This is the 1929 sound version with the sound taken out and redubbed. Check out the Ultimate Edition from Milestone. It has both the 1925 and 1929 (sound and redubbed) versions.
There is a popular misconception in this country that blood and gore are essential for a great horror film. While that stuff may be horrific, it is not necessarily horror. I think that mood and setting make for an ideal horror film. Take a look at F.W. Murnau's impressionistic masterpiece, Nosferatu. That film is as creepy and scary (possibly more soI as any modern horror film. Count Orlock chills the blood. He really freaks me out. Count Orlock is a nightmare. Jason is just a guy w/blade.
Regarding Chaney's make-up, this man truly suffered for his art. I'd read that he could only wear the aforementioned wires for minutes at a time due to the pain they caused him. Then there's the canine teeth he wore in London After Midnight that caused him pain as well. Reportedly, his suffering led to the establishment of stipulations forbidding the use of make-up techniques that were physically painful in films made in the United States..
Love PHANTOM? Don't want to a see a nonsensical sequel in which Raoul becomes a drunkard, Meg becomes a murderer, Christine becomes a slut and the Phantom becomes a composer of trashy vaudeville?
You're not alone.
Visit LoveShouldDie [dot] com to find out the awful truth behind the non-awaited sequel, denounced by the estate of PHANTOM's original author, condemned by PHANTOM fans everywhere and ridiculed by the international press.
My new goal in life is to revive horror films like this. Not necessarily remake them, just film new monster movies in black and white and make people in the audiences faint once again, just like they did back in the day. To me it's not about the money. It's about the entertainment and quality.
Jacob Whitley, Tyler Dean, and Aisa Estelle will be starting a new youtube collaboration dedicated to the horror genre of film. Three times a week they will be appearing to blog, review films (recent and old), and talk about different aspects of the horror community. Tyler Dean will be on Monday. Jacob Whitley will be on Wednesday, and Aisa Estelle will be on Friday. Be one of the first to subscribe to this awesome new channel and dont miss out on the action.
Took my nephew to see this last summer. It was part of a Universal film series showing at historic theater. Despite the chuckles thoughout the film, this scene drew several loud gasps and a couple of shocked outbursts. After all these years Chaney's power is undeniable
Many Halloween showings of this film across the world this year! Follow @fantomedelopera on Twitter for all the latest updates on special screenings and other PHANTOM OF THE OPERA related news.
No modern Gore and Splatter, no effect can compete with a true master. Lon Chaney scares the shit out of me, I guess I sleep with the lights on tonight :) His interpretation of the Hunchback of Notre Dame and the Phantom of the Opera are true greatness. Just look at that man's face, so much expression and creepyness!
@futuremodal New to this thread, so late in posting this. But that wasn't Lon Chaney, it was Charles Laughton in the 1936 version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. He did this so the fake eye in the distorted side of his face would move in unison with his real eye.
This was the first appearance of the phantom's face. Chaney's makeup as the phantom becomes progressively creepier throughout the movie. He did this so audiences wouldn't become accustomed to the Phantom's looks.
I remember my Papa (grandfather) would tell me about when he saw this film for the first time in theaters, and how scary it was. Truly Lon Chaney, Sr. is perhaps the greatest actor of both the silent film era and the 20th century.
Yes he did. I can't remember the title of the film but he played a midget character by literally bending his legs with cup like suctions on his knees that did some damage to his legs. He also used his feet in phenomenal ways in 'The Unknown'.
The man of a thousand faces. And he did it all with a simple tool box.
It's an interesting thought that people MUST have screamed when this happened. Nowaday's I don't think I EVER hear people scream at scarry movies. Well, accept myself, lol!
I watched this entire film not too long ago, and although I dislike most of it (the "acting" back then was pretty comical and hard to sit through, not to mention the ending), Lon Cheney was and shall remain AWESOME. The fact that his Phantom can still scare people, decades upon decades later, is a pretty good testament to his talent and to the talent of the make-up artists. :)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If only people would read Gaston Leroux's 1910 novel "Le Fantôme de l'Opéra" instead of this plagiarized filth! That is what The Phantom of the Opera is supposed to be.
Or maybe George du Maurier's "Trilby" which the book was inspired by...
I actually just finished reading the book, and I thought it was fantastic. No movie (or musical) has been able to perfectly capture the greatness of that novel! The Lon Chaney version comes the closest though.
God, can you imagine how those 1925 filmgoers must have reacted when they saw that? What I wouldn't give for the chance to have been at the back of that old theatre and watch them hit the roof.
@Basssinger86 They did! In fact it was so common for the women to faint during the unmasking scene, that theatres had to carry some kind of smelling salt to wake them up xD
There have been a lot of comments here about how the Phantom's face is scary. Well, it sort of is, but I've met a lot of people who have been disfigured or born with defects, and NONE of them present the scary presence that Cheney's Phantom does. He managed to combine the unnatractive with the malevolent in a way that I think no one has done since (maybe Heath Ledger?)
I remember seeing this movie and scene when I was a little girl. It totally FREAKED ME OUT !!!!!! I always felt so sorry for the Phantom, and wanted him to get the girl.
They have tried to remake this story many, many times, but they will NEVER come close to the original silent version with the great LON CHANEY !!!!!!!! If you can, get/buy a copy (DVD or Video) of this original silent version.....and watch his HANDS all the way through the movie.
Lon Chaney is just brilliant Phantom. When I first saw this movie I was speechless. He was excatly that Phantom which I had always imagined. He's awesome actor \^^/
Fantastic pick!! Chaney was such a legendary actor, when actors really had to ACT. Silent films are a great example of the physical artistry that actors should possess. I'd like to see TOM CRUISE OR PARIS HILTON show true acting talent like this!
the last copy of the film was destroyed in a fire in an MGM vault in the 1960's, it's such a shame, that movie looks like an awesome thriller, which we may never get a chance to see
This must be one of the most powerful moments in the history of cinema. Great acting, great music, great movie. To put it bluntly -- it's a masterpiece.
I'm glad someone posted this it is a classic and ultimaaltely amazing. I love Lon Chaney and this movie all together it caputured Gaston Leroux's book to perfection
He wasn't a burn victim, but he was known as the "Man of a Thousand Faces" due to his extensive and intricate makeup techniques. For example, he achieved the nose of the Phantom here with a strip of fish skin and (I believe) some spirit gum to lift the nose up to expose the nostrils.
Actually no. He didnt do that. He used a material called Fish Skin and pulled it back to his forehead. He also used a putty, or however you spell it, on his cheek bones to make it appear more "sunken in" like a dead person.
actually according to this book i have about classic horror and thriller movies and the 100 scariest movie moments on bravo, all ive ever heard is that he used paino wire to achieve the skull nose
Check out this book called "Lon Chaney: Man of a Thousand Faces". Its by a guy named Blake...Im not sure of his first name but its a biography on Chaney and the author explains a pretty good bit of his make up techniques.
One of my favorite scenes from this film. It's funny, even though I KNOW what's going to happen, I'm always like, "No, no, Christine, don't do it"--she rips the mask off--"What the heck?! No she DIDN'T!"
Great video, thanks for uploading. Lon Chaney's Erik rules. Now, if we could only somehow find a Phantom who could have the face Chaney used and Michael Crawford's voice . . .
I had the DVD with the original score and the original colors it was an awosme DVD. I'll have to buy a new one though, cause I have no idea where it is.
That's how I think. But that face IS scary, all by itself. But the musical shows him as tragic romantic figure which is better --though I prefer sexy Antonio Banderas as the phantom to Michael Crawford, whom I liked in Hello Dolly!
Get a look at my title piece featuring Lon in "The Penalty."
*Christine removes the mask*
Phantom: DEEEEEEEERP!
Christine: Aah!
Phantom: *points* DUUUUURRRRR
DramaMajor713 5 months ago
That was fucking dramatic.
OzzyMandez 8 months ago 2
This is the 1929 sound version with the sound taken out and redubbed. Check out the Ultimate Edition from Milestone. It has both the 1925 and 1929 (sound and redubbed) versions.
Valagnar 9 months ago
how beautiful.
spankbandit 9 months ago 5
Horror novel see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
1:55 , he looks like the evil-monkey in family guy :)
xXTNoeXx 11 months ago 4
There is a popular misconception in this country that blood and gore are essential for a great horror film. While that stuff may be horrific, it is not necessarily horror. I think that mood and setting make for an ideal horror film. Take a look at F.W. Murnau's impressionistic masterpiece, Nosferatu. That film is as creepy and scary (possibly more soI as any modern horror film. Count Orlock chills the blood. He really freaks me out. Count Orlock is a nightmare. Jason is just a guy w/blade.
whitshade 1 year ago 8
Regarding Chaney's make-up, this man truly suffered for his art. I'd read that he could only wear the aforementioned wires for minutes at a time due to the pain they caused him. Then there's the canine teeth he wore in London After Midnight that caused him pain as well. Reportedly, his suffering led to the establishment of stipulations forbidding the use of make-up techniques that were physically painful in films made in the United States..
whitshade 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Love PHANTOM? Don't want to a see a nonsensical sequel in which Raoul becomes a drunkard, Meg becomes a murderer, Christine becomes a slut and the Phantom becomes a composer of trashy vaudeville?
You're not alone.
Visit LoveShouldDie [dot] com to find out the awful truth behind the non-awaited sequel, denounced by the estate of PHANTOM's original author, condemned by PHANTOM fans everywhere and ridiculed by the international press.
LoveShouldDie 1 year ago
My new goal in life is to revive horror films like this. Not necessarily remake them, just film new monster movies in black and white and make people in the audiences faint once again, just like they did back in the day. To me it's not about the money. It's about the entertainment and quality.
EpicOberon 1 year ago
Mr. Chaney was a genius. He developed his own makeup & efx
jdmitchell2 1 year ago
Great scene! I mention Chaney in The Celebrity Song.
superdavid002 1 year ago
Jacob Whitley, Tyler Dean, and Aisa Estelle will be starting a new youtube collaboration dedicated to the horror genre of film. Three times a week they will be appearing to blog, review films (recent and old), and talk about different aspects of the horror community. Tyler Dean will be on Monday. Jacob Whitley will be on Wednesday, and Aisa Estelle will be on Friday. Be one of the first to subscribe to this awesome new channel and dont miss out on the action.
KingsOfScreams 1 year ago
see, i never relized what a whimp christine was. jesus, its creepy but not that bad. worse things have happened to people
SuicidalMickeyMouse3 1 year ago
this is my kind of horror film.
todays movies suck.
this one was a good one.
so was Nosferatu and Night of the Living Dead, the 1968 version.
elfidox2 2 years ago 2
Took my nephew to see this last summer. It was part of a Universal film series showing at historic theater. Despite the chuckles thoughout the film, this scene drew several loud gasps and a couple of shocked outbursts. After all these years Chaney's power is undeniable
tabbygail7 2 years ago 2
ok.....
that was kinda creepy
fire2faith 2 years ago 2
Ilove this
RebelOntheRoad 2 years ago
What's the best transfer of this movie?
angeltosome 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Many Halloween showings of this film across the world this year! Follow @fantomedelopera on Twitter for all the latest updates on special screenings and other PHANTOM OF THE OPERA related news.
fantomedelopera100 2 years ago
I read somewhere that Lon Chaney made small loops of piano wire, stuck them in his eye sockets, and ever so slightly pulled his eyeballs forward.
A true dedicated professional, not like today's crop of pansey actors.
futuremodal 2 years ago 44
You said it!
SirHoliday12 2 years ago
@futuremodal Very True. He also used some form of wire apparatus in order for his nose to be upturned in such a grotesque manner.
For all of the time you see him on-screen. Chaney, apparently, was in excruciating pain from the torturous make-up routine.
Legend.
TokyoXplorer 1 year ago
@TokyoXplorer Yeah... being insane is such a good personal trait.
hl2og 1 year ago
@futuremodal
No modern Gore and Splatter, no effect can compete with a true master. Lon Chaney scares the shit out of me, I guess I sleep with the lights on tonight :) His interpretation of the Hunchback of Notre Dame and the Phantom of the Opera are true greatness. Just look at that man's face, so much expression and creepyness!
ZoltepZaan 1 year ago
@futuremodal Yes, that and the same wire around his head to pull his nose up, making it look skeletal. He was a master of makeup.
juggalojack13 1 year ago
@futuremodal was that before or after he went blind?
artwel123 7 months ago
@futuremodal New to this thread, so late in posting this. But that wasn't Lon Chaney, it was Charles Laughton in the 1936 version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. He did this so the fake eye in the distorted side of his face would move in unison with his real eye.
yvettegr 7 months ago
oh yes it was!
ReviewCam 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that wasnt scary!
italirishxoxo 2 years ago
OMG!! Lon Chaney doesn't even have to wear makeup for that!!
Compaired to todays movie (2004) and stage version, :P
beccaboo10101 2 years ago
they should make a spoof out of this.. just like that dramatic chipmunk. well they don't have too because this is already old.
WhiteKnighT161 2 years ago
While today's standards the Phantom makeup isn't that creepy, for 1925 audiences it sure was. They had never really seen that before.
joe789987 2 years ago 3
great movie!
156gbe56 2 years ago 2
His face isen't really that ugly like some of the other ones.
brookeiorio 2 years ago
This was the first appearance of the phantom's face. Chaney's makeup as the phantom becomes progressively creepier throughout the movie. He did this so audiences wouldn't become accustomed to the Phantom's looks.
Extratexture4 2 years ago 2
wow, kinda scary. This Christine is very pretty!
AmyTWILIGHTER 2 years ago
Lolz @ 1:48!
188 2 years ago
He looks part chimpanzee or something.
nerdelicious5 2 years ago 4
can you send me this version? the full film?
xxkewldudexx 2 years ago
I remember my Papa (grandfather) would tell me about when he saw this film for the first time in theaters, and how scary it was. Truly Lon Chaney, Sr. is perhaps the greatest actor of both the silent film era and the 20th century.
lordkremlore 2 years ago 8
He also did his own make-up and the stunts in the hunchback of notre dame
KiwamuTheKappa 2 years ago 2
Yes he did. I can't remember the title of the film but he played a midget character by literally bending his legs with cup like suctions on his knees that did some damage to his legs. He also used his feet in phenomenal ways in 'The Unknown'.
The man of a thousand faces. And he did it all with a simple tool box.
lordkremlore 2 years ago
The film is "The Penalty," in which he plays a man with amputated legs. The effect is amazing, and totally without camera tricks.
In "The Unknown," a real amputee doubled him for some of the tricks he did with his feet.
Extratexture4 2 years ago
From what I've heard he did the tricks by himself.
lordkremlore 2 years ago
The documentary, "Lon Chaney: Man of a Thousand Faces," states that Chaney often used doubles, and points out several examples.
Extratexture4 2 years ago
Been a while since I've watched the documentary that was included with the TCM Archives collection so I'll take your work for it.
lordkremlore 2 years ago
His own make-up, yes. But he did use stunt doubles for very dangerous or difficult actions.
Extratexture4 2 years ago
It's an interesting thought that people MUST have screamed when this happened. Nowaday's I don't think I EVER hear people scream at scarry movies. Well, accept myself, lol!
AkiraChan24 3 years ago 9
I watched this entire film not too long ago, and although I dislike most of it (the "acting" back then was pretty comical and hard to sit through, not to mention the ending), Lon Cheney was and shall remain AWESOME. The fact that his Phantom can still scare people, decades upon decades later, is a pretty good testament to his talent and to the talent of the make-up artists. :)
AleezaChocolat 3 years ago
Then you would have to thank Lon once again - because he did all of the makeup in his career, including his makeup for the role of Erik, the Phantom.
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If only people would watch THIS instead of Webber's plagiarized filth! This is what The Phantom of the Opera is supposed to be.
LeBossuFantome 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If only people would read Gaston Leroux's 1910 novel "Le Fantôme de l'Opéra" instead of this plagiarized filth! That is what The Phantom of the Opera is supposed to be.
Or maybe George du Maurier's "Trilby" which the book was inspired by...
robertllynch 3 years ago
Too late. I've read both. Five times each.
LeBossuFantome 3 years ago
I actually just finished reading the book, and I thought it was fantastic. No movie (or musical) has been able to perfectly capture the greatness of that novel! The Lon Chaney version comes the closest though.
RupertMass 2 years ago 3
God, can you imagine how those 1925 filmgoers must have reacted when they saw that? What I wouldn't give for the chance to have been at the back of that old theatre and watch them hit the roof.
Decepticonx7 3 years ago 3
I heard woman actually fainted after seeing it in theaters.
Basssinger86 3 years ago 43
Yes, they did. Actually, theaters were required to keep smeeling salts for the women who fainted during this scene!
POTOPhan13 2 years ago 4
@Basssinger86 They did! In fact it was so common for the women to faint during the unmasking scene, that theatres had to carry some kind of smelling salt to wake them up xD
CaptLiHellsing 1 month ago
I didn't see this version. I saw the real original 1925 PotO.
Even though I've already seen it, it still takes my breath away when I see Chaney unmasked.
I'm not fond of most old movies, but this is my most favorite PotO version.
Crunchbite14 3 years ago 2
I would shit my pants in 1925. haha
PapagenoJuan 3 years ago
Just imagine being in the audience in 1925 with this scene coming up, and the audience along with you, *chills*
Freebleeper 3 years ago
There have been a lot of comments here about how the Phantom's face is scary. Well, it sort of is, but I've met a lot of people who have been disfigured or born with defects, and NONE of them present the scary presence that Cheney's Phantom does. He managed to combine the unnatractive with the malevolent in a way that I think no one has done since (maybe Heath Ledger?)
This scene scared the crap out me as a kid!
jfulbright 3 years ago 3
same as
rayblack2004 3 years ago
Mary Philbin was such a beauty.
ChristineDaaePhan07 3 years ago 3
I remember seeing this movie and scene when I was a little girl. It totally FREAKED ME OUT !!!!!! I always felt so sorry for the Phantom, and wanted him to get the girl.
They have tried to remake this story many, many times, but they will NEVER come close to the original silent version with the great LON CHANEY !!!!!!!! If you can, get/buy a copy (DVD or Video) of this original silent version.....and watch his HANDS all the way through the movie.
Classic !!!!!!!!! Lon ROCKS !!!!!!!
blondiebanjo007 3 years ago
Ooh, he looks really scary without his mask! :O
mixMartina 3 years ago
Silent film actors were so greatly expressive... =O
Johnny123456789x 3 years ago 4
They had to be.
They look so corny though! lol
oohcool 3 years ago
Lon Chaney = Best actor of all of cinema history!
This movie actually scared me. I'm glad to have recorded this off of TCM a few Halloweens ago.
JeredRLacks 3 years ago 7
lon chaney ,boris karloff,peter cushing ,the stuff nightmares are made of!
harlan1988 3 years ago 7
Lon Chaney is just brilliant Phantom. When I first saw this movie I was speechless. He was excatly that Phantom which I had always imagined. He's awesome actor \^^/
Valentinwar90 3 years ago 5
Fantastic pick!! Chaney was such a legendary actor, when actors really had to ACT. Silent films are a great example of the physical artistry that actors should possess. I'd like to see TOM CRUISE OR PARIS HILTON show true acting talent like this!
undergroundmr 3 years ago 5
paris Hilton can't even act with sound.
hazellwood 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I find it amazing he is related to Dick Cheney and Barack Obama
nobodysperfect06 4 years ago
S.C.A.R.Y.
...but amazing!
g4yozlykMAYO 4 years ago 2
Now THIS is Erik.
aurorlupin 4 years ago 9
Now THIS is Erik.
aurorlupin 4 years ago 9
Get the DVD of this movie. Although no spoken dialogue, beautiful music and acting by Chaney and Philbin.
hotwriter36 4 years ago 3
too bad London After Midnight is lost forever
nobodysperfect06 4 years ago 5
How did that happen?
DraxZombie 3 years ago
the last copy of the film was destroyed in a fire in an MGM vault in the 1960's, it's such a shame, that movie looks like an awesome thriller, which we may never get a chance to see
nobodysperfect06 3 years ago
This must be one of the most powerful moments in the history of cinema. Great acting, great music, great movie. To put it bluntly -- it's a masterpiece.
angerismymiddlename 4 years ago 4
lol you retard that wasn't Lon Cheney Sr.'s real face, he was a makeup GENIUS
bluecollarteen 4 years ago 4
I'm glad someone posted this it is a classic and ultimaaltely amazing. I love Lon Chaney and this movie all together it caputured Gaston Leroux's book to perfection
eriklivesoninme 4 years ago 3
He wasn't a burn victim, but he was known as the "Man of a Thousand Faces" due to his extensive and intricate makeup techniques. For example, he achieved the nose of the Phantom here with a strip of fish skin and (I believe) some spirit gum to lift the nose up to expose the nostrils.
Ryushinku 4 years ago 2
Actually the way he got his nose like that was with a piano string, he tightened it until he thought it looked like a skull's nose socket.
slimmdogg2968 4 years ago
however he did it, it sounds painful.
ChantantReve 4 years ago
Actually no. He didnt do that. He used a material called Fish Skin and pulled it back to his forehead. He also used a putty, or however you spell it, on his cheek bones to make it appear more "sunken in" like a dead person.
KurtsFan 3 years ago
actually according to this book i have about classic horror and thriller movies and the 100 scariest movie moments on bravo, all ive ever heard is that he used paino wire to achieve the skull nose
slimmdogg2968 3 years ago
Check out this book called "Lon Chaney: Man of a Thousand Faces". Its by a guy named Blake...Im not sure of his first name but its a biography on Chaney and the author explains a pretty good bit of his make up techniques.
KurtsFan 3 years ago
I can't believe how good the make-up is, it looks like cgi.
Greya77 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's his actual face. Lon Chaney was a burn victim, thanks for being sympathetic.
thejobloshow 4 years ago
HE MOST CERTINLY WAS NOT!!!!! he made other movies and didnt look like this in them!!!!!
DrNoYes9 3 years ago 6
CGI could never match an incredible makeup job, using the actors own expressions. Lon Chaney was a master mime and makeup artist.
heynowmm 4 years ago 3
One of my favorite scenes from this film. It's funny, even though I KNOW what's going to happen, I'm always like, "No, no, Christine, don't do it"--she rips the mask off--"What the heck?! No she DIDN'T!"
Great video, thanks for uploading. Lon Chaney's Erik rules. Now, if we could only somehow find a Phantom who could have the face Chaney used and Michael Crawford's voice . . .
TheaterRaven 4 years ago 2
This scared the crap out of the audience member back in the 1920's! My grandpa told me that from experience! :O
sarahmariep 4 years ago 2
WOOT!! LON CHANEY RULES!!!!!!
<3
Phantomkiss 4 years ago
This is the milestone collection disc,just purchased it. Lon Chaney is the best actor the world will ever know.
chaneyfan 4 years ago
Lon Chaney is an amazing phantom. all hail Lon Chaney
VonnRosenberg 4 years ago
this isn't the music that's in my dvd...
KSab02 4 years ago
fantastic! now I wanna see the whole thing! Thanx 4 posting!
Actress06 4 years ago
Hail Lon Chaney...the best Phantom! He's really scary. Maybe they should do that in the actual musical!
UltraLass 4 years ago
I saw this on Turner Classic movies one time.
GOTHMIDNIGHTMERMAID 4 years ago
great movie , i enjoy the theme song very much so.
kevinhardy 4 years ago
Never seen that one before. That must have been really scary to 1920s audiences.
Perranporth 4 years ago
He's my fav phantom
SephysManda 4 years ago
Now i know how the evil Monkey from Family Guy Got his Point from
mgrchip 4 years ago
wow, another person realized that lol
mgrav1986 4 years ago
i could not watch the movie it had no voices
broadwayisadrug 5 years ago
I had the DVD with the original score and the original colors it was an awosme DVD. I'll have to buy a new one though, cause I have no idea where it is.
LightsCameraAaron 5 years ago
haha! he looks like a walrus!!
aidalai 5 years ago
Oh,hooray! My dearest Lon, this is the first time I actually got to see the moving picture! Before I had only photos to go by.
I don't understand why he frightens people so much, he kinda just seemed like "OH NO SHE DIDN'T" but maybe that's just me. :)
myoneandonly89 5 years ago
That's how I think. But that face IS scary, all by itself. But the musical shows him as tragic romantic figure which is better --though I prefer sexy Antonio Banderas as the phantom to Michael Crawford, whom I liked in Hello Dolly!
Get a look at my title piece featuring Lon in "The Penalty."
EmpressDR 4 years ago
this is not the original version,the movie is,but not the colors and the score.
Sneakerjeans29 5 years ago
I actualy didn't watch it becouse the sight of his face always makes my stomach drop.
musicchan0313 5 years ago