Gotta love the producers proving their own ignorance of basic biology and phylogeny in their own video. Don't talk about insects if you are showing clips of spiders and scorpions.... morons.
Calling evolution a theory, is an insult to the word 'theory'...and saying evolutionists evolved from monkeys, is an insult to the monkey. Yahweh forever!!!!!!!
8:00 No transitional forms of humans? You can simply type in "Human Evolution" in wikipedia and it will show you all the transitional forms between modern day humans and the shared ancestor between apes and humans.
5:38 The reason why we haven't found many fish ancestors is becuase the ancestors of modern day fish had cartilage instead of bone. Since cartilage decomposes faster then bone the chances of finding fossilized cartilage is very very slim. 6:27 No ancestors of amphibians? Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys, Tiktaalik, Elginerpeton, Obruchevichthys, Ventastega, Acanthostega, Ichthyostega, Hynerpeton, Tulerpeton, Pederpes, and Eyrops to name a few. 7:38 There is no such thing as an archaeosaur.
"The reason why we haven't found many fish ancestors is becuase the ancestors of modern day fish had cartilage instead of bone." So you're saying that in one generation, fish stopped having cartilage and started having bones? According to evolution, species must change in increments, not leaps and bounds. They couldn't have gone from cartilage to bones without some in-between transitional form.
@Challagar "So you're saying..." When did I say that again? It started with small changes one fish was born with cartilage thats chemical composition was a little similar to bone. Then one of that fishes predecessors (maybe 100 generations down the line) was born with cartilage more similar to bone ect. ect.
4:44 The fossil record is one of the most important pieces of evidence FOR evolution. It shows how evolution would predict. The deeper you find fossils in the rocks, the less complex they are. We never find organisms from today with 6 million year old fossilized organisms, and vice versa. When you find a lemur in the same layer of rock as a dinosaur, or a dinosaur on earth today. Then you might have proof for creationism.
@godlynessdog Dr. Zhe-Xi Luo at the Carnegie Museum of Natural-History “Nearly 100 Complete Dinosaur-Era Mammal Skeletons Found”
Dr. Burge curator of vertebrate paleontology, College of Eastern Utah Prehistoric Museum “We find mammals in almost all of our [dinosaur dig] sites
Dr. Paul Sereno, from the University of Chicago . . . He suggested that not only parrots but penguins and owls had been found in dinosaur rock layers too.
@hammcl01 Mammal's found in the same rock layers as dinosaurs is believable, but they were small insignificant mammal's that were nothing like the one's we see today. You would not find a mammoth or a saber toothed cat in a dinosaur dig site.
4:15 This guy obviously doesn't understand how fossilization works. If he knew how rare it is for an organism to be fossilized, and how rare it is to find one intact, and how little people are looking for fossils, and how big the earth is in surface area and depth, MAYBE he would understand why our records are incomplete.
@godlynessdog Are you sure that you are understanding how rare it is for fossils to form. And so why do we have so many fossils. Billions, in fact we have so many that evolutionists are having to change their theories to catastrophe theories.
@hammcl01 That is a blatant lie. Scientists (there is no such thing as an evolutionist) have not changed the Evolutionary Theory at all. There is no evidence against it. If you are saying that an incomplete fossil record is evidence against the Evolutionary Theory ponder this: Think of all the different organisms that live on this planet today. Now, recognize that 99.9% of the species that have lived on this planet are extinct.
@godlynessdog I guess you never heard of puncutated equilibrium. Evolutionary theory was changed because it could not explain the cambrain explosion. It still can't. Who observed them all? The question is not whether you believe creationism but why is it that you want to get rid of God? He has created this wonderful world for you to live. And has given you every breath that you have taken since you were born. And He gave His son as a ransom for you sin.
@hammcl01 Punctuated Equilibrium was an addition to the Evolutionary Theory not a rewrite. I'm not excluding a god out of the picture. A god could have created the first organism/organisms and then Evolution took its toll. I'm just saying what Evolution is saying. Organisms change over time, get over it.
@godlynessdog "Organisms change over time, get over it."? it's not as innocent as that. That is one definition of evolution that is used to cloud the craziness of the theory of evolution fairytale
@hammcl01 Of course, you can refute evolution because of scientific method, but you completely forget about scientific method when you say God did it...please explain who observed God when he made everything
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie Good you got my point. Both are a faith position. Now with that being said there is one person in all of history that claimed He was God and people believed Him and began to worship Him. And that person was Jesus the Christ. And it can be be proved that He did exist and 12 other facts that even critics except about Him. Search Dr. Gary Habermas and you will get a better explanation than I can give here.
@hammcl01 No, evolution isnt in the "faith" position. I mean, we dont know how gravity got here, thus we dont know everything about gravity, does that mean thats in the "faith position". We have never witnessed firsthand, plates moving under the earth, does that mean that theory is based on faith? No one has ever seen a quark, or a proton, does that mean atoms are in the "faith" position? No, of course not, its all down to probability, there is plenty of evidence to suggest evolution
@hammcl01 /watch?v=vwyFvIsoAnw and no, there have been many people who said they were God, this guy says he was a direct decendant of Jesus and is therefore God...do you beleive him?
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie I said major religions. People can say what ever they want to say. But something happen in Palestine 2000 years ago that even the historical writers of the day wrote about. And in less than 400 years most of the Roman empire was worshiping Jesus as the God who created everything. I do not think that will be true about this guy and anyone else who may claim to be God.
@hammcl01 Historical writes such as who? The only non-biblical text about Jesus came 50 years after he died and was about Christians rather than Jesus.And in palestine 2000 years ago there were plenty of Jews rebelling against the Roman rule,it wasnt uncommon for people to be crucified, nor was it uncommon for big riots to take place. And the roman empire fell into Christianity because it was an empire, as soon as Constantine decided he wanted to be Christian, he made everyone else too
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie There are actually 12 non bibilical historians that wrote about Jesus. In fact whether Jesus existed or not is not even debated among scholars who study ancient events. They also all agree that Jesus was crucified. They also all agree that the disciples believed they saw the risen Christ. You see that is the central message of Christianity. So to disprove the resurrection you must give a reason why they believed that He did raise from the dead.
@hammcl01 If you could name all 12 with refrences and the info they found that would be great. I know of two currently, Josephus and Tacticus who lived AFTER Jesus. And no, there is a fair amount of debate about whether he existed, iv seen plenty of videos and articles claiming he didnt exist such as godlessgeeks(.com)/JesusExist And i cant disprove he didnt ressurect, nobody can, i can give plenty of reasons why they thought that but it wouldnt disprove anything
@hammcl01 I think the best way of showing he didnt ressurect from the dead, is the fact that nobody witnessed it and its scientifically impossible. People may have beleived he did for several reasons, it was a very superstitous age, people still beleived that the God Jupiter was the head God and that he literally dictated natural disasters, famine, along with Posidon who controlled the sea. Ideas like that now are considered foolish, but back then it was a serious thing.
@hammcl01 So, you suggesting that a gap in the fossil record is significant at all, is completely ridiculous. Now, I want to talk about the word "Evolutionists". "Evolutionists" is not a real word. It is name radical religious fundamentalists use to try to bring science down to the level of faith. Evolution is not a religion. Evolution is a scientific theory that is on the same level of truth as the Gravitational and Atomic Theory. Anyone that does not support the evolution is not a scientist.
@godlynessdog Anything that is not directly observable is faith. We do not see abiogenesis today. In fact there is a law that says that it cannot happen you take that on faith and the def even says it is hypothetical. No, one has observed the early atmophere of the earth it is all theory. You accept what scientist have to say on faith. The clock work theory was a very elaborate theory but it was still wrong and it was disproved by direct observation of Jupiter's moons.
Name one scientist that believes in Creationism. Just one. 1:55 No direct evidence? How about the fossil record, nylon eating bacteria, similar bone structures, bacteria's reaction to antibiotics, carbon dating, reproduction, mutation, DNA, common sense, transistional forms, and vestigial structures. 2:18 this guy seemed to be proving evolution more than disproving it. 3:34 This guy is so ignorant there is no need in me disproving his beliefs.
Mutation proved why and how we are what we are, Also why dont you guys have freaken proof? Stop saying "you're wrong" without any proof why it's wrong. Now, a theory is a fact that is not been proven wrong. So evolution has NEVER and will NEVER be wrong, therefore it is still true. (P.S. the bible is not a theory, it's only a book made from a person, not god, so it CAN be prooven wrong)
The dichotomy between "Either chemical evolution or the God of the Christian Bible" is a false one, and entirely misleading.
The idea that there is "No direct evidence." to support evolution is incredible false, and a direct insult to the 99% of scientists who believe it. What about ERVs?
Speciation (division of one species into two) has been observed and categorized hundreds of times.
Obviously we want to preserve species, even while new ones are made.
Darwinism requires scientific truth, I agree, and there is a lot of prove. The age of bones that have been found, there is a reason why 9x% (95% or something like that) of biologists are evolutionists.
Christianity requires just faith and we require proof. Why don't we make this fair and all require proof, for both evolution and the bible fairy tale.
Vip thank you for your Godly advice, wisdom and videos and logic to! Got your message. I agree with you except maybe I should have said convert rather then debate. You are like Alister McGrath, Francis Collins and William A. Dembski! Smart and Godly. An atheist on thunderfoots video emailed me mocking you and comparing you to Hovind. They also said Jesus evo. from a friggen monkey. Left one other post on part six of this great video series! Thanks for your message advice and great videos.
@TheForthcoming1 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
Don't bother folks. Just another creationist trying to "pull a rabbit out of a hat"
AtheistToothFairy 3 months ago
@AtheistToothFairy You're an idiot, why would you go back to your pokemon world.
kingseho 3 months ago
Gotta love the producers proving their own ignorance of basic biology and phylogeny in their own video. Don't talk about insects if you are showing clips of spiders and scorpions.... morons.
juuonse 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Calling evolution a theory, is an insult to the word 'theory'...and saying evolutionists evolved from monkeys, is an insult to the monkey. Yahweh forever!!!!!!!
monteindamiddle7 1 year ago
8:00 No transitional forms of humans? You can simply type in "Human Evolution" in wikipedia and it will show you all the transitional forms between modern day humans and the shared ancestor between apes and humans.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
5:38 The reason why we haven't found many fish ancestors is becuase the ancestors of modern day fish had cartilage instead of bone. Since cartilage decomposes faster then bone the chances of finding fossilized cartilage is very very slim. 6:27 No ancestors of amphibians? Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys, Tiktaalik, Elginerpeton, Obruchevichthys, Ventastega, Acanthostega, Ichthyostega, Hynerpeton, Tulerpeton, Pederpes, and Eyrops to name a few. 7:38 There is no such thing as an archaeosaur.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
@godlynessdog
"The reason why we haven't found many fish ancestors is becuase the ancestors of modern day fish had cartilage instead of bone." So you're saying that in one generation, fish stopped having cartilage and started having bones? According to evolution, species must change in increments, not leaps and bounds. They couldn't have gone from cartilage to bones without some in-between transitional form.
Challagar 1 year ago
@Challagar "So you're saying..." When did I say that again? It started with small changes one fish was born with cartilage thats chemical composition was a little similar to bone. Then one of that fishes predecessors (maybe 100 generations down the line) was born with cartilage more similar to bone ect. ect.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
4:44 The fossil record is one of the most important pieces of evidence FOR evolution. It shows how evolution would predict. The deeper you find fossils in the rocks, the less complex they are. We never find organisms from today with 6 million year old fossilized organisms, and vice versa. When you find a lemur in the same layer of rock as a dinosaur, or a dinosaur on earth today. Then you might have proof for creationism.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
@godlynessdog Dr. Zhe-Xi Luo at the Carnegie Museum of Natural-History “Nearly 100 Complete Dinosaur-Era Mammal Skeletons Found”
Dr. Burge curator of vertebrate paleontology, College of Eastern Utah Prehistoric Museum “We find mammals in almost all of our [dinosaur dig] sites
Dr. Paul Sereno, from the University of Chicago . . . He suggested that not only parrots but penguins and owls had been found in dinosaur rock layers too.
I do not believe these belong with dino's
hammcl01 11 months ago
@hammcl01 Mammal's found in the same rock layers as dinosaurs is believable, but they were small insignificant mammal's that were nothing like the one's we see today. You would not find a mammoth or a saber toothed cat in a dinosaur dig site.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
@godlynessdog Hu, Y., Meng, J., Wang, Y. & Li, C. “Large Mesozoic mammals fed on young dinosaurs,” Nature 433:149–152, January 13, 2005.
hammcl01 11 months ago
@hammcl01 This animal was a meter long at most. Still not nearly the size of a saber toothed cat or mammoth.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
4:15 This guy obviously doesn't understand how fossilization works. If he knew how rare it is for an organism to be fossilized, and how rare it is to find one intact, and how little people are looking for fossils, and how big the earth is in surface area and depth, MAYBE he would understand why our records are incomplete.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
@godlynessdog Are you sure that you are understanding how rare it is for fossils to form. And so why do we have so many fossils. Billions, in fact we have so many that evolutionists are having to change their theories to catastrophe theories.
hammcl01 11 months ago
@hammcl01 That is a blatant lie. Scientists (there is no such thing as an evolutionist) have not changed the Evolutionary Theory at all. There is no evidence against it. If you are saying that an incomplete fossil record is evidence against the Evolutionary Theory ponder this: Think of all the different organisms that live on this planet today. Now, recognize that 99.9% of the species that have lived on this planet are extinct.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
@godlynessdog I guess you never heard of puncutated equilibrium. Evolutionary theory was changed because it could not explain the cambrain explosion. It still can't. Who observed them all? The question is not whether you believe creationism but why is it that you want to get rid of God? He has created this wonderful world for you to live. And has given you every breath that you have taken since you were born. And He gave His son as a ransom for you sin.
hammcl01 11 months ago
@hammcl01 Punctuated Equilibrium was an addition to the Evolutionary Theory not a rewrite. I'm not excluding a god out of the picture. A god could have created the first organism/organisms and then Evolution took its toll. I'm just saying what Evolution is saying. Organisms change over time, get over it.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
@godlynessdog "Organisms change over time, get over it."? it's not as innocent as that. That is one definition of evolution that is used to cloud the craziness of the theory of evolution fairytale
semitope 7 months ago
@semitope What craziness? It IS as simple as that.
godlynessdog 7 months ago
@hammcl01 Of course, you can refute evolution because of scientific method, but you completely forget about scientific method when you say God did it...please explain who observed God when he made everything
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie Good you got my point. Both are a faith position. Now with that being said there is one person in all of history that claimed He was God and people believed Him and began to worship Him. And that person was Jesus the Christ. And it can be be proved that He did exist and 12 other facts that even critics except about Him. Search Dr. Gary Habermas and you will get a better explanation than I can give here.
hammcl01 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 No, evolution isnt in the "faith" position. I mean, we dont know how gravity got here, thus we dont know everything about gravity, does that mean thats in the "faith position". We have never witnessed firsthand, plates moving under the earth, does that mean that theory is based on faith? No one has ever seen a quark, or a proton, does that mean atoms are in the "faith" position? No, of course not, its all down to probability, there is plenty of evidence to suggest evolution
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 /watch?v=vwyFvIsoAnw and no, there have been many people who said they were God, this guy says he was a direct decendant of Jesus and is therefore God...do you beleive him?
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie I said major religions. People can say what ever they want to say. But something happen in Palestine 2000 years ago that even the historical writers of the day wrote about. And in less than 400 years most of the Roman empire was worshiping Jesus as the God who created everything. I do not think that will be true about this guy and anyone else who may claim to be God.
hammcl01 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 Historical writes such as who? The only non-biblical text about Jesus came 50 years after he died and was about Christians rather than Jesus.And in palestine 2000 years ago there were plenty of Jews rebelling against the Roman rule,it wasnt uncommon for people to be crucified, nor was it uncommon for big riots to take place. And the roman empire fell into Christianity because it was an empire, as soon as Constantine decided he wanted to be Christian, he made everyone else too
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@BiddaBiddaCherryPie There are actually 12 non bibilical historians that wrote about Jesus. In fact whether Jesus existed or not is not even debated among scholars who study ancient events. They also all agree that Jesus was crucified. They also all agree that the disciples believed they saw the risen Christ. You see that is the central message of Christianity. So to disprove the resurrection you must give a reason why they believed that He did raise from the dead.
hammcl01 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 If you could name all 12 with refrences and the info they found that would be great. I know of two currently, Josephus and Tacticus who lived AFTER Jesus. And no, there is a fair amount of debate about whether he existed, iv seen plenty of videos and articles claiming he didnt exist such as godlessgeeks(.com)/JesusExist And i cant disprove he didnt ressurect, nobody can, i can give plenty of reasons why they thought that but it wouldnt disprove anything
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 I think the best way of showing he didnt ressurect from the dead, is the fact that nobody witnessed it and its scientifically impossible. People may have beleived he did for several reasons, it was a very superstitous age, people still beleived that the God Jupiter was the head God and that he literally dictated natural disasters, famine, along with Posidon who controlled the sea. Ideas like that now are considered foolish, but back then it was a serious thing.
BiddaBiddaCherryPie 3 weeks ago
@hammcl01 So, you suggesting that a gap in the fossil record is significant at all, is completely ridiculous. Now, I want to talk about the word "Evolutionists". "Evolutionists" is not a real word. It is name radical religious fundamentalists use to try to bring science down to the level of faith. Evolution is not a religion. Evolution is a scientific theory that is on the same level of truth as the Gravitational and Atomic Theory. Anyone that does not support the evolution is not a scientist.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
@godlynessdog Anything that is not directly observable is faith. We do not see abiogenesis today. In fact there is a law that says that it cannot happen you take that on faith and the def even says it is hypothetical. No, one has observed the early atmophere of the earth it is all theory. You accept what scientist have to say on faith. The clock work theory was a very elaborate theory but it was still wrong and it was disproved by direct observation of Jupiter's moons.
hammcl01 11 months ago
@hammcl01 Abiogenesis is not the same as Evolution. Don't get them mixed up.
godlynessdog 11 months ago
Name one scientist that believes in Creationism. Just one. 1:55 No direct evidence? How about the fossil record, nylon eating bacteria, similar bone structures, bacteria's reaction to antibiotics, carbon dating, reproduction, mutation, DNA, common sense, transistional forms, and vestigial structures. 2:18 this guy seemed to be proving evolution more than disproving it. 3:34 This guy is so ignorant there is no need in me disproving his beliefs.
godlynessdog 1 year ago
Mutation proved why and how we are what we are, Also why dont you guys have freaken proof? Stop saying "you're wrong" without any proof why it's wrong. Now, a theory is a fact that is not been proven wrong. So evolution has NEVER and will NEVER be wrong, therefore it is still true. (P.S. the bible is not a theory, it's only a book made from a person, not god, so it CAN be prooven wrong)
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
Good thing we found all the transitional fossils !!!
gregrutz 2 years ago
Ugh... this is pure propaganda.
The dichotomy between "Either chemical evolution or the God of the Christian Bible" is a false one, and entirely misleading.
The idea that there is "No direct evidence." to support evolution is incredible false, and a direct insult to the 99% of scientists who believe it. What about ERVs?
Speciation (division of one species into two) has been observed and categorized hundreds of times.
Obviously we want to preserve species, even while new ones are made.
FiverBeyond 2 years ago
Darwinism requires scientific truth, I agree, and there is a lot of prove. The age of bones that have been found, there is a reason why 9x% (95% or something like that) of biologists are evolutionists.
Christianity requires just faith and we require proof. Why don't we make this fair and all require proof, for both evolution and the bible fairy tale.
caspargomez00 2 years ago
97% of the highest scientics are atheist.
If you don't believe in evolution, you don't even believe that dinosaurs have existed...
caspargomez00 2 years ago
@caspargomez00
and atheist just give the creationist ammunition. It's them against God and God is never wrong. So the sheeple win.
gregrutz 2 years ago
science and logic aren't going to oppose evolution, evolution is a fact.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Vip thank you for your Godly advice, wisdom and videos and logic to! Got your message. I agree with you except maybe I should have said convert rather then debate. You are like Alister McGrath, Francis Collins and William A. Dembski! Smart and Godly. An atheist on thunderfoots video emailed me mocking you and comparing you to Hovind. They also said Jesus evo. from a friggen monkey. Left one other post on part six of this great video series! Thanks for your message advice and great videos.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
@TheForthcoming1 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
gregrutz 2 years ago