you get bullied in senior high school, beaten up by other douches, have your money taken and your lunch thrown to the floor, UNTIL one day you drive to school in one of those. better yet arrive late and um "hide" it around a corner when no one is watching. during recess mock all bullies into chasing you. when they arrive in the corner they will come face to face with THIS. you take aim(after you have started the engine) and fire a blank. yep they soiled their pants. now slowly drive towards them
@egoleech to answer your question the panther was a tank and had a high velocity 75mm
cannon it had a rotating turret. the jagdpanther was a tank destroyer it had a 88mm cannon the same one on the king tiger. it had more armor then the panther and was ment to kill tanks and the panther was made first on 1942 on hitlers birthday it was his present from his commanders the jagdpanther was made in 1944
@egoleech "jagdpanther" means hunting panther. These are tank destroyers that could fit the larger bore L71 88mm cannon, where as the regular panther (because of the turret) fit only the 76mm (which was still a great gun).
hmmmmm dear santa all i want for christmas is a 101,200ib piece of metal formed into a jagdpanther one maybach engine and one 88mm gun and one mg 34 and som e30 88 mm rounds
@0Turbox Yes, they can pivot turn.. but usually do not, due to the extra stress put on the final drive, issues with the drive were never completely sorted out so its safer to use the 1st gear steering radius and apply the inside track brake to tighten the turn.
@panzerwolf494 Good point, thats very true.. it used a "slack track" suspension system and could throw the track if a pivot turn was made too fast or was clogged up with mud and snow. It still had much better mobility on soft ground than the M4 Sherman. thanks for the reply
@1ownjoo2 Sticky bombs generally failed to work as intended and were often more dangerous to the user than its intended target.. but they sure make for great heroic scenes in Hollywood movies. They were ineffective against tanks for two reasons, they usually lacked enough explosive charge to effect the post '42 designs and second most importantly they often failed to "stick" especially to a moving tank.
@mattmatt115 Yes, the Soviets did use Diesel power for its medium and heavy tanks during WW2, lighter tanks used petrol. Most armoured vehicles still used petrol until the 1960s when Diesel really took over.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Wilmot08 Modern tanks do. The FT-17 was the 1st tank to have a fully rotating turret, and is regarded as perhaps being the most influential tank ever made. Zaloga said that it was the world's 1st modern tank.
@PkayerZxz2 What about WW1 tanks? most of them don't have turrets. What about tank destroyers that do have turrets? the term 'tank' is used more generally these days for any armoured vehicle, the differences in armoured vehicle types gets too complicated for most. Yes, the Jagdpanther is a tank destroyer, an excellent one and could perform well against turreted tanks in most terrains.
@PkayerZxz2 You missed the point completely.. armoured vehicles are no longer defined by having a turret or not.. it means nothing these days. There are "modern tanks" that have no turret at all (eg; Stridsvagn 103) and many armoured vehicles that have turrets are NOT TANKS such as Armoured Personnel Carriers and Infantry Fighting Vehicles.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@doktorbimmer Whether a vehicle has a turret or not doesn't necessarily make it a tank, but modern tanks DO have turrets. I don't care about the Stridsvagn 103, the Swedes don't know shit about war, they can call it a tank if they want to, it's not.
@PkayerZxz2 Thats not what you said before, you said; "tanks have turrets," This is what you wrote in your first comment.. PkayerZxz2 Said: "It's not a tank, it's a tank destroyer. Tanks have turrets, while most TDs of WWII did not." Well, last time I checked the Stridsvagn 103 was still a tank.. the Swedes call it a tank... NATO called it a tank... even the Soviets called it a tank... but your free to call it whatever you want...
this was one of the best tanks of WWII. It could reach speeds of up to 34.2 miles per hour (55 km/h) which doesn't sound like much, but for the tanks of the time, It was truly a fast vehicle. It also had a very formidable 88 mm gun. Jagdpanther means "hunter panther" in German. And lets just say it didn't earn the name by luck.
@RoyalCompassVideos Very noisy though don't you think? And not to mention the 80 mm worth of sloped armour makes it all but near invulnerable to its opponents given the Jagdpanther had an excellent power-weight ratio which it took advantage of the Panther's gear but had an improved transmission :D
@SuperDarkSamurai1 Not Porsche.. Maybach engines (pronounced My-BahK), Jagdpather and most other panzers were powered Maybachs very compact, lightweight and powerful series of gasoline V-12. the HL230 motor produced a max. 700hp & appox.1400 ft.lbs. torque Maybach-Motorenbau GmbH is better known for its luxury automobiles and powering the Zepplin airships. Now a div.of Daimler-Benz, its products also sold under the name MTU Friedrichshafen and Freightliner trucks.
@SuperDarkSamurai1 Porsche only produced tank engines for the Ferdinand/Elephant and a handful of prototype vehicles, they were designed and built in conjunction with Deutz (MWM). Jagdpanther engines were all built by Maybach at its own Friedrichshaven plant for producing HL230 series engines. Porsche was not a major production source, it was primarily a design firm before and during the war with much of Porsche products built by sub-contractors.
@doktorbimmer Most of Porsche's designs were built at the Nibelungenwerke in Austria. The Elefant/Ferdinand used Maybach HL-120 engines. The Porsche engines as envisioned for the VK-4501(P) were electro-diesel engines, but Germany had insufficent supplies of Tungsten for them.
@HerbertAckermans Yes, the Porsche/Duetz drivetrain was the original design, the already available HL120 engines were used when the remaining uncompleted Porsche Tigers were converted to Tank Destroyers. No further vehicles were produced, Hitler actually cancelled the Porsche drive system because of the large amounts of Copper that would be needed to produce them. Tungsten is not used in conventional piston engines or electric motors
Think of the soldiers in shit to their hips, tired, hungry, thirsty, cold, dirty and their bodies are hurting allover. No heavy weapons and suddenly they hear this sound coming closer..... The more I experience equipment from the war the more respect I get for the men who went through hell. We who are young today will never understand what these men went through.
@byf43 Well said and you know I don't know what i would prefer if i had to choose between being an infantryman or trapped in a tank - just the thought of being trapped there and the tank had been hit. Same goes for all men of all nations who fought on sea, land and air - for those people directly involved there is absolutely no escape from the realities of war.
@coveneyr Recently I had a taste of it when I got to "play" with a Leopard 1 tank. Post war, but still you get a taste of the cramped and hard interior. For sure I wouldn't want to be inside such a machine in troubled times. Later the crew took the tank for a ride at a track where I stood about 2 meters from the tank when it passed by and turned and accelerated away. I could feel the ground vibrate underneath my feet and the roar of the engine rumbling in my ribcage. If for real it'd be hell.
@byf43 What an amazing experience. In battle situations it must have been hell - I still wonder how someone can fight day in day out for years and come through it - well your body may but maybe your soul stays behind. War must change people so much. Best wishes to you.
@coveneyr Yes it must have been hell during the war. Think of the poor soldiers on the eastern front with too little weapons & ammo, heavily outnumbered. They had to take out T34's using "geballte Ladung's" & Hohlhaftladungs. They must have had nerves of steel O_O Sometimes when everyday stuff annoys me I think of the poor men who fought in WWII and suddenly my problems seem insignificant.
I have seen this Jagdpanther in action a few years ago, because i live in Koblenz. In the "Night of the Museum" a few weeks after the WTS got it from the restauration. In this night, they showed all the vehicles that are able to drive. This is the most powerful and wonderful engine sound i've ever heard. Almost tears in my eyes...;-)
Cant wait for the day when it is socially and legally accepted that tanks can be driven on the street and a viable alternative mode of transport just like cars :P
The first political party to espouse the idea will have my full support! lol
Wow, I can just imagine a poor Sherman crew watching from where the cameraman is located......... guess they would cut out and run for their lives, as their cannon was no match to the 88mm gun. Most impressive.
Read about a subject before asking questions or making a statement that is bonkers.
The reason for producing an assault gun it that without the turret one could place more armour, a bigger gun, lower the costs and produce more of them compared to a turretted version of it.
In the case of the jagdpanther this was a monstrous 8.8cm L71 compared to the Panther 7.5cm L70.
It was also not inaccurate, really that is a strange thing to say, it had the same optics as normal german tanks.
German optics were of high quality, when this was coupled to a weapon like the 8.8cm L71 led to 85% chance of hitting the target at 1000m.
The sheer power of this gun also allowed to take down a sherman at a distance of well over 2000m.
The jagdpanther still had 13 degree traverse to both left and right with it's main gun, allowing it to make changes without the need to move as long as the target remained in this field, even easier when it was firing at long range.
zhis is the sexiest video on youtube
magnvsmarcvs 4 days ago
you get bullied in senior high school, beaten up by other douches, have your money taken and your lunch thrown to the floor, UNTIL one day you drive to school in one of those. better yet arrive late and um "hide" it around a corner when no one is watching. during recess mock all bullies into chasing you. when they arrive in the corner they will come face to face with THIS. you take aim(after you have started the engine) and fire a blank. yep they soiled their pants. now slowly drive towards them
routhoula 5 days ago
Germans. Are. Fucking. Awesome.
xCh34pShOtx 2 weeks ago 4
question : why is there a regular panther and a jagdpanther. They have the same gun , right?
So why have these two different versions?
Is it because the slanted front and sides of the jagdpanther helps deflecting shells? Then why is there a regular Panther in the first place? ^^
egoleech 3 weeks ago
@egoleech to answer your question the panther was a tank and had a high velocity 75mm
cannon it had a rotating turret. the jagdpanther was a tank destroyer it had a 88mm cannon the same one on the king tiger. it had more armor then the panther and was ment to kill tanks and the panther was made first on 1942 on hitlers birthday it was his present from his commanders the jagdpanther was made in 1944
frostymoss1 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frostymoss1 The 88mm gun in the Jagdpanther is too large to fit practically in the Panther turret.
Without a turret the Jagdpanther had more room for a larger gun and was capable of carrying more frontal armour too.
They did built some Panthers with a new larger turret for the Panther Ausf. F that was similar to the King Tiger and was fitted with the 88mm gun.
doktorbimmer 3 weeks ago
@egoleech The 88mm gun in the Jagdpanther is too large to fit practically in the Panther turret.
Without a turret the Jagdpanther had more room for a larger gun and was capable of carrying more frontal armour too.
They did built some Panthers with a new larger turret for the Panther Ausf. F that was similar to the King Tiger and was fitted with the 88mm gun.
doktorbimmer 3 weeks ago
@egoleech "jagdpanther" means hunting panther. These are tank destroyers that could fit the larger bore L71 88mm cannon, where as the regular panther (because of the turret) fit only the 76mm (which was still a great gun).
jangotrooper 2 weeks ago
@jangotrooper
75mm, actually but yeah, the kwk 42 75mm l/70 still was a great gun.
sk1llblack 2 weeks ago
Awesome machine :P
krejslayer 3 weeks ago 2
WWII German AFVs kick some major ass!
Chriskkboongg 1 month ago 2
My favorite self propelled gun in WW2.
Vinger55 1 month ago 5
Tank porn
Mar1Popp1ns 1 month ago
fap fap fap fap
erloriel 1 month ago
thanks for NOT adding music to this
SilasHand 1 month ago 3
No Excuse NOT to use correct period Tanks in Films now !!!!, thats one lovely resto...
mark24875218 2 months ago
Man!!!! Thats fucking awesome!!!
dastotalebroetchen 3 months ago 5
What a machine! and what a nasty bite that 88mm has
ToonandBBfan 3 months ago 6
damn maybach you scary
Fred5612 3 months ago 5
They made some BEAUTIFUL stuff
Rangerfull3 3 months ago 3
is this the one from band of brothers
canadiandrumer 3 months ago
@canadiandrumer I think that was a STuG III
Rangerfull3 3 months ago
@Rangerfull3 yea there was a StuG but there also was a Jagdpanther supporting the fallshirmjager that retreated with them
canadiandrumer 3 months ago
@canadiandrumer O right, it's been so long since i've seen the series i forgot the other tank lawl
Rangerfull3 3 months ago
does anybody know if this tank has a foot throttle or a hand throttle.
drod103164 3 months ago
@drod103164 I believe it has a foot throttle
doktorbimmer 3 months ago
Ich mag die MUAs besser, weil die Jagdpanther ist ok in allen außer der Fachhochschule Münster war wie sup wenig bro und er war wie ahh!
playPS3play 3 months ago
sexy tank
TheR1ko 3 months ago 3
i love this engine sound ~!
taichin22 3 months ago 7
awsome engine sound...
pivovinorakija 3 months ago 8
пацаны бросайте танки!смотрите порнуху
HITMAN8383 3 months ago
hmmmmm dear santa all i want for christmas is a 101,200ib piece of metal formed into a jagdpanther one maybach engine and one 88mm gun and one mg 34 and som e30 88 mm rounds
Blueatchley12 4 months ago 5
Pssstttt!!!!!!!!!!!! quiet guys........JAgdpather coming!! That's one scary experience
bammb00 4 months ago 3
I thought, the JPanther could use both tracks for turning, one forward, the other one back wards for faster turn speed.
0Turbox 4 months ago
@0Turbox Yes, they can pivot turn.. but usually do not, due to the extra stress put on the final drive, issues with the drive were never completely sorted out so its safer to use the 1st gear steering radius and apply the inside track brake to tighten the turn.
doktorbimmer 4 months ago
@doktorbimmer Not to mention the higher chance of throwing a track when pivot turning, thus rendering your tank immobile
panzerwolf494 4 months ago
@panzerwolf494 Good point, thats very true.. it used a "slack track" suspension system and could throw the track if a pivot turn was made too fast or was clogged up with mud and snow. It still had much better mobility on soft ground than the M4 Sherman. thanks for the reply
doktorbimmer 4 months ago
Вот это выхлоппппп моща!!!!! Спорткары отдыхают)))))))
paxandeath 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HHHHHHAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLTTTTTTTTTT!
Vot?
SHYTENHAUSEN!
Driver, turn ze Panzer around. Ze dumbkopf loader forgot ze AP roundz.
Gotten himmel!
noozilander 4 months ago
Ya know, to me, Jagdpanthers have always looked like the sports car of the battlefield...and this clip does nothing but reinforce that feeling
panzerwolf494 4 months ago 18
Comment removed
doktorbimmer 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
doktorbimmer 4 months ago
Hot damn one badass engine sound!!
xStalkerxx 4 months ago 22
I'm sure Tom Hanks could knock this out with his 'sticky bombs'. My Ass!
Neovator69 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Neovator69
It was knocked out, the treads were destroyed and im sure the stick bomb could take the treads out on this
1ownjoo2 4 months ago
@1ownjoo2 Sticky bombs generally failed to work as intended and were often more dangerous to the user than its intended target.. but they sure make for great heroic scenes in Hollywood movies. They were ineffective against tanks for two reasons, they usually lacked enough explosive charge to effect the post '42 designs and second most importantly they often failed to "stick" especially to a moving tank.
doktorbimmer 4 months ago 2
@doktorbimmer
Good to know
1ownjoo2 4 months ago
Coolest vid on youtube... hands down
doktorbimmer 4 months ago 9
Here's your sticky bomb son go put it on the that tank, F*#k off you go put it on there. I'm out of here, brave men indeed....
hairychinfinn 5 months ago
what a sexy ass :D
vollorix 5 months ago 9
Great looking footage.
shatchett0 5 months ago 9
top speed?
berkut2006 5 months ago
@berkut2006 Same as an M4 Sherman, about 48km/h (30mph)
doktorbimmer 5 months ago
Petrol engine?
mattmatt115 6 months ago
@mattmatt115 Yes, 700hp V-12 Maybach(MTU) petrol engine. most all WW2 tanks were petrol fueled.
doktorbimmer 6 months ago 3
@doktorbimmer Weren't Soviet WW2 tanks diesel powered?
mattmatt115 6 months ago
@mattmatt115 Yes, the Soviets did use Diesel power for its medium and heavy tanks during WW2, lighter tanks used petrol. Most armoured vehicles still used petrol until the 1960s when Diesel really took over.
doktorbimmer 5 months ago
0:34 Just imagine you got spotted. Next second, your dead
Povilas7 6 months ago 2
so sweet .. what a tank soo freakin cool
Marko3123 6 months ago 5
@Marko3123 It's not a tank, it's a tank destroyer. Tanks have turrets, while most TDs of WWII did not.
PkayerZxz2 6 months ago
@PkayerZxz2 so the "Tanks" of WWI arent tanks because they dont have turrets?
Wilmot08 6 months ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Wilmot08 Modern tanks do. The FT-17 was the 1st tank to have a fully rotating turret, and is regarded as perhaps being the most influential tank ever made. Zaloga said that it was the world's 1st modern tank.
PkayerZxz2 6 months ago
@PkayerZxz2 What about WW1 tanks? most of them don't have turrets. What about tank destroyers that do have turrets? the term 'tank' is used more generally these days for any armoured vehicle, the differences in armoured vehicle types gets too complicated for most. Yes, the Jagdpanther is a tank destroyer, an excellent one and could perform well against turreted tanks in most terrains.
doktorbimmer 6 months ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@doktorbimmer See my post below. Modern tanks have turrets, and while some TDs did have turrets, they were open turrets, not closed ones.
PkayerZxz2 6 months ago
@PkayerZxz2 You missed the point completely.. armoured vehicles are no longer defined by having a turret or not.. it means nothing these days. There are "modern tanks" that have no turret at all (eg; Stridsvagn 103) and many armoured vehicles that have turrets are NOT TANKS such as Armoured Personnel Carriers and Infantry Fighting Vehicles.
doktorbimmer 6 months ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@doktorbimmer Whether a vehicle has a turret or not doesn't necessarily make it a tank, but modern tanks DO have turrets. I don't care about the Stridsvagn 103, the Swedes don't know shit about war, they can call it a tank if they want to, it's not.
PkayerZxz2 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PkayerZxz2 Thats not what you said before, you said; "tanks have turrets," This is what you wrote in your first comment.. PkayerZxz2 Said: "It's not a tank, it's a tank destroyer. Tanks have turrets, while most TDs of WWII did not." Well, last time I checked the Stridsvagn 103 was still a tank.. the Swedes call it a tank... NATO called it a tank... even the Soviets called it a tank... but your free to call it whatever you want...
doktorbimmer 6 months ago 8
the Luger of tanks...
7Starslayer7 6 months ago
this was one of the best tanks of WWII. It could reach speeds of up to 34.2 miles per hour (55 km/h) which doesn't sound like much, but for the tanks of the time, It was truly a fast vehicle. It also had a very formidable 88 mm gun. Jagdpanther means "hunter panther" in German. And lets just say it didn't earn the name by luck.
RoyalCompassVideos 6 months ago 12
@RoyalCompassVideos
It "earned" it's name by being a tank destroyer (or hunter tank/Jagd Panzer in german) based on the Panther chassis.
Suyamu 6 months ago 2
@RoyalCompassVideos Very noisy though don't you think? And not to mention the 80 mm worth of sloped armour makes it all but near invulnerable to its opponents given the Jagdpanther had an excellent power-weight ratio which it took advantage of the Panther's gear but had an improved transmission :D
HeirofGojira91 6 months ago
@kristopheraugust If you actually mean that - it is I that is impressed about lack of knowledge. Otherwise i apologize.
matt47110815 6 months ago
Ist das nicht Ute?
RingoGefahr 6 months ago
That`s one sweet running Maybach. That`s what I call music, nothing sounds like V12`s do.
DoubleVisionandco 6 months ago 26
Sound = win!
Cougar545x39 6 months ago 4
If you saw this coming towards you, you pretty much knew you were "F--King finished".
Lockbar 7 months ago 6
Wow - impressive!
catman13ger 7 months ago
i like the drag race maneuver at 0:53
jonobonnowonno1 7 months ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My Grandpa was a gunner in WW2 and he said he took one of these out with the M36's 90mm gun.
adobo777 7 months ago
@adobo777 Wow, your grandpa sure was lucky! not many allied armored crews survived an encounter with a Jadgpanther.
doktorbimmer 7 months ago 32
ISNT this a tank used in WW2
xCrEMeYlVlOlVST3R 7 months ago
@xCrEMeYlVlOlVST3R Yes
matt47110815 6 months ago
GIVES ME GOOSEBUMPS
xCrEMeYlVlOlVST3R 7 months ago
the beauty of krupp steel and porsche engines
SuperDarkSamurai1 7 months ago
@SuperDarkSamurai1 Not Porsche.. Maybach engines (pronounced My-BahK), Jagdpather and most other panzers were powered Maybachs very compact, lightweight and powerful series of gasoline V-12. the HL230 motor produced a max. 700hp & appox.1400 ft.lbs. torque Maybach-Motorenbau GmbH is better known for its luxury automobiles and powering the Zepplin airships. Now a div.of Daimler-Benz, its products also sold under the name MTU Friedrichshafen and Freightliner trucks.
doktorbimmer 7 months ago 45
@doktorbimmer
yeah, but porsche produced and made the maybach engines
SuperDarkSamurai1 6 months ago
@SuperDarkSamurai1 Porsche only produced tank engines for the Ferdinand/Elephant and a handful of prototype vehicles, they were designed and built in conjunction with Deutz (MWM). Jagdpanther engines were all built by Maybach at its own Friedrichshaven plant for producing HL230 series engines. Porsche was not a major production source, it was primarily a design firm before and during the war with much of Porsche products built by sub-contractors.
doktorbimmer 6 months ago 27
@doktorbimmer Most of Porsche's designs were built at the Nibelungenwerke in Austria. The Elefant/Ferdinand used Maybach HL-120 engines. The Porsche engines as envisioned for the VK-4501(P) were electro-diesel engines, but Germany had insufficent supplies of Tungsten for them.
HerbertAckermans 2 months ago
@HerbertAckermans Yes, the Porsche/Duetz drivetrain was the original design, the already available HL120 engines were used when the remaining uncompleted Porsche Tigers were converted to Tank Destroyers. No further vehicles were produced, Hitler actually cancelled the Porsche drive system because of the large amounts of Copper that would be needed to produce them. Tungsten is not used in conventional piston engines or electric motors
doktorbimmer 2 months ago 7
sorry, but.... DEAR SANTA!!!!
maltej1982 7 months ago
Think of the soldiers in shit to their hips, tired, hungry, thirsty, cold, dirty and their bodies are hurting allover. No heavy weapons and suddenly they hear this sound coming closer..... The more I experience equipment from the war the more respect I get for the men who went through hell. We who are young today will never understand what these men went through.
byf43 8 months ago 4
@byf43 Well said and you know I don't know what i would prefer if i had to choose between being an infantryman or trapped in a tank - just the thought of being trapped there and the tank had been hit. Same goes for all men of all nations who fought on sea, land and air - for those people directly involved there is absolutely no escape from the realities of war.
coveneyr 6 months ago
@coveneyr Recently I had a taste of it when I got to "play" with a Leopard 1 tank. Post war, but still you get a taste of the cramped and hard interior. For sure I wouldn't want to be inside such a machine in troubled times. Later the crew took the tank for a ride at a track where I stood about 2 meters from the tank when it passed by and turned and accelerated away. I could feel the ground vibrate underneath my feet and the roar of the engine rumbling in my ribcage. If for real it'd be hell.
byf43 6 months ago
@byf43 What an amazing experience. In battle situations it must have been hell - I still wonder how someone can fight day in day out for years and come through it - well your body may but maybe your soul stays behind. War must change people so much. Best wishes to you.
coveneyr 6 months ago
@coveneyr Yes it must have been hell during the war. Think of the poor soldiers on the eastern front with too little weapons & ammo, heavily outnumbered. They had to take out T34's using "geballte Ladung's" & Hohlhaftladungs. They must have had nerves of steel O_O Sometimes when everyday stuff annoys me I think of the poor men who fought in WWII and suddenly my problems seem insignificant.
byf43 6 months ago
When it came to coolness, the Germans won hands down.....
The sound of that tank turning around, made me shiver.
noozilander 8 months ago 20
@noozilander so it did in 1944
Shchetchynianin 7 months ago
1st gear, high RPMs = serious boner
WashingtonXJ 8 months ago 3
when some thing like this drives straight at me, i would loose my mind just figuring out how to dodge its awsomeness.
rboss0 8 months ago 15
exhaust flames 0:50
biftasi 8 months ago
Comment removed
WashingtonXJ 8 months ago
my grandpa is a tank colloector he has this in his collection
blueatchley 8 months ago
I love when it shows the back pipes humming when he revs down.
larsulrich3356 8 months ago 3
Wenn ich damals Russe gewesen wäre, wären meine Hosen jetzt voll^^
DanielaFetsch 8 months ago
Не перестаю преклоняться перед нашими дедами которые смогли свернуть шею могучей германской военной машине.
AKuzma333 8 months ago
Working like it left the factory yesterday! :)
z1mt 8 months ago 9
Amazing! It´s so detailed! Look, you can see the Zimmerit in the tank's walls)
VHL20 8 months ago
best video ever thanks
317eltoro 8 months ago
best video ever thanks
317eltoro 8 months ago 4
so beautifull...
1975gprf1 8 months ago 4
Absolut geiler Sound.....
kriegerhimmel 9 months ago 3
Sounds just like a Panther's engine! watch this watch?v=mOYkqGGq82Q
SSUstufRudel 9 months ago
Kinda dusty there at the end. :)
Aglarend 9 months ago
Engine sound is unbelievable !!!!
trimode11 9 months ago 6
still looks modern!
MrBlizZardWizZard 9 months ago 3
"penetration"
EightAlek 9 months ago
1 voter was run over by a Jagdpanther.
tommyzDad 9 months ago 8
Shoot it!
"FIRE!"
"ding"
"It bounced off!!"
Wolfenion 9 months ago
@Wolfenion
stop using auto-aim :P
blubbber 9 months ago
such a wonderful machine
ScoopzyDaizy 9 months ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GAY..FIGHT ME WITH UR FISTS PUSSYS
coolas86 9 months ago
By far one of the most effective tank destroyers of World War II. The 8.8 cm Pak dealt quite a lot of damage, knocking out allied tanks with ease.
AmazingAspie 9 months ago 8
Comment removed
ThugCologne 9 months ago
@ThugCologne Sorry but africa was 1941 while the jadgpanther first saw action in 1944
McDangerouslyHappy 9 months ago
The JagdPanther is the most aesthetically pleasing AFV of WWII as much as such a thing is possible.
lew7272 10 months ago 9
Maybach powered ??
trimode11 10 months ago
Belle bête :)
FucK88vivalaFrancia 10 months ago
Did you see the flame coming out from the exhaust pipe? I almost had a heart attack
thesantiso 10 months ago 2
MAGNIFIQUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SIM1944 10 months ago 3
1 owner of T34 dislikes this video :))
janodespota 10 months ago 31
@janodespota It could have been a Sherman owner! LOL
wnyvideo 9 months ago 5
@janodespota
And a Churchill owner and the driver of a poor little Sherman.
BunrakukenIII 7 months ago
@BunrakukenIII
exactly :D
janodespota 7 months ago
@janodespota damit i own a t-34 in a game :(
Mongol193 6 months ago
@janodespota Sherman dislikes this too ))
nickmymy 5 months ago
@nickmymy one T34 and four Shermans :D
janodespota 5 months ago
88mm L71 gun, BEST TANK GUN EVER !
Stalkera89 10 months ago
que cosa tan grande
increible el video
saludos
BeRsErKeR3T 10 months ago
Quality piece of kit.
It even has that leaning forward stance that makes it look like it's moving when it isn't.
MrTonyozzie 10 months ago
thats a nice way to drive your kids to school and avoid traffic jams!
davidc712dvd 10 months ago
Say hello to my BIG friend!
Kaarlo 11 months ago
UR MOM!
Doowoo 11 months ago
The one dude who disliked this vid was in the T-34 that was sniped by this Jagdpanther.
Treetop64 11 months ago
lol jugpanther
aselawm 11 months ago
1 guy is a Sherman tank commander
tropicthunder332 11 months ago
I have seen this Jagdpanther in action a few years ago, because i live in Koblenz. In the "Night of the Museum" a few weeks after the WTS got it from the restauration. In this night, they showed all the vehicles that are able to drive. This is the most powerful and wonderful engine sound i've ever heard. Almost tears in my eyes...;-)
deFlow1988 11 months ago 2
I want this in my garage
bierfrau9 11 months ago
Cant wait for the day when it is socially and legally accepted that tanks can be driven on the street and a viable alternative mode of transport just like cars :P
The first political party to espouse the idea will have my full support! lol
n9spooks 11 months ago
That's disgustingly awesome
M5Beast 11 months ago 4
The Nazis did a couple things right.
HereWasBob 11 months ago 4
but will it blend?
Schmoodtheman 11 months ago
Been on one of these, they are huge
riseld4 11 months ago
rally Paris - Dakkar blitzkrieg)
poklik1 1 year ago
Rated M, for MANLY!
Doowoo 1 year ago
1 American(s) dislike this vid
rlinfinity 1 year ago
The engine sounds awsome!
MrDavkoz 1 year ago 3
GReat restoration work. What a beast.
428ghost 1 year ago
ooooooooooaaaahh deiiiiiiiineeee Muttttttttteeeeeerrr.. is das geil.! oO
falcrum19 1 year ago 2
Yeah...well kiddies, these days a little guy with the right stuff would turn the old beast into scrap metal.
vladdrac88 1 year ago
thats not how you spell ground
keegrockz 1 year ago
Wow, I can just imagine a poor Sherman crew watching from where the cameraman is located......... guess they would cut out and run for their lives, as their cannon was no match to the 88mm gun. Most impressive.
billace90 1 year ago 2
"Licence and registrations, please."
"ACHTUNG, FIRE!"
MrSindari 1 year ago 66
@MrSindari lmao
muzikscud23 9 months ago
@MrSindari why u say the 1st word in german and the2nd in english?
waffenfreund 9 months ago
@MrSindari
Feuer not fire...
MyMMC 7 months ago
elegant tank
Axisarmy 1 year ago
why a tank w/o a spinning turret? must've been inaccurate as hell. reply. explain.
12ut5 1 year ago
@12ut5
Read about a subject before asking questions or making a statement that is bonkers.
The reason for producing an assault gun it that without the turret one could place more armour, a bigger gun, lower the costs and produce more of them compared to a turretted version of it.
In the case of the jagdpanther this was a monstrous 8.8cm L71 compared to the Panther 7.5cm L70.
It was also not inaccurate, really that is a strange thing to say, it had the same optics as normal german tanks.
Dreachon 1 year ago 2
@Dreachon
German optics were of high quality, when this was coupled to a weapon like the 8.8cm L71 led to 85% chance of hitting the target at 1000m.
The sheer power of this gun also allowed to take down a sherman at a distance of well over 2000m.
The jagdpanther still had 13 degree traverse to both left and right with it's main gun, allowing it to make changes without the need to move as long as the target remained in this field, even easier when it was firing at long range.
Dreachon 1 year ago 2