Gun control is bad

[TehOrkyMan]

I'm a Brit who does think that gun control has got out of hand. But you still have to look at the facts. The UK has the one of the fewest proportion of gun-related deaths a year in the world. The USA has more gun-deaths a year than Somalia.

[jubbles2343]

@TehOrkyMan even if that were true I doubt each gun related death in somalia is recorded, its not exactly asthough "CSI Somalia" exists lol

[Tarzan2402]

In countries where there aren't a lot of guns there aren't as many murders. Most people are lazy and weak. If they want to kill someone and they have a gun they will do it. But that same person won't go out of their way to kill someone by some other means. Tying someone to train tracks? That's a lot harder than shooting them.

I think the second amendment is great but we still need to be extremely careful about who we allow to buy guns and what kinds of guns they can buy.

[FireBirdsGo]

Good video, you made a lot of good points. It's good to come across another Brit who has the sense to see through the illogical arguments and lies spread by the media. Subscribed! Take care.

[GrizzPaul]

@FireBirdsGo lol shit due, media here just as bad, but least we gt the second amendment to protect us from an out right ban.

[FireBirdsGo]

@GrizzPaul thats true, but the second amendment will only protect you as much as you protect it. What I mean is, too many federal restrictions already exist in the US and it will continue to get worse unless almost every gun owner over there puts pen to paper and lets their local government representative know that they strongly oppose any gun control. And you need to do this every time the gov tries to push new restrictions in. Get yourselves heard.

[therealthemichael]

Generally speaking, I don't agree with a complete ban on hand guns, and hunting rifles. I do feel with the purchase there should be a waiting period and a back ground check. However, I think something like an AK47 should be outlawed. It is a completely unnecessary. I for one will never own a gun, I have a dog, works just as well, and playing with him doesn't result in any bullet wounds.

[luzac159]

@therealthemichael why should the ak47 be banned? people who legally possess guns are MUCH less likely to kill someone with a gun then a person with an unregistered weapon. besides, if you register you gun and murder someone, it's easy to trace, so murdering someone with a registered gun is stupid.

[therealthemichael]

@luzac159 Well, let us hope the person who murders you has registered his weapon.

[GrizzPaul]

@luzac159 thats true, to allot of us gin lover here in American, registration is a precursor to confiscation.

[Bigqwertyuo1]

Just a quick point...

How do you know gun crime wouldn't have risen MORE sharply if the guns hadn't been banned?

[jubbles2343]

simple mate, there were no other factors withing the UK that changed so significantly as to increase crime. eg. a mass increase in poverty.

the only thing that changed was the level of gun control

[Bigqwertyuo1]

HOWEVER, and I'm not saying you're wrong, with guns legal the only way someone can by arrestied is during the act of the crime. If guns are illegal, then law-abiders will abide and criminals can be arrested - because if the law says "no guns" then if I am law abiding I won't carry a gun and the only people arrested for it will be people who are criminals anyway, if you get my drift?

[cassidy99ful]

@Bigqwertyuo1 unless you just start randomly searching people how do you know who the criminal is?only when the criminal commits a crime will you know but by that time you are already dead.I don't know about you but i rather like breathing.

[NewWorldRenegades]

You can't even walk home during the week in the early hours of the morning without being followed, or asked where you a going, what you are doing, where you are coming from.... and if you use your right to remain silent.. you're in trouble. Wake up people, there is no such thing as a democracy.

[NewWorldRenegades]

We live in a society where we can be arrested and locked up for 'intending' to do something, no actions, no threats, just intentions....... thought police, anyone??

[NewWorldRenegades]

A criminal is someone who breaks the law. For every law the government puts in place there will be more people who end up on the other side of the fence. The ban on guns and these statistics prove this... banning guns has done nothing more than convince more people that the grass is greener on the other side. You can only tell a man what to do so many times before he turns around and tells you to go fuck yourself.

[Noahthebeast09]

Well gun control works in communism, not in democracy.

[Killerspider762]

Very good video! Anyone who beleives gun control laws are effective at reducing crime, is a retard. You showed the numbers right their. Those are fact that cant be argued with.

5*

[therealthemichael]

@Killerspider762 You could argue with them if you had the mental capacity to look further into the statistic, rather than just saying there were x in 1997 and y in 2006, why not look at it in an intelligent manner and focus on other factors. Simply looking at population size, you can see that per person they did in fact decrease. Also, when making a bold statement, such as the people who disagree with me are retarded, try knowing the difference between there and their.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael Oh well excuse me for using the wrong spelling. Put it this way. People who beleive in gun contol arent retarded, they've just been brought up wrong or are cowards and dont understand how society works. Is that sophisticated enough for you?

[therealthemichael]

I'd say I had a pretty good upbringing. I don't have a criminal record, and I am in college, and a good one at that. Not wanting to use a gun = coward, is just bad logic. And having taken multiple sociology and criminology courses, I feel like I have decent enough understanding of society, to say that where I am at in life, I don't need a gun. As far as your answer, no it is not sophisticated enough, you still made typos and spelling mistakes.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael You got it all wrong. You arent a coward for using a gun, you are a coward for being so fearfull about criminals owning guns that you want to disarm everey innocent person. Newsflash buddy, there is such a thing as shooting somone in self defence. Do you think the founding fathers ( assuming your american) were brilliant? They thought the people should be "well armed" . I dont think they were insane and I think they understood the matter betterthatn me or you.

[therealthemichael]

You are right, nothing has changed since 1786, the original constitution applies to life today. They were so smart, not to outlaw slavery when it was ratified, we should bring it back.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael Yes, thats great logic :P

 We are talking about guns not slaverey.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael oh and also, the founding fathers  are sure as fuck smarter than you.

[therealthemichael]

No, what I said really is good logic. I am using an example of how the original draft of the constitution was flawed. And I never claimed to be more intelligent than anyone, but things that applied over 200 years ago don't necessarly apply to today

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael BAsic rights still apply. Besides, giving blacks freedom, was giving more liberty, not taking it away.

[GrizzPaul]

@therealthemichael lol only a tyrannical person would say that dude.

right to keep and bare arms is never out of date dealing with tyrannical governments.

[Membrane556]

He is right a criminal that is planning a bank robbery or murder is not going to care about violating a weapons law.

[therealthemichael]

@Membrane556 That is not the point of gun control laws, the point is to make it harder for the criminal to get access to a gun.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael if a criminal is willing to commit crimes, they wont mind breaking the law a few more time in order to be well armed.

[therealthemichael]

No shit. Like I said, the point is to make it harder for them to get a gun.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael How often do criminals on parole have guns? Alot! it isnt making it harder for them since it was illegal for them in the first place to own a gun while on parole.

[therealthemichael]

Have you ever tried buying something that is illegal? It makes it a lot harder. I could buy weed right now by making one phone call, but still the fact that it is illegal makes it a hell of a lot more expensive.

[Killerspider762]

@therealthemichael Ok, then when all the law abiding citezens are disarmed, it should be alot of fun when the gun weilding criminal attacks :D. The only people who would care to follow the gun control laws would be the law abiding citizens. I myself am not old enough to LEAGALLY own a gun. I think I am responsible enough but dont own one since its illegal. Should I never own a gun? I who would never shoot an innocent person? Are you gonna shoot somone? So should you not be alowed to own a gun?

[GrizzPaul]

@therealthemichael true and hella allot easier to get, you know I'm surprised our leaders don't understand a simple concept.

[SM110989]

and id rather have a knife in a knife fight, and keep it old school with fist fights, if u need a gun to win thats just sad, and pathetic, to me that means theyll get no respect from me

[RacoonBurglar]

u value your pride more than your life?

[jubbles2343]

well if you want to do that then do it but you certainly would get a darwin award, its not sad its common sense however thank you for reminding me that the genepool is self cleaning.

[SM110989]

im confused on where Darwinian theory comes into play, its not an evolution factor its a unsocialization and inhuman way to act. if someone broke into my apartment and had a gun and i had the suprise factor i would grab a knife and take out there arm then legs. then you call the cops and all is good. your version is shoot the person, and mess up ur place and risk getting charged with unnecessary force, my way most courts will just say ok we have the guy there both still alive, and can imprisson

[jubbles2343]

google darwin awards

[RacoonBurglar]

i loled on the last part. fucking two faces

[SM110989]

ok well thats a gun ban, thats not exactly the gun control that you say it is. gun control means a permit, and licenses, and the guns can only be sold to registered authorized ppl. given that there are illegal arms that just means if you are found in possession of an illegal firearm then you risk a long jail sentence to discourage that. and head of states and VIPs have armed guards to protect themselves against other radical armed gunmen/women would you want the president 2 walk around ungaurded

[jubbles2343]

no but i would like the same right to defend myself and others as they grant themselves

[SM110989]

yea but if there were no firearms then u wouldnt have to defend yourself with another firearm. that or i just thought of this, u could just shoot them in the legs, the pain and the fact that the legs r broken would mean that you are safe enough, the immediate threat is neutralized, theres no need to kill someone if you can neutralize in a deadly manner if you can do it and still keep the threat alive

[jubbles2343]

personally i would rather defend myself with a gun against a man with a knife, if you don't have a gun then defending yourself with a knife is much more dangerous and far less effective. Also firearms will always be in criminals hands and hence removing them from law abiding citizens does nothing but increase crime as was shown here in the UK

[SM110989]

have u ever thought to blame something on multiple factors? there is NEVER one reason for everything that happens, this is a very complicated situation, it could be a mix with the decline of western society, it could also be a mix of video games, which i doubt, and music like gangster music endorsing the gang style lifestyle, firearm assault is also related to drugs and poverty, imagine if gun control wasnt there, more ppl with guns and then the bad guys will get guns too.

[RacoonBurglar]

then the bad guys can kill eachother out. if theres gun control, good law abiding citizens cannot own them but BAD law breaking people will get them through other means. bad for us, good for them.

[SM110989]

gun control makes it harder for the BAD law abiding ppl to get better rifles, and ammo. making it harder to obtain them, so they have to go through other channels and risk burning themselves, look at canada, we have relatively lax gun control, u need licensing and permits to have guns, and we have a fairly low crime rate, although we have a majority rural population. so mab the answer is to get more green space in the cities and stuff? and yea my pride is more important than a lot of things.

[jubbles2343]

man who puts pride ahead of sense doesnt get very far, sometimes you have to know when to button up and stay quiet. this is one of them your making yourself look mighty silly

[SM110989]

ok so if wat you say is true then, there wouldnt be a europe we know now, it would be nazi europe of a russian europe. pride was a huge factor in winning WW2, with out the pride of the leaders the generals the soldiers airmen and navy personel there wouldtn have been much of a fight on all sides. so u should rethink that statement. there are stories all about how a small group of soldiers wouldnt give up for 3 whole day in a small church or school house after continuous german attack. if they

[jubbles2343]

just because it makes sense doesnt mean it will be done, and like everything pride has its time and place. WW2 well we fought that because it made sense to do so, in fact im not even going to get into this jesus christ.

[jubbles2343]

bad people have the guns already, here in the UK we implemented massive gun control, what happened was the criminals still had guns and crime level rose over 400%. Personally I don't give a damn if someone is breaking into my house and has a gun because of either video games, music, gangs or poverty they will still get the same buckshot treatment

[SM110989]

didnt have pride or self preservation, which is a form of pride i beleive then they would have ben captured and executed, just like a lot of canadian soldiers in normandy and france during the first days after the Normandy landings. i think it was 30 Canadian soldiers who were executed in the first month of action there. im not completely sure of that number just so u know but its a Canadian tradition to be proud of what you do, even if its the worst job ever

[jubbles2343]

so..? your gona take pride in your stupidity and being wrong, if thats the case then sure go for it.

[SM110989]

the fact is gun control does work, u cant base a theory like yours on 5 years. it takes at least a generation to enact veasable actions, such as a reform of a fact. to that i refer to the teinaman square incident, the bulk of the chinese population thinks that this is a pivotal point in their governments history as a positive turning point, that it was necessary for the greater good to do those attrocities. u give me something concrete and long lasting and i might give in

[jubbles2343]

only it doesnt work, its been literally decades and it hasnt worked, the principles dont work, they have no right to try and make it work, etc etc etc sorry bro but your comments so far have been wrong on every level, plus im watching a movie at the moment so i cant be arsed to comment properly haha

[SM110989]

trial and error. its a slow and painful process and unfortunately it can be costly, but it will work. and the first thing that will change is probably the suicide rate, followed by violent crimes with a deadly weapon

[jubbles2343]

suicides WTF!! , ya wana kill yourself then your going to do it by gun, by bridge etc etc thats a rediculous idea. Violent crime hmm lets see i am prepared ot blow someones head off so yes im going to break the law and get a gun illegally, and a knife, bat, rock is a frigging deadly weapon mate your chasing the end of the rainbow

[SM110989]

i said it will change, meaning in my case decrease and i assume ur from England? if u r then just reinforce the ports tunnel and airports and it will be easier to control guns, by blocking them from reaching their destination

[jubbles2343]

oh yeah just magically make reinforce them, it would take thousands of more officers, equipment etc etc, can you imagine the economic affects of stringently searching every single vehicle coming into the UK. what about boats coming into the UK but not going to the docks what you think they wont drop the cargoes off on the beaches, or islands, what about unchartered airplane flights, what about the millions of guns already in the UK please again your clutching at straws

[SM110989]

offer up a gun reward. every gun turned in, that isnt registered is taken by the police, then melted for scrap, and no questions asked. and as for the borders, of course there are gonna be ways to sneak them in, but there are no unchartered flights. all flights going through a countries airspace must have a detailed route. or they get huge fines. and possible jail time. no plan is perfect but if you reinforce borders and check container transports, u limit the possiblility of guns coming in

[jubbles2343]

gun amnestys have been tried again and again and you know what very few get handed in because bing bing bing the gov't will not put £10'000 into each and every single gun that gets handed in and a criminal can use a gun to get that much money piss easy. uh yes there are unchartered flights, do you think they are going to decide to not bring in 1000's of illegal guns into the country because its illegal to fly without sticking to certain airspace WTF you think they care? or maybe they will stop

[jubbles2343]

"oops we are going to get fined, i guess we should turn around with all these guns and not commit the huge crime because we might get fined" hmmmm, and who's going to stop them? scramble fighter jets? please dont even pretend, not to mention what about the boats, our coasts are completely unprotected. face it buddy your wrong get over it and try and make the best of a shit situation.

[SM110989]

ok then bring back capitol punishment, anyone found bringing in weapons, within a certain amount, 100 or more or watever, fact is gun CONTROL does work, it works in canada, the best way to counteract the drugs and gang violence is to get community action groups stiffer fine, and penalties, and education.and u should have used statistics not arithmatic in our conclustions

[jubbles2343]

again a wild idea that just isnt going to happen, and the death penalty doesnt stop desperate people, maybe you will just end up with people bringing in 99 weapons at a time or be forced to do it at gunpoint from another person etc (literally and metaphorically). no bro is doesnt work and you have no proof other than canada where you can still easily have access to large numbers of weapons easily. Canada's population is greatly spread out and has one of the highest gun ownership %'s in the world

[SM110989]

yea and what does that tell u? Canada has approx 3 guns for every man woman and child in the country. yet we have very few deaths because of gun violence. mab we have something that other countries dont, i like to think so. if i could guess at it it would probably be respect. and before any american goes on about how canada doesnt know how to use guns, i would like to say, that canada is, was and will be a hunting and trapping nation, and we hold the record for longest confirmed kill. bout 2KM

[jubbles2343]

tells me that canda has a sensible gun culture with people using common sense regarding gun ownership even though there are many rediculous limitations such as the magazine limits etc. WHat difference does the longest kill make?

means nothing, britain has some of the best snipers in the world but we dont have nearly the same gun culture so your point is mute

[SM110989]

i didnt mean that toward u, i meant it toward americans who would say something like " yea well Canada doesnt know how to andle guns" or something like that. well there u go, u also need a license and proper ID to back up the purchase of ammunition, and u CANNOT have a loaded gun inside a house, vehicle or within 5m of a roadway boundary. its the little things like that that make a difference

[jubbles2343]

its retarded is what it is, rediculous that you cant have a loaded gun in the house pr with the roadway boundary

[SM110989]

thats not retarded. its little things that could help. so theres a difference in accidental incidents and less domestic violence with a weapon.

[jubbles2343]

little things like convicting criminals work well, having a loaded gun ready saves time and your life at times

[SM110989]

yea , i have one question, would you shoot to kill or to neutralize? as in knee or arm or something like that

[jubbles2343]

given the situation eg. breaking into the house. It would be very hard for me to have the time to decide to netralize or kill, in essence I would just shoot him. I don't think there would be time, however until I have hindsight I can't say.

[SM110989]

i would go for a gut shot, unless i saw that it was a kid id go for the hip. but i would probably just call the cops then hit em over the head with something

[thaifan88]

I bet you would. You talk a lot of shit for someone who I am assuming has never been in a situation like this. If someone is in your house you don't have time for the police. The police can't protect you only you can protect yourself.

[SM110989]

ok well ill take them out, then call the cops. good for u?

[robza13]

I think really the government also want the citizens to have no power so if they did somthing bad (Holocaust/nazi type thing) they would have a nation of un armed people to take on

[mustangkraft505]

this video was right on! in Washington dc the violent crime rate plummeted after the handgun ban was repealed thank god for the nra! the fact that potential victims might be armed is a pretty powerful deterrent

[robza13]

but i think youd agree, its much more than the handgun/semi/full auto bans, its the patronising unfair embarrasing restrictions we are given on our guns and what we can own,

[robza13]

i dont see any pint fighting any more, our shit govornment and anti gun dickheads wont listen because they are ignorant and selfish they dont give a crap about gun crime they just thought they were right and now wont admit they were wrong, america is the shooters only hope :)

[FishHuntEatRepeat]

"Both the oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms."

- Aristotle

[sniper6081]

No, under a republic everyone is equal under the law. Under a democracy you have no rights because people can vote them away at any time. It's a good thing we're not a democracy.

[jubbles2343]

unfortunately you are in a democracy, you think those magazine limits and full auto restrictions wernt voted in by someone...

[sniper6081]

No we don't. By definition of the Constitution we live in a constitutional republic. Yes, there are democractic processes which take place in my country, but there are so few. In a democracy people get to vote on laws and everything that happens in the government. However, that would create tyranny of the majority. That's why we only electa few people we can trust to uphold the constitution and even then a bill has to go through rigorous processes before it becomes a law.

[gingerishguy]

i completely agree with you jubbles2343 whoever came up with gun control laws is an idiot

[StantheGunman]

All victims of violence and massacres have one two things in common, they were all unarmed. And they all wish they werent. Having guns or not is an issue of trust, why should anyone trust a goverment that doesent trust its citizens to own guns?

[unbekannteraffe]

First sentence rubbish. Last one isn't.

[unbekannteraffe]

First part of the video:

How much effort is it to kill someone with a gun in comparison to fists/club/whatever? It is a lot harder to decide to beat someone (repeatedly) instead of pointing at him and pulling a trigger. It doesn't mean that you can't kill someone if you want to, but it is not so easy to kill in rage for example.

Second part of the movie:

I don't believe any figures (especially online) without a source.

[magition612]

but if the good guy had a gun he can protect himself from the bad guy.......

[unbekannteraffe]

Yeah, shoot him and go to prison. Happy End! Stupidface.

[jubbles2343]

I already sent you the source of the figures

[unbekannteraffe]

Actually, no, you haven't.

[jubbles2343]

oh well il email it to you then

[thingy186]

Wrong! In Britain it is legal to use force proportional to the threat to defend yourself, so if you were under threat from an armed criminal it would be legal to shoot them, except it's unlikly to happen because 1.) not enough law abiding people have guns and 2.) idiots like you convice people that self-defence is illigal and so the armed criminal would get away with it because no one would be willing to confront them! Happy End! Stupidface.

[jubbles2343]

can't own a firearm for self defence though.

[thingy186]

True. That needs to change.

[unbekannteraffe]

I know that you are allowed to use deadly force in order to protect you, but there are some points to it. First of all, you only may shoot if there is no other way like escaping. Secondly, if you are armed and the criminal is too, there is a high chance of being shot instead of "being a hero". There is no real point in carrying a gun with you to defend yourself if the attacker doesn't want to kill you. Anyways, that happens very rarely, why would anyone risk a life sentence for a normal robbery?

[ClassicFIHD]

Actually 18 states have passed the Castle Doctrine where you have no obligation to retreat. You can shoot to kill anyone in your house that has no right to be there armed or not. You can shoot to kill an unarmed person steeling you car. Joe Horn less than a year ago killed 2 people robbing his neighbors house in Texas.

Best reason to carry a gun:

watch?v=lGAC3mMObb0

[gshowell76]

Click on my name and you'll see a link to my website. It's petition to restore handgun ownership in the UK for self defence.

Why do some people still believe that passing laws is the best way to deal with people that don't obey laws.

Truly bizarre thinking !!!

[danielod]

They should leave it how it is. I dont want muggers walking around with m16. It would also be much harder on the police.

[jubbles2343]

you have just pointed out the problem. THEY ALREADY HAVE THE WEAPONS BUT WE DON'T. Also the whole point of background checks is to rpevent criminals buying weapons legaly.

[danielod]

Yeah some do try hard and get them but alot of criminals get caught trying to buy weapons nowadays. If the laws were more relaxed there would be alot more gun crime, which would cause some police dying which is bad.

[jubbles2343]

how would it be easier? and why would crime go up? do you actually know anything about the process of buying a firearm?

[danielod]

If the laws were relaxed people who were not able to get a gun before would now have a chance and there would be alot more guns in the open then, say if some one burglury they could take the weapons and then they wouldnt be on the police books. I am for gun control but not when its as easy as someplace like america and they have one of the worst gun crimes in the world.

[jubbles2343]

actually mate gun stores are very well protected. They generally have a 1metre thick wall of concrete around the gun storage area and a 4 minute response by armed police should the alarm go off. Also the only people who cannot get guns currently is those who have criminal convictions or are mentally incapable, relaxing gun laws would not allow these people to get these guns it would allow people to own more types of firearms. no offense mate but you clearly don't know how it works.

[danielod]

Not gun shops, gun owners most of the time get their weapons stolen, so the serial traces back to them. If the laws were relaxed alot more people would be able get control of guns. And to get a gun now you have to have special storage,a good reason and be with a homeoffice club. So most people with a criminal record dont get in the clubs so easy.

[jubbles2343]

"gun owner most of the time get their weapons stolen" seeing as gun owners are law abiding I doubt that, considering the average gun using criminal has no use for a bolt action rifle. Almost all guns used by criminals are illegally imported or made in the UK. I do not know one gun owner who has had a gun stolen, you make it sound as though 2 out of 3 have their guns stolen. Very few people have them taken, probably less than 5%

[iwatchmassvideo]

Liberals are against guns and point to Japan who has barely any guns and says we are by far the worst in gun deaths, that may be true BUT, look at Switzerland. Every family owns a gun and they have nearly NO gun-related deaths nor crime. The problem isn't people have guns, it's not ENOUGH people own guns. If a thug was going to rob someone, which would he prefer? A defenseless target, or an armed one?Let alone an ARMED community.Imagine 30 people having guns and one thug tries to rob one of them

[cressy7]

wat i cant understand is thay give us an FAC because were a none threat to the public and can own a firearm but we cant have a pistol or a semi auto rifle

[jubbles2343]

becuase they are left wing scum that hate us.

[quicksiliva]

Guns are used for killing people. Criminals gets guns because guns exist and are obtainable. Good people have to buy guns to protect themselves from Criminals who got the guns because more people than not believe guns should exist. Therefore Criminals with guns exist because good people want guns.

[jubbles2343]

did you ever consider that bad people might make guns aswell. Also its a very big assumption to say more people than not beleive that guns should exist, is this something that you know for a fact or your opinion? Its a very flawed arguement.

[quicksiliva]

Ok, it's an assumption, but looking at laws, wouldn't you say more people than not believe they should exist? Maybe I should rephrase to say more people than not believe they should be legal. Either way, you get the point. Look at people that are completely gun crazy. What if you give them the option of ridding the entire world of guns or letting them keep their own guns?  What do you think they will say?

[jubbles2343]

oh but thank you for commenting its always good to have someone challenge or question someone elses point of view/facts

[jubbles2343]

oh and part of the videos point is that even without guns people can easily kill other people. Personally i'd rather be shot dead than beaten to death or hacked to bits etc etc

[quicksiliva]

I wouldn't say easily kill each other... You'd rather die of a gun, ok. But why would you want to die at all, if you can avoid it? One on one, you can fend yourself from knife or bat. A group of hoodlums, maybe not, but you can run. You can't run from bullets. You can own a gun, but it comes down to who shoots who first.

[jubbles2343]

in answer to part one, im not sure where you come from but I live in the UK where I'd say at least 80% of people think guns are bad and would probably outlaw guns if they could. As for the gun crazy people I think they would get rid of guns lol :-P silly question.

as for easily kill each other, come on how hard is it to drive a car into someone or stab them from behind, make a home made bomb etc etc it is easy to kill people but guns give a person the ability to put themselves

[jubbles2343]

at the same level of the criminal and defend themselves with a much reduced level of risk, also as we know as gun control increases so does gun crime, if you banned all guns that would just increase the supply of guns to criminals as people sell their guns rather than have them destroyed etc etc

[raabgunner]

great vid.

[BradyU1234]

great video jubbles i agree wit u 100%

[PrevalentEvil]

the illegal gun trade is second only to drugs, and yet the socialist liberal party seems to ignore these facts. but when worst comes to worst, the will tell us that the smoke from guns will hurt our enviorment, but i think that the dead bodies of defensless people would be worse for the highly theorized global warming.

[mrringostarr]

Well Thomas, and thankyou for sharing this, I was passionately against guns this morning. But now having been faced with these facts I am going down to my local gunsmiths to buy as many as I can so I'll be armed to the teeth. And anyone who argues with these facts should be shot.

[jubbles2343]

haha it would be good if you could learn up on the legal facts and the practical facts and then use your possision o fame to do something about it! think of how many lives you will save, rapes prevented and criminals bought to justice!

People will listen to a famed person like yourself so please campaign for looser gun laws!

[billson556]

Very true! I agree 100%

[RedneckMikeSr]

5 stars rite to the point. well done.

[LTWW2]

Excellent video. I agree entirely. I did a paper for school about Australia's gun control and how it didn't decrease crime, in fact suicides actually went up.

[Scorpion4646]

Drugs are illegal, people still get them. If guns become illegal, people will still get them.

[jubbles2343]

yet for some reason some people actually think banning them will make any difference. How thick do you have to be.

[SianHumphrey]

very good

[jubbles2343]

thank you

[CHSvideoman]

People kill people not guns! If you believe the notion that guns kill...then your saying your mind is temporarily handicapped while holding a gun. Are you?

[KarrensMan69]

Liberal "minds" are perpetually handicapped.

[CHSvideoman]

Thank you!

[Louisvillecpl24]

AMEN Brother!

[AmericanSniper666]

One last comment jubbles. I enjoy all of your videos so keep them coming. This has to be the most powerful of all. Thanks from the US.

[AmericanSniper666]

Thanks jubbles for posting this. It makes it hard to believe that politicians can see it any other way. I guess they are only trying to get re-elected. Hummm... but not from my vote.

You left out one important danger if guns are banned. More innocent people will die at the hands of a poor goverement decision to ban our firearms. It is hard to defend yourself when the bad guy has a gun and you only have a "legal" pocket knife. Where is the justification? Take that to the polls and vote on it.

[NEVADA1337]

yep, crime rates went up by 40% when guns were banned in DC, More people die from high cholesterol in the U.S. then by guns, they should have background checks for Pop Eyes chicken before they should ever think about it for guns. lol

[ThinkStation]

post this as a video response to my video.

[FireStarter5160]

i complely agree jubbles2343 well said.

[Stirling22]

Thanks for sending, its fair enough that guns are designed to kill its a fact that cant escape but the thing is you do not have to use it to kill you could enjoy shooting targets at the end of the day guns dont kill people on their own it takes a human to pull the trigger.

[FireStarter5160]

Guns dont kill people, people kill people.

[jubbles2343]

not all guns are designed to kill, many are designed purely for accuracy, like the rifles that olympic shooters use.

[Stirling22]

Exactly, "enjoy it for shooting targets" as I typed before.

[jubbles2343]

:-)

[bnprenaissance]

Crime has actually increased in the states where guns were banned because people no longer can defend themselves.

[snuffynra]

since 911 gun control in this country has died down a little,they even lifted a federal ban on assault weapons ,but it will never die ,

[jubbles2343]

Gun control restricts freedoms and raises crime. Thanks for watching this could you please share it with all you friends

[snuffynra]

gun control fanatics will not look at any other side but theres

[ultimatehunter2008]

Great video yet despite all the truths people refuse to relax gun control.

[MIT1369]

Very good. COuld you post your source please?