KJC24, please tell Cass that all videos where eyewitnesses state they heard explosions must be removed and the postings declared domestic terrorism with the penalty of indefinite detention. That is the only way your very poor attempt at propaganda will sway anyone's opinion.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
@ryanmacdaddy1000 The outer walls (not columns, they ar at the core and were completely omitted by the 9/11 Commission) pulling inwards only shows that the floor sagged. It being caused by fire isn't proved by this video.
@Mosley2 I don't not believe the people that said they heard explosion-like noises, but that doesn't mean that there were bombs in the buildings either. if there were explosives in those buildings, the sounds would've gone for miles which they didn't. and the outer walls bending, proves that there WEREN'T any explosives in there
@ryanmacdaddy1000 SO you think those people made it up? All those cops, firefighters and surivors? really?
the decible level dictates how fat a sound will travel (as well as what objects are in its way) and those explsoions were reported by media too (but only in the first few days)
again, the outer walls only proves they were pulled INWARDS rather than out (as with the original official story) it does not prove what caused them to do so
@Mosley2 no that's not what I'm saying at all! what I'm saying is if there were explosives in those buildings, EVERYONE would've heard them, not just the cops, firefighters, etc. have you seen a controlled demolition video or been to one in person? the explosions are freaking LOUD. like KJC24 said, they're heard for miles! anyway, I'm through arguing with you. good-bye and Merry Christmas!
As @Mosley2 said, alot of the videos you see were edited for just the sake of some poor schmuck like you trying to debunk the truth. I knew people who died in those buildings, and some who survived. They all told me they heard explosions. Don't you find it odd too that almost all the witnesses who went on record as to hearing explosions in those buildings have all mysteriously died of either unknown causes or suicide? I guess your mom dropped your dumbass on your head too many times!
I have to refute this video. Controlled demolitions use a wide variety of explosives in destroying a building. They can control sound, vibration, where debris falls, ect. Just because u hear huge explosions in these videos doesn't mean that they used the exact same method of demolitions as they did on the WTC buildings. And if you get your facts even more right, you would know there WERE explosions picked up on peoples video and recorders.
@mazjax you didn't answer my question. I hope your cousin wasn't breathing in any toxic dust. Was he a first responder or was he just hanging around till 530
@BNobez Maybe you havent taken a physics class. But "Im too fuxing stupid to understand what happened, so therefore the gubbmint diddit" is NOT physics.
@usindependent50 oh yea? and where are you recycling this bullshit from? Who lied to you? I know you never been near thermite, so what do you even know? Be honest.
Well supermortalhuman most of my information came from controlled demolition experts. Buts its really just a fact. Thermite combusts chaotically without precision. Look up some videos of thermite. It would take a hundred pounds of thermite just to make a dent on the supports. Its not realistic.
@usindependent50 There are over 1500 engineers scientists and other experts on the subject who agree unanimously that the commission is wrong. End of the day, I'm not saying what "actually happened" - I am saying the commission is Not what happened.
Yeah and there are over 100 million engineers and architects all over the world. Congratulations you managed to pull together .001% of the engineers and architects in the world. I have looked at those profiles. Very humorous.
I agree the 9/11 Commission is a weak attempt to tackle the collapse. However it does address the background of the attack. That is not the only story however and if you only get your information from one source that is a big mistake.
Well out of a hundred million only a thousand have officially spoken out and those who have spoken out have not written any reviewed papers. So im guessing there is not alot more that believe the theories. Especially after calling about twenty engineers that I have worked with along with ten architects and twelve controlled demolition expert. The response in unanimous. Feel free to contact them yourselves.
what a dumb video. It just proves 911 was an inside job. For the people who really still are in doubt. Physics does not allow for the the 3 WTC buildings to have fallen the way they did. But there is so much more proof. For instance the PEER REVIEWED article that nano thermite has been found in the dust. This guy that posted this video is hired by his waterboarder buddy Cheney who himself enriched himself due to 911 with many 100's of millions of dollars.
Physics says objects will fall in the direction of gravity.
Steve Jones has not peer-reviewed his paper. However many actual experts have completely disprove his paper. He uses misapplied sciences and makes major contradictions that completely invalidate his points. What he found was merely the byproducts of the collapse.
KJC24 - Apparently, you have not watched tapes of the first live reports at ground level. These were shown on TV on the first day only! But there are dozens of these first day reports on video and many on YouTube. Either that or you are a liar. Is someone paying you for these lies?
@SoFlaPatriot They still trot out their favorite piece of nonsense, the free-fall speed argument, even though the towers fell, on average, in 16 seconds. LOL.
Havent you people ever heard of chemical demolition?! LOL, it's the only other way to bring down buildings in a controlled manner. Its a practice that is 40 years old and guess what? NO Ka-Boom when it goes off... Just shows you how ignorant these "tea bagger-neo-con" types are.... Quote, AVP Requiem " Our Government lie to us!" LOLROFLMFAOWTFBBQORLYANYONEWHODOESENTBELIVE9/11WASANINSIDEJOBISTRULYTRULY"ANAMERICAN"FATPIGASSEATINGMCDONALDS8TIMESAWEEKANDLISTENSTOGLENNBECKASIFHESTHEGOSPEL! LOLLLLLLLL
@BNobez "the towers were completely capable of surviving a plane hit",..think so? yea, maybe if it's a small private plane, but not a 250k lb commercial jet going +/- 500 mph with >10k gallons of fuel on board, one of the biggest problems I saw or DIDN'T see OR HEAR, were the HUNDREDS of explosive charges that would've had to take place, NO FLASHES either...why not?
@shanquilla562 Yeah, exactly. Thermite has been in use for a very long time. The simple grenade canister is over 20 years old. I would think by now, with the government and its Multi-Hundred Billion dollar a year R&D department would be able to come up with something a little more advanced. The amount of thermite needed inside a mixture to cause a reaction is about 73% thermite and he rest can be whatever you need your solution to be, paint, enamel, lacquer whatever.
@shanquilla562 Now coat that a few times over something and youve got a crap load of thermite ready to burst into flames whenever the appropriate reaction happens, IE a fucking plane crashing into a building.
@doucheBagkenny lol...you're Funny, that so Lame, you hillbilly inbred cretin, thermite paint...LMAO and even IF you could, a plane impact would be an irradical way to detonate something like that, and too, it'd HAVE to be exposed to some type of activating charge, not the random impact of an object traveling fast in hopes it'll detonate, you FAIL hillbilly...lol
@shanquilla562 You obviously have no critical thinking skills at all, You have no idea what you are talking about so instead you punt your silly ideas. You make up your own scenario of how you think it might happen because you cant believe how easily it could be done. So you try to make an elaborate situation trying to sway the argument in your favor. But you can't even be a man when you talk, your words are that of a child. You are like Glenn Becks number 1 fan arent you?
@doucheBagkenny So let me get this straight, someone is going to tear out all the drywall, then paint the exact support columns with your magical thermite paint,then re-drywall the whole tower? yea, I get it now, of course, that's what happened,,,LMAO douche-bag kennny has solved the secret conspiracy of 9/11...LMAO
@sarapaylinshanquilla562 Hahahaha, can you see Russia from your backyard? hahaha, I can see you now, "The Gloves are off and the Heels are on" hahaha, what a silly little child mind. You twist w/e you hear into your own self-devised anti-truther logic. I must be right! Our government would not lie to us! You die for honor LOLOLOL what a fence jumper.
@BNobez No, I'm not stupid, I don't know about you, I'd like to know the opinions of companies that do CD's all the time, what they think, I'd almost guarantee you, they wouldn't call it a CD,and "planes exploded before they hit the towers?" huh? what are you looking at?
@shanquilla562 since i cant send you a message due to your Nazi like restrictions of sending you a message or a comment, here ya go! Notice how you can comment my page but not yours, because you are in fact some Fascist dick.
@doucheBagkenny Nazi like restrictions? screw you hillbilly, I don't want some hillbilly cretin like you spamming my channel, now go feed your pigs...lol
@shanquilla562 Hahaha, see my point is proven. What a total pig you are. It's okay to voice your obnoxious opinion but as soon as someone disagrees with you or is correct you try to ignore them. What a child.
@BNobez it's also completely impossible to demolish a building using explosives and have the cameras just a few hundred yards away pick up very loud BOOMS. It's impossible to blow up 267 floors in the same area and not have windows nearby shattered by the shockwaves the explosions would produce. There is no proof that extensive investigations were carried out to see if the WTC would survive a high speed crash and that the fuel load was considered.
@BNobez "WTC was completely capable of surving a plane hit"...what are you NUTS? a 250k lb object with at least 10k gallons of fuel moving at 500 mph? biotch, you're the one that needs a physics refresher..lol the plane impact practically sliced the tower in half, WTF is wrong with you? smoking crack? ...here's something to think about asshole, why haven't ANY CD companies(companies that actively do CD's) come forward with their opinion that 9/11 was a CD?
@KJC24 no i'm NOT saying they were all in on it you fucking dumb turd, an d YES MANY booms WERE heard on 9/11 - i suggest you do some RESEARCH before opening your mouth you fucking idiot - there are PLENTY of videos here on youtube and MANY reports from reports hearing them on the day fucko
@KJC24 I know. I was there, my family was there and my friends, some of who did not survive. Thank you for posting this video. The insane rage and hatred these truther people have for George W. Bush, and their country, promulgated by the media ,has made any contemptible lie believable to them.
@Mosley2 trust me, EVERYONE would've heard the explosions if it was controlled demolition. the "explosions" that the witnesses heard weren't loud enough for it to be controlled demolition
@ryanmacdaddy1000 No, there WERE explosiosn and plenty of people heard them. The fact that you aren't aware of these people shows how little MSM has reported the truth and how little you have you looked into it yourself.
Watch the first 10seconds of this /watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw then search 9/11 Explosions.
This is a single bang just after the WTC collapsed. So why would a bang happen AFTER the building collapsed? Don't you think hundreds of square yards of a collapsed building could produce after-effects that would have a loud sound?
Fact remains, all three towers did not show any loud explosion before or during or even immediately after each tower collapsed.
What you have is a random bang heard at no particular time or place.
Why? So I can be reinforced by how unreliable eye witness testimony is? Since we don't hear any explosions on the audio footage, yet people describe "demolition-like" explosives, we can only conclude that those people are exaggerating.
Those there at the time were scared, confused and the trauma of seeing a 110 story building collapse before your very eyes would only add to the tendancy to over-blow or mis-remember what you saw or heard.
Go watch actual demolitions to see how they sound.
Unlike you, I can put their evidence in context. I have the audio recordings for myself, and can compare it side-by-side to actual demolitions.
Those eye witnesses did not have that luxury.
In actual fact, there were witnesses to the WTC7 collapse who had experience working with controlled demolitions who said it didn't sound like any explosives were used.
I heard a bridge demolition BOOM 2 miles away from my house. And since twoofers like to talk about how far the explosives tossed the WTC steel, I think that such powerful explosives would also reach great distances, let alone a few hundred years to the cameras below.
So how do you know this sound wasn't from one of the many fuel tanks in cars which were documented as exploding as a result of the WTC collapse?
Considering this footage was filmed within minutes of the collapse of WTC towers, it does NOTHING to prove it came from the WTC7 which didn't collapse for another 8 hours.
Why bring up eyewitnesses over and over like a flailing idiot? You do realize we have countless video with the audio included? Can't point me to any booms in the footage? HAHA that's really embarrassing for you.
None of these cameras captured ANY audio of explosives BEFORE or DURING any building collapse.
lol...they didn't catch any total global collapse causing inferno in 7 either....... and actually, Rick Siegle's original 9-11 Eyewitness has ALL the rumbling from explosions from across the river...BEFORE and during the collapses..
so WHAT did BLOW up the FIRST 3 flights of stairs in WTC3 as FDNY reported?
AFTER 2nd impact and BEFORE ANY tower fell
stairs they went up MOMENTS EARLIER
the ONLY way YOU can disprove explosives...is through TESTING....NOT OPINION
HAHA Rick Siegle's video was 2 miles away from the collapse. How can his camera hear "explosives" but cameras 200 yards away hear NOTHING?
Rick Siegles camera was picking up the sound of wind on the microphone or the rumble of trains in the nearby station. Certainly not BOOMS from the WTC as it goes without saying, they would have been heard by those close to the towers as well.
why is it all you can do is contradict, and you think that is sufficient to back your claim...lol
his set-up did capture concussive, deep, blasts...as PROVED by his video...
not if their recording volume is all the way up...all it will do is 'clip' the signal, and create a loud roar, with no discernible parts without processing the audio using a dynamic compressor...I've had a home studio for years, I know a little about audio...
It doesn't matter what the quality is... but for the record, the quality of national news cameras is VERY high quality, and yet they didn't hear anything.
So how come a news camera doesn't hear powerful explosives from 200 yards away, but a cellphone camera can hear explosives from half a mile away?
why is it that YOU can only respond with "What if's..." and "how come..."lol..show me an advertisement for a cell phone that will take streaming videos continuously for hours from '01...
The official story has nothing...no evidence, nothing to back the hypothesis...but bullying and intimidation...
Countless videos have explosions. Countless witnesses say they heard explosions. As for the sound, you hear a giant roar. And guess what? If you search in youtube "1600 firecrackers" you can see that those firecracker give a huge roar as well. Only thing is, to the camera it can't pick up the explosions because there is so many of them. The people can though, because camera audio is not anywhere near equal to ears.
There are no videos with explosive booms in any 9/11 footage of collapses. You need to learn the difference between the sound of a building collapsing and detonation charges.
If you would have watched this video, it should be crystal clear the difference between the two, and how simply LOUD explosives are... which are not heard on 9/11.
You make a poor effort to say that the cameras didn't hear them because... there were too many explosives? What an idiot.
"Roar"? LOL, your ignorance as to how explosives work and sound is just ridiculous.
I know firsthand how LOUD explosives are. A bridge nearly 2 miles from my home was demolished and it was deafening from even 2 miles. Cameras more than a mile away from the WTC captures virtually no audio.
WTC collapsed QUIETLY. This is why the surrounding windows were still intact, and why reporters with their back to the WTC7 didn't even know it was collapsing.
Fuck you. How loud? Hmm...an explosion that was recorded before the collapse was loud enough to be heard from across the water from the Twin Towers. I think that's pretty damn loud.
The History Channel had some of the best footage I have seen, but, when they ran 9-11 specials, the don't show video after 5 min. before collapse, during the collapse they show fast clips and stills, with music playing...NO original audio
their equipment is much better, they record a separate audio track so it can be processed easily later...why did they play NO actual audio when the reported explosions were occurring
BTW idiot, if YOU want to debunk explosives, then concentrate on the 1st 3 flights of stairs that FDNY reported BLOWING UP, BEFORE any tower fell..
this IS an eye witnessed event...with NO logical basis for it even occurring...and all YOU an do is IGNORE IT....'cause you have too...right...you have NO f*cking answer
Why is it that NIST will base their WTC3 HYPOTHESIS...ENTIRELY... on hearsay of a couple people, but the IGNORE , the HUNDREDS of witnesses who report large concussive explosions
None of these cameras captures ANY audio of explosives BEFORE or DURING any building collapse.
There are videos where you hear booms and rumblings before the collapses. And those videos have been around for 8 years and have stood their ground pretty well against the debunkers.
Out of the dozens of videos I've seen of the collapse of all three of the towers, NONE of them feature sounds consistent with demolition explosives.
Considering regular demolition materials are heard for MILES as I can personally verify, and these weren't even the type of explosives that can "pulverize concrete" or "thrown tons of steel hundreds of feet".
PAPD Police Officer Middleton- "periodically, you would hear a loud boom go off at the top of tower one. After approximately 15 minutes suddenly there was another loud boom at the upper floors, then there was a series of smaller explosions which appeared to go completely around the building at the upper floors. And another loud earth shattering blast with a large fire ball which blew out more debris"
(1) Angel Rivera FDNY explosions in the Marriott Hotel before either tower fell "when we hit the 19th floor, something horrendous happened. It was like a bomb went off. We thought we were dead. The whole building shook. The brick coming out of -- the door to the hallway into the hotel blew off like somebody had thrown it. It shook all over the place. We were thrown on the floor. We looked inside the lobby after everything calmed down, and everything was collapsed."
The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building.
If you had full start to finish video of each building then I would buy your logic. You do not have enough video to prove noise. nice try. I do not believe like the people running around screaming 9-11 was an inside job.{ I do however wonder where the Pentagon Video is? Why Building 7 is not in the 9-11 report? Why Bin Laden has never been charged? An American with questions does that scare you?
Incase you didn't notice I got 1+2 from start to finish. I couldn't easily find 7 from start to finish, but that's because clips on youtube only featured it as it began to fall. You can bet if explosions were heard, the clips would have included them.
7 wasn't in the comission because it wasn't an engineering report. NIST covered that.
Bin Laden was never charged because he was never caught. You ain't got questions, you are just a standard twoofer moron.
NIST and the entire civil engineering scientific community agreed that there was no demolition which makes your original claim that the commission didn't look at the 7 tower moot. Nobody was killed in the WTC7 building and it wasn't directly attacked.
After 9/11 a bounty of $50 million is on the head of bin laden. FBI wants him bad
What makes you think any cameras around the pentagon had a shot? Ignoring all the witnesses, we see 1 frame of something the shape, size and color of an AA jet.
"FBI STILL has 18 un-released videos that they confiscated showing the impact from different views "
False.
Also, since if the collapse starts naturally, then HOW it collapsed WAS natural--and not a CD. Dont have to account for exactly how every rivet behaved to know it wasnt a CD.
no.....a natural structural collapse starts from a SINGULAR point, known structural failure,
laws of mechanics, conservation of energy, transference of energy, Newtons 2nd, 3rd. law... WE SEE, there is NOT consistent heat source to evenly affect the towers, for the ***unexplained release*** into the impact floor
it's ONLY being called 'natural' to serve an agenda..there is NOTHING natural about it
LOL, try actually CHECKING the source for that. Its not 85 tapes of the pentagon. Its 85 tapes TOTAL. From all over the eastern seabaord--where ever they thought something caught a pic of the terrorists.
Google isnt your friend. FACTS can be found there. Facts are your enemy. As America is. =]
the fantasy movie called "Loose Change"? Loose Change never said that buildings are built to collapse into themselves like Building 7 and the Twin Towers. You must be thinking of the NIST report. But hey, that's not a movie!
I'm sure you know every little detail of my life, so you know I watched Loose Change and that convinced me. As well, you know what I ate for dinner last night.
Ok, I get it Achmed. Youre lying to the great satan to help your brothers in the religeon of "peace" ::giggle" get away with murdering 3000 great Americans.
You are a fucking racist, like all debunkers. Proves how retarded you guys are. Please, if you have nothing to prove, don't talk to me. I really don't have time for scum.
I'm not talking about Islam, you bone-head. "Ahmed" is an Arab name, indicating that you are a racist who hates Arabs (though I'm not an Arab). You better tell that to PoetryHound though because he considers anti-semites bigots and racists.
seems to me that the SAME sound was heard on 9-11, EXCEPT, it is labeled as "the floors hitting each other....ANOTHER USELESS video made by a typical SHILLY idiot to ease his OWN conscience...or to spread LIES
blite13 , all that proves is that you're an moron. Lots of things can expload in a building fire. In the Windsor tower in Madrid they reported explosions but that doesnt mean the Windsor tower was demolished. Sounds of explosions are expected in large building fires. Demolitions are timed and sequential, they dont go off randomly all over the place which is what truthers' witness talk about, either that or they are out of context and didnt mean what the truthers claim they meant.
No you dont get that on 911, we get a gradual progressive rumble. The truther leaders like David Chandler suggest they even put more explosives in the towers for the sole purpose of flinging steel around. How about WTC7 where cameras only a couple of blocks away picked up zero booms at all. Steel makes loud sounds when it breaks we can expect it to make a sound, just not demolition sounds.
blite13, if you take his word why dont you take the word of all the firefighters about WTC7.? NONE reported explosions. NONE reported it was strange that it collapsed. They all believed it would collase on its own. They heard it bulging, leaning, creaking and things were crackling and falling. They were literally waiting around for it to collapse so they could go in and look for their brothers. There is no dissenting opinion from ANY OF THEM. Why you are picking one guy out of everyone else?
Ive already replied to that on another video comment. You have to ignore all firefighters and emergency services who heard absolutely demolition sounds and who had no problem with its collapse. Who were literally waiting around for it to collapse. The firefighters report it bulging, leaning, creaking, groaning and things were crackling and falling. Why do you hate the firefighters so much?
There is a problem with comparison. How many conventional demolitions begin 80 storeys high? Does vertical displacement affect sound recording? There are most definitely explosive reports. Are they, as has been suggested, floors colliding, or are they demolition explosives? Are eyewitness accounts, including survivors from inside the towers who report explosive detonations to be discarded out of hand? Why?
Once again we are relying on witness accounts when we can hear for ourselves.
So because the "demolition" starts slightly higher up from the ground than normal demolitions it's all of a sudden going to be silent to the many microphones that recorded the collapse?
Also amazing how the "explosives" survived the plane and fires to be detonated more than an hour later seemingly unharmed by the extreme conditions. It's just extremely stupid.
KJC24, its not about ignoring eye witness its about putting them back in context. For the truth movement dont care when they said it or if they realised later what it was, if they said explosions that automatically equals explosives to them screw the context.
Skeptickler, sounds of explosions dont equal sounds of explosives. If you put the eye witness's back context they could not possibly be refering to explosives or they didnt mean what the truthers claim they meant since truthers dont care about context. Demolitions are timed and sequential they dont go off all over the place. High explosives exhibit certain properties that you dont see on 911. Explosions sounds are expected in large building fires. Even steel makes loud bangs when it breaks.
Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together. One example is a gel made of an oxidizer with a fuel embedded in the pores of the gel. In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. "These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius," says Simpson.
Such thermites have traditionally been produced by mixing fine powders of metal oxides and metal fuels. "Conventionally, mixing these fine powders can result in an extreme fire hazard. Sol-gel methods can reduce that hazard while dispersing extremely small particles in a uniform way not possible through normal processing methods,"
When I type in "nanothermite" I get nothing but truther videos. Which tells me that in reality, this substance either doesn't exist or there is nothing known about it allowing truthers to just make up their own bullshit for it.
For instance, nobody has any footage of nanothermite in action, so how can anybody say it was used to bring a tower down?
KJC24, please tell Cass that all videos where eyewitnesses state they heard explosions must be removed and the postings declared domestic terrorism with the penalty of indefinite detention. That is the only way your very poor attempt at propaganda will sway anyone's opinion.
BUGBOY10000 3 weeks ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
ctcole77 2 weeks ago
conspiracy theorists, look at 4:56. do you not see the outer columns bending inward? that proves 9/11 was NOT an inside job
ryanmacdaddy1000 2 months ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 The outer walls (not columns, they ar at the core and were completely omitted by the 9/11 Commission) pulling inwards only shows that the floor sagged. It being caused by fire isn't proved by this video.
Mosley2 2 months ago
@Mosley2 I don't not believe the people that said they heard explosion-like noises, but that doesn't mean that there were bombs in the buildings either. if there were explosives in those buildings, the sounds would've gone for miles which they didn't. and the outer walls bending, proves that there WEREN'T any explosives in there
ryanmacdaddy1000 2 months ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 SO you think those people made it up? All those cops, firefighters and surivors? really?
the decible level dictates how fat a sound will travel (as well as what objects are in its way) and those explsoions were reported by media too (but only in the first few days)
again, the outer walls only proves they were pulled INWARDS rather than out (as with the original official story) it does not prove what caused them to do so
Mosley2 2 months ago
@Mosley2 no that's not what I'm saying at all! what I'm saying is if there were explosives in those buildings, EVERYONE would've heard them, not just the cops, firefighters, etc. have you seen a controlled demolition video or been to one in person? the explosions are freaking LOUD. like KJC24 said, they're heard for miles! anyway, I'm through arguing with you. good-bye and Merry Christmas!
ryanmacdaddy1000 2 months ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 I'm saying everyone DID hear the, it's only the cops etc... that are on record though for you to check.
High loud a demolition is depends on the type of explosive used, and again for how long they are heard depends on other factors.
Arguing? I thought this was a polite discussion.
Mosley2 2 months ago
KJC24 ur great!
LuisJimenez92 2 months ago
As @Mosley2 said, alot of the videos you see were edited for just the sake of some poor schmuck like you trying to debunk the truth. I knew people who died in those buildings, and some who survived. They all told me they heard explosions. Don't you find it odd too that almost all the witnesses who went on record as to hearing explosions in those buildings have all mysteriously died of either unknown causes or suicide? I guess your mom dropped your dumbass on your head too many times!
IMPAQT 4 months ago
Comment removed
IMPAQT 4 months ago
I have to refute this video. Controlled demolitions use a wide variety of explosives in destroying a building. They can control sound, vibration, where debris falls, ect. Just because u hear huge explosions in these videos doesn't mean that they used the exact same method of demolitions as they did on the WTC buildings. And if you get your facts even more right, you would know there WERE explosions picked up on peoples video and recorders.
IMPAQT 4 months ago
@mazjax you didn't answer my question. I hope your cousin wasn't breathing in any toxic dust. Was he a first responder or was he just hanging around till 530
Frostyundercarriage 5 months ago
Most clips(of bld 7) are edited silent. Plus they scrubbed the penthouse from some video. Why?
Frostyundercarriage 8 months ago
@Frostyundercarriage My cousin saw WTC7 fall down, and there weren't any loud booms, sorry.
MazJax 5 months ago
@BNobez Maybe you havent taken a physics class. But "Im too fuxing stupid to understand what happened, so therefore the gubbmint diddit" is NOT physics.
EdgemanLL2 8 months ago
Pretty sure thermite doesn't go Boom.
supermortalhuman 11 months ago
@supermortalhuman
Thermite does not have enough direct energy to make a straight cut through the thick core structures.
usindependent50 10 months ago
@usindependent50 oh yea? and where are you recycling this bullshit from? Who lied to you? I know you never been near thermite, so what do you even know? Be honest.
supermortalhuman 10 months ago
@supermortalhuman
Well supermortalhuman most of my information came from controlled demolition experts. Buts its really just a fact. Thermite combusts chaotically without precision. Look up some videos of thermite. It would take a hundred pounds of thermite just to make a dent on the supports. Its not realistic.
usindependent50 10 months ago
@usindependent50 There are over 1500 engineers scientists and other experts on the subject who agree unanimously that the commission is wrong. End of the day, I'm not saying what "actually happened" - I am saying the commission is Not what happened.
supermortalhuman 10 months ago
@supermortalhuman
Yeah and there are over 100 million engineers and architects all over the world. Congratulations you managed to pull together .001% of the engineers and architects in the world. I have looked at those profiles. Very humorous.
I agree the 9/11 Commission is a weak attempt to tackle the collapse. However it does address the background of the attack. That is not the only story however and if you only get your information from one source that is a big mistake.
usindependent50 10 months ago
@usindependent50 but how many of all those you mention are speaking out and saying no it is true?
supermortalhuman 10 months ago
@supermortalhuman
Well out of a hundred million only a thousand have officially spoken out and those who have spoken out have not written any reviewed papers. So im guessing there is not alot more that believe the theories. Especially after calling about twenty engineers that I have worked with along with ten architects and twelve controlled demolition expert. The response in unanimous. Feel free to contact them yourselves.
usindependent50 10 months ago
@usindependent50 i wont even say this is how it happened - i will say the commission is not how it happened. should be called the omission.
supermortalhuman 10 months ago
@supermortalhuman
No one says you should just believe one source!
I realize the 911 Commission did a good job in some areas and a weak job in others. Just like every source. Thats why you have to have many sources.
The furthest this conspiracy could go is that Bush knew about the attacks. Anymore is simply unrealistic.
usindependent50 10 months ago
what a dumb video. It just proves 911 was an inside job. For the people who really still are in doubt. Physics does not allow for the the 3 WTC buildings to have fallen the way they did. But there is so much more proof. For instance the PEER REVIEWED article that nano thermite has been found in the dust. This guy that posted this video is hired by his waterboarder buddy Cheney who himself enriched himself due to 911 with many 100's of millions of dollars.
edicccc 1 year ago
@edicccc
Physics says objects will fall in the direction of gravity.
Steve Jones has not peer-reviewed his paper. However many actual experts have completely disprove his paper. He uses misapplied sciences and makes major contradictions that completely invalidate his points. What he found was merely the byproducts of the collapse.
usindependent50 10 months ago
KJC24 - Apparently, you have not watched tapes of the first live reports at ground level. These were shown on TV on the first day only! But there are dozens of these first day reports on video and many on YouTube. Either that or you are a liar. Is someone paying you for these lies?
JohnnyFaroe 1 year ago
BULLSHIT!
9/11 was an Inside Job!
bofors7715 1 year ago
@BNobez yeah well I've taken plenty of physics and I'm here to tell you you're an idiot
SoFlaPatriot 1 year ago
Excellent video. I hope some of the twoofers lost some sleep over this when they realized how dumb they are. The big mystery here for some:gravity
SoFlaPatriot 1 year ago
@SoFlaPatriot They still trot out their favorite piece of nonsense, the free-fall speed argument, even though the towers fell, on average, in 16 seconds. LOL.
759009946576 1 year ago
@SoFlaPatriot What a retarted comment...if you are not paid to comment then you have no brain
marinaauto 1 year ago
@marinaauto there are still a few days left to ask Santa for a brain. Better hurry up and write that letter. Moron.
SoFlaPatriot 1 year ago
Havent you people ever heard of chemical demolition?! LOL, it's the only other way to bring down buildings in a controlled manner. Its a practice that is 40 years old and guess what? NO Ka-Boom when it goes off... Just shows you how ignorant these "tea bagger-neo-con" types are.... Quote, AVP Requiem " Our Government lie to us!" LOLROFLMFAOWTFBBQORLYANYONEWHODOESENTBELIVE9/11WASANINSIDEJOBISTRULYTRULY"ANAMERICAN"FATPIGASSEATINGMCDONALDS8TIMESAWEEKANDLISTENSTOGLENNBECKASIFHESTHEGOSPEL! LOLLLLLLLL
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@BNobez "the towers were completely capable of surviving a plane hit",..think so? yea, maybe if it's a small private plane, but not a 250k lb commercial jet going +/- 500 mph with >10k gallons of fuel on board, one of the biggest problems I saw or DIDN'T see OR HEAR, were the HUNDREDS of explosive charges that would've had to take place, NO FLASHES either...why not?
shanquilla562 1 year ago
@shanquilla562 Yeah, exactly. Thermite has been in use for a very long time. The simple grenade canister is over 20 years old. I would think by now, with the government and its Multi-Hundred Billion dollar a year R&D department would be able to come up with something a little more advanced. The amount of thermite needed inside a mixture to cause a reaction is about 73% thermite and he rest can be whatever you need your solution to be, paint, enamel, lacquer whatever.
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@shanquilla562 Now coat that a few times over something and youve got a crap load of thermite ready to burst into flames whenever the appropriate reaction happens, IE a fucking plane crashing into a building.
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@doucheBagkenny lol...you're Funny, that so Lame, you hillbilly inbred cretin, thermite paint...LMAO and even IF you could, a plane impact would be an irradical way to detonate something like that, and too, it'd HAVE to be exposed to some type of activating charge, not the random impact of an object traveling fast in hopes it'll detonate, you FAIL hillbilly...lol
shanquilla562 1 year ago
@shanquilla562 You obviously have no critical thinking skills at all, You have no idea what you are talking about so instead you punt your silly ideas. You make up your own scenario of how you think it might happen because you cant believe how easily it could be done. So you try to make an elaborate situation trying to sway the argument in your favor. But you can't even be a man when you talk, your words are that of a child. You are like Glenn Becks number 1 fan arent you?
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@doucheBagkenny So let me get this straight, someone is going to tear out all the drywall, then paint the exact support columns with your magical thermite paint,then re-drywall the whole tower? yea, I get it now, of course, that's what happened,,,LMAO douche-bag kennny has solved the secret conspiracy of 9/11...LMAO
shanquilla562 1 year ago
@sarapaylinshanquilla562 Hahahaha, can you see Russia from your backyard? hahaha, I can see you now, "The Gloves are off and the Heels are on" hahaha, what a silly little child mind. You twist w/e you hear into your own self-devised anti-truther logic. I must be right! Our government would not lie to us! You die for honor LOLOLOL what a fence jumper.
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@BNobez No, I'm not stupid, I don't know about you, I'd like to know the opinions of companies that do CD's all the time, what they think, I'd almost guarantee you, they wouldn't call it a CD,and "planes exploded before they hit the towers?" huh? what are you looking at?
shanquilla562 1 year ago
@shanquilla562 since i cant send you a message due to your Nazi like restrictions of sending you a message or a comment, here ya go! Notice how you can comment my page but not yours, because you are in fact some Fascist dick.
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@doucheBagkenny Nazi like restrictions? screw you hillbilly, I don't want some hillbilly cretin like you spamming my channel, now go feed your pigs...lol
shanquilla562 1 year ago
@shanquilla562 Hahaha, see my point is proven. What a total pig you are. It's okay to voice your obnoxious opinion but as soon as someone disagrees with you or is correct you try to ignore them. What a child.
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@BNobez it's also completely impossible to demolish a building using explosives and have the cameras just a few hundred yards away pick up very loud BOOMS. It's impossible to blow up 267 floors in the same area and not have windows nearby shattered by the shockwaves the explosions would produce. There is no proof that extensive investigations were carried out to see if the WTC would survive a high speed crash and that the fuel load was considered.
KJC24 1 year ago
@BNobez "WTC was completely capable of surving a plane hit"...what are you NUTS? a 250k lb object with at least 10k gallons of fuel moving at 500 mph? biotch, you're the one that needs a physics refresher..lol the plane impact practically sliced the tower in half, WTF is wrong with you? smoking crack? ...here's something to think about asshole, why haven't ANY CD companies(companies that actively do CD's) come forward with their opinion that 9/11 was a CD?
shanquilla562 1 year ago
so you'rer saying INORE EVERYTHING THAT WAS HEARD INSIDE THE TOWERS?
you're a joke
video caught shows otherwise, injured people say otherwise, you can't just ignore them
and no, no BOOM doesn't mean no explosives, and for the record many BOOMS were recorded they just dont show them on tv
Mosley2 2 years ago
@Mosley2 Why wouldn't they show them on TV? Are you saying that all of the news organizations and journalists and amateur cameramen were IN ON IT?
BOOMS are heard for miles, dickhead. There were no BOOMS on 9/11
KJC24 1 year ago 2
@KJC24 no i'm NOT saying they were all in on it you fucking dumb turd, an d YES MANY booms WERE heard on 9/11 - i suggest you do some RESEARCH before opening your mouth you fucking idiot - there are PLENTY of videos here on youtube and MANY reports from reports hearing them on the day fucko
Mosley2 1 year ago
@KJC24 I know. I was there, my family was there and my friends, some of who did not survive. Thank you for posting this video. The insane rage and hatred these truther people have for George W. Bush, and their country, promulgated by the media ,has made any contemptible lie believable to them.
GiovannaNYC 1 year ago
@Mosley2 trust me, EVERYONE would've heard the explosions if it was controlled demolition. the "explosions" that the witnesses heard weren't loud enough for it to be controlled demolition
ryanmacdaddy1000 2 months ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 No, there WERE explosiosn and plenty of people heard them. The fact that you aren't aware of these people shows how little MSM has reported the truth and how little you have you looked into it yourself.
Watch the first 10seconds of this /watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw then search 9/11 Explosions.
Mosley2 2 months ago
watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM
Boom, you just got debunked KJC24
euro944t 2 years ago
You act like I haven't seen this before.
This is a single bang just after the WTC collapsed. So why would a bang happen AFTER the building collapsed? Don't you think hundreds of square yards of a collapsed building could produce after-effects that would have a loud sound?
Fact remains, all three towers did not show any loud explosion before or during or even immediately after each tower collapsed.
What you have is a random bang heard at no particular time or place.
KJC24 2 years ago
Wrong. Watch 9/11 Eyewitness. And by the way, RDX can be heard from 1 mile away, not 2 miles.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Why? So I can be reinforced by how unreliable eye witness testimony is? Since we don't hear any explosions on the audio footage, yet people describe "demolition-like" explosives, we can only conclude that those people are exaggerating.
Those there at the time were scared, confused and the trauma of seeing a 110 story building collapse before your very eyes would only add to the tendancy to over-blow or mis-remember what you saw or heard.
Go watch actual demolitions to see how they sound.
KJC24 2 years ago
Unreliable? What the hell is their motive stupid?
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
I did not for one second suggest they lied.
Unlike you, I can put their evidence in context. I have the audio recordings for myself, and can compare it side-by-side to actual demolitions.
Those eye witnesses did not have that luxury.
In actual fact, there were witnesses to the WTC7 collapse who had experience working with controlled demolitions who said it didn't sound like any explosives were used.
Read Brent Blanchard's article.
KJC24 2 years ago
1 mile? Under what conditions?
I heard a bridge demolition BOOM 2 miles away from my house. And since twoofers like to talk about how far the explosives tossed the WTC steel, I think that such powerful explosives would also reach great distances, let alone a few hundred years to the cameras below.
KJC24 2 years ago
Sound travels. THAT'S WHY!
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Wrong KJ24,
This was WTC7 sound you lazy debunker , the one the media won't show, Faux News too busy looping the +3000 human snuff film for Elite Luciferians.
euro944t 2 years ago
So how do you know this sound wasn't from one of the many fuel tanks in cars which were documented as exploding as a result of the WTC collapse?
Considering this footage was filmed within minutes of the collapse of WTC towers, it does NOTHING to prove it came from the WTC7 which didn't collapse for another 8 hours.
KJC24 2 years ago
The collapse @ 3:37 is amazing..right in the middle of all those buildings!
fernfeyes 2 years ago
Barry Jennings was in WTC7 on the morning of 9/11 and puts his account on the record.
He was trapped in WTC 7, from explosions that destroyed the lobby and the 6th floor, with another person "before" either tower fell
watch?v=VQY-ksiuwKU
watch?v=kxUj6UgPODo
hgfbob 2 years ago
Why bring up eyewitnesses over and over like a flailing idiot? You do realize we have countless video with the audio included? Can't point me to any booms in the footage? HAHA that's really embarrassing for you.
None of these cameras captured ANY audio of explosives BEFORE or DURING any building collapse.
KJC24 2 years ago
lol...they didn't catch any total global collapse causing inferno in 7 either....... and actually, Rick Siegle's original 9-11 Eyewitness has ALL the rumbling from explosions from across the river...BEFORE and during the collapses..
so WHAT did BLOW up the FIRST 3 flights of stairs in WTC3 as FDNY reported?
AFTER 2nd impact and BEFORE ANY tower fell
stairs they went up MOMENTS EARLIER
the ONLY way YOU can disprove explosives...is through TESTING....NOT OPINION
where are the testing results?
hgfbob 2 years ago
HAHA Rick Siegle's video was 2 miles away from the collapse. How can his camera hear "explosives" but cameras 200 yards away hear NOTHING?
Rick Siegles camera was picking up the sound of wind on the microphone or the rumble of trains in the nearby station. Certainly not BOOMS from the WTC as it goes without saying, they would have been heard by those close to the towers as well.
KJC24 2 years ago
why is it all you can do is contradict, and you think that is sufficient to back your claim...lol
his set-up did capture concussive, deep, blasts...as PROVED by his video...
not if their recording volume is all the way up...all it will do is 'clip' the signal, and create a loud roar, with no discernible parts without processing the audio using a dynamic compressor...I've had a home studio for years, I know a little about audio...
hgfbob 2 years ago
You know nothing about audio. Nothing whatsoever.
It doesn't matter what the quality is... but for the record, the quality of national news cameras is VERY high quality, and yet they didn't hear anything.
So how come a news camera doesn't hear powerful explosives from 200 yards away, but a cellphone camera can hear explosives from half a mile away?
KJC24 2 years ago
ummm...WHAT cell phone camera?
why is it that YOU can only respond with "What if's..." and "how come..."lol..show me an advertisement for a cell phone that will take streaming videos continuously for hours from '01...
The official story has nothing...no evidence, nothing to back the hypothesis...but bullying and intimidation...
oh....NOT from YOU.....the Gov.
your a shilly putz
hgfbob 2 years ago
Countless videos have explosions. Countless witnesses say they heard explosions. As for the sound, you hear a giant roar. And guess what? If you search in youtube "1600 firecrackers" you can see that those firecracker give a huge roar as well. Only thing is, to the camera it can't pick up the explosions because there is so many of them. The people can though, because camera audio is not anywhere near equal to ears.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
There are no videos with explosive booms in any 9/11 footage of collapses. You need to learn the difference between the sound of a building collapsing and detonation charges.
If you would have watched this video, it should be crystal clear the difference between the two, and how simply LOUD explosives are... which are not heard on 9/11.
You make a poor effort to say that the cameras didn't hear them because... there were too many explosives? What an idiot.
KJC24 2 years ago
The camera DID hear them. That was the roar. I guess firecrackers are hushabooms because you hear a roar there too. Firefighters: "Like detonators".
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
"Roar"? LOL, your ignorance as to how explosives work and sound is just ridiculous.
I know firsthand how LOUD explosives are. A bridge nearly 2 miles from my home was demolished and it was deafening from even 2 miles. Cameras more than a mile away from the WTC captures virtually no audio.
WTC collapsed QUIETLY. This is why the surrounding windows were still intact, and why reporters with their back to the WTC7 didn't even know it was collapsing.
Dickhead.
KJC24 2 years ago
Fuck you. How loud? Hmm...an explosion that was recorded before the collapse was loud enough to be heard from across the water from the Twin Towers. I think that's pretty damn loud.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
The fact that you can make a statement like this without being embarrassed just shows how delusional you are.
If it is so loud that it can be heard 2 miles away, don't you think it would be heard 200 YARDS FROM THE TWIN TOWERS?
Dozens of cameras were filming close to the towers and no explosives were heard in the audio before, during or after the collapse.
KJC24 2 years ago
Idiot, if you were 2 miles away you wouldn't know it was a bridge. Debunkers are the twoofers with a capital T. Worse than David Icke!
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Well be prepared to feel very stupid indeed.
How did I know it was a bridge? Because it got massive coverage on the local news who broadcast it on live TV.
You set em up and I'll knock em down, twoof!
KJC24 2 years ago
great. Show me the videos of the towers that look and sound like these. Then Im all with you kooks.
watch?v=eRZPPdf_sm0&feature=related
watch?v=eUIdf4UJ3_4&feature=related
watch?v=ZlGmnKvOhlg&feature=related
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
Asshole, the Twin Tower were rapidly being blown up.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
@thehipsterofnewyork
Then you should have NO PROBLEM showing me the videos I asked for, Asshole.
LOLOLOL. Yet you cant? Lie much?
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
The History Channel had some of the best footage I have seen, but, when they ran 9-11 specials, the don't show video after 5 min. before collapse, during the collapse they show fast clips and stills, with music playing...NO original audio
their equipment is much better, they record a separate audio track so it can be processed easily later...why did they play NO actual audio when the reported explosions were occurring
hgfbob 2 years ago
BTW idiot, if YOU want to debunk explosives, then concentrate on the 1st 3 flights of stairs that FDNY reported BLOWING UP, BEFORE any tower fell..
this IS an eye witnessed event...with NO logical basis for it even occurring...and all YOU an do is IGNORE IT....'cause you have too...right...you have NO f*cking answer
Why is it that NIST will base their WTC3 HYPOTHESIS...ENTIRELY... on hearsay of a couple people, but the IGNORE , the HUNDREDS of witnesses who report large concussive explosions
hgfbob 2 years ago
None of these cameras captures ANY audio of explosives BEFORE or DURING any building collapse.
There are videos where you hear booms and rumblings before the collapses. And those videos have been around for 8 years and have stood their ground pretty well against the debunkers.
JSSTyger 2 years ago
Which videos are these?
Out of the dozens of videos I've seen of the collapse of all three of the towers, NONE of them feature sounds consistent with demolition explosives.
Considering regular demolition materials are heard for MILES as I can personally verify, and these weren't even the type of explosives that can "pulverize concrete" or "thrown tons of steel hundreds of feet".
Stop embarrassing yourself silly twoofer.
KJC24 2 years ago
PAPD Police Officer Middleton- "periodically, you would hear a loud boom go off at the top of tower one. After approximately 15 minutes suddenly there was another loud boom at the upper floors, then there was a series of smaller explosions which appeared to go completely around the building at the upper floors. And another loud earth shattering blast with a large fire ball which blew out more debris"
hgfbob 2 years ago
hgfbob 2 years ago
(2)Angel Rivera FDNY
"The building was still shaking and
we're still hearing explosions going on everywhere, so we decided let's get out of here. We
ran all the way down to the fourth floor where we
ran out of stairs. There were no more stairs.
We were all like -- we could have been
over here. What happened, we looked out of the
window of the hotel, the wall, practically,
because the window was all blown up. There was
no way out. The only way out was the roof rope."
hgfbob 2 years ago
Captain Karin Deshore
The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building.
graphics8. nytimes. com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01. html?scp=2&sq=FDNY9-11transcripts&st=cse
hgfbob 2 years ago
If you had full start to finish video of each building then I would buy your logic. You do not have enough video to prove noise. nice try. I do not believe like the people running around screaming 9-11 was an inside job.{ I do however wonder where the Pentagon Video is? Why Building 7 is not in the 9-11 report? Why Bin Laden has never been charged? An American with questions does that scare you?
PirateScream 2 years ago
Incase you didn't notice I got 1+2 from start to finish. I couldn't easily find 7 from start to finish, but that's because clips on youtube only featured it as it began to fall. You can bet if explosions were heard, the clips would have included them.
7 wasn't in the comission because it wasn't an engineering report. NIST covered that.
Bin Laden was never charged because he was never caught. You ain't got questions, you are just a standard twoofer moron.
KJC24 2 years ago
NIST was not commissioned to investigate 911, we spent 20 million dollars to see if Bill got blown but 2 million for a book that gives no answers.
You charge someone so you can issue an arrest warrant, not after you arrest them dumbvass (you stepped down first)
Where is the video from all them camera's around the Pentagon that the FBI confiscated?
Peace
Suicide
PirateScream 2 years ago
NIST and the entire civil engineering scientific community agreed that there was no demolition which makes your original claim that the commission didn't look at the 7 tower moot. Nobody was killed in the WTC7 building and it wasn't directly attacked.
After 9/11 a bounty of $50 million is on the head of bin laden. FBI wants him bad
What makes you think any cameras around the pentagon had a shot? Ignoring all the witnesses, we see 1 frame of something the shape, size and color of an AA jet.
KJC24 2 years ago
NIST was Charged by Congress to find out HOW and WHY, 3 buildings fell on 9-11
on the towers, they stopped their investigation when the impact area was "poised to collapse"
on WTC7, they have YET to explain the free fall acceleration of the entire building
FBI STILL has 18 un-released videos that they confiscated showing the impact from different views
hgfbob 2 years ago
"FBI STILL has 18 un-released videos that they confiscated showing the impact from different views "
False.
Also, since if the collapse starts naturally, then HOW it collapsed WAS natural--and not a CD. Dont have to account for exactly how every rivet behaved to know it wasnt a CD.
PWNED!
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
oop's....YOUR right
not 18
try 85 unreleased confiscated video's
google can be YOUR friend too
no.....a natural structural collapse starts from a SINGULAR point, known structural failure,
laws of mechanics, conservation of energy, transference of energy, Newtons 2nd, 3rd. law... WE SEE, there is NOT consistent heat source to evenly affect the towers, for the ***unexplained release*** into the impact floor
it's ONLY being called 'natural' to serve an agenda..there is NOTHING natural about it
hgfbob 2 years ago
"try 85 unreleased confiscated video's"
LOL, try actually CHECKING the source for that. Its not 85 tapes of the pentagon. Its 85 tapes TOTAL. From all over the eastern seabaord--where ever they thought something caught a pic of the terrorists.
Google isnt your friend. FACTS can be found there. Facts are your enemy. As America is. =]
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
" natural structural collapse starts from a SINGULAR point, "
Thats the guess of an idiot.
The point stands unrefuted. Once the natural initiation occurs, the rest is the natural result.
Logic refutes kooks every time. =]
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
oh...THAT'S the reason 7 wasn't included
lol..and why include the towers, and NOT WTC7?...nice try pussy
spoken like the TRUE SHILLY ass YOU ARE...you answer questions if you can, not BULLY people for asking them
shill tactic #6....answer no questions,,,BULLY instead
he was charged for the Embassy and USS Cole bombing......and he was never caught
He was NOT charged with 9-11 cause he didn't do it....simple
so what kind of MORON does that make YOU?
hgfbob 2 years ago
The towers were hit by the planes, and were the tgt of the terroists attack. 7 wasnt,
Tell me why B 3,4,5,6 damage wasnt in the 911 report either, pussy!
"He was NOT charged with 9-11 cause he didn't do it....simple"
Right, HE didnt do it. 19 other guys did. Nice try pussy.
According to you, since the FBI hasnt charged anyone for the inside job, thats proof there was no inside job! LOLOL
SWING AND A MISS!
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
then why did 7 fall FASTER than the others?
why did it fall at a rate equivalent with the acceleration of gravity as soon as the kink is formed?
why don't YOU tell me why the Chair and Co-Chair came out with a book that the 9-11 commission was lied to and a farce, and given false information
hgfbob 2 years ago
"then why did 7 fall FASTER than the others?"
why are you a moron?
Different buildings with differnt designs suffering different damage and fires have different results.
DUH
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
Yeah, that is called a domino stack of cards construction, I heard about it in a fantasy movie.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
yeah. the fantasy movie called "Loose Change."
your bible, lololol
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
the fantasy movie called "Loose Change"? Loose Change never said that buildings are built to collapse into themselves like Building 7 and the Twin Towers. You must be thinking of the NIST report. But hey, that's not a movie!
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
"Loose Change never said that buildings are built to collapse into themselves "
Exactly retard. They never did any research. It is a propaganda video designed to get stupid fux-morons to believe an inside job.
In your case, you were the exact stupid fux moron they were looking for. It worked like a CHARM didnt it?
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
Actually I didn't watch it until I did my research.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Again, kooks lie. So Im sure you watched if the very first thing you do.
second, you havent done any research. You read propaganda sites. Research is irrefutable. Zero credibility to the inside job.
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
I'm sure you know every little detail about my life. Lets test that Edgeman, what did I have for dinner last night?
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Cock.
Lots and lots of cock.
What else?
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
I'm sure you know every little detail of my life, so you know I watched Loose Change and that convinced me. As well, you know what I ate for dinner last night.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Edgeman, I don't follow the bible. I follow the Quran. Please if your going to make wrong claims about my religon please get your facts right.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
"I follow the Quran"
Ok, I get it Achmed. Youre lying to the great satan to help your brothers in the religeon of "peace" ::giggle" get away with murdering 3000 great Americans.
Understood.
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
You are a fucking racist, like all debunkers. Proves how retarded you guys are. Please, if you have nothing to prove, don't talk to me. I really don't have time for scum.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Islam isnt a race, moron.
Finish your GED before pretending to talk smack, retard.
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
I'm not talking about Islam, you bone-head. "Ahmed" is an Arab name, indicating that you are a racist who hates Arabs (though I'm not an Arab). You better tell that to PoetryHound though because he considers anti-semites bigots and racists.
thehipsterofnewyork 2 years ago
Bravo
911missinglinksDOTcom
exposing Loose Change fairy tale
euro944t 2 years ago
seems to me that the SAME sound was heard on 9-11, EXCEPT, it is labeled as "the floors hitting each other....ANOTHER USELESS video made by a typical SHILLY idiot to ease his OWN conscience...or to spread LIES
So, which is it?
hgfbob 2 years ago
hgfbob
Can you post the video you are talking about?
oquestionador 2 years ago
v=HnbysiDFjNQ this pretty much shows that you are a complete liar
blite13 2 years ago
blite13 , all that proves is that you're an moron. Lots of things can expload in a building fire. In the Windsor tower in Madrid they reported explosions but that doesnt mean the Windsor tower was demolished. Sounds of explosions are expected in large building fires. Demolitions are timed and sequential, they dont go off randomly all over the place which is what truthers' witness talk about, either that or they are out of context and didnt mean what the truthers claim they meant.
Edbrad 2 years ago
No you dont get that on 911, we get a gradual progressive rumble. The truther leaders like David Chandler suggest they even put more explosives in the towers for the sole purpose of flinging steel around. How about WTC7 where cameras only a couple of blocks away picked up zero booms at all. Steel makes loud sounds when it breaks we can expect it to make a sound, just not demolition sounds.
Edbrad 2 years ago
v=xpoAmEGdsn4&feature=related I would take this guys word over yours ANYDAY.
blite13 2 years ago
blite13, if you take his word why dont you take the word of all the firefighters about WTC7.? NONE reported explosions. NONE reported it was strange that it collapsed. They all believed it would collase on its own. They heard it bulging, leaning, creaking and things were crackling and falling. They were literally waiting around for it to collapse so they could go in and look for their brothers. There is no dissenting opinion from ANY OF THEM. Why you are picking one guy out of everyone else?
Edbrad 2 years ago
v=HnbysiDFjNQ
blite13 2 years ago
"The URL contained a malformed video ID. "
Edbrad 2 years ago
try again, works for me.
blite13 2 years ago
Nope still doesnt work. What is the title of the video?
Edbrad 2 years ago
9/11 Eyewitness Accounts Part 1 of 2
blite13 2 years ago
Ive already replied to that on another video comment. You have to ignore all firefighters and emergency services who heard absolutely demolition sounds and who had no problem with its collapse. Who were literally waiting around for it to collapse. The firefighters report it bulging, leaning, creaking, groaning and things were crackling and falling. Why do you hate the firefighters so much?
Edbrad 2 years ago
There is a problem with comparison. How many conventional demolitions begin 80 storeys high? Does vertical displacement affect sound recording? There are most definitely explosive reports. Are they, as has been suggested, floors colliding, or are they demolition explosives? Are eyewitness accounts, including survivors from inside the towers who report explosive detonations to be discarded out of hand? Why?
Skeptickler 2 years ago
Once again we are relying on witness accounts when we can hear for ourselves.
So because the "demolition" starts slightly higher up from the ground than normal demolitions it's all of a sudden going to be silent to the many microphones that recorded the collapse?
Also amazing how the "explosives" survived the plane and fires to be detonated more than an hour later seemingly unharmed by the extreme conditions. It's just extremely stupid.
KJC24 2 years ago
KJC24, its not about ignoring eye witness its about putting them back in context. For the truth movement dont care when they said it or if they realised later what it was, if they said explosions that automatically equals explosives to them screw the context.
Edbrad 2 years ago
Skeptickler, sounds of explosions dont equal sounds of explosives. If you put the eye witness's back context they could not possibly be refering to explosives or they didnt mean what the truthers claim they meant since truthers dont care about context. Demolitions are timed and sequential they dont go off all over the place. High explosives exhibit certain properties that you dont see on 911. Explosions sounds are expected in large building fires. Even steel makes loud bangs when it breaks.
Edbrad 2 years ago
Nanoscale Chemestry Yeilds Better Explosives
Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together. One example is a gel made of an oxidizer with a fuel embedded in the pores of the gel. In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. "These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius," says Simpson.
hgfbob 2 years ago
Such thermites have traditionally been produced by mixing fine powders of metal oxides and metal fuels. "Conventionally, mixing these fine powders can result in an extreme fire hazard. Sol-gel methods can reduce that hazard while dispersing extremely small particles in a uniform way not possible through normal processing methods,"
llnl. gov/str/RSimpson.html
hgfbob 2 years ago
When I type in "nanothermite" I get nothing but truther videos. Which tells me that in reality, this substance either doesn't exist or there is nothing known about it allowing truthers to just make up their own bullshit for it.
For instance, nobody has any footage of nanothermite in action, so how can anybody say it was used to bring a tower down?
KJC24 2 years ago
dude type in nanotermite, and educate yourself a bit
DBlundon 2 years ago
DBlundon, no kind of thermite is an explosive
Edbrad 2 years ago