People, wake up. CNN, FOX, MSNBC... They all spew the same BS. If I were to roast Bill I could have done a MUCH better job. They are all full of shit. It's all red vs blue, repubs vs demos, left vs right. It's a paradigm. None of them ever talk about the real issues.
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust u have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
The majority of American and British cannot spell correctly.The majority of people i have met from Europe and North Africa can speak 2 or 3 languages.We seem to be being kept dumb for some reason,a legacy of Bush and Blair perhaps.Or as i call them,Dos Tonto Cabrons
HELP SPREAD THE WORD! GOVERNOR JINDAL UNDER FIRE AS POLITICAL SCANDAL IS BREWING!! LOUISIANA MEDIA IS TRYING TO COVER IT UP. JUST GOOGLE SEARCH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE FULL STORY;
It's now so obvious why this pathetic, liberal, retarded jackass was fired. He's an idiot with no class. He's ignorant and stupid, yet poses as an intellectual. He's a tool, moron and dumb ass. Glad to see him go. :-)
@bluegsp You're a troll. Plain and simple. Posting comments without any facts to support your remarks is unacceptable in any public forum. It's my OBLIGATION as a rational thinking American to expose your misguided attempts at influencing public opinion by spreading false information and unsubstantiated political rhetoric. Civilized Americans like me who are educated and think rationally about our country's social and political affairs are on to you and all of your pin-headed neo-con friends.
@Rattlemneocons You babble on incoherently and with out any evidence of your allegations. You have been intellectually destroyed and now you are reduced to sounding like a whining little bitch. It seems that you are simple too stupid to understand basic conversational English. I have given the source's of the studies and attributed quotes to the people who made them. You seem to be emotionally unstable and unable to successfully converse any topic with out some sort of insane rant. XD
@Rattlemneocons - no it's not. You have a right. It's not your OBLIGATION to correct people. Who gave you that obligation? And why you? Your statement has no facts. Get over yourself.
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL READERS: Bluegsp is a troll who NEVER gets the facts straight. Save yourself a lot of grief and dismiss everything this nit wit hayseed simpleton says. He is a brainless gasbag and he is very proud of it. College bound Americans understand how important it is to cite your comments or support your remarks with valid references. This is far too challenging for bluegsp because bluegsp is a high school drop-out.
@Rattlemneocons IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL READERS: Rattlemneocons is an a left wing liar and a complete idiot. He has failed at every attempt to debate me so he has resorted this type of childish stalking. As you notice, he never addresses the issues, only makes outrageous and stupid personal attacks. Pay no attention to such an intellectual lightweight and just spit on him at any opportunity.
Fuck MSNBC and FOX. They're both just huge circlejerks. Try reading a paper instead of watching these biased editorial programs with entertainment value in mind more so than news value.
@bluegsp I can't believe I have to do this, but here is your original post (I've succumbed to quoting a rampant jackass): "I didn't prove it, UCLA, George Mason University, Chicago University and every other study on the subject has proven it. You have a problem with reality. Learn to think for yourself and stop repeating what lying liberal propagandists tell you." - You. I see only three studies. No where in your post did it mention a PEW Research study. I guess that's another win for me! XD
@bluegsp "Fox News is the most accurate news network on television"? You must be shrooming. Maybe we aren't reading the same material. Or just maybe you don't quite know how to read yet? Either way you look at it, I just put you over my knee and whaled your uninformed ass. Next time try citing RELATIVE, lucrative examples. And learn how to count. You actually thought there was four studies? Wow. I just think it's funny how you keep calling me an idiot when you're the one making all the errors.XD
@bluegsp Actually, Three studies, moron (Chicago, UCLA, and George Mason; Wow, get owned. Hoisted by your own baton). The only reason I didn't cite Chicago is because Chicago never did any study that I could find very easily. And as I have explained in the past they are used out of context; UCLA's study was whether or not media is biased and George Mason's study proved Fox to be the #1 competitor for ELECTION RESULTS (which isn't anything to be proud of). You really thought these studies said...
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR FOUR STUDIES, Moron, you neglected The PEW Research Center Study, Jackass! It is you that has been owned over and over again. You have made nothing but "errors" and out right lies. You are the idiot and you prove it with every post. XD
FUCKING A OLBERMANN!!!! O'Reilly is a Fox propaganda tool who doesn't know his ass from his elbow. This ignoramus should be stripped naked, thrown in the street and stoned to death.
@bulgarianfish "These guys never have understood nothing.." You call them idiots, however that sentence makes you sound like the idiot. Check your sentences, and their fluency before you attack a news station, which still has a huge fan base, for being idiots. You cannot base an entire news station off of one closed minded, illiterate douche-bag. Saying something like that essentially puts you at the same level as 'OReilly. You attack fox news for being right winged while MSNBC is all for a NWO.
@bluegsp You win. I give up. I have purchased a gun, and am planning to kill myself in your name. I hope to see you in God's GHoly Land. Where I can shit down your bumpkin throat. Good fucking day!
@bluegsp You proved nothing. You gave two studies that you used out of context. I owned you, and you continue to deny it. You don't know what it means to be libertarian because if you did you wouldn't have said that I deny being liberal. Bill misspoke and the proof is in the video. I have yet to believe that you have even watched this video. I am clearly not an idiot if you have to succumb to name calling.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Four studies, moron. They are not out of context and they prove your ill informed opinion to be nothing but the bullshit that it is. The only thing you have "owned" is the title of Biggest Idiot on Earth. Only the most far left liberal idiots like you would defend this fired moron Kieth in the face of his obvious lies. Bill didn't misspeak, he was correct and I have proven it. You started out with nothing but name calling, so you ARE clearly the idiot. Pwnd again. XD
@bluegsp Did you say that you concede? Wow, do you even know what that means? If you concede, then that means I win! Wow, you're dumb. You just conceded that I was winning!
You see what I did here? I took your claim out of context and used to my advantage. Such are the maneuvers of Fox news, Bill O'Reilly, and therefore you, too. It's easy to manipulate information. It's believing the truth that seems to be a lot harder for you somehow.
Simply watch the other videos of Bill getting destroyed.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Your parsing of words when it comes to the "World Wide Web" is exactly the dishonesty that is typical of lying liberals like Clinton, Olbermann and you. This is another example of your lies that you falsely state that I don't give reason. Study after study shows that Fox is the most accurate news on television.
This in a nut shell is how I have repeatedly destroyed you and explained your layer after layer of lies and stupidity.
@bluegsp Whoa there! That's a pretty big leap to say that ONE news network is more accurate in EVERY aspect of televised broadcasting. Explain yourself. Are they more accurate in just politics, or did you mean overall they are the most accurate news station? I'm not sure how you can prove either of those claims, or even show me where I can find those so called "studies". It is true Fox news maintains some aspects of truth. It is when they couple it with manipulation that I have a problem with.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR I didn't prove it, UCLA, George Mason University, Chicago University and every other study on the subject has proven it. You have a problem with reality. Learn to think for yourself and stop repeating what lying liberal propagandists tell you. Olbermann is gone, Clark is gone, Bill still dominates the ratings, and you are still an idiot. XD
@bluegsp First off, I'm not a liberal. I'm libertarian. Second off, UCLA's study is an Interro called "Is Media Biased?". The article said nothing of one news team being more accurate (collectively speaking of course) than the others. It did however point out a liberal bias in the mainstream media news networks (Fox, CNN, MSNBC). George Mason's study mentioned Fox as the most accurate news network in regards to polling about ELECTION RESULTS. Nothing more. You took these studies out of context.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are a liberal, you just don't want to admit it Every study done on the media shows that Fox is the most accurate and least biased. You have just given example of 2 of them. Keep doing your homework and look into the rest of them and they will show you how stupid and uninformed you are.
@bluegsp Um, o.k. Now how the hell am I supposed to continue the debate from here? All you've done is told me I am not really a libertarian, repeated yourself that Fox is still the most accurate news network on television (obviously ignoring my claims about the studies' context), and then you just insulted me. What does Fox's integrity have anything to do at all with what Bill said? Bill misspoke. No study from any school will tell you otherwise, man. Stick to the issues. Stop with the insults.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Look up the word "Hypocrite" and you will see your picture. Bill didn't misspeak, you poor intellectual skills didn't understand him, and then when he clarified for you, you refused to understand because your hero Kieth told you not to. You choose not to believe the numerous studies that I have placed in front of you because it doesn't fit your narrative. You are a Liberal and you refuse to admit it. That is dishonest and makes you a liar.
@bluegsp Because I believe in the minimization of state affairs and local government entities, I am not a liberal. I am a libertarian. And I looked at your studies (they are impressive studies in their own aspects, but have virtually nothing to do with overall accuracy; how would one begin to measure overall accuracy? News teams don't all cover the same stories). And why would Bill need to clarify anything if he didn't misspeak in the first place? Can we first agree that he did misspeak?
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are a liberal and you are ashamed to admit it. If you were a libertarian, you would agree with Bill. You have no objectivity if you can listen to this moron, Olbermann and give his rant even a shred of credibility. Any thinking person would hear what Keith is saying and say "I can't believe it.", unless you are predisposed to grasp at anything to smear O'Reilly. Just because Bill wasn't as clear as he could have been in this 5 second analogy, doesn't mean he misspoke.
@bluegsp Instead of offering insights you just stop all debate and scorn your opponent for being a "lying a liberal". This is a textbook example of proctoring an argument. What do I got to do? Spell it out for you. Jesus, man.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR I have followed the discussion where you have taken it, moron. You start out attacking me and ignoring the topic, I attacked back and destroyed you. When you finally got around to addressing the video, (in your post from 6 hours ago), I replied and destroyed you again. You have no grasp of the English language, you don't know what you are talking about. (When I expose your lies, then call you a liar, that is not "proctoring", it is stating a fact.) What an idiot. XD
@bluegsp You'll have to forgive me for attacking you. But you happen to be a huge target. Though I am unaware exactly how you've destroyed me. And, yes, it is still proctoring. It wouldn't be proctoring only if you provided me with a reason to as why I'm a liar. By simply calling me a liar without warrant you offer no further insights and cease cogency. How am I supposed to respond when my only claim to refute is "you are a liar"? It IS proctoring because it puts YOU in control of the argument.
@bluegsp Exactly what argument have you presented? You continue to call me a liar, but you have yet to argue anything. It's just been your rampant name calling and unauthorized proctoring of ideas. If you simply research the Tragedy of Malmedy you would find that Bill got it entirely backwards and desperately tried to salvage ratings by washing his transcript. It's sad to see someone try to earnestly defend something that can't be. It's an exchange of ideas so stop the name calling. Refute me.
@bluegsp Wow, there are a lot of videos where O'Reilly gets played like a violin, but there are none of him actually doing any of the "playing". Try your luck on one of the hundreds of other videos, fool.
@bluegsp As for your discussion, why don't we discuss why you haven't killed yourself yet? You'd be surprised at how bored news paper editors are in shitty, redneck, towns such as yours. They're just dying to write about how some low-life, suicidal, dipshit shot his ugly dog and drowned himself in his own trailer all because he got destroyed in an argument over his piss poor fucking internet. The only joke here is that you're still alive. A brain dead fucking monkey would be a step up from you.
@bluegsp You should check out the other videos of Bill O'Reilly getting destroyed. There all so very entertaining. I'm sure there's got to be someone dumber than you on one of those hundreds of videos, right? Then again...
I know a redneck like you has got to have some guns lying around your house. Why don't you load the nearest shotgun, put it up to your empty head, and watch the dust fly out? How can you be winning arguments on a topic that has already been lost for you? Your dumb, kid. If you kill yourself now you might get a section in the Bumpkin Times written about how no one gives a shit about a tard like you. I can't imagine you having any friends in that armpit of a town you live in. Just your ugly dog.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are. Its time to pull your head out of your ass and let your brain get some oxygen and try to grow up. You have said nothing of any relevance and you are only displaying how vacuous and bereft of intelligence the average liberal is. Run along now and let the grown ups talk. XD
@bluegsp As I seem to recall, you said the same things to me back then as you are saying now. What historical fact could you possibly justify for Bill's odious lie? Did you watch this fucking video? Or do you just assume you know everything and everyone else is therefore dumber than you? Close-minded, ignorant, arrogant, ostentatious people such as yourself are really bringing this country down. You said this was an "exchange" of ideas. So try to be a little open minded, and not so dumb. ;D
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Wake up, jack ass. You are only showing everyone what an idiot you are. Morons and liars are all the qualification required to be a liberal. Thanks for playing along. XD
@bluegsp See? There you go. You continue to proctor as if someone gave you permission and told you your "shit doesn't stink". And again with the name calling. Idiot, jackass (all one word by the way), liar, and moron in only three lines of bullshit? I'll admit, you certainly know and use a lot of useless insults. And I like how you put an "XD" at the end there. It's real cute the way you're trying to convince me you're smiling while losing this argument. I'm winning so I'll put it. XD XD XD XD
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You have no argument, therefore it is impossible for you to win anything except the race to expose your stupidity. (and I will concede that you are winning that race). XD
If you did some research you would find that Olbermann lied about the transcripts and he knows it. You would find that "after" Malmedy as Bill clarified US troops killed unarmed SS prisoners as he said. He was right, Kieth was wrong and you are an idiot.
@bluegsp I have an argument. Here it is: I argue that Bill falsely accused American heroes of being war criminals for something they were the victims of. Now, in order for you to refute this you have to somehow travel back in time and stop this video from happening. It doesn't matter what Bill said happened "after" Malmedy. Bill said during Malmedy Americans killed unarmed SS troops. In the process, slandering 84 fallen American heroes. You are horribly misguided, friend. Your turn. XD
Yes, "nu-huh" is exactly what you have said and why you are a pathetic lying liberal hypocrite. I accept your concession and apology. Now learn from this, you shouldn't go through life a complete idiot.
I do not normally agree with Bill O'Reilly, however, to deny the facts that Americans or in fact any country that deploys troops to war is innocent, and does not commit crimes against humanity is blatant ignorance. Have you forgot the My Lai Massacre, in which between 175 - 200 Vietnamese were murdered without discrimination. What about the torture of many in the Middle East and images we have had to confront of American troops holding the heads of the dead as if they had just won a medal?
Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
@bluegsp No. I just made a point, and you just covered your ears and sang a song. You know what? I'm calling it. This argument is dead. There will never be a solution, because you are just too dense. This has been going on for four FUCKING months, and I will end it. The only thing we can say is Bill O'Reilly misspoke. You somehow deny this. You denied basic facts, showing, once and for all, I won.
The end. Game over, man, game over. Checkmate. Fatality. Critical Hit. KO.
@sportsguy006 Nice try, moron. The facts are on the side of me and Bill, I have exposed you for the lying, incompetent, illiterate, hypocritical liberal propagandist that you are. You have offered little more than a "nu-huh" as a rebuttal. I have given you historical fact and have completely destroyed you. Thanks for demonstrating the ignorance and dishonesty of the average liberal. Quite enlightening.
@bluegsp I just do pot on the weekends. And I get it from "grown ups". Maybe you would know that if you got out of the house more often. I know a redneck like you has got to have some guns lying around your house. Why don't you load the nearest shotgun, put it up to your empty head, and watch the dust fly out? How can you be winning arguments on a topic that has already been lost for you? Your dumb, kid. I wish I lived in the fairy tale land that you do. Then I wouldn't need drugs. WIN X'D
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR How would the frequency of me leaving my house give me any insight to how often you do drugs? It is appearant that you are the one living in a "fairy tale land" or more accurately, a drug induced psychosis. You are an idiot.
@bluegsp It's apparent that you can't spell "apparent". So what? Get at me, kid! OWN3D... and RAP3D1 X'D hahahahahajajajajajajajahahahahahahaha.... lmao played, son!
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR This is not a spelling bee, jack ass. It is an exchange of opinions and ideas. You have none of them, therefore it is you that is the biggest loser. You have been destroyed again just has you have been destroyed every time you post your childish insane babblings.
@bluegsp How am I the loser when you've been commenting on the same videos for a little over a year now? Why don't you save us all the suspense and just kill yourself now? Nobody likes you. Why don't you try your luck on any of the other videos in the list of "suggestions"? I'm sure there's got to be at least one of them where Bill isn't made a fool of. Get a life, loser.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR "nobody likes" me? what are you, 6 years old? Am I not invited to your birthday party now? I love it when you idiots humiliate yourself right after I humiliate you. I call that a "bonus". XD
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR It doesn't hurt me exposing your childish ignorance. We can't really call this an argument because you have failed to present a single intelligent idea. What a pathetic loser. XD
@bluegsp I like how you keep calling me a "loser" when you've been commenting nonsense on the same video for over a year now. (And you have yet to win).You define what it means to be insignificant. So far all you've proven to be good at is a). denying simple, presentable fact b). smashing buttons on a computer in a desperate attempt to cart away your refutable b.s. and c). playing a redneck that has absolutely no idea what he's saying. You're good at all those things. You're welcome.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are the loser, you are the biggest loser. Because people send me messages that are relevant to the video and then we have a discussion. You on the other hand had your ass handed to you by me a long time ago and you have not been able to address the issue since. I present historical facts to back up my argument and all you can do is name call. You are a pathetic immature little shit stain without a clue about anything you talk about. You are a joke. XD
@bluegsp Don't even give me that bullshit. Name calling? Really? You are insulting anyone who disagrees with you. Simply telling them they're a stupid liberal (I'm neither of those things so, naturally, I wasn't offended) and proctoring arguments instead of participating in them. But for you to blame the name calling entirely on me is just nonsense. For one thing, I offered you the insightful suggestion to kill yourself. I also called you a redneck and said your dog was ugly. Both are true.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR No, I have presented an argument, you have not. You are an unintelligent lying liberal retard and this bullshit is all you know. I suggest that you do the world a favor and kill yourself. See? I can get in the gutter right along side of morons like you because I enjoy exposing the vile, and retarded nature of the average liberal. You have nothing of interest to say and it is important that the world see's it.
@bluegsp Don't you think it's ironic that I have nothing of interest to say, but the world must someone still need to see it? Therefore, what I'm saying MUST be of interest to people if it becomes necessary for others to see it?Regardless of whether or not you pick up on the irony, I find it laughable that you somehow think the entire world is spectating an internet quarrel between a college student and a hillbilly. Step off your pedestal.
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR No, its not "ironic" (obviously that is another word that you don't know the meaning of), and your sentence makes no sense. (that is the true irony). People have been sending me comments for a year on this video, so a lot of people see it, and since it is on the web, it is available for the whole world to see. More demonstrations of your stupidity. XD
@bluegsp So, everyone in the world has a working internet connection? What a fictitious world you live in. I refuse to believe that YouTube is available for the whole world to see. Get a clue. And it is ironic. All irony is is a difference in meaning between what is said and what is meant. You said I had nothing interesting to say, but at the same time you said the whole world needs to see what I'm saying. This is both dramatic irony and situational irony. Don't take my word for it. Look it up.
WHAT? First, I see what you attempting at the "parsing" of words (Although in this case, simple listening exposes the gross error). I made no error. Lets say I am a poor communicator. How does that make me a liar? You are delusional, good sir.
@sportsguy006 "...see what you attempting at..." another example of poor grammar and proof that no one would pay for this childish drivel that you put out. If you did "study" English, you should get your money back, you got screwed. All evidence that you are a liar. Of course maybe Bill wasn't as clear as he would have liked to be, but he clarified it and history bears him out. Again you and your BFF, Keith are proven a liars.
@sportsguy006 You have said nothing more than the equivalent of "nu-huh", and that is your entire argument. I have proven that you are a stupid lying hypocrite. I have proven that Kieth lied, I have proven that Bill was correct. It is you that "have nothing" and you know it. You have been destroyed in every possible way, yet I am sure that you will come back and hand me more ammunition. XD
@bluegsp Look at what I said several comments ago. Speaking of saying "Nuh-Uh," that was essentially your entire argument. You kept saying you proved things, but never did, just repeatedly said you did. Look, this argument is dead. You are suborn and immovable, almost as stubborn as I am. No one can win, and unless we bring in a unbiased third party (we will not) its a hilarious stalemate. Now go back to your life
@sportsguy006 Of course I proved my argument, What Keith was referring to was the revenge killings at Chernogne that happened because of Malmady. That is proof retard. Now you are just reduced to repeating what I say. I have clearly destroyed you more times than I can count and you are just too stupid to know how ridiculously childish you are. You are a liar, a fraud, an idiot and a hypocrite. These are also facts that I have proven.
@bluegsp No, that is not a fact. You keep saying you proved he meant that, but that is impossible to prove. All you can say is what he said, which supports my point. You have nothing. You are the worst debater I have ever seen, I imagine that you are a poor public speaker too, just talking in massive circles and trying to sound smart.
@sportsguy006 No, it isn't. Look it up. The Marines at Haditha were accused of "revenge killings". "After" Malmedy, at Chenogne, US Troops killed unarmed SS prisoners in revenge for Malmedy. That is fact, that is proof, that is game, set and match, I win, you lose, end of story. You have been destroyed, humiliated and exposed for the lying, hypocritical, idiot, fraud that you are. And you have never sold anything that you have written, that is lie as well.
@bluegsp I'm not arguing that. I stated that it is a fact that O'Reilly did not say "after." You can not prove he meant after. Try to. It is impossible, and any attempt to is mere stipulation. I love how you have "exposed me." Lmao, if you don't believe it, its not true! What a life you must lead
@sportsguy006 He did say "after" when he clarified his statement to a viewer that was confused. Since historical fact proves him correct with his clarification, that is proof that he meant "after" in the first place. There, I have proven it and it wasn't very difficult. But your weak and pathetic mind thought it was impossible. That proves that you have not "studied" English", you could not have written anything that anyone would care to purchase, and that you are an idiot.
@bluegsp Yes, he said "after" later in a desperate attempt to save his ass. Historical facts would have "proved him right" if there was a massacre at all. But he got the place dead wrong. What you did is not proof, as I just tore threw it like toilet paper.
@sportsguy006 "desperate"? He sounded "desperate" to you? You are the one sounding "desperate". Historical fact did prove him right, you cannot deny that. Your lame attempt to parse his words only make you and Kieth look like the idiots that you are. The only thing you "tore" through was the remains of your weak mind
@bluegsp Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
@bluegsp Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
It is grammatically correct, and i cannot believe we are arguing this. Look, I WOULD apologize if I did accuse you of not being a good public speaker. Now, I will accuse you of being a mindless, conscienceless, skull-fucking douchebag, who cannot read at an eighth grade level.
I am a published author. I studied literature, form, and composition for many years. Yes, I have made typos in this slapfight, but that, most certainly, was grammatically correct.
True MSNBC is always right and naturally Olbermann is always correct. I watch news from all of the networks sift out the BS and use my brain to sort it out. Unfortunately Olbermann's obsession with Fox news is scary. I never agree with O'Reilly all the time.
I have heard Bill O praise Obama for some of his actions, when is the last time you heard Olbermann give credit to a republican?
Both networks have agenda's and if don't think so you are living under a rock.
Lmao, I didn't even know Gore had a station before today. But you are obviously grasping for straws here. Look, I said multiple, MULTIPLE times I do not even like Olbermann. I rarely watched. However, He is RIGHT here. Olbermann resigned, although many CLAIM he was fired. You are just saying the same thing over and over again. You are just embarrassing. People like you are the reason why so many people think conservatives are narrow minded idea
@sportsguy006 Thats my point, Olbermann will disappear into obscurity where he belongs. Olbermann is not right, he is a liar and that is why he was fired from MSNBC, (even they were embarrassed by him). Bill was correct, history has proven him correct. As Olbermann and Clark fade away, karma has proven him correct. I know you are confused because you have no one to tell you what to think right now, but it could be a good opportunity to start thinking for yourself. XD
@bluegsp Wow. I'm speechless. Please, please, please look what I said. I did not watch Olbermann. If Olbermann is fading away, why are you still fucking talking about him. He was not fired. Please read before speaking
@sportsguy006 Yes, you do need comprehension skills. Along with a basic education and common sense orientation. good luck with all that, you have your work cut out for you.
@bluegsp Okay. Wow. There we go. It has boiled down to this. Well, thats the closest thing you will ever get to admitting that you were totally wrong. Thanks though! peace out.
@sportsguy006 I will admit that you have been totally wrong and you psychological problems. The facts, history and karma has proven me correct. Every post you make proves you a moron.
@bluegsp Okay, lets look how that last post SHOWS I won. First, you have sunk to playground insults. Second, facts and history have clearly proved you wrong. Third, Karma? Shut the fuck up. Finally, you used moron in a post. Please, please, please look at this exchange.
@sportsguy006 I have, and it is amazing that you still don't get it. This kind of bullshit cost Olbermann his job (Karma), and only serves to make you look like a fool. You have been destroyed and are too stupid to know and don't have the character to admit. What a pathetic moron. XD
@bluegsp Okay, AGAIN, it seems you do less arguing and more just proclaiming you won. You have not given one argument, but every post just called me an idiot and said you won. Now for the eight time, Olbermann was not fired. You are just lying now. Talk about a waste. Just stop this man.
@sportsguy006 Thats because the facts are in and you have no rebuttal. I am the only one in this conversation that has given an argument. Calling you an idiot and a moron is just an observation of your intelligence and character. You can't even come to gripes with the fact that Olbermann was fired. The whole world (including Olbermann) acknowledges that simple fact. You are truly delusional. XD
@bluegsp I DID NOT WATCH OLBERMANN. I DO NOT CARE. IT IS A FACT HE RESIGNED.
Do you get it now?
Honestly, you provided no facts. What facts did you provide? You just said how Olbermann lies. THE FACT is O'Reilly made a mistake, and you openly lied to cover for him.
@sportsguy006 The facts are that there were revenge killings as a result of Malmedy as Bill correctly stated. The facts are that the Marines of Haditha were innocent of any wrong doing contrary to what Clark and Murtha accussed them of. You can pretend you prevailed in this discussion, but just like your idol, Olbermann, you have failed completely. Its been over, but you are too stupid to know it.
@bluegsp Wow. For the tenth time, I don't even like Olbermann. You are just immature, still trying to make a point. Also, O'Reilly simply had the facts wrong, so accused many dead soldiers, which, contrary to your belief is WRONG.
@sportsguy006 Your comprehension cannot be this bad, so I must assume you are just a liar. You have so much in common with your hero Kieth Olbermann. I don't blame you for denying it, but you can't hide it.
@bluegsp Lol, nice try. You had me going for a while, with your failure to admit even little points. I mean, if someone was this fucking stupid they would have died in a hunting accident by now. Good job!
@sportsguy006 It is obvious that you are in love with Olbermann or you would not spend this kind of time defending him. It is also obvious that you have no moral character or you would not feel compelled to lie at every opportunity when the truth has hit you so blatantly in the face.
@bluegsp Well finally you addressed the issue instead of just saying it blindly. I am not lying, I have given evidence, and your explanation that O'Reilly implied the massacre aftermath is ridiculous and a blatant lie.
So why would I, someone who does not even like Olbermann, defend him? You said it: morality. Olbermann is right HERE. Show me many other videos, and he'll probably be wrong. But here, he is absolutely right. You cant look at the facts because you hate his overall politics. Idiot.
@sportsguy006 You are the idiot, with no moral character. You have given no evidence. O'Reilly clearly states that "after" malmedy the revenge killings occurred. Kieth knows no one can alter the transcripts but the company that writes them because it's the same company that does his show. This was a pathetic attempt at a gotcha moment that failed miserable and you are too stupid to understand it. I have proven once again that you and Kieth are liars and idiots. admit it, you are in love with him
@bluegsp I gave you evidence time and time again. I will not state it here, as there is a character limit. Where does O'Reilly state he was referring to AFTER malmedy? He doesn't, until weeks later when it was pointed out.
The fact that you keep saying that I love olbermann shows you have no argument. Interesting that I, Olbermann, and Clark are all liars, but O'Reilly is a FUCKING SAINT.You are a rabid conservative who can no longer look at objective facts.
@sportsguy006 You haven't given any evidence except that you are brainless idiot. Olbermann is a liar, Clark was wrong and you are still and idiot. I have proven it to you, but your blinded love for him has rendered you unable to comprehend it. I mean really, where are they now? Bill still has his show and his sterling reputation. Olbermann and Clark have faded away without their dignity onto the ash heap of history. You really are dense aren't you. XD
@bluegsp Evidence? Again, idiot, my evidence is clear: THE WORDS COMING OUT OF OREILLYS MOUTH. You cannot, I repeat cannot dispute that. All I am saying is OReilly made a stubborn mistake. Move away from Olbermann. It is irrelevant that he is involved. Clark faded away? What? He was a retired general, and actually made a run for president. Its stupid to attack Clark.You are blindly defending Oreily. I love how you don't even acknowledge the rest of my post, as you know I am right. You are hiding
@sportsguy006 I am defending the truth, Bill was right, you, Olbermann and Clark are wrong. Clark was has been discarded as a serious contender for the presidency (even by democrats, and that's saying something). You ignore the context of the discussion that Bill was having with Wesley (because Kieth tells you to) and therefore you really have no idea what you are talking about. Typical Olbermann worshiping liberal moron.
@bluegsp Wow, lol. First, one of first points I made, Clark is a retired general. His expertise is military matters, and he is right. The first conversation, on abu ghraib, shows it is very hard to agree with o'rielly. I looked at the transcripts, and it is very straight forward. For once, olbermann did not twist the facts (With the exception of the stupid transcript thing). Now, Clark was not a serious contender, but he was mentioned. Its stupid to say he is "gone," I mean his is retired.
@sportsguy006 How the hell can you say Clark was right when he was most definitely wrong? I don't think you did look up the ]"transcripts" because there is no disputing how wrong he was. He said that the Marines at Haditha murdered civilians out of revenge because they couldn't handle the stress that that the Bush Iraq war policies put them under. That was total bullshit, the marines were found to have acted professionally and within the rules of engagement.
@bluegsp You took his quote totally, totally out of context. First, he did not "pull this up." He said he had sources and he had no reason to lie. He believed firmly these men MURDERED civilians. Now, O'Reilly said that 95% of soldiers were performing heroically, with a small amount disgracing the nation. Clark corrected him, saying it was probably 99.5%. This is SUPPORT of the military, just not certain individuals. The evidence at the time pointed strongly towards murder.
@bluegsp Neither Olbermann in this video, or Clark in the initial interviews even implied Bush being involved. Clark is a revered general, and has retired. Olbermann, again, resigned. Please look it up. Now, I can fairly say Democrats do not embrace O'Reilly. Its funny that you mention how much a love Olbermann, when you clearly worship O'Reilly. Now, why didn't this get coverage. Honestly, Its not THAT big of a national news happening, but, shockingly, it did get coverage!
@sportsguy006 I revere the truth. And it is clear that you, Clark and Olbermann have distain for it. Wesley and John Murtha attempted to exploit the Haditha incident to attack Bush on the war. They threw those Marines under the bus to score political points. They were dead wrong and now they are gone. I know that you are not that stupid that you can't understand it, so that leaves me with the only other conclusion is that you are a liar.
@bluegsp That is a flat out lie on your point. Let's face it, I made a valid point. Murtha and Clark both fought for what is right, not fighting for points. You have no evidence. Also, your "argument" is not very relevant to the issue. Let me redirect you here. We are talking about O'Reilly's error, which he made three times. You ignore that and go to a non related issue. O'reilly is wrong here, that is all.
I also lovve how you completely ignored what I saidl. It just proves you have nothing
@sportsguy006 I can't believe what an idiot you are. The Marines at Haditha were accused of "revenge killings". After Malmedy, US soldiers engaged in "revenge killings" at Chernonge. That is Bill's point and he is correct. US politicians did not use the Malmedy incident to criticize Roosevelt. That would be "exploitation". Murtha said "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood." No lies by me, just you Clark and Murtha.
@bluegsp In the icident on O'Reilly Bush was not mentioned. He was not implied. You are looking for things here. Also, again, O'reilly said nothing to indicate he was referring to AFTER Malmedy. Please, if he was, show me where. Also, the point you are saying he makes his totally idiotic. You are saying he accepted them as revenge killings, and pointed out they were ignored in WWII. You are just embarrassing yourself.
@sportsguy006 thanks for demonstrating that you can only acknowledge the context that Kieth force feeds you here. That is confirmation that you cannot think for yourself. At 6:18 Bill clarifies "After Malmedy". Clark said this has never happened before, Bill lists examples where it had, he is not accepting anything, he is giving the military the benefit of the doubt as guaranteed in the constitution, Clark is not. I cannot make this more simple for you. You really are stupid.
@bluegsp I knew you would give me that. The comment at 6:18 was after the fact, and THERE he should have apologized for his awful comment and hung his head. O'Reilly voluntarily named MALMEDY with Iwo Jima and the Battle of the Bulge. Thy make no sense: killing captured soldiers to great battles. Besides, even the killings of captives is incompatible to killing civilians.
Also, where the fuck does it say we must give the military the benifit of the doubt in the constitution.
@sportsguy006 Of course I did, that's the question you asked. He should not have apologized, he clarified. It makes perfect sense and is the logical analogy that he was attempting. Incompatible"? Now you are arguing degrees and you would be no more successful at that than Clark was.
Perhaps you should read the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, which are all based in English Common law going all the way back to the Magna Carta. Our whole system of government is based on it
@bluegsp Perfect Sense? Go to 3:51. Now how can that be misinterpreted? Its explicit. Besides, this was the second time he made this error. Now, O'Reilly's point on Abu Gharib is stupid as hell.
No where in those amendments does it say that we should give the military the benefit of doubt. I'm not sure what you are referencing in the constitution. I mean, you were referencing probably cause, which it was determined they had... AFTER INVESTIGATION.
@bluegsp In V and XIV I think you were going for "Innocent until proven guilty." First of all, that is not in the Constitution, but generally refers to our legal system. If you think Clark violated this, then you clearly do not understand. "Innocent until Proven guilty" is for the LEGAL system. I can say "Your IQ is in the high 60's" and it does not inflict upon any legal rights. However, if you were brought to court, the jury can not think your IQ is in the mid 60's until you are tested.
@sportsguy006 I am talking about giving the Military the benefit of the doubt, not legal jeopardy, retard. Clark and Murtha were convicting these Marines in the media before any investigation was done. You really have gone far afield to attempt to support your untenable position. Since this little exchange between Clark and O'Reilly are beyond your comprehension, I don't expect you to understand the complexities of our constitution. O'Reilly destroyed Clark here, and he has faded away.
@bluegsp Wow. This was your death post. First, my assumptions on what you were saying were merely guesses at what you could have been saying. Why guesses? Because, again, that is absolutely not in the constitution. This is literally a joke. Not only that, you prove to have no idea what jeopardy is, besides a game show. Look it up, and see why your statement was ridiculous.
Finally, with Clark, he is a retired general. He was never a big political figure. He really never faded from anything.
@sportsguy006 Must you continue to demonstrate you stupidity with every post? You keep trying to change the subject because you keep getting your ass kicked. The problem is, you make yourself look even more stupid with you nonsensical rant. Clark ran for president, that makes him a politician, he is not even consulted on military matters anymore because of his stupid anti military partisan remarks. he has faded into the ash heap of history. Kieth is gone, Bill is still no#1. hurt's, huh?
@bluegsp Changing the subject? I replied to every aspect of your post, and I always do. You just changing the subject. What about the constitution, which derails your entire argument? Clark was a minor candidate and is revered as a military figure. I did a quick search and saw the your BBF O'Reilly invited him on several times. Why would the man, the god, have him on? He is not anti-military. That is stupid to say. He fought for years, and he thinks all deserve justice and will charge anyone.
@sportsguy006 Your lack of understanding of how our system of government, only reconfirms your poor comprehension skills that we have established earlier. The rest of you post doesn't make much sense. Suffice to say, Clark has not done any appearances since he has disgraced himself by throwing these marines under the bus to try to score cheap political points. America usually rejects such poor character like your boyfriend Olbermann and Clark and you don't hear from them again.
@bluegsp What do I not understand. Please, please, please show me where in the constitution the military are granted the benefit of the doubt, without proper investigation. You can't? What a shock. You literally just lied about Clark. He appeared on the show MANY times afterward, most recently in 2010, showing you are alone in this stupid thought. I'm interested to see how you can lie about these two points...
@bluegsp Also, its worth pointing out that I saw that you commented on another Olbermann Oreilly video, and are badly losing a battle there. You are probably in several others. So, you are either a rabid hater of Olbermann, refusing to admit he is right in the most obvious of situations, or secretely want to jack off O'Reilly under his desk, and will lie to cover him up. Or both!!
You bring up how I love olbbermann, but you so clearly love O'Reilly. I just hate both.
People, wake up. CNN, FOX, MSNBC... They all spew the same BS. If I were to roast Bill I could have done a MUCH better job. They are all full of shit. It's all red vs blue, repubs vs demos, left vs right. It's a paradigm. None of them ever talk about the real issues.
Ron Paul 2012.
SupurNinja 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you a good person?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust u have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
standingontruth1 2 months ago in playlist bill o reilly
Fox news can eat a dick
Ostnizdasht206 3 months ago
The majority of American and British cannot spell correctly.The majority of people i have met from Europe and North Africa can speak 2 or 3 languages.We seem to be being kept dumb for some reason,a legacy of Bush and Blair perhaps.Or as i call them,Dos Tonto Cabrons
bonesandanne 5 months ago
LOL
we know that
It's documented.... and yet its wrong lol wtf.
iiTzHiiGHSToRiiEZ850 5 months ago
come back keith :'(
BlackIce700 6 months ago
Olberman you are just a concieted yank cunt!!!!
bream34 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HELP SPREAD THE WORD! GOVERNOR JINDAL UNDER FIRE AS POLITICAL SCANDAL IS BREWING!! LOUISIANA MEDIA IS TRYING TO COVER IT UP. JUST GOOGLE SEARCH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE FULL STORY;
DEM LEGAL SCENTS
stevespell2 6 months ago
What's so bad about getting a picture taken with a pair of tighty whities on your head?
eabod 7 months ago
BFD. Drama queens.
eabod 7 months ago
Who is typing onto your teleprompter? Also, since when have you ever gotten behind the troops?
TheTodd1023 7 months ago
It's now so obvious why this pathetic, liberal, retarded jackass was fired. He's an idiot with no class. He's ignorant and stupid, yet poses as an intellectual. He's a tool, moron and dumb ass. Glad to see him go. :-)
MB3Productions 7 months ago
OLBERMAN SUCKS O'REILLY'S FARTS
markstarr66 7 months ago
god look at these comments youtube is a liberal wasteland. haha didn't olberdouche get run outta MSNBC. how embarrassing
JLE102191 7 months ago
@JLE102191 niggers aree 12% of the population, who the hell care
indiansarecheap3 7 months ago
How I miss Keith.
And how I wish I could miss Bill.
rationalmuscle 8 months ago 19
@rationalmuscle Hey, at least Keith got a new show.
RCCrabbman 7 months ago
@bluegsp You're a troll. Plain and simple. Posting comments without any facts to support your remarks is unacceptable in any public forum. It's my OBLIGATION as a rational thinking American to expose your misguided attempts at influencing public opinion by spreading false information and unsubstantiated political rhetoric. Civilized Americans like me who are educated and think rationally about our country's social and political affairs are on to you and all of your pin-headed neo-con friends.
Rattlemneocons 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rattlemneocons You babble on incoherently and with out any evidence of your allegations. You have been intellectually destroyed and now you are reduced to sounding like a whining little bitch. It seems that you are simple too stupid to understand basic conversational English. I have given the source's of the studies and attributed quotes to the people who made them. You seem to be emotionally unstable and unable to successfully converse any topic with out some sort of insane rant. XD
bluegsp 9 months ago
@Rattlemneocons - no it's not. You have a right. It's not your OBLIGATION to correct people. Who gave you that obligation? And why you? Your statement has no facts. Get over yourself.
warhol121 8 months ago
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL READERS: Bluegsp is a troll who NEVER gets the facts straight. Save yourself a lot of grief and dismiss everything this nit wit hayseed simpleton says. He is a brainless gasbag and he is very proud of it. College bound Americans understand how important it is to cite your comments or support your remarks with valid references. This is far too challenging for bluegsp because bluegsp is a high school drop-out.
Rattlemneocons 9 months ago
@Rattlemneocons IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL READERS: Rattlemneocons is an a left wing liar and a complete idiot. He has failed at every attempt to debate me so he has resorted this type of childish stalking. As you notice, he never addresses the issues, only makes outrageous and stupid personal attacks. Pay no attention to such an intellectual lightweight and just spit on him at any opportunity.
bluegsp 9 months ago
Lol at arguments with a troll
dakiller234 9 months ago
Fuck MSNBC and FOX. They're both just huge circlejerks. Try reading a paper instead of watching these biased editorial programs with entertainment value in mind more so than news value.
UWBADGER13 9 months ago
history is written by the winners
DirectorTurnerable 9 months ago
And the "Ministry of Truth" rewrites history in the favor of Fox News
MES0746 10 months ago
@bluegsp I can't believe I have to do this, but here is your original post (I've succumbed to quoting a rampant jackass): "I didn't prove it, UCLA, George Mason University, Chicago University and every other study on the subject has proven it. You have a problem with reality. Learn to think for yourself and stop repeating what lying liberal propagandists tell you." - You. I see only three studies. No where in your post did it mention a PEW Research study. I guess that's another win for me! XD
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@bluegsp "Fox News is the most accurate news network on television"? You must be shrooming. Maybe we aren't reading the same material. Or just maybe you don't quite know how to read yet? Either way you look at it, I just put you over my knee and whaled your uninformed ass. Next time try citing RELATIVE, lucrative examples. And learn how to count. You actually thought there was four studies? Wow. I just think it's funny how you keep calling me an idiot when you're the one making all the errors.XD
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@bluegsp Actually, Three studies, moron (Chicago, UCLA, and George Mason; Wow, get owned. Hoisted by your own baton). The only reason I didn't cite Chicago is because Chicago never did any study that I could find very easily. And as I have explained in the past they are used out of context; UCLA's study was whether or not media is biased and George Mason's study proved Fox to be the #1 competitor for ELECTION RESULTS (which isn't anything to be proud of). You really thought these studies said...
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR FOUR STUDIES, Moron, you neglected The PEW Research Center Study, Jackass! It is you that has been owned over and over again. You have made nothing but "errors" and out right lies. You are the idiot and you prove it with every post. XD
bluegsp 10 months ago
FUCKING A OLBERMANN!!!! O'Reilly is a Fox propaganda tool who doesn't know his ass from his elbow. This ignoramus should be stripped naked, thrown in the street and stoned to death.
informationsponge 10 months ago
Fox News Sucks ass, these guys only work for the republican party..
Fox news is not a news channel they are only a bullshitting network to misguide people for there agenda..
Fox news doesn't no the word respect at all..
These guys never have understood nothing..
Who watches Fox news anymore lol, very few people..
Fox news, there a joke
These guys are dumb ass fucken idiots
bulgarianfish 10 months ago 10
@bulgarianfish "These guys never have understood nothing.." You call them idiots, however that sentence makes you sound like the idiot. Check your sentences, and their fluency before you attack a news station, which still has a huge fan base, for being idiots. You cannot base an entire news station off of one closed minded, illiterate douche-bag. Saying something like that essentially puts you at the same level as 'OReilly. You attack fox news for being right winged while MSNBC is all for a NWO.
CEO92512 6 months ago
I'm libertarian, and Bill misspoke.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are an idiot and Bill was correct. You and Kieth are nothing but liars and I have proven it for both of you.
bluegsp 10 months ago 2
@bluegsp You win. I give up. I have purchased a gun, and am planning to kill myself in your name. I hope to see you in God's GHoly Land. Where I can shit down your bumpkin throat. Good fucking day!
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@bluegsp You proved nothing. You gave two studies that you used out of context. I owned you, and you continue to deny it. You don't know what it means to be libertarian because if you did you wouldn't have said that I deny being liberal. Bill misspoke and the proof is in the video. I have yet to believe that you have even watched this video. I am clearly not an idiot if you have to succumb to name calling.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Four studies, moron. They are not out of context and they prove your ill informed opinion to be nothing but the bullshit that it is. The only thing you have "owned" is the title of Biggest Idiot on Earth. Only the most far left liberal idiots like you would defend this fired moron Kieth in the face of his obvious lies. Bill didn't misspeak, he was correct and I have proven it. You started out with nothing but name calling, so you ARE clearly the idiot. Pwnd again. XD
bluegsp 10 months ago
dude shut up fox is garbage.
ieatnewbs117 10 months ago
@bluegsp Did you say that you concede? Wow, do you even know what that means? If you concede, then that means I win! Wow, you're dumb. You just conceded that I was winning!
You see what I did here? I took your claim out of context and used to my advantage. Such are the maneuvers of Fox news, Bill O'Reilly, and therefore you, too. It's easy to manipulate information. It's believing the truth that seems to be a lot harder for you somehow.
Simply watch the other videos of Bill getting destroyed.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Your parsing of words when it comes to the "World Wide Web" is exactly the dishonesty that is typical of lying liberals like Clinton, Olbermann and you. This is another example of your lies that you falsely state that I don't give reason. Study after study shows that Fox is the most accurate news on television.
This in a nut shell is how I have repeatedly destroyed you and explained your layer after layer of lies and stupidity.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Whoa there! That's a pretty big leap to say that ONE news network is more accurate in EVERY aspect of televised broadcasting. Explain yourself. Are they more accurate in just politics, or did you mean overall they are the most accurate news station? I'm not sure how you can prove either of those claims, or even show me where I can find those so called "studies". It is true Fox news maintains some aspects of truth. It is when they couple it with manipulation that I have a problem with.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR I didn't prove it, UCLA, George Mason University, Chicago University and every other study on the subject has proven it. You have a problem with reality. Learn to think for yourself and stop repeating what lying liberal propagandists tell you. Olbermann is gone, Clark is gone, Bill still dominates the ratings, and you are still an idiot. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp First off, I'm not a liberal. I'm libertarian. Second off, UCLA's study is an Interro called "Is Media Biased?". The article said nothing of one news team being more accurate (collectively speaking of course) than the others. It did however point out a liberal bias in the mainstream media news networks (Fox, CNN, MSNBC). George Mason's study mentioned Fox as the most accurate news network in regards to polling about ELECTION RESULTS. Nothing more. You took these studies out of context.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are a liberal, you just don't want to admit it Every study done on the media shows that Fox is the most accurate and least biased. You have just given example of 2 of them. Keep doing your homework and look into the rest of them and they will show you how stupid and uninformed you are.
bluegsp 10 months ago
@bluegsp Um, o.k. Now how the hell am I supposed to continue the debate from here? All you've done is told me I am not really a libertarian, repeated yourself that Fox is still the most accurate news network on television (obviously ignoring my claims about the studies' context), and then you just insulted me. What does Fox's integrity have anything to do at all with what Bill said? Bill misspoke. No study from any school will tell you otherwise, man. Stick to the issues. Stop with the insults.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Look up the word "Hypocrite" and you will see your picture. Bill didn't misspeak, you poor intellectual skills didn't understand him, and then when he clarified for you, you refused to understand because your hero Kieth told you not to. You choose not to believe the numerous studies that I have placed in front of you because it doesn't fit your narrative. You are a Liberal and you refuse to admit it. That is dishonest and makes you a liar.
bluegsp 10 months ago
@bluegsp Because I believe in the minimization of state affairs and local government entities, I am not a liberal. I am a libertarian. And I looked at your studies (they are impressive studies in their own aspects, but have virtually nothing to do with overall accuracy; how would one begin to measure overall accuracy? News teams don't all cover the same stories). And why would Bill need to clarify anything if he didn't misspeak in the first place? Can we first agree that he did misspeak?
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 10 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are a liberal and you are ashamed to admit it. If you were a libertarian, you would agree with Bill. You have no objectivity if you can listen to this moron, Olbermann and give his rant even a shred of credibility. Any thinking person would hear what Keith is saying and say "I can't believe it.", unless you are predisposed to grasp at anything to smear O'Reilly. Just because Bill wasn't as clear as he could have been in this 5 second analogy, doesn't mean he misspoke.
bluegsp 10 months ago
@bluegsp Instead of offering insights you just stop all debate and scorn your opponent for being a "lying a liberal". This is a textbook example of proctoring an argument. What do I got to do? Spell it out for you. Jesus, man.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR I have followed the discussion where you have taken it, moron. You start out attacking me and ignoring the topic, I attacked back and destroyed you. When you finally got around to addressing the video, (in your post from 6 hours ago), I replied and destroyed you again. You have no grasp of the English language, you don't know what you are talking about. (When I expose your lies, then call you a liar, that is not "proctoring", it is stating a fact.) What an idiot. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp You'll have to forgive me for attacking you. But you happen to be a huge target. Though I am unaware exactly how you've destroyed me. And, yes, it is still proctoring. It wouldn't be proctoring only if you provided me with a reason to as why I'm a liar. By simply calling me a liar without warrant you offer no further insights and cease cogency. How am I supposed to respond when my only claim to refute is "you are a liar"? It IS proctoring because it puts YOU in control of the argument.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@bluegsp Exactly what argument have you presented? You continue to call me a liar, but you have yet to argue anything. It's just been your rampant name calling and unauthorized proctoring of ideas. If you simply research the Tragedy of Malmedy you would find that Bill got it entirely backwards and desperately tried to salvage ratings by washing his transcript. It's sad to see someone try to earnestly defend something that can't be. It's an exchange of ideas so stop the name calling. Refute me.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Your inappropriate and incorrect use of the "proctoring" is yet another example of yours stupidity. Keep going, this is fun. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Look it up, dumbass.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@bluegsp Wow, there are a lot of videos where O'Reilly gets played like a violin, but there are none of him actually doing any of the "playing". Try your luck on one of the hundreds of other videos, fool.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@bluegsp As for your discussion, why don't we discuss why you haven't killed yourself yet? You'd be surprised at how bored news paper editors are in shitty, redneck, towns such as yours. They're just dying to write about how some low-life, suicidal, dipshit shot his ugly dog and drowned himself in his own trailer all because he got destroyed in an argument over his piss poor fucking internet. The only joke here is that you're still alive. A brain dead fucking monkey would be a step up from you.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
When I read the title of this video I was expecting a much different type of video ;/
CapitalBhoy78 11 months ago
@bluegsp You should check out the other videos of Bill O'Reilly getting destroyed. There all so very entertaining. I'm sure there's got to be someone dumber than you on one of those hundreds of videos, right? Then again...
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
I know a redneck like you has got to have some guns lying around your house. Why don't you load the nearest shotgun, put it up to your empty head, and watch the dust fly out? How can you be winning arguments on a topic that has already been lost for you? Your dumb, kid. If you kill yourself now you might get a section in the Bumpkin Times written about how no one gives a shit about a tard like you. I can't imagine you having any friends in that armpit of a town you live in. Just your ugly dog.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are. Its time to pull your head out of your ass and let your brain get some oxygen and try to grow up. You have said nothing of any relevance and you are only displaying how vacuous and bereft of intelligence the average liberal is. Run along now and let the grown ups talk. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp As I seem to recall, you said the same things to me back then as you are saying now. What historical fact could you possibly justify for Bill's odious lie? Did you watch this fucking video? Or do you just assume you know everything and everyone else is therefore dumber than you? Close-minded, ignorant, arrogant, ostentatious people such as yourself are really bringing this country down. You said this was an "exchange" of ideas. So try to be a little open minded, and not so dumb. ;D
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Wake up, jack ass. You are only showing everyone what an idiot you are. Morons and liars are all the qualification required to be a liberal. Thanks for playing along. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp See? There you go. You continue to proctor as if someone gave you permission and told you your "shit doesn't stink". And again with the name calling. Idiot, jackass (all one word by the way), liar, and moron in only three lines of bullshit? I'll admit, you certainly know and use a lot of useless insults. And I like how you put an "XD" at the end there. It's real cute the way you're trying to convince me you're smiling while losing this argument. I'm winning so I'll put it. XD XD XD XD
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You have no argument, therefore it is impossible for you to win anything except the race to expose your stupidity. (and I will concede that you are winning that race). XD
If you did some research you would find that Olbermann lied about the transcripts and he knows it. You would find that "after" Malmedy as Bill clarified US troops killed unarmed SS prisoners as he said. He was right, Kieth was wrong and you are an idiot.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp I have an argument. Here it is: I argue that Bill falsely accused American heroes of being war criminals for something they were the victims of. Now, in order for you to refute this you have to somehow travel back in time and stop this video from happening. It doesn't matter what Bill said happened "after" Malmedy. Bill said during Malmedy Americans killed unarmed SS troops. In the process, slandering 84 fallen American heroes. You are horribly misguided, friend. Your turn. XD
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
Yes, "nu-huh" is exactly what you have said and why you are a pathetic lying liberal hypocrite. I accept your concession and apology. Now learn from this, you shouldn't go through life a complete idiot.
bluegsp 11 months ago
O'Reilly would have made one hell of a Nazi
apotcake13 11 months ago
I do not normally agree with Bill O'Reilly, however, to deny the facts that Americans or in fact any country that deploys troops to war is innocent, and does not commit crimes against humanity is blatant ignorance. Have you forgot the My Lai Massacre, in which between 175 - 200 Vietnamese were murdered without discrimination. What about the torture of many in the Middle East and images we have had to confront of American troops holding the heads of the dead as if they had just won a medal?
rbkwren 11 months ago
Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 You are desperate and pathetic. Bill and I are right, you and Kieth are morons and lying jack ass idiots. Thanks for playing along.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp No. I just made a point, and you just covered your ears and sang a song. You know what? I'm calling it. This argument is dead. There will never be a solution, because you are just too dense. This has been going on for four FUCKING months, and I will end it. The only thing we can say is Bill O'Reilly misspoke. You somehow deny this. You denied basic facts, showing, once and for all, I won.
The end. Game over, man, game over. Checkmate. Fatality. Critical Hit. KO.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 Nice try, moron. The facts are on the side of me and Bill, I have exposed you for the lying, incompetent, illiterate, hypocritical liberal propagandist that you are. You have offered little more than a "nu-huh" as a rebuttal. I have given you historical fact and have completely destroyed you. Thanks for demonstrating the ignorance and dishonesty of the average liberal. Quite enlightening.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Talk about saying "Nuh-huh." That is exactly what I said. Look pal, just walk away. It's done.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
Dude, this guy bluegsp has been commenting on the same video for over a year now! What a loser.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR I have been debating with liberals on alot of videos for over a year and I haven't lost yet. DUH,... WINNING! XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Can I buy some pot from you?
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR Maybe its time you get off the drugs and think about doing a little growing up.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp I just do pot on the weekends. And I get it from "grown ups". Maybe you would know that if you got out of the house more often. I know a redneck like you has got to have some guns lying around your house. Why don't you load the nearest shotgun, put it up to your empty head, and watch the dust fly out? How can you be winning arguments on a topic that has already been lost for you? Your dumb, kid. I wish I lived in the fairy tale land that you do. Then I wouldn't need drugs. WIN X'D
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR How would the frequency of me leaving my house give me any insight to how often you do drugs? It is appearant that you are the one living in a "fairy tale land" or more accurately, a drug induced psychosis. You are an idiot.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp It's apparent that you can't spell "apparent". So what? Get at me, kid! OWN3D... and RAP3D1 X'D hahahahahajajajajajajajahahahahahahaha.... lmao played, son!
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR This is not a spelling bee, jack ass. It is an exchange of opinions and ideas. You have none of them, therefore it is you that is the biggest loser. You have been destroyed again just has you have been destroyed every time you post your childish insane babblings.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp How am I the loser when you've been commenting on the same videos for a little over a year now? Why don't you save us all the suspense and just kill yourself now? Nobody likes you. Why don't you try your luck on any of the other videos in the list of "suggestions"? I'm sure there's got to be at least one of them where Bill isn't made a fool of. Get a life, loser.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR "nobody likes" me? what are you, 6 years old? Am I not invited to your birthday party now? I love it when you idiots humiliate yourself right after I humiliate you. I call that a "bonus". XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp It wouldn't be doing you a bit of good if it turned out that you were arguing over the internet with a six year old now, would it?
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR It doesn't hurt me exposing your childish ignorance. We can't really call this an argument because you have failed to present a single intelligent idea. What a pathetic loser. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp I like how you keep calling me a "loser" when you've been commenting nonsense on the same video for over a year now. (And you have yet to win).You define what it means to be insignificant. So far all you've proven to be good at is a). denying simple, presentable fact b). smashing buttons on a computer in a desperate attempt to cart away your refutable b.s. and c). playing a redneck that has absolutely no idea what he's saying. You're good at all those things. You're welcome.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR You are the loser, you are the biggest loser. Because people send me messages that are relevant to the video and then we have a discussion. You on the other hand had your ass handed to you by me a long time ago and you have not been able to address the issue since. I present historical facts to back up my argument and all you can do is name call. You are a pathetic immature little shit stain without a clue about anything you talk about. You are a joke. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Don't even give me that bullshit. Name calling? Really? You are insulting anyone who disagrees with you. Simply telling them they're a stupid liberal (I'm neither of those things so, naturally, I wasn't offended) and proctoring arguments instead of participating in them. But for you to blame the name calling entirely on me is just nonsense. For one thing, I offered you the insightful suggestion to kill yourself. I also called you a redneck and said your dog was ugly. Both are true.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR No, I have presented an argument, you have not. You are an unintelligent lying liberal retard and this bullshit is all you know. I suggest that you do the world a favor and kill yourself. See? I can get in the gutter right along side of morons like you because I enjoy exposing the vile, and retarded nature of the average liberal. You have nothing of interest to say and it is important that the world see's it.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Don't you think it's ironic that I have nothing of interest to say, but the world must someone still need to see it? Therefore, what I'm saying MUST be of interest to people if it becomes necessary for others to see it?Regardless of whether or not you pick up on the irony, I find it laughable that you somehow think the entire world is spectating an internet quarrel between a college student and a hillbilly. Step off your pedestal.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
@LiLHeLLioNFeVeR No, its not "ironic" (obviously that is another word that you don't know the meaning of), and your sentence makes no sense. (that is the true irony). People have been sending me comments for a year on this video, so a lot of people see it, and since it is on the web, it is available for the whole world to see. More demonstrations of your stupidity. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp So, everyone in the world has a working internet connection? What a fictitious world you live in. I refuse to believe that YouTube is available for the whole world to see. Get a clue. And it is ironic. All irony is is a difference in meaning between what is said and what is meant. You said I had nothing interesting to say, but at the same time you said the whole world needs to see what I'm saying. This is both dramatic irony and situational irony. Don't take my word for it. Look it up.
LiLHeLLioNFeVeR 11 months ago
WHAT? First, I see what you attempting at the "parsing" of words (Although in this case, simple listening exposes the gross error). I made no error. Lets say I am a poor communicator. How does that make me a liar? You are delusional, good sir.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 "...see what you attempting at..." another example of poor grammar and proof that no one would pay for this childish drivel that you put out. If you did "study" English, you should get your money back, you got screwed. All evidence that you are a liar. Of course maybe Bill wasn't as clear as he would have liked to be, but he clarified it and history bears him out. Again you and your BFF, Keith are proven a liars.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Look, a grammar error. That holds no water. Now, look what I said earlier. Grammar doesn't matter. You have nothing.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 You have said nothing more than the equivalent of "nu-huh", and that is your entire argument. I have proven that you are a stupid lying hypocrite. I have proven that Kieth lied, I have proven that Bill was correct. It is you that "have nothing" and you know it. You have been destroyed in every possible way, yet I am sure that you will come back and hand me more ammunition. XD
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Look at what I said several comments ago. Speaking of saying "Nuh-Uh," that was essentially your entire argument. You kept saying you proved things, but never did, just repeatedly said you did. Look, this argument is dead. You are suborn and immovable, almost as stubborn as I am. No one can win, and unless we bring in a unbiased third party (we will not) its a hilarious stalemate. Now go back to your life
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 Of course I proved my argument, What Keith was referring to was the revenge killings at Chernogne that happened because of Malmady. That is proof retard. Now you are just reduced to repeating what I say. I have clearly destroyed you more times than I can count and you are just too stupid to know how ridiculously childish you are. You are a liar, a fraud, an idiot and a hypocrite. These are also facts that I have proven.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp No, that is not a fact. You keep saying you proved he meant that, but that is impossible to prove. All you can say is what he said, which supports my point. You have nothing. You are the worst debater I have ever seen, I imagine that you are a poor public speaker too, just talking in massive circles and trying to sound smart.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 No, it isn't. Look it up. The Marines at Haditha were accused of "revenge killings". "After" Malmedy, at Chenogne, US Troops killed unarmed SS prisoners in revenge for Malmedy. That is fact, that is proof, that is game, set and match, I win, you lose, end of story. You have been destroyed, humiliated and exposed for the lying, hypocritical, idiot, fraud that you are. And you have never sold anything that you have written, that is lie as well.
bluegsp 11 months ago
Comment removed
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@bluegsp I'm not arguing that. I stated that it is a fact that O'Reilly did not say "after." You can not prove he meant after. Try to. It is impossible, and any attempt to is mere stipulation. I love how you have "exposed me." Lmao, if you don't believe it, its not true! What a life you must lead
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 He did say "after" when he clarified his statement to a viewer that was confused. Since historical fact proves him correct with his clarification, that is proof that he meant "after" in the first place. There, I have proven it and it wasn't very difficult. But your weak and pathetic mind thought it was impossible. That proves that you have not "studied" English", you could not have written anything that anyone would care to purchase, and that you are an idiot.
bluegsp 11 months ago
@bluegsp Yes, he said "after" later in a desperate attempt to save his ass. Historical facts would have "proved him right" if there was a massacre at all. But he got the place dead wrong. What you did is not proof, as I just tore threw it like toilet paper.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
@sportsguy006 "desperate"? He sounded "desperate" to you? You are the one sounding "desperate". Historical fact did prove him right, you cannot deny that. Your lame attempt to parse his words only make you and Kieth look like the idiots that you are. The only thing you "tore" through was the remains of your weak mind
bluegsp 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bluegsp Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bluegsp Lmfao. Tore through my mind? Are you high? Yes, he did sound desperate, in his own way. It was weak nonetheless. I never did deny the historical facts, but he was wrong, and you can't deny that.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
It is grammatically correct, and i cannot believe we are arguing this. Look, I WOULD apologize if I did accuse you of not being a good public speaker. Now, I will accuse you of being a mindless, conscienceless, skull-fucking douchebag, who cannot read at an eighth grade level.
I am a published author. I studied literature, form, and composition for many years. Yes, I have made typos in this slapfight, but that, most certainly, was grammatically correct.
sportsguy006 11 months ago
True MSNBC is always right and naturally Olbermann is always correct. I watch news from all of the networks sift out the BS and use my brain to sort it out. Unfortunately Olbermann's obsession with Fox news is scary. I never agree with O'Reilly all the time.
I have heard Bill O praise Obama for some of his actions, when is the last time you heard Olbermann give credit to a republican?
Both networks have agenda's and if don't think so you are living under a rock.
Bossmanpc 11 months ago
keith oberman is a peice of shit and deserves to get his ass beat
theangrybrit1776 1 year ago
Olbermann is just mad because Bill O Reilly gets 4 times the viewers he gets.
Darnter 1 year ago
It's funny how liberals might use past doings of america to proove that war is dirty and we shouldn't be involved..
And how (neo)conservatives use it to proove it is nothing new, and we shouldn't get upset..
WDF!
thefakeyeti 1 year ago
I love Keith Olbermann.
colafroggy 1 year ago
that was great
TheJoyfulPianist 1 year ago
I hate O'Reilly. I hate FOX
AngeloBaetiong 1 year ago
o'reilly = troll
asdfasdf8904 1 year ago
Lmao, I didn't even know Gore had a station before today. But you are obviously grasping for straws here. Look, I said multiple, MULTIPLE times I do not even like Olbermann. I rarely watched. However, He is RIGHT here. Olbermann resigned, although many CLAIM he was fired. You are just saying the same thing over and over again. You are just embarrassing. People like you are the reason why so many people think conservatives are narrow minded idea
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Thats my point, Olbermann will disappear into obscurity where he belongs. Olbermann is not right, he is a liar and that is why he was fired from MSNBC, (even they were embarrassed by him). Bill was correct, history has proven him correct. As Olbermann and Clark fade away, karma has proven him correct. I know you are confused because you have no one to tell you what to think right now, but it could be a good opportunity to start thinking for yourself. XD
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Wow. I'm speechless. Please, please, please look what I said. I did not watch Olbermann. If Olbermann is fading away, why are you still fucking talking about him. He was not fired. Please read before speaking
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Apology accepted.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Wait what? Again, as you would say, comprehension skills are needed
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Yes, you do need comprehension skills. Along with a basic education and common sense orientation. good luck with all that, you have your work cut out for you.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Okay. Wow. There we go. It has boiled down to this. Well, thats the closest thing you will ever get to admitting that you were totally wrong. Thanks though! peace out.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I will admit that you have been totally wrong and you psychological problems. The facts, history and karma has proven me correct. Every post you make proves you a moron.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Okay, lets look how that last post SHOWS I won. First, you have sunk to playground insults. Second, facts and history have clearly proved you wrong. Third, Karma? Shut the fuck up. Finally, you used moron in a post. Please, please, please look at this exchange.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I have, and it is amazing that you still don't get it. This kind of bullshit cost Olbermann his job (Karma), and only serves to make you look like a fool. You have been destroyed and are too stupid to know and don't have the character to admit. What a pathetic moron. XD
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Okay, AGAIN, it seems you do less arguing and more just proclaiming you won. You have not given one argument, but every post just called me an idiot and said you won. Now for the eight time, Olbermann was not fired. You are just lying now. Talk about a waste. Just stop this man.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Thats because the facts are in and you have no rebuttal. I am the only one in this conversation that has given an argument. Calling you an idiot and a moron is just an observation of your intelligence and character. You can't even come to gripes with the fact that Olbermann was fired. The whole world (including Olbermann) acknowledges that simple fact. You are truly delusional. XD
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp I DID NOT WATCH OLBERMANN. I DO NOT CARE. IT IS A FACT HE RESIGNED.
Do you get it now?
Honestly, you provided no facts. What facts did you provide? You just said how Olbermann lies. THE FACT is O'Reilly made a mistake, and you openly lied to cover for him.
My friend, this is over.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 The facts are that there were revenge killings as a result of Malmedy as Bill correctly stated. The facts are that the Marines of Haditha were innocent of any wrong doing contrary to what Clark and Murtha accussed them of. You can pretend you prevailed in this discussion, but just like your idol, Olbermann, you have failed completely. Its been over, but you are too stupid to know it.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Wow. For the tenth time, I don't even like Olbermann. You are just immature, still trying to make a point. Also, O'Reilly simply had the facts wrong, so accused many dead soldiers, which, contrary to your belief is WRONG.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Your comprehension cannot be this bad, so I must assume you are just a liar. You have so much in common with your hero Kieth Olbermann. I don't blame you for denying it, but you can't hide it.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Lol, nice try. You had me going for a while, with your failure to admit even little points. I mean, if someone was this fucking stupid they would have died in a hunting accident by now. Good job!
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 It is obvious that you are in love with Olbermann or you would not spend this kind of time defending him. It is also obvious that you have no moral character or you would not feel compelled to lie at every opportunity when the truth has hit you so blatantly in the face.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Well finally you addressed the issue instead of just saying it blindly. I am not lying, I have given evidence, and your explanation that O'Reilly implied the massacre aftermath is ridiculous and a blatant lie.
So why would I, someone who does not even like Olbermann, defend him? You said it: morality. Olbermann is right HERE. Show me many other videos, and he'll probably be wrong. But here, he is absolutely right. You cant look at the facts because you hate his overall politics. Idiot.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 You are the idiot, with no moral character. You have given no evidence. O'Reilly clearly states that "after" malmedy the revenge killings occurred. Kieth knows no one can alter the transcripts but the company that writes them because it's the same company that does his show. This was a pathetic attempt at a gotcha moment that failed miserable and you are too stupid to understand it. I have proven once again that you and Kieth are liars and idiots. admit it, you are in love with him
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp I gave you evidence time and time again. I will not state it here, as there is a character limit. Where does O'Reilly state he was referring to AFTER malmedy? He doesn't, until weeks later when it was pointed out.
The fact that you keep saying that I love olbermann shows you have no argument. Interesting that I, Olbermann, and Clark are all liars, but O'Reilly is a FUCKING SAINT.You are a rabid conservative who can no longer look at objective facts.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 You haven't given any evidence except that you are brainless idiot. Olbermann is a liar, Clark was wrong and you are still and idiot. I have proven it to you, but your blinded love for him has rendered you unable to comprehend it. I mean really, where are they now? Bill still has his show and his sterling reputation. Olbermann and Clark have faded away without their dignity onto the ash heap of history. You really are dense aren't you. XD
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Evidence? Again, idiot, my evidence is clear: THE WORDS COMING OUT OF OREILLYS MOUTH. You cannot, I repeat cannot dispute that. All I am saying is OReilly made a stubborn mistake. Move away from Olbermann. It is irrelevant that he is involved. Clark faded away? What? He was a retired general, and actually made a run for president. Its stupid to attack Clark.You are blindly defending Oreily. I love how you don't even acknowledge the rest of my post, as you know I am right. You are hiding
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I am defending the truth, Bill was right, you, Olbermann and Clark are wrong. Clark was has been discarded as a serious contender for the presidency (even by democrats, and that's saying something). You ignore the context of the discussion that Bill was having with Wesley (because Kieth tells you to) and therefore you really have no idea what you are talking about. Typical Olbermann worshiping liberal moron.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Wow, lol. First, one of first points I made, Clark is a retired general. His expertise is military matters, and he is right. The first conversation, on abu ghraib, shows it is very hard to agree with o'rielly. I looked at the transcripts, and it is very straight forward. For once, olbermann did not twist the facts (With the exception of the stupid transcript thing). Now, Clark was not a serious contender, but he was mentioned. Its stupid to say he is "gone," I mean his is retired.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 How the hell can you say Clark was right when he was most definitely wrong? I don't think you did look up the ]"transcripts" because there is no disputing how wrong he was. He said that the Marines at Haditha murdered civilians out of revenge because they couldn't handle the stress that that the Bush Iraq war policies put them under. That was total bullshit, the marines were found to have acted professionally and within the rules of engagement.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp You took his quote totally, totally out of context. First, he did not "pull this up." He said he had sources and he had no reason to lie. He believed firmly these men MURDERED civilians. Now, O'Reilly said that 95% of soldiers were performing heroically, with a small amount disgracing the nation. Clark corrected him, saying it was probably 99.5%. This is SUPPORT of the military, just not certain individuals. The evidence at the time pointed strongly towards murder.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@bluegsp Neither Olbermann in this video, or Clark in the initial interviews even implied Bush being involved. Clark is a revered general, and has retired. Olbermann, again, resigned. Please look it up. Now, I can fairly say Democrats do not embrace O'Reilly. Its funny that you mention how much a love Olbermann, when you clearly worship O'Reilly. Now, why didn't this get coverage. Honestly, Its not THAT big of a national news happening, but, shockingly, it did get coverage!
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I revere the truth. And it is clear that you, Clark and Olbermann have distain for it. Wesley and John Murtha attempted to exploit the Haditha incident to attack Bush on the war. They threw those Marines under the bus to score political points. They were dead wrong and now they are gone. I know that you are not that stupid that you can't understand it, so that leaves me with the only other conclusion is that you are a liar.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp That is a flat out lie on your point. Let's face it, I made a valid point. Murtha and Clark both fought for what is right, not fighting for points. You have no evidence. Also, your "argument" is not very relevant to the issue. Let me redirect you here. We are talking about O'Reilly's error, which he made three times. You ignore that and go to a non related issue. O'reilly is wrong here, that is all.
I also lovve how you completely ignored what I saidl. It just proves you have nothing
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I can't believe what an idiot you are. The Marines at Haditha were accused of "revenge killings". After Malmedy, US soldiers engaged in "revenge killings" at Chernonge. That is Bill's point and he is correct. US politicians did not use the Malmedy incident to criticize Roosevelt. That would be "exploitation". Murtha said "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood." No lies by me, just you Clark and Murtha.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp In the icident on O'Reilly Bush was not mentioned. He was not implied. You are looking for things here. Also, again, O'reilly said nothing to indicate he was referring to AFTER Malmedy. Please, if he was, show me where. Also, the point you are saying he makes his totally idiotic. You are saying he accepted them as revenge killings, and pointed out they were ignored in WWII. You are just embarrassing yourself.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 thanks for demonstrating that you can only acknowledge the context that Kieth force feeds you here. That is confirmation that you cannot think for yourself. At 6:18 Bill clarifies "After Malmedy". Clark said this has never happened before, Bill lists examples where it had, he is not accepting anything, he is giving the military the benefit of the doubt as guaranteed in the constitution, Clark is not. I cannot make this more simple for you. You really are stupid.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp I knew you would give me that. The comment at 6:18 was after the fact, and THERE he should have apologized for his awful comment and hung his head. O'Reilly voluntarily named MALMEDY with Iwo Jima and the Battle of the Bulge. Thy make no sense: killing captured soldiers to great battles. Besides, even the killings of captives is incompatible to killing civilians.
Also, where the fuck does it say we must give the military the benifit of the doubt in the constitution.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Of course I did, that's the question you asked. He should not have apologized, he clarified. It makes perfect sense and is the logical analogy that he was attempting. Incompatible"? Now you are arguing degrees and you would be no more successful at that than Clark was.
Perhaps you should read the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, which are all based in English Common law going all the way back to the Magna Carta. Our whole system of government is based on it
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Perfect Sense? Go to 3:51. Now how can that be misinterpreted? Its explicit. Besides, this was the second time he made this error. Now, O'Reilly's point on Abu Gharib is stupid as hell.
No where in those amendments does it say that we should give the military the benefit of doubt. I'm not sure what you are referencing in the constitution. I mean, you were referencing probably cause, which it was determined they had... AFTER INVESTIGATION.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@bluegsp In V and XIV I think you were going for "Innocent until proven guilty." First of all, that is not in the Constitution, but generally refers to our legal system. If you think Clark violated this, then you clearly do not understand. "Innocent until Proven guilty" is for the LEGAL system. I can say "Your IQ is in the high 60's" and it does not inflict upon any legal rights. However, if you were brought to court, the jury can not think your IQ is in the mid 60's until you are tested.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 I am talking about giving the Military the benefit of the doubt, not legal jeopardy, retard. Clark and Murtha were convicting these Marines in the media before any investigation was done. You really have gone far afield to attempt to support your untenable position. Since this little exchange between Clark and O'Reilly are beyond your comprehension, I don't expect you to understand the complexities of our constitution. O'Reilly destroyed Clark here, and he has faded away.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Wow. This was your death post. First, my assumptions on what you were saying were merely guesses at what you could have been saying. Why guesses? Because, again, that is absolutely not in the constitution. This is literally a joke. Not only that, you prove to have no idea what jeopardy is, besides a game show. Look it up, and see why your statement was ridiculous.
Finally, with Clark, he is a retired general. He was never a big political figure. He really never faded from anything.
\
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Must you continue to demonstrate you stupidity with every post? You keep trying to change the subject because you keep getting your ass kicked. The problem is, you make yourself look even more stupid with you nonsensical rant. Clark ran for president, that makes him a politician, he is not even consulted on military matters anymore because of his stupid anti military partisan remarks. he has faded into the ash heap of history. Kieth is gone, Bill is still no#1. hurt's, huh?
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp Changing the subject? I replied to every aspect of your post, and I always do. You just changing the subject. What about the constitution, which derails your entire argument? Clark was a minor candidate and is revered as a military figure. I did a quick search and saw the your BBF O'Reilly invited him on several times. Why would the man, the god, have him on? He is not anti-military. That is stupid to say. He fought for years, and he thinks all deserve justice and will charge anyone.
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@sportsguy006 Your lack of understanding of how our system of government, only reconfirms your poor comprehension skills that we have established earlier. The rest of you post doesn't make much sense. Suffice to say, Clark has not done any appearances since he has disgraced himself by throwing these marines under the bus to try to score cheap political points. America usually rejects such poor character like your boyfriend Olbermann and Clark and you don't hear from them again.
bluegsp 1 year ago
@bluegsp What do I not understand. Please, please, please show me where in the constitution the military are granted the benefit of the doubt, without proper investigation. You can't? What a shock. You literally just lied about Clark. He appeared on the show MANY times afterward, most recently in 2010, showing you are alone in this stupid thought. I'm interested to see how you can lie about these two points...
sportsguy006 1 year ago
@bluegsp Also, its worth pointing out that I saw that you commented on another Olbermann Oreilly video, and are badly losing a battle there. You are probably in several others. So, you are either a rabid hater of Olbermann, refusing to admit he is right in the most obvious of situations, or secretely want to jack off O'Reilly under his desk, and will lie to cover him up. Or both!!
You bring up how I love olbbermann, but you so clearly love O'Reilly. I just hate both.
sportsguy006