? You are just using talk show talking point. You don't know anything about fascism and socialism. You don't know the difference between Hitler's, Mussolini's, Tojo's or Franco's fascism. Socialist Russia and Fascist Germany fought in world war 2, if they were the same why would they fight you idiot. Get back to me in ten years when you learn something you're still struck in the 3rd grade.
withataman01 1 year ago
I dont even consider anyone but mussolini a fascist. Hitlers system was for one totalitarian and based on racial superiority and utopian anti-modernism. Do you even know anything about the volksgemeinschaft? Oh so the soviets and Nazis fought in WW2 anyone who fights each other must be ideological enemies?
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
You do realize that they had an alliance for 2 years and split up eastern europe. How about the Bourbons and the Habsburgs in the 17th and 18th century both absolute monarchies both somehow fought each other. Hitler wasnt a socialist but he was certainly not a conservative.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
Good strategy by the way I ask you what the difference is between fascism and national socialism and you add some pathetic insults and expect me to explain the difference.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists well, I answer the question but you still seems confuse. Fascism is a form of right wing totalitarianism, because they have risen in a relatively advanced society. Fascism grew out of the fear of socialism. That came out of Italy with Mussolini. That's the difference, socialism and fascism are not the same.
withataman01 1 year ago
Lmao your such an idiot. Fascism in Italy has a lot to do with socialism. Mussolini was one of Italys most prominent socialists and just split with the party over ww1. They obviously are not the same. Hitler and mussolini themselves were very different. Lets look at hilters policies though a big nanny state (left wing), anti-free trade (left wing), keynesian economic policies (left wing). You really know no more than you were taught by brainwashed idiots.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
Is bolshevism socialism?
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
Oh and i know the answer btw so dont be smug.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists Your are a pea brain, when you go to Italy and talk to the government. The first thing that they say " the most famous fascist was Italian dictator Benito Mussolini " I guess you know more than the Italian government. I can tell you are really an idiot. I would give you their email address but, they said no,they don't wanna talk to you it's a waste of time.
withataman01 1 year ago
Could you point out where I denied that mussolini was a fascist? No you cant. Now you're fantasizing about talking with the italian government. Ask them who Mussolini worked for from 1908-1914. Mussolini until the first world war was an ardent socialist. Note I said he split with the party over the war. Fascism was very much an evolution from his early socialist beliefs.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists Ok so my aunt is not married to someone in the Italian government for 15 years. I don't talk to my in-laws in Italy. Ok I got it, go take your medication. Something is wrong with you, not because you lie so much, makes everybody a liar.
withataman01 1 year ago
Convenient to completely avoid the errors I raise with your perception of Mussolini as a right winger. And more importantly do you have any idea what Hitlers ideology involved? No.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
If you ask the KKK or the skinheads, what party you voted for in the last election? They would say the republican or the conserative party. The republican party prey upon the fear of people or propaganda that's what the NAZI did with the German people The teabaggers should called themselves THE NAZIBAGGERS!!!
withataman01 1 year ago
@withataman01 Who's the current DEMOCRAT senator who was formerly a high-ranking member of the KKK? Byrd? I might be wrong about the name of the guy, but I'm right about which party. Also - after segregation was abolished in our country, who came along and wanted to reinstitute it? A DEMOCRAT!
ascubaguy 1 year ago
@ascubaguy Robert Byrd, a former Kleagle (recruiter) and Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, is a reminder of the Democrat's ugly history.
"I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds"
Robert Byrd 1944
cflancop 1 year ago
God owes you one brain.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists I can tell you have to be a reptilian, oops! I mean republican. Your brain is made out of applesauce, LOL...
withataman01 1 year ago
This is what most liberals are in this country, completely miseducated - never bothering to read books or even check the history channel. The indoctrinated class are so embarrassing. Does Aisha not know what N.A.Z.I. stands for? I'd also bet that she doesn't know the history of the Democrat Party; [KKK, Jim Crow, etc.] And also, Aisha - Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman and MLK were Republicans. My God educate yourself!
haypenny 1 year ago
The Jews was under fascism,they would know the difference the between right wing party and a left wing party. 99% of Jews vote for the left wing party not the republican party
.
withataman01 1 year ago
Wow your a complete moron. Great logic. Do you even know the difference between fascism and national socialism?
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
What
withataman01 1 year ago
Didn't she go to Dartmouth? So much for Ivy league education.
34thstreetman 1 year ago
Wow every one of you is a racist moron.
It would be funny if it werent so damn sad.
dont bother responding, i dont care enough about what you have to say to read it.
chericheeks 1 year ago
Aisha, although you are hot and try to speak a mile a minute so no one can tell you that your facts are wrong, you need to smarten up. Hitler was big gov't, anti religion, anti jew etc...these are liberal policies that we see even more now with Obama's hatred of Israel. Stick to comedy girl...
bigbad169 1 year ago
Dear Aisha, please do your homework. Hitler was big government and anti-religion. How that even remotely compares to the Republican party is a mystery to me.
Balthazaro 1 year ago
i suggest some of you actually learn what words mean. i have a sneaking suspicion that "fascism" "right wing" "conservative" "left wing" don't mean what you seem to think they mean. you also might want to pick up a history book and open it up the the chapter about adolf hitler so you can possibly learn something and hopefully realize how completely moronic and clueless your words look when you post about things you don't understand. (hint: repeating ad nauseum fox news talking points = failure)
secon 1 year ago
@secon maybe you should try to prove a point wrong instead of spending 7 lines saying what you could have said in 2 lines max. Please inform us as to what is a talking point from Fox that you are claiming is not true. Then we can all research what you say and find out if you are right or wrong.
Balthazaro 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@secon Nazism, Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago
the progressive jackasses constantly referred to Geo Bush as Hitler
turnabout is always fair play
genie0390 1 year ago
She needs to read my 'unauthorized biography of the President...."Barack Obama: Nigga Hitler or Hitler's Nigga?"
Armigerous 1 year ago
Now I know why She "Aisha" don't have long acting rolls, god what did she do funnel the obama cool aid. Pretty but stupid.
ShogunBob 1 year ago 2
Typical ignorant Obama supporter. This is so sad.
freedomlover24 1 year ago 2
What a suprise! Hitler was a National Socialist and he was not a fascist. Aisha is wrong on every point. The Tea Party is Libertarian by origin. Ron Paul for President 2012!!!
petiemac24 1 year ago
@petiemac24 Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of FASCISM that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- AND left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a FAR RIGHT form of politics.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago
0:50
lol aisha retarded
aweiss 1 year ago
Jonah Goldberg (Author of the book - Liberal Fascism) totally debunks Aisha Tyler's assertion that Hitler was right wing. Look up Jonah Goldberg up on youtube.
ciscokid998 1 year ago
i am glad to see people FINALLY waking up and taking on the mistaken idea that HITLER was somehow 'right wing'.
Fascism is , was, and always will be a leftist ideology.
Sixthick66 1 year ago 8
@Sixthick66 yep statism is statism, only compleate sheep, aka morons, fall for that, satism is leftism. People that say facism, Goverment USING and CONTROLLING the "private" sector is still statims and is nothing but diffrent, the semantics on communinism.
ORVX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sixthick66 Nazism, Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany. It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.
justthefactsyouidiot 1 year ago
@Sixthick66 Look up Fascism in the dictionary, it is an extreme right-wing political view that uses left-wing economic controls. And Hitler was a fascist who gained power through a false socialist platform.
Raven15311 1 year ago
@Raven15311
enjoy your koolaid
Sixthick66 10 months ago
@Raven15311
Hitler was in favour of personal freedom and responsibility? And smaller, less intrusive government?
Wow, the things you learn on da interwebs.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
@Sixthick66 fascism is a right wing philosophy. His party was called the National Socialist German Workers Party but facism is different from communism. They have a lot of similarities but the difference is that in fascism the people are allowed to own their own property and in communism the property is own by the state.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
fascism is a 'right wing' philosophy as soon as socialism becomes a right wind ideology..
please continue to enjoy your koolaid.
Sixthick66 10 months ago
@Sixthick66 i don't know if "please enjoy your koolaid" is a black joke, but facism is a FAR right ideology.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
Fascism and communism only differ in implementation details. What we call "right wing" differs in Europe versus the US.
In the US, it refers to conservatism, which is an ideology favouring small government, personal freedom/liberty, and personal responsibility, along with a strong support of an "originalist" view of our written constitution. Fascism favours none of this, so clearly is not "right wing" by any meaningful standard.
Stalin labeled fascism "right wing".
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight I agree with you that what we call right wing differs. I just want to point something out before I get to my point. before WWII, we had the same labeling of ideology than Europe. It was actually FDR during his famous Fire Side Chats that switched the labels around. Getting to my point, I think that your getting conservatism confused with libertarianism.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
FDR also relabeled his own ideological movement from Progressivism to Liberalism, mostly to escape the recent taint of Wilson's wartime fascism, under the guise of progressivism.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight No. FDR changed ideology because of the New Deal. In the Fireside chats he said that those who are with the New Deal were liberals, hence "New Deal Liberals." On the otherhand, those who opposed the new deal were called conservatives. The progressive movement came 40 years before FDR became president. It was TDR who was the known progressive because of the Square Deal.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
Just to be clear, FDR did not change ideologies, he changed labels. Nothing more.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight just to be clear, FDR changed the label. see 2 post ago for reasoning.
dannonstewart9 9 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight Getting to my point, the difference between conservatives and the far-right extremism is that the goal of fascism was to achieve the perfect human, hence Neitzche's "Uber-minch" or superman-blonde hair blue eyes. There the same in terms of how the government should run business. Like I said before, people were able to keep private property an
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@dannonstewart9
No, conservatism doesn't see a role for government to "run" business. Preferably, government and business would be as separate as church and state.
Private property under the Nazis was always subject to seizure by the state. Much like China today. The idea you can have property and do business is not real measure of freedom, unless you have some sort of legal system to protect your rights. And, of course, something like our Second Amendment to act as a sort of safety valve.
RogerOnTheRight 10 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight but the only thing that the Nazi's had monopolies on was violence. They didn't want a rise in power from those who weren't part of the 10% who were in the party. Germany had hands off approach to business when it came to government and business, similar to church and state. So, yes I agree with you. Remember that Nazi wanted only the "superman" and wanted to perfect the human race. They only were subject to seizure if you weren't blonde hair blue eyes.
dannonstewart9 10 months ago
@RogerOnTheRight You do know that conservatism isn't the sole right wing ideology? Nazism is right wing fascism, plain and simple
scottward12 9 months ago 6
@scottward12
What we call "conservative" today has nothing to do with Nazism. Nazism was a form of fascism implemented in Europe, which was an implementation of socialism.
To call it "right wing" is to fall into the trap set by the likes of Stalin, to whom all fascism must have seemed right wing, since fascism did not recognize the validity of "international socialism" and was thus a threat to Stalin's form of communism.
Yet both were socialism, and thus leftist.
RogerOnTheRight 9 months ago
Was this woman born stupid or does she take lessons....the true 'conservatives' in Germany in the pre 3rd Reich era were those who had been adherents of the by then defunct Hohenzollern Kaiser Wilhelm,who then supported von Hindenburg's Weimar Republic...Hitler knew his Marx...which is why he called his movement 'national socialism'...and if memory serves, he established a true 'dictatorship of the proletariat'...this dunce wouldn't know a right wing from a right whale
Armigerous 1 year ago 3
@Armigerous a little bit of both
Shad0wSquirrel 1 year ago
@Shad0wSquirrel heh..indeed so...I am continually appalled at the utter historical ignorance of the people the media has on to discuss issues like this....she is an excellent example of the dumbing down of our public educational system for which we can thank the donkeycrats...kinda gives you a good feeling to able to look down on people like her,doesn't it?
Armigerous 1 year ago
@Armigerous i was just joking calm down k?
Shad0wSquirrel 1 year ago
@Shad0wSquirrel That kind of patronizing attitude won't win you many friends..either here on YouTube or in real time political discussions...just a friendly suggestion
Armigerous 1 year ago
@Armigerous well noted, hugs?
Shad0wSquirrel 1 year ago
@Shad0wSquirrel not unless you are a squirrelette...but we can shake on it
Armigerous 1 year ago
Yeah Hitler claimed that Socialism was stolen from the nationalists by the marxists and his movement attempted to rectify this.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
shut the fuck up, Bush has been called 10 times worse then everthing BO is called.
as far as facism being right wing, that is what simpeltons like Tyler say, that bicth has no idea what she is talking about. The biggest hoax in human history as been getting liberals (as understsood in the US) to bye in the fanstacy that Hitler was a conservatative. Stalin and Hiter were on same page, it was just a matter what type of big LIBERAL GOV would prevail.
ORVX 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
sroney2814 1 year ago
The definition of "right wing" has a different meaning in every culture and society. Conservatism is a localized ideology, whereas Socialism sees itself as a universal movement to unite poor oppressed people all over the world. Hitler may have been "right wing", but that is meaningless in an American context.
marzutraII 1 year ago
That lady is a fucking IDIOT! Fascism is NOT a "right wing" ideology! Hitler wanted socialized medicine for one thing... it was one of the first things he did to win over the people! This LIE that has been parroted for decades about fascism being right wing "conservative" needs to be ATTACKED every time it's uttered!
eagleeye1975 1 year ago 8
@eagleeye1975 What are you talking about? Fascism is the farthest right of the political continuem. Don't believe me, google it.
marly100 1 year ago
Your great at reading but not thinking thats stalinist propaganda. Because Hitler was anti-communist somehow hes a far rightwinger. His economic policies were keynesian, he believed in totalitarian control. He endorsed the Progressive eugenics. He was only right wing in that he alliged himself with traditonal conservatives to gain power but he shared little other than anti-communism with them.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@Seaworldexists That's quite a valid arguement but just to inform you, eugenics is never progressive, at least with Hitler's case.
marly100 1 year ago
Dude learn your history eugenics started in the US its biggest proponents were men like Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, Maggie Sanger and even that madman George Bernard Shaw. Couple of rightwingers there. Eugenics was the progressive way to create a more biologically pure society. There is a difference between american eugenics and Hitlers but the roots were first sown by the progressives.
Seaworldexists 1 year ago
@marly100 Fascism is the authoritarian control of one man. Problem is, to say the Nazi party was fascist would be foolish. The National Socialist Party of Germany evolved that way once they took power. Instead of stripping the elites of power, he forced them to work for him. They had to become party members and produce what he dictated. This is why you saw numerous industries converted into factories for war.
The political spectrum is a circle, not a line.
cflancop 1 year ago
@eagleeye1975 Read the serious scholarship on Hitler. The Nazis were the darlings of German conservatives, capitalists and major owners of industry because the Nazis kept the Communists at bay. Hitler even confided to his inner circle that the USSR had to be destroyed to end a liberal strain which had begun in Europe with the French Revolution.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
@AndrewMann552 He said communism had to be destroyed because of the "Jewish strain" in it. Educate yourself, Hitler was a socialist, he campaign on socialist reform in Germany (socialized medicine for one), and the Nazi party was the National Socialist Party of Germany. Why do you think the swastika was in a see of red on the flag?
You would think that pushing Ferdinand Porsche to make a "People's Car" would be enough proof for people like you... Pathetic...
cflancop 1 year ago
@cflancop I recommend you actually READ about the subject, really read, don't just surf the net. The "Jewish factor" was just one part of his crusade against Communism. If Fascism is so left-wing, why did Churchill look favorably on it before Hitler became a threat to his neighbors? I recommend you read "The Coming Of The Third Reich" by Richard J. Evans and "The Rise And Fall Of Nazi Germany" by William L. Shirer. They clearly describe fascist ideaology and how it was specifically RIGHT-WING.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AndrewMann552 Once again, in Hitler's own words.
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."
cflancop 1 year ago
@AndrewMann552 P.S. Your point about Churchill's opinion is nonsensical. Time Magazine made Hitler Man of the Year twice, what does that prove? Nothing. He was admired because he turned around a country, that is all. Oh, and the Freikorps, became the SA, which was eliminated because they were right wing and posed a threat to Hitler and his left wing allies within the Nazi party. Educate yourself properly!
cflancop 1 year ago
@cflancop For Hitler's specific connection of the USSR to the liberal "radicalism" of the French Revolution, read Richard Overy's "Russia's War: A History Of The Soviet War Effort 1941-1945." And before you throw any stones, the books I've recommend were NOT written by Communists.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
@cflancop And if Hitler was indeed a socialist, why did he not transfer Germany's industry to the control of workers' councils? And why did the Freikorps which later evolved into much of the Nazi apparatus crush the Spartacus League uprising of 1919 and kill Rosa Luxemburg? BOOKS my friend, BOOKS.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
There is a bit of language disparity in your scholarship. "Conservatives" in Germany, all of Europe, were monarchists. Hitler was opposed to Capitalism, there is a difference between Capitalism and Corporatism (Government and Corporate Collusion). The Major Owners of Industry supported Hitler for the same reason that the big banks, Pharma, etc support Obama. He offered them the opportunity to amass wealth through government buyouts, and governmental protections.
nationalpride 1 year ago