Again, people who can't sell their BS science as science fiction try to portray it as real science, this balloney is one of the worst ones.Please get a real job and let the scince fiction writers and scientist do their job!
2:50 do you know what happens to space shuttle on entry to the earth, they heat up! So if a commet carrying methane gas and other random elements was to heat up to thousands of deg what would happen... An explosion most probably, and what did we see... A Fucking Explosion! The only electricity required was from the friction that egnighted the commet from the atomsphear. I could go on for hours debunking this theory :D
@Typho0n86 they didn't quite say that it exploding at all is an indicator of support for their theory but likely the way in which and the degree of which it did, which they did not go into detail describing so this doesn't serve as a good argumentative subject. Better yet is the deep impact example, why don't you debunk that Mr. D Bunker?
@rzwehbe That huge flash of light looked like an explosion to me. & I got no idea what ur on about, either bad English or... But if its got anything to do with the electric universe theory then its easily debunked :D
@Typho0n86 uh yeah bro that's called English.... And it is grammatically correct save for the lack of commas which I guess I apologize for. I was saying that you thinking it is an explosion and it being so may not disprove what they are claiming in the case of those comets impacting Jupiter. They stated that they had a characteristic that supported their theory, not that they did not explode at all... so them exploding does not disprove their theory...get it? Please tackle Deep impact
@rzwehbe There are plenty of other things to disprove their theory. Like black holes, and the theory of relativity. Im saying that the commet hitting Jupiter doesnt prove their theory, plenty of other explinations for it
@rzwehbe they say "only electric currents creat magnetic feilds" in part 1, which is bs, ever heard of an iron magnet? or the earths magentic feild? ive posted heaps of commets if u want to go back through the parts and see why its all crap
Venus has the most circler orbit of any planet and as such would have very little radial movement so how do the filaments form on Venus but not on other planets? 5:00 WTF?
I remember asking my physics teacher in high school if there was lightning above the clouds at the same time it shoots down. I was told no, I found out later there is tons of lightning above the clouds... Shooting all the way to space!
I love this! It makes sense. And I believe in the end the answer will be such that even people without PHD's in physics can grasp it. However, I would like an extended version going more indepth about the things on the list that was rolled about the things the electric theory can account for. I would also like to know what things it CAN'T account for
and why the "common view" scientists and the electric theorists can't come together and figure out how to find all the answers by using bits of both models.
I feel the mythology comparisons may discourage scientifically minded people as I feel finding such similarities a bit like what the big bang theorists do when they invent hypothetical things like "dark matter" to make their equations add up and then start looking for it. It's easy to see what you want to see.
@niminiminimnim And you want to think that a planet-wide repository of information such as comparative mythology has no worth, so you wish to ignore it and want others to do so as well. If you'd look deeper into the material the way these 'legends' relate to the material at hand is explained in great detail, but hey, I wouldn't want you to see something you didn't want to.
Ignorance of concepts like symbology, consciousness, and Jung's Archetypes doesn't mean such subjects are invalid.
Note that I said, and I quote myself "scientifically minded people" (not ME specifically, I'm not discarding the idea, it's perfectly possible that's how it is but I know a lot of people that would stop listening as soon s the mythology comparisons come in and I would like those people to keep listening to the overall idea.) and "a bit like".
plus in my next comment I said I'm no better myself as I'm seeing connections that makes sense to me in a similar fashion: "But then again, I see similarities...etc"
It's great if mythology works for and interests you but please allow others to feel different. We're both here cos we believe in this idea.
Why be so hostile when I assume we both want the same thing; to see this idea taken seriously?
Keep an open mind, but not so open yr brain falls out.
But then again, I see similarities between neuron structures and galaxies, both electrically driven awareness and between thought to nerve function and physical response times and the behaviour and speed of a lightning strike (both many times faster going back than out)
As one becomes familiar with the work being done by these scholars (via the excellent video-clips here on YouTube and better, the source material) and sees the logic of it, it seems hard to understand how we could have devoted - are still devoting - so much effort (and money) propping up a flawed gravitational model.
@rwfone Yeah cause GPS or nuclear power doesnt work, thanks Relativity. Or computers, cd or Lasers dont work, thanks quantum mechanics. Your a retard if you think the standard model is a waste of time and money
Excelent. Someday the view of the universe will change to this model and most probably we will discover that life is more abundant than we think. BTW part 3 is missing.
Again, people who can't sell their BS science as science fiction try to portray it as real science, this balloney is one of the worst ones.Please get a real job and let the scince fiction writers and scientist do their job!
medeerbeer 1 week ago
2:50 do you know what happens to space shuttle on entry to the earth, they heat up! So if a commet carrying methane gas and other random elements was to heat up to thousands of deg what would happen... An explosion most probably, and what did we see... A Fucking Explosion! The only electricity required was from the friction that egnighted the commet from the atomsphear. I could go on for hours debunking this theory :D
Typho0n86 1 month ago
@Typho0n86 they didn't quite say that it exploding at all is an indicator of support for their theory but likely the way in which and the degree of which it did, which they did not go into detail describing so this doesn't serve as a good argumentative subject. Better yet is the deep impact example, why don't you debunk that Mr. D Bunker?
rzwehbe 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe That huge flash of light looked like an explosion to me. & I got no idea what ur on about, either bad English or... But if its got anything to do with the electric universe theory then its easily debunked :D
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@Typho0n86 uh yeah bro that's called English.... And it is grammatically correct save for the lack of commas which I guess I apologize for. I was saying that you thinking it is an explosion and it being so may not disprove what they are claiming in the case of those comets impacting Jupiter. They stated that they had a characteristic that supported their theory, not that they did not explode at all... so them exploding does not disprove their theory...get it? Please tackle Deep impact
rzwehbe 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe There are plenty of other things to disprove their theory. Like black holes, and the theory of relativity. Im saying that the commet hitting Jupiter doesnt prove their theory, plenty of other explinations for it
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe they say "only electric currents creat magnetic feilds" in part 1, which is bs, ever heard of an iron magnet? or the earths magentic feild? ive posted heaps of commets if u want to go back through the parts and see why its all crap
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe They say in part 1 that gravity alone forms stars and galaxys, which is more bs, you need the nuclear force
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe PS i knew it was English, it was just bad English :D
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@rzwehbe Nuf sed or what no0bie
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
Venus has the most circler orbit of any planet and as such would have very little radial movement so how do the filaments form on Venus but not on other planets? 5:00 WTF?
laputahayom 2 months ago
I remember asking my physics teacher in high school if there was lightning above the clouds at the same time it shoots down. I was told no, I found out later there is tons of lightning above the clouds... Shooting all the way to space!
Jebus495 9 months ago
kudos to these men! I understand now thank you
fmbchris 10 months ago
I love this! It makes sense. And I believe in the end the answer will be such that even people without PHD's in physics can grasp it. However, I would like an extended version going more indepth about the things on the list that was rolled about the things the electric theory can account for. I would also like to know what things it CAN'T account for
niminiminimnim 10 months ago
and why the "common view" scientists and the electric theorists can't come together and figure out how to find all the answers by using bits of both models.
I feel the mythology comparisons may discourage scientifically minded people as I feel finding such similarities a bit like what the big bang theorists do when they invent hypothetical things like "dark matter" to make their equations add up and then start looking for it. It's easy to see what you want to see.
niminiminimnim 10 months ago
@niminiminimnim And you want to think that a planet-wide repository of information such as comparative mythology has no worth, so you wish to ignore it and want others to do so as well. If you'd look deeper into the material the way these 'legends' relate to the material at hand is explained in great detail, but hey, I wouldn't want you to see something you didn't want to.
Ignorance of concepts like symbology, consciousness, and Jung's Archetypes doesn't mean such subjects are invalid.
crazyirishdan 9 months ago
@crazyirishdan
Wow, yr a bit hostile!
Note that I said, and I quote myself "scientifically minded people" (not ME specifically, I'm not discarding the idea, it's perfectly possible that's how it is but I know a lot of people that would stop listening as soon s the mythology comparisons come in and I would like those people to keep listening to the overall idea.) and "a bit like".
niminiminimnim 9 months ago
@crazyirishdan
plus in my next comment I said I'm no better myself as I'm seeing connections that makes sense to me in a similar fashion: "But then again, I see similarities...etc"
It's great if mythology works for and interests you but please allow others to feel different. We're both here cos we believe in this idea.
Why be so hostile when I assume we both want the same thing; to see this idea taken seriously?
Keep an open mind, but not so open yr brain falls out.
Peace!
niminiminimnim 9 months ago
But then again, I see similarities between neuron structures and galaxies, both electrically driven awareness and between thought to nerve function and physical response times and the behaviour and speed of a lightning strike (both many times faster going back than out)
niminiminimnim 10 months ago
As one becomes familiar with the work being done by these scholars (via the excellent video-clips here on YouTube and better, the source material) and sees the logic of it, it seems hard to understand how we could have devoted - are still devoting - so much effort (and money) propping up a flawed gravitational model.
rwfone 11 months ago 3
@rwfone Yeah cause GPS or nuclear power doesnt work, thanks Relativity. Or computers, cd or Lasers dont work, thanks quantum mechanics. Your a retard if you think the standard model is a waste of time and money
Typho0n86 3 weeks ago
@rwfone Make no mistake, this is science fiction at its WORSE!
medeerbeer 1 week ago
If you are wanting to see this series of vids in their original context, search for
THUNDERBOLTS OF THE GODS
on google video. This seems to be the source
heckler73 1 year ago
The truth is always simple it's why it's called the simple truth...
I have always thought that the universe was electric in nature...
I also believe we are electro-plasmic beings.
GUESTSPEAKERS 1 year ago
Excelent. Someday the view of the universe will change to this model and most probably we will discover that life is more abundant than we think. BTW part 3 is missing.
Mexnexus 1 year ago 2