The Case for a Creator 11of11 Critical analysis by ExtantDodo

[hola4adola]

religious ppl are fucked

[clawedification]

2010 scientist make synthetic life,what does this mean?HAHAHA evolution heads this only shows and proves that it takes intelligence to make life.Whoever made this is obviously misinformed about the subject.We dont OBSERVE spontaneous generation because it doesn't happen.Are you willingly ignorant to these facts?Is there any proof behind these objections?Do you know how to make a frog from primordial soup?Can you show me someone who has?Why did the soup turn to water?Well i guess your flattened.

[Reasonwillwin]

@clawedification You're not helping your side by being so freakingly ignorant.

[clawedification]

@Reasonwillwin Well I guess you dont approve of the questions?

[fifikip090]

The entire time, the video just proclaims "error here" and "error there." These errors are not explained in any way, only pointed out. And he says Intelligent Design is based on logical fallacies, dishonesty, and a lack of biological knowledge. Obviously, had he been knowledgeable enough to explain why their statements are so erroneous, he would have included his reasoning in the video, instead of mocking the theory of Intelligent Design by comparing it to a cartoon

[fifikip090]

@fifikip090 stating science makes no comment on the supernatural.

[flotopo]

SupportExtantDodo,

Being condescending by using all those inserted ironical remarks, does not make you right neither does it show your "objectivity" on the matter. ALL the remarks you've made can be addressed to many aspects of science, yet you do not have a mocking attitude towards the "other parallel universes" theory, which by the way is only a theory with no supporting data , to name but one. What your attitude shows, is you are not in search of the truth, but of a reputation. So pitiful...

[Bam12594]

Im still not even close to done with proving the faultiness of Biological Evolution/ Darwanism. I believe the majority of scientists out there are smart people believing false lies told to them by text books that have never been publically announced as lies or false data. Still today, textbooks use the Miller Experiment, Haeckels Embryos, and other fake theories in educating children. Both of these drawings/experiments have been proven to be doctored or just wrong. Why are they taught,

[adolthitler]

@Bam12594 The Urey - Miller experiment has been improved upon. Haeckels embryos are debunked, by scientists not creationists. Its a lie that scientists believe in Haeckels embryos.

Haeckels embryos are not taught except as an example of fraud, as fraudulent as your religion by the way. Why do you want to teach people your fraud?

[Bam12594]

What i just posted doesn't even crack the ice on the lies told about evolution/neodarwanism. If you believe science is based on evidence, which it most certainly isn't for infact its based on explanations, then you have proven darwanism wrong before you even start to explain yourself. If you believed that science was based on proven facts, then you wouldn't believe that running in the rain keeps u drying than walking in the rain. Whatever hasnt been proven is a lie to you.

[Bam12594]

So you atheists/ darwanists/ agnostics believe that science has proven evolution.. Obviously thats an even blinder leap of faith than christianity. Darwin has written that if fossil records didn't back up his theory, then everything he had once believed would fall apart. The Miller experiment has also been proved to be false. He used the wrong mixture of the believed ancient atmosphere. Even when they tested it with what is believed now the only materials produced were formaldehyde and cyanide.

[Iceream1]

@DanielThomasVideos idk if u read the holy bible cus my bible sayd the Earth is round and that was written thousands of years before when scientists thought the earth was being carried on a turtle s back its funny cause science confirms the bible the bible dont confirm science check out isaiah ch40 verse 22 and job 26:7 says how the Earth hangs on nothing

[MrInfadel]

Thumbs up if you recognise this as ad hoc reasoning.

For example:

I" can't explain the gravitational constant forming galaxy structure, because I'm a pre-medevil shepherd with no knowledge above sheep herding, so god did it.

[maddogdelta]

Strobel keeps yapping about science...but if he was that interested in science, why did he get degrees in journalism and law? Was it because he wasn't smart enough to figure out the science?

[rodanosamehr]

Nicely done but would have been more powerful with an actual voice in lieu of text--perhaps both would have filled the dead space but good work nonetheless.

[DanielThomasVideos]

Yea even if there was evidence to suggest there was a creator, Why would that creator be the God from the Bible that sais illness is demons and the Earth is flat.lol ?

[jackferwerda]

what bothers me is this: Even if one found evidence that there was some type of creator (which nobody has) One still lacks the ability to say anything meaningful about who that creator is and what plans he has for us. Does God love us? Is God cruel or kind? It is absolutely useless.

[MrCameron34]

things could pop in and out of excistance and quatum physics of chance would cause matter to be created and destroyed for no apparent reason the fact that our univers follows laws and has a very ordered design points to a creator scientist and even yes these dumbasses have no explaination for why the universe follows these laws OH it just does that is not rationall if there are laws there has to be be a law enforcer mathmatics is gods language

[JamesMorlan]

It points to a creator only because you want it to. You can postulate it as a theory, but I'd be interested to know how you would test it.

[MrCameron34]

Who ever made this video has only a one track mind before the existance of space time the creation of the atom was essential to the big bang the fact that our universe contains laxs like gravity and the expansion with dark matter should be proof of a god scientist agree the set order and the fact that the universe follows mathmatics to a tee is bafeling some one had to make these laws some thing had to use math to create it it is easy to imagine a disordered universe wer no laws are present

[JamesMorlan]

How does that offer proof of the existence of a god of any kind? How do you know for sure that this universe was created? What if it has always been here? Not possible, you say? Then explain for me how you would describe non-existence. Sounds like it might be easy, but give it a try. We no more have proof of a god than we do of a flying spaghetti monster. I'm not saying there is no god, but we just don't have any definitive proof. Your suppositions are just that - suppositions.

[MrCameron34]

oh and how does evolution cancel out god both could exist

[Bam12594]

@MrCameron34 Read up on the Cambrian Explosion. It will explain how they dont co-exist, its either creationism or darwanism.

[MrCameron34]

i find it this highly arrogant no mortal could ever no the deep awnsers to life i dont know if there is a god but i dont have an ego big enough to claim to have it all figured out if you claim you know there is no god you are an idiot whos thinking will never be on an elevated level einstein is alot smarter than you people and he believed in a higher power

[seiferganon]

It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. --Albert Einstein

[artstart2010]

In a few years, this guy will have his own religion or religious offshoot. Like Elijah Muhammed in the U.S. for example, he has developed a new niche for people who are not totally comfortable with the classic views in religion. I believe there are probably enough people out there who love science and still need very desperately to put their trust into something else. YKWIS

[RadarKat73080]

Ugh! Faith is a lack of evidence Einstein! Read Hebrews 11:1 for the best definition of "faith" I have ever found. You don't wake up in the morning, put your foot off your bed with "faith" that the floor didn't move in the night!

[TheHonestTheist]

/watch?v=fFH0khjgA0U

[semajws]

I find it amusing that you seem to think that your sarcastic bashing of a well-made documentary is in some way a 'critical analysis.'

[citizenschallenge]

Excellent Job!

I read Strobbel's book a while back and was endlessly irritated by his intellectual dishonesty and rhetorical tricks.

Thank you, for taking the time to tear into his fallacious arguments.

[johnycannuk]

What if that "Creator" is Baal? Or Vishnu? Or Slartybardfarst?

These guys are real idiots.

Great job ExtantDodo keep it up

[websnarf]

"Made by Tim. Inspector #4" Lol. :)

[tony45261]

Absolutely brilliant!

Earlier today I stumbled onto a VenomFangX rant that I was surprised to see had only positive comments. I was even more surprised when I couldnt post my own comment pointing out the glaring flaws in his crazy argument. In trying to work out what was going on I ended up here and am just starting to get my head around all this DMCA stuff and what looks suspiciously like a blatant suppression of free speech.

Anyway, thank you so much for reposting ExtantDodos stuff.

[Gwaithmir]

To date, this was the most exhaustive refutation of creationist BS I've seen on YouTube. Fine job. Favorited!