Holy crap! Now I know why people like Bolet. Thank you for posting this - and with such high quality too!!! I will be looking forward to listening to more Bolet in my future :D
I saw him perform live at the Sydney Opera House in the 90s and he was a fine stock of both man and performer, and his encores were very well picked and apt. Truly a great performer devoid of that stupid 'sway'...I have seen some of the younger ones fall off their performing chair and laughter has abounded, very appropriate.
Freaking fantastic!!! What a fantastic... FanTASTIC.
I can't say enough, I was so TAKEN by his interpratation. What a magnificent musical mind. Did I say fantastic?? No? Then I'll have to say it then.. Fantastic!
The Greatest Artists are always in control. Bolet is such a fine example of just such artistry. The American obsession with excitement and show subsides occasionally, and at these moments, artists like Bolet will be noticed and revered, as they should be. This murderous Coda requires understanding and respect for the architecture- not just musicality, wild abandon, and technique.
@GhostChance1, so beautifully said! I read once that Bolet didn't think much of Horowitz' flailing--he thought it degraded the instrument. I wonder what Mr. Bolet would have said about Zimmerman...?
Jorge Bolet was a very tall man. Hence the hunching over. His hands were large, too, although slender. I think that accounts for much of his technique.
ahhh Sissco thank you... I've never heard the Ballade played like that. He made me feel every single note. And the coda! the final part of the coda is stumbling.
I heard Bolet twice in person: in recital in NY (he played Haydn F Minor Vars., Brahms Handel Vars., Liszt Sonata & 12th Rhapsody); and with orchestra in NJ (Rachmaninov #2). He was GOOD, but I was slightly disappointed...he is absolutely MAGNIFICENT here in Chopin Ballade--also fabulous in Chopin 3rd Sonata. I think he could be a bit overly cautious in some of his perfs, as were many other great artists (like Godowsky), but I think his reputation as one of the great pianists is now secure
underrated is an underrated way of putting it....plain and simple, he was robbed of the recongition he deserved, because alot of people were so enthralled by rubinstein and horowitz...sure two great masters of the piano....but bolet produced sounds and phrases that the other two dreamed about ....no offense fans...but absolutely true! in my opinion, as far as sound goes, and judging by his liszt and chopin recordings, jorge bolet was the best piano player / interpretur, throughout the 1900's
YES! His rendition of Chopin's nocturne in F minor op. 55 no. 1 is the epitome of excellent technique and feeling and interpretation for chopin pieces.
@moonlightgarden12am as I always say, if you want to be good it's in the fingers, heart and mind.... but if you want to be famous it's all in the eyebrows....
I guess Bolet is simply the kind of pianist that requires a more thorough understanding in music to appreciate.
I absolutely agree with you on the sound part,
Bolet can create the most amazing sound with whatever piano.
Also, his study on counter-melodies is always superb.
However, as far as force is concerned, he always seems to put grace and poise as his priority. Hence when a piece requires a bit of fury, he always comes slightly short.
@sealkingdaniel well sir i agree with everything u say till the very end...then i strongly disagree with your last statement....and instead of using my words to debate this subject i will only challenge you listen to bolets interpretation of liszts funerailles (the march movement)....and i can guarantee you once having done so, you will see that the only thing that comes up short is your last two sentences...
@sealkingdaniel or if funerailles does not convince you of his ability to "create fury" as you say (which i dont see how it could not), another peice to help shed some light this matter would be his interpretation of reminescence of don juan..and.after listening to either or both of these masterpeices im sure you will see that indeed a hurricane was only just waiting under his fingernails for the right moment to leash havoc
@moonlightgarden12am I agree completely - read my comment below. A sad tendency for listeners who don't themselves invest significant time at the piano is to assume that the great names always have the best interpretations of every piece they play. No trusim is more absurd. Neither Rubinstein's f minor Ballade, facile and perfunctory, nor Horowitz's, nervous and skittery, can come close to matching the combined fragrant poetry and epic, soaring grandeur of Bolet's transcendental performance.
The order, timing, emphasies, dynamics..everything is absolute poetry! Absolutely correct @m 37 where LH octaves enter. How wonderful you play the spaces between the notes. You are truly Godly!
This is definitely one of the 3 or 4 best Chopin Fourth Ballades I have ever heard! I am more impressed with Bolet's performance each time I hear it! Bolet was a titan among pianists....and his Chopin is every bit as brilliant as his Liszt!
Magisterial....he builds the climaxes so well, knowing when to hold back. Many pianists speed up when there's a crescendo (so many artists accel. @ m 37 where LH octaves enter), but Bolet holds everything under control. And the line, the line! Nothing is ever done for "effect"--it's always at the service of the music. Bolet was a patrician.
he looks a little bit stiff, but his music is completely different! i like his playing a lot! it's amazing. the piano is singing. he has everything under control. an honest artist! thank you!
Not fiery enough eh? Well lets take a look at the score. does Chopin write agitato or any change in tempo markings at all until the accelerando? No. The 5 chords are marked pp and the coda is f. this implies a stark contrast but the f isnt the loudest marking, it has to allow for a ff later on. this has all been taken into account in this performance. the tempo is just right to allow a decent accelerando and the forte just right to allow a fortissimo.
This interpretation is first-rate. But, you know-most pianists play the last 4 chords completely out of rhythm. If you count in 6 (counting 8ths) the last 4 chords should be longer. I don't know why everyone seems to do that-even some of the greats!
I don't think that really matters. They just try to make them climactic. Personally, I like them to be fairly brisk, but others like to drag them out.
@misotoma No, he's actually much better than Horowitz in the f minor Ballade, and in much else of the Chopin and Liszt repertoire as well. I am a tremendous Horowitz fan, but Bolet is universally recognized as one of the greatest pianists of the 20th Century. To his students he stressed a strong but flexible rhythm, a warm, singing tone, broad (not overly fast) tempos and clear articulation even in the most rapid passages, all very much in evidence here. Not a bad way to play the piano.
Rubato all over the pieces and at one's ease is obviously no taste and ruin of music, this performance is just the opposite, proper phrasing and rubato, full tone, you may say "his technique is........ " but abusolutely not on his interpretation
when talking 'bout rubato with "class" and taste, especially in Chopin's works, it's not about how he played in in "french salon" or how special you could make the piece become, it's about the all and the one! in a "phrase" or a passage, you pull/draw, and you retract, just like a elastic rubber band - while you pull it, some parts of this band is soft and lengthened, some parts are tightened. What to do to make it still a whole piece instead of snap it?
those who said that "a student sitting and practicing with a metronome" , might have no idea what's the difference between "generally keeping the tempo" , and "playing like machine/metronome"
do you have any idea of the elastic theory, or say "rubber band way" of playing Chopin's works???
Interesting to watch this great performance by another pianist capable of thinking outside of a box-these are always my favourites.Of course this Ballade presents unusual technical difficulties which increase as the work unfolds-and in a more concentrated way than in Chopin's most difficult work, the Allegro de Concert Op.46-which hardly anyone plays nowadays for some obscure reason.Many thanks,Sissco.
Each in their own way is very difficult. I would say in total, I find the 4th ballade the hardest to play well - its coda being the biggest challenge of them all. The third ballade is more difficult than most people imagine partly because it is so mellow and seemingly laidback. The coda of the second ballade is also very difficult to pull off well.
this comment makes no sense to me.. how can u try to bundle up the ballades in their own corners by rank of difficulty?? thats so silly. maybe u need to play all 4 of them.. then u can say something meaningful. (to see what i mean look Berezovsky ballade no. 2 F minor)
I think the pedaling in the A-flat Ballade is quite tricky...the only Chopin piece I have found with more difficult pedaling is the Barcarolle, Op. 60. A whole book could be written about pedaling in Chopin. What's even better is to find a really good teacher who can teach it...though somebody once wrote flatly that pedaling cannot be taught. I frankly think a good ear and good listening are the requirements for good pedaling.
The 11th Ballade in F-Double Sharp Quadruple minor, Op.93b is the most difficult in my opinion. His Ballade No.6 in C-Triple Flat major, Op.-47 is the easiest I think.
Good luck finding those sheets! They are more difficult to find than learning the pieces. hehe
The last four notes of the bar just before the four last big chords are absolute magic (at 4:28)!! Although certainly not the way Chopin wrote or intended them to be played, they are so original to Maestro Bolet and the most exciting ending to this masterpiece I've ever heard any pianist perform! This guy is my new favorite artist! I'm sorry he's long gone now and I never got to see him live.
I personally enjoyed this interpretation more than Rubinstein's 1959 recording(which i absolutely adore). So focussed, so exploratory, so fluid, and sure. This is, in my opinion, where musicians should be going with their music, not faking orgasms with their facial expressions and hoping that all that wasted energy will positively translate to their music. Beautiful, artistic playing.
I just think it looks fucking stupid and takes away from the music. A bit of a smirk here and there is just fine, and so is showing-off, and doing controversial things like telling Leonard Bernstein to take a hike(like Glenn Gould did), but after a while, it gets to be really fucking stupid, all of it.
Wow! I wish you could do slow motion on YouTube, because watching this guy's fingers is like watching a thoroughbred racehorse running! Superb. And true, no facial expressions, no wild body movements, nothing to distract from his art and the composer's intentions! First class. Is Bolet still alive?
yeah its kinda like Horowitz.. this guy does kill the ending theme of this Ballade.. unlike Zimerman where he throws off alot of flare.. but still.. i have to say that bits and pieces from Bolet/Zimerman interpretations' would make an amazing ballade. Especially Bolets final 2 mins.
Yeah your right. He is amazing the way he plays, and handles the piece. I would have loved to see him play Chopin's Nocturnes, from hearing on what Sissco has he is a great interpreter on at least those 2 he has recorded. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this guy is really different.
I can't decide who's performance of this peice is better, Bolet's or Zimmerman's. I like Zimmerman's coda better than Bolet's, but Bolet's left-hand arpegios are more exciting. Plus, I think Zimmerman is in love with himself... heh heh... overall, if I could play as well as either of them, I'd be happy!
um, Horowitz's performance of this piece was the most whacked thing I had ever heard him play. I think there's a reason he withdrew that recording shortly after its release. I could hardly believe my ears..
I recommend the Novaes recording (late 1960s, at the end of her career). It has such sweep and nobility. I wouldn't say it's better than the Bolet performance here, but it's one of my favorites. I'd take it over Horowitz, Rubinstein or any of the younger pianists of today.
The sound he produces from the piano is exquisite...
carlhopkinson 1 month ago
Comment removed
hayesy316 1 month ago
wow: when he turns up the volume at around 1.49.....
bratzko79 5 months ago in playlist Chopin Piano Works
O-M-G
1q2w3e4r660 7 months ago
Best version I've ever seen
zwergnaase90 7 months ago
That was very nice. I could have seen him play at a local college in New Jersey for $5 in the early 80's. I wish I had gone.
mikex01234 8 months ago
Holy crap! Now I know why people like Bolet. Thank you for posting this - and with such high quality too!!! I will be looking forward to listening to more Bolet in my future :D
dberry02jr 8 months ago
I saw him perform live at the Sydney Opera House in the 90s and he was a fine stock of both man and performer, and his encores were very well picked and apt. Truly a great performer devoid of that stupid 'sway'...I have seen some of the younger ones fall off their performing chair and laughter has abounded, very appropriate.
s1earle 9 months ago
WOW!!
twotwothousand 9 months ago
This ballad is almost a symphony, and Bolet gives the most coherant and convincing interpretation i've come across.
MinorityMans 11 months ago
If you could smash a piano like you could smash a guitar, you'd do it after this piece.
hayesy316 11 months ago 2
@hayesy316 AHAHAHA i laughed at your comment, obviously haha:) but i agree! i love the end to this Ballade!
SilenceTheQuiet 1 month ago
There is one word only - brilliant!
Ritorneremo1 11 months ago
Merci,Sissco, pour cette superbe découverte, pour moi... Magnifique interprétation, sa main gauche m' envoûte... Que c' est beau...
Vive CHOPIN, vive BOLET !!!......
etiam161036 11 months ago
I have a CD of him playing many of Liszt most's technical works and he nails all of them perfectly.
4thlord51 11 months ago
I wish I could produce such a beautiful tone in this piece like Bolet did.
calcmandan 1 year ago
3:20 that chord is so beautiful...
fledgehog 1 year ago
i think this is the best interpretation of the ballade i have heard.
fichan25052505 1 year ago
Great Maestro!!!
gianpaga11 1 year ago
This is the best version I have heard! Simply amazing. He makes it look so easy and soo much emotion he puts into it!!
cgjr91 1 year ago
Freaking fantastic!!! What a fantastic... FanTASTIC.
I can't say enough, I was so TAKEN by his interpratation. What a magnificent musical mind. Did I say fantastic?? No? Then I'll have to say it then.. Fantastic!
calcmandan 1 year ago
Second best after Zimerman
stefanpetkovic 1 year ago
@stefanpetkovic Correction second best after Perlemuter
Elsenrail29 1 month ago
this is first class piano playing..
FishGush 1 year ago
what is the thing where he sat?
4785689 1 year ago
@4785689 it's called a piano
lacrymosa85 1 year ago
0:53 Bolet always puts in his little extra grace notes in random spots and theyre always awesome!
kazuya31 1 year ago
a great master.. outstanding performance.
FishGush 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow This Sounds Realy Grait Thank
You For This Amazing Upload And
This Music Has A Ever Lasting Value
{Elegance} {{Always}}
SoundSystem4 1 year ago
How could ANYONE call Chopin a drawing-room composer? This is the Polish equivelant of Napolion crossing the Alps!
marginallymental 1 year ago
he looks like hitler
lambomb222 1 year ago
@lambomb222 you're an idiot...
solow1991 1 year ago
@solow1991 whaaatttt he does look like hitler
lambomb222 1 year ago
Bolet's phrasing is fantastic! One of Chopin's greatest compositions IMO.
AlexAlcyone 1 year ago
The Greatest Artists are always in control. Bolet is such a fine example of just such artistry. The American obsession with excitement and show subsides occasionally, and at these moments, artists like Bolet will be noticed and revered, as they should be. This murderous Coda requires understanding and respect for the architecture- not just musicality, wild abandon, and technique.
Thanks for posting this!
GhostChance1 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
marginallymental 1 year ago
@GhostChance1, so beautifully said! I read once that Bolet didn't think much of Horowitz' flailing--he thought it degraded the instrument. I wonder what Mr. Bolet would have said about Zimmerman...?
marginallymental 1 year ago
I get nervous watching him sitting so hunched at the keyboard, but the sound he generates is extraordinary.
HyperLisztFan 1 year ago
wow.. i'm speechless, meastro bolet.
FishGush 1 year ago
Jorge Bolet was a very tall man. Hence the hunching over. His hands were large, too, although slender. I think that accounts for much of his technique.
marginallymental 1 year ago
Comment removed
marginallymental 1 year ago
very lovely and the ending was perfect!
apples171717 1 year ago
what a neat and original ending.
such clear, and perfectly articulated playing
aslanov 1 year ago
Comment removed
NekoKingdom 2 years ago
Flawless!
Fine interpretation.
hybridamerica 2 years ago
a ver, si alguien no le gusta como toca, ke toke como bolet y luego opine, sera posible?
baxuashvili 2 years ago
Bravíssimo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
satsatur 2 years ago
Great Chopin with beautifully played!!!!!
samuelngkee 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think its a good interpretation of the piece. He plays the notes so clearly. However, I prefer Rafal Blechacz.
fredericballade4 2 years ago
He plays the ending "cascade" section of the coda so clearly and beautifully.
Gothic1982 2 years ago 11
C'est énorme ce qu'il arrive à faire ! Magnifique !
Venoks 2 years ago 6
Incredible playing! Bolet's command of the keyboard was matched by just a very few others - and maybe even unsurpassed.
dexterityhunter 2 years ago
Sissco for President!!!!!
jubulalau 2 years ago
i like it
DrJobs 2 years ago
Great Interpretation....I prefer Zimerman's playing however this is full of passion and very well played
sebastianrc 2 years ago 3
Me too, Zimmerman's Chopin ballades are incredible.
220392123 2 years ago
This is the absolute perfect piece for piano.
Trisinty09 2 years ago 2
One of my favorite pianists
jku9870 2 years ago 2
SOUL....
SHINYamAHA21 2 years ago 3
He is like many of the greatest pianists of this century rolled into one. Depth
cellestialX 2 years ago 4
Veramente grazie! Thank you! Magnificent!
gianpaga11 2 years ago 5
ahhh Sissco thank you... I've never heard the Ballade played like that. He made me feel every single note. And the coda! the final part of the coda is stumbling.
fabscud 2 years ago 5
Mi amigo,JORGE BOLET,interpreta Chopin "A LA GRAN MANERA".Qué injusto es que esté casi olvidado.
jorgeliebermann 2 years ago 2
Bolet, whom I heard play several times in NYC, was in my opinion a superb master and a little underrated...... what do you all think?
TJFNYC212 2 years ago 4
I heard Bolet twice in person: in recital in NY (he played Haydn F Minor Vars., Brahms Handel Vars., Liszt Sonata & 12th Rhapsody); and with orchestra in NJ (Rachmaninov #2). He was GOOD, but I was slightly disappointed...he is absolutely MAGNIFICENT here in Chopin Ballade--also fabulous in Chopin 3rd Sonata. I think he could be a bit overly cautious in some of his perfs, as were many other great artists (like Godowsky), but I think his reputation as one of the great pianists is now secure
soami2u 2 years ago 4
underrated is an underrated way of putting it....plain and simple, he was robbed of the recongition he deserved, because alot of people were so enthralled by rubinstein and horowitz...sure two great masters of the piano....but bolet produced sounds and phrases that the other two dreamed about ....no offense fans...but absolutely true! in my opinion, as far as sound goes, and judging by his liszt and chopin recordings, jorge bolet was the best piano player / interpretur, throughout the 1900's
moonlightgarden12am 2 years ago 37
YES! His rendition of Chopin's nocturne in F minor op. 55 no. 1 is the epitome of excellent technique and feeling and interpretation for chopin pieces.
220392123 2 years ago 2
@moonlightgarden12am as I always say, if you want to be good it's in the fingers, heart and mind.... but if you want to be famous it's all in the eyebrows....
AlexAlcyone 1 year ago 2
@AlexAlcyone
LOL!! You are SO CORRECT!!!
sophsdtr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@moonlightgarden12am Wow This Sounds Realy Grait Thank
You For This Amazing Upload And
This Music Has A Ever Lasting Value
{Elegance} Always}}
SoundSystem4 1 year ago
@moonlightgarden12am
I guess Bolet is simply the kind of pianist that requires a more thorough understanding in music to appreciate.
I absolutely agree with you on the sound part,
Bolet can create the most amazing sound with whatever piano.
Also, his study on counter-melodies is always superb.
However, as far as force is concerned, he always seems to put grace and poise as his priority. Hence when a piece requires a bit of fury, he always comes slightly short.
sealkingdaniel 1 year ago
@sealkingdaniel well sir i agree with everything u say till the very end...then i strongly disagree with your last statement....and instead of using my words to debate this subject i will only challenge you listen to bolets interpretation of liszts funerailles (the march movement)....and i can guarantee you once having done so, you will see that the only thing that comes up short is your last two sentences...
moonlightgarden12am 1 year ago
@sealkingdaniel or if funerailles does not convince you of his ability to "create fury" as you say (which i dont see how it could not), another peice to help shed some light this matter would be his interpretation of reminescence of don juan..and.after listening to either or both of these masterpeices im sure you will see that indeed a hurricane was only just waiting under his fingernails for the right moment to leash havoc
moonlightgarden12am 1 year ago
@moonlightgarden12am I agree completely - read my comment below. A sad tendency for listeners who don't themselves invest significant time at the piano is to assume that the great names always have the best interpretations of every piece they play. No trusim is more absurd. Neither Rubinstein's f minor Ballade, facile and perfunctory, nor Horowitz's, nervous and skittery, can come close to matching the combined fragrant poetry and epic, soaring grandeur of Bolet's transcendental performance.
MISHA1119 1 year ago
@MISHA1119
Holy crap dude, that description is the bomb!
Mihai127 11 months ago
@moonlightgarden12am I thoroughly agree with you! I understand his teacher was a student of Lizst.
But anyway, his recordings of Chopins Ballades are my definite favorite. Rubinstein comes in there better close though...
buddydog1956 6 months ago
It sounds like Bella Davidovitch's version... in better.
I like that.
Lyapazavecunhee 2 years ago
Bolet and Rubinstein are the masters of Chopin interpretations.
Bolet was a piano genius.
Excellent!
10 stars.
ClassicalOJazz 2 years ago 5
Superb performance!
ClassicalOJazz 2 years ago 3
This is sure more poetry than Zimmermann...IMHO
SwePianoholic 2 years ago
lol yea.. 4:28 certainly took me by surprise. excellent recording.. such a heart-wrenching piece.
asdfgftw 2 years ago
is he sitting on a bamboo chest ?
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
Good, but in my humble opinion Zimerman is on a higher level on every account.
tweriovnzxclb 2 years ago
The order, timing, emphasies, dynamics..everything is absolute poetry! Absolutely correct @m 37 where LH octaves enter. How wonderful you play the spaces between the notes. You are truly Godly!
jei66 2 years ago
this is the hardest Ballade.
laqin007 2 years ago
This is definitely one of the 3 or 4 best Chopin Fourth Ballades I have ever heard! I am more impressed with Bolet's performance each time I hear it! Bolet was a titan among pianists....and his Chopin is every bit as brilliant as his Liszt!
soami2u 3 years ago
MASTERPIECE......no words....
satothequeen 3 years ago 3
CHOPIN WAS GOD. Nothing else...
joaquindalessio 3 years ago 2
How about...touched by god.
bfoolish2006 3 years ago 3
Magisterial....he builds the climaxes so well, knowing when to hold back. Many pianists speed up when there's a crescendo (so many artists accel. @ m 37 where LH octaves enter), but Bolet holds everything under control. And the line, the line! Nothing is ever done for "effect"--it's always at the service of the music. Bolet was a patrician.
soami2u 3 years ago 3
He makes it look like I could play it. Of course, I can't. Wonderful.
FredilYupigo 3 years ago 2
@FredilYupigo That's what I thought--at first. Then it got more difficult.
gladandgood 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I prefer Stanislaw Bunin's interpretation.
herbatadom 3 years ago
it was well performed ... but I found it a bit dry. It didn't keep my attention as other performers have done so.
It's perfect ... technically and musically ... but there's just something missing ...
bojsa85 3 years ago
he looks a little bit stiff, but his music is completely different! i like his playing a lot! it's amazing. the piano is singing. he has everything under control. an honest artist! thank you!
klausknulp 3 years ago 6
Not fiery enough eh? Well lets take a look at the score. does Chopin write agitato or any change in tempo markings at all until the accelerando? No. The 5 chords are marked pp and the coda is f. this implies a stark contrast but the f isnt the loudest marking, it has to allow for a ff later on. this has all been taken into account in this performance. the tempo is just right to allow a decent accelerando and the forte just right to allow a fortissimo.
001account 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dislike his coda. It lacks passion and fire, which someone like richter does so well.
bicsc7 3 years ago
This interpretation is first-rate. But, you know-most pianists play the last 4 chords completely out of rhythm. If you count in 6 (counting 8ths) the last 4 chords should be longer. I don't know why everyone seems to do that-even some of the greats!
Grigor99 3 years ago 3
I don't think that really matters. They just try to make them climactic. Personally, I like them to be fairly brisk, but others like to drag them out.
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago 2
this guy just handled the business.
i like his interpretation of his 15th nocturne.
prestomoltoagitato 3 years ago 2
he's not horowitz but he plays this ballade better then any other pianist has tried.. ever.. i.m.o.
misotoma 3 years ago 15
yes, I never heard this ballade better played than him
lecheparavaka 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have you heard Pollini? He's wonderful.
K189T 3 years ago
@misotoma different piano/ surrounding creates a different sound .. i.m.o. but he stil has great talent in creating a good sound for this ballade
hohohee1 1 year ago
@misotoma No, he's actually much better than Horowitz in the f minor Ballade, and in much else of the Chopin and Liszt repertoire as well. I am a tremendous Horowitz fan, but Bolet is universally recognized as one of the greatest pianists of the 20th Century. To his students he stressed a strong but flexible rhythm, a warm, singing tone, broad (not overly fast) tempos and clear articulation even in the most rapid passages, all very much in evidence here. Not a bad way to play the piano.
MISHA1119 1 year ago
@MISHA1119 Richter was better than Bolet though
bobbphysics 1 year ago
Beautiful...
icyshandy 3 years ago
Woww!! 2:11, that's the most passionately I've ever heard anyone play that!! Orgasmic!!
TheTradge 3 years ago 3
Everything is beautiful besides 2.48 - 2.55. Generally perfect! just how i feel it. richter's interpretation is quite good too.
judyrosati 3 years ago
Rubato all over the pieces and at one's ease is obviously no taste and ruin of music, this performance is just the opposite, proper phrasing and rubato, full tone, you may say "his technique is........ " but abusolutely not on his interpretation
poisonalien 4 years ago
I don't have a problem with his technique or his interpretation.
mikejunior80 3 years ago
when talking 'bout rubato with "class" and taste, especially in Chopin's works, it's not about how he played in in "french salon" or how special you could make the piece become, it's about the all and the one! in a "phrase" or a passage, you pull/draw, and you retract, just like a elastic rubber band - while you pull it, some parts of this band is soft and lengthened, some parts are tightened. What to do to make it still a whole piece instead of snap it?
poisonalien 4 years ago
those who said that "a student sitting and practicing with a metronome" , might have no idea what's the difference between "generally keeping the tempo" , and "playing like machine/metronome"
do you have any idea of the elastic theory, or say "rubber band way" of playing Chopin's works???
poisonalien 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, I didn't realize hitler was such a great pianist!
CrabtasticBudgie 4 years ago
hahahahahhahahhah
redgress17 3 years ago
:D ...I can't stop laughing...
eriksatie9 3 years ago
looks like the sims
barelyapianist 4 years ago
Interesting to watch this great performance by another pianist capable of thinking outside of a box-these are always my favourites.Of course this Ballade presents unusual technical difficulties which increase as the work unfolds-and in a more concentrated way than in Chopin's most difficult work, the Allegro de Concert Op.46-which hardly anyone plays nowadays for some obscure reason.Many thanks,Sissco.
ric55 4 years ago
Each in their own way is very difficult. I would say in total, I find the 4th ballade the hardest to play well - its coda being the biggest challenge of them all. The third ballade is more difficult than most people imagine partly because it is so mellow and seemingly laidback. The coda of the second ballade is also very difficult to pull off well.
zhangensprachen 4 years ago
well said, the 1st ballade -> good technique, 2nd -> speed & strength, 3rd -> strength & stamina, 4th -> EVERYTHING!
ThunderJacky 4 years ago
this comment makes no sense to me.. how can u try to bundle up the ballades in their own corners by rank of difficulty?? thats so silly. maybe u need to play all 4 of them.. then u can say something meaningful. (to see what i mean look Berezovsky ballade no. 2 F minor)
misotoma 4 years ago
I think the pedaling in the A-flat Ballade is quite tricky...the only Chopin piece I have found with more difficult pedaling is the Barcarolle, Op. 60. A whole book could be written about pedaling in Chopin. What's even better is to find a really good teacher who can teach it...though somebody once wrote flatly that pedaling cannot be taught. I frankly think a good ear and good listening are the requirements for good pedaling.
soami2u 3 years ago 3
Which ballad is the hardest and easiest if the Chopin Ballads?
NeoComposer 4 years ago
The 11th Ballade in F-Double Sharp Quadruple minor, Op.93b is the most difficult in my opinion. His Ballade No.6 in C-Triple Flat major, Op.-47 is the easiest I think.
Good luck finding those sheets! They are more difficult to find than learning the pieces. hehe
ivrykeys 4 years ago
Thanks for fake sheets!!!!!!!
NeoComposer 4 years ago
lol he plays like me! Only my teacher yells at me for hunching over my hands like that : )
I think my favorite performance of this is Horowitz. But if you see the video of Richter playing the coda, he's awesome too!
Kachukeland 4 years ago
amazing! maybe even better than Zimerman's interpretation! just unbelievable, truely amazing!
JaapHH 4 years ago
Well, emphasizing the last four notes was initiated by Cortot, but Bolet's effect is much better.
buprup 4 years ago
That is an outstanding performace, no doubt. But there is two words I have to mention, Elena Kuschnerova.
antoinedelacroix 4 years ago
haha the way he plays those last notes at the end its like some kid smacking a keyboard...fucking briliant playing!
barelyapianist 4 years ago 2
Playing for a year i have mastered Bachs Minuet in G minor but his playing this seems like i blow...
Tassadar11 4 years ago
The accustics is awesome!
Tlllllllllllllll 4 years ago
The last four notes of the bar just before the four last big chords are absolute magic (at 4:28)!! Although certainly not the way Chopin wrote or intended them to be played, they are so original to Maestro Bolet and the most exciting ending to this masterpiece I've ever heard any pianist perform! This guy is my new favorite artist! I'm sorry he's long gone now and I never got to see him live.
jjp009 4 years ago
I personally enjoyed this interpretation more than Rubinstein's 1959 recording(which i absolutely adore). So focussed, so exploratory, so fluid, and sure. This is, in my opinion, where musicians should be going with their music, not faking orgasms with their facial expressions and hoping that all that wasted energy will positively translate to their music. Beautiful, artistic playing.
ProkofievRules 4 years ago
Hey I just noticed that too. It's horrific that one has to watch a musician's facial expressions
markma5511 4 years ago
I just think it looks fucking stupid and takes away from the music. A bit of a smirk here and there is just fine, and so is showing-off, and doing controversial things like telling Leonard Bernstein to take a hike(like Glenn Gould did), but after a while, it gets to be really fucking stupid, all of it.
ProkofievRules 4 years ago
Wow! I wish you could do slow motion on YouTube, because watching this guy's fingers is like watching a thoroughbred racehorse running! Superb. And true, no facial expressions, no wild body movements, nothing to distract from his art and the composer's intentions! First class. Is Bolet still alive?
jjp009 4 years ago
yeah its kinda like Horowitz.. this guy does kill the ending theme of this Ballade.. unlike Zimerman where he throws off alot of flare.. but still.. i have to say that bits and pieces from Bolet/Zimerman interpretations' would make an amazing ballade. Especially Bolets final 2 mins.
misotoma 4 years ago
Yeah your right. He is amazing the way he plays, and handles the piece. I would have loved to see him play Chopin's Nocturnes, from hearing on what Sissco has he is a great interpreter on at least those 2 he has recorded. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this guy is really different.
misotoma 4 years ago
I like Zimermans energy.
rachman1noff 5 years ago
I prefer Yundi Li
vinimorgado 5 years ago
I can't decide who's performance of this peice is better, Bolet's or Zimmerman's. I like Zimmerman's coda better than Bolet's, but Bolet's left-hand arpegios are more exciting. Plus, I think Zimmerman is in love with himself... heh heh... overall, if I could play as well as either of them, I'd be happy!
The End.
Kachukeland 5 years ago
p.s. Vladimir Horowitz played this peice better than both Bolet and Zimerman, so Horowitz wins! :)
Kachukeland 5 years ago
um, Horowitz's performance of this piece was the most whacked thing I had ever heard him play. I think there's a reason he withdrew that recording shortly after its release. I could hardly believe my ears..
retrogamerdave 4 years ago
I agree, I know which recording you're refering to, but I have an album where Horowitz plays it phoenominally. Especially his coda.
Have you heard Ingrid Fliter? She plays this piece also, and her coda is as good as, if not better than, Horowitz's coda.
Kachukeland 4 years ago
regrettably i have not heard that recording, do you have a posting like on rogepost or something? I'd be very interesting in hearing this.
ProkofievRules 4 years ago
I recommend the Novaes recording (late 1960s, at the end of her career). It has such sweep and nobility. I wouldn't say it's better than the Bolet performance here, but it's one of my favorites. I'd take it over Horowitz, Rubinstein or any of the younger pianists of today.
soami2u 3 years ago
Bravo! That was FABULOUS!
retrogamerdave 5 years ago
ditto d9's remarks! and rejanemaga's.
eligarf 5 years ago
this is a great performance.
davidf996 5 years ago
add your videos to TURBOUPLOAD. I want this video please.
mangore1 5 years ago
Thanks for posting.
rejanemaga 5 years ago
It seems that everyone who only hits the right keys is better than this.
dgaranin 5 years ago
No, he isn't...
soxwox 5 years ago
Zimerman is better...
aaabbbccc5 5 years ago