why in the hell would the us kill there own people you fuckin assholes you guys just cant face the fact we were attcked by terrorist and the reason the towers collapsed is jet fuel burns so hot it melts steel plus what was burning inside that was flamable so fuck you assholes that think this was a setup
i find this funny because i watched a video of 911 going down and at the same time i watched the mahna mahna song from the muppets sides 911 is gay shit
Thanks Conspiracy nuts for providing me with entertainment over the years here on Youtube with your bullshit theories and "facts." I truly want to thank you guys. I'll be on tomorrow to see what's next! :D
What you see is the air from the elevator shafts coming out the sides. If it would have been an explosion rigged demolition, it would have been at the corners and all along the sides. Sorry, This is BS
@47927411D I direct your clearly well informed mind to architects for 9/11 truth. I would post a link but youtube doesn't let you. Do some research there and see if you come to the same well informed decision you have here.
i believe this was an iside job with thermite and bombs, plus the jet fuel added to all of that but one thing that boggles me is; if its an inside job how did they get these stupid fucks to fly into the building
@kiddownstreet4 Not you, or your government. Members within that government. There is no way something this big would be shared amongst all members of government, not everyone is a heartless bastard.
U show me a controlled demolition that explode rop down, the one u shown so far were bottom up to give a control fall. WTC fell top down so can't see any supporting evidence of controlled demolition. The side explosion u highlighted could has resulted in support beam column being forced outwards along with dust and other accumulated materials out at the weakest point. IF WTC collasped started at the bottom up then yes could be a controlled demolition, but it's not.
@PJWolf35 What about WT7? That looked like a controlled collapse starting from the bottom, yes? It did not get hit by a plane, and no other buildings have ever gone down like that due to fire, to my knowledge. Based on this, why is it so difficult to believe that the towers weren't taken down by a modified controlled demolition with multiple timed collapse blast points?
@AustinHU4Fl that theory might fly if you could see the falling slow down a
LOT or stop when it got to the 1st super reinforced section of building but since the fall didn't slow whatsoever even through 2 sections of that then theres no way they didn't come down with a lot of extra help.
@AustinHU4Fl If a building collapses in on itself, it does so toward the weakest point - this is simple physics - the object will travel in the direction of least friction. Not, like shown, straight down perfectly into its own footprint. Which, by the way, has never happened in the history of any steel or otherwise tower collapsing - and it happened 3 times in one day here.
@johnnylr saying this you also have to say that never was a building the height of the wtc ever stuck by an american airline plane... if a building constructed the same way as the world trade center and stood over 50 years and someone flew a plane that big in the same way would the same result happen you would say no but I would say theres a good chance it would... the floors were already dropped and collapsed to the floors below where the so called explosions were seen here /SAD
@ballinbeasy You say this from a completely ignorant position - watch architects for 9/11 truth - they know about structural engineering and there are thousands of them that have signed up claiming that this was completely impossible. You neglect to take into account that jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to melt steal. You also neglect that the buildings fell at freefall speed (no resistance). You also neglect the fact that WTC7 collapsed from a confined fire.
@ballinbeasy Confined fire meaning that it would have, if collapsing at all, done so towards the corner that was damaged (path of least resistance) - this is simple physics that were broken (if the official story is to be believed) 3 times in one day when there was no precedence of such an occurrence in history.
i beilive this. for several reason. 1. its proven that jet fuel cannot burn steel, so there had to be some type of explosives. also, this was a way to get the united states into war.
@julianbautista87 Architects for 9/11 truth; there are some certified architects showing unequivocal proof that the buildings could not have collapsed naturally. Give it a watch, if only to see another side of the argument.
Zionist Mossad agents did this, it's religious motivated.(Could as well be any of your politicians or otherwise influencial 'american' Jews since the US seems to have no problem with Israeli dual-citizenship and 'dual'-loyality within thier government)
To get an understanding as to why people are capable of such evil.
You have to look into the moral values as described by the Jewish Talmud, which many Jews tend to rely upon.
@firefighter6199 Structural engineer my arse. Taking explosives in to a burning building your a fucking idiot You don't know what your talking about. You say The collapse zone was over 2000 feet wtf are you talking about explosives would have to have been used then. I think your a fucking moron and its a shame you weren't in one of the buildings, because your stupid bullshit views are frankly irresponsible. No skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fire yet you seem to know more than NIST.
@firefighter6199 I don't believe or understand how a structural engineer ends up as a fireman ? You haven't answered why a skyscraper can collapse just because of fire. Examples Interstate Bank Building burned on 5 floors for 4 hours NO COLLAPSE. Meridian Plaza burned on 8 floors for 18 hours NO COLLAPSE. Caracas, Venezuela burned for more 17 hours and spread over 26 floors NO COLLAPSE. Windsor Building Spain, burned for two days. The building was completely engulfed in flames NO COLLAPSE.
@firefighter6199 Oh yea I forgot building 7 was hit by flight 93. Oh no it wasn't sorry it was from fire. You ignorant cunt I wish you would just fuck off and die. You have never been a structural engineer, your talking out of your ass so you can justify your ridiculous claims and spread disinformation . Oh no I suddenly remembered flight 93 was shot down. and vaporized with the other 3 planes that day. I wonder what happened to the $2.3 Trillion that went missing, that would have paid for 9/11
@firefighter6199 Judging by your immature profile page you seem to find fat people funny. Not the sort of thing I would expect from a seasoned firefighter with 45+ years of knowledge about structural firefighting, yet your profile also states your age at 22. That means you were at collage before you were even born. NIST said building 7 collapsed because of fire yet you quoted My buddy worked for the demolition crew to take down building 7. Your tripping over your own lies your a dickhead moron.
@firefighter6199 Your nephew made your profile ?? What are you a fucking idiot. Oh yea sorry yes you are. I would do anything to smack you in the mouth you lying fucking retarded cunt. Nobody believes your ridiculous claims. Your a 22 year old fucked up nobody moron. Get back and fuck your sister up the arse you waste of space.That's if your mum isn't sucking your excuse for a cock
@firefighter6199 If your saying the building 7 was demolished then the explosives would have had to have been placed in the building weeks before it came down meaning it was already planned. Jet fuel burns at about 950*C in a regulated optimal mix but that never happened because most of the fuel burned off in the first explosion we can amuse the temp got no higher that 650*C. The whole floor seems to have magically collapsed symmetrically through the path of most resistance, which is bullshit.
@firefighter6199 Building 7 was a long way from wtc 1 so how can you explain how very heavy steel beams were ejected hundreds of feet away from a falling building. Gravity doesn't throw things out they fall downwards. Even if the concrete fails under extreme heat and we are to assume it was a pancake collapse why wasn't the super strong undamaged part of the steel core still standing upright. The reason is there was no pancake collapse. It was demolished floor by floor like a pile-driver ??
Guess what if you believe the official government conspiracy and the accusations it was Osama Bin Laden and ALciaDA then im forced to say you are a BLITHERING IDIOT i bet you don't know a third building collapsed obviously in a controlled manner so please do us thinkers a favor and shut your programmed mouths up no more bullshit you assholes we know you are comfortable with your prejudice we all are and the last thing i wanted to do is troll but man you guys are fucking trolls
@callofthedeadnw ehm people that work there go in there with suitcases... just have a couple people with suitcases in some floor and triggered explosions
Oh yeah first there planes that are not real it was hit by a ufo, then the planes had bombs on them, then the whole thing itself was faked, now its controlled demolition even though the building fell from the top going down.. oh btw osama isnt dead and we also never ever landed on the moon and our govt. is totally against us and wants to kill us all.. thats totally why they killed us all already and im the locknus monster from the planet orgal.. nice to meet u all
Omg ive never seen more narrow minded ppl on youtube oh they wouldnt take 3000 lives uh yeah they would if u go past the area 51 sign they will shoot uthey dont care if your 1 theyll shoot u
Oh fear! Oh terror! LOOK, the pause button on this video looks EXACTLY like the World Trade Center towers! It's a secret society illuminatti conspiracy!
No buying it, those explosions not only were too small or not that powerfull to make the building collapse, you dont see the continuos explosions that would've been around 20 or more, and also thats smoke coming out of the windows could be people jumping off and the smoke went out like presurized, and it could be the presure of the tower falling. NOBODY dares to kill so many lives seriously stop blaming Busch that was Al Qaeda
If it was a conrolled demo they would have waited longer and till the area was cleared and noone was in the building, it wasn't controlled it was those towel head turban faggots getting buttrammed by their 72 male virgins
@paolinojack Nope! Its the government! They kill whomever they want! If everyone was out of the buildings it wouldnt look like a terrorist attack. How would a planned evacuation look? Plus the 'terrorists' point was to kill a bunch of people. The government wanted to make it look like a terrorist attack so they would have a reason to start a war.
@Annealise7 So your tellin me that are on government would kill 3000 of it's on people just to start an fuckin war. Serioulsy man!. Someone is feeding your head with an bunch of bullshit.
The WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 were controlled demolitions. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth" documentary interview on my channel. Dimitri provides the most detailed and most logical explanation of virtually all 9/11 events. He leaves no stone unturned.
WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 were 100% controlled demolitions. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth" documentary interview on my channel. Dimitri provides the most detailed and most logical explanation of virtually all 9/11 events. He leaves no stone unturned.
I can't believe how idiots cry over 9/11 and how the "terrorists" "attacked us for no reason". They are blinded by lies that the corrupt Nazi government force fed them over the years, can't they see the bombs going off? The government planned it all, and they had the terrorists help!
@chesleycareystar Truth starts with the courge to name your oppressor. Political correctness is something they taught you, something they programmed into you.
fuck you dude, how can u post this. You spelled proof wrong. DID you ever think that maybe compression from a fucking building falling down might cause a few rooms to shoot out with air... no wait you think that a raging fire ball cant bring down a building... ONLY FUCKING ROOM SIZED POOFS!!!! fucking retard
@mrmatthewleigh OMG their is proof that 9-11 was planned by the goverment, theres proof that George W. Bush even knew what was going on at the time, he said that he was watching everything on the news, at the time he was reading to a kindergarten class how would he know what was going on when he was on the other side of the country reading to little kids? so there is complete total proof that 9-11 was planned by the goverment as an attack, people deny it because they know their wrong
@cheerlead8 that's one way to look at it, but it's not proof. There is more than one possible reason he didn't get up and yell "HOLY SHIT WE'RE UNDER ATTACK"
@cheerlead8 I can make a phone call across the country in less time than it takes to walk to my neighbor's house. And I'm not the leader of a government! Imagine what they have at their disposal.
@cheerlead8 so why did we go to war with another country if americans decided to crash into the buildings? im just stating this as u are saying if the "government" did this...
@cheerlead8 that doesnt answer the reason to go to war with an entire other country? if we did it there is no reason to fight with someone else then huh?.... kinda stupid if we went to war for no reason then. I think my point makes sense.
True. Like the video said, the WTC towers were made up of 3 parts, and in between them was solid steel. And the plane only struck the top part, so the steel would cause the top part to crash into the streets, not implode like in a planned demolition.
Well. yes and no, the planes were not to be hit the towers. They were setting up explosives to take them down in March of 2002. Sadly, that was not to be. How do I know this? Engineering. If you know anything you would know that the WTC was made with the WRONG type of metal which burns at a lower degree than what is in buildings like the ESB and CT.
I find it very suspicious that they're building a new building though. If it was planned the government would have (or should have.) stopped it before construction started. The new building is supposed to be taller and what happens when it's finished and something hits it too? Or if it was planned/fake (which i highly doubt the planes were fake like people say bcuz i've seen parts of the plane in museums) then someone will do it again. This was a poor decision in my opinion. They should have j
I have always thought how a building that tall could be brought down safely, without hitting nearby buildings, that is, under emergency situations. Is it a possibility that this is the method used, and, when building 7 went down , wow, no planes or bombs either.
there's actually proof that shows that 5 days before 9/11 the search dogs they had set in the WTC were removed & the day of 9/11 bush's cousin had a meeting that was moved away from the WTC. dead serious, we are all pretty screwed
tbh this has got to be the sickest thing the goverment has done, they named 15 terrorists on the plane (which there was no plane) and 7 were still alive. 9/11 was definatly fake. there aint any evidence for it not being a planed inside job. like if u agree with my theory.
If i was the people who planned this to get a step towards N.W.O, I would send in mantince men to throw people off since people know its there job to deal with important point in the building.
just watched loose change, it really opened up my mind, i hate to think that our own government could have planned this, but all the evidence leads to look like the perfect corrupted crime
why in the hell would the us kill there own people you fuckin assholes you guys just cant face the fact we were attcked by terrorist and the reason the towers collapsed is jet fuel burns so hot it melts steel plus what was burning inside that was flamable so fuck you assholes that think this was a setup
jeabbott96 1 day ago
why would anybody in the usa be so stupid to distroy that thing while ppl are inside it
sinaloa8738 4 days ago
Yeah USA kill their own ppl -.- any sense and wth?? O_O
vika921 5 days ago
cool seeing the first vid of the controlled demolitions in oslo, i was there!
MrDryass88 2 weeks ago
i find this funny because i watched a video of 911 going down and at the same time i watched the mahna mahna song from the muppets sides 911 is gay shit
superdonutman1234 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks Conspiracy nuts for providing me with entertainment over the years here on Youtube with your bullshit theories and "facts." I truly want to thank you guys. I'll be on tomorrow to see what's next! :D
we3575 2 weeks ago
What you see is the air from the elevator shafts coming out the sides. If it would have been an explosion rigged demolition, it would have been at the corners and all along the sides. Sorry, This is BS
47927411D 2 weeks ago
@47927411D I direct your clearly well informed mind to architects for 9/11 truth. I would post a link but youtube doesn't let you. Do some research there and see if you come to the same well informed decision you have here.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
i believe this was an iside job with thermite and bombs, plus the jet fuel added to all of that but one thing that boggles me is; if its an inside job how did they get these stupid fucks to fly into the building
2pacalypse25 2 weeks ago
Ur telling me that the we planned 9\11!!!!
kiddownstreet4 2 weeks ago
@kiddownstreet4 Not you, or your government. Members within that government. There is no way something this big would be shared amongst all members of government, not everyone is a heartless bastard.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
U show me a controlled demolition that explode rop down, the one u shown so far were bottom up to give a control fall. WTC fell top down so can't see any supporting evidence of controlled demolition. The side explosion u highlighted could has resulted in support beam column being forced outwards along with dust and other accumulated materials out at the weakest point. IF WTC collasped started at the bottom up then yes could be a controlled demolition, but it's not.
PJWolf35 3 weeks ago
@PJWolf35 What about WT7? That looked like a controlled collapse starting from the bottom, yes? It did not get hit by a plane, and no other buildings have ever gone down like that due to fire, to my knowledge. Based on this, why is it so difficult to believe that the towers weren't taken down by a modified controlled demolition with multiple timed collapse blast points?
cketterl78 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
sibebee 1 month ago
anyone else see the "face" in the smoke 2.23 -2.24 ?? or have i had one too many scotches ??
jaysedee 1 month ago
how about maybe the building was collapsing on its self?
AustinHU4Fl 1 month ago
@AustinHU4Fl that theory might fly if you could see the falling slow down a
LOT or stop when it got to the 1st super reinforced section of building but since the fall didn't slow whatsoever even through 2 sections of that then theres no way they didn't come down with a lot of extra help.
Ac1DGoD 1 month ago
@AustinHU4Fl If a building collapses in on itself, it does so toward the weakest point - this is simple physics - the object will travel in the direction of least friction. Not, like shown, straight down perfectly into its own footprint. Which, by the way, has never happened in the history of any steel or otherwise tower collapsing - and it happened 3 times in one day here.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
@johnnylr saying this you also have to say that never was a building the height of the wtc ever stuck by an american airline plane... if a building constructed the same way as the world trade center and stood over 50 years and someone flew a plane that big in the same way would the same result happen you would say no but I would say theres a good chance it would... the floors were already dropped and collapsed to the floors below where the so called explosions were seen here /SAD
ballinbeasy 1 week ago
@ballinbeasy You say this from a completely ignorant position - watch architects for 9/11 truth - they know about structural engineering and there are thousands of them that have signed up claiming that this was completely impossible. You neglect to take into account that jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to melt steal. You also neglect that the buildings fell at freefall speed (no resistance). You also neglect the fact that WTC7 collapsed from a confined fire.
johnnylr 1 week ago
@ballinbeasy Confined fire meaning that it would have, if collapsing at all, done so towards the corner that was damaged (path of least resistance) - this is simple physics that were broken (if the official story is to be believed) 3 times in one day when there was no precedence of such an occurrence in history.
johnnylr 1 week ago
@AustinHU4Fl (collapsing by means other than demolition)
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
if this isnt even a fraction of the proof that you have come across then why would you only show the same stuff that is on every 'Proof" video??
jpride100 2 months ago
@jpride100 No, he said this isn't even a fraction of the proof out there - not that he has found himself - this is what he has found. Read properly.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
i beilive this. for several reason. 1. its proven that jet fuel cannot burn steel, so there had to be some type of explosives. also, this was a way to get the united states into war.
pancakelover101 2 months ago 2
wow, incredibly talented scientists youtube have nowadays.
julianbautista87 2 months ago
@julianbautista87 hahah great point
MrGermanVermin 2 months ago
@julianbautista87 Architects for 9/11 truth; there are some certified architects showing unequivocal proof that the buildings could not have collapsed naturally. Give it a watch, if only to see another side of the argument.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
@KarateMan1145
@tictac789123
Zionist Mossad agents did this, it's religious motivated.(Could as well be any of your politicians or otherwise influencial 'american' Jews since the US seems to have no problem with Israeli dual-citizenship and 'dual'-loyality within thier government)
To get an understanding as to why people are capable of such evil.
You have to look into the moral values as described by the Jewish Talmud, which many Jews tend to rely upon.
srry for sounding rude but it's the truth.
Tautoulogic 2 months ago
but why would they kill their own people?
tictac789123 3 months ago
@tictac789123 It's all about the money. If America hadn't gone to war to Iraq the weapon industry would be on the edge of collapse.
KarateMan1145 2 months ago
@tictac789123 to had a reason to invade the middle east.
PeruNation 2 months ago
i can explain that the wtc was not controlled demolition but 7 wtc its extrange i think that building was exploded
christopher74664 3 months ago
the wtc didnt collapse cuz of fire it collapse cuz of the weakening of the steel by the plane crash and the fire
christopher74664 3 months ago
@christopher74664 Christ. Research; do some.
johnnylr 2 weeks ago
the collapse was not planned by the goverment but the goverment is guilty of that
christopher74664 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
building 7 was not hit by a plane
=BWZELJA_fSU&feature=related
voodoowichdoctor 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 Structural engineer my arse. Taking explosives in to a burning building your a fucking idiot You don't know what your talking about. You say The collapse zone was over 2000 feet wtf are you talking about explosives would have to have been used then. I think your a fucking moron and its a shame you weren't in one of the buildings, because your stupid bullshit views are frankly irresponsible. No skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fire yet you seem to know more than NIST.
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 I don't believe or understand how a structural engineer ends up as a fireman ? You haven't answered why a skyscraper can collapse just because of fire. Examples Interstate Bank Building burned on 5 floors for 4 hours NO COLLAPSE. Meridian Plaza burned on 8 floors for 18 hours NO COLLAPSE. Caracas, Venezuela burned for more 17 hours and spread over 26 floors NO COLLAPSE. Windsor Building Spain, burned for two days. The building was completely engulfed in flames NO COLLAPSE.
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 I'm bored talking to you your a lair and an idiot
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 Oh yea I forgot building 7 was hit by flight 93. Oh no it wasn't sorry it was from fire. You ignorant cunt I wish you would just fuck off and die. You have never been a structural engineer, your talking out of your ass so you can justify your ridiculous claims and spread disinformation . Oh no I suddenly remembered flight 93 was shot down. and vaporized with the other 3 planes that day. I wonder what happened to the $2.3 Trillion that went missing, that would have paid for 9/11
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 Judging by your immature profile page you seem to find fat people funny. Not the sort of thing I would expect from a seasoned firefighter with 45+ years of knowledge about structural firefighting, yet your profile also states your age at 22. That means you were at collage before you were even born. NIST said building 7 collapsed because of fire yet you quoted My buddy worked for the demolition crew to take down building 7. Your tripping over your own lies your a dickhead moron.
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 Your nephew made your profile ?? What are you a fucking idiot. Oh yea sorry yes you are. I would do anything to smack you in the mouth you lying fucking retarded cunt. Nobody believes your ridiculous claims. Your a 22 year old fucked up nobody moron. Get back and fuck your sister up the arse you waste of space.That's if your mum isn't sucking your excuse for a cock
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 If your saying the building 7 was demolished then the explosives would have had to have been placed in the building weeks before it came down meaning it was already planned. Jet fuel burns at about 950*C in a regulated optimal mix but that never happened because most of the fuel burned off in the first explosion we can amuse the temp got no higher that 650*C. The whole floor seems to have magically collapsed symmetrically through the path of most resistance, which is bullshit.
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
@firefighter6199 Building 7 was a long way from wtc 1 so how can you explain how very heavy steel beams were ejected hundreds of feet away from a falling building. Gravity doesn't throw things out they fall downwards. Even if the concrete fails under extreme heat and we are to assume it was a pancake collapse why wasn't the super strong undamaged part of the steel core still standing upright. The reason is there was no pancake collapse. It was demolished floor by floor like a pile-driver ??
giptonsilly 3 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
Guess what if you believe the official government conspiracy and the accusations it was Osama Bin Laden and ALciaDA then im forced to say you are a BLITHERING IDIOT i bet you don't know a third building collapsed obviously in a controlled manner so please do us thinkers a favor and shut your programmed mouths up no more bullshit you assholes we know you are comfortable with your prejudice we all are and the last thing i wanted to do is troll but man you guys are fucking trolls
TheExposed4u 4 months ago
You spelt proof wrong therefore your argument is invalid
11PARKY11 4 months ago
The truth is bitter.
Jakguide 4 months ago
if it was planned witch it isnt how would they get the bombs in there
callofthedeadnw 4 months ago
@callofthedeadnw ehm people that work there go in there with suitcases... just have a couple people with suitcases in some floor and triggered explosions
NinoBrown117 4 months ago
Oh yeah first there planes that are not real it was hit by a ufo, then the planes had bombs on them, then the whole thing itself was faked, now its controlled demolition even though the building fell from the top going down.. oh btw osama isnt dead and we also never ever landed on the moon and our govt. is totally against us and wants to kill us all.. thats totally why they killed us all already and im the locknus monster from the planet orgal.. nice to meet u all
richardxx9011 4 months ago
Inside Job.....R.I.P. an alle unschuldigen Opfer....
wahrheitsfinderin 4 months ago
thanks for oping the eays of all we have to getup and do somting about it fucking goverment
kosibebet 4 months ago
i feel poor for the arabs and osama and al-qaeda who takes all the blames, sorry for misunderstanding you guys ;_;
umarazhan1 4 months ago
Worshippers of the government are certainly disagree with this guy?
EvilKnievel1980 5 months ago
This is insane. I never seen this footage in my life. But this video has straight up proof. I hope people will wake up soon.
xProjectTruth 5 months ago
completely impossible without the use of explosives
choclatesaltyballz 5 months ago
They will kill ppl and they feel no guilt doing it
Ninjaxfrog 5 months ago
Omg ive never seen more narrow minded ppl on youtube oh they wouldnt take 3000 lives uh yeah they would if u go past the area 51 sign they will shoot uthey dont care if your 1 theyll shoot u
Ninjaxfrog 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh fear! Oh terror! LOOK, the pause button on this video looks EXACTLY like the World Trade Center towers! It's a secret society illuminatti conspiracy!
Sunmayful 5 months ago
Comment removed
gndswann1 5 months ago
you would have to be the biggest dickhead
chapjan11 5 months ago
illuminati
ChriissyXxx 5 months ago
No buying it, those explosions not only were too small or not that powerfull to make the building collapse, you dont see the continuos explosions that would've been around 20 or more, and also thats smoke coming out of the windows could be people jumping off and the smoke went out like presurized, and it could be the presure of the tower falling. NOBODY dares to kill so many lives seriously stop blaming Busch that was Al Qaeda
saintous94 5 months ago
If it was a conrolled demo they would have waited longer and till the area was cleared and noone was in the building, it wasn't controlled it was those towel head turban faggots getting buttrammed by their 72 male virgins
paolinojack 5 months ago
@paolinojack Nope! Its the government! They kill whomever they want! If everyone was out of the buildings it wouldnt look like a terrorist attack. How would a planned evacuation look? Plus the 'terrorists' point was to kill a bunch of people. The government wanted to make it look like a terrorist attack so they would have a reason to start a war.
Annealise7 5 months ago
@Annealise7 So your tellin me that are on government would kill 3000 of it's on people just to start an fuckin war. Serioulsy man!. Someone is feeding your head with an bunch of bullshit.
gndswann1 5 months ago
@gndswann1 2.3 trillion dollars reported missing from the pentagon the day before is a lot of motive for anyone to start a war.
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@paolinojack ur retarded then they would have never done it because we all wouldve know it was fake
IIKeMiCaL 5 months ago
@paolinojack Man you really are stupid aren´t you?
GeneralRushHour 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paolinojack Man you really are stupid aren´t you?
GeneralRushHour 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 were controlled demolitions. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth" documentary interview on my channel. Dimitri provides the most detailed and most logical explanation of virtually all 9/11 events. He leaves no stone unturned.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 were 100% controlled demolitions. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov "9/11: Third Truth" documentary interview on my channel. Dimitri provides the most detailed and most logical explanation of virtually all 9/11 events. He leaves no stone unturned.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
9-11 was done to resume opium production in Afghanistan!
sanjoy81 5 months ago
take an empy milk jug put on the cap jump on the milk jug. there you go
SketchBoat 5 months ago
the people in the building will be saved. but everything gone wrong
chesleycareystar 6 months ago
I can't believe how idiots cry over 9/11 and how the "terrorists" "attacked us for no reason". They are blinded by lies that the corrupt Nazi government force fed them over the years, can't they see the bombs going off? The government planned it all, and they had the terrorists help!
Crysis482 6 months ago
Comment removed
SajjadTheKnight 6 months ago
9-11 explained in 3 easy steps.
1. Jews realize world economy unraveling due to usurous monetary policy means USA golem will no longer be able to protect Jews.
2a. Jews stage false flag event to preemptively force regime change, depopulate and destabilize all local threats in Middle East before USA breaks.
2b. Jews force diversity in White countries to thwart future nationalism caused by economic collapse.
3. Go on YouTube and argue with truthers. (watch?v=-k-WooZiEiE)
redcorona14 6 months ago
@redcorona14 human did this, this is human vs human. color and religion has nothing to do with it.
we need justice and truth
chesleycareystar 6 months ago
@chesleycareystar Truth starts with the courge to name your oppressor. Political correctness is something they taught you, something they programmed into you.
Jews did this.
redcorona14 6 months ago
@redcorona14 not everyone is Jew. you are religious fanatic so much
chesleycareystar 6 months ago
SO who planned the attack on us ? APPARENTLY OSAMA BIN LADAN!
WHERE IN THE HELL IS HE?
"300000 ft below the OCEAN ! why the fuck were pictures not revealed!!!!!
Fucken Corrupt government.
jasonjay173356 6 months ago
fuck you dude, how can u post this. You spelled proof wrong. DID you ever think that maybe compression from a fucking building falling down might cause a few rooms to shoot out with air... no wait you think that a raging fire ball cant bring down a building... ONLY FUCKING ROOM SIZED POOFS!!!! fucking retard
mrmatthewleigh 6 months ago
@mrmatthewleigh OMG their is proof that 9-11 was planned by the goverment, theres proof that George W. Bush even knew what was going on at the time, he said that he was watching everything on the news, at the time he was reading to a kindergarten class how would he know what was going on when he was on the other side of the country reading to little kids? so there is complete total proof that 9-11 was planned by the goverment as an attack, people deny it because they know their wrong
cheerlead8 6 months ago 16
@cheerlead8 that's one way to look at it, but it's not proof. There is more than one possible reason he didn't get up and yell "HOLY SHIT WE'RE UNDER ATTACK"
Tanksareforcowards 5 months ago
@Tanksareforcowards he couldnt have known what was going on is he was reading to a kindergarden class across the country and he had no way of knowing
cheerlead8 5 months ago
@cheerlead8 I can make a phone call across the country in less time than it takes to walk to my neighbor's house. And I'm not the leader of a government! Imagine what they have at their disposal.
Tanksareforcowards 5 months ago
@cheerlead8 so why did we go to war with another country if americans decided to crash into the buildings? im just stating this as u are saying if the "government" did this...
theamazingtoot 4 months ago
@theamazingtoot yes there is proof and yes i am saying that the goverment planned it thank you for pointing out the obvious
cheerlead8 3 months ago
@cheerlead8 that doesnt answer the reason to go to war with an entire other country? if we did it there is no reason to fight with someone else then huh?.... kinda stupid if we went to war for no reason then. I think my point makes sense.
theamazingtoot 3 months ago
@theamazingtoot your right it doesnt their blaming another country for attacking when they attacked they do it to cover up
cheerlead8 3 months ago
Comment removed
mrmatthewleigh 6 months ago
I cannot believe anyone would post that the government did this, how sick. Where in heavens name did this come from? Sad people if you believe this,
rosechris48 6 months ago
the plane just hit the top part of the building, it wont affect the lower part. its not jenga that once you hit the wrong part it will fall down
chesleycareystar 6 months ago
True. Like the video said, the WTC towers were made up of 3 parts, and in between them was solid steel. And the plane only struck the top part, so the steel would cause the top part to crash into the streets, not implode like in a planned demolition.
Crysis482 6 months ago 6
@Crysis482 and top part will slide down to the street and left the building in half.
chesleycareystar 6 months ago
That is what I mean't, but true..
Crysis482 6 months ago
@Crysis482 in history they built it to where it would keep an airplane inside if it were to be struck by one so it would NOT fall like a tree would
theamazingtoot 4 months ago
Comment removed
firefighter6199 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@firefighter6199 How about you? The proof is in the video. If you can't handle the truth, oh well.
Crysis482 3 months ago
Well. yes and no, the planes were not to be hit the towers. They were setting up explosives to take them down in March of 2002. Sadly, that was not to be. How do I know this? Engineering. If you know anything you would know that the WTC was made with the WRONG type of metal which burns at a lower degree than what is in buildings like the ESB and CT.
IndyB25 6 months ago
I find it very suspicious that they're building a new building though. If it was planned the government would have (or should have.) stopped it before construction started. The new building is supposed to be taller and what happens when it's finished and something hits it too? Or if it was planned/fake (which i highly doubt the planes were fake like people say bcuz i've seen parts of the plane in museums) then someone will do it again. This was a poor decision in my opinion. They should have j
LilPrincessBaby2309 6 months ago
Orale que loco...
snimrodeh 7 months ago
dead silent then at 0:35 BUM BUM wtf you had me turn the f'n volume all the way up
CelestialHeretic 7 months ago
I have always thought how a building that tall could be brought down safely, without hitting nearby buildings, that is, under emergency situations. Is it a possibility that this is the method used, and, when building 7 went down , wow, no planes or bombs either.
sewerbyarnold 8 months ago
there's actually proof that shows that 5 days before 9/11 the search dogs they had set in the WTC were removed & the day of 9/11 bush's cousin had a meeting that was moved away from the WTC. dead serious, we are all pretty screwed
777zombify 9 months ago
@777zombify who told you dat son
kounelakie 7 months ago
tbh this has got to be the sickest thing the goverment has done, they named 15 terrorists on the plane (which there was no plane) and 7 were still alive. 9/11 was definatly fake. there aint any evidence for it not being a planed inside job. like if u agree with my theory.
RaveZv 10 months ago
If i was the people who planned this to get a step towards N.W.O, I would send in mantince men to throw people off since people know its there job to deal with important point in the building.
gradedaxe 11 months ago
and how do they plant bombs if theres people in there
123454d 11 months ago
@123454d they had bombs alredy in them
LovEstonEdEE 11 months ago
what will happen next we will never know till it happens
123454d 11 months ago
just watched loose change, it really opened up my mind, i hate to think that our own government could have planned this, but all the evidence leads to look like the perfect corrupted crime
MikeConleysVids 11 months ago
GOOD JOB
FisnikG 1 year ago