Added: 5 years ago
From: pastasauce
Views: 4,704
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks like this is called a dictat or a direct order propaganda media? Is that what your text book called it?

  • nice background music, sounds like Tool

  • @OregonCoastGhost Yep, "Lost Keys" from 10,000 Days.

  • @Neuromancer1970 I was responding to your comment referring to a satellite dish going in only one direction, not QoS.

  • @Neuromancer1970 There is satellite internet available that transmits and receives, but it is pricey.

  • You people are lost.

    Neutrality means stays the same...

    The Government wants to change.

    Net Neutrality is what you want to support.

  • Yeah, sadly you have a lot of naive libertarians flaming up your comments with "serious" propaganda.  "Government is bad" doesn't qualify as an informed stance on every issue guys.

  • as you're comment sucks

  • I totally agree and I'm for net neutrality as well. But you say congress is run by idiots, then you misspelled contact, "Contract congress..." It makes it sound like congress is a beneficial disease, lol.

    No offense though. Everyone makes mistakes, but it sometimes helps to review your work so that it doesn't have any.

  • lmao! "I love how people are making serious comments on it, however."

    im crackin up xD

  • I can't type in words, or speak of how angry I will be if suddenly my beloved internet is restricted to the choices of my ISP provider. This is like going backwards, and should be taken as a threat to citizen access to information.

    It's like satellite subscriptions, you have to pay for access to certain channels, and you can't pick ANY channel, you have to pick from the channels THEY PROVIDE ONLY. Like cable, one company will own several channels, so they make money guaranteed.

  • Does anyone believe that this have at least 0.000000001% chance of happenning... -.-

  • Sadly, yes.

  • "And it´s impossible to make the internet a free market because it´s to expensive"

    If it is so expensive then why on earth would you give the gov't responsibility over it? They've allready succeeded in lowering America's literacy rates. What more social institutions do you want the gov't to destroy?

    And no Net Neutrality is not mandated by the 1st ammendment. The 1st ammendment is not a positive right to property (ie the internet).

  • the support for net neutrality is propelled by the idiocy and ignorance of the American people once again. You idiots need to find out how this shit works before you start handing the internet over to the FCC. ISP's have tried this before and have failed because it is a bad policy and the free market takes care of it like it's supposed to. At least watch loose change and find out what the US government is. It's a gongshow!

  • The free market dosent work in a monopolistic market. And it´s impossible to make the internet a free market because it´s to expensive. If we would have 100000000000000000 providers with there own fucking network.

  • I am using satellite internet right now. I can download movie (though not many)and watch videos. It requires no telephone connection, just a two way dish I bought for 300 bucks.

    THERE IS NO ISP MONOPOLY OR OLIGARCHY. We don't need to hand yet more power to the government. That is how we got this lying, oligarchic, sleaze filled mainstream media.

    We have an opportunity to make it impossible for information to be centralized. The satellites are key, because they can't own the sky.

  • @kangalanatolian You've got to be kidding... You realize that your dish is sending and receiving information from a satellite in the sky that is OWNED by a company, right? Or did you think that your dish was magically picking up signals from everywhere? " The satellites are key, because they can't own the sky." - Um, they can and they already do.

  • like having dial-up.

  • im up 4 net neutrality who is against it? big corp networks.

  • God the american citizens will fall for anything. From a North American Union to Net Neutrality. Wakey, wakey!

  • that is true , the ISP will tell hey u old folk if u want to check ur email faster vote for packet trafficking! because a ramdom small amouth of people are using 99.99% of all bandwith that the stupid thing i ever seen! how can 5% of comcast user use 30% of all bandwith! and even so? those grand parent paying 100$ for fiber only check email and browse there homeland news papers! like wtf!

  • Very nice. But (wince) -- it's "contact" Congress, not "contract" them, and "paid," not "payed".

  • not all propaganda is bad, or even fake

  • where are my lost keys?

  • Nice effort, but it's not propaganda.

  • KC your the fucking shit!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more