Sometimes, it feels like people have selective memory. Interplay/Black Isle are seen as the heroes of the fallout series where Bethesda is seen as making it more generic. Well, say what you will about Bethesda, but if it wasn't for them, Fallout would be dead. Interplay was running it into the ground, ignoring their own cannon and completely shifting the focus of the series.
@SGMZero You are 100% right. I was playing Skyrim and was curious about Bethesda so, I Googled them to find info. Well I started reading and well long story short, it was Bethesda that saved the franchise. I don't see why people would bash on Bethesda and praise Interplay. I mean sure if it wasn't for Black Isle Studios, the game wouldn't have existed. Like myself I had no idea Fallout existed until Fallout 3 came out. Thank goodness for Bethesda for making Fallout 3 the best one yet.
yey for double ranting also what annoyed me was the super mutants were collecting humans for "the master" when he has been dead for like 200 years and they came from a near by vault so they never met the dam guy
@MegaSonicKing what there was only one master the vault opened humans got close to the NPV and turned into super muties there is no new master its a non cannon plot hole
fallout 3 was ok [this is coming from some one who grew up games like doom fallout 1-2 age of empires etc] BUT the thing i was most disappointed about is that it was so 50's fallout 1-2 have a modern day/futuristic feel but you can tell the old world was 50's fallout 3 only had weapons from the 50s [apart from energy and missile] it should had styers and jack hammers and all that and more Easter eggs and had a better engine to me it just felt like an oblivion mod
Maybe because Fallout 3 was made by the same company? Also, how is it not an RPG? It's got all of the RPG elements, quests, inventory, things like that. Personally, I love what Bethesda did with the Fallout franchise, but I would have been happy with Van Buren too. Morrowind and Oblivion were great games too.
@chris12783 what do graphics have to do with anything? F1 and 2 are still epic... if you are a true gamer and appreciate gameplay over eye candy, that is..
Honestly, probably wouldn't be playing fallout 3 if it looked ANYTHING like this. Why anyone ever played video games that were like this beats me. Just my opinion.
@1234yersiman i like both yet the 90s games were easier so you shut your gay ass mouth bethesda is a good company but it is being a dick to black isle and inter play look, the fact your a fag , im smarter, the 90 is better oh and can you help me out by not being a dick but i like fallout 3s story better i give you that
@MegaSonicKing Is Fallout tactics worth playing? I have the Fallout1 &2 + tactics game but I've only played F2.I never played tactics because I heard it was more action orientated (not that it's bad).
I do nto even see how people could possibly be wanting this more than Bethesda's version. HOnestly, I like their version than these RPGs any day. Just makes role-playing seem more immersive if you ask me.
fallout 3 would never be the awesome game it is now if it wasn't for bethesda. do some people really prefer this point and click borefest!? rather than the FPS openworld RPG awesomeness it is now today!! i really gave fallout a try. i love long hour strategy games seriously i do. but when i was playing fallout 1 it feels like i was wasting my time. everything dies sooo slowly oh my freakin GOD! THANK YOU BETHESDA! and FUCK YOU VAN BUREN! any prob with that? shove it up your gay fanboy ass!
@MrMyvince First person is cool, just not for Fallout. It was an innovative attempt, and I admit was kinda neat, but I personally would've preferred if they made it like the others...
@1234yersiman Opinion, bro. Was more widely appealing genre at the time, whereas first person shooters are more the rage now. I like all sorts of games, but personally, I'd just like it better if they stuck to the isometric and slower pace. Not saying Fallout 3 wasn't good at all, though. Still play it to this day. :)
Trying to win people over with sappy music... Its just ironic trying to pay respects to a game that just looks plain bad. I never did like playing from a birds eye view in rpg games its like playing first person view in an Real time strategy its a FAIL plus the graphics are so horrific and cringe worthy.
@BlankMaster000 - Actually birds eye view in RPGS is full of WIN! By the sound of it you probably were just recently born when the greatest RPGs ever made were released: Planescapte Torment and Baldur's Gate II.
@BlankMaster000 And It has nothing to do with nostalgia, it's exactly the opposite, people are just too narrow minded and are not open to creative gaming: YES I HAVE SEEN GOOD REAL TIME STRATEGY IN 1ST PERSON. RPG games in 1st person do look good, but saying that isometric view is not appropriate for RPGs is absurd, it's probably the GENRE THAT SUITS IT THE MOST!
@gmiwoj -You must have been born in the last decade... I'm sad that this kind of mentality governs the way games are made today. Isometric view is AWESOME for some genres, and Fallout 1-2 were so much better than Fallout 3. You cannot compare views just like that. Seriously these kids today... I bet they would prefer chess in 1st person view and with explosions everytime you captured a piece.
well you are wrong, im 26 years old, i played F1 and F2, both twice. i played every good RPG game in history of gaming, and im gonna say it again: isometric view SUCKS BADLY compared to first person view.
fallout is not chess. its an RPG. like in "Role Playing Game", and there is no better way to play role then to see the world with an eyes of your character.
@gmiwoj I do agree with the part that graphics matter. I do not agree that "isometric view SUCKS BADLY compared to first person view", it depends on the game. There are RPGs that I *WANT* to be isometric, in fact I would probably refuse to play them if they weren't. Diablo for instance, it just has to be isometric. Fallout looks good in 1st person sure, but I *LOVE* isometric view in RPGs, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
@KemosabeTBC No... Just no... -.- If I were a good for nothing child I wouldn't even be here or know anything about fallout. Im well aware of all the games and have enjoyed them to some extent. Ok rpg games in a birds eye view were great back in the day but nowadays its all first person and third person. And as for 1st person rts's well anyone who likes them more then isometirc view rts's surely doesn't understand the true concept of real time strategy games...
@BlankMaster000 And who's to say they aren't great now? It's all 1st and 3rd person because it's the "latest" fashion trend in technology, not because they are necessarily better, at least not in an absolute way. I love some 1st person RPGs of today, but I disagree that they're the *only* way to go, and I do still love isometric RPGs.
As for 1st person rts's, well rts's are indeed more suited to isometric view, but that isn't to say that a 1st person rts can't be good!
@KemosabeTBCI I just didn’t find them anywhere near as exhilarating as games like sonic the hedgehog, legend of Zelda and all the other classical console platform games. After playing the games like age of empires I gave the ivrpg’s another chance and saw a better side to it. Maybe I said what I said because I was slightly bitter over how people immediately dismiss the new games just because they don’t like change. Well I don’t like this new youtube layout yet its still here to stay.
@BlankMaster000 The problem is some people dismiss new games because they don't like change, and some people dismiss "old standards" because they're not the latest trend. Very few people *really* look at games for what they are and instead just label them according to some stereotype and dismiss them based on their preconceived notions. I like isometric, 1st person and 3rd person views, I like all types of games. IMO it all dependes on the game and what it tries to accomplish.
@KemosabeTBC You're absolutely correct. People are being trained to think lowly about older games so that when something new comes out 1 year later they'll flock to it and buy it up. (CoD etc.)
@KemosabeTBC Problem with the official fallout 3 is not perspective at all... it just has a shitty storyline, and stuff that made the fallout series the king of rpgs such as melee, action points, unarmed, agility, -- and I could go on for days -- are totally useless in fallout 3. Bethesda's Fallout 3 is just a shooter.
@KemosabeTBC Finally some sense here. You really couldn't imagine how many Morrowind fans attack skyrim since they believe it is too childish. It is the same old arguments you see on this video!
Guys, stop arguing - Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. I've played them, and I've also played Fallout 3 and New Vegas. Both have different gameplay styles other gamers will like. Both are good games.
@byerscm Uhhh what...? Who said they games sucked or Broken Steel didn't make me live longer to complete the side quests? You must have read my comment wrong
@SlaytanicBrad lol Yeah, the Brotherhood of Steel is nothing like the Guardians of the Old Order (power armored xenophobes protecting artifacts from the past - totally different!), the entire plot focusing on a water chip is nothing like the first quest in Highpool, the cultists in the two games are nothing alike, the Red Ryder references have nothing to do with each other (they must be about different Red Ryders), and on and on and on...
I hate bethesda, they suck, they make money not games, Fallout 2 is one of the best games ever made, but the bethesda fallout sucks, they are fun, but nothing like fallout, is like a nice game with fallout stuff, but thats about it, cant wait till they finish with the contract and fallout goes back to interplay.
@byerscm No, Fallout 2 is a much better RPG then Fallout 3.
Oblivion is better at being an open-world sandbox RPG, and Fallout 2 is a better, more difficult RPG in general, Fallout 3 is a bastard child of these two games.
@zulu789456 like I said they are terrible games when you put the fallout name on them but if you are able to forget they are fallout games they are good games outside of the series
@drinkyourtea yeah, i personally like new vegas, is the closest to fallout feeling, but i loved exploring dc on fo3, but nothing can compare to the feeling i get while playing fo2.
Don't get me wrong, They were "fun" at the time but there were too hard even on easy (for me) at that point not many LPs and Walkthroughs were good for my standrads but I can say the story was good just not the gameplay and we all know if you can continue the gameplay you don't get the story
If they had been allowed to finish, Bethesda's first game would have been Fallout 4. I don't see anything in these demos that suggest to me that Van Buren would have reversed Interplay's fortunes in the long term. While I would have liked to have the chance to play it, I'll have to settle for the allusions and re-imaginings in New Vegas and the Honest Hearts expansion.
...alot of Fallout 3 and New Vegas feels haphazard, like it was half-done, anti-climatic and only now are people coming out with mods that fix most of the CTD errors that plagued us as we played. other than I agree and disagree with the traditionalists; Bethesda shouldn't have moved away from the core aspect of the Fallout series (better characters and plot) but taking it to a generation of an RPG FPS shooter was a good step in the right direction.
@legendarytoyou You have VERYvalid points, it's just I don't like it when people fuck over my favorite games. Don't get me wrong as I've stated that I do like the newer Fallout's, but it's just not what I was hoping for. I like to play a game where you feel like your character means something or in simpler terms has purpose...not just a gun toting barbarian with power armor :P
@SlaytanicBrad very true. reason why i play challenge characters lately like my 0 kill challenge on Fallout 3 or my Naked Sniper to add more depth to gameplay. without mods Fallout 3 and New Vegas just seem to lack for some reason as stand alone.
@SlaytanicBrad I can enjoy fallout 3 and new vegas as long as I forget they are fallout games they are good stand alone games but as fallout games they are just terrible terrible games
fallout 1 and 2 had deeper storyline yes but to tell you the truth I found the turn based combat system a little stale. a draw back from the old RPG titles like Final Fantasy pre-10 and other console RPGs which while good the turn based system sometimes made you fall asleep. While not as deep in storyline and characters Fallout 3 and New Vegas added an element of, "staying on your toes" and "watching your back," instead of next turn I can shoot. albeit though Bethesda could've done alot more
Actually. Fallout 1 is a very good game. It is really fun. Fallout 2 is my favorite fallout. Fallout 3 was extremely fun and fallout tactics wasnt fun it was actually boring. Fallout new vegas was a huge adventure for me. and fallout van buren was cool because i had no story it was just a beta. All fallouts are great in there own way. Fallout 1 2 and tactics was for pc gamers. 3 and New vegas was for pc and console gamers. Nv was more traditional compared to fallout 3. i like bethesda alot.
ok guys stop hating on 3 and NV if they werent made then in the future there wouldnt be a improved van burenn coming out called fallout online you get what im trying to say 1 and 2 were great games but face guys theyre not coming back so stop hating and start accepting fallout today
Whenever I hear someone complain about 3 or NV, it's "They're just Oblivion with guns!". While that is true to an extent, I always hear them praise 1 and 2's story and humor. It seems to me that they want something to complain about and don't like the fact that Bethesda has made it into a game that was fun to play and experience the story, (well, the definitively could have had better writers) instead of just the story.
ok i get that the original fans of fallout, the ones that played it since the beginning aren't as big fans of the new ones as the old ones. i havent played the old ones, but i have seen walkthroughs of the fallout 2, and it is a very awesome story but i just dont think the gameplay (like the action and shooting) is what a fun game to play is. fallout 3 and NV has fun gameplay and a cool story and cool weapons and enemies and your options. its just the fallout i prefer.
@TmanAthz123 No it's fun, you just have to have a patience and a taste for it. What you would need for any true RPG anyways. As for "OMG!!!1! OBLIVION WITH GUNS" at Fallout 3, that is pretty much true, but, oblivion was fucking awesome! Making Fallout 3 fun to play. And finally, if you started with the first two Fallout's, Fallout 3's writers probably just read the words "water purification", "corrupt enclave" and "mutants" off of the Fallout 1/2 Wikipedia article, because it seems that wannabe
I dunno what it is with people bashing Fallout 3/NV...they seem butthurt to the fact that the Fallout series is doing something different. I've played Fallout 1/2 (I liked 2 alot better) and i gotta admit that the game has become rather mainstream and most of the nubby console gamers can't even figure out that there were previous games, regardless 3/NV are a shitton of fun
Honestly Ive played all the fallouts and this van buren does not look good, it just looks so dorky (I cant explain how), Im actually glad they changed if that was going to happen instead of Fallout 3.
Oh well, I give up, i guess i can only reload my save until you critically fail at shooting me so that I can have a chance ! Nice chatting with you. Smooth speech skills, my friend.
I dunno what the problem is with fallout 3? It managed to draw me in so well, and i spent untold hours with it. Its the kinda game I will never forget, just because the world they crafted (Not from scratch, but i mean the capital wasteland) was so great. All of the little tidbits you could find, like the man who pleaded for rescue in that one sewer. Does liking and loving fallout 3 make me stupid, immature or "one of them new age gamers"? I don't think so.
@EvilKiwi436 Okay, I'm going to clear up my view of Fallout 3. It was not a "Bad" game but it was a rip off and "wanna be" copy of the previous Fallout's. It was fun though, and I did play it a lot...but I also played the other ones and I see F3 as being a cheap/rushed rip off made for the sole purpose of money and not gamers. They even used the same glitch ridden mechanics as Oblivion. Bethesda should stick with Morrowind or let others make their games.
I respectfully disagree. I played all of the Fallouts preceding FO3, and I liked all of them. But I LOVED Fallout 3 and New Vegas. Just because it went in a different direction by no means makes it a rip-off or a wannabe. I don't see how it "wasn't made for gamers", considering it drew people into Fallout who had never even heard of it before.
I think Bethesda did a fine job, personally. I find Fallout 3 to be a good revival of the series myself. To each his own, I guess.
@SlaytanicBrad yeas, but they fixed almost everything with New Vegas... 3 really sucked, because they created something totally new, except for the enclave (wich, for some reason, is supposed to be destroyed in each video, even tho they are the only able to create new tech and have all the ol' tech). But in New Vegas they polished the engine out with the patches and worked really hard on it to be an actually "spiritual sucessor" to the old fallout games... instead of something 100% new
@SlaytanicBrad Its hardly a rip off seeing as its practically nothing like the originals, I prefer fallout 3, what bethesda did was take a decent game from the past and changed into an image they felt fun to play, which it was. if they wanted to rip it off they would have kept the van buren tech and files that were given to them, kept the same story and released it like that, no, they created something new from scratch, they took it and made it there own, that's the opposite to making a wannabe.
@SlaytanicBrad It's not really a ripoff, Since it has nothing to do with the West Coast, This Fallout 3(Beth one) Is showing what has happend in the East of the US, Plus If Black isle or Interplay would have kept making Fallout it would have turned to FPS and Thirdperson RPG, Better to let someone else (Beth) take the Blame, But Fallout 3 Made me sad like the ending, Is was Sad :3
@MrBoxen When I stated that, Fallout 3 was a "rip off and "wanna be"", I was suggesting that it was both or in other words, a mockery. I do feel better blaming Bethesda though LOL
All these new games are coming out this year (2011), BUT i look foward to none of them, still havent completed Fallout 1 and 2, and hell havent completed Deus Ex, fuck the new Deus Ex
I can understand all the hate on Fallout 3 the only thing going for it really was atmosphere, but why hate on New Vegas. It is worthy of the originals in my eyes from traits and outstanding plot to lots of quests and references to the originals, I really enjoyed it.
I dare to ask everyone: what is wrong what fallout 3 and new vegas? Seriously? I have played fallout 1, 2, 3, and new vegas, and personally i like 3 and nv more than the other 2. You can do more. The map has more details. And whats wrong with the story in the newer ones? Whats wrong with the charcters? I found it all enjoyable. I guarantee there wouldnt be half as much bitching about fallout 3 if it was made by obsidian. Get off your fucking high horses, people.
@cdiegorodriguez I personally haven't played the original 2 Fallouts, and it seems most of the criticism of the new Fallouts is simply elitism. But watching some of the playthroughs of the originals, I do see where they come from when it comes to dialogue and in-depth. One example is the pissed off internet tough guy Enclave soldier at Gecko, who literally splutters with anger at you. There are a rare few interesting voices (Vulpes and Lanius), but most of the newer ones are just monotones.
@cdiegorodriguez Also every NPC in the originals seems to be capable of interesting conversations (though this is admittedly far easier to accomplish when there is no voice acting for the majority of dialogue). I don't know how they compare in terms of being fleshed out, but I was dissatisifed with alot of the aftermath of minor action in Fallout 3. I wiped out Paradise Falls, and everyone was still talking about being taken away by Paradise Falls slavers!
I don't see what so many of the oldies have against New Vegas. I was 12 when Fallout came out. Played through it and loved it, then played through it a dozen or so times again. Same with Fallout 2. Now, I love those 2, and I am what most would characterize as a die-hard fan of them, but I felt that New Vegas was vastly superior to Fallout 3. I felt the story, dialogue and Mojave Wasteland was incredibly engaging. I only realized why when I found out that Obsidian were the remnants of Black Isle.
Those old games where more like stories for me, i always listened to the what the people said, in those new fallout games i just skip the dialoge and go out killing stuff, The story line was better in fallout 1-2. Sure the graphics are better now and killing things is more fun in the newer games. but i'll never forget fallout 1-2, but i will forget fallout 3 and New vegas.
@CrossFeast I loved the originals and think F2 is the best,but why hate on New Vegas?It was epic,story was captivating and original(no mutant/Enclave rip-off like F3)dialouge was interesting,gameplay was better than F3 and it stayed true to the first 2.
@skaterboyask now that i watched it again its not like fallout 1 or 2 grapics dont feel fallout (and im not a care about grapics) bad bad bad game it would be
@skaterboyask did you play fallout brother hood of steel (not tactis) if you did i argee that game sux and where can i get this stupid version of fallout to test
i played fallout1+2 and i have played 3+new vegas. the thing is, i love all of them, but as a shooterfan i love 3+new vegas more. why? -they are shooters -big world -i can take as much time as i want too look for stuff. dont get me wrong fallout 1 and 2 are awesome as hell. but the thing is, time has changed and and a turn-based-fight isn't as awesome as it used to be. fallout 3 was sold 4.700.000 times. new vegas 5.000.000+ times. and what about fallout 1? 144,000+ and fallout 2 123,000+.
@ToppersMovieCorner Yea, that because there are more people like you than like us. Fallout 2 was ALLOT bigger, had more guns, and at least 500+ quests. New Vegas? It's good too, but I just hate the gameplay.
I heard the datas from Van Buren can be used for modifications on Fallout 2 or somethin like that... I am not sure. The Van Buren techdemo looked like the game was having a lot of potential... but now we have a casual FalloutOblivion bastard which call itself Fallout 3... NewVegas is better, but there is no competition to Fallout 1 and 2... and I do not want a Fallout MMORPG, I want a worthy sequel for Fallout 2 with all the backgrounds from Van Buren and the Falloutbibel...
It's pretty sad when you see anonymous gamers make use of marketing speech: "Innovation", "modernization", "competitiveness". You're not the ones making money. No, someone else is, and you're paying them.
Ehhh...... Fo3 and New Vegas is better, I've never liked the whole turn-based thing in 1, 2, and Van Buren. I'm used to First Person. 1 and 2 were pretty cool, though.
@Tugalazix I'm open to new versions of older games, but if you are (or were) a huge fan of any series, and they decide to make a new one, you will be very critical on the new release and have high standards.
To some people, it only takes one bad release to kill the series.
Sometimes, it feels like people have selective memory. Interplay/Black Isle are seen as the heroes of the fallout series where Bethesda is seen as making it more generic. Well, say what you will about Bethesda, but if it wasn't for them, Fallout would be dead. Interplay was running it into the ground, ignoring their own cannon and completely shifting the focus of the series.
SGMZero 5 days ago
@SGMZero You are 100% right. I was playing Skyrim and was curious about Bethesda so, I Googled them to find info. Well I started reading and well long story short, it was Bethesda that saved the franchise. I don't see why people would bash on Bethesda and praise Interplay. I mean sure if it wasn't for Black Isle Studios, the game wouldn't have existed. Like myself I had no idea Fallout existed until Fallout 3 came out. Thank goodness for Bethesda for making Fallout 3 the best one yet.
xxxxdarkknightxxxxx 3 days ago
i read the storyline on nma awhile back, it sounds so much better than either of the new fallouts.
AngryKhan 1 week ago
yey for double ranting also what annoyed me was the super mutants were collecting humans for "the master" when he has been dead for like 200 years and they came from a near by vault so they never met the dam guy
private9942 2 weeks ago
@private9942 Its called geting a new master
MegaSonicKing 2 weeks ago
@MegaSonicKing what there was only one master the vault opened humans got close to the NPV and turned into super muties there is no new master its a non cannon plot hole
private9942 2 weeks ago
@private9942 Then its like that internet group call amynus "Cant spell " .Doesnt have a leader .Because they are all leaders
MegaSonicKing 1 week ago
fallout 3 was ok [this is coming from some one who grew up games like doom fallout 1-2 age of empires etc] BUT the thing i was most disappointed about is that it was so 50's fallout 1-2 have a modern day/futuristic feel but you can tell the old world was 50's fallout 3 only had weapons from the 50s [apart from energy and missile] it should had styers and jack hammers and all that and more Easter eggs and had a better engine to me it just felt like an oblivion mod
private9942 2 weeks ago
@slith333
Maybe because Fallout 3 was made by the same company? Also, how is it not an RPG? It's got all of the RPG elements, quests, inventory, things like that. Personally, I love what Bethesda did with the Fallout franchise, but I would have been happy with Van Buren too. Morrowind and Oblivion were great games too.
BillyMaize1 2 weeks ago
Haven't played new vegas, but fallout 3 was so disappointing... it didn't seem like an rpg. it just seemed like another oblivion/morrowind
Slith333 3 weeks ago
they should remake this as fallout 4
someryguy10 3 weeks ago
So like a post-apocalyptic, single player Runescape? No thank you!
63chicago6 3 weeks ago
@63chicago6 You sir, fail. This is NOTHING like runescape.
TheLuluk01 3 weeks ago
What the name of the song ? it so cool
ProfessorOtacon 3 weeks ago
@ProfessorOtacon Dream a Little Dream of Me
LiberalJerseyman 3 weeks ago
@LiberalJerseyman Thank you
ProfessorOtacon 3 weeks ago
well, at least we got New Vegas.
AsparaIn 4 weeks ago
Is this some kind of joke???
You obviously have no clue how bad Bethesda fucked up Fallout.
But then again you probably don't care about story lines and immersion, go play your MW3, perfect for you A.D.D. Ridden children.
SuperThrivvve 1 month ago
@SuperThrivvve At Least new vegas tried to fix it .
MegaSonicKing 2 weeks ago
Is this some kind of joke? I'm glad it doesn't look like this.
PlatypusOmelette 1 month ago
they should re do fallout 1 and 2 in first person so people will acctually eperience it
GTA5FanMan 1 month ago
imagine fallout 2 with today's graphics EPIC
chris12783 1 month ago
@chris12783 what do graphics have to do with anything? F1 and 2 are still epic... if you are a true gamer and appreciate gameplay over eye candy, that is..
Ohmythatspainful 1 month ago
@Ohmythatspainful dude i love this game what i am asking is fallout 2 remake so fallout 2 fans would be amazed :D
chris12783 1 month ago
Honestly, probably wouldn't be playing fallout 3 if it looked ANYTHING like this. Why anyone ever played video games that were like this beats me. Just my opinion.
klee997 1 month ago
And seriously, anyone who likes this more than any modern game needs to get out of the 90s.
1234yersiman 1 month ago
@1234yersiman i like both yet the 90s games were easier so you shut your gay ass mouth bethesda is a good company but it is being a dick to black isle and inter play look, the fact your a fag , im smarter, the 90 is better oh and can you help me out by not being a dick but i like fallout 3s story better i give you that
newvagasbaby2 1 month ago
@1234yersiman Why? Fuck you.
iamthechanceman 1 month ago
@1234yersiman Fallout tactics was released in 2000's .Making it a morden game.
MegaSonicKing 2 weeks ago
@MegaSonicKing Ever heard of classic style RPGs?
1234yersiman 2 weeks ago
@1234yersiman Yes .But by your reason its a morden game
MegaSonicKing 2 weeks ago
@MegaSonicKing But by its style and gameplay, it is a classic game that really never updated from 1996
1234yersiman 2 weeks ago
@1234yersiman The gameplay is tactics .Fallout 1 and 2 wernt all about tactics .Plus the game dont use the turn based .Its a fast paced fun shooter
MegaSonicKing 1 week ago
@MegaSonicKing Is Fallout tactics worth playing? I have the Fallout1 &2 + tactics game but I've only played F2.I never played tactics because I heard it was more action orientated (not that it's bad).
thewilliamgregg 1 week ago
@thewilliamgregg Yes its more action .Removed the burn based .And you get alot of people to controll
MegaSonicKing 1 week ago
I do nto even see how people could possibly be wanting this more than Bethesda's version. HOnestly, I like their version than these RPGs any day. Just makes role-playing seem more immersive if you ask me.
1234yersiman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fallout 3 would never be the awesome game it is now if it wasn't for bethesda. do some people really prefer this point and click borefest!? rather than the FPS openworld RPG awesomeness it is now today!! i really gave fallout a try. i love long hour strategy games seriously i do. but when i was playing fallout 1 it feels like i was wasting my time. everything dies sooo slowly oh my freakin GOD! THANK YOU BETHESDA! and FUCK YOU VAN BUREN! any prob with that? shove it up your gay fanboy ass!
TheGsharpMajor 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheGsharpMajor 1 month ago
Alot of people perfer click and stare RPG's.
they normally arent creative, they just listen to music their friends do etc etc.
thats not a problem,
but if im going to play a non thinking RPG im just going to go play FALLEN EARTH.
its about 1000 times better then fallout.
the only thing fallout has going for it is the fact bethseda took it out of 1995.
ABOM420 1 month ago
damn BLACK ISLE, ....... THIS FALLOUT 3 IS BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL FALLOUT 3 !!! DAMN BLACK ISLE!!!
gustavo1bilhao 1 month ago
Yeah, Fallout 3 would've been better this way. MUCH better.
Masupups 1 month ago 13
@Masupups Are you sarcastic or serious? i can understand both ways, but i just like first persons better.
MrMyvince 3 weeks ago
@MrMyvince First person is cool, just not for Fallout. It was an innovative attempt, and I admit was kinda neat, but I personally would've preferred if they made it like the others...
Masupups 3 weeks ago
@Masupups You mean stuck in 1996 with only fanboys playing it. Yea pretty much.
1234yersiman 3 days ago
@1234yersiman Opinion, bro. Was more widely appealing genre at the time, whereas first person shooters are more the rage now. I like all sorts of games, but personally, I'd just like it better if they stuck to the isometric and slower pace. Not saying Fallout 3 wasn't good at all, though. Still play it to this day. :)
Masupups 2 days ago
it could have been crap
Falador321 1 month ago
Jesus Christ People. ITS JUST A GAME. Im just sitting back laughing at all of your arguments!
TheDeltaXQ 1 month ago
Its a matter of opinion thats all I have to say about this.
FacePwnch 1 month ago
here is my ranking of the fallout series excluding the brotherhood of steel
1. fallout 2
2. fallout
3. fallout new vegas
4. fallout 3
5. fallout tactics (I refuse to discuss anything about it)
kashmira6 2 months ago
@kashmira6 whats wrong with fallout tactics?
gamerboss007 2 months ago
Trying to win people over with sappy music... Its just ironic trying to pay respects to a game that just looks plain bad. I never did like playing from a birds eye view in rpg games its like playing first person view in an Real time strategy its a FAIL plus the graphics are so horrific and cringe worthy.
BlankMaster000 2 months ago
@BlankMaster000 - Actually birds eye view in RPGS is full of WIN! By the sound of it you probably were just recently born when the greatest RPGs ever made were released: Planescapte Torment and Baldur's Gate II.
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago
@BlankMaster000 And It has nothing to do with nostalgia, it's exactly the opposite, people are just too narrow minded and are not open to creative gaming: YES I HAVE SEEN GOOD REAL TIME STRATEGY IN 1ST PERSON. RPG games in 1st person do look good, but saying that isometric view is not appropriate for RPGs is absurd, it's probably the GENRE THAT SUITS IT THE MOST!
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago
i can only thank god that Fallout 3 did not look as crappy as this.
seriously, isometric view SUCKS BALLS compared to 1st person view.
gmiwoj 2 months ago
@gmiwoj -You must have been born in the last decade... I'm sad that this kind of mentality governs the way games are made today. Isometric view is AWESOME for some genres, and Fallout 1-2 were so much better than Fallout 3. You cannot compare views just like that. Seriously these kids today... I bet they would prefer chess in 1st person view and with explosions everytime you captured a piece.
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago
@KemosabeTBC
well you are wrong, im 26 years old, i played F1 and F2, both twice. i played every good RPG game in history of gaming, and im gonna say it again: isometric view SUCKS BADLY compared to first person view.
fallout is not chess. its an RPG. like in "Role Playing Game", and there is no better way to play role then to see the world with an eyes of your character.
btw: graphics DO matter. a lot.
gmiwoj 2 months ago
@gmiwoj I do agree with the part that graphics matter. I do not agree that "isometric view SUCKS BADLY compared to first person view", it depends on the game. There are RPGs that I *WANT* to be isometric, in fact I would probably refuse to play them if they weren't. Diablo for instance, it just has to be isometric. Fallout looks good in 1st person sure, but I *LOVE* isometric view in RPGs, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago
@KemosabeTBC No... Just no... -.- If I were a good for nothing child I wouldn't even be here or know anything about fallout. Im well aware of all the games and have enjoyed them to some extent. Ok rpg games in a birds eye view were great back in the day but nowadays its all first person and third person. And as for 1st person rts's well anyone who likes them more then isometirc view rts's surely doesn't understand the true concept of real time strategy games...
BlankMaster000 2 months ago
@BlankMaster000 And who's to say they aren't great now? It's all 1st and 3rd person because it's the "latest" fashion trend in technology, not because they are necessarily better, at least not in an absolute way. I love some 1st person RPGs of today, but I disagree that they're the *only* way to go, and I do still love isometric RPGs.
As for 1st person rts's, well rts's are indeed more suited to isometric view, but that isn't to say that a 1st person rts can't be good!
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago
@KemosabeTBCI I just didn’t find them anywhere near as exhilarating as games like sonic the hedgehog, legend of Zelda and all the other classical console platform games. After playing the games like age of empires I gave the ivrpg’s another chance and saw a better side to it. Maybe I said what I said because I was slightly bitter over how people immediately dismiss the new games just because they don’t like change. Well I don’t like this new youtube layout yet its still here to stay.
BlankMaster000 2 months ago
@BlankMaster000 The problem is some people dismiss new games because they don't like change, and some people dismiss "old standards" because they're not the latest trend. Very few people *really* look at games for what they are and instead just label them according to some stereotype and dismiss them based on their preconceived notions. I like isometric, 1st person and 3rd person views, I like all types of games. IMO it all dependes on the game and what it tries to accomplish.
KemosabeTBC 2 months ago 14
@KemosabeTBC You're absolutely correct. People are being trained to think lowly about older games so that when something new comes out 1 year later they'll flock to it and buy it up. (CoD etc.)
SlaytanicBrad 2 months ago
@KemosabeTBC Problem with the official fallout 3 is not perspective at all... it just has a shitty storyline, and stuff that made the fallout series the king of rpgs such as melee, action points, unarmed, agility, -- and I could go on for days -- are totally useless in fallout 3. Bethesda's Fallout 3 is just a shooter.
elchotocorazon 1 month ago
@KemosabeTBC Same as me .I Like all types of games.But all types of games have a sucky one
MegaSonicKing 1 week ago
@KemosabeTBC Finally some sense here. You really couldn't imagine how many Morrowind fans attack skyrim since they believe it is too childish. It is the same old arguments you see on this video!
1234yersiman 3 days ago
Fallout New Vegas sucked compared to fallout 3. Fallout 3 was easily the best out of the series in my opinion (though I have yet to play fallout 2)
garricus1 2 months ago
Guys, stop arguing - Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. I've played them, and I've also played Fallout 3 and New Vegas. Both have different gameplay styles other gamers will like. Both are good games.
VordakAndSpark 3 months ago
@byerscm Also by ending making me sad is that the LW father died and he lived...
MrBoxen 3 months ago
@byerscm Uhhh what...? Who said they games sucked or Broken Steel didn't make me live longer to complete the side quests? You must have read my comment wrong
MrBoxen 3 months ago
well it wasn't so ha ha fallout fps style is way fucking better XD
byerscm 3 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad lol Yeah, the Brotherhood of Steel is nothing like the Guardians of the Old Order (power armored xenophobes protecting artifacts from the past - totally different!), the entire plot focusing on a water chip is nothing like the first quest in Highpool, the cultists in the two games are nothing alike, the Red Ryder references have nothing to do with each other (they must be about different Red Ryders), and on and on and on...
Fallout absolutely ripped off Wasteland.
seothen 3 months ago
love fo1 + 2... but i think you guys are getting a bit nostalgic, and remembering them as something they weren't.
liamjd1 4 months ago
I hate bethesda, they suck, they make money not games, Fallout 2 is one of the best games ever made, but the bethesda fallout sucks, they are fun, but nothing like fallout, is like a nice game with fallout stuff, but thats about it, cant wait till they finish with the contract and fallout goes back to interplay.
zulu789456 4 months ago
@zulu789456 go suck a cock fanboy
byerscm 3 months ago
@byerscm Im a fan of good games, not comercial shit, btw i do like fo3, its just not as good as fo2, now go play cod and stfu!.....
zulu789456 3 months ago
@zulu789456 fallout 3 is much better
byerscm 3 months ago
@byerscm No, Fallout 2 is a much better RPG then Fallout 3.
Oblivion is better at being an open-world sandbox RPG, and Fallout 2 is a better, more difficult RPG in general, Fallout 3 is a bastard child of these two games.
TheHeadlessOne 3 months ago
@zulu789456 like I said they are terrible games when you put the fallout name on them but if you are able to forget they are fallout games they are good games outside of the series
drinkyourtea 3 months ago
@drinkyourtea yeah, i personally like new vegas, is the closest to fallout feeling, but i loved exploring dc on fo3, but nothing can compare to the feeling i get while playing fo2.
zulu789456 3 months ago
I was playing this at school...My teacher was like..."Okay." and walked away lol.
mralan72799 4 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad I love FO3 And FNV what game you should really be calling a ripoff is Fallen Earth
MrBoxen 4 months ago
@MrBoxen um know all 3 games are good bitch
byerscm 3 months ago
Don't get me wrong, They were "fun" at the time but there were too hard even on easy (for me) at that point not many LPs and Walkthroughs were good for my standrads but I can say the story was good just not the gameplay and we all know if you can continue the gameplay you don't get the story
DestroyerJamie 5 months ago
If they had been allowed to finish, Bethesda's first game would have been Fallout 4. I don't see anything in these demos that suggest to me that Van Buren would have reversed Interplay's fortunes in the long term. While I would have liked to have the chance to play it, I'll have to settle for the allusions and re-imaginings in New Vegas and the Honest Hearts expansion.
NutNapalm 5 months ago
Thank god this game never came I hated those point click RPG games Bethesa should never stop making Fallout games
DestroyerJamie 5 months ago
@DestroyerJamie That comment its disgraceful.
JordoF6 5 months ago
@JordoF6 True
SlaytanicBrad 4 months ago
wow this is runescape
chillaxer1993 5 months ago
@chillaxer1993 Haha Runescape only wishes they could be as Epic as Fallout.
I play Runescape btw ^_^
SlaytanicBrad 5 months ago
@chillaxer1993 Can't tell if trolling or just stupid.
aerittithedeiti 5 months ago
ok this is wack but YOUTUBE Fonline is u like fallout
Msme1love 5 months ago
that could be best game ever... could be.
JimPatriotPL 6 months ago
I've been playing New Vegas. It's crap. Every NPC has the same 2-3 lines of dialogue.
GoldthwaiteBlock 6 months ago
@GoldthwaiteBlock
=/ time to leave Goodsprings, maybe?
LastxLive2 6 months ago
...alot of Fallout 3 and New Vegas feels haphazard, like it was half-done, anti-climatic and only now are people coming out with mods that fix most of the CTD errors that plagued us as we played. other than I agree and disagree with the traditionalists; Bethesda shouldn't have moved away from the core aspect of the Fallout series (better characters and plot) but taking it to a generation of an RPG FPS shooter was a good step in the right direction.
legendarytoyou 6 months ago
@legendarytoyou You have VERYvalid points, it's just I don't like it when people fuck over my favorite games. Don't get me wrong as I've stated that I do like the newer Fallout's, but it's just not what I was hoping for. I like to play a game where you feel like your character means something or in simpler terms has purpose...not just a gun toting barbarian with power armor :P
SlaytanicBrad 5 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad very true. reason why i play challenge characters lately like my 0 kill challenge on Fallout 3 or my Naked Sniper to add more depth to gameplay. without mods Fallout 3 and New Vegas just seem to lack for some reason as stand alone.
legendarytoyou 5 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad I can enjoy fallout 3 and new vegas as long as I forget they are fallout games they are good stand alone games but as fallout games they are just terrible terrible games
drinkyourtea 4 months ago
@drinkyourtea You got that right. At least Fallout 3 made you feel like you had a purpose but New Vegas just kind of lacked that for me.
SlaytanicBrad 4 months ago
fallout 1 and 2 had deeper storyline yes but to tell you the truth I found the turn based combat system a little stale. a draw back from the old RPG titles like Final Fantasy pre-10 and other console RPGs which while good the turn based system sometimes made you fall asleep. While not as deep in storyline and characters Fallout 3 and New Vegas added an element of, "staying on your toes" and "watching your back," instead of next turn I can shoot. albeit though Bethesda could've done alot more
legendarytoyou 6 months ago
Its hilarious that this has better graphics than Fallout 3.
WarbossGorgutz 6 months ago
this looks like crap
ktynn 6 months ago
Actually. Fallout 1 is a very good game. It is really fun. Fallout 2 is my favorite fallout. Fallout 3 was extremely fun and fallout tactics wasnt fun it was actually boring. Fallout new vegas was a huge adventure for me. and fallout van buren was cool because i had no story it was just a beta. All fallouts are great in there own way. Fallout 1 2 and tactics was for pc gamers. 3 and New vegas was for pc and console gamers. Nv was more traditional compared to fallout 3. i like bethesda alot.
blackandwhitepro34 6 months ago
ok guys stop hating on 3 and NV if they werent made then in the future there wouldnt be a improved van burenn coming out called fallout online you get what im trying to say 1 and 2 were great games but face guys theyre not coming back so stop hating and start accepting fallout today
4megatiger 6 months ago
Whenever I hear someone complain about 3 or NV, it's "They're just Oblivion with guns!". While that is true to an extent, I always hear them praise 1 and 2's story and humor. It seems to me that they want something to complain about and don't like the fact that Bethesda has made it into a game that was fun to play and experience the story, (well, the definitively could have had better writers) instead of just the story.
Zyilexx 6 months ago
ok i get that the original fans of fallout, the ones that played it since the beginning aren't as big fans of the new ones as the old ones. i havent played the old ones, but i have seen walkthroughs of the fallout 2, and it is a very awesome story but i just dont think the gameplay (like the action and shooting) is what a fun game to play is. fallout 3 and NV has fun gameplay and a cool story and cool weapons and enemies and your options. its just the fallout i prefer.
TmanAthz123 6 months ago
@TmanAthz123 No it's fun, you just have to have a patience and a taste for it. What you would need for any true RPG anyways. As for "OMG!!!1! OBLIVION WITH GUNS" at Fallout 3, that is pretty much true, but, oblivion was fucking awesome! Making Fallout 3 fun to play. And finally, if you started with the first two Fallout's, Fallout 3's writers probably just read the words "water purification", "corrupt enclave" and "mutants" off of the Fallout 1/2 Wikipedia article, because it seems that wannabe
jaymez42 6 months ago
I dunno what it is with people bashing Fallout 3/NV...they seem butthurt to the fact that the Fallout series is doing something different. I've played Fallout 1/2 (I liked 2 alot better) and i gotta admit that the game has become rather mainstream and most of the nubby console gamers can't even figure out that there were previous games, regardless 3/NV are a shitton of fun
THEPANTSWEREDEAD 6 months ago
Honestly Ive played all the fallouts and this van buren does not look good, it just looks so dorky (I cant explain how), Im actually glad they changed if that was going to happen instead of Fallout 3.
VhDVE 7 months ago
(disclamer, i have plaied and beaten all fallouts made)
PEOPLE, WHY ARE FANS OF THE SAME GAME SERIES FIGHTING!
IT MUST TRULY BE THE END OF GAMING!
FUCK, ASIDE OF ALL THE RRRAAGGEE OTHER GAMING TOPICS HAVE, THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE THAT LOVE THE SAME SERIES WHINING SO MUCH ABOUT EACH OTHER!
MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR!
WatchOutBR 7 months ago
@WatchOutBR
But war... War never changes. Even in-between Fallout fans. Ignore them, there's no Karma penalty involved.
NoctaMovies 7 months ago
@NoctaMovies LOOOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOOOLOLOL
Truly my friend
Humm, nice gun you have
*click BOOM*
hahahaa *loots*
WatchOutBR 7 months ago
@WatchOutBR
* Dead but still talking *
God damnit, i knew you had evil karma ! Bury me with my treasures ! No, wait, you're a gravedigger too ?! Raaargh !
NoctaMovies 7 months ago
@NoctaMovies
Whaaaa...
*shoots all limbs and make them go BOOM*
*throw your torso in a lake of irradiated water*
WatchOutBR 7 months ago
@WatchOutBR
Well, mister Bad Guy, you should have patched your game before killing me, because i'll respawn in 6 hours ! :D
NoctaMovies 7 months ago
@NoctaMovies
Well, mercier!
I'll be in my little home with my filling cabinet full of you!
WatchOutBR 7 months ago
@WatchOutBR
Oh well, I give up, i guess i can only reload my save until you critically fail at shooting me so that I can have a chance ! Nice chatting with you. Smooth speech skills, my friend.
NoctaMovies 7 months ago
@NoctaMovies
Nice chatting indeed.
WatchOutBR 7 months ago
I dunno what the problem is with fallout 3? It managed to draw me in so well, and i spent untold hours with it. Its the kinda game I will never forget, just because the world they crafted (Not from scratch, but i mean the capital wasteland) was so great. All of the little tidbits you could find, like the man who pleaded for rescue in that one sewer. Does liking and loving fallout 3 make me stupid, immature or "one of them new age gamers"? I don't think so.
EvilKiwi436 7 months ago 14
@EvilKiwi436 Okay, I'm going to clear up my view of Fallout 3. It was not a "Bad" game but it was a rip off and "wanna be" copy of the previous Fallout's. It was fun though, and I did play it a lot...but I also played the other ones and I see F3 as being a cheap/rushed rip off made for the sole purpose of money and not gamers. They even used the same glitch ridden mechanics as Oblivion. Bethesda should stick with Morrowind or let others make their games.
SlaytanicBrad 7 months ago 3
@SlaytanicBrad
I respectfully disagree. I played all of the Fallouts preceding FO3, and I liked all of them. But I LOVED Fallout 3 and New Vegas. Just because it went in a different direction by no means makes it a rip-off or a wannabe. I don't see how it "wasn't made for gamers", considering it drew people into Fallout who had never even heard of it before.
I think Bethesda did a fine job, personally. I find Fallout 3 to be a good revival of the series myself. To each his own, I guess.
JasonRedfield 7 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad yeas, but they fixed almost everything with New Vegas... 3 really sucked, because they created something totally new, except for the enclave (wich, for some reason, is supposed to be destroyed in each video, even tho they are the only able to create new tech and have all the ol' tech). But in New Vegas they polished the engine out with the patches and worked really hard on it to be an actually "spiritual sucessor" to the old fallout games... instead of something 100% new
DeathScytheBR 7 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad You explained that so well.... Fallout3 = Oblivion - no real RPG elements...
Pavke101 6 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad Its hardly a rip off seeing as its practically nothing like the originals, I prefer fallout 3, what bethesda did was take a decent game from the past and changed into an image they felt fun to play, which it was. if they wanted to rip it off they would have kept the van buren tech and files that were given to them, kept the same story and released it like that, no, they created something new from scratch, they took it and made it there own, that's the opposite to making a wannabe.
thelefthandedfreak 6 months ago
@SlaytanicBrad It's not really a ripoff, Since it has nothing to do with the West Coast, This Fallout 3(Beth one) Is showing what has happend in the East of the US, Plus If Black isle or Interplay would have kept making Fallout it would have turned to FPS and Thirdperson RPG, Better to let someone else (Beth) take the Blame, But Fallout 3 Made me sad like the ending, Is was Sad :3
MrBoxen 4 months ago
@MrBoxen When I stated that, Fallout 3 was a "rip off and "wanna be"", I was suggesting that it was both or in other words, a mockery. I do feel better blaming Bethesda though LOL
SlaytanicBrad 4 months ago
@MrBoxen you can live you moron get broken steel XD
byerscm 3 months ago
@byerscm 4 Comment-Streak!
Counter-Troll Plane inbound! adhiashbdip;ahsbd;cpashdc;phl;h!!
Lyagami25 3 months ago
@EvilKiwi436 Agreed. Fallout 3 will probably go down in video gaming history as a classic. Like morrowind. Well a bit less than morrowind.
Daggerspine107 7 months ago
WHY IS EVERYONE WRITING NOVELS?
sparkybigptalkshow 8 months ago
All these new games are coming out this year (2011), BUT i look foward to none of them, still havent completed Fallout 1 and 2, and hell havent completed Deus Ex, fuck the new Deus Ex
LadyGlaDosofAperture 8 months ago
I can understand all the hate on Fallout 3 the only thing going for it really was atmosphere, but why hate on New Vegas. It is worthy of the originals in my eyes from traits and outstanding plot to lots of quests and references to the originals, I really enjoyed it.
FIRINM4L4Z0RS 8 months ago
WE WANT "THE REAL" FALLOUT 3!!!!!
nothing to complain present FL 3 but.. still.... every old skooler now what i mean!
SuperLumipallo 8 months ago
Am I the only person who liked Fallout 2 AND 3?
ObeseChess 8 months ago
I dare to ask everyone: what is wrong what fallout 3 and new vegas? Seriously? I have played fallout 1, 2, 3, and new vegas, and personally i like 3 and nv more than the other 2. You can do more. The map has more details. And whats wrong with the story in the newer ones? Whats wrong with the charcters? I found it all enjoyable. I guarantee there wouldnt be half as much bitching about fallout 3 if it was made by obsidian. Get off your fucking high horses, people.
cdiegorodriguez 8 months ago
@cdiegorodriguez I personally haven't played the original 2 Fallouts, and it seems most of the criticism of the new Fallouts is simply elitism. But watching some of the playthroughs of the originals, I do see where they come from when it comes to dialogue and in-depth. One example is the pissed off internet tough guy Enclave soldier at Gecko, who literally splutters with anger at you. There are a rare few interesting voices (Vulpes and Lanius), but most of the newer ones are just monotones.
StrangerQuark 8 months ago
@cdiegorodriguez Also every NPC in the originals seems to be capable of interesting conversations (though this is admittedly far easier to accomplish when there is no voice acting for the majority of dialogue). I don't know how they compare in terms of being fleshed out, but I was dissatisifed with alot of the aftermath of minor action in Fallout 3. I wiped out Paradise Falls, and everyone was still talking about being taken away by Paradise Falls slavers!
StrangerQuark 8 months ago
I don't see what so many of the oldies have against New Vegas. I was 12 when Fallout came out. Played through it and loved it, then played through it a dozen or so times again. Same with Fallout 2. Now, I love those 2, and I am what most would characterize as a die-hard fan of them, but I felt that New Vegas was vastly superior to Fallout 3. I felt the story, dialogue and Mojave Wasteland was incredibly engaging. I only realized why when I found out that Obsidian were the remnants of Black Isle.
wuiqed 8 months ago
@wuiqed I dont have anything againist New Vegas.
It really have something good from Fallout 2, i can feel it.
P.S. Third sux
Vadkoubivadko 8 months ago
Stop arguing about which is better, old fallouts or new fallouts, they are both good in their own ways. So keep your opinions to yourselfes.
ANTOmobile55 8 months ago
@Tugalazix I am an "original" fallout franchise fan. To me 3 was horrible. New Vegas though I thought was a prety good play.
IRONBLOODxMECHANIQUE 10 months ago
Those old games where more like stories for me, i always listened to the what the people said, in those new fallout games i just skip the dialoge and go out killing stuff, The story line was better in fallout 1-2. Sure the graphics are better now and killing things is more fun in the newer games. but i'll never forget fallout 1-2, but i will forget fallout 3 and New vegas.
CrossFeast 10 months ago 14
@CrossFeast okay i get it about 3 but why new vegas? its a pretty good game and feels like a fallout game (compared to f3)
akypris 9 months ago
@CrossFeast I loved the originals and think F2 is the best,but why hate on New Vegas?It was epic,story was captivating and original(no mutant/Enclave rip-off like F3)dialouge was interesting,gameplay was better than F3 and it stayed true to the first 2.
TotalNeutrality 7 months ago
just finished fallout 2 again after many years
dont think i would have liked a fallout 3 that would have looked like that
not saying that i liked fallout 3 in the level i enjoyed the other 2 but this one looks really lame
snicp 10 months ago
Too bad they didin't realise the Fallout:3 Van burren full version :(
DJAssassiND 10 months ago
holy fuck this was the worst fallout ever man not even like fallout feeling
skaterboyask 10 months ago
@skaterboyask did you play fallout 1 and 2
MegaSonicKing 10 months ago
@MegaSonicKing yes and this is neither of them its the gay version that they made like more arcade not fallout at all
skaterboyask 10 months ago
@skaterboyask now that i watched it again its not like fallout 1 or 2 grapics dont feel fallout (and im not a care about grapics) bad bad bad game it would be
MegaSonicKing 10 months ago
@MegaSonicKing this game was released that why it was shit i played it it was gay as fuck
skaterboyask 10 months ago
@skaterboyask did you play fallout brother hood of steel (not tactis) if you did i argee that game sux and where can i get this stupid version of fallout to test
MegaSonicKing 10 months ago
@MegaSonicKing uhh buddy this is fallout brotherhood of steel
skaterboyask 10 months ago
@Tugalazix Arent you supposed to be in school young man? Not playing call of duty?
march12314 11 months ago
@Tugalazix HEY GUYS ANOTHER KID ADDICTED ON GRAPHICS!
march12314 11 months ago
@Tugalazix Old gamers? Ilike all games really... What do you have on me huh?
ectofrost 11 months ago
i love fallout 1,2, and 3 but im not a old gamer xD but see very good the game fallout 3 of black isle studios what bad they canceled :(
soap770 11 months ago
thank god for bethesda
D4rkSid31 11 months ago
i played fallout1+2 and i have played 3+new vegas. the thing is, i love all of them, but as a shooterfan i love 3+new vegas more. why? -they are shooters -big world -i can take as much time as i want too look for stuff. dont get me wrong fallout 1 and 2 are awesome as hell. but the thing is, time has changed and and a turn-based-fight isn't as awesome as it used to be. fallout 3 was sold 4.700.000 times. new vegas 5.000.000+ times. and what about fallout 1? 144,000+ and fallout 2 123,000+.
ToppersMovieCorner 11 months ago
@ToppersMovieCorner all the reason
soap770 11 months ago
@ToppersMovieCorner Yea, that because there are more people like you than like us. Fallout 2 was ALLOT bigger, had more guns, and at least 500+ quests. New Vegas? It's good too, but I just hate the gameplay.
rapsis2x2 10 months ago
Damn bethesda their changes
greger2045 11 months ago
I heard the datas from Van Buren can be used for modifications on Fallout 2 or somethin like that... I am not sure. The Van Buren techdemo looked like the game was having a lot of potential... but now we have a casual FalloutOblivion bastard which call itself Fallout 3... NewVegas is better, but there is no competition to Fallout 1 and 2... and I do not want a Fallout MMORPG, I want a worthy sequel for Fallout 2 with all the backgrounds from Van Buren and the Falloutbibel...
HerrFenrisWolf 1 year ago
@Tugalazix i agreee!
busterbate 1 year ago
It's pretty sad when you see anonymous gamers make use of marketing speech: "Innovation", "modernization", "competitiveness". You're not the ones making money. No, someone else is, and you're paying them.
Conistorgis7 1 year ago
Ehhh...... Fo3 and New Vegas is better, I've never liked the whole turn-based thing in 1, 2, and Van Buren. I'm used to First Person. 1 and 2 were pretty cool, though.
Flashuploads 1 year ago
@Tugalazix I'm open to new versions of older games, but if you are (or were) a huge fan of any series, and they decide to make a new one, you will be very critical on the new release and have high standards.
To some people, it only takes one bad release to kill the series.
bashbashing2112 1 year ago
this makes me nostalgic
killthetalibani23 1 year ago