then how do you explain how sometimes ufos come down and suck water from lakes, in some cases , sucking them dry ? Freezing a lake in another. I think the Grebennikov device says a lot for real anti-gravity. My videos explain how you can build a craft for youself, and use no fuel, it's all run by magnetic current. I have plans I'll send to anyone as a blender cad file.
@mikefromspace David Copperfield once made the space shuttle disappear, or rather made it look as though the space shuttle vanished. I have no idea how he did it, but I don't think anyone will tell you that he actually made it vanish.
Honestly I'm not really into UFOs anymore, but I'm sure you'll find someone that would like to see your cad file.
@1moresunnyday If you will notice that the top is more bulbous than the bottom, similar to an airplane wing. This means that when the craft moves in any direction it receives additional lift in the same manner an airplane would.
hello i am an inventor and it looks like you may be able to help me i will one give the world several design improvements as well as new devices as well as free energy. i do think several people have their own interperatation of how ufos will work my interperation is it will include mechanical as well as electromagnetics i am not sure of the vacuum theory seeing as thats a new one for me but i would love to chat with you and see if you may be willing to help me i also will share my ufo design.
A large metallic craft made from 10 tons of metal and machinery, will weigh 10 tons when voided of all air. 10 tons in the absence of thrust, or some vertical force equal to, but opposite of gravity will not fly, let alone float.
The submarine analogue is perfect for explaining blimps, or airships, since they utilize the upward force of a lighter-than-air molecule (like helium), along with the use of propeller engines.
@TheBlueFalconX 2/2 iii. They can accelerate from 0 to hundred of thousands of kph in a split second. Such acceleration would not be attainable by thrust alone, let alone explain how the craft remains intact under the pressure/force of such an acceleration.
@TheBlueFalconX Well you're welcome to your own opinion, but I disagree with your conclusions. Helium does not have any lifting force, it is lighter than air and therefore floats above air.
Even helicopters can be silenced with sound deadening technology.
Eye witness reports are not reliable when reporting the speed of an unknown craft flying at an unknown altitude. It might appear to be going or accelerating to mach, but there's no evidence to suggest that's actually true.
@atr1337 Helium does in fact have a lifting force, by virtue of the fact that it IS lighter than air. This IS the reason it 'floats above air'. All things must reach an equilibrium in an interactive pressure system, and in this case it's determined by Archimedes' Principle.
Yes, helicopters can be silenced to a great degree with this technology, but I'd be hard pressed to believe it would work so effectively on your design due to the horizontal air vectoring.
@atr1337 Helium does in fact have a lifting force, by virtue of the fact that it IS lighter than air. This IS the reason it 'floats above air'. All things must reach an equilibrium in an interactive pressure system, and in this case it's determined by Archimedes' Principle.
Yes, helicopters can be silenced to a great degree with this technology, but I'd be hard pressed to believe it would work so effectively on your design due to the horizontal air vectoring.
@TheBlueFalconX ...reports, there are plenty of videos/documentaries out there about the subject. There's plenty of evidence to suggest this is true.
Your prototype is nice, granted, but it's functionality limits itself to being terrestrial craft, reliant on an atmosphere to operate. It could possibly be the next personal flying vehicle.
@TheBlueFalconX I like you blue falcon... Helium does not have a force that lifts itself above air, gravity does all of the leg work and it does not pull helium up, it pulls the air down. Helium is lighter than air so gravity pulls air below it, a vacuum is lighter than air so gravity pulls air below it. This is why air hangs around our atmosphere rather than just floating around in space, it's heaver than a vacuum and attracted to large masses, such as the Earth.
@TheBlueFalconX Eye witness reports are not reliable enough to indicate anything near the actual speed of what was seen, they're not even reliable enough to indicate if something was even seen at all, which is why so many people don't believe in UFOs at all.
I too believe this technology would make an excellent personal vehicle, better yet I think it would make superb mobile living spaces. Your house could float in the sky using very little energy.
@TheBlueFalconX Noticed I forgot to address your sound cancellation assertions. I believe that sound can be 'canceled' by using audio speakers. A computer analyzes the sound generated by the craft and then produces an inverted sound wave that cancels out the original sound wave, thus silencing the craft. I couldn't say for sure, but this technology might not be able to silence a helicopter 100% yet, but close enough to make it quite useful for covert ops.
I've seen cylinders with no air and even handled them, just a vacuum and they didn't float away let alone a giant metallic craft being able to do that. I tend to thing it would have to be gravity related and we don't have that ( publicly anyway ) because the tech doesn't exist on earth. We don't even know how to manipulate GRAVITY. It's possible that this could be PART of how it could work maybe for steering, but using gravity particles/waves as well.
@Nighthawkzone2 Generally I'm happy to receive whatever comes my way, but you should know that money is not something that I seek and if it did come my way there's a good chance I wouldn't know what to do with it.
@atr1337 seeing as you like balloons try this one; Pick a point, any point in space, tied one end of a long rope to it, on the other end fasten a seat/chair, sit in that seat. Now you can Go Around the World in One Day, rather than 80 Days! lol
@arshdeep125 You could try to explain electro dynamic field generation yourself if you like. However; I think you may be confused on the subject. Are you sure you're not just thinking of the, as of yet, unexplained ability of electrons to spontaneously 'appear' on the opposite side of a non-conductive material?
For instance when electricity passes through rubber coated wire some electrons for unknown reasons simply appear outside the wire/rubber. This has nothing to do with flight.
I see the reasoning and this design would be a killer sub but I am stil an advocate ofof maglifte but if the two technologies were combined then I think we might have something. What if the cambers were magnets to bounce off the earth's magnetic field?
@Kenoshea328 Maybe someday, but I feel this would require a network of super high speed, processing/communication, satellites. This would be so information regarding the magnetosphere could be sent to the craft in time for it to make adjustments compensating for fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field.
As it stands the technology for such high speed monitoring and communication does not yet exist.
Your theory is all fucked up! For one thing the craft would need a static centre piece in order to rotate the outer section, but keeping that centre piece stationary without bolting it to the ground would be impossible as centrifuge forces created by the spinning outer diameter would cause the centre to spin also cancelling out any possible lift or thrust as the whole unit just sits on the ground spinning out of control!!
@atr1337 Are you for real!!! The video is talking about UFOs, ya know flying saucers, and your fucking around with balloons! I see no relational matter to what I said, in your comment.
@kryckeestrooff Actually if it took 48 hrs to make the craft it wouldn't matter if the day had 24 or 48 hrs in it, it would still take 48 hrs to make the craft.
@MrMinstrel786 Aluminum should work alright, but better yet there's carbon fiber and even better still is the up and coming carbon nano-tube material.
@jonnyeverything Obviously I agree that this would work, but I do not personally believe that the amount of fuel required to lift a modern space shuttle to the moon has much to do with it.
@jonnyeverything this will Not work unless the craft + vacuum(0) is lighter than the air underneath same as submarine.BUT what IF the air around the craft could be manipulated to increase its density using magnetism drawing the air molecules closer together and heavier by use of a generator and ran across a GRAPHENE hull which is the most conductive new material and weighs nothing, thinner than a mm stronger than stainless steel.BUT this and that would not fly in space
@jett0237 UNLESS I can figure out how to push and pull on the higgs bozon which is everywhere even in space..Must be electro magnetism ran on a hydrogen engine producing water as a byproduct for galactic travel..maby statically charge the particles then push with magnet..in theory if works could travel close to the speed of light ...now i need a hydrogen fusion engine the size of a basketball for a power source..hmmm any ideas for an alternate power source email me jett_cramer@yahoo
Making an object less dense than the surrounding material would make it buoyant, but... air is so thin, that even a small mass would keep the device glued to the ground. The device would have to weigh a few pounds and yet be able to maintain a vacuum in a space the size of room. Only then it would float like a balloon.
Except what material can resist atmospheric pressure and be so incredibly light? The answer is: nothing. Which is why nobody has ever done it before.
Nonsense. Only if the object in question weighed as much as fabric on a balloon, yet be strong enough to resist the vacuum pressure might the object become less dense than the air and float. An object the size of a car would have to have less mass than 5 lbs or 2 kg.
Water is at least 100 times denser than air, so you can have objects with substantial mass that are still less dense than the displaced water. Doing so doesn't require particularly exotic materials.
@ikan0uchuujin You're thinking too small, I'm thinking of rather large objects, much larger than a vehicle, that take up a lot of space, but have very little mass. Much like an airship, but with light rigid materials capable of withstanding a vacuum. The inner portions of the vacuum chamber would need reinforcements on the interior to direct weight to particular load bearing locations.
This technology could open the sky as living space.
@atr1337 My point was- which you missed entirely- is that air's density is so low, you'd need materials that weigh so little versus the volume they can enclose... yet be able to resist collapse against a vacuum... that it's physically impossible to do the same in air as we do in water.
The only reason we can do it in water is that water is incredibly dense versus many other materials. So it's easy to make structures that are less dense than the volume of water they displace.
@ikan0uchuujin The first supersonic jet was capable of withstanding 19 times it's own weight, this would only need to withstand about it's own weight.
@atr1337 You still don't get it. You have to build a huge machine that weighs a feather but can keep out air at 15 lbs per square inch. Can you keep out air from a vacuum chamber built out of aluminium foil? A vacuum chamber that is the size of a house? No, of course not. There's no material known that would be light enough and airtight enough to do what you propose. Even carbon fiber would be too heavy.
A membrane and struts built out of diamond might do it but they'd be incredibly fragile.
@haolovemaria I suppose the use of air making the craft not considered a UFO is a matter of opinion. I don't believe that UFOs operate in space. Well... Not the UFOs I'm talking about anyway, I suppose anything can be a UFO if it's flying and unidentified eh?
There is a way to make a flying saucer fly without any moving parts check out flying saucers flying triangles how they fly and gravity can make a steel ball fly KEEP SEARCHING FOR THE ANSWERS
thanks for video and Its interesting idea.But, for instance, think about a can,if you vacuum the air in the can, then it will be crushed because of pressure of air.(inner/outer pressure balance) What do you think about it?
@zantanriyar You are welcome for the video, I enjoy making these things. I agree that an aluminum can would be crushed if it contained a vacuum, but it is only because it was not designed to contain a vacuum. If the can contained a system of rigid bars inside of it connecting each side to the other then it will be 'reinforced.' Moreover you'd probably want to construct it out of thicker aluminum or, better yet, carbon fiber which is lighter and stronger.
@obalisk990 The materials that makeup the craft will be heavier than air yes, but the because the craft contains a vacuum the entirety of the craft will 'displace' more weight in air than the craft itself weighs. Same principle as a blimp or balloon.
@obalisk990 In my opinion this probably works, but since I lack the access to proper materials and tools I have no way of constructing a physical version of this concept.
What else would you like to know about this? There's really not much to it, read about blimps and you'll probably have a good idea of how this should work. One way this tech could be kept secret is to convince people that it's far more complicated than it actually is.
@atr1337 dude this absolutly would not work even in your wildest dreams creating a vacum in an object would not make it float, you realy think taking the air out of something makes it float?? even if it made the space inside lighter then air the metal the craft is made from weighs infinatly more the the amout of weight lost from air removal, what would happen however, it the air preasure on the outside would become infinatly greater then the vacume on the inside, and it would basicly implode
I'm not a scientist nor a mathematician but i'm pretty sure that water and air is totally a different elements. Laws of water is different from the laws of air..
@yudishappadoo Your guess is as good as mine... Fear perhaps, fear is usually a good motivator, but generally motivates people in the wrong direction.
@yudishappadoo the reason this has not been released to the public is because ITS COMPLETE CRAP!! creating a vacum in an object would not make it float, you realy think taking the air out of something makes it float?? even if it made the space inside lighter then air the metal the craft is made from weighs infinatly more the the amout of weight lost from air removal
The problem with this idea (although kind of awesome) is that even when the craft has been voided of air and is in a state of vacuum, the craft is still denser than air due to the structure that makes it up. For a craft to gain buoyancy on/in oxygen the surface area would have to be impractically large.
Interesting interpretation, but these craft do not manipulate "air" directly, rather they manipulate the "ether" or energy field, thus they can cancel their weight and inertia...
You really do not understand physics at all. In order to perform right angle turns at the speeds UFOs are purported to travel at, you would have to somehow cancel inertia. Otherwise, the pilots would turn into mush and the craft would destroy itself. What you have here is a helicopter.
Figure out how matter can have its state altered so it has no mass, and then make a proposal.
@ShockL0ver One thing I know about people is they have a tendency to exaggerate. Obviously I believe people have seen abnormally performing aircraft, but I feel there is a good chance that many of them may have exaggerated the characteristics of the craft they saw.
Je dis la même chose : comment faire de cet engin amphibie (air/eau), un vaisseau spatial ?
A mon avis, la seule façon d'échapper à la pesanteur ou attraction universelle, avec un vaisseau lourd, trouve sa solution du côté de la recherche de l'antimatière. Il y a donc encore beaucoup de recherches !
Same : how to do an amphibians ship becomes a space's one ? I'm sure there is no other solution than anti-matter using engine to do it. But till that is there many researches to conduct !
Je dis la même chose : comment faire de cet engin amphibie (air/eau), un vaisseau spatial ?
A mon avis, la seule façon d'échapper à la pesanteur ou attraction universelle, avec un vaisseau lourd, trouve sa solution du côté de la recherche de l'antimatière. Il y a donc encore beaucoup de recherches !
Same : how to do an amphibians ship becomes a space's one ? I'm sure there is no other solution than anti-matter using engine to do it. But till that is there many researches !
@blackls400 Very Good i'm glad someone like you has a bit of brains this video is bullshit.UFOs are a lot more high tech than that.They have mastered time where there is no friction by warping time.
@Asus1133 Well I think there are a number of ways to solve that problem. For starters, when the craft is simply hovering it would make no noise at all. As for when the pumps or engine are operating I believe boeing has proven that one can drastically reduce the sound foot print by simply calculating the curves of the intake/exhaust properly. In addition to that the military has been able to produce virtually silent helicopters using sound cancellation technology.
@cH33zewarri0r Actually it's both, buoyancy and displacement are related. For instance a solid chunk of metal will sink, where a log of wood of the same weight will float because it is less dense. The wood has the same weight of the metal, but it is larger and thus displaces more water than it weighs. The point is that a sub does not float because air "puses up" on the ballast tanks.
What an absolute crock. Regardless of there being air or a vacuum being in the supposed "chambers", the physical weight of the ship has to be less than tng yourhat of the surrounding a ir for gravity to loose its effect on the saucer. Just because you can make fancy graphics, a scientifically astute individual this does not make. Please stop wasting your as well as our time with your poorly thought out theories, Thank you.
@Asus1133 Submarines are not all of the same shape, personally I believe the ones with a saucer shape are classified and use the technology in this video. As for UFOs, they also come in a variety of shapes I believe. I've seen reports allegedly from pilots who have seen cigar shaped UFOs. The typical military submarine seems to have a cigar shape.
oh btw this idea sound crafty but donst work.. in a submerine the ir in the ballest pushes up ..this idea doesnt carry to your example either air or vacum nothing outpushes the weiht of the craft.. also air cant be rought from below like that
your graphics and display are good here on the video keep thinking :)
@frank0067 The ballast tanks in a sub do not push up, their purpose is to change the density of the submarine's contents. The ballast tank is more dense when it is full of water vs when it is not. That's how buoyancy works, it's based on density. Same principle with a vacuum. A vacuum is less dense than air and therefore the craft becomes buoyant when the air is removed.
At any rate I agree that UFOs are not alien technology.
@frank0067 I've discussed the air intake on the bottom before and believe it would work perfectly well, especially since the craft would be in motion when the air is brought in. For instance an F-16's intake is mounted on the bottom of the craft. Nonetheless if you still don't like the idea of the intake being on the bottom then you could simply move the intake to the top and exhaust to the bottom.
I think you have mildly over-simplified this. Although this is a feasible new means of transportation, this construction is definitely not what is normally associated with UFOs. This is a good demonstration of engineering and i agree with your question: "why hasn't this been introduced to the public?" I think the original "ufo" construction uses actual anti-gravity propulsion and nikola tesla's technology
@renewtherepublic Although the two of us disagree whether this is the actual technology behind UFOs or not, I'm glad to see that you're out there using your head and coming up with your own opinions. I 'believe' this is the tech behind the ufo phenomena, but truly neither of us will know for sure what type of technology they use until we "get behind the wheel" of one.
@JoeBMiller97 I know it won't fly in space, but thanks for reminding me. The intake for the engine is on the bottom of the craft. The vacuum pump intake/exhaust is along the rim of the craft.
It is indeed an advanced airship/blimp, the only way to make an airship super sonic is to make the shell of the craft rigid. Traveling fast would rip a regular blimp to pieces. As long as you're making a rigid craft you might as well utilize a vacuum for it's superior lifting capability.
@eason3, this is clearly not a craft that would fly in space with whats shown in this video. The most it is is, as I said, an advanced blimp. And blimps dont go into space my freind.
very ineresting idea, its basicly aadvanced blimp and it would have no posibility of going of planet, but very interesting. also where is the intake for the jets?
Saucer craft work off of the premise of electromagnetics where there is a separation of positive and negative flow of electrons around the exterior of the craft. The air float type design there is ridiculous.
@eason3 You know what I find funny? I don't even care how UFOs work and yet here I am with this video. There are many people out there who have waited their whole life to find out the truth behind UFOs, put it right in front of their faces and many of them deny it because they refuse the accept that they've been had by what amounts to little more than a clever parlor trick.
You're not going to make it anywhere in life by refusing the truth just to save yourself a bit of humiliation.
@MSDjMichaelSlash For starters it's probably quite expensive, I mean carbon fiber isn't exactly the cheapest material around. In addition to that, although I couldn't say for sure, I do not think that half of YouTube's viewers have seen this video.
Nice design, it kinda has a similar concept to a helium balloon too. I say it may work as a unmanned aircraft. You won't be able to stuff someone in there basically because there was no allocated space. It won't be able to tilt and spin at the same time which may mean that it'll be unstable.
@AaronKSLee You know I never considered the possibility that someone might want to tilt and spin at the same time, off the top of my head I can't think of a reason as to why someone would want to.
Although the design presented in my video does not allow for passenger space I believe that this technology can manifest with a number of designs some of which allow for passenger space.
@novata01 You are correct that this craft would not likely fly in space, however; I feel your assertion regarding the air pushing it down to be misleading. Air has weight to it yes and the air above the craft will be pushing it down, just like on any craft. The point is that the air inside the craft also has weight and pushes the craft down, by removing that air we remove that weight and the pushing force it exerts on the craft, that's how it is made lighter.
@atr1337 Good point. Air does have a weight, or MASS, and so does the craft. It is almost as if you are saying that a vaccuum would fly because a vaccuum is nothing and nothing has no mass, is this correct? If I have a container and I successfully remove all of the air from it, I have only removed the mass of the air, not the mass of the container, or craft.
@novata01 Let's say you have a sealed container with air in it. The materials of the container weigh 10lbs and the air inside weighs 8lbs, the entirety of the container is 18lbs. Remove the air and now the container weighs 10lbs.
@novata01 If you have a craft that displaces 4500lbs of air, the craft's constructing materials weigh 3000lbs and the air in the craft weighs 2000lbs for a total craft weight of 5000lbs it will sit on the ground like a rock. Remove the 2000lbs of air inside the craft and the total craft weight is now 3000lbs which is less than the 4500lbs of air it displaces, making it lighter than the amount of air that would otherwise occupy it's space.
@novata01 he's saying that this will dramatically cut down on the craft's weight making high maneuverability possible. The propulsion is created by the air flow over the top which creates lower pressure just like aircraft wings. In theory, this will be enough to counteract the remaining weight.
It wont work, simply because you just cant put any one in it. It's based on revolution and no one could withstand the amount of G's it generates and require just to stay in flight, even worse if it has to make a quick turn. Surf the web, the army already tried your design and it failed just because of that reason. That technology works with air not sure for water. Another problem is that tehcnology cant work in the vacuum of space. So no, Ufo's dont use that technology.
@nextdeath22 This craft is not based on revolution I don't think, perhaps you could explain what you mean when you say it's based on revolution. The pumps have revolving elements yes, but the hole craft does not continuously revolve, just like a helicopter's blades rotate, but the helicopter's hull only rotates when the pilot commands it to.
As far as the army's tests, I am unaware of any such test, perhaps you'd be willing to mention what phrases I should search to find this information.
@MrChristopher1213 It has been said that you know you're on to something when you start pissin' people off. I must be really on to something then.
BTW, you speak like a person that is afraid that they've contributed nothing of their own to the world, so you try to make the contributions of others look poor in order to take attention away from your own lack of contribution.
Consider an empty Boeing 747. As a cylinder, it obviously DISPLACES more air than the shape of your design. It weights approx. 400,000 lbs. The volume of its cabin is 34,000 cubic feet. That much air weights around 2,750 lbs. Now, Archimedes would tell us that if we evacuated all that air from the cabin, the 747 would still weight...397,250 lbs!!! AND that bitch is made out of aluminum! A light material with comparable mass to carbon fiber. So now do you understand my thermos joke?
While you are correct in assuming lighter building material would compensate, matter-ial itself cannot negate mass. So as good as his calculations are, the notion of near zero-mass building-material makes even his design impractical in the physical world. Also it should be noted: his design calls for a spherical shape to maximize volume. Even if vacuum buoyancy were possible, your design here is grossly lacking the necessary volume needed, even to come close. Even so, don't stop believing!!!!
@2011timmyt Nothing is 'negating' mass in this design. You're talking about the mass of the individual components, but it is the mass of the ship as a whole that is taken into account here. The whole ship including the air in it, has mass, if you remove the air you are removing mass from the whole ship.
A fully loaded airplane has mass, unload that airplane and it's mass decreases.
@2011timmyt Also, it seems to me that the oval shape in my video would work perfectly fine, in fact better for stability purposes. If you were using a sphere it might turn end over end because there is nothing to stop it from doing so.
ok dude, I found someone else on the internet who describes vacuum buoyancy WITH mathematical notation! he indeed shows that a vacuum ship with a large enough diameter will become buoyant while resisting collapse. HOWEVER, in even his equations he fails to recognize that weight and size are proportional, meaning in his theoretical vacuum ship, he completely ignores its weight-increase by omitting mass from his equations. (when you omit a variable in an equation, you are assuming it is constant.)
okay now explain how the craft are capable of braking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom. also your description assumes that the craft is weightless to begin with, it isn't. how does it float in air? the vacuum will only remove the weight of air not the weight of the craft.
sorry but that is to simple,that is how we would make it but a spaceship no it more complex then that for instances you need a full under standing of emf gratify drive, giro a hell of a lot of electricity power to sum it op
@rajababu1982 Depends on the size of the tank. I can say, though, that carbon fiber tank will weigh less when it contains a partial vacuum compared to containing a full dose of air.
@alexfelldownawell While floating this craft would not make use of it's vacuum pumps unless traveling vertically. And even then one could probably overcome the sound issue with modern sound suppression technology.
@alexfelldownawell in videos of ufo's flying trough clouds ther is no movement of the clouds, with the power of the air coming from that would clearly blow them atleast a small bit out of place....
If you remove 500 cubic feet of air from your aircraft, you will only lighten the load by 40 lbs., while the reinforcement necessary to withstand the air pressure outside from crushing your ship to a pancake, will add hundreds of lbs. In other words, your ship will need to be very heavy, in order to lose very little weight.
@atr1337 Yes, of course, but its skin would have crushed!, if the hydrogen gas inside it was not kept pretty similar to the air pressure out of it... same thing with helium craft, and hot air balloons... relatively small differential pressures between outside and inside. Example: The ISS weighs nearly a million lbs.!, most of it structural.
@atr1337 I agree with doceigen, friend, you have no idea how large the force air pressure from outside can be. Hindenburg is filled with hydrogen just to ensure inside have same pressure with outside, so it will not crush. Watch MythBuster please, a floating balloon built with lead is the maximum thing can be done. Currently there is no any type of material is light and strong at the same time that can be used in this way.
then how do you explain how sometimes ufos come down and suck water from lakes, in some cases , sucking them dry ? Freezing a lake in another. I think the Grebennikov device says a lot for real anti-gravity. My videos explain how you can build a craft for youself, and use no fuel, it's all run by magnetic current. I have plans I'll send to anyone as a blender cad file.
mikefromspace 2 days ago
@mikefromspace David Copperfield once made the space shuttle disappear, or rather made it look as though the space shuttle vanished. I have no idea how he did it, but I don't think anyone will tell you that he actually made it vanish.
Honestly I'm not really into UFOs anymore, but I'm sure you'll find someone that would like to see your cad file.
atr1337 2 days ago
@atr1337 Oops, should've looked that up first. Apparently it was Franz Harary not David Copperfield.
atr1337 2 days ago
@atr1337 HAW DOSE THIS THING FLY IF AIR IS BEING SUCKED IN FROM THE BOTTEM
1moresunnyday 1 day ago
@1moresunnyday If you will notice that the top is more bulbous than the bottom, similar to an airplane wing. This means that when the craft moves in any direction it receives additional lift in the same manner an airplane would.
atr1337 18 hours ago
hello i am an inventor and it looks like you may be able to help me i will one give the world several design improvements as well as new devices as well as free energy. i do think several people have their own interperatation of how ufos will work my interperation is it will include mechanical as well as electromagnetics i am not sure of the vacuum theory seeing as thats a new one for me but i would love to chat with you and see if you may be willing to help me i also will share my ufo design.
h2oplasmaplug 3 days ago
@h2oplasmaplug I'd be happy to chat with you and take a look at your designs.
atr1337 3 days ago
@h2oplasmaplug Vio con dios I guess haha
atr1337 2 days ago
@atr1337 Via con dios :P
atr1337 2 days ago
PLEASE see on youtube: 2012 Prepare for the Alien Invasion? First Contact?
peaceful2300 3 days ago
@peaceful2300 Why?
atr1337 3 days ago
@peaceful2300 Deprecated!
atr1337 2 days ago
i think this is wong
ciocanlica 5 days ago
@ciocanlica Hope you enjoyed your time here at least... Best of luck finding whatever it is that you seek.
atr1337 5 days ago
1/2
A large metallic craft made from 10 tons of metal and machinery, will weigh 10 tons when voided of all air. 10 tons in the absence of thrust, or some vertical force equal to, but opposite of gravity will not fly, let alone float.
The submarine analogue is perfect for explaining blimps, or airships, since they utilize the upward force of a lighter-than-air molecule (like helium), along with the use of propeller engines.
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX 1.5/2.0 Your model has many flaws, all due to eye witness statements and video images of the actual behaviour of these craft.
i. They have been reported as silent. A turbine engine as a source of propagation, as we know, generates of tremendous amount of sound energy.
ii. They have been reported making 90° turns at greater high velocity; greater than mach.
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX 2/2 iii. They can accelerate from 0 to hundred of thousands of kph in a split second. Such acceleration would not be attainable by thrust alone, let alone explain how the craft remains intact under the pressure/force of such an acceleration.
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX All in all, you have some great animation skills, but your hypothesis here is faulty.
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX Well you're welcome to your own opinion, but I disagree with your conclusions. Helium does not have any lifting force, it is lighter than air and therefore floats above air.
Even helicopters can be silenced with sound deadening technology.
Eye witness reports are not reliable when reporting the speed of an unknown craft flying at an unknown altitude. It might appear to be going or accelerating to mach, but there's no evidence to suggest that's actually true.
atr1337 6 days ago
@atr1337 Helium does in fact have a lifting force, by virtue of the fact that it IS lighter than air. This IS the reason it 'floats above air'. All things must reach an equilibrium in an interactive pressure system, and in this case it's determined by Archimedes' Principle.
Yes, helicopters can be silenced to a great degree with this technology, but I'd be hard pressed to believe it would work so effectively on your design due to the horizontal air vectoring.
As for eye witness...
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@atr1337 Helium does in fact have a lifting force, by virtue of the fact that it IS lighter than air. This IS the reason it 'floats above air'. All things must reach an equilibrium in an interactive pressure system, and in this case it's determined by Archimedes' Principle.
Yes, helicopters can be silenced to a great degree with this technology, but I'd be hard pressed to believe it would work so effectively on your design due to the horizontal air vectoring.
As for eye witness...
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX ...reports, there are plenty of videos/documentaries out there about the subject. There's plenty of evidence to suggest this is true.
Your prototype is nice, granted, but it's functionality limits itself to being terrestrial craft, reliant on an atmosphere to operate. It could possibly be the next personal flying vehicle.
TheBlueFalconX 6 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX I like you blue falcon... Helium does not have a force that lifts itself above air, gravity does all of the leg work and it does not pull helium up, it pulls the air down. Helium is lighter than air so gravity pulls air below it, a vacuum is lighter than air so gravity pulls air below it. This is why air hangs around our atmosphere rather than just floating around in space, it's heaver than a vacuum and attracted to large masses, such as the Earth.
atr1337 5 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX Eye witness reports are not reliable enough to indicate anything near the actual speed of what was seen, they're not even reliable enough to indicate if something was even seen at all, which is why so many people don't believe in UFOs at all.
I too believe this technology would make an excellent personal vehicle, better yet I think it would make superb mobile living spaces. Your house could float in the sky using very little energy.
atr1337 5 days ago
@TheBlueFalconX Noticed I forgot to address your sound cancellation assertions. I believe that sound can be 'canceled' by using audio speakers. A computer analyzes the sound generated by the craft and then produces an inverted sound wave that cancels out the original sound wave, thus silencing the craft. I couldn't say for sure, but this technology might not be able to silence a helicopter 100% yet, but close enough to make it quite useful for covert ops.
atr1337 5 days ago
I've seen cylinders with no air and even handled them, just a vacuum and they didn't float away let alone a giant metallic craft being able to do that. I tend to thing it would have to be gravity related and we don't have that ( publicly anyway ) because the tech doesn't exist on earth. We don't even know how to manipulate GRAVITY. It's possible that this could be PART of how it could work maybe for steering, but using gravity particles/waves as well.
Still well done video and love the music!
shivercanada 1 week ago
but this technology is inefficient in space
Atlas04 1 week ago
TAKE MY MONEY!!!
Nighthawkzone2 1 week ago
@Nighthawkzone2 Generally I'm happy to receive whatever comes my way, but you should know that money is not something that I seek and if it did come my way there's a good chance I wouldn't know what to do with it.
atr1337 1 week ago
@atr1337 seeing as you like balloons try this one; Pick a point, any point in space, tied one end of a long rope to it, on the other end fasten a seat/chair, sit in that seat. Now you can Go Around the World in One Day, rather than 80 Days! lol
kryckeestrooff 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Hastrup081290 2 weeks ago
Garbage!
RAIDERS58th 1 month ago
Oops! You forgot about gravity and there's no air in space?
Victordesousa3360 1 month ago
@Victordesousa3360 The UFOs I speak of in this video do not operate in space and did not travel to this planet from afar. They are entirely man-made.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
Again I see more and more garbage about UFO technology being placed on Youtube..
Why dont' you try to explain Electro Dynamic Field Generation. Then come back with a hour long video.
arshdeep125 2 months ago
@arshdeep125 You could try to explain electro dynamic field generation yourself if you like. However; I think you may be confused on the subject. Are you sure you're not just thinking of the, as of yet, unexplained ability of electrons to spontaneously 'appear' on the opposite side of a non-conductive material?
For instance when electricity passes through rubber coated wire some electrons for unknown reasons simply appear outside the wire/rubber. This has nothing to do with flight.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
I see the reasoning and this design would be a killer sub but I am stil an advocate ofof maglifte but if the two technologies were combined then I think we might have something. What if the cambers were magnets to bounce off the earth's magnetic field?
Kenoshea328 2 months ago
@Kenoshea328 Maybe someday, but I feel this would require a network of super high speed, processing/communication, satellites. This would be so information regarding the magnetosphere could be sent to the craft in time for it to make adjustments compensating for fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field.
As it stands the technology for such high speed monitoring and communication does not yet exist.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
For this to work wouldnt the craft itsfelf have to be lighter or the same density as air to begin with?
hyperactiveturtle14 2 months ago
@hyperactiveturtle14 No, neither a blimp nor a hot air balloon are lighter than air, yet they float nonetheless.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
hahahah!!!
ericrob2112 2 months ago
Your theory is all fucked up! For one thing the craft would need a static centre piece in order to rotate the outer section, but keeping that centre piece stationary without bolting it to the ground would be impossible as centrifuge forces created by the spinning outer diameter would cause the centre to spin also cancelling out any possible lift or thrust as the whole unit just sits on the ground spinning out of control!!
kryckeestrooff 2 months ago
@kryckeestrooff Why would it need a static center piece? Neither a blimp nor hot air balloon have a static center piece and they float just fine.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
@atr1337 Are you for real!!! The video is talking about UFOs, ya know flying saucers, and your fucking around with balloons! I see no relational matter to what I said, in your comment.
kryckeestrooff 2 weeks ago
if we could only discover a new metal that has a light weight then that could be possible...
MrMinstrel786 2 months ago
@MrMinstrel786 And if only the day had 48hrs rather than 24, they could build this piece of worthless garbage twice as fast too.
kryckeestrooff 2 months ago
@kryckeestrooff Actually if it took 48 hrs to make the craft it wouldn't matter if the day had 24 or 48 hrs in it, it would still take 48 hrs to make the craft.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
kryckeestrooff 2 weeks ago
@atr1337 You have totally missed my point, that being it's all a load of bullshit!
kryckeestrooff 2 weeks ago
@MrMinstrel786 Aluminum should work alright, but better yet there's carbon fiber and even better still is the up and coming carbon nano-tube material.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
oh dear...
Televersity 2 months ago
it would work and anyone who doesnt agree doesnt think about how much fuel we use to get to the moon
jonnyeverything 2 months ago
@jonnyeverything Obviously I agree that this would work, but I do not personally believe that the amount of fuel required to lift a modern space shuttle to the moon has much to do with it.
atr1337 2 weeks ago
@jonnyeverything this will Not work unless the craft + vacuum(0) is lighter than the air underneath same as submarine.BUT what IF the air around the craft could be manipulated to increase its density using magnetism drawing the air molecules closer together and heavier by use of a generator and ran across a GRAPHENE hull which is the most conductive new material and weighs nothing, thinner than a mm stronger than stainless steel.BUT this and that would not fly in space
jett0237 2 weeks ago
@jett0237 UNLESS I can figure out how to push and pull on the higgs bozon which is everywhere even in space..Must be electro magnetism ran on a hydrogen engine producing water as a byproduct for galactic travel..maby statically charge the particles then push with magnet..in theory if works could travel close to the speed of light ...now i need a hydrogen fusion engine the size of a basketball for a power source..hmmm any ideas for an alternate power source email me jett_cramer@yahoo
jett0237 2 weeks ago
yeah.. and how would be the super speed of millions light year speed?
Ben998x 2 months ago
@Ben998x Hrmph, not sure what you're getting at here...
atr1337 2 weeks ago
Making an object less dense than the surrounding material would make it buoyant, but... air is so thin, that even a small mass would keep the device glued to the ground. The device would have to weigh a few pounds and yet be able to maintain a vacuum in a space the size of room. Only then it would float like a balloon.
Except what material can resist atmospheric pressure and be so incredibly light? The answer is: nothing. Which is why nobody has ever done it before.
ikan0uchuujin 2 months ago
Nonsense. Only if the object in question weighed as much as fabric on a balloon, yet be strong enough to resist the vacuum pressure might the object become less dense than the air and float. An object the size of a car would have to have less mass than 5 lbs or 2 kg.
Water is at least 100 times denser than air, so you can have objects with substantial mass that are still less dense than the displaced water. Doing so doesn't require particularly exotic materials.
ikan0uchuujin 2 months ago
@ikan0uchuujin You're thinking too small, I'm thinking of rather large objects, much larger than a vehicle, that take up a lot of space, but have very little mass. Much like an airship, but with light rigid materials capable of withstanding a vacuum. The inner portions of the vacuum chamber would need reinforcements on the interior to direct weight to particular load bearing locations.
This technology could open the sky as living space.
atr1337 2 months ago
@atr1337 My point was- which you missed entirely- is that air's density is so low, you'd need materials that weigh so little versus the volume they can enclose... yet be able to resist collapse against a vacuum... that it's physically impossible to do the same in air as we do in water.
The only reason we can do it in water is that water is incredibly dense versus many other materials. So it's easy to make structures that are less dense than the volume of water they displace.
ikan0uchuujin 2 months ago
@ikan0uchuujin The first supersonic jet was capable of withstanding 19 times it's own weight, this would only need to withstand about it's own weight.
atr1337 2 months ago
@atr1337 You still don't get it. You have to build a huge machine that weighs a feather but can keep out air at 15 lbs per square inch. Can you keep out air from a vacuum chamber built out of aluminium foil? A vacuum chamber that is the size of a house? No, of course not. There's no material known that would be light enough and airtight enough to do what you propose. Even carbon fiber would be too heavy.
A membrane and struts built out of diamond might do it but they'd be incredibly fragile.
ikan0uchuujin 2 months ago
@atr1337 sure, cuz it got SPEED on it. it ain't a floating mass, he's flying so fckin fast that he can sustain way heavier weights.
NingelBoy 2 weeks ago
@ikan0uchuujin
Where would you get the air to control the ship in deep space? there is none!
Good graphics but a waste of time!
sandy3721 2 months ago
if it uses air, it's no longer is an UFO anymore, it has to be antigravity. It's no air out the space...
haolovemaria 2 months ago
@haolovemaria I suppose the use of air making the craft not considered a UFO is a matter of opinion. I don't believe that UFOs operate in space. Well... Not the UFOs I'm talking about anyway, I suppose anything can be a UFO if it's flying and unidentified eh?
atr1337 2 months ago
There is a way to make a flying saucer fly without any moving parts check out flying saucers flying triangles how they fly and gravity can make a steel ball fly KEEP SEARCHING FOR THE ANSWERS
120dbdavid 2 months ago
@120dbdavid Are you sure you're not thinking of a balloon?
atr1337 2 months ago
thanks for video and Its interesting idea.But, for instance, think about a can,if you vacuum the air in the can, then it will be crushed because of pressure of air.(inner/outer pressure balance) What do you think about it?
zantanriyar 2 months ago
@zantanriyar You are welcome for the video, I enjoy making these things. I agree that an aluminum can would be crushed if it contained a vacuum, but it is only because it was not designed to contain a vacuum. If the can contained a system of rigid bars inside of it connecting each side to the other then it will be 'reinforced.' Moreover you'd probably want to construct it out of thicker aluminum or, better yet, carbon fiber which is lighter and stronger.
atr1337 2 months ago
@atr1337 Yea,you right. its reasonable explanation I think.
zantanriyar 2 months ago
yes but the craft that contains the "vacuum" will be significantly heavier than air
obalisk990 2 months ago
@obalisk990 The materials that makeup the craft will be heavier than air yes, but the because the craft contains a vacuum the entirety of the craft will 'displace' more weight in air than the craft itself weighs. Same principle as a blimp or balloon.
atr1337 2 months ago
@atr1337 so this actually works? tell me more
obalisk990 2 months ago
@obalisk990 In my opinion this probably works, but since I lack the access to proper materials and tools I have no way of constructing a physical version of this concept.
What else would you like to know about this? There's really not much to it, read about blimps and you'll probably have a good idea of how this should work. One way this tech could be kept secret is to convince people that it's far more complicated than it actually is.
atr1337 2 months ago
@atr1337 dude this absolutly would not work even in your wildest dreams creating a vacum in an object would not make it float, you realy think taking the air out of something makes it float?? even if it made the space inside lighter then air the metal the craft is made from weighs infinatly more the the amout of weight lost from air removal, what would happen however, it the air preasure on the outside would become infinatly greater then the vacume on the inside, and it would basicly implode
cybergod09 2 months ago
@cybergod09 Yawn
atr1337 2 months ago
I'm not a scientist nor a mathematician but i'm pretty sure that water and air is totally a different elements. Laws of water is different from the laws of air..
kotonizna 3 months ago
@kotonizna Actually fluid and gas dynamics are quite similar. A blimp floats in the air using the same principles that a boat floating on water uses.
atr1337 2 months ago
why has this not released to public
yudishappadoo 3 months ago
@yudishappadoo Your guess is as good as mine... Fear perhaps, fear is usually a good motivator, but generally motivates people in the wrong direction.
atr1337 2 months ago
@yudishappadoo the reason this has not been released to the public is because ITS COMPLETE CRAP!! creating a vacum in an object would not make it float, you realy think taking the air out of something makes it float?? even if it made the space inside lighter then air the metal the craft is made from weighs infinatly more the the amout of weight lost from air removal
cybergod09 2 months ago
haha a ha hahhahahahaahahhaaaa hahahahahaha aaah nice!
vespa1000turbo 3 months ago
@vespa1000turbo Glad I was able to bring some laughter into your life :)
atr1337 3 months ago
@atr1337hahahahahahahha aaaa hahahahahahahahah ohohohohohhahahahhahhahahahahh ahhahahahah aha h aahahaha fuck you !
vespa1000turbo 3 months ago
@vespa1000turbo You're laughing which indicates that you found enjoyment, but then you say "fuck you" as though you are angry. You seem confused...
atr1337 2 months ago
i love it , but i know and flow in them and designed a few.
moya138 3 months ago
@moya138 Wouldn't mind hitching a ride in something like this myself. Wouldn't be surprised if I needed an air sickness bag or something though.
atr1337 3 months ago
subway eat fresh
mcraze1000 3 months ago
@mcraze1000 Thanks for the comedic relief :)
atr1337 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Doesnt explain anything...
samurai2828 3 months ago
The problem with this idea (although kind of awesome) is that even when the craft has been voided of air and is in a state of vacuum, the craft is still denser than air due to the structure that makes it up. For a craft to gain buoyancy on/in oxygen the surface area would have to be impractically large.
bobhatesrainbows 3 months ago
Interesting interpretation, but these craft do not manipulate "air" directly, rather they manipulate the "ether" or energy field, thus they can cancel their weight and inertia...
bitterbonker 3 months ago
Your craft would never fly , try to fly with the speed of light or beyond with your vacuum device or I would rather say "vacuum cleaner"
kporwol 3 months ago
@kporwol This is not meant to fly anywhere near the speed of light. Moreover I don't think it cleans things, but I'm sure one could try.
atr1337 3 months ago
@atr1337 If you really want to build flying device I would recommend watching for instant: David Sereda - Reverse Engineered watch?v=gxmHTfHD96w
kporwol 3 months ago
You really do not understand physics at all. In order to perform right angle turns at the speeds UFOs are purported to travel at, you would have to somehow cancel inertia. Otherwise, the pilots would turn into mush and the craft would destroy itself. What you have here is a helicopter.
Figure out how matter can have its state altered so it has no mass, and then make a proposal.
ShockL0ver 3 months ago
@ShockL0ver One thing I know about people is they have a tendency to exaggerate. Obviously I believe people have seen abnormally performing aircraft, but I feel there is a good chance that many of them may have exaggerated the characteristics of the craft they saw.
atr1337 3 months ago
Je dis la même chose : comment faire de cet engin amphibie (air/eau), un vaisseau spatial ?
A mon avis, la seule façon d'échapper à la pesanteur ou attraction universelle, avec un vaisseau lourd, trouve sa solution du côté de la recherche de l'antimatière. Il y a donc encore beaucoup de recherches !
Same : how to do an amphibians ship becomes a space's one ? I'm sure there is no other solution than anti-matter using engine to do it. But till that is there many researches to conduct !
Carsfan58 3 months ago
@Carsfan58 This craft is not meant to fly in space.
Cet engin n'est pas destiné à voler dans l'espace.
atr1337 3 months ago
Je dis la même chose : comment faire de cet engin amphibie (air/eau), un vaisseau spatial ?
A mon avis, la seule façon d'échapper à la pesanteur ou attraction universelle, avec un vaisseau lourd, trouve sa solution du côté de la recherche de l'antimatière. Il y a donc encore beaucoup de recherches !
Same : how to do an amphibians ship becomes a space's one ? I'm sure there is no other solution than anti-matter using engine to do it. But till that is there many researches !
persiste 58
Carsfan58 3 months ago
All good you think.....but there is no air in space so how did the space ship get here in the first place?
blackls400 3 months ago
@blackls400 I believe this is man made technology and does not actually operate in space.
atr1337 3 months ago
@blackls400 Very Good i'm glad someone like you has a bit of brains this video is bullshit.UFOs are a lot more high tech than that.They have mastered time where there is no friction by warping time.
CosmicCelestial 3 months ago
This video is full of shit.This theory won't work.
CosmicCelestial 3 months ago
your UFO is to noisy to many people claim to hear nothing (no sound ) explain
Asus1133 3 months ago
@Asus1133 Well I think there are a number of ways to solve that problem. For starters, when the craft is simply hovering it would make no noise at all. As for when the pumps or engine are operating I believe boeing has proven that one can drastically reduce the sound foot print by simply calculating the curves of the intake/exhaust properly. In addition to that the military has been able to produce virtually silent helicopters using sound cancellation technology.
atr1337 3 months ago
submarines float when they dont have water in them because of displacement it works because water is much hevier than air
cH33zewarri0r 3 months ago
@cH33zewarri0r Actually it's both, buoyancy and displacement are related. For instance a solid chunk of metal will sink, where a log of wood of the same weight will float because it is less dense. The wood has the same weight of the metal, but it is larger and thus displaces more water than it weighs. The point is that a sub does not float because air "puses up" on the ballast tanks.
atr1337 3 months ago
What an absolute crock. Regardless of there being air or a vacuum being in the supposed "chambers", the physical weight of the ship has to be less than tng yourhat of the surrounding a ir for gravity to loose its effect on the saucer. Just because you can make fancy graphics, a scientifically astute individual this does not make. Please stop wasting your as well as our time with your poorly thought out theories, Thank you.
houtsnijer 3 months ago
@houtsnijer I hear your concerns and I'm sure you'll be glad to know that there is plenty more where this came from. :D
atr1337 3 months ago
So why are UFO'S round like a suacer instead of shaped like a submarine. and why arnt submarines shaped like a UFO?
Asus1133 3 months ago
@Asus1133 Submarines are not all of the same shape, personally I believe the ones with a saucer shape are classified and use the technology in this video. As for UFOs, they also come in a variety of shapes I believe. I've seen reports allegedly from pilots who have seen cigar shaped UFOs. The typical military submarine seems to have a cigar shape.
atr1337 3 months ago
oh btw this idea sound crafty but donst work.. in a submerine the ir in the ballest pushes up ..this idea doesnt carry to your example either air or vacum nothing outpushes the weiht of the craft.. also air cant be rought from below like that
your graphics and display are good here on the video keep thinking :)
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 The ballast tanks in a sub do not push up, their purpose is to change the density of the submarine's contents. The ballast tank is more dense when it is full of water vs when it is not. That's how buoyancy works, it's based on density. Same principle with a vacuum. A vacuum is less dense than air and therefore the craft becomes buoyant when the air is removed.
At any rate I agree that UFOs are not alien technology.
atr1337 3 months ago
@frank0067 I've discussed the air intake on the bottom before and believe it would work perfectly well, especially since the craft would be in motion when the air is brought in. For instance an F-16's intake is mounted on the bottom of the craft. Nonetheless if you still don't like the idea of the intake being on the bottom then you could simply move the intake to the top and exhaust to the bottom.
atr1337 3 months ago
i would say i hate to break your bubble on UFO.. but i dont...
i been around the subject mnore than 23 years... UFO either means nothing or a new world relgion ... there is no such thing as aliens
The government is trying hard with the media to sell and promote alien belife everywhere.
frank0067 3 months ago
I think you have mildly over-simplified this. Although this is a feasible new means of transportation, this construction is definitely not what is normally associated with UFOs. This is a good demonstration of engineering and i agree with your question: "why hasn't this been introduced to the public?" I think the original "ufo" construction uses actual anti-gravity propulsion and nikola tesla's technology
renewtherepublic 3 months ago
@renewtherepublic Although the two of us disagree whether this is the actual technology behind UFOs or not, I'm glad to see that you're out there using your head and coming up with your own opinions. I 'believe' this is the tech behind the ufo phenomena, but truly neither of us will know for sure what type of technology they use until we "get behind the wheel" of one.
atr1337 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is an idiot!
davmus12 3 months ago
Sorry meant @atr1337
JoeBMiller97 3 months ago
@JoeBMiller97 I know it won't fly in space, but thanks for reminding me. The intake for the engine is on the bottom of the craft. The vacuum pump intake/exhaust is along the rim of the craft.
It is indeed an advanced airship/blimp, the only way to make an airship super sonic is to make the shell of the craft rigid. Traveling fast would rip a regular blimp to pieces. As long as you're making a rigid craft you might as well utilize a vacuum for it's superior lifting capability.
atr1337 3 months ago
@eason3, this is clearly not a craft that would fly in space with whats shown in this video. The most it is is, as I said, an advanced blimp. And blimps dont go into space my freind.
JoeBMiller97 3 months ago
very ineresting idea, its basicly aadvanced blimp and it would have no posibility of going of planet, but very interesting. also where is the intake for the jets?
JoeBMiller97 3 months ago
Saucer craft work off of the premise of electromagnetics where there is a separation of positive and negative flow of electrons around the exterior of the craft. The air float type design there is ridiculous.
eason3 3 months ago
@eason3 You know what I find funny? I don't even care how UFOs work and yet here I am with this video. There are many people out there who have waited their whole life to find out the truth behind UFOs, put it right in front of their faces and many of them deny it because they refuse the accept that they've been had by what amounts to little more than a clever parlor trick.
You're not going to make it anywhere in life by refusing the truth just to save yourself a bit of humiliation.
atr1337 3 months ago
where are they going to get air in space?
miguelazue95 3 months ago
Since it is so easy,why hasn't half of the youtube made it already?
MSDjMichaelSlash 3 months ago
@MSDjMichaelSlash For starters it's probably quite expensive, I mean carbon fiber isn't exactly the cheapest material around. In addition to that, although I couldn't say for sure, I do not think that half of YouTube's viewers have seen this video.
atr1337 3 months ago
Nice design, it kinda has a similar concept to a helium balloon too. I say it may work as a unmanned aircraft. You won't be able to stuff someone in there basically because there was no allocated space. It won't be able to tilt and spin at the same time which may mean that it'll be unstable.
AaronKSLee 4 months ago
@AaronKSLee You know I never considered the possibility that someone might want to tilt and spin at the same time, off the top of my head I can't think of a reason as to why someone would want to.
Although the design presented in my video does not allow for passenger space I believe that this technology can manifest with a number of designs some of which allow for passenger space.
atr1337 3 months ago
absolute,pure B.S.!!
anthrapoid10 4 months ago
This is absolute nonsense. Fundamentally forgetting the air above the craft pushing it down to earth.
A reactionless drive is the only way it could fly as this would not rely on air.
This craft wouldn't be able to fly in space, because there is no air in space. Which does defeat the object when it comes to building a space craft.
novata01 4 months ago
@novata01 You are correct that this craft would not likely fly in space, however; I feel your assertion regarding the air pushing it down to be misleading. Air has weight to it yes and the air above the craft will be pushing it down, just like on any craft. The point is that the air inside the craft also has weight and pushes the craft down, by removing that air we remove that weight and the pushing force it exerts on the craft, that's how it is made lighter.
atr1337 4 months ago
@atr1337 Good point. Air does have a weight, or MASS, and so does the craft. It is almost as if you are saying that a vaccuum would fly because a vaccuum is nothing and nothing has no mass, is this correct? If I have a container and I successfully remove all of the air from it, I have only removed the mass of the air, not the mass of the container, or craft.
novata01 3 months ago
@novata01 Let's say you have a sealed container with air in it. The materials of the container weigh 10lbs and the air inside weighs 8lbs, the entirety of the container is 18lbs. Remove the air and now the container weighs 10lbs.
atr1337 3 months ago
@novata01 If you have a craft that displaces 4500lbs of air, the craft's constructing materials weigh 3000lbs and the air in the craft weighs 2000lbs for a total craft weight of 5000lbs it will sit on the ground like a rock. Remove the 2000lbs of air inside the craft and the total craft weight is now 3000lbs which is less than the 4500lbs of air it displaces, making it lighter than the amount of air that would otherwise occupy it's space.
atr1337 3 months ago
@novata01 he's saying that this will dramatically cut down on the craft's weight making high maneuverability possible. The propulsion is created by the air flow over the top which creates lower pressure just like aircraft wings. In theory, this will be enough to counteract the remaining weight.
renewtherepublic 3 months ago
yes there is something lighter than air, its called hydrogen :P
johnnyartillery 4 months ago
Nice design but:
It wont work, simply because you just cant put any one in it. It's based on revolution and no one could withstand the amount of G's it generates and require just to stay in flight, even worse if it has to make a quick turn. Surf the web, the army already tried your design and it failed just because of that reason. That technology works with air not sure for water. Another problem is that tehcnology cant work in the vacuum of space. So no, Ufo's dont use that technology.
nextdeath22 4 months ago
@nextdeath22 This craft is not based on revolution I don't think, perhaps you could explain what you mean when you say it's based on revolution. The pumps have revolving elements yes, but the hole craft does not continuously revolve, just like a helicopter's blades rotate, but the helicopter's hull only rotates when the pilot commands it to.
As far as the army's tests, I am unaware of any such test, perhaps you'd be willing to mention what phrases I should search to find this information.
atr1337 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are all wrong, You are looking for answer too far way.they are right under your nose
fffffffffffffffff927 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ha , ha , ha...!!!
MrProtopopescu 4 months ago
The video sucks , the music sucks , and his stupid idiotic technology wannabe sucks even more !
MrChristopher1213 4 months ago
@MrChristopher1213 It has been said that you know you're on to something when you start pissin' people off. I must be really on to something then.
BTW, you speak like a person that is afraid that they've contributed nothing of their own to the world, so you try to make the contributions of others look poor in order to take attention away from your own lack of contribution.
atr1337 4 months ago
Physics 101:
Consider an empty Boeing 747. As a cylinder, it obviously DISPLACES more air than the shape of your design. It weights approx. 400,000 lbs. The volume of its cabin is 34,000 cubic feet. That much air weights around 2,750 lbs. Now, Archimedes would tell us that if we evacuated all that air from the cabin, the 747 would still weight...397,250 lbs!!! AND that bitch is made out of aluminum! A light material with comparable mass to carbon fiber. So now do you understand my thermos joke?
2011timmyt 4 months ago
While you are correct in assuming lighter building material would compensate, matter-ial itself cannot negate mass. So as good as his calculations are, the notion of near zero-mass building-material makes even his design impractical in the physical world. Also it should be noted: his design calls for a spherical shape to maximize volume. Even if vacuum buoyancy were possible, your design here is grossly lacking the necessary volume needed, even to come close. Even so, don't stop believing!!!!
2011timmyt 4 months ago
@2011timmyt Nothing is 'negating' mass in this design. You're talking about the mass of the individual components, but it is the mass of the ship as a whole that is taken into account here. The whole ship including the air in it, has mass, if you remove the air you are removing mass from the whole ship.
A fully loaded airplane has mass, unload that airplane and it's mass decreases.
atr1337 4 months ago
@2011timmyt Also, it seems to me that the oval shape in my video would work perfectly fine, in fact better for stability purposes. If you were using a sphere it might turn end over end because there is nothing to stop it from doing so.
atr1337 4 months ago
ok dude, I found someone else on the internet who describes vacuum buoyancy WITH mathematical notation! he indeed shows that a vacuum ship with a large enough diameter will become buoyant while resisting collapse. HOWEVER, in even his equations he fails to recognize that weight and size are proportional, meaning in his theoretical vacuum ship, he completely ignores its weight-increase by omitting mass from his equations. (when you omit a variable in an equation, you are assuming it is constant.)
2011timmyt 4 months ago
funny lol lmao lol
skunkape49 4 months ago
Check this out:
atr1337 4 months ago
there is no air in space?
Iseekoutthetruth 4 months ago
okay now explain how the craft are capable of braking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom. also your description assumes that the craft is weightless to begin with, it isn't. how does it float in air? the vacuum will only remove the weight of air not the weight of the craft.
jdrury 4 months ago
sorry but that is to simple,that is how we would make it but a spaceship no it more complex then that for instances you need a full under standing of emf gratify drive, giro a hell of a lot of electricity power to sum it op
mackavally 4 months ago
If i make a partial vacuum in a carbon fibre tank.. will it float? what say you?
rajababu1982 4 months ago
@rajababu1982 Depends on the size of the tank. I can say, though, that carbon fiber tank will weigh less when it contains a partial vacuum compared to containing a full dose of air.
atr1337 4 months ago
these vacuums would make an amazing amount of sound and from all UFO witness interview videos.. the said ther was no sound from them?
alexfelldownawell 4 months ago
@alexfelldownawell While floating this craft would not make use of it's vacuum pumps unless traveling vertically. And even then one could probably overcome the sound issue with modern sound suppression technology.
atr1337 4 months ago
@alexfelldownawell in videos of ufo's flying trough clouds ther is no movement of the clouds, with the power of the air coming from that would clearly blow them atleast a small bit out of place....
alexfelldownawell 4 months ago
How interesting to understand this.
moya138 4 months ago
If you remove 500 cubic feet of air from your aircraft, you will only lighten the load by 40 lbs., while the reinforcement necessary to withstand the air pressure outside from crushing your ship to a pancake, will add hundreds of lbs. In other words, your ship will need to be very heavy, in order to lose very little weight.
doceigen 4 months ago
@doceigen That's not unheard of to make a craft of larger size, the Hindenburg had over 7000000 ft³ capacity
atr1337 4 months ago
@atr1337 Yes, of course, but its skin would have crushed!, if the hydrogen gas inside it was not kept pretty similar to the air pressure out of it... same thing with helium craft, and hot air balloons... relatively small differential pressures between outside and inside. Example: The ISS weighs nearly a million lbs.!, most of it structural.
doceigen 4 months ago
@atr1337 I agree with doceigen, friend, you have no idea how large the force air pressure from outside can be. Hindenburg is filled with hydrogen just to ensure inside have same pressure with outside, so it will not crush. Watch MythBuster please, a floating balloon built with lead is the maximum thing can be done. Currently there is no any type of material is light and strong at the same time that can be used in this way.
LeeIongi 4 months ago