Added: 3 years ago
From: Triplexity
Views: 55,832
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (143)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • reminds me of costners jim garrison

  • I love this kind of shit

  • He's exactly right! There are fundamental differences between pre-humans and US! Scholars tell us it's genetic bottle-necking...forced us to evolve much quicker. Not true and many of these differences still go unexplained and evidence for such bottle-necking doesn't exist either.

  • @jamiecoursey Yes it does. Look up the Toba Eruption.

  • @ianman6... How odd that you don't get it: if I were the Genesis' ancient writer, I would have described the cloning on Adam by the Elhohims and the genetic engineering of Eve from a cell of Adam, exactly as it is described. Cloning is making someone in your image and likeness! How more precise the ancient writer could be! The God of the bible does not use magic but technology! If He said He is our God, I have no difficulty in accepting that.

  • he explains how hard it is to make the circumstances that create a fossil then he complains when there are no "missing links", He says there should be a "dozen cousins" between but then states how hard it is to create the conditions for fossils. Its hard to find something thats so rare. I love this theory but he glosses over stuff that doesnt agree with his theory just like everyone else does with their theory.

  • @ 4:00 I agree, I had a computer in 1988 and it was WAY bigger than anything on the market now, you’re telling me that WAS’NT more powerful than my current laptop? Crazy! Brain size IS relative to intelligence!

  • @sailornaruto39 - you're right. He also repeatedly implies that we evolved from Neanderthals. I don’t know which books he’s been reading or what scientific evidence that is based on.

  • hmmm he makes a premise @ 4:14 or so that implies brain size is relative to intelligence. Which i understand to not be the case

  • i was following his trail of thoughts up until he said 'bigfoot'

  • But wheres the proof it was aliens or god? What if it was a virus? or breeding with other human speices?

  • "new " discoveries which will be used to make the population believe that all religious doctrine has been misunderstood and misinterpreted" - uhm but isn't it OLD news that religious doctrine has been misunderstood and misinterpreted? Project Bluebeam sounds sensible to me.

  • "Divine intervention" theory? I thought, "Alien Intervention" theory. "Divine Intervention" - what about "Evil intervention"!

  • Speaking of a "neanderthal killing a lion". For that to happen, the neanderthal would have to weight at least a ton, have 5 times the muscle strength of a gorilla and be a NATURAL (not self-imposed) PREDATOR. That's nonsense. As for the Intervention Theory, to me that's obvious: it doesn't take a huge lot of research to realise that these despicable species must have been a product of a failed genetic experiment. There's no way on Earth Nature would devise such a piteous monster.

  • @NECROMYSTIK Read The Law of One and the Cassiopaeans Transcripts.

  • One possible theory of how we were able to successfully compete with other hominid beings such as the Neanderthal, was that we invented spears and even the bow and arrow. Neanderthals were recently known to have knives and most likely hunted animals in close contact by tackling them to the ground and or stabbing these animals to death. These Neanderthal remains were discovered to possess similar injuries to rodeo competitors. We also used our inventions to fight much stronger rivals.

  • i think that our brain has somthin to do wit this evolution

    the more we think the lesser the life span.while the less we think the long life span..

  • Wow, there is so much misinformation and crap in this presentation, the only reason he's getting away with it is because he sounds convincing to the uninformed audiance who don't know any better.

  • @ianman6 Explain that he is completely hoaxing all this.

  • @treasuredroperX I never said he was hoaxing. Just that he is overstating his claims, presents his theory as the it has more force than it does, selectively uses evidence that can be used to support his claims and ignores evidence that does not, etc. I don't think he's faking anything, and some of his objections are warrented. But the human genome shows unadulterated and very strong evidence of shared lineage with other apes, as does our morphology in the large sheme of descent with modification

  • @ianman6 Okay. But because ancient people wrote about this event, we can even more so conclude it more true then our "Sudden" knowledge income without intelligent intervention behind it.

  • @treasuredroperX What event? The genetic engineering of the human race? Ancient people wrote of creation, the texts say nothing of genetic engeneering and only a backwards reading of it into the text can lead to such an interpretation. Second, ancient people wrote in the BIble that God created Adam and then Eve from his rib. I presume you don't believe that? Why not? It escapes me why you would think that because some ancient people wrote about it that it must be true. That is profoundly strange

  • @ianman6 There is more to Adam and Eve in the Sumerian texts then whats put in the bible. Just as there is more on Genesis 6:2 in Enoch 7:1 No it doesn't make sense, until you bring the original text writers who know what their talking about in. Read more on Sumerians.

  • @treasuredroperX One example error in this presentation is that he claims the volume of neanderthal's brain was greater than ours. That is correct. But he incorrectly relates brain size to intelligence when he says "we shrunk so much and got so much smarter, figure that one out". It is well established that brain complexity and brain-body size ration are determinant factors in intelligence, not overall brain size.

  • This guy might sound like he can talk the talk, but really he can't. There's so much to comment on it's hard to know where to start.

    It's sweet though that he himself explains why there are so many missing transitions. It's a bloody miracle that fossils form, let alone we find them.

    Actually, the fact that we've found as many as we have statistically proves that they're ought to be several species we don't know about (and probably never will).

    Also, just because he says there are no similari

  • Bones

  • he cannot prove where he got those images. he could have photoshopped them. sounds like he has an agenda

  • Read " Evolution Deceit " amazing..........

  • Isn't it easy to fantasize that Chewbacca is a post-reconciliation hominoid? There's a series of movies right there!

  • Fuckers only see what they want to see. How blind these people are

  • If you want specific proof of a genetic difference here is one. Black males are 13.5 times more likely than white males to possess the MAOA-L Gene, which is associated with extreme aggression, sexual abuse, and extreme violence. You can research this yourself to verify.

  • @Castaril O.K maybe I was being a little unfair towards you; you are being misled though! It has been shown that there is a link between MAOA-L and violent behaviour but this does not mean persons with MAOA-L levels are violent people. Many studies have proven that persons with MAOA-L are likely to become violent when treated badly. Studies have also shown that children who have MAOA-L and receive physical abuse during the first three years of childhood....

  • @Castaril continues.... are likely to have lifelong behavioural issues. It has also been shown though that persons that have MAOA-L and who have been treated well during childhood show no signs of aggression during adulthood. While there is a connection between MAOA-L and violent behaviour bad parenting is the cause. All any child needs is to be treated well and MAOA-L will have no negative effect. MAOA-H more common in white people leads to other....

  • @Castaril continues.... behavioural problems leading to gambling and is very common amongst con men! Again though bad parenting is the cause. Children are born to be good, but circumstances (regardless of ones race) can lead to antisocial behaviour. Reports linking black people to bad behaviour based on their genes is abuse that can lead to antisocial behaviour. Opinions like the ones you have expressed here are the cause of hatred in black persons with MAOA-L...

  • @Castaril continues.... (who once again are being attacked because of their skin colour.) You may not be a hateful person but you are (due to reasons I have mentioned) a hate preacher. This is the kind of crap ignorant racist groups like the British National Party use as their excuse to spread hatred towards the none white population in the United Kingdom. This party has declared that they disagree with mixed marriages like my own declaring that the children of....

  • @Castaril continues.... mixed marriages are likely to be underachievers in the schools. My wife and I are intelligent people that will raise our children well and do not appreciate the attitude of inbred British National (NATZI) Party morons. It is the intention of BNP to overthrow the government legally like their true leader Adolf Hitler. Reports on racial genetics is the way they fight their campaign in an attempt to gain more white NATZI followers and you are allowing yourself....

  • @Castaril continues.... (quite foolishly) to fall for their antics. There is one big difference between BNP and NATZI and that is the NATZI party did not start out preaching hatred towards none whites but BNP began with immediate attacks on none white persons making them effectively worse!....

  • @Castaril continues.... The B******* at BNP are fuelling my hatred towards them by provoking me with the audacity to say that they disagree with me and my wife being together. BNP Just who the F*** do you think you are, go F*** yourselves you ignorant B*******! END

  • @Castaril that is absurd... you talk like you yourself have conducted the experiments and studies ...

  • Also, asians have a higher cranial capacity than whites who have a higher cranial capacity than blacks, which correlates with the average IQ. Although higher cranial capacity does not necessarily mean higher intelligence, it correlates with higher intelligence on average.

  • East Asians are closest to the greys and furthest from ape ancestors out of all human races. Largest cranial capacity (largest head to body ratio), shortest limbs to body ratio, paedomorphic (soft childlike) features, thinnest and least robust body types, calmest temperament. I do believe however that aliens created the Caucasian race last, creating a pleasant balance between the extremes of the Black and Asian race. I realize this might be considered racist, but I can't control what may be true

  • @Castaril There are so many things you have said that are terribly wrong and totally not accurate. What you are saying is virtually the same kind of things expressed by Hitler. This same logic has been used as a poor attempt to identify black peoples as an inferior race and has also been used as an excuse to treat women as inferior (especially the head to body ratio.) Your negative chanting is the reason some black people hate me for being white.....

  • @Castaril continues.... I become judged by others because of your actions and I really don’t like this. Our genes have been tracked back to Africa so there was no individual creation process on different continents. I do find ancient Chinese beliefs quite interesting though. The Chinese used to belief that they evolved separately due to the difference they could observe between themselves and the rest of the world. It was proven that the Chinese like everyone else walked out of Africa....

  • @Castaril continues.... and are part of same branch leading back to the African peoples. There was a site discovered in china where humans and Neanderthals lived at approximately the same time. It has recently been discovered that All Eurasians have some percentage of Neanderthal DNA and as yet none have been discovered not to have Neanderthal DNA. Africans however are a different story as most of them do not have Neanderthal DNA and because of this some experts....

  • @Castaril continues.... believe that humans mated with Neanderthals since this clearly wasn’t there at the start of the human genome. I don’t think this likely as separate primates are incapable of interbreeding today. It sounds like Neanderthal DNA was introduced into the human gene pool for more genetic diversity after a bottleneck event. Yourself and Hitler are wrong though as this evidence shows that Africans are a more pure form of human and the rest of us are hybrids.....

  • @Castaril continues.... Africans do not have heavier brow ridges to white people and if you look at the skull structure you will se we are virtually identical. In fact there is less genetic diversity in the whole of the human race than there is in a single tribe of chimpanzees. Human brains are the same size in humans all over the world. The average skull size is the same regardless of the country you live in. You would be surprised to discover that early humans had larger brain sizes than we...

  • @Castaril continues.... There are children at the age of eight years old with smaller brains than you and me but have considerably higher intelligence. It is clear that larger brain size does not make a person more intelligent. One thing for sure is that with as little genetic diversity as there is when a white person mates with a white person they are so closely related genetically that it is like brother f****** sister. My wife is from the Caribbean and we have more genetic diversity....

  • @Castaril continues.... One thing that will make the biggest difference of all is I would raise my children not to be as ignorant as you are. It wouldn’t matter if they have a smaller brain size or not as it would not take much educating for them to be more intelligent than you. To put it simple I will not raise them to be white trash! It would be great if we could take inbred hate preachers like you and all other hate preachers (black, white or any other colour)....

  • @Castaril continues.... put you all on an island together and blow the lot of you up. You are reason hatred exist in this world. You’re no different than the prat Malcolm X or any other hateful person. I welcome anyone that are willing to treat me as equal to themselves, as for the rest of you, you can all go F*** yourselves! END

  • @wlfmi You're wrong if you think I hate anyone. My beliefs are not based on hatred but on what I believe to be true as I have examined the evidence and used inferential reasoning. You just want to ignore the differences among different genetic groups in mankind and say we are all the same, but this is not true. Its true that blacks have a higher bone density than whites who have a higher bone density than asians.

  • I find race the most interesting aspect. I believe aliens created humans in different stages, meaning racial groups. I believe that blacks on average were the first race of humans created, but all of their features are closer to the primitive Australopithecus. For example they have thicker bone density, larger brow ridges, more sloping foreheads, smaller cranial capacity etc. compared to other races. Asians are on the complete opposite side of the spectrum with whites being in between.

  • @eskimokid he didn’t do this to deceive, it’s just presentation. I was taught in school with examples of chimpanzee transforming into human with five drawings. The point is clear and more would be pointless. He could have included many more but they would have just shown the same thing. Each change is more like a transformation than a transition.

  • Why would there be a HUMAN bone in the PRE-HUMAN fossils? If there were I would be very concerned...

  • @eskimokid I think the point is that we do not see any gradual changes to fit evolution theory. The bones are very different with no transitions.

  • @wlfmi There are more transitional forms than the 6 that he displays...it is easy to fail to include some crucial fossils just to prove his point.

  • Patterson Gimlin Film of Bigfoot 1969: What’s most surprising are the (so-called) fake footprints discovered at the site that looks just like australopithecine. What’s even more surprising is that australopithecine footprints were not discovered until more than ten years later. When people create a hoax there are so many obvious mistakes. In the Patterson Gimlin film not one mistake has been made. If this video is a hoax it is the best hoax in the whole of history! Conclusion? Bigfoot is real!

  • Hey just wondering when he said these bigfoot creatures are found, when and where, because I haven't seen a single one, I haven't seen one convincing photo and everyone now has cameras, there are no videos, no bodies have ever been found. So does he mean sightings have been reported in these areas, because sightings reported is not the same thing as found. Now maybe I'm wrong, so feel free to point me in the direction of convincing evidence.

  • thanx for uploading these vids

  • Everyone who is watching this and is intrigued by human origins, i would like to recommend the book intelligent design: Message from the designers. You can read it online :) Just another fascinating theory that does not involve "god" creating human origins.

  • He's a closet young earth creationist.

  • He said no however he does have a point!

  • yuk

  • i don't think big foot yeti ect exist. we would have some concrete proof yet we have none.

  • gradually transition would have to be present in the process of evolution but not if we were genetically engineered by an advanced alien species,our DNA is fused together which does not occur in nature.Our DNA is only 2 percent off from primates.

  • I fuckin Love this! Wow!

  • Humans are human, monkeys are monkeys. Ignorants will stay idiot.

  • MujaRagHeadKillaUK agreed bloody aesop fable

  • This gibberish is based on the thoroughly debunked Freemason Zechariah Sitchin.

  • actually, homo sapiens lived along with the neanderthals.

  • @drolet88, please consider that We 'lived' along side them till Neandrethals' figured out we would gladly 'extinct' them at our earliest opportunity. Thats why they live(presently) where they are safe from us. I have reliable 'known to me' wittness of Bigfoot in W. Wa. state.

    If Neandrethal was still here only 30,000 years ago, who can say that they are all gone? Why can't Bigfoot be exactly what Pye postulates?

  • 1:25 - VERY important point.

  • Does yettis still wander in the forests?

  • Ok you lost me when you started talking about yetties? Has anyone actually seen a Yetti? Where does these Yetties live? I would love to see that with my own eyes:)

  • read the Thiaoouba Prophecy book for Free on Google Books.

    intelligent humanoids came from Space and merged with local primates

  • 1 problem,  humans did not evolve from Neanderthals, we have a acommon ancestor

  • He didn't say we evolved from them, as later he says we wiped them out. Listen to :58 onwards, he is saying the opposite to what you thought he was saying.

  • ya, i get what he's saying, that we were geneticly engineered by aliens, I know the story well, i've read the sumarian tablets. But he implys that the theory of evolution claims we evolved from neanderthal, which is not true, we have a common ancestor, but we did not evolve directly from them,that's like putting a chimp in the human line of evolution, we are not decendents of chimps, we have a common ancestor

  • Well, he's saying that the theory of evolution once claimed we were descended from neanderthal, and I think I remember that in the early days of the theory, the turn of the century scientific community did believe that, until the evidence became clear we were not.

  • Too bad there are so many ignorant baffoons that have NO clue to the written past. What Mr. Pye is saying is based on scientific & historical proof! We ARE a result of genetic engineering! The truth is plain to see & hard for the lemmings of the world to comprehend. When they realize that they are also a product of mass mind control & religious conditioning, maybe they can pull thier heads out of the sand become free-thinking, intelligent individuals! They probably think terrorists DID 9-11!

  • @hipnlip Hip, I bet they think Obama is a natral born citizen ofthe USA. to,

  • @hipnlip THANK YOU! It's good to know there are other people in this world that realize what the f*ck is going on!

  • Evolution is a fact, like Gravity, but when it comes to humans, there are (if Lloyd Pye is telling the truth) a number anomalies indicating Extraterrestrial intervention in HUMAN evolution. HOWEVER!!! I would like to see his model and explanation of Human Migration.

  • I'm not sure about it myself, but I find it interesting. I'd be shocked if your criticism was any more advanced than an appeal to authority or likewise an appeal to popularity.

  • @ amalek80

    Well, you might be shocked to learn that the earth is round, too. Have you read the first paragraph in the description box?

    "According to the Intervention theory humans are a genetically engineered hybrid of Hominoid - the native being of Earth and Anunnaki - the Sumerian gods of extraterrestrial origin."

    lol

    It suggests that we are hybrids of pre-human hominoids and SUMERIAN GODS FROM OUTER SPACE. What's their evidence? Neanderthals are slightly different from humans. ROFLMAO!!!

  • technically, "slightly different" is a highly-ignorant description of the difference between us and what they claim as our nearest ancestor. i would probably use the words "vast, and scientifically unexplained". this guy probably isn't exactly right...but he's lightyears closer than your mcmillan science book was.

  • "technically, 'slightly different' is a highly-ignorant description of the difference between us and [neanderthal].'"

    I'm highly-ignorant? haha, what am I ignoring, that human and neanderthal DNA are 99.5%-99.9% identical? lol

    "i would probably use the words 'vast, and scientifically unexplained'"

    That's because you don't know what you're talking about, and you're unaware that Pye also doesn't know what he's talking about.

    Please, describe the "vast" difference between us and neanderthals.

  • theshredator ,also are DNA is almost identical to the pig ! Thats why we make body parts out of pigs DNA !

  • rubbish! of course there isnt a single human bone in pre humans the word pre humans means before human. this bloke would understand that if only he read a dictionary.

  • "of course there isnt a single human bone in pre humans the word pre humans means before human."

    Lol. I laughed when I heard that, too.

  • evolution is based on observation and carefuly recorded data no one concocted anything and what this bloke is presenting in this video is based on speculation and false premises the scientific community considers this intervention theory psudo science.

  • please explain the missing chromosomes. one of many many issues standing in the way of your theory. please, i'm listening.

  • they arent missing the so called missing chromosomes were found to be held together in end cap sequences called telomeres way back in 1982 and it has been common knowledge to all evolutionary biologists since then. mr lloyd often ignores these facts by the scientific community because most people want to believe in a creator and thats fine i believe in a divine intelligence myself but, faith must never infringe upon scientific fact there must be a balance between the two.

  • There will always be lost connections and missing links. To plot the entire history of this planet requires MASSIVE amounts of information most of which has been lost in the happenings of the Earth. There's always going to be speculation and for as long as we're going to be looking into it, there's going to be a difference of opinion. Most of "our truth" is based on the information we aquire as children, but the issue's not what we accept it's what we won't accept

  • so going by his logic, that these fossils are very rare then mabey the missing 20 links or so just so happen to not have been fosilized...not such a fun take on it but it begs the question

  • *****

  • What I'm saying is that British Scientists as well as Germans were manipulating and distorting as well as making up evidence and theories about

    the evolution of man from apes. Look up the Piltdown Man Hoax. Some scientist got a MBE from the Queen for it. Later it was proven FALSE.

  • The British Scientists started this Evolution Crap

    during the 1930s and 40s and it was shown later that everything they said was concocted .

  • sorry,are you saying that british scientists started the theory of evolution in the 1930s and 40s?

  • Yes it was all concocted like your god and retarded religion (fairytales).

  • @MujaRagHeadKillaUK I wouldn't call them fairytales. Just a misunderstanding on what was going on. It never does make sense to anyone until they look at the true translations.

  • this guy is fairly intelligent and or convincing. although there are likely more subspecies of sasquatch type creatures than 4 as he states.

  • i believe there are many alien visitors responsible for the creation of human species. but nobody has the real truth yet! i think we will find out soon where we really came from!!

  • uhhh..he didnt say Satan created humans he said the annunaki did

  • @dimitriuss He said that humans directly came from Neanderthals. That is false and any scientist will laugh at his ignorance. They were a separate species of human.

    But I don't worry about trolls. His beliefs will never be taught in schools.

  • yea thrasher monkeys would eventually evolve... but you forget we've only been on earth as humans with records for around 5,000 years. and monkeys don't evolve that fast... takes billions you idiot.

  • hahaha the alians combined us with monkeys, made man. took his damn rib and genetecly made him a woman. lmao

  • it was obviously a white bearded man up in the clouds, who came down after he made the earth in 6 days, rested, then made us out of clay then made women from one of our ribs, and put us in some garden....

    if your view is of darwins evolution...why the fuck are there still monkeys around now? wouldnt they have evolved?

    please carry on lyao, you have no intellect or reasoning within your 'unevolved', 'divine' little mind!

  • nice try... takes billions of years for evolution. thier already adapted to thier enviroment on second note. no need to readapt.

  • well if we came from monkeys , WHY DIDN'T WE ADAPT?

    tosser.....

  • buddy that makes no sense. thats exactly why we went from apeman to human... it was adaptation... we weren't like monkeys you see at a zoo. names for pre human apemen are homo egasters, homo hablis, homo sapien, homo neanderthal. and we did adapt... homo hablis were hairy... the next generation wasn't so they could sweat and keep cool... thats when we became homo egasters... then we adapted with tools and creative thinking thus homo sapien. which is what you are... a homo.

  • your arogance is astounding, we obviously did come from some sort of apelike creature, but without the interferance of an outside intelligence we would still be apelike. 100s of thousands of years without evolution, but in the last 10 thousand we have jumped from living in packs like monkeys to living in the middle of technology and civilisation.

    i bow down to your superiour knowledge, you obviously know the truth of existence.... what a wanker!

  • fuckinthrasher76's 'bitch slap' was well administered and well needed!

  • i take it your another bible bashing preacher? everyone is wrong except you eh?, and if your against people having their own opinions, your as up your own arse as the other muppet.

    that aint a bitch slap, its a thai roundhouse to the jaw, adios muchachos.

  • Hmmmm, I'm on your side shitty-arse! Read what I typed before going off on one again.

  • you should make it clearer who was being 'bitch slapped', i thought you meant i got bitch slapped.

    oh well....

  • so thier ya go. your a failure to argument.

  • my arrogance? ya with two R's... but its ok i won't judge your ability to spell. but lets see hum.... technology has nothing to do with evolution. evolution is physical features buddy. and in the last 10,000 years nothings changed becaues you can't see it yet. give it aboutt 100,000 years. thier was no interference from an outside intelligence because magic don't exist buddy. and the bible's full of a whole bunch of magic. so suck it.

  • 'my arrogance? ya with two r's'

    i beg your forgiveness for being born dyslexic, i should just keep my mouth shut eh?

    'magic'???

    there is no magic involved with genetically engineering humans, there was no magic involved when scientists grew an ear on a mouse' back was there? scientists have been able to enhance and change animals behaviour through genetics. so just imagine what a higher intelligence could do with apes?

    your entitled to your opinion, but your aRRogance of others', is wrong.

  • you have no idea what your talking about so i'm going to go else where to someone who wasn't born to a dad/uncle and mother/aunt. have fun in hell. the place where things burn for no apparent reason.(magic)

  • your failure to contructivley debate speaks volumes about your personality.

    i dont know what im talking about, but of course you do, unbelievable arrogance.

    and by the way may mam is from india and my father is from the netherlands, so your incest theorie is blown out the window, so fuck you, you bible preaching know it all. good bye.

  • Reminds me of this History Chanel documentary about the pygmy creatures in Indonesia that were harassing the villagers in the 1800's. And they found young/recent bones...

  • Comment removed

  • "Sasquatch (Of whom a Canadienne Province was so foolishly named after)"

    ROFLMAO

  • lmao

  • I'm sorry, I can't help but comment. Canadienne? Really? You just made me feel really sad.

    And Saskatchewan wasn't named after sasquatch (though I can see why you would think that). It comes from the native name for the Saskatchewan River that translates to "The river that flows swiftly."

  • atleast its better than the 'adam n eve' shit.

  • LOL, dam right!

  • Seriously... very provocative.

  • @Indiaexpress the adam and eve shit was a metaphor for the story of the anunnaki. from what I understand, the entire bible is as well. Christ didnt die on the cross, he all took of to india and went to the secret school of Buddha. He wasnt God either, he was a spiritual master..like Buddha..so ive herd.

  • very interesting and nice presentation. have no problem with this stuff at all - if it is so, it is so. however, it is worth bearing in mind that the observer tends to find what he expects in the material. at one time the best minds around could prove the earth was flat.

  • Part of me wishes someone "reputable" WOULD make a point by point rebuttal of Pye's theory.

    For those hedging their bets and saying that there still isn't any real "proof" the human race is an Annunaki-hominid hybrid, what "evidence," in addition to the ABUNDANCE of supporting evidence already presented, would it take to convince you? A "reputable" source, with the "proper" establishment connections and credentials, who AGREED with him?

    If so, consider yourself MIND-FUCKED.

  • word

    love, peace n' ganja

    Syn'Se

  • By Ganja, you mean Marijuana?

  • lol "primo nitches"

  • this guy is a riot i like him. Interesting cultural development.

  • you know what's weird....My father and I were having an out of the blue talk about this yesterday. And now for me to find this vid...THANKS FOR UPLOADING!!!

  • U should study Cheikh Anta Diop

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more