Kasparov blundered and lost this game. He never blundered much but he has blundered.
He was pissed that they granted Radjabov the best game prize and stormed up on stage and criticized the judges saying that the game was not magnificently played my Radjabov but was won due to a blunder on his part. He said that they only granted him that prize because it happened to have been himself that was beaten.
Gary got tired of the nasty comments around 2003 coming from the so called "rising stars" from russia." Gary's too old" " Its time for the new chess forces to move on" etc etc He shocked everybody by competing in the 2004 russian championship and won it EASILY!! Ha ha ha ha. I have studied the games of ALL the great masters of the present to the past and without doubt gary is the strongest player of all time, closely followed by alekhine, bronstein, and fischer (In my humble opinion)
Kasparovwas, and still is simply the best. I laugh when i see the headlines "Kasparov loses his last game".Thats a true fact, however, what they fail to mention is that he WON that last tournament in question and the player who beat him was a 2800+ player, (topalov.) Wow, how i would love just to lose ONE game and win such a super tournament!!!
Please,come on people!! You can't compare Chess to Poker! Chess requires100% skill, analysis and study.... Poker requires 4% skill, 6% Alcohol and 90% good fortune.
Radjabov is a very genius and strong at chess, but kasparov is an excellent chess player.So that, excelent chess player doesn't mean that he(she) always win...
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
@killingangel707 Look at the drastic increase at Carlsen ELO after being trained by Kasparov. And I never heard about him saying that training didnt help!! No way being trained by the universe best player wont help!!
It's got to be hard for a top player like Kasporov to be beat by a 15 year old, but truth be told, beating a great like Kasporov only matters if you do it more than once... in tournaments where they play 20 games or more, that's when you can see the differential. Otherwise a single blunder can cost a man his title.
There seems to be some confusion. This game is Radjabov - Kasparov, Linares 2003, a draw. Linares was a double round robin that year (each player plays each other player twice); Kasparov - Radjabov, Linares 2003, was won by Radjabov, but that is not the game seen here. I wonder if Garry even stuck around to analyze that one.
This was the Kasparov - Radjabov game anaylyzes from the Linares 2003, Radjabov won an sacrificed a piece, and he got a price for something. But kasparov protested and said that the sacrifice was not fully sound. That is what they're anaylizing in this video. But still .. Radjabov won so...
@Simangel1307 his age is not impressive. many young folks are becoming grandmasters in this age of saturated opening theory, where one just has to memorize 20 moves of opening theory and get a decent middle game. i doubt any of these young grandmasters could become GMs in their teens in the 1950s and 1960s like Fischer and Spassky. The best in the world are still the most experienced like Anand, Kramnik, Topalov, all over 35.
@ArrogantJew the available knowledge is different. That is the key. In the 1950's, why is Fischer the only 15 year old to become a GM? Was he the only 15 year old playing chess in the 1950's? How did he gain playing strength without ChessBase, Deep Junior, etc? I'll tell you, He was a chess genius. Not every young GM today is a chess genius. Just as a computer can be programmed to play great chess, so can a promising youngster with a decent memory, building on the shoulders of true geniuses.
It looks like Kasparov see"s enough potential in his protege that he deserves a thorough analyis of the game and appears to show an equalizing line for Radabov(sp?)
As to the comment about how "retarded" it is to go over a chess game you sir have no clue what your talking about. Second Kasparov is not being a jerk he's just analyzing a game with eccentric personality. He doesn't look real happy i'll give that to you, which is a bummer but he is an incredible chess player and kinda looked like he needed a nap.
thats y i only play 1 min chess if i make a bad move oh well big deal i play again and again. there is no such thing as quality of chess as the other guy could be sick or bored or dying or left his analysis at home or married with ten kids or a drunk or blah blah blah. i think the sport of chess is fun but the game itself is like watching paint dry also whenever you play a game you have many ways to play u can play the board the person yourself and so on
1400 fish lol u show your lack of intelligence and your skill as a chess player by belching ignorance a true "chess player" sizes his opponent up first gets his game plan and studies it before attacking if you maybe googled my name you would see i played ICC top "Grand Masters" and in one day earned 2551 rating with score of 28 wins 0 losses 1 draw against Yasser Seirawan and he got that because my mouse kept bumping my keyboard in the last 2 mins i hate poker too easy blackjack funner :)
There is plenty of luck in chess. Anytime people, with their limited, and often faulty, calculating ability are involved, there is luck. Even a simple bit of luck as picking a line or style of play that is considered unpleasant to an opponent often makes a difference. People are not machines, so luck is always involved.
Poker, too, has a component of luck in the game, but, just as in chess, the best player usually makes himself known after enough game play.
Yea but comparing the 2, chess is less luck than poker by far. Personally i was taught chess when i was 6 and even beat a couple masters when i was 10, but i gave it up at that point.
Didn't want chess to become my life, id rather play for fun than devote myself to it.
You are an idiot. Both games obviously have luck to do with the winner, but chess has VERY little luck. You can think ahead and make the move to win because you can see what is on the board, you know what position you are in. In poker, you have no idea wtf you are gonna draw next so all you have is probability. There is a reason why the top chess players stay the top. Not because they are the luckiest men alive, but rather the greatest chess players alive.
You must be rated B player or less to believe that there is no luck in chess. There is luck in every competitive activity. Look at Mike Tyson, right before he lost--he was considered unbeatable.
I said luck is involved, You clearly don't have comprehension skills. It was my second sentence and I even repeated myself in the same post that it has luck. This will be time number 3.
It seems to me that "VERY little luck" and "no luck" are nearly the same and not worth quibling about. Moreover, you seem to be intent on berating a stranger because he has a "VERY little" difference of opinion with you.
For your sake, I would suggest you spend more time learning to subdue your apparent feelings of insecurity--try yoga, or read a book that will help you write better. Gook luck little chess buddy!
I like how all you can do assume my intentions and my feelings. That's pretty pathetic that you essentially had nothing to say besides a few suggestions which weren't helpful at all. Next time you attack a youtuber, actually attack their thoughts, not semantics. If I say there is something that doesn't mean there is nothing. 1 =/= 0. Sorry, that's a quick lesson for you which will actually be of some help if you want to attack someone's language again.
In any case, I insulted your comprehension because of... well your understanding or lack thereof, of my post. What you basically said is that I insulted your comprehension because of our difference of opinion? You fail in applying logic to the understanding of language. And if you want to attack my writing, go on, I could careless, Because I still ace all my english classes. xD
@gtamateur Poker is about discipline and longevity, If you are a good player, in the long run, like 5 ten years, you will come out with a profit. Poker is a very very good game, just like chess
@gtamateur sorry i play both games and i love both. poker is not luck... How can u explain that some poker players can win the WPT something like 2, 3, 4 times ? More lucky ? :)
@gtamateur That's not fully true, there's been times where I won a game based on bad moves that turned out to be in my favor. As luck would have it, my mistake ended up working out for me.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
going over a game you played is retarded and gets you nowhere. its a sign of obsessive compulsive disorder. chess is boring and fun at the same time but n e 1 who has ever played a game knows you can stare at a position for ten years and make a bad move.
And both are great chess players and deserve respect for their play. Become a world champion and hold your title for over 10 years, then you have the justification for such a statement. But I think, you would find it stupid, to do so.
Hmmm Kasparov missed several wins in that game.He'll have to come back if he wanna level his score against Radjabov,He just won a rapid game against him.
Se juega con 2 dados. Cada contrincante se mete un dado en el orto y lo tiene que expulsar con un gas. Dependiendo del número que toque uno puede mover tantas casillas. Cuando uno se queda sin gases, pierde la partida. El reloj está para controlar que uno no pase más tiempo que el otro cagando.
Los comodines son platos de porotos, que nutren de efectividad gasiferosa a los jugadores. Sólo se obtienen si sale un 7 en el dado o si un peón corona.
You guys know how many games Kasparov had to play in order to get his first world tittle?
Well over 40. Kasparov lost the battle but not the war. The kid is good but he has yet to acomplish many more things. Do you know if he won that turnament? NO!! Why is that. You do not only have to be good, you also have to be consistent. Kasparov, the best; over and over. when you win, does not mean you are the best, when you loose, your are not necessarily the worst. Overconfidence was Kasparov's sin.
Look at his body language!!!Clearly irritated by losing to a 15 year old! I know I would!!!! They even gave a brilliancy prize to the lad! This would have rattled 'McEnroe' further!!!
oh no, the opposite. he lost to this 16 yr old. and he's explaining why he shouldn't have lost, so he's schooling him AFTER the game to save face. he's probably right though. although who knows, he's dominating the conversation. what you are seeing is a bruised ego compensating by showing off how good his analysis skills are, which are in fact likely the best ever.
what a waste of brain power.. :P
oxiigen 1 month ago
Kasparov blundered and lost this game. He never blundered much but he has blundered.
He was pissed that they granted Radjabov the best game prize and stormed up on stage and criticized the judges saying that the game was not magnificently played my Radjabov but was won due to a blunder on his part. He said that they only granted him that prize because it happened to have been himself that was beaten.
iankyoko 1 month ago
you are the best..baku ogre
AdrianErotico69 2 months ago
Gary got tired of the nasty comments around 2003 coming from the so called "rising stars" from russia." Gary's too old" " Its time for the new chess forces to move on" etc etc He shocked everybody by competing in the 2004 russian championship and won it EASILY!! Ha ha ha ha. I have studied the games of ALL the great masters of the present to the past and without doubt gary is the strongest player of all time, closely followed by alekhine, bronstein, and fischer (In my humble opinion)
TEDOVSKY 2 months ago
rajabov the best !!! kasparov also azeri )))
resulrzayev 2 months ago
Kasparovwas, and still is simply the best. I laugh when i see the headlines "Kasparov loses his last game".Thats a true fact, however, what they fail to mention is that he WON that last tournament in question and the player who beat him was a 2800+ player, (topalov.) Wow, how i would love just to lose ONE game and win such a super tournament!!!
janweltevreden 6 months ago
@janweltevreden True, he may have lost the title to Kramnik in the last tourney, but nobody mentions that he beat Kramnik many times before.
inemtsev 2 months ago
I like the way Kasparov teaches, he uses the "fuck you" sign most of the time.
Deecee022 7 months ago
6:05 Argentina!! felicitaciones!!!
kasparovdechile 8 months ago
Radjabov: Gary, can u explain it again?
from 1.d4 please
kasparovdechile 8 months ago 4
in super slow motion please!
kasparovdechile 8 months ago 2
The Beast of Baku is the greatest player ever!
dovespin1 9 months ago
kasparov=fag karpov=class GET The fuck out of russia u fukin disgrace!
warLock21X 10 months ago
i wonder what portion of the world's population could actually understand what's going on, language and audio quality aside
tubertomp 10 months ago
Please,come on people!! You can't compare Chess to Poker! Chess requires100% skill, analysis and study.... Poker requires 4% skill, 6% Alcohol and 90% good fortune.
nighterjay 10 months ago 17
16 years old Radjabov won Kasparov this is after that game
MrGardabanli 11 months ago
Radjabov was 15 the moment this video was shoot, no?
IdiosyncraticChild 11 months ago
Its unbeleavable to see kasparov analysing
federayk37 1 year ago
Look what a fast kasparov analyses!!!!!! Its jus the best of the worlD!!!
federayk37 1 year ago
Radjabov is a very genius and strong at chess, but kasparov is an excellent chess player.So that, excelent chess player doesn't mean that he(she) always win...
Tural192 1 year ago
@EL5TOABORIGEN hasta donde tengo entendido esa partida kasparov la perdio por tiempo
MartinAra07 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Student: "Master, what is the most complicated game man has created?"
Master: "Chess."
Student: "What about Go?"
Master: "Go has always existed."
lance1236451 1 year ago
Rajabov pwned Kasparov
QafqazWolf 1 year ago
LJUBOMIR LJUBOJEVIC na sala !!!!!!!!!!!
jmcardin1 1 year ago
i love that man (Kasparov),a big genius,and my inspiration to get better in chess everyday.
Tomasovich15chess 1 year ago
vc é meu idolo cara te amo hahahahahha
Ricku100 1 year ago
Observem a iniciativa e grande atividade mental de kasparov no analise! Radjabov e os outros mal conseguem entender o que se passa no tabuleiro.
olsonrocha 1 year ago
lol
addycorp2 1 year ago
4:51 es leontxo garcia el de la izquierda no?
jggrskate94 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
/watch?v=mwYQRteeHbE
or give in only : NEWEKLOWSKY
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
/watch?v=mwYQRteeHbE
or give in only : NEWEKLOWSKY
Moremover 1 year ago
vc é o cara kasparov
ainda vou ganhar de vc um dia
maycon2014 1 year ago
he is playing chess like calculating on a abacus
walterW1234 1 year ago
Kasparov charges Carlsen $200,000 per year for chess lessons now. And Carlsen has admitted that it doesn't help!
killingangel707 1 year ago
@killingangel707 Look at the drastic increase at Carlsen ELO after being trained by Kasparov. And I never heard about him saying that training didnt help!! No way being trained by the universe best player wont help!!
supbrahs 1 year ago
Wonderful but Kasparov hates helicopters :D
mptrax 1 year ago
Rajabov is da man..beat armo
Caspatriot 1 year ago
Kasparov at that point had already forgotten much more about chess than Radjabov will learn until he's at least 30.
U can tell he is enjoying this analizing session and grateful and he understands and feels Kasparov's wisdom.
OMHPOZ 1 year ago 2
@OMHPOZ imo Kasparov will keep his wisdom wout problems until end of his days
HerrFickt 1 year ago
@OMHPOZ Are yu retard? Kasparov forgets NOTHING
ArrogantJew 9 months ago
nuevo canal de ajedrez en español: youtube,com/ajedrezenespanol
AjedrezEnEspanol 1 year ago
It's got to be hard for a top player like Kasporov to be beat by a 15 year old, but truth be told, beating a great like Kasporov only matters if you do it more than once... in tournaments where they play 20 games or more, that's when you can see the differential. Otherwise a single blunder can cost a man his title.
CE750 1 year ago
jajaja Kasparov le enseña a jugar la pertura al tal Radjabov
elder65 1 year ago
pero em , uh, ah? como dem.. que.. tu en la misma sala ?? wow
FumarCagandoSFDK 1 year ago
There seems to be some confusion. This game is Radjabov - Kasparov, Linares 2003, a draw. Linares was a double round robin that year (each player plays each other player twice); Kasparov - Radjabov, Linares 2003, was won by Radjabov, but that is not the game seen here. I wonder if Garry even stuck around to analyze that one.
Blunderdome 1 year ago
I think it's hilarious when Kasparov slams the pieces down!!
rookman64 1 year ago 3
kasparov lost that game,he resings
pishtinjak92 1 year ago
I love how kasparov is teaching him like if he doesnt know anything, despite the fact that they drew that game lol
xxmichoxx 1 year ago
yea kaspo was black though:)
padseeew 1 year ago
@xxmichoxx Hey, I wouldn't mind a lesson from Kasparov.
andthatsforthewin 1 year ago
что они делают?? я так и не понял
simesyaba 2 years ago
radjavob le metio varios faroles y kasparov se los comió. 22. Axd5! , 24.D(Q)xd5!; discutible pero...27. R(K)b1! y no T(R)df1?? ke pierde la partida
rabasoti 2 years ago
Гарик тебя выиграл Азербайджанец, Бакинец, вот наша сила, тебя учили играть в шахматы в Баку, так не думай что ты великий
MrBaroon13 2 years ago
he is playin really quickly
Violinista2008 2 years ago
This was the Kasparov - Radjabov game anaylyzes from the Linares 2003, Radjabov won an sacrificed a piece, and he got a price for something. But kasparov protested and said that the sacrifice was not fully sound. That is what they're anaylizing in this video. But still .. Radjabov won so...
Shoarmaboer20 2 years ago
soo fast mooves from kasparov..his is great.but 'm the greatest!!LoL
mrpetrosss 2 years ago
1:21-1:25 SUPER DEVELOPMENT! lol
Fupper16 2 years ago 8
Azeris always got last laugh. We are Kings of Chess
CasPioneer 2 years ago
what is garry doing? Is he coaching him?
young2theb 2 years ago
Sai , Sai da frente, Sai que eu vou matar Independete!!
Comedor17 2 years ago
Os bambis amarelam no final, perderam para Bostafogo e Goiás, ashua ashua
Comedor17 2 years ago
jaja el otro cabron hasta se rasca la cabeza
alexanderban48 2 years ago
oigan y kasparov sigue vivo o ya se murio
pablo5835 2 years ago
esta mas vivo que nunca
Richtofen 2 years ago
el ahora es político en Rusia y es el entrenador de Magnus Carlsen...
garotobossanova 2 years ago
eso de jugar contra ti mismo esta chido si q le inviertes sesos ☺
kakashiitachisonlome 2 years ago
ahaha true... pride is not a stake in poker the prize money is !!
880330145789 2 years ago
worth watching you two quarrelling,, :- ]
LenoeZ 2 years ago
Это они анализируют партию, в которой Каспаров неожиданно проиграл Раджабову.
stomozan 2 years ago
oh sh...t I pressed the * for this video, underating it.
Sorry you all..
......
raimundodesousa 2 years ago
Radjabov should pay Kasparov for the lesson...lol
dovespin1 2 years ago 23
@dovespin1 Of course Kasparov's better but Radjabov won him when he was 15
Simangel1307 10 months ago
@Simangel1307 his age is not impressive. many young folks are becoming grandmasters in this age of saturated opening theory, where one just has to memorize 20 moves of opening theory and get a decent middle game. i doubt any of these young grandmasters could become GMs in their teens in the 1950s and 1960s like Fischer and Spassky. The best in the world are still the most experienced like Anand, Kramnik, Topalov, all over 35.
dovespin1 10 months ago
@dovespin1 You are missing a fact that everybody are under the same conditions.
ArrogantJew 9 months ago
@ArrogantJew the available knowledge is different. That is the key. In the 1950's, why is Fischer the only 15 year old to become a GM? Was he the only 15 year old playing chess in the 1950's? How did he gain playing strength without ChessBase, Deep Junior, etc? I'll tell you, He was a chess genius. Not every young GM today is a chess genius. Just as a computer can be programmed to play great chess, so can a promising youngster with a decent memory, building on the shoulders of true geniuses.
dovespin1 9 months ago
It looks like Kasparov see"s enough potential in his protege that he deserves a thorough analyis of the game and appears to show an equalizing line for Radabov(sp?)
poochpoints 2 years ago
kasp didn't lose a white game for 6 years until he met radja that day :-)
Davidoff73 2 years ago
kasparov le enseña al niño jwejeje
grande kasparov!
elder65 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK YOU ALL!!!
noxtradamentus 2 years ago
kasparov is explaining to radjabov that it was a draw that you should have agreed but i let you win because you are so stubborn... :)
alphalafa 2 years ago
Radjabov must have been over the moon to beat the greatest chess player in history!!
pixarian72 2 years ago 3
As to the comment about how "retarded" it is to go over a chess game you sir have no clue what your talking about. Second Kasparov is not being a jerk he's just analyzing a game with eccentric personality. He doesn't look real happy i'll give that to you, which is a bummer but he is an incredible chess player and kinda looked like he needed a nap.
calebjmurray 2 years ago
Теймур в 15 лет обыграл его ))) !
sikimichini 2 years ago 2
This is not how you play chess asshole
panictactics 2 years ago
i love kasparov, such a polite person
holl01 2 years ago
koçum benim babandamı satranççıydı
xanaxcace 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats y i only play 1 min chess if i make a bad move oh well big deal i play again and again. there is no such thing as quality of chess as the other guy could be sick or bored or dying or left his analysis at home or married with ten kids or a drunk or blah blah blah. i think the sport of chess is fun but the game itself is like watching paint dry also whenever you play a game you have many ways to play u can play the board the person yourself and so on
RhinoXeros 2 years ago
Only a 1400 fish would say this about chess. Why don't you stop wasting your opponents time with your 1 min chess and go play online poker instead.
wiseone0001 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1400 fish lol u show your lack of intelligence and your skill as a chess player by belching ignorance a true "chess player" sizes his opponent up first gets his game plan and studies it before attacking if you maybe googled my name you would see i played ICC top "Grand Masters" and in one day earned 2551 rating with score of 28 wins 0 losses 1 draw against Yasser Seirawan and he got that because my mouse kept bumping my keyboard in the last 2 mins i hate poker too easy blackjack funner :)
RhinoXeros 2 years ago
for myself i dont like poker because 50% of the game but in chess if it is your entiry fault and if you win there is no luck
gtamateur 2 years ago 20
There is plenty of luck in chess. Anytime people, with their limited, and often faulty, calculating ability are involved, there is luck. Even a simple bit of luck as picking a line or style of play that is considered unpleasant to an opponent often makes a difference. People are not machines, so luck is always involved.
Poker, too, has a component of luck in the game, but, just as in chess, the best player usually makes himself known after enough game play.
TexasRobert 2 years ago
Yea but comparing the 2, chess is less luck than poker by far. Personally i was taught chess when i was 6 and even beat a couple masters when i was 10, but i gave it up at that point.
Didn't want chess to become my life, id rather play for fun than devote myself to it.
T1memaster 2 years ago
there is pratically no luck in chess except the opponent make a mistake
gtamateur 2 years ago
You are an idiot. Both games obviously have luck to do with the winner, but chess has VERY little luck. You can think ahead and make the move to win because you can see what is on the board, you know what position you are in. In poker, you have no idea wtf you are gonna draw next so all you have is probability. There is a reason why the top chess players stay the top. Not because they are the luckiest men alive, but rather the greatest chess players alive.
BdizzleFaReal 2 years ago
You must be rated B player or less to believe that there is no luck in chess. There is luck in every competitive activity. Look at Mike Tyson, right before he lost--he was considered unbeatable.
TexasRobert 2 years ago
I said luck is involved, You clearly don't have comprehension skills. It was my second sentence and I even repeated myself in the same post that it has luck. This will be time number 3.
BdizzleFaReal 2 years ago
It seems to me that "VERY little luck" and "no luck" are nearly the same and not worth quibling about. Moreover, you seem to be intent on berating a stranger because he has a "VERY little" difference of opinion with you.
For your sake, I would suggest you spend more time learning to subdue your apparent feelings of insecurity--try yoga, or read a book that will help you write better. Gook luck little chess buddy!
TexasRobert 2 years ago
xD
I like how all you can do assume my intentions and my feelings. That's pretty pathetic that you essentially had nothing to say besides a few suggestions which weren't helpful at all. Next time you attack a youtuber, actually attack their thoughts, not semantics. If I say there is something that doesn't mean there is nothing. 1 =/= 0. Sorry, that's a quick lesson for you which will actually be of some help if you want to attack someone's language again.
BdizzleFaReal 2 years ago
In any case, I insulted your comprehension because of... well your understanding or lack thereof, of my post. What you basically said is that I insulted your comprehension because of our difference of opinion? You fail in applying logic to the understanding of language. And if you want to attack my writing, go on, I could careless, Because I still ace all my english classes. xD
BdizzleFaReal 2 years ago
i would have to say luck in chess is having ur opponent making a mistake. thats the most u can hope for really if u are in a loss position
880330145789 2 years ago 3
@gtamateur Poker is about discipline and longevity, If you are a good player, in the long run, like 5 ten years, you will come out with a profit. Poker is a very very good game, just like chess
holl01 1 year ago
@gtamateur sorry i play both games and i love both. poker is not luck... How can u explain that some poker players can win the WPT something like 2, 3, 4 times ? More lucky ? :)
guiguivoiron 1 year ago
@gtamateur That's not fully true, there's been times where I won a game based on bad moves that turned out to be in my favor. As luck would have it, my mistake ended up working out for me.
kikook222 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
going over a game you played is retarded and gets you nowhere. its a sign of obsessive compulsive disorder. chess is boring and fun at the same time but n e 1 who has ever played a game knows you can stare at a position for ten years and make a bad move.
RhinoXeros 2 years ago
they are talking in russian or azeri?
pelixinho 2 years ago
this just makes me crave for another kasparov game in history!
monbret 2 years ago
e4 c5 c4, immeadiate maroczy bind
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
kasparov is one of the greatest names in chess history
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
kasparov is a jew-criminal like fischer said haha
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
yo le mato a tu rey con un peon
3742149 2 years ago
fischer>kasparov
when its all said and done ill be one of those names
pAbedaNSK 2 years ago
I think, he was taller, yes. #
:)
And both are great chess players and deserve respect for their play. Become a world champion and hold your title for over 10 years, then you have the justification for such a statement. But I think, you would find it stupid, to do so.
Gurrjieff 2 years ago 2
Actually I wonder whether they're analysing one of their games at all...Because it does not remotely look like the QGA Kasparov played as Black
gabisubis 2 years ago
Kasparov surely must have won this game, otherwise he is not like this....
vossige 2 years ago
Actually Radjabov won this game.
kobebryant0824 2 years ago
Nope Radjabov won one game against Kasparov..as Black
gabisubis 2 years ago
That's what I said. (¬_¬)
kobebryant0824 2 years ago
You may not have noticed...but Kasparov has the black pieces in that video :-)
gabisubis 2 years ago
Ohhhh... I see... This is the one I'm talking about. Brilliant play from Radjabov.
/watch?v=4A8iamlyNto
kobebryant0824 2 years ago
Hmmm Kasparov missed several wins in that game.He'll have to come back if he wanna level his score against Radjabov,He just won a rapid game against him.
gabisubis 2 years ago
it is amazing to watch his mind analysing over a chess board. true genius
JadeiteGracie 2 years ago 2
analysing games with your opponent is so fun . wonderful to get their ideas and them yours. and to learn how they see the board. helps you play em
JadeiteGracie 2 years ago
que es el ajedrez?? se juega con dado?
amarokobe 3 years ago
Se juega con 2 dados. Cada contrincante se mete un dado en el orto y lo tiene que expulsar con un gas. Dependiendo del número que toque uno puede mover tantas casillas. Cuando uno se queda sin gases, pierde la partida. El reloj está para controlar que uno no pase más tiempo que el otro cagando.
mrcelada 3 years ago
y los comodines valen o no valen?
amarokobe 3 years ago
Los comodines son platos de porotos, que nutren de efectividad gasiferosa a los jugadores. Sólo se obtienen si sale un 7 en el dado o si un peón corona.
mrcelada 3 years ago
puto perro cagado no sabes del ajedrez que pena
aniquiladore 3 years ago
1º Por que me insultas?.
2º Cuando kieras te echas una partida con migo.
amarokobe 3 years ago
NOW WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS??? he's playing for both sides or what???
STOP CHEATING KASPAROV.
AlbertDarwin007 3 years ago
they analyze...
termodox 2 years ago
LMAO. Thank you.
TheSleepingLynx 2 years ago
I foundKasparov a little bit disrespectful in this game he kept slamming the pions on the board
AlbertDarwin007 3 years ago
estaba tan contento radjabov que no queria analisis
martinbuscia 3 years ago
You guys know how many games Kasparov had to play in order to get his first world tittle?
Well over 40. Kasparov lost the battle but not the war. The kid is good but he has yet to acomplish many more things. Do you know if he won that turnament? NO!! Why is that. You do not only have to be good, you also have to be consistent. Kasparov, the best; over and over. when you win, does not mean you are the best, when you loose, your are not necessarily the worst. Overconfidence was Kasparov's sin.
hotsickboy14 3 years ago 3
Where is the video where GK got totally mad at the journalists for giving this 'best game of the tournament' award?
momin8888 3 years ago
Radjabov has a healthy respect and wants to know how Kasparov thinks
deepseefreak 3 years ago
Why is he controlling the analysis when Radjabov is the one who won??
Fupper16 3 years ago
Uh...cause he's the greatest player of all time and Radj knows he got lucky.
PabloPena108 3 years ago
plese let Me post a vid responce Unless you dont wanna!
MichaelQuinnJohnson 3 years ago
is funny and weird at the same time that he uses the ring finger to point at the pieces and board. It is hard to do!!
betochon 3 years ago
That's his middle finger at 5:29. Is he sending a subtle message?
cgdale 3 years ago 4
lmao, right towards the dude in the grey.
honeybobkins 3 years ago 2
lol Kasparov is about to hit that boy XD
conodelamadreputa 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kasparov is an Armenian and the best of the world
shahnur79 3 years ago
Look at his body language!!!Clearly irritated by losing to a 15 year old! I know I would!!!! They even gave a brilliancy prize to the lad! This would have rattled 'McEnroe' further!!!
simoncuming41 3 years ago
Que fantastico material. Radjabov, que en general es muy efusivo en los análisis, esta vez se quedó quietito aprendiendo la lección. Garry es único.
artico21 3 years ago
de verdad es unico vez como perdio contra Deep-blue!!
Cuando no puede usar su preparacion teorica de computadora juega mal!
Vez la ultima partida fue un orror por un campeon de el mundo!
richardre06 3 years ago
kavparov vuelve porfa
antoniogallo1984 3 years ago
He is the Man!! huahua
guitrak 3 years ago
oh no, the opposite. he lost to this 16 yr old. and he's explaining why he shouldn't have lost, so he's schooling him AFTER the game to save face. he's probably right though. although who knows, he's dominating the conversation. what you are seeing is a bruised ego compensating by showing off how good his analysis skills are, which are in fact likely the best ever.
TomLakovic 3 years ago 7
this is not the game kasparov lost against radjabov; in that game kasparov was with white,in this one his with black
logofatul 3 years ago 2
It just goes to show how intelligence has nothing to do with emotional/social strength.
ahpacific 3 years ago
...so what's going on here? Is Kasparov explaining to somebody he totally schooled earlier everything he did wrong, or what?
RussellsParadox 3 years ago
Bravo Temur!!!Both of those are the from Azerbaijan originally!!!
dirabizli 4 years ago