Atomic fly by

[beethovens666]

Nucleus too big

[LoboOscuro3]

Cual es la gracia? no entendi el video.

[Noureldinbassem]

is that a ''He''' Atom?

[GaseousNobility]

Is that a deuterium atom? I saw two particles in the core. Also, yay, someone on YouTube who's actually intelligent! I am happy :D

[TheEnjima]

Scale is a bit out isn't it but good educational vid

[ExNihiloJimmy]

Where be the HD ?

[irephelippehc]

Eu escrevo em português por que é a lingua que eu falo... e, já que eu tenho que compreender o que os outros falam em inglês, porque os outros não podem se esforçar em compreender o português??!!

Não me julguem pela lingua que estou escrevendo, mas pelo conteúdo que contém!!

[rcadosreisferreira]

Cool effect, how do you make it. With particles or lines or so?

[jimmyloui]

wow..is actually the case?

[irephelippehc]

thereasonwhyguy está correto... o átomo se parece muito mais com uma nuvem difusa, os elétrons não são bolinhas deterministicas, mas estão distribuidos em suas órbitas!!!

e as orbitas também não são anéis como mostra a animação!!!

OS ELÉTRONS NÃO SÃO BOLINHAS!!

[Antiunfunktasticize]

Ok, why not say it in English?

Everyone here is speaking English and if you can't understand you can damn well explain what you want to in English. No need to show off that you can speak another language, I can speak Portuguese too, but I don't because:

1 - The language is crap

and 2 - because if I want to get a point across, I say it in whatever language the other person speaks. Or else I'm just talking to myself.

And I know that you can speak English because you comment made sense here.

[ArtofericJames]

Not a bad idea. I think I may try that...

[coollord300]

try adding sound to the new nova shockwave like you did to this one

[tangywangie]

i believe that the big bang theory has something to do with albert einstein

yes.

[tangywangie]

i believe the big bang theory has something to do with albert einstein.

[PlaystationSkater]

cool

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

nice

fyi

electrons don't have orbits like that

[PlaystationSkater]

no one really knows how they orbit

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

The key thing to remember is that electrons are very unpredictable.

So there orbits would not be so orderly.

[PlaystationSkater]

exactly

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

Saying ,"exactly", clearly demonstraits that you have no idea what I was saying.

There orbits wouldn't be organized, simply because an electrons position is probabilistic and not deterministic.

So its path would change without any known cause. Which would mean that the wouldn't have orbital rings.

[PlaystationSkater]

they do have orbital rings (aka energy levels) but the electrons r constantly jumping between the different levels

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

The "energy levels" are at different distances from the nucleus not on different  set orbital rings.

[phj1990]

1. Elektrons do not orbit the chore in circles. They exist as waves, making a bound system that creates an orbitAL. Their positions are undetermined until a measurement is performed: the wavefunction collapses and the probability of finding it a distance r from the chore is psi*(r)psi(r).

2. They never have to "jump" to different parts of an orbital, because they exhibit wave properties.

3. The different distances are in fact different orbitals, but they are further away for higher levels.

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

Ok...

I was referring to the bullshit I read when I was younger.

Quantum physics...

[tnzfki]

they have no orbital rings but energy lvls there is a difference

there are just electron clouds with a higher chance for electron to be in :p

(hard to explain on a foreign language)

[CharlesACarroll3]

very cool

[bestintheworld3]

NICE!!!