The Foreskin: 15 Square Inches of Erogenous Tissue

[guruvag]

so guys i was searching the internet, im 17 and my penis wont open by itself when errected, i have to open it myself, whys that? is it normal?

[chaoscraig5v7o]

Visit FOREGEN.ORG! A charity that will use stem cells to regrow your foreskin!

[pulsating123]

stopping circumcision is one thing,but what about the people who are already cut? Being comfortable with yourself is really important,and also understanding that you are not your cock! It still feels good, sex is still great for me personally, but moping around and feeling inept, and constantly contemplating about what it could have been like will not get you ANYWHERE.I am against circumcision, absolutely,though I think we also need to address the feeling of ineptness in men and how to banish it

[MoonPhaseHazuki]

i hate my doctor for cutting it when i was little not my parents becasue they didn't cut it

[stirfrypep]

Leave nature alone.  It is there for a reason. Don't hurt your babies! FS for the win, forever.

[Jeffluvs80s]

What is Tantric sex? Sounds good? Could someone come over to my house, and demonstrate it on me? Please?(Preferably a male between the ages of 25 thru 38. I am 29...I would like to know.

[Hesam0000]

Bullshit claim.

I read from another 2 doctors that actually because of those extra nerves the pleasure curve will be reduced and will result in pre-mature ejaculation which destroys the lovelife for both men and women.

[Ikryn]

That is dumb. If the pleasure curve was reduced wouldn't that result in less pre-mature ejaculation as there is less pleasure. Maybe logic is off on holiday.

[HeshimaJameni]

Pleasure (orgasm) and ejaculation are totally different from each other. They need not happen together at all. One is capable and should have multiple orgasms without ejaculation. That is the whole philosophy behind tantric (spiritual) sex.

[Ikryn]

Sure they need not happen together at all, and nothing wrong with tantric sex but for most average males with no training to achieve ejaculation requires orgasm. So harder to get to orgasm, harder to ejaculate, for most average males.

[HeshimaJameni]

No it is the other way round. The objective is not to achieve ejaculation but to achieve orgasm without ejaculation and retain the semen. Therefore it is the orgasm that does not require ejaculation! Tantric orgasm is many times more intense and lasts much longer even after the tantric union itself. Also the sexual energy is not expelled during orgasm by ejaculation but it is transmuted to the crown chakra (the thousand petaled lotus) which is located at the crown of your brain!

[Ikryn]

You miss understand what I said, it had nothing to do with tantric sex, you seem to be hung up on it, im sure it's great. What I am saying for non-tantric sex practicionars, in order to ejaculate they have to orgasm. I know its shocking, but not every guy practices tantric sex. One more time, non- tantric sex practicionars.

[HeshimaJameni]

True. It has nothing to do with tantric sex. But your logic is still twisted here. Generally people aim to orgasm and then ejaculation happens. That is why they associate ejaculation with orgasm, just like Pavlov's dog, unless their intention is to procreate each time they have an encounter!. Likewise, people want to live. And that's why they eat. They don't live to eat... but eat to live. I might be wrong here for it seems many people nowadays seem to live to eat, especially in America!

[endofscene]

@HeshimaJameni What is your opinion on circumcision?

[endofscene]

@Ikryn For cut guys it has been said pleasure is like an on/off switch. Whereas uncut guys have a scale of increasing pleasure which is more controllable.

[endofscene]

@Ikryn Logic needs science. The foreskin is highly enervated erogeous tissue filled with touch-sensitive receptors known as Meisner's Corpulses. This means that not only is there more sensation, and variety of sensation, but also more control. This is because the brain has more data to work with.

[Hesam0000]

@Ikryn The pleasure-curve not pleasure you illiterate dummies.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 Oh well if you read it from another two doctors then it must be right and this video must be "bullshit". Or perhaps Nature knows what she's doing and circumcision is an anti-sexual practice of child abuse. I'd say you're just trying to justify the barbaric practices of your outdated religion.

[Hesam0000]

@endofscene Nature knew what it WAS doing so it created the foreskin to protect the NAKED, PRIMITIVE APE-LIKE men's internal genitals from dirt and germs. Fortunately some of us started wearing clothes a few thousand years ago and created tribes & small villages but no running water or shower to keep clean & then the foreskin became the opposite, it started gathering pre-cum, pee & other germ underneath warm clothes causing deseases. Then came modern societies & bath so now no one gives a shit.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 I don't understand this point at all. So you admit that the glans is an internal organ? So then you admit that removing the foreskin will permanently expose a biologically internal organ, thus creating the possibility of desensitisation?

[Hesam0000]

@endofscene That's not exactly what I said. I gave the reason why people started circumcision and why it was necessary for that time and why it can still be useful and healthy unless the person showers 3 times a day. Yes, the body can handle precum but not the millions of microbes & bacterias that builds up around precum or pee. Just a while ago I was naked for half a day & let my thing hang out :) but by next day I felt burning at the tip of my penis from infection, and it hurt me for 5 days.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 Well, you didn't say it outright, but you implied it. If the eyes are pseudo-internal organs then it is safe to say they would be affected by the permanent removal of the eyelids. It is similar with the penis.

I still don't understand your reason for why you believe people started circumcision. You say it was for physical hygeine. Yet none of the ancient cultures, whether they be tribal, egyptian, jewish, or muslim, have ever given the reason of physical hygeine for circumcision.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 The idea that circumcision is a hygenic measure is a modern invention. It began during the 19th century.

Most men I know do not shower three times a day and yet their penises are fine. The idea that an intact male has to shower three times a day to remain clean is ridiculous. Have you even experienced being intact?

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 The body is full of and covered with microbes. Many of them are either beneficial or neutral. There is no reason to believe that the microbes on and in the penis are more harmful than the microbes anywhere else. A healthy body maintains a healthy balance of healthy microbes.

And you stil haven't addressed my point about vaginas. If penises are so dirty, according to you, then what does that say about vaginas?

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 If you were naked for half a day and then felt burning at the tip of your penis I'd suggest that it is because (1) you are very unhealthy, or (2) because you are circumcised and your glans has no protection, or (3) because of something you were doing to your penis. This is a very peculiar story of yours and it says more about you than it does about penises. I have been naked for half a day before and have had no such problems and my penis is intact.

[Hesam0000]

@endofscene I'm done talking about the penis. I rather talk about vagina.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 I don't understand the rest of your points either. Many primitive tribes still wear little or no clothing, and they have access to natural water sources. Even for people who do wear clothes, they usually have access to natural or artificial water sources. The Romans had aqueducts, remember? Even if a people's did not have access to running water but only still water, they can still clean themselves. And since when is the foreskin so dirty? Pre-cum and pee? Urine is sterile.

[Hesam0000]

@endofscene If you watch the tribal africans, the male usually lifts the penis & places it inside a protective hood or inside a piece of Sumo-wrestler-like cloth, plus they have access to lot more water than Arabs or Jews in Middle-East who encouraged circumcision.Romans lived by the water & they had more rain too being in Europe. Believe me, when people hardly have drinking water they do not shower or clean themselves, I've seen poor villages of Middle-East, Urine is sterile but bacteria isnt.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 Some tribal people don't do anything with the penis. Some lift it up by the foreskin and tie the end to a belt but the penis itself remains uncovered.

Arabs and Jews in the Middle-East have never given physical hygeine as a reason for circumcising. And if they circumcise boys for "hygeine" then you would think they would also circumcise girls.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 The truth is that it would have been way more unhygenic for Jews and Arabs to circumcise their children. This is because they were EXPOSING their children to infection by cutting them open and making them bleed and leaving an Exposed Wound on their genitalia, a wound that would take days or weeks to fully heal and which would be in contact with faeces. Don't forget that they did not have modern surgical tools or antiseptics.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 Additionally, as you point out, they didn't have access to much water. (which I do not know is true, remember the Tigris and Euphrates? The Dead Sea? The Red Sea? The Nile? Etc.)

There is nothing 'hygenic' about performing risky genital surgery on infants and children in Bronze Age Palestine. (In fact there is nothing 'hygenic' about amputating healthy genital tissue, period) Some people even speculate that THIS is precisely the reason for it - not only to dull the sexual sense...

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 (thusly allowing the man to focus more on religion and God), but for parents to prove their allegiance to the tribe by subjecting their most precious possession - their newborn son - to risky and dangerous genital surgery. In fact there is even a law in the Jewish religion which says that if your son DIES because of circumcision then you do not have to circumcise any future sons.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 It is also a known fact that the Israelites under Moses did not circumcise their sons during the 40 years of wandering in the desert. That's FORTY years of wandering in the DESERT. I think water may have been scarce then, yet for some reason this is one of the only times since Abraham that the Jews did NOT circumcise!

Rabbi Maimonides speculates that circumcision arose not because of physical hygeine but for Moral Hygeine (to dull the penis). This makes much more sense.

[endofscene]

@Hesam0000 And if you don't want pre-cum on your dick I guess you can wash it off. But if you don't it's not going to kill you; it's a natural bodily secretion. And for all this talk about the penis being so "dirty", why is there no mention of the vagina?

The truth is that the human body is a self-cleansing organism and given the right nutrition and resources it is able to maintain perfect health. Nothing positive is to be gained by amputating healthy functional tissue. This is truistic.

[rationalway]

The foreskin has more than 20,000 nerve endings! The clitoris has around 8,000!

[kanonekraftschuss]

Bullshit claim. They do not know what they are talking about. The penis is much more sensitive than the foreskin.

[rationalway]

No, the foreskin is!

[HeshimaJameni]

The foreskin is part of the penis. They are not separate!

[endofscene]

@kanonekraftschuss The foreskin is part of the penis! And it is the most highly enervated part. It is pleasurable in itself and also maintains the glans as a pseudo-internal organ. If you cut the foreskin off you lose about 20,000 specialised nerve endings, alot of functional erogenous tissue, and the head of the penis becomes desensitised.

[Hesam0000]

@rationalway  How long did it take you to count the 8000 inside the clit?

[rationalway]

@Hesam0000

another retarded motherfucker.

[bluecafe22]

Circumcised males are 8 times less like to contract HIV, are much less likely to give their partners an STD and they have been found to last much longer in bed. Need I say more??

The only people who argue that circumcision is wrong are those with dirty uncircumcised cocks. 48% of Canadian males are circumcised and 65% of American males are circumcised. There is a reason, you know.

[flyingsaucerscandal]

bluecafe22 said:

"Circumcised males are 8 times less like to contract HIV, are much less likely to give their partners an STD"

Yes, but in the real world, not the hypothetical world, uncircumcised Europe has lower rates of stds and hiv than generally circumcised USA. Maybe the circumcision stuff is propaganda by people who have an interest in keeping it going. Like the people who make money off doing it. Don't look at hypotheticals, look at the reality. Circumcision is a scam.

[Voicetheword]

that higher rate on occures in subjects with poor hygene and the foreskin is there to naturally protect you, if it made things worse for a person your body would none naturally create a foreskin

[endofscene]

@bluecafe22 Yes, the reason is that your country is sexually repressed. That is why secular circumcision was invented in the USA during the 19th century - to negatively impact sexuality.

And FYI there are many thousands of circumcised men who are against circumcision. There are also many females.

[bluecafe22]

dfd

[yoda19hack]

Well im happy with my foreskin :)

[00George00]

So am I :] Wooo!

[Jeffluvs80s]

Fuck you....

[a1mint]

I suspect that the only ones advocating and defending circumcision are the ones that are circumcised themselves and they want to make themselves feel better.

Sorry, but I suggest you move on and forget about it before we'll make you feel worse and worse about it.

[rottentreats98]

well im uncut and i hav to say i dont hav any complaints(and nether does my girl lol)

[DanJZero]

is it better to have sex with foreskin covering the penis head or not?

[a1mint]

The foreskin rolls back, exposing the super sensitive tip that would otherwise be desensitized, had it been circumcised.

[JajaJibbidyJa]

a great video to show to pro circumutilation idiots.circumcision is sexual abuse.dont welcome a little baby boy to the world with a slice to the penis,welcome him with a kiss.

[Youboob99]

Judging by the comments here opposing this barbaric act, I'm fairly impressed with how anti-circumcision sentiment is growing globally.

Keep up the good work folks.

[bagofgoldenhammers]

@Youboob99 ROFL. It's only hated by people that haven't been cut, so obviously us who don't have the skin like it that way.

[Youboob99]

@bagofgoldenhammers It's obviously always you who has no idea what they're talking about. The two are mutually inclusive.

[endofscene]

@bagofgoldenhammers That's incorrect. There are hundreds of thousands of circumcised men all around the world who are totally against circumcision. Many of them are very angry about what happened to them. Do a little research for yourself.

[epmorris]

@endofscene Most Europeans see circumcision as perverse , and would be very angry if this mutilation were done without consent .Without agreement it is plainly wrong and could be viewed as child abuse when inflicted on a child . Surely in America some children sue their parents for this unrequired surgery ?

[endofscene]

@epmorris I agree with you and hope that most Europeans do indeed feel this way. It is true that in the USA some men have filed lawsuits because of circumcision. I think I remember one boy suing his parents (but don't know for sure). I know of at least one man who has successfully sued the hospital he was circumcised at. However, it is difficult for men to sue for circumcision because (1) the statute of limitations means they can only sue up to a certain number of years after the surgery...

[endofscene]

@epmorris (2) they have to be 18, and (3) it can take a lot of time, money, and energy. Additionally it can be embarrassing because you are telling the world that you are not happy with your penis. You also risk attracting a lot of negative attention.

Look up "Circumcised - sues and wins" on youtube for William G. Stowell's story.

[Youboob99]

SexyArtGirl, you're pretty ignorant. How the hell would you know what your bf feels in general, let alone IF HE WERE left uncut? Has your bf had extensive experience with what it feels like to get head with a foreskin? Thought not, therefore it is clearly impossible for his brain to perceive such sensations, and more impossible and ridiculous for you to claim anything of the sort.

[KShunra]

I got serious psychological damages from learning what I was deprived of in my circumcision. One of the grudges I keep against my father. That jerk was the one who talked my motehr into doing it.

That is why I'm trying to spread awareness to the problem (I would also kill mohels, but that's illeagal).

[unclearless]

I want to spread awareness as well, I was lucky not to be cut. However, there are long lived 'old wive's tales' that if not kept clean, it would be HORRIBLE! And is true to some extent. Yet men like myself clean our penis possibly more thouroughly than most. I was raised to do so from that very fear. So your father "May" have thought it was in your best interest. ~Kevin~

[SexyArtGirl]

Having no foreskin makes it easier for my bf to get head...he doesn't seem to notice any lack of pleasure. But i think with my kid i'd let him decide much later and I'd pay for it if he wants the operation.

[ryanmczero]

SexyArtGirl, It's good to hear that you won't have your kid cut. Your BF just isn't self-aware. Eventually the thought arises, what would I feel if I wasn't cut. Just takes time, like the video mentions, and then he might start looking for ways to reverse it. If he's got anything left there's always stretching.

[dan6336]

the uncircumcised penis produces a substance called smegma. a kind of bacteria that keeps you clean and lubricates. without the foreskin the penis over the years will crinkle and parch (kertanization) and your left with a sorry looking thing that itches everytime a thread of clothing cathes your peehole. also, cutting can leave a ring of DISCOLOURATION around the shaft. I used to think it was dirt that wouldnt wash off. thanks doc

[maxivis]

A Gallery of Famous Intact Men

circumstitions com/Famous1.html

[deportmexico]

Until my late teens I thought circumcision was removal of the entire head of the penis, because a friend of mine had freaky J.W. parents who did that to him and he was scared to ask about it but to his friends. I realized later that no its the foreskin, that my parents had done this aweful thing to me. Hmmm lets see, torturing a newborn baby, that might lead to issues with self esteem and parent bonding, right! Explained a lot to me.

[ImNotVeryFat]

Muslims, Jews, Americans, other cihld abusers.. disgusting

[EscapeSociety]

Anyone who promotes circumcision should be made aware of the drawbacks it causes instead of simply believing that the surgical removal of part of the human genitalia provides only benefits and no disadvantages. Those naive enough to accept that need to objectively research the other side of the story.

[farneyblakeley]

Circ of minors is evil. There will be no peace in America and America will not have peace with the rest of the world until this abominable practice is forbidden.

[deportmexico]

I agree. End this freak religious practice! Lets make a PAC to keep our sons INTACT.

[chulopollas]

Cut their balls off instead. The world id overpopulared already. if the pope won't allow condoms maybe that wuill stop all the resources being gobbled up-

[Youboob99]

It's unbelievable how arrogant and "macho" like men can act yet simultaneously approve of the ROBBING of the best sex they can get, way to stand up for yourself.

[Youboob99]

If you think the foreskin is dirty, examine your mouth, the vagina and the large intestine: you'll be shocked, but since people are so uneducated and DELUSIONAL to their losses, I wouldn't be surprised.

What the fuck is wrong with people, why would you cut part of your dick off are you insane? Why do so many guys APPROVE of the theft of their sexual pleasure? Take charge you pussies, enjoy sex like it was meant to be enjoyed.

[Taggra]

Uhm, I happen to like being circumcised, thanks.

[james3d]

Intact men enjoy four times more penile sensitivity than circumcised men, according to the "Fine-touch Pressure Thresholds in the Adult Penis" article published in the British Journal of Urology International, Oct 22 2006. From the conclusion: "Circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis and decreases the fine touch pressure sensitivity of glans penis. The most sensitive regions in the uncircumcised penis are those parts ablated by circumcision."

[ijamsville97]

Heck, I figure if GOD gave it to you,

you likely should KEEP it!

[simplingOG]

"Every other mammal has a foreskin"

Presumably you've wanked off enough animals to be knowledgebale in this subject. The way I see it youse all have more foreskin than you have cocks, we cant hide behind a useless bit of skin like you lot do. UP THE CIRKYS, we will not go away

[endofscene]

@simplingOG It is not a "useless bit of skin". That is precisely the subject of this video.

[eddy187]

Its only dirty to have a foreskin if you dont wash the thing! They want you to think its OK to have a cirky but its not.

[endofscene]

@UTHTURN How would you know that foreskin is "nasty" and "dirty" if you've never experienced having one? And how would you know that if you were intact you wouldn't have better pleasure? I don't think the U.N. is recommending the routine circumcision of infant boys accross the globe, but even if they were since when does anyone respect the U.N.?

[drodga]

It is so sad and I'm sorry it still goes on in the world. Least not here in the UK; I love my foreskin!

[dussault17]

Ouch. I don't even like to cut my toenails.

[6210hardie]

I agree with the 2 previous comments

[yokosmile]

Yep. Circumcision rips away a functioning, yes that is right FUNCTIONING for those of you with thick skulls, part of the penis. It's a human rights violation. Every other mammal has a foreskin to protect the very sensitive head of the penis.

[brianpomona18]

this is so true... the amoint of sensitivity lost isnt even funny... circumcision is barbaric and cruel and is sexual mutilation